Smart antenna technology

Similar documents
ADAPTIVE ANTENNAS. NARROW BAND AND WIDE BAND BEAMFORMING

6 Uplink is from the mobile to the base station.

Smart Antenna ABSTRACT

K.NARSING RAO(08R31A0425) DEPT OF ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING (NOVH).

ADAPTIVE ANTENNAS. TYPES OF BEAMFORMING

EFFICIENT SMART ANTENNA FOR 4G COMMUNICATIONS

SIMULATIONS OF ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS FOR SPATIAL BEAMFORMING

Advanced Antenna Technology

SNS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING COIMBATORE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY QUESTION BANK

Advanced Communication Systems -Wireless Communication Technology

Performance Study of A Non-Blind Algorithm for Smart Antenna System

Smart Antennas for wireless communication

Indian Journal of Engineering

Capacity Enhancement in Wireless Networks using Directional Antennas

A STUDY OF ADAPTIVE BEAMFORMING TECHNIQUES USING SMART ANTENNA FOR MOBILE COMMUNICATION

Analysis of LMS and NLMS Adaptive Beamforming Algorithms

Multiple Antenna Techniques

ADAPTIVE BEAMFORMING USING LMS ALGORITHM

GTBIT ECE Department Wireless Communication

Performance Analysis of MUSIC and LMS Algorithms for Smart Antenna Systems

Abstract. Marío A. Bedoya-Martinez. He joined Fujitsu Europe Telecom R&D Centre (UK), where he has been working on R&D of Second-and

Advances in Radio Science

Multiple Antenna Processing for WiMAX

NEURAL NETWORK BASED ROBUST ADAPTIVE BEAMFORMING FOR SMART ANTENNA SYSTEM

Performance improvement in beamforming of Smart Antenna by using LMS algorithm

CHAPTER 10 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 10.1 Conclusions

Multiple Access Techniques for Wireless Communications

INTERFERENCE REJECTION OF ADAPTIVE ARRAY ANTENNAS BY USING LMS AND SMI ALGORITHMS

ISHIK UNIVERSITY Faculty of Science Department of Information Technology Fall Course Name: Wireless Networks

EENG473 Mobile Communications Module 2 : Week # (8) The Cellular Concept System Design Fundamentals

Beamforming for 4.9G/5G Networks

NOISE, INTERFERENCE, & DATA RATES

UNIT 4 Spread Spectrum and Multiple. Access Technique

CDMA - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

All Beamforming Solutions Are Not Equal

CHAPTER 2 WIRELESS CHANNEL

Direction of Arrival Estimation in Smart Antenna for Marine Communication. Deepthy M Vijayan, Sreedevi K Menon /16/$31.

Keywords: Adaptive Antennas, Beam forming Algorithm, Signal Nulling, Performance Evaluation.

Introduction to Wireless and Mobile Networking. Hung-Yu Wei g National Taiwan University

URL: < /isape >

INTRODUCTION 1.1 SOME REFLECTIONS ON CURRENT THOUGHTS

Chapter 7 Multiple Division Techniques for Traffic Channels

Lecture 9: Spread Spectrum Modulation Techniques

Analysis of RF requirements for Active Antenna System

A NOVEL DIGITAL BEAMFORMER WITH LOW ANGLE RESOLUTION FOR VEHICLE TRACKING RADAR

By Nour Alhariqi. nalhareqi

Wireless Transmission & Media Access

Chapter 4 DOA Estimation Using Adaptive Array Antenna in the 2-GHz Band

Data and Computer Communications. Chapter 10 Cellular Wireless Networks

S.D.M COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

WHITE PAPER. Hybrid Beamforming for Massive MIMO Phased Array Systems

SMART ANTENNA ARRAY PATTERNS SYNTHESIS: NULL STEERING AND MULTI-USER BEAMFORMING BY PHASE CONTROL

CHAPTER 2. Instructor: Mr. Abhijit Parmar Course: Mobile Computing and Wireless Communication ( )

Adaptive Antennas. Randy L. Haupt

Deployment scenarios and interference analysis using V-band beam-steering antennas

From Adaptive Antennas to MIMO Systems and Beyond

Multiple Access. Difference between Multiplexing and Multiple Access

LTE Radio Channel Emulation for LTE User. Equipment Testing

Chapter - 1 PART - A GENERAL INTRODUCTION

Radio Receiver Architectures and Analysis

MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (650520) Part 3

INTRODUCTION. Basic operating principle Tracking radars Techniques of target detection Examples of monopulse radar systems

(8+8) 6. (a) Explain the following in detail concern to the mobile system?

