Ten Things You Should Know About MIMO

Similar documents
Transforming MIMO Test

Keysight Technologies MIMO Performance and Condition Number in LTE Test. Application Note

Transmitter Design and Measurement Challenges

the measurement requirements posed by MIMO as well as a thorough discussion of MIMO itself. BROADBAND SIGNAL CHALLENGES

Investigation on Multiple Antenna Transmission Techniques in Evolved UTRA. OFDM-Based Radio Access in Downlink. Features of Evolved UTRA and UTRAN

LTE Channel State Information (CSI)

MIMO Systems and Applications

Addressing Design and Test Challenges for new LTE-Advanced Standard

MIMO RFIC Test Architectures

Keysight Technologies MIMO Channel Modeling and Emulation Test Challenges. Application Note

Keysight Technologies MIMO in LTE Operation and Measurement Excerpts on LTE Test. Application Note

802.11ax Design Challenges. Mani Krishnan Venkatachari

MIMO in 4G Wireless. Presenter: Iqbal Singh Josan, P.E., PMP Director & Consulting Engineer USPurtek LLC

2012 LitePoint Corp LitePoint, A Teradyne Company. All rights reserved.

Lecture LTE (4G) -Technologies used in 4G and 5G. Spread Spectrum Communications

Multiple Antenna Techniques

Page 1. Overview : Wireless Networks Lecture 9: OFDM, WiMAX, LTE

Technical Aspects of LTE Part I: OFDM

MIMO I: Spatial Diversity

Introduction to WiMAX Dr. Piraporn Limpaphayom

From 2G to 4G UE Measurements from GSM to LTE. David Hall RF Product Manager

Agilent MIMO Wireless LAN PHY Layer [RF] Operation & Measurement. Application Note 1509

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Peer reviewed version

3G/4G Mobile Communications Systems. Dr. Stefan Brück Qualcomm Corporate R&D Center Germany

Integrated Solutions for Testing Wireless Communication Systems

LTE-Advanced research in 3GPP

Multiple Antenna Processing for WiMAX

WiMAX Summit Testing Requirements for Successful WiMAX Deployments. Fanny Mlinarsky. 28-Feb-07

UNDERSTANDING LTE WITH MATLAB

Channel Estimation for Downlink LTE System Based on LAGRANGE Polynomial Interpolation

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF DOWNLINK MIMO IN 2X2 MOBILE WIMAX SYSTEM

Diversity Techniques

Utilization of Channel Reciprocity in Advanced MIMO System

OFDM system: Discrete model Spectral efficiency Characteristics. OFDM based multiple access schemes. OFDM sensitivity to synchronization errors

HOW DO MIMO RADIOS WORK? Adaptability of Modern and LTE Technology. By Fanny Mlinarsky 1/12/2014

NR Physical Layer Design: NR MIMO

Improving the Data Rate of OFDM System in Rayleigh Fading Channel Using Spatial Multiplexing with Different Modulation Techniques

5G 무선통신시스템설계 : WLAN/LTE/5G

MIMO-OFDM for LTE 최수용. 연세대학교전기전자공학과

Radio Performance of 4G-LTE Terminal. Daiwei Zhou

Performance Studies on LTE Advanced in the Easy-C Project Andreas Weber, Alcatel Lucent Bell Labs

IJESRT. Scientific Journal Impact Factor: (ISRA), Impact Factor: 2.114

Proposal for Uplink MIMO Schemes in IEEE m

Major Leaps in Evolution of IEEE WLAN Technologies

WiMAX: , e, WiBRO Introduction to WiMAX Measurements

M A R C H 2 6, Sheri DeTomasi 5G New Radio Solutions Lead Keysight Technologies. 5G New Radio Challenges and Redefining Test

Prof. Xinyu Zhang. Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison

A balancing act: Envelope Tracking and Digital Pre-Distortion in Handset Transmitters

