Status of Free-Space Optical Communications Program at JPL

Similar documents
PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE. Inter-satellite omnidirectional optical communicator for remote sensing

Don M Boroson MIT Lincoln Laboratory. 28 August MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Design of a Free Space Optical Communication Module for Small Satellites

Low Cost Earth Sensor based on Oxygen Airglow

LLCD Accomplishments No Issues with Atmospheric Effects like Fading and Turbulence. Transmitting Data at 77 Mbps < 5 above the horizon

Status of Free Space Optical Communications Technology at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Deep- Space Optical Communication Link Requirements

Wireless Power Transmission of Solar Energy from Space to Earth Using Microwaves

MLCD: Overview of NASA s Mars Laser Communications Demonstration System

Introduction. Laser Diodes. Chapter 12 Laser Communications

Aircraft Lasercom Terminal Compact Optical Module (ALT-COM)

AIM payload OPTEL-D. Multi-purpose laser communication system. Presentation to: AIM Industry Days ESTEC, 22nd February 2016

Spatially Resolved Backscatter Ceilometer

NASA s X2000 Program - an Institutional Approach to Enabling Smaller Spacecraft

Accelerometer-Assisted Tracking and Pointing for Deep Space Optical Communications: Concept, Analysis, and Implementations

Nanosatellite Lasercom System. Rachel Morgan Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue

Optical Communications Group (332-D): Deep-space Optical Terminal (DOT) and Active Isolation Steering Element (AISE) design

Two- Stage Control for CubeSat Optical Communications

Compact High Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (CHRIS) siraelectro-optics

Deep Space Optical Communications

W-Band Satellite Transmission in the WAVE Mission

Status of MOLI development MOLI (Multi-footprint Observation Lidar and Imager)

The Lunar Laser Communications Demonstration (LLCD)

Satellite Testing. Prepared by. A.Kaviyarasu Assistant Professor Department of Aerospace Engineering Madras Institute Of Technology Chromepet, Chennai

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology

A CubeSat-Based Optical Communication Network for Low Earth Orbit

THE OPS-SAT NANOSATELLITE MISSION

12-Pixel WSi SNSPD Arrays for the Lunar Lasercomm OCTL Terminal

DLR s Optical Communications Program for 2018 and beyond. Dr. Sandro Scalise Institute of Communications and Navigation

5 Optical Communication Technologies

Congress Best Paper Award

taccor Optional features Overview Turn-key GHz femtosecond laser

Laser Communications Relay Demonstrations

LE/ESSE Payload Design

FLIGHT SUMMARY REPORT

Lecture 08. Fundamentals of Lidar Remote Sensing (6)

Deep Space Communication The further you go, the harder it gets. D. Kanipe, Sept. 2013

Figure 1. Proposed Mission Operations Functions. Key Performance Parameters Success criteria of an amateur communicator on board of Moon-exploration

Application of an optical data link on DLR s BIROS satellite

Autonomous and Autonomic Systems: With Applications to NASA Intelligent Spacecraft Operations and Exploration Systems

Interplanetary CubeSats mission for space weather evaluations and technology demonstration

Small Sat Lasercom. Renny Fields. The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA July 11, 2016

RECONNAISSANCE PAYLOADS FOR RESPONSIVE SPACE

Key Issues in Modulating Retroreflector Technology

CubeSat Integration into the Space Situational Awareness Architecture

Wind Imaging Spectrometer and Humidity-sounder (WISH): a Practical NPOESS P3I High-spatial Resolution Sensor

Developing An Optical Ground Station For The CHOMPTT CubeSat Mission. Tyler Ritz

LTE. Tester of laser range finders. Integrator Target slider. Transmitter channel. Receiver channel. Target slider Attenuator 2

Payload Configuration, Integration and Testing of the Deformable Mirror Demonstration Mission (DeMi) CubeSat

HEMERA Constellation of passive SAR-based micro-satellites for a Master/Slave configuration

The Asteroid Finder Focal Plane

TopSat: Brief to Ground Segment Coordination. Presenter Ian Pilling. By : W.A. Levett. Co author: E.J. Baxter.