SPLIT MLSE ADAPTIVE EQUALIZATION IN SEVERELY FADED RAYLEIGH MIMO CHANNELS

Switched parasitic antennas and cxontrolled reactance parasitic antennas: a systems comparison

DIRECTION OF ARRIVAL ESTIMATION IN WIRELESS MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS USING MINIMUM VERIANCE DISTORSIONLESS RESPONSE

Some Notes on Beamforming.

Optimizing Satellite Communications with Adaptive and Phased Array Antennas

Interference Reduction in Wireless Communication Using Adaptive Beam Forming Algorithm and Windows

IMPROVED CMA: A BEAMFORMING ALGORITHMS FOR WIRELESS SYSTEM USING SMART ANTENNA

A Glimps at Cellular Mobile Radio Communications. Dr. Erhan A. İnce

Adaptive Array Beamforming using LMS Algorithm

Multiple Access Schemes

MULTIPLE ACCESS SCHEMES OVERVIEW AND MULTI - USER DETECTOR

Smart Antenna Techniques and Their Application to Wireless Ad Hoc Networks

Fig(1). Basic diagram of smart antenna

Adaptive DS/CDMA Non-Coherent Receiver using MULTIUSER DETECTION Technique

Chapter- 5. Performance Evaluation of Conventional Handoff

Noncoherent Communications with Large Antenna Arrays

Ten Things You Should Know About MIMO

Exercise 1-3. Radar Antennas EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE DISCUSSION OF FUNDAMENTALS. Antenna types

Simple Algorithm in (older) Selection Diversity. Receiver Diversity Can we Do Better? Receiver Diversity Optimization.

Null-steering GPS dual-polarised antenna arrays

Smart antenna for doa using music and esprit

Mobile and Personal Communications. Dr Mike Fitton, Telecommunications Research Lab Toshiba Research Europe Limited

Radiation Analysis of Phased Antenna Arrays with Differentially Feeding Networks towards Better Directivity

Wireless Communication

Analysis of Direction of Arrival Estimations Algorithms for Smart Antenna

A LITERATURE REVIEW IN METHODS TO REDUCE MULTIPLE ACCESS INTERFERENCE, INTER-SYMBOL INTERFERENCE AND CO-CHANNEL INTERFERENCE

First generation mobile communication systems (e.g. NMT and AMPS) are based on analog transmission techniques, whereas second generation systems

Systematic comparison of performance of different Adaptive beam forming Algorithms for Smart Antenna systems

Performance Analysis of MUSIC and MVDR DOA Estimation Algorithm

Spread Spectrum. Chapter 18. FHSS Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum DSSS Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum DSSS using CDMA Code Division Multiple Access

UNIT-II 1. Explain the concept of frequency reuse channels. Answer:

RADIO RECEIVERS ECE 3103 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

Spread Spectrum Modulation

Access Methods and Spectral Efficiency

Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors in Array Antennas. Optimization of Array Antennas for High Performance. Self-introduction

Level 6 Graduate Diploma in Engineering Wireless and mobile communications

TRAINING OBJECTIVE. RF Planning Training Course will show the attendees how to plan, design and optimize networks efficiently.

Transcription:

Smart antenna technology In mobile communication systems, capacity and performance are usually limited by two major impairments. They are multipath and co-channel interference [5]. Multipath is a condition which arises when a transmitted signal undergoes reflection from various obstacles in the propagation environment. This gives rise to multiple signals arriving from different directions. Since the multipath signals follow different paths, they have different phases when they are arrive at the receiver. The result is degradation in signal quality when they are combined at the receiver due to the phase mismatch. Co-channel interference is the interference between two signals that operate at the same frequency. In cellular communication the interference is usually caused by a signal from a different cell occupying the same frequency band. Smart antenna is one of the most promising technologies that will enable a higher capacity in wireless networks by effectively reducing multipath and co-channel interference [3], [4], [5], [6]. This is achieved by focusing the radiation only in the desired direction and adjusting itself to changing traffic conditions or signal environments. Smart antennas employ a set of radiating elements arranged in elements are the form of an array. The signals from these combined to form a movable or switchable beam pattern that follows the desired user. In a Smart