Application Note. StarMIMO. RX Diversity and MIMO OTA Test Range

Measurement Guide and Programming Examples

CDMA Principle and Measurement

High-end vector signal generator creates complex multichannel scenarios

802.11ax introduction and measurement solution

LTE-Advanced and Release 10

Advanced 3G & 4G Wireless Communication Prof. Aditya K. Jaganathan Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

June 09, 2014 Document Version: 1.1.0

Performance Analysis of n Wireless LAN Physical Layer

CSC344 Wireless and Mobile Computing. Department of Computer Science COMSATS Institute of Information Technology

Using a design-to-test capability for LTE MIMO (Part 1 of 2)

Multiple Antenna Systems in WiMAX

Using the epmp Link Budget Tool

PXI WiMAX Measurement Suite Data Sheet

DESIGN OF STBC ENCODER AND DECODER FOR 2X1 AND 2X2 MIMO SYSTEM

Comparison of MIMO OFDM System with BPSK and QPSK Modulation

Simple Algorithm in (older) Selection Diversity. Receiver Diversity Can we Do Better? Receiver Diversity Optimization.

Development of Adaptive Array Antenna for Mobile WiMAX Uplink

MU-MIMO in LTE/LTE-A Performance Analysis. Rizwan GHAFFAR, Biljana BADIC

A Flexible Testbed for 5G Waveform Generation & Analysis. Greg Jue Keysight Technologies

RF Channel Characterization with Multiple Antenna Systems for LTE

Keysight Technologies Testing WLAN Devices According to IEEE Standards. Application Note

4x4 Time-Domain MIMO encoder with OFDM Scheme in WIMAX Context

Addressing Future Wireless Demand

Use of Multiple-Antenna Technology in Modern Wireless Communication Systems

3GPP Long Term Evolution LTE

SNS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING COIMBATORE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY QUESTION BANK

Making Noise in RF Receivers Simulate Real-World Signals with Signal Generators

Professor Paulraj and Bringing MIMO to Practice

3G long-term evolution

Wireless Networks: An Introduction

LTE Signal Quality Analysis. BTS Master, Cell Master,, Spectrum Master

LTE Transmission Modes and Beamforming White Paper

S.D.M COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

OFDMA and MIMO Notes

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Peer reviewed version. Link to published version (if available): /PIMRC.2009.

Adaptive Precoded MIMO for LTE Wireless Communication

MU-MIMO with Fixed Beamforming for

ENERGY EFFICIENT WATER-FILLING ALGORITHM FOR MIMO- OFDMA CELLULAR SYSTEM

LTE. Essential Test and Measurement Tools

UTILIZATION OF AN IEEE 1588 TIMING REFERENCE SOURCE IN THE inet RF TRANSCEIVER

M2M Cellular Antennas: SISO v. MIMO

2015 The MathWorks, Inc. 1

Improving MU-MIMO Performance in LTE-(Advanced) by Efficiently Exploiting Feedback Resources and through Dynamic Scheduling

Decrease Interference Using Adaptive Modulation and Coding

Agilent E6651A Mobile WiMAX Test Set

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Per Stream Power Control in CQICH Enhanced Allocation IE

Interference management Within 3GPP LTE advanced

3G Evolution. Outline. Chapter: Multi-antenna configurations. Introduction. Introduction. Multi-antenna techniques. Multiple receiver antennas, SIMO

1 Overview of MIMO communications

RF chipset verification for UMTS LTE (FDD) with R&S SMU200A and R&S FSQ Application Note

References. What is UMTS? UMTS Architecture

Transcription:

Ten Things You Should Know About MIMO 4G World 2009 presented by: David L. Barner www/agilent.com/find/4gworld Copyright 2009 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