OPTEL-µ : Flight Design and Status of EQM Development

An Adaptive Threshold Detector and Channel Parameter Estimator for Deep Space Optical Communications

Starshade Technology Development Status

Lecturer Series ASTRONOMY. FH Astros. Telecommunication with Space Craft. Kurt Niel (University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria)

High Speed, Low Cost Telemetry Access from Space Development Update on Programmable Ultra Lightweight System Adaptable Radio (PULSAR)

Satellite Technology for Future Applications

NOAA EON-IR CubeSat Study for Operational Infrared Soundings

Lecture 08. Fundamentals of Lidar Remote Sensing (6)

Interferometric Cartwheel 1

AMIPAS. Advanced Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmosphere Sounding. Concepts and Technology for Future Atmospheric Chemistry Sensors

AIAA/USU Small Satellite Conference 2007 Paper No. SSC07-VIII-2

NIRCam optical calibration sources

Incorporating a Test Flight into the Standard Development Cycle

The Nemo Bus: A Third Generation Nanosatellite Bus for Earth Monitoring and Observation

Adaptive Optics for LIGO

Japanese concept of microwave-type SSPS

Future Plans for the Deep Space Network (DSN)

THE NASA/JPL AIRBORNE SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR SYSTEM. Yunling Lou, Yunjin Kim, and Jakob van Zyl

Space Situational Awareness 2015: GPS Applications in Space

AN INTRODUCTION TO MICROCARB, FIRST EUROPEAN PROGRAM FOR CO2 MONITORING.

Polarimetric Imaging Laser Radar (PILAR) Program

EARLY DEVELOPMENT IN SYNTHETIC APERTURE LIDAR SENSING FOR ON-DEMAND HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING

Overview and Status of the Lunar Laser Communications Demonstration

Autonomous Cooperative Robots for Space Structure Assembly and Maintenance

Korea s First Satellite for Satellite Laser Ranging

By Pierre Olivier, Vice President, Engineering and Manufacturing, LeddarTech Inc.

(SDR) Based Communication Downlinks for CubeSats

Space Technology Mission Directorate. NASA's Role in Small Spacecraft Technologies: Today and in the Future

Chapter 2 Link and System Design

Ground Station Design for STSAT-3

SSC99-VI th AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites. Dr. Stephen Horan

Laser Telemetric System (Metrology)

Satellite Sub-systems

Optical Communication Experiment Using Very Small Optical TrAnsponder Component on a Small Satellite RISESAT

FORMATION FLYING PICOSAT SWARMS FOR FORMING EXTREMELY LARGE APERTURES

PoS(PhotoDet 2012)051

SATELLITE SUBSYSTEMS. Networks and Communication Department. Dr. Marwah Ahmed

Detectors that cover a dynamic range of more than 1 million in several dimensions

Japanese Advanced Meteorological Imager: A Next Generation GEO Imager for MTSAT-1R

Compact Dual Field-of-View Telescope for Small Satellite Payloads

Industry Day of the Copernicus Sentinel-5 and Jason-CS Projects

SPACOMM 2009 PANEL. Challenges and Hopes in Space Navigation and Communication: From Nano- to Macro-satellites

Ultralight Weight Optical Systems using Nano-Layered Synthesized Materials

APGEN: A Multi-Mission Semi-Automated Planning Tool

Solar Optical Telescope (SOT)

University of Kentucky Space Systems Laboratory. Jason Rexroat Space Systems Laboratory University of Kentucky

A LATERAL SENSOR FOR THE ALIGNMENT OF TWO FORMATION-FLYING SATELLITES

Transcription:

Status of Free-Space Optical Communications Program at JPL H. Hemmati Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91 109, M/S 161-135 Phone #: 8 18-354-4960 hamid.hemmati@jpl.nasa.gov Abstract - Optical communications is a rapidly developing technology applicable to future NASA and commercial space missions that desire communications a terminal that provides a higher data rate with lower mass and power. An experimental transmitter that will downlink data at the rate of2.5gbps fi-om the International Space Station is being constructednow.under its X2000program,JPLplans to develop a deep space optical communications transceiver fa micro-spacecrafts that would, in an early demonstration, support 10 s of Kbps data-rate fi-om the Mars range. NASA is currently building a 1-m R&D telescope laboratory at its Table Mountain Facility in southern California to answer key implementation questions of this technology. The telescope is designed with fast tracking capability and will act as a testbed for development of ground acquisition, tracking and communications strategies applicable to future operational stations. These and other programs currently under development are described below. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. APPROACH 3. CONCLUSION 4. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5. REFERENCES 6. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. INTRODUCTION Future missions will fly smaller spacecraft with instruments that will generate greater data volumes than current spacecraft. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR), multispectral imagers and high-rate sensors are driving this requirement. Conventional deep-space RF communication systems (particularly X-band) will have difficulty satisfying these needs due to limited bandwidth allocations, oversubscription of the ground receiver network, and technology limitations. At the same time, the trend towards smaller spacecrafi will dictate that the communication system relaying those data be much smaller in size. Free-space optical communications is an emerging technology under development for addressing the increased communication capacity reduced and size requirements. Optical Communications is seen as the technology that will meet these needs for future near-earth, solar system and interstellar missions. Free-space laser-communications has the promise of delivering as much as 10 times higher data-rate with 10 times reduced size and lower mass, relative to the conventional spacecraft communication technology (assuming the same input DC power). The technical merit of laser communications is derived from the fact that it offers much a higher collimated signal than conventional microwave. This super-collimated beam, can result in a terminal design with greatly reduced size, mass, and power requirements. Furthermore, laser communication systems are not susceptible to radio-fi-equency interference and are not subject to bandwidth regulation. Additionally, the higher data return rates afforded by optical communications reduce the required ground coverage time that is needed to recover the science data. This results in reduced a ground operations cost. An optical diagram of a typical deep-space transceiver is shown in Figure 1. It consist 10 of a to 30 cm transmitfreceive aperture, a diode-pumped solid-state laser transmitter with 1 to 5 W average output power for downlink, 1 to 2 focal-plane arrays (such as Active Pixel Sensors) for acquisition and tracking, single-element a photodiode for uplink command and ranging reception, and a fine-pointing mirror to remove the spacecraft platform jitter. The top-level requirements for a transceiver are: typical deep space Downlink capability of several 100 s of Kbits/s (Kbps) and uplink reception capability of at least 2 Kbps Acquisition, tracking and reception uplink of command while transmitting a strong downlink signal through the same aperture Proper pointing of the highly collimated laser beam to earth while the host spacecraft is oscillating, jittering, contracting and expanding. Maintaining pointing of the transmit signal during daytime reception with an absolute accuracy on the order of micro-radians. Acquisition and tracking of the ground receiver locations, from deep space, for a wide range of Sun- Earth-Probe (SEP) angles. Simultaneous two-way ranging and communication support. Adequate level of built-in reliability to survive the targeted mission period and to remain optomechanically and thermo-mechanically stable during launch, cruise and intense operation phases of the mission.

Transmit Channel Celestial Reference1 Imaging Channel (500-1 100 ~ n ) Data Channel Transmit Reference Channel (1064 nm) Figure 1 Conceptual Optical Diagram for the Transceiver 1. APPROACH Both component and subsystem technology development efforts are now underway to enable future operational optical communications from deep space and to more fully realize the potential of this technology. A brief description of some of these efforts is summarized below. High Efficiency Component and Subsystem Technology Development: The aim of these tasks is to substantially improve the efficiency and performance of components and subsystems for laser-communication terminals. Mass and the required DC power for the flight instrument are both very expensive commodities, particularly deep-space in missions. Efficiency high-data-rate of (Gbps level) transmitters and low data-rate (Kbps level) diode-pumped solid-state lasers are being improved. Modulated diode lasers or amplified diode lasers with moderate average power are adequate for communications fi-om the earth orbit to ground. Implementation of the pulse-positionmodulation (PPM) scheme in deep-space laser transmitters will reduce the requiredaveragepower but requires high peak powers. Thus, Q-switched solid-state lasers are necessary for deep-space communications. Recent analysis indicates that an overall efficiency of 25% for diode-pumped pulsed lasers transmitters is possible (compared with current value of about 7%). When the optical communications telescope looks back at earth for acquisition and tracking and downlink, the Sun is generally in the background and at times partially within its field-of-view. This causes a number of challenges (such as signal-to-noise deterioration and heating of the telescope) that have to be addressed effectively. For this purpose, low mass, very low thermal expansion optical systems with very effective background filtering are being investigated. Acquisition, Tracking and Pointing (ATP) Algorithms and Testbed: ATP is a critical element of optical communication whose implementation strategy is determined primarily by range. Acquisition and tracking for fine beam pointing is the most challenging aspeet of fi-ee-space lasercommunications. ATP is an area that requires technology development while it could be claimed that all other component technologies for a laser-communication terminal are mature enough for operation in space. A typical RF communication system relies on the spacecraft acquiring the Earth and maintaining a pointing knowledge of about 0.1" (- 2 mrad). This is an adequate level of pointing due to the relatively wide beam-width of the RF