antenna system the arrays by themselves are not smart, it is the digital signal processing that makes them smart. The process of combining the signals and then focusing the radiation in a particular direction is often referred to as digital beamforming [3], [4]. This term will be extensively used in the following sections. 26The early smart antenna systems were designed for use in military applications to suppress interfering or jamming signals from the enemy [15]. Since interference suppression was a feature in this system, this technology was borrowed to wireless apply to personal communications where interference was limiting network could the number of users that a handle. It is a major challenge to apply smart antenna technology to personal wireless communications since the traffic is denser. Also, the time available for complex computations is limited. However, the advent of powerful, low-cost, digital processing components and the development of software-based techniques has made smart antenna systems a practical reality for cellular communications systems. 4.1 Types of Smart Antenna Systems There are basically two approaches [3], [4], [5], [7], [14], [15] to implement antennas that dynamically change their antenna pattern to mitigate interference and multipath affects while increasing coverage and range. They are Switched beam

Adaptive Arrays The Switched beam approach is simpler compared to the fully adaptive approach. It provides a considerable increase in network capacity when compared to traditional omnidirectional antenna systems or sector-based systems. In this approach, an antenna array generates overlapping beams that cover the surrounding area as shown in figure 4.1. When an incoming signal is detected, the base station determines the beam that is best aligned in the signal-of-interest direction and then switches to that beam to communicate with the user. 27Figure 4.1 Beam formation for switched beam antenna system [15] The Adaptive array system is the smarter of the two approaches. This system tracks the mobile user continuously by steering the main beam towards the user and at the same time forming nulls in the directions of the interfering signal as shown in figure 4.2. Like switched beam systems, they also incorporate arrays. Typically, the received signal from each of the spatially distributed antenna elements is multiplied by a weight. The weights are complex in nature and adjust the amplitude and phase. These signals are combined to yield the array output. These complex weights are computed by a complicated adaptive algorithm, which is preprogrammed into the digital signal-processing unit that manages the signal radiated by the base station. Figure 4.2 Beam formation for adaptive array antenna system [15] 284.2 Switched Beam Systems

This type of adaptive technique actually does not steer or scan the beam in the direction of the desired signal. Switched beam employs an antenna array which radiates several overlapping fixed beams covering a designated angular area. It subdivides the sector into many narrow beams. Each beam can be treated as an individual sector serving an individual user or a group of users. Consider a traditional cellular area shown below in figure 4.3 that is divided into three sectors with 120 angular width, with each sector served by six directional narrow beams. The spatially separated directional beams leads to increase in the possible reuse of a frequency channel by reducing potential interference and also increases the range. These antennas do not have a uniform gain in all directions but when compared to a conventional antenna system they have increased gain in preferred directions. The Switched beam antenna has a switching mechanism that enables it to select and then switch the right beam which gives the best reception for a mobile user under consideration. The selection is usually based on maximum received power for that user. Note that same beam can be used both for uplink and downlink communication. Figure 4.3 Switched beam coverage pattern 29A typical switched beam system for a base station would consists of multiple arrays with

each array covering a certain sector in the cell. Consider a switched beamforming system shown in figure 4.4. It consists of a phase shifting network, which forms multiple beams looking in certain directions. The RF switch actuates the right beam in the desired direction. The selection of the right beam is made by the control logic. The control logic is governed by an algorithm which scans all the beams and selects the one receiving the strongest signal based on a measurement made by the detector. θ Phase Shifting N/W Detector Output RF Switch Control Logic Figure 4.4 Block diagram of Switched beam systems This technique is simple in operation but is not suitable for high interference areas. Let us consider a scenario where User 1 who is at the side-edge of the beam which he is being served by. If a second user were at the direction of the null then there would be no interference but if the second user moves into the same area of the beam as the first user he could cause interference to the first user. Therefore switched beam systems are best suited for a little or zerointerference environment. In case of a multipath signal there is a chance that the system would switch the beam to