The Full Agenda Intro System Operation 1: Cellular MIMO uses downlink and uplink differently 2: MIMO needs at least 2 transmitters and 2 receivers MIMO signal transmission and recovery 3: MIMO signal recovery is a 2 step process 4: Transmit & receive phase differences don t affect open loop MIMO 5: BS and MS antenna configuration has a big impact on path correlation 6: MIMO needs a better SNR than SISO 7: Precoding and eigenbeamforming couple the signals to suit the channel Single and Multiple input measurements 8: Cross channel measurements can be made with a single input analyzer 9: Condition number measures the short term channel performance 10: Distortion in one component can degrade all the data streams

Intro

Intro Multiple Antennas can be used in a variety of ways: Diversity Techniques Transmit Diversity Receive Diversity MIMO Techniques DL (SU-MIMO) UL (MU-MIMO) Beamforming Techniques

Intro Multiple Antennas can be used in a variety of ways: Diversity techniques protect against fading, and improve coverage Same data on antennas Picks the best (strongest) multipath signals Combines multipath for best overall result Improves S/N TX Diversity RX Diversity

Intro Multiple Antennas can be used in a variety of ways: MIMO techniques increases the spectral efficiency of the transmission, increasing capacity by using Spatial Multiplexing and Precoding Tx0 MIMO Rx0 MIMO Spatial Multiplexing is the simultaneous use of the same frequencies to transmit independent data streams Tx1 Rx1 Precoding (mixing) of the two streams is used to optimize the transmission into the channel so that the receiver has the best chance of recovering the original data streams. Adding diversity to MIMO will improve performance

Intro Multiple Antennas can be used in a variety of ways: Beamforming techniques reduces interference when there are many users, and may improve the S/N in some cases Beamforming is the opposite of Spatial Multiplexing / MIMO It relies on the channel being correlated rather than uncorrelated The goal is to combine the energy from each transmitter and direct it towards the receiver to improve the received SNR but not the data rate. Beamforming becomes most useful with larger numbers of transmit antennas Tx0 Tx1 Rx0 Rx1

Intro

Intro

10 Things about MIMO: The Simplified Agenda System Operation MIMO signal transmission and recovery Single and Multiple input measurements

1: MIMO is Used Differently in the Downlink and Uplink of a Cellular System In the Downlink, it s like WLAN, the whole MIMO transmission is given to a Single User (SU) The scheduler in the LTE Base Station multiplexes user data traffic into codewords (Streams) If there are more transmitters available than codewords, layer mapping is used (layer in LTE = stream in WiMAX)

MIMO in the Downlink Coupling in the Channel (Streams) The channel starts after precoding Unwanted coupling in the radio will introduce errors in precoding The antennas are a critical part of the channel

MIMO in the Downlink - Reception A single mobile recovers the MIMO transmission via 2 receivers (Streams)

MIMO in the Downlink Closed Loop Precoding is applied for closed loop operation The mobile measures the channel to send reports back to the BS The BS decides how to modify the transmission Scheduler CQI, RI, PMI reports

2: MIMO Operation Requires at Least Two Transmitters & Two Receivers In cellular MIMO, two mobiles are used together in the Uplink to create the MIMO signal Known as Collaborative MIMO in WiMAX. Multi-User MIMO in LTE Increased capacity benefit achieved w/lower cost and less battery drain per phone (i.e., 1 TX/phone vs. 2 TX/phone) The receivers (in a live system) have to be in the same device - because both signals are needed to calculate the amount of cross coupling. Transmitters don t! Hence MU-MIMO possible.

.at Least Two Transmitters & Two Receivers (e.g., How we measure and verify MIMO precoding) Infiniium Scope Dual MXAs Freq Ref. Trig. x4 BB or RF inputs x2 RF inputs Time, Freq and Phase Coherent Time and Freq Coherent

10 Things about MIMO The Agenda System Operation MIMO signal transmission and recovery Single and Multiple input measurements

3: MIMO Signal Recovery is a Two Step Process Step 1: Recover the channel coefficients (Real only) examples values are for a single OFDM subcarrier at one instant in time Need a robust signal format that uniquely identify each transmitter Step 2: Separate and demodulate the signals Use High school simultaneous equations to express T 0, T 1 in terms of R 0, R 1

