MAGNETIC LEVITATION DEMONSTRATION APPARATUS

Similar documents
DESIGN OF MAGNETIC LEVITATION DEMONSTRATION APPARTUS

California University of Pennsylvania Department of Applied Engineering & Technology Electrical Engineering Technology

Magnetic Suspension System Control Using Position and Current Feedback. Senior Project Proposal. Team: Gary Boline and Andrew Michalets

6.302 Feedback Systems

Addendum Handout for the ECE3510 Project. The magnetic levitation system that is provided for this lab is a non-linear system.


Low-Cost hardware connectivity with Simulink MATLAB-Day RWTH Aachen Sebastian Groß October 24th, 2013

Mag Lev Train 1. By: Paul Friend. Project Advisor: Dr. Anakwa. Date:

ME375 Lab Project. Bradley Boane & Jeremy Bourque April 25, 2018

Magnetic Levitation System

Department of Mechatronics Engineering

Direct Current Waveforms

P16551: Observer Calibrator. Antonio DoVale, Ben Grotton, Kevin Kruse, Alex Skinner, Zhen Zhou

ECET 211 Electric Machines & Controls Lecture 4-2 Motor Control Devices: Lecture 4 Motor Control Devices

العطاء رقم )7106/67( الخاص بشراء أجهز لقسم الهندسة الكهربائية على حساب البحث العلمي

Design and Simulation of a Hybrid Controller for a Multi-Input Multi-Output Magnetic Suspension System

2.017 DESIGN OF ELECTROMECHANICAL ROBOTIC SYSTEMS Fall 2009 Lab 4: Motor Control. October 5, 2009 Dr. Harrison H. Chin

Magnetic Bearing Literature Review. Team 2: The Floaters. Ivett Ortega, Wole Oyelola, Claudia Vargas

MODEL BASED DESIGN OF PID CONTROLLER FOR BLDC MOTOR WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF EMBEDDED ARDUINO MEGA CONTROLLER

Chapter Moving Charges and Magnetism

MathWorks Announces Built-in Simulink Support for Arduino, BeagleBoard, and LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT

Cornerstone Electronics Technology and Robotics I Week 17 Magnetism Tutorial

A Model Based Digital PI Current Loop Control Design for AMB Actuator Coils Lei Zhu 1, a and Larry Hawkins 2, b

Laboratory of Advanced Simulations

AERO2705 Space Engineering 1 Week 7 The University of Sydney

9/28/2010. Chapter , The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

A FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL APPROACH TO MAGNETIC LEVITATION

IT.MLD900 SENSORS AND TRANSDUCERS TRAINER. Signal Conditioning

Modeling a Hybrid Electric Vehicle and Controller to Optimize System Performance

Electronic Instrumentation and Measurements

DEGREE: Biomedical Engineering YEAR: TERM: 1

Sensors and Actuators Introduction to sensors

EE 482 : CONTROL SYSTEMS Lab Manual

MAGNETIC LEVITATION SUSPENSION CONTROL SYSTEM FOR REACTION WHEEL

FlexLab and LevLab: A Portable Lab for Dynamics and Control Teaching

Oscillator/Demodulator to Fit on Flexible PCB

Development of An Experimental Setup for the Altitude Control of A Ball in A Pipe Şeyma AKYÜREK 1,a,GizemSezin ÖZDEN 1,b, Coşku KASNAKOĞLU 1,c

Laboratory Infrastructure Facilities:

Smart Rocks and Wireless Communication Systems for Real- Time Monitoring and Mitigation of Bridge Scour (Progress Report No. 2)

Cornhole/Bags Electronic Scoring System

Design and Implementation of the Control System for a 2 khz Rotary Fast Tool Servo

UNIT II MEASUREMENT OF POWER & ENERGY

5. Transducers Definition and General Concept of Transducer Classification of Transducers

Coin Identification Using Eddy Currents

Using the V5.x Integrator

UNIT 4 VOCABULARY SKILLS WORK FUNCTIONS QUIZ. A detailed explanation about Arduino. What is Arduino? Listening

Mechatronics Chapter Sensors 9-1

CHAPTER 5 Test B Lsn 5-6 to 5-8 TEST REVIEW

DC Motor Speed Control using PID Controllers

Position Sensors. The Potentiometer.