the indirect path signal rather than the direct path signal coming from the user. This leads to the ambiguity in the perception of the direction of the received signal, thus, switched beam systems are only used for the reception of signals. Since these antennas have a non-uniform gain between 30the beams the mobile user when moving away from the edge of the beam is likely to suffer from a call loss before he is handed of to the next beam because there is no beam serving that area. Also, these systems lead to frequent hand-offs when the mobile user is actively moving from the area of one beam to another. Therefore these intra-cell hand-offs have to be controlled. Switched beam systems cannot reduce multipath interference components with a direction of arrival close to that of the desired signal. Despite of all these disadvantages, the switched beam approach is less complicated (compared to the completely adaptive systems) and provides a significant range extension, increase in capacity, and a considerable interference rejection when the desired user is at the center of the beam. Also, it less expensive and can be easily implemented in older systems. Different approaches can be used to provide the fixed beams in a Switched Beam system. Some of them are discussed below which use fixed phase shifting networks: 4.2.1 Butler Matrix Arrays In this approach a Butler Matrix [5], [15] is used to provide the necessary phase shift for a linear antenna array. A butler matrix can produce beams looking in different directions

with an N-element array. A butler matrix requires an ( 90 hybrids interconnected by rows of N N ( / N N N 2)(log / 2) log ( ) N 2 N ( ) 1) N 2 N fixed phase shifters to form the beam pattern. When a signal impinges upon the input port of the Butler Matrix, it produces a different interelement phase shifts between the output ports. The set of different inter-element phase shifts is given by: ( ) N k 2 2 1 π φ = ± k [ ] 1, N Where N is the number of ports of the matrix. Consider the 8 Butler matrix array shown in figure 4.5. It consists of twelve 90 hybrids and eight fixed phase shifters that form a beam forming network. When one of the input ports is excited by an RF signal, all the output ports feeding the array elements are equally

excited but with a progressive phase between them. This results in the radiation of the beam at a certain angle. For example if the 2R beam needs to be activated then the 2R input port needs to be activated. If multiple beams are required, two or more input ports need to be excited 8 31simultaneously. Figure 4.6 shows the radiation of two beams 1R and 3L, which is achieved by simultaneous excitation of input ports 1R and 3L. Each beam can have a dedicated transmitter and/or receiver, or a single transmitter and/or receiver and the appropriate beam can be selected using an RF switch as mentioned earlier. Antenna Ports A1 A5 A2 A6 A3 A7 A4 A8 90 Hybrid Phase Shifters 1L 4R 3L 2R 2L 3R 4L 1R Tx/Rx Ports Figure 4.5 8 8 Butler Matrix array Figure 4.6 Radiation pattern for 8 8 Butler Matrix array [15] 32The Butler matrix is one of the most popular switched beam networks. It is easy to implement and requires few components to build compared to other networks. The loss involved is very small, which comes from the insertion loss in hybrids, phase shifters and transmission lines. However in a butler matrix, beamwidth and beam angles tend to vary with frequency

causing the beam squint with frequency. Also, as the matrices get bigger, more and more crossovers make interconnections complex. 4.2.2 Blass Arrays The Blass matrix uses directional couplers and transmission lines to provide the necessary phase shift for the arrays in order to produce multiple beams. Figure 4.7 shows an 8- element array fed by a Blass Matrix. Each node is the direction coupler to crossconnect the transmission lines. Port 0 provides equal delays to all elements and hence produces a broad side beam, whereas other ports provide progressive time delays between elements and hence produces beams at different angles. Therefore, when you send signal into the different inputs, you will get different steering angles. The Blass Matrix, is simple but has a low performance because its loss is attributed to the resistive terminations. Beam Ports (Signal in) Terminator directional coupler 1 θ θ 2 θ 3

M θ........ 0 θ No.M No.0 No.1........ τ τ m steering normal angle wavefront antenna array Figure 4.7 Blass Matrix beam forming network 33The Blass matrix is simple in the sense that it has simpler interconnection layout of the circuit since it does not involve any crossovers as in Butler matrix. There is no beam squinting with frequency. However they require more components compared to the Butler matrix, which makes it costlier and heavier.

