X-Band Linear Collider Report*

Similar documents
International Technology Recommendation Panel. X-Band Linear Collider Path to the Future. RF System Overview. Chris Adolphsen

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project. NLC Update. CLIC Group. CERN September D. L. Burke SLAC

High Gradient Studies at the NLC Test Accelerator (NLCTA)

Status of Warm-Cold Linear Collider Competition

LC Technology Hans Weise / DESY

The TESLA Linear Collider. Winfried Decking (DESY) for the TESLA Collaboration

Fabrication Techniques for the X-band Accelerator Structures. Juwen Wang WORKSHOP ON X-BAND RF TECHNOLOGY FOR FELs March 5, 2010

The ILC Accelerator Complex

The Art and Science of Making a Major Technical Decision Choosing the Technology for the International Linear Collider

Development of the X-band structure at Fermilab

Message from the Americas

Christopher Nantista ISG-X SLAC June 17, 2003

Accelerator Technology and High Gradient Collaboration

Engineering Challenges and Solutions for MeRHIC. Andrew Burrill for the MeRHIC Team

Maurizio Vretenar Linac4 Project Leader EuCARD-2 Coordinator

X-band Accelerator Structures R&D at SLAC

SOLID-STATE SWITCHING MODULATOR R&D FOR KLYSTRON

THE ORION PHOTOINJECTOR: STATUS and RESULTS

PROGRESS OF X-BAND ACCELERATING STRUCTURES

TECHNICAL CHALLENGES OF THE LCLS-II CW X-RAY FEL *

TESLA TeV Collider Project Overview

Performance of the Prototype NLC RF Phase and Timing Distribution System *

Multimoded RF Systems for Future Linear Colliders. Sami G. Tantawi

THE CRYOGENIC SYSTEM OF TESLA

Short report on the First ILC Workshop

Attosecond Diagnostics of Muti GeV Electron Beams Using W Band Deflectors

CLIC Compact Linear Collider

Progress in High Gradient Accelerator Research at MIT

Superstructures; First Cold Test and Future Applications

Demonstration of exponential growth and saturation at VUV wavelengths at the TESLA Test Facility Free-Electron Laser. P. Castro for the TTF-FEL team

Normal-conducting high-gradient rf systems

XFEL Cryo System. Project X Collaboration Meeting, FNAL September 8-9, 2010 Bernd Petersen DESY MKS (XFEL WP10 & WP13) 1 st stage. Possible extension

DESIGN AND BEAM DYNAMICS STUDIES OF A MULTI-ION LINAC INJECTOR FOR THE JLEIC ION COMPLEX

Overview of ERL Projects: SRF Issues and Challenges. Matthias Liepe Cornell University

ALICE SRF SYSTEM COMMISSIONING EXPERIENCE A. Wheelhouse ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory

The Next Linear Collider Test Accelerator s RF Pulse Compression and Transmission Systems

Development of a 20-MeV Dielectric-Loaded Accelerator Test Facility

TESLA Progress on R1 & R2 issues

Commissioning of the ALICE SRF Systems at Daresbury Laboratory Alan Wheelhouse, ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory ESLS RF 1 st 2 nd October 2008

The European Spallation Source. Dave McGinnis Chief Engineer ESS\Accelerator Division IVEC 2013

HIGH-GRADIENT TESTING OF SINGLE-CELL TEST CAVITIES AT KEK / NEXTEF

Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA Abstract

3 General layout of the XFEL Facility

FAST RF KICKER DESIGN

FLASH Operation at DESY From a Test Accelerator to a User Facility

ILC Reference Design Report Accelerator Executive Summary

Room Temperature High Repetition Rate RF Structures for Light Sources

H. Weise, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg, Germany for the XFEL Group

Physics Requirements Document Document Title: SCRF 1.3 GHz Cryomodule Document Number: LCLSII-4.1-PR-0146-R0 Page 1 of 7

Advance on High Power Couplers for SC Accelerators

SwissFEL Design and Status

RF Design of Normal Conducting Deflecting Cavity

High-field test at KEK

ILC Status. Time line SCRF status Test Facilities Design Improvement Summary Kaoru Yokoya IPAC2010 May , Kyoto. K.Yokoya, IPAC2010, Kyoto

Herwig Schopper CERN 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland. Introduction