AN ARDUINO CONTROLLED CHAOTIC PENDULUM FOR A REMOTE PHYSICS LABORATORY

PCB & Circuit Designing (Summer Training Program) 6 Weeks/ 45 Days PRESENTED BY

S.No Description/Specifications Qty 01. Post office box Trainer.

As before, the speed resolution is given by the change in speed corresponding to a unity change in the count. Hence, for the pulse-counting method

ME 5281 Fall Homework 8 Due: Wed. Nov. 4th; start of class.

Closed Loop Magnetic Levitation Control of a Rotary Inductrack System. Senior Project Proposal. Students: Austin Collins Corey West

Embedded Systems & Robotics (Winter Training Program) 6 Weeks/45 Days

Control Design for Servomechanisms July 2005, Glasgow Detailed Training Course Agenda

Control Servo Design for Inverted Pendulum

Introduction to Arduino HW Labs

Pre-Activity Quiz. 2 feet forward in a straight line? 1. What is a design challenge? 2. How do you program a robot to move

DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DIT UNIVERSITY, DEHRA DUN EA5210: POWER ELECTRONICS

Lab 5: Inverted Pendulum PID Control

The Research on Servo Control System for AC PMSM Based on DSP BaiLei1, a, Wengang Zheng2, b

Brushed DC Motor Microcontroller PWM Speed Control with Optical Encoder and H-Bridge

AP Physics C. Alternating Current. Chapter Problems. Sources of Alternating EMF

Analog Vs. Digital Weighing Systems

Unbalance Detection in Flexible Rotor Using Bridge Configured Winding Based Induction Motor

SECTION 6: ROOT LOCUS DESIGN

Using Magnetic Sensors for Absolute Position Detection and Feedback. Kevin Claycomb University of Evansville

Lab 1: Steady State Error and Step Response MAE 433, Spring 2012

Workshop 9: First steps in electronics

Sensors and Sensing Motors, Encoders and Motor Control

Sensors and Sensing Motors, Encoders and Motor Control

Introduction: Components used:

PART B. t (sec) Figure 1

Preliminary Proposal Accessible Manufacturing Equipment Team 2 10/22/2010 Felix Adisaputra Jonathan Brouker Nick Neumann Ralph Prewett Li Tian

Monitoring Temperature using LM35 and Arduino UNO

Embedded Robust Control of Self-balancing Two-wheeled Robot

GetTutorialized Workshops Brochure-2017

Techniques to reduce electromagnetic noise produced by wired electronic devices

BS-Electrical Engineering (Spring 1985) University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK

PHYSICS WORKSHEET CLASS : XII. Topic: Alternating current

Hardware Implementation of an Explorer Bot Using XBEE & GSM Technology

Mapping device with wireless communication

Program Your Robot to Perform a Task

School of Engineering Mechatronics Engineering Department. Experim. ment no. 1

TigreSAT 2010 &2011 June Monthly Report

Penn State Erie, The Behrend College School of Engineering

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL TRIAXIAL ACCELEROMETER MODEL PA-23 STOCK NO

Grain Moisture Detector for Industrial Applications

Exercise 7. Inductive Proximity Switches EXERCISE OBJECTIVE

Functional Specification for Wireless Ultrasonic Waterflow Monitoring System Project Team: Timbo Yuen Eric Lo Ehsan Arman Ye Lin Babak Razzaghi

Shock Sensor Module This module is digital shock sensor. It will output a high level signal when it detects a shock event.