MIMO Signal Recovery Recovering the channel coefficients via Reference Signals (RS) or Pilots! In WiMAX and LTE, specific subcarriers are allocated as pilots Their location is changed from symbol to symbol Their power is boosted to ensure errors from recovering the training signal do not dominate the demodulator performance

MIMO Signal Recovery Spectrum View The traces in this LTE signal show how the Reference Signals (pilots) are on different frequencies at any instant in time The spectrograms on the left show spectrum versus time (vertical axis) Unlike 802.16 OFDMA, the LTE RS is not present on all symbols

Channel Training Signals Vary with Technology Summary Table LTE WiMAX Wireless LAN Reference signals (pilots) use different subcarriers for each transmitter The QPSK Reference signals are transmitted every 3 rd or 4 th symbol, mixed with data BPSK Pilot subcarriers use different frequencies. Their positions vary symbol by symbol within a subframe, but are constant from frame to frame. Subcarrier coverage builds over several symbols, allowing interpolation Details depend on the zone type (e.g. PUSC, AMC) A preamble is used for training. The same subcarriers are used for all transmitters. Signals are separated by a CDMA code 4 orthogonal QPSK pilots are used (6 for 40MHz), sharing the same subcarriers. They are never transmitted without data HSPA+ uses code channels on the Common Pilot Channel, CPICH, with unique symbol bit patterns having different locations in the OVSF code domain

4: Transmit & Receive Phase Differences Don t Affect Open Loop MIMO Open Loop MIMO is a direct mapping technique In Open Loop MIMO, the communications channel does not utilize explicit information regarding the propagation channel. Common Open Loop MIMO techniques include Space Time Block Coding (STBC), Spatial Multiplexing (SM-MIMO) and Collaborative Uplink MIMO. In WiMAX systems MIMO Matrix A refers to the STBC technique and MIMO Matrix B refers to the SM-MIMO technique. Beamforming is an example of Closed Loop MIMO via Channel feedback to the TX (Streams)

Phase Differences Phase only matters if you couple the same signals Consider the case of an individual OFDM subcarrier (pilot) + = Summing different (e.g., pilots) signals the first time does not affect the individual components

Phase Differences but summing common signals + = leads to vector addition As may the case in Closed Loop MIMO (i.e., Beamforming)

Application to Test Limits of Receiver Performance Combine the coded signal with controlled impairments using the signal generators Differences in amplitude Timing Offset Frequency offsets Phase Noise Remember: Phase and Small Frequency Differences and Time Offsets are removed by the Tracking Processes in the Demodulator

N5182A Option 012: Phase Coherence Capability This configuration has the flexibility to expand to 3 or 4 generators Using separate generators, there is no constraint on RF frequency range Timing synchronization is dealt with by instrument firmware

5: BS and MS Antenna Configuration Has a Big Impact on the Channel Path Correlation Path correlation defines the coupling relationship between signals received at the antennas It is important because it affects how easy or difficult it is to recover the individual codewords (data streams) Each multipath item can have its own correlation factors

BS and MS Antenna Configuration Impact Example: The angle of departure from the BS antennas is typically narrower than the angle of arrival at the MS This gives the MS receivers the possibility of recovering different signals even if the antennas are closely spaced

BS and MS Antenna Configuration and Correlation The antenna configuration and correlation type determine the correlation matrices Path 1 Path 2 In this example, there are 6 paths, each with complex cross coupling coefficients Path 6

Impact of Antenna Configuration on Correlation High Correlation Low Correlation

N5106A PXB MIMO Receiver Tester The flexibility of the PXB is used to verify receiver performance throughout the design cycle, at baseband or RF Signal Inputs RF Signal Creation Tools Signal Outputs Analog I/Q - Direct from PXB - Connect to any DUT or RF vector signal generator with analog I/Q inputs Digital I/Q RF N5102A MXA Page 31 PXB ESG or MXG