4.3 Adaptive Array Systems From the previous discussion it was quite apparent that switched beam systems offer limited performance enhancement when compared to conventional antenna systems in wireless communication. However, greater performance improvements can be achieved by implementing advanced signal processing techniques to process the information obtained by the antenna arrays. Unlike switched beam systems, the adaptive array systems are really smart because they are able to dynamically react to the changing RF environment. They have a multitude of radiation patterns compared to fixed finite patterns in switched beam systems to adapt to the everchanging RF environment. An Adaptive array, like a switched beam system uses antenna arrays but it is controlled by signal processing. This signal processing steers the radiation beam towards a desired mobile user, follows the user as he moves, and at the same time minimizes interference arising from other users by introducing nulls in their directions. This is illustrated in a simple diagram shown below in figure 4.8. Figure 4.8 Beam formation for adaptive array antenna system The adaptive array systems are really intelligent in the true sense and can actually be referred to as smart antennas. The smartness in these systems comes from the intelligent digital 34processor that is incorporated in the system. The processing is mainly governed by complex computationally intensive algorithms. 4.3.1 Basic Working Mechanism

A smart antenna system can perform the following functions: first the direction of arrival of all the incoming signals including the interfering signals and the multipath signals are estimated using the Direction of Arrival algorithms. Secondly, the desired user signal is identified and separated from the rest of the unwanted incoming signals. Lastly a beam is steered in the direction of the desired signal and the user is tracked as he moves while placing nulls at interfering signal directions by constantly updating the complex weights. As discussed previously in the section of phased arrays it is quite evident that the direction of radiation of the main beam in an array depends upon the phase difference between the elements of the array. Therefore it is possible to continuously steer the main beam in any direction by adjusting the progressive phase difference β between the elements. The same concept forms the basis in adaptive array systems in which the phase is adjusted to achieve maximum radiation in the desired direction. To have a better understanding of how an adaptive array system works, let us consider a typical adaptive digital beamforming network shown below in figure 4.9. Processor W1 Adaptive Algorithm WN

W2 ADC ADC ADC D/C D/C D/C To the Demodulator ADC =Analog to digital converter D/C = Down Converter W s = Complex weights Figure 4.9 Block diagram of Adaptive array systems 35In a beamforming network typically the signals incident at the individual elements are combined intelligently to form a single desired beamformed output. Before the incoming signals are weighted they are brought down to baseband or intermediate frequencies (IF s). The receivers provided at the output of each element perform the necessary frequency down conversion. Adaptive antenna array systems use digital signal processors (DSP s) to weight the incoming signal. Therefore it is required that the down-converted signal be converted into digital format before they are processed by the DSP. Analog-to-digital converters (ADC s) are provided

for this purpose. For accurate performance, they are required to provide accurate translation of the RF signal from the analog to the digital domain. The digital signal processor forms the heart of the system, which accepts the IF signal in digital format and the processing of the digital data is driven by software. The processor interprets the incoming data information, determines the complex weights (amplification and phase information) and multiplies the weights to each element output to optimize the array pattern. The optimization is based on a particular criterion, which minimizes the contribution from noise and interference while producing maximum beam gain at the desired direction. There are several algorithms based on different criteria for updating and computing the optimum weights. 4.3.2 Adaptive Algorithm Classifications The adaptive algorithms can be classified into categories based on different approaches [11]. Based on adaptation 1. Continuous adaptation: algorithms based on this approach adjust the weights as the incoming data is sampled and keep updating it such that it converges to an optimal solution. This approach is suitable when the signal statistics are time varying. Examples: The Least Mean Square (LMS) algorithm, and the Recursive Least square (RLS) algorithm. 362. Block adaptation: algorithms based on this approach compute the weights based on the