Electromagnetic Can Crusher Victoria Meadows and Matthew Kundrock Advisor: Dr. Gore. Introduction

Inductive sensors. The operating principle is based on the following relationship: L=f(x) M=g(x)

Mechatronics Project Report

Inductive Proximity Detectors Technical Guide

Electronics and Instrumentation Name ENGR-4220 Fall 1999 Section Modeling the Cantilever Beam Supplemental Info for Project 1.

Chapter 30 Inductance, Electromagnetic. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Transcription:

MAGNETIC LEVITATION DEMONSTRATION APPARATUS TEAM 11 FALL TERM PRESENTATION Fuyuan Lin, Marlon McCombie, Ajay Puppala, Xiaodong Wang Project Supervisor : Dr. Robert Bauer Project Coordinator : Dr. Clifton Johnston 11/30/2013 Website: http://poisson.me.dal.ca/~dp_13_11/index.tml

OVERVIEW 2 Project Description Requirements Product Architecture Subsystems Alternative Design Concepts Design Selection Literature Review Circuit Design Current Progress Demonstration Future Considerations Testing &Verification Plan Budget Project Management Questions

Project Description 3 Design and build a magnetic levitating device Demonstrate different control theories taught in MECH 4900 Systems II course Project focuses on the control systems

Requirements 4 Demonstrative Requirements Levitate object magnetically Compare desired, simulated, manipulated and measured controller variables Lag, lead, lag- lead compensation techniques P, PI, and PID control Nyquist plots and Root Locus and Bode diagrams

Requirements 5 User Requirements: Implement the control methods in MathWorks Simulink Graphical User Interface (GUI) to interact with the device Plug n Play Safe and Ergonomic

Requirements 6 Visual Requirements: Viewable from back of the classroom 15 20 ft. Levitate object 2 4 cm away from coil Power Requirements: Conventional 120 VAC input No potential electrical risk to the user Operating Budget $1,500

Product Architecture 7 INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT Simulink Control Methods Current to electromagnet Execute Simulink Control Methods Object Levitation and Location Display Data Graphically Object Position Feedback Data from Sensor Functional black diagram for the magnetic levitation apparatus

Product Architecture 8 General Schematic of demonstration device

Subsystems 9 Electromagnetic Levitation: Pseudo Levitation Rotational Stabilization Electromagnetic Electrodynamic (Eddy Currents) Diamagnetic (Meissner Effect) Rotational Stabilization (picture courtesy of futuristicnews.com) Transrapid Monorail (picture courtesy of maglev.net) Electrodynamic Levitation (picture courtesy of microwavesoft.com)

Subsystems 10 Electromagnetic Levitation: Type of Levitation Active or Passive Stability of Levitation Availability of Materials Range of Levitation Ease to Build Pseudo Levitation Passive N/A N/A N/A N/A - Rotational Active 2 3 5 3 13 Stabilization Electromagnetic Active 3 5 4 5 17 Electrodynamic Active 5 4 4 3 16 Diamagnetic Passive N/A N/A N/A N/A - Total

Subsystems 11 Levitated Object: Material: Chrome steel, Regular steel, Neodymium, or Composite materials Shape: Rectangular prism, Circular disk, Solid sphere, or Hollow sphere Motion: Horizontal, Vertical, or Angled

Subsystems 12 Sensors: Magnetic sensor Hall Effect sensor Electric sensor Inductive Proximity sensor Capacitive Displacement sensor Optical sensor Optical Proximity sensor Photoelectric sensor Frequency based Sensor Ultrasonic sensor Hall Effect sensor (picture courtesy of micropac.com) Photoelectric sensor (picture courtesy of directindustry.com) Inductive Proximity sensor (picture courtesy of asi-ez.com) Ultrasonic sensor (picture courtesy of letsmakerobots.com)