Channel Matrix Condition Number Why it is important: a) A way to check your MIMO system is functioning correctly b) A short term indication of the CNR you need to recover a MIMO signal c) If the condition number is larger than the CNR of the signal, it is likely that MIMO separation of the multiple data streams will not work correctly. How you calculate it: Find the singular values of the channel matrix, and take the ratio of the highest / lowest Simple examples: A good channel A poor channel

CNR for 32% EVM 6: MIMO Needs Better Carrier/Noise (CNR) than SISO This graph compares the difference of additional CNR needed for MIMO vs. SISO as a function of Condition Number for equivalent EVM performance

CNR for 32% EVM MIMO Needs Better CNR than SISO Example: MIMO Signal w/condition Number = 10 requires ~7dB more (better) CNR than SISO for same EVM ~7dB

Example of MIMO versus SISO performance Introduce a delay in a static channel to make the channel condition number vary with frequency With a constant CNR, EVM gets worse as condition number increases Better not to use these subcarriers for MIMO

7: Precoding and Eigenbeamforming Couple the Transmit Signals to Suit the Channel Precoding can be very simple (LTE Codebook 0 is Direct Mapped) Some WLAN devices always apply Spatial Expansion (Eigen) beamforming is the general case, where the channel coefficients are mapped with higher resolution

The Reality of Precoding in 3GPP LTE Ripped from 3GPP TS 36.211 V8.1.0 (2007-11)

10 Things The Agenda System Operation MIMO signal transmission and recovery Single and Multiple input measurements

8: Cross Channel Measurements Can Be Made With a Single Input Analyzer The Reference signals (pilots) uniquely identify each transmitter We use this to allow measurements on each separately In LTE, the RS are not precoded. These measurements continue to work even when the signal is not direct mapped

Cross Channel Timing & Phase Measurement using a Power Combiner & Single Input Using a power combiner removes ANY uncertainty due to timing jitter or calibration The demodulation process recovers the time and phase relationship between the transmitters at the power combiner input Cable calibration may still be required

9: Condition Number Measures the Short Term MIMO Channel Performance How you calculate it: 1.15 0.39 0.26-1.03 1.15 0.26 0.39-1.03 THIS PART IS LEFT TO THE READER!

Ped. B Channel Condition number measurements Three channel samples at different times during the fading profile Lower overall condition number results in a tighter constellation

10: Distortion in One Component Can Degrade all the Data Streams If the data streams are precoded, each signal passes through both transmitters (receiver) chains One channel distorted Both streams affected A diversity signal hides the error

One Component can Degrade all the Streams We can use Ref Input Channel selection to separate these problems

Summary Intro System Operation 1: Cellular MIMO uses downlink and uplink differently 2: MIMO needs at least 2 transmitters and 2 receivers MIMO signal transmission and recovery 3: MIMO signal recovery is a 2 step process 4: Transmit & receive phase differences don t affect open loop MIMO 5: BS and MS antenna configuration has a big impact on path correlation 6: MIMO needs a better SNR than SISO 7: Precoding and eigenbeamforming couple the signals to suit the channel Single and Multiple input measurements 8: Cross channel measurements can be made with a single input analyzer 9: Condition number measures the short term channel performance 10: Distortion in one component can degrade all the data streams

The Poster Summarizes today s presentation

Additional Resources www.agilent.com/find/mimo MIMO WLAN PHY layer Operation and Measurement AN1509 http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5989-3443en.pdf Video: Single-channel measurements for WiMAX matrix A and B http://wireless.agilent.com/vcentral/viewvideo.aspx?vid=366 WiMAX Wave 2 Testing - MIMO & STC Agilent webcast 17 Jan 2008 http://www.techonline.com/learning/livewebinar/204203534

Questions? www/agilent.com/find/4gworld Excuse me, is this the Society for Asking Stupid Questions?