systems. In comparison, the laser beam has to be pointed to better than 1 pad levels. The narrower transmit beamwidth poses a major technical challenge for optical communicationwhich is the acquisition, tracking and pointing process. The lasercomm transceiver must be capable of tracking the receiving station to maintain a residual pointing error that is small (about 1/10) compared with the transmit beamwidth. Laboratory demonstrations and a successful lasercomm demonstration from GEO to ground indicate that solutions for these challenges are at hand, although significant additional work remains [l]. To point the narrowbeam-divergence laser beam to Earth, the flight terminal requires a beacon signal from the receiver location. The beacon signal could be either a laser emanating from the Earth (a point source), Sun-illuminated Earth itself (an extended source) or precision star tracking. When the distance from the Earth to the spacecraft is less than 1 AU (1 AU is the mean distance from the Sun to the Earth), an uplink laser beacon signal will be received and tracked. However, as the spacecraft moves beyond 1 AU distance, the system will revert to tracking the solar-illuminated Earth image. In this case outage periods may occur, for example when the Earth is in fiont of the Sun. Finally, the optical communications system must have the ability to track out base platform motions from the spacecraft in order to keep the downlink beam on the Earth receiver. The tracking loop sensor must have an update rate that is high enough to allow the loop to compensate for the highest hquency jitter components. The current baseline for the update rate is 2 khz. Currently, concepts that address links up to 0.5 AU have been demonstrated using FPA centroiding accuracy of only 1/10" of a pixel, leaving only microradians of pointing error [2]. Extended link ranges will require up to five time more centroiding accuracy. The objective of the on-going research effort is to reduce pointing error to the sub-micro-radian level by developing and demonstrating in a simulated space environment, algorithms capable of acping high-bandwidth, highaccuracy centroiding (1/50 of a pixel). We expect to achieve such an improvement using state-of-the-art Focal- Plane-Arrays (FPAs) together with innovative ATP concepts which combine extended-source-tracking, sensor feedback, and isolators. To experimentally evaluate these algorithms, an acquisition and tracking testbed was developed where spacecraft vibration, both point source and extended-source beacon, and background light can be simulated. Compact, low power consumption (< 0.1 W), large area (1024 x 1024 pixels), high update-rate acquisition and tracking FPAs including active-pixelsensors and new generations of CCDs are being developed and are characterized in the testbed. High bandwidth, lowmass fine-pointing mirrors (both mechanical and nonmechanical) is also being evaluated in the acquisition and tracking testbed. Transmitter and Receiver Testbed (forflight and ground): A testbed for extensive characterization of a variety of laser transmitters and receivers is under development at JPL. This testbed will serve the needs of various on-going programs and could serve programs external to JPL in the near future. A goal of this testbed is to identify highest quantum-efficiency and lowest noise avalanche photodiodes for both ground and in space reception of the lasercomm signals. A goal of this program is identification of detectors and amplifiers for (direct) detection of communication signals down to the level of a few photons per bit. Optical Communication Demonstrator (OCD): OCD is a laboratory-based lasercomm demonstration terminal designed to validate several key technologies, including beacon acquisition, high bandwidth tracking, precision beam-pointing and point-ahead compensation functions [3-41. The instrument has a 10-cm diameter aperture, uses a CCD array for both spatial acquisition and high bandwidth tracking, and a fiber-coupled laser transmitter. Figure 2 shows a picture of the 10-cm aperture OCD hardware where the box containing the Figure 2 Picture of the OCD assembly (electronics are not shown) Near-Earth Laser-Communication Transmitter: The International Space Station (ISS) Engineering Research and Technology Development program (ISSERT) is sponsoring the development of a high data rate (up to 2.5 Gbps) lasercomm transmitter from the LEO range (on board the ISS) [5]. The terminal design is based on the OCD instrument. The transmit aperture fa the flight terminal and the ground receiver aperture are 10 cm and 100 cm, respectively. It utilizes an eye-safe transmitter wavelength of 1550 nm (compared with 844 nm for OCD). Deep-Space Laser-Communication Transceiver: A new program called the ATTI (Advanced Technology Transfer and Infusion, AKA X2000), has been initiated to develop new cutting-edge technologies for NASA's deepspace missions in an overall flight project environment [6]. The ATTI system is a (50-kg class) micro-spacecrafl with highly limited mass and power allocation for the subsystems. The transceiver under investigation for this