Subsystems 13 Sensors: Sensor Range of Detection Unit Cost Resistance to Interference Microcontroller Compatibility Size Testing & Configuration Hall effect 4 4 4 4 4 5 25 Ultrasonic 4 1 2 3 3 3 16 Inductive proximity 1 3 2 3 3 3 15 Capacitive displacement 1 2 2 3 3 3 14 Photoelectric 3 3 4 4 3 5 22 Optical proximity 4 3 3 3 3 3 22 Reflective 4 4 3 3 3 3 20

Subsystems 14 Microcontrollers: LEGO Mindstorms NXT 2.0 Arduino Altera DE2 BeagleBoard Raspberry Pi LEGO Mindstorms NXT 2.0 (picture courtesy of arstechnica.com) Arduino (picture courtesy of arduino.cc)

Subsystems Summary 15 Levitation Technique Permanent Magnets Object Material Shape Motion Chrome Steel Rectangular prism Electromagnetic Regular Steel Circular disk Vertical Microcontroller Sensor Horizontal Arduino Hall Effect LEGO Mindstorm NXT 2.0 Reflective Electrodynamics Neodymium Solid sphere Angled BeagleBoard Optical Proximity Superconducting Composite Hollow sphere Altera DE2 Photoelectric Diamagnetic Raspberry Pi Capacitive Displacement Inductive Proximity Ultrasonic

Alternative Design Concepts 16 Concept 1 Electromagnetic Suspension Single Electromagnet with Hall Effect Sensor PRONS Simple and easy to build CONS Small variations in position of the levitating object is possible Position and field strength comparison table

Alternative Design Concepts 17 Concept 2 Electromagnetic Suspension Single Electromagnet with Photoelectric Sensor PRONS Accurate sensing of the object position CONS Small variations in position of the levitating object is possible

Alternative Design Concepts 18 Concept 3 Electromagnetic Suspension Double Electromagnet Design PRONS Extends the range of magnetic field CONS Stability of levitation Building and testing for functionality

Alternative Design Concepts 19 Concept 4 Electrodynamic Replusion Multiple coil parallel arrangement PRONS Levitating object attains stability easier compared to suspension Higher range for levitation CONS Difficult to build and test the device Display problems

Alternative Design Concepts 20 Concept 5 Vertical Maglev Track PRONS Motion of the levitating disk is properly constrained CONS May look like disk is supported by the tracks May cost more to build the device

Alternative Design Concepts 21 Concept 6 Torodial Design PRONS Higher efficiency required for sensitive circuitry Dynamic system CONS Limited power capacity to distribute to 4 coils Requires molding of transparent plastic Cost to build is very high compared to other systems

Design Selection 22 Criteria for Selection Project Requirements (60% weightage) Viewability & Stability of the levitating object Power input MATLAB Simulation General Requirement (20% weightage) Electromagnet, sensor, and microprocessor Total displacement levitating object Apparatus chassis

Design Selection 23 Criteria for Selection Design Assessment (10% weightage) Complexity and ease to build Holistic judgment Cost Assessment (10% weightage) Cost of parts Cost to build the frame

Design Selection 24 1. Single Electromagnet with Hall Effect Sensor 3. Double Electromagnet Design 5. Maglev Track Design 2. Single Electromagnet with Photoelectric Sensor 4. Multiple Coil Parallel Arrangement 6. Torodial Design

Literature Review 25 Electromagnetic Levitation: Magnetic field needed to levitate the object B = 2 μ o F object A Magnetizing force in the air gap Magnetic field generated by the current carrying coil (picture courtesy of superconductor.solidchem.net) Thus, current I = mmf N H = B μ o = H l N

Literature Review 26 Electromagnet Design Considerations: Few assumptions for the air gap, length, and diameter of the solenoid and the levitating object. Excel optimization gives: B = 0.003 wb/m 2 I = 0.143 A L = 12.29 m = 40 ft Gage 30 wire was selected. 0.32 Ω wire resistance and atleast 0.23 V needed for given air gap.