Cavity BPMs for the NLC

Relativistic Klystron Two-Beam Accelerator Approach to Multi-TeV e+e- Linear Colliders*

On the RF system of the ILC

Thermionic Bunched Electron Sources for High-Energy Electron Cooling

HIGH POWER COUPLER FOR THE TESLA TEST FACILITY

Superconducting RF System. Heung-Sik Kang

Proposed Vibration Measurement Program In A Parallel Tunnel

FLASH at DESY. FLASH. Free-Electron Laser in Hamburg. The first soft X-ray FEL operating two undulator beamlines simultaneously

Use of Acoustic Emission to Diagnose Breakdown in Accelerator RF Structures * Abstract

Using Higher Order Modes in the Superconducting TESLA Cavities for Diagnostics at DESY

REVIEW OF HIGH POWER CW COUPLERS FOR SC CAVITIES. S. Belomestnykh

CEBAF Overview June 4, 2010

Drive Beam Photo-injector Option for the CTF3 Nominal Phase

DESY Project. Introduction. E Elsen

BPM requirements for energy spectrometry

Low-Level RF. S. Simrock, DESY. MAC mtg, May 05 Stefan Simrock DESY

Supporting Planning and Engineering Processes at XFEL Examples, Benefits and Experience

Fast Intra-Train Feedback Systems for a Future Linear Collider

Beam Diagnostics, Low Level RF and Feedback for Room Temperature FELs. Josef Frisch Pohang, March 14, 2011

Acceleration of High-Intensity Protons in the J-PARC Synchrotrons. KEK/J-PARC M. Yoshii

Precision RF Beam Position Monitors for Measuring Beam Position and Tilt Progress Report

Crab Cavity Systems for Future Colliders. Silvia Verdú-Andrés, Ilan Ben-Zvi, Qiong Wu (Brookhaven National Lab), Rama Calaga (CERN)

Development Status of KSTAR LHCD System

GROUND MOTION IN THE INTERACTION. ensured that the final focus quadrupoles on both. rms amplitudes higher than some fraction of the

Motivation: ERL based e linac for LHeC

Emilia Cruz. September 21, 2015

INSTALLATION AND FIRST COMMISSIONING OF THE LLRF SYSTEM

Detection of Beam Induced Dipole-Mode Signals in the SLC S-Band Structures* Abstract

Cavity BPM With Dipole-Mode Selective Coupler


ERL based FELs. Todd I Smith Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratories (HEPL) Stanford University Stanford, CA

Sensitivity to Nano-Tesla Scale Stray Magnetic Fields

A High Gradient Coreless Induction Method of Acceleration

RF STATUS OF SUPERCONDUCTING MODULE DEVELOPMENT SUITABLE FOR CW OPERATION: ELBE CRYOSTATS

Philippe Lebrun & Laurent Tavian, CERN

BEPCII-THE SECOND PHASE CONSTRUCTION OF BEIJING ELECTRON POSITRON COLLIDER

SNS LLRF Design Experience and its Possible Adoption for the ILC

Does the short pulse mode need energy recovery?

Accelerator Technology and High Gradient Collaboration

Strategy for the engineering integration of the ESS accelerator

Welcome Address to the ICFA Nanobeam 2002 Workshop

HIGH POWER INPUT COUPLERS FOR THE STF BASELINE CAVITY SYSTEM AT KEK

Studies of vacuum discharges in the CLIC accelerating structure

Project X Cavity RF and mechanical design. T. Khabiboulline, FNAL/TD/SRF

Illinois. I Physics. Investigation of TESLA Damping Ring Kickers using the A0 Photoinjector Beam

Transcription:

SLAC DOE Program Review X-Band Linear Collider Path to the Future X-Band Linear Collider Report* D. L. Burke NLC Program Director * Abstracted from recent presentations to the International Technical Recommendation Panel. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center June 2-4, 2004

Collaboration on X-Band Technology and Design Extension of conventional warm accelerator technology from 3 GHz (S-Band) to 11.4 GHz (X-Band). NLC JLC Led by BNL, FNAL, LBNL, LLNL, SLAC. Led by KEK, BINP, HEPL, PAL. Connected by SLAC-KEK R&D MOU signed in 1998. SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 2