technology development spacecraft is a multi-functional instrument with capability for narrow-angle (highresolution) science imaging, optical navigation and ranging in addition to communication. The current baseline is 10 s of Kbps data-rate from a range of 2 AU. A mechanical model of such a design is shown in Figure 3. An optics benchfollows the telescopewhere the beamsizing optics, the focal plane arrays, the fine-pointing mirror and the laser s optical head are located. The laser head is thermally isolated from this plane. The drive electronics and controller and processors for the final segment of this assembly. Figure 4 Picture of the ground companion terminal, constructed to evaluate terminals intended for flight Ground Receivers and Ground Reception Technologies: Figure 3 Mechanicalconcept model for the deepspace Optical Communications transceiver Laser-Communication Test and Evaluation Station her- Communication Test and Evaluation Station (LTES): LTES is a high quality optical system that measures the key characteristics of lasercomm terminals operating over the visible and near-wed spectral region [7]. LTES can accommodate terminal apertures up to 20-cm in diameter. LTES has six optical channels and can measure far-field beam pattern, divergence, data-rates up to 1.4 Gbps and bit-error rates as low as 1E-9. It also measures the output power of the laser-terminal s beacon and communication channels, and the point-ahead angle with a resolution of 1 pad. A picture of the LTES setup is shown in Figure 4. Current NASA plans call for building the first of three 10- m-class ground receiving telescopes by year 2008. NASA is currently building a 1-m R&D telescope laboratory at its Table Mountain Facility in Wrightwood, CA, to answer key implementation questions of this technology [SI. The telescope is designed with fast tracking capability to allow JPL engineers to use comer-cube reflector, and laser bearing satellites as testbed for developing acquisition tracking and communications strategies applicable to future operational stations. The expected date forreadinessof this telescope is May of 2001. Improved receivers for ground reception, definition of requirements and cost-estimates for larger aperture (1. 10 m) photon-buckets, schemes for implementing near-earth acquisition and communication with the spacecraft,and recoveryfiomspacecraftemergencyscenariosareamong the ground reception technologies that are being investigated. 3. CONCLUSION Technology advances enabled reliable have communications fiom Earth orbit to ground receivers. Components and systems required to communicate hm deep space have matured to the level that demonstrations are feasible. Reliable operation would require further technology development of the efficiency of components and more robust acquisition, tracking and pointing algorithms. 4. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The research described in this report was carried out by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The author would like to

express his appreciation to the Optical Communications Group at JPL and associated team members for their contributions to the systems described above. 5. REFERENCES [l] K. Wilson et. Al., Overview of the Ground to Orbit Lasercomm Demonstration (GOLD), SPIE V. 2990, 23-30 (1997). [2] M. Jeganathan et al., Lessons Learnt from the Optical Communications Demonstrator, SPLE V. 3615, 23-30 (1999). [3] US. Patent # 5,517,016 Lasercomm System Architecture with Reduced Complexity, May 1996. [4] C. Chen and J. Lesh, Overview of the Optical Communications Demonstrator, Proceedings of SPIE OE-LASE 94, paper 2123-09 (1994). [5] J.V. Sandusky et al, Overview of the Preliminary Design of the Optical Communication Demonstration and High-Rate Link facility SPIE V. 3615, 185-191 (1999). [6] H. Hemmati & N. Page Preliminary Optomechanical Design for the X-2000 Transceiver SPIE V. 3615, 206-211 (1999). [7]. K. Wilson, et. al., The Lasercomm Test and Evaluation Station for Flight Terminal Evaluation, SPIE Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2990 (1997). [SI. K. Wilson et. al., Progress in Design and Construction of the Optical Communications Laser Laboratory, SPIE, V. 3615, 201-205 (1999) 6. BIOGRAPHY H. Hemmati is the Supervisor of the Optical Communications Group at JPL. He received a Ph.D. in Physics from Colorado State University in 1981 and a Masters degree in Physics from the University of Southern California in 1977. His graduate work was on lasers and laser spectroscopy. From 1981-83 he worked on laser cooling of trapped ions athe National Institute of Standards and Technology as a Post-doctoral associate. From 1983-86 he worked at the NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center conducting research on an instrument for the COBE spacecraft, and also on optical communications technology. In 1996 he joined the Optical Communications Group at JPL. His research interests include: efficient laser transmitters for deep space, flight terminal breadboard development, system engineering, and development of the components and system technologies to enable deployment of optical communication systems in space.