How It Works 27 Circuit Design Electromagnetic coil driving circuit Sensor with amplifier circuit (Mekonikuv)

How It Works 28 Coil Driver Circuit

How It Works 29 Sensor Amplifier Circuit

Current Progress 30 Finished circuit building

Current Progress 31 Testing of Ardunio: LED blinking

Demonstration 32 Upload code Plot Data Receive Data Schematic for demonstration

Future Considerations 33 Simulink Block diagram for Electromagnetic Levitation Simulink block diagram for Arduino support

Future Considerations 34 Final Apparatus

Testing & Verification Plan 35 1. Different materials and shapes for levitating object 2. Electromagnets made from wire and different core materials 3. Simulink block diagram and communication with the Arduino 4. Control levitation using Arduino and Simulink

Budget 36 Materials Main Components Arduino, Hall Effect sensor, Electromagnet Circuit Resistor, Capacitors, Power supply Chassis Raw Materials Wood, Nails, Sheet Metal, etc Cost $ 200.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 SubTotal $400.00 Tax (15%) $ 60.00 Shipping cost $ 150.00 10% Contingency $ 61.00 Total $ 671.00

Project Management 37 Task Name Duration Finish Responsibility Gather Parts 2 days 1 st week January Marlon & Ajay 15% Review Fall Report 1 day 1 st week January Group task 0% Building Phase Prototype Testing 3 days 1 st -2 nd week January Marlon & Xiadong 30% Complete Simulink Block Diagram 7 days 2 nd -3 rd week January Fuyuan & Ajay 25% Implement Control Theories 4 days 3 rd week January Group 0% Build GUI using Simulink 4 days 4 th week January Fuyuan & Ajay 0% Build Stand & Electromagnet 3 days 4 th week January Xiadong 5% Rebuild circuitry 1 day 4 th week January Marlon 45% System Integration 5 days 2 nd week February Group task 0% Testing Phase Set up System in Lab 3 days 2 nd week February Group task 0% Testing system 15 days 3 rd 4 th wk. February Group task 0% Collect and Sample data 10 days 1 st -3 rd week March Scheduling 0% Test completion 2 days 4 th week March Marlon & Ajay 0% Deliverables Build Report 4 days February Group task 20% Website 2 days 1 st week April Ajay 15% Final Report 4 days 1 st week April Group task 15% Final Presentations 2 days 1 st week April Group task 10% Summary of project tasks for winter term 2014 % Work Completed

Acknowledgements 38 Dr. Y.J. Pan Mechanical Dept. Professor Dr. Timothy Little Electrical Dept. Professor Al-Mokhtar O. Mohamed Post-Doctoral Position Mech. Dept. Jonathan MacDonald Electrical Technician Angus MacPherson Mechanical Technician

References 39 Arduino UNO webpage. http://arduino.cc/en/main/arduinoboarduno. Retrieved Nov. 20, 2013 ATmega238 datasheet. http://www.atmel.com/images/doc8161.pdf. Retrieved Nov. 20, 2013 Honeywell SS49 datasheet. http://www.wellsve.com/sft503/counterpoint3_1.pdf. Retrieved Nov. 20, 2013 "RobotShop : The World's Leading Robot Store." RobotShop. N.p., n.d. Sat. 03 Nov. 2013 MathWorks MATLAB/Simulink website. http://www.mathworks.com/products/simulink/. Retrieved Nov. 20, 2013 Mikonikuv Blog, Arduino Magnet Levitation detailed description. http://mekonik.wordpress.com/2009/03/17/arduino-magnet-levitation/. Retrieved Nov. 20, 2013 Williams, Lance. "Electromagnetic Levitation Thesis." N.p., 2005. Web. 28 Oct. 2013.

END OF PRESENTATION Thank you. Questions? Website: http://poisson.me.dal.ca/~dp_13_11/index.tml