Electron Evolution of a common Injector design strategy: NLC Zero-Order Design JLC Design Study (1996) (X) (S) (L) (UHF) RF Systems 11.424 GHz 2.856 GHz NLC DOE Lehman Review (1999) NLC Snowmass 2001 (2001) GLC Project Report (2003) GLC/NLC TRC (2003) 10-2000 1.428 GHz 0.714 GHz Positron Injector 560 m ~10 m 170 m 32 km 510 m 200 m 10 m 560 m Pre-Linac 6 GeV (S) Compressor 136 MeV (L) ~5 3.5 km 2 GeV (S) 6 GeV (S) 2 GeV (L) Pre-Damping Ring (UHF) 136 MeV (L) Compressor Pre-Linac 6 GeV (S) ~100 m 0.6 GeV (X) ~20 m Compressor e+ Damping Ring e (UHF) e Electron Main Linac 240-490 GeV (X) Two IRs Positron Main Linac 240-490 GeV (X) Damping Ring (UHF) ~20 m ~100 m 9.9 km Low E Detector e 9.9 km e+ Target e+ X-Band 250 GeV Linacs with TeV Technology Bypass Line and 50-250 GeV Tunnel Length for 500 GeV/Beam Compressor 0.6 GeV (X) Final Focus Dump ~500 m Hi E Detector Dump Final Focus Bypass Line 50-250 GeV Bypass Lines e.g. 50, 175, 250 GeV Injector Systems for 1.5 TeV 8047A611 SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 3

Energy for the Energy Frontier (GLC/NLC TRC 2003) 1350 CMS Energy (GeV) 1300 1250 1200 1150 1100 25 Bunches Luminosity / L 0 1050 192 Bunches 1000 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Luminosity L 0 (10 34 ) CMS Energy (GeV) A Partner for the LHC SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 4

The Challenges (Presentations to the ITRP) Luminosity (Raubenheimer) Beam Control Emittance and Stability Beam Power Energy and Cost Gradient and Efficiency (Adolphsen and Cornuelle) Availability Overhead and Margins Engineering and Design (Himel) SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 5

The Challenges (Presentations to the ITRP) Luminosity (Raubenheimer) Beam Control Emittance and Stability Beam Power Energy and Cost Gradient and Efficiency (Adolphsen and Cornuelle) Availability Overhead and Margins Engineering and Design (Himel) SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 6

Next Linear Collider Test Accelerator 1993 Construction began using first generation X-band components. 1997 Demonstrated 17% beam loading compensation in 1.8m structures at 40 MV/m. Demonstrated ability to reach 500 GeV cms. Powered by conventional PFN modulator. 1999 Added second klystron to each linac rf station. 2000- High gradient studies, and extension using second generation components aimed at 1 TeV cms. SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 7

The NLCTA (ca. 1997) SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 8

X-Band 1 TeV Baseline RF Unit SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 9

Cost Versus Gradient Linac cost is a balance between cost of the power sources (increases with gradient), and cost of accelerator length (decreases with gradient). Minimum occurs at about 80 MV/m where these are equal, but total collider cost is only 5% higher at 55 MV/m. Relative Total Cost* 1 TeV Baseline Baseline at 65 MV/m. (*The linac is about half the total cost of the collider.) SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 10

GLC/NLC Level I R&D Requirements (R1) 2003 Demonstration of SLED-II pulse compression system at design power level. Test of complete accelerator structure at design gradient with detuning and damping, including study of breakdown and dark current. Both R1 requirements have now been met. SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 11

Second Generation NLCTA (X-Band 1 TeV Baseline Demonstration) Load Tree 8-Pack RF Power Source Dual-Moded SLED II Pulse Compression Klystrons IGBT Solid-State Modulator SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 12

Solid State IGBT Modulator Test Stack SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 13

8-Pack IGBT Modulator 76 Cores Three-Turn Secondary > 1000 Hours of Operation Waveforms When Driving Four 50 MW Klystrons at 400 kv, 300 A Each SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 14

Features - 6.5 kv IGBTs with in-line multi-turn 1:10 transformer. - Industrialized cast casings. - Improved oil cooling. - Improved HV feed through. Next Generation: The Two-Pack 2-Pack Layout Bechtel-LLNL-SLAC Team A hybrid 2-Pack modulator is currently running in the SLAC Power Conversion Department lab. SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 15