estimates obtained from a temporal block of data. This method can be used in a nonstationary environment provided the weights are computed periodically. Example: The Sample Matrix Inversion (SMI) algorithm Based on information required: 1. Reference signal based algorithms: These types of algorithms are based on minimization of the mean square error between the received signal and the reference signal. Therefore it is required that a reference signal be available which has high correlation with the desired signal. Examples: The Least Mean Square (LMS) algorithm, The Recursive Least square (RLS) algorithm and the Sample Matrix Inversion (SMI) algorithm The reference signal [3], [9], [11] is not the actual desired signal, in fact it is a signal that closely represents it or has strong correlation with it. Reference signals required for the above algorithms are generated in several ways. In TDMA every frame consists of a sequence, which can be used as a reference signal. In digital communication, synchronization signals can be used for the same purpose. 2. Blind adaptive algorithms: These algorithms do not require any reference signal information. They themselves generate the required reference signal from the received signal to get the desired signal. Examples: The Constant Modulus Algorithm (CMA), The Cyclostationary algorithm, and the Decision-Directed algorithm The above-mentioned examples and more will be further discussed in a brief manner next

in the Adaptive Beamforming section. 374.4 Comparison between switched beam and adaptive array systems Switched beam system It uses multiple fixed directional beams with narrow beamwidths. The required phase shifts are provided by simple fixed phase shifting networks like the butler matrix. They do not require complex algorithms; simple algorithms are used for beam selection. It requires only moderate interaction between mobile unit and base station as compared to adaptive array system. Since low technology is used it has lesser cost and complexity. Integration into existing cellular system is easy and cheap. It provides significant increase in coverage and capacity compared conventional antenna based systems. Since multiple narrow beams are used, frequent intra-cell hand-offs between beams have to be handled as mobile moves from one beam to another. It cannot distinguish between direct signal and interfering and/or multipath signals, this leading to undesired enhancement of the interfering signal more than the desired signal. Since there is no null steering involved; Switched beam systems offers limited cochannel interference suppression as compared to the adaptive array system. Adaptive array system A complete adaptive system; steers the beam towards desired signal-of-interest and

places nulls at the interfering signal directions. It requires implementation of DSP technology. It requires complicated adaptive algorithms to steer the beam and the nulls. It has better interference rejection capability compared to Switched beam systems. It is not easy to implement in existing systems, i.e. upgradation is difficult and expensive. Since continuous steering of the beam is required as the mobile moves; high interaction between mobile unit and base station is required. Since the beam continuously follows the user; intra-cell hand-offs are less. 38 It provides better coverage and increased capacity because of improved interference rejection as compared to the Switched beam system. It can either reject multipath components or add them by correcting the delays to enhance the signal quality. 4.5 Benefits of Smart Antenna Technology 4.5.1 Reduction in co-channel interference Smart antennas has a property of spatial filtering to focus radiated energy in the form of narrow beams only in the direction of the desired mobile user and no other direction. In addition they also have nulls in their radiation pattern in the direction of other mobile users in the vicinity. Therefore there is often negligible co-channel interference. 4.5.2 Range improvement Since smart antennas employs collection of individual elements in the form of an array

they give rise to narrow beam with increased gain when compared to conventional antennas using the same power. The increase in gain leads to increase in range and the coverage of the system. Therefore fewer base stations are required to cover a given area. 4.5.3 Increase in capacity Smart antennas enable reduction in co-channel interference, which leads to increase in the frequency reuse factor. That is smart antennas allow more users to use the same frequency spectrum at the same time bringing about tremendous increase in capacity. 4.5.4 Reduction in transmitted power Ordinary antennas radiate energy in all directions leading to a waste of power. Comparatively smart antennas radiate energy only in the desired direction. Therefore less power is required for radiation at the base station. Reduction in transmitted power also implies reduction in interference towards other users. 3940 4.5.5 Reduction in handoff To improve the capacity in a crowded cellular network, congested cells are further broken into micro cells to enable increase in the frequency reuse factor. This results in frequent handoffs, as the cell size is smaller. Using smart antennas at the base station, there is no need to split the cells since the capacity is increased by using independent spot beams. Therefore, handoffs occur rarely, only when two beams using the same frequency cross each other. 4.5.6 Mitigation of multipath effects

Smart antennas can either reject multipath components as interference, thus mitigating its effects in terms of fading or it can use the multipath components and add them constructively to enhance system performance. 4.5.7 Compatibility Smart antenna technology can be applied to various multiple access techniques such as TDMA, FDMA, and CDMA. It is compatible with almost any modulation method and bandwidth or frequency band.