Modulator Performance (1.6 µs Pulse Width) Config Load Voltage (kv) Current (A) Rate (Hz) Efficiency (%) 8-pack Water 500 1000 10 Achieved 8-Pack Four XL4 Klystrons 400 1200 60 58 2-Pack Hybrid Water 500 500 120 60 NLC/GLC Baseline 2-Pack Two PPM Klystrons 500 500 120 70 Prototype modulators operate at voltages and currents exceeding NLC/GLC requirements. 2-Pack efficiency is lower than goal due to hybrid transformer expect > 70% in next version with integrated transformer. SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 16

1 TeV X-Band Baseline RF Unit SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 17

X-Band Klystrons SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 18

PPM Klystron Overview PPM Klystrons being developed at SLAC, and at KEK in collaboration with Toshiba. 50 MW and 75 MW Tubes tested during past six years: Five at KEK/Toshiba. Six at SLAC. Two industrial (EEV and Toshiba). Two tubes to date have met NLC/GLC requirements (all key parameters concurrently). TRC R2 requirement of 120 Hz operation has been met. SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 19

PPM Klystron Performance (75 MW, 1.6 µs, 120/150 Hz, 55% Efficiency Required) KEK/Toshiba Two tubes tested at 75 MW with 1.6 ms pulses at 50 Hz (modulator limited). Efficiency = 53-56%. SLAC Two tubes tested at 75 MW with 1.6 ms pulses at 120 Hz. Efficiency = 53-54%. SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 20

1 TeV X-Band Baseline RF Unit SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 21

Second Generation SLED II at NLCTA TE 01 TE 02 TE 02 TE 01 For NLC/GLC, Use Dual Moded Delay Line to Reduce Delay Line Length in Half SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 22

Over-Height Planar Waveguide Lower Surface Electric Fields (< 50 MV/m) and Limited Pulse Heating (< 40 C) Example: Power Splitter SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 23

Solid-State Modulator and Dual-Mode SLED-II TRC R1 Done. Power 580 MW to loads (design is 475 MW) at 400 ns. Operated 300 hours at 510 MW, and over a 1000 at 320 MW. Turn-key with feedbacks. Output Power Klystron Power SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 24

1 TeV X-Band Baseline RF Unit SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 25

High Gradient Structure Development In 1999, discovered gradient limitations in original 1.8 m structures have since: Traveling-Wave Structure (60 cm) Tested 34 structures with over 20,000 hrs of high power operation at NLCTA. Improved structure preparation procedures chemical etching, high temperature firing, and high-power processing protocol. Found structures with lower input power (lower group velocity) more robust against damage from rf breakdown. Developed designs with low surface currents, optimized gradient profiles, and needed wakefield detuning and damping. SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 26

Structure Fabrication Inspection and Assembly at FNAL (Class 1000 Clean Room) Chemical Etching of Cells at KEK Hydrogen Brazing at SLAC Complete structures are assembled at FNAL, SLAC, and KEK with parts made in industry. Tests of first structures completely built in industry now beginning. SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 27

Processing Structures in NLCTA 80 50 100 170 240 400 ns = Pulse Width Gradient (MV/m) 70 60 50 40 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Hours of Operation SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 28

High Gradient Performance of Recent Structures Breakdown Rate at 60 Hz (#/hr) TRC R1 Done Average Rate Limit for 99% Availability (2% Overhead and 5 sec Station Recovery) Average Rate Goal Unloaded Gradient (MV/m) SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 29

System Demonstration and Operation From SLED II Phase 2a Power Eight Accelerator Structures in NLCTA (TRC R2 Requirement) Overmoded 6 db Phase 2b 4.8 db 3 db WR90 3 db 3 db 3 db 3 db First four structures continue to be powered by original NLCTA stations. Running 24/7 since first of April; 700 hours of operation with > 90% uptime SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 30

April Operation of NLCTA Structure Manufacturer Gradient (MV/m) Trip Rate (#/hr) H60vg4R17-1 SLAC 63.0 0.09 H60vg4R17-2 SLAC 62.0 0.14 H60vg3S17-FXC4 FNAL 60.8 0.13 H60vg3S17-FXC3 FNAL 59.9 0.09 H60vg3-FXB6 FNAL 60.6 0.03 H60vg3-FXB7 FNAL 62.4 0.07 H60vg4S17-1 KEK/SLAC 59.1 0.19 H60vg3R17 SLAC 60.6 0.07 Average 61.1 0.10 SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 31

May Operation of NLCTA (* = Installed first of May) TRC R2 Done Structure Manufacturer Gradient (MV/m) Trip Rate (#/hr) H60vg4S17-FXD1A * FNAL 65.5 0.31 H60vg3S17-FXC5 * FNAL 64.5 0.17 H60vg4S17-3 * KEK/SLAC 65.5 0.23 H60vg3S17-FXC3 FNAL 64.5 0.13 H60vg3-FXB6 FNAL 64.7 0.01 H60vg3-FXB7 FNAL 66.6 0.05 H60vg4S17-1 KEK/SLAC 63.1 0.21 H60vg3R17 SLAC 64.7 0.19 Average of All 8 64.9 0.16 Average of Original 5 (was 0.09 @ 60.5) 64.7 0.12 Performance improved with running time. SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 32

Expect Lower Rates During Beam Operation 75 Gradient (MV/m) 70 65 60 55 50 During Structure Testing Average = 65 MV/m During NLC/GLC Beam Operation Average = 52 MV/m 45 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Cell Number SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 33

Support for Industrialization (Ultimately to be planned by Global Design Organization.) Goals Fully utilize existing infrastructures and facilities. Provide intellectual ownership and experience with X-Band to those leading Main Linac work packages. Provide liaison and testing facilities for participating industries. Plan Extensions of GLCTA and NLCTA test facilities. Beams available for component and system testing. SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 34

Extension of NLCTA to 1 GeV (See also GLCTA.) Existing Modulator (With two 75 MW Permanent Magnet Klystrons.) Prototype 2-Pack (Now running in PC lab.) Dual Mode SLED Lines Existing NLCTA Extension Dual Mode SLED Lines Replace Stations 1 and 2 with New 2-Packs SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 35

The Challenges (Presentations to the ITRP) Luminosity (Raubenheimer) Beam Control Emittance and Stability Beam Power Energy and Cost Gradient and Efficiency Availability Overhead and Margins Engineering and Design (Adolphsen and Cornuelle) (Himel) Extended discussions in the afternoon break-out tour. SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 36

Polarized Electron Source SLC and SLAC ESA SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 37

SLAC and KEK physicists survey the ring. ATF Damping Ring at KEK Goal 2003 Laser Wire SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 38

IP Stabilization Three Layers 1. Site (many suitable sites identified) and facilities. 2. IR/Detector engineering and active (inertial) stabilization. 3. Fast intra-train beam feedback (FONT at NLCTA and FEATHER at ATF). SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 39

Site and Conventional Facilities Site Studies in CA and IL Measurements at the 8-Pack Los Angeles MTA Universal City SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 40

Beam Collision Stabilization Inertial Systems Inertial Sensor (SLAC) FONT at NLCTA (Oxford, Queen Mary) Demonstrated ~15x suppression of offsets. Latency was about 60 ns (c.f. 390 ns bunch train). SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 41

IP Stabilization Summary IP collisions can be stabilized with >90% of peak luminosity using any two out of the three approaches. Quiet Detector Active Stabilization FONT 20 nm No No 4 nm No No ~20 nm* Yes* No 20 nm No Yes 4 nm Yes No Simulations of Beam Collisions 4 nm No Yes 2/3 ~20 nm* Yes* Yes* * Measured 20 nm vibration on SLD. Demonstrated R&D solution. SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 42

IP SC Magnet Development at BNL New Nested Serpentine winding (based on HERA magnets). Allows continuous variation of the beam energy. Study vibrations introduced by cryogenic fluids. Prototype of the Final IP Quadrupole SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 43

Ready to Initiate International Linear Collider Project Baseline technologies and design are proven. Major improvements will come from value engineering and industrial design for manufacture, reliability, and serviceability. Industrial technologies readily and widely available. R&D will continue to look for ways to improve on the baseline e.g., better power efficiency with DLDS and support CDR/TDR engineering and design. SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 44

NLC Project Milestones Technically-Limited Schedule Independence of Sources, Damping Rings, Linacs, and Beam Delivery allow significant commissioning with beam during construction. SLAC DOE Program Review June 2-4, 2004 D. L. Burke 45