Monitoring Developments for safe Repository operation and staged closure MoDeRn

Similar documents
Development of the Strategic Research Agenda of the Implementing Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste Technology Platform

European Initiative: Implementing Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste Technology Platform IGD-TP

Application and adaptation of mature geological disposal concepts to less advanced programmes

TOWARDS AN "IMPLEMENTING GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM" IN EUROPE

WG1 - Industrialisation and optimisation

INTERNATIONAL SOCIO- TECHNICAL CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTING GD PROJECT OVERVIEW

WG1 - Industrialisation and optimisation

IGD-TP 6 th Exchange Forum

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 18 May /06 Interinstitutional File: 2005/0044 (CNS) RECH 130 ATO 48 COMPET 129

Supporting European expertise in nuclear decommissioning roundtable

II. The mandates, activities and outputs of the Technology Executive Committee

Status of Geologic Repository Projects in Germany. Thilo v. Berlepsch WMS 2016, Phoenix March 8 th, 2016

nuclear science and technology

Advanced Impacts evaluation Methodology for innovative freight transport Solutions

European Research Infrastructures Framework Programme 7

Common Features and National Differences - preliminary findings -

IGD-TP's Eighth Exchange Forum

ASAMPSA2 WORKSHOP PRELIMINAR AGENDA

Christina Miller Director, UK Research Office

European Technology Platforms

European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Joint Action 3

Sustainable Network of Independent Technical Expertise for Radioactive Waste Disposal (SITEX)

Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management

Introducing the 7 th Community Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development ( ) 2013)

Rethinking the role of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in Horizon 2020: toward a reflective and generative perspective

HORIZON Presentation at Manufuture Perspectives on Industrial Technologies in Horizon 2020 and Beyond

The main FP7 instruments. Aurélien Saffroy. 6 Dec

THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER PARTICULARS OF APPOINTMENT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY DALTON RESEARCH ASSOCIATE

Marie Curie Actions FP7 and Horizon 2020

EGS-CC. System Engineering Team. Commonality of Ground Systems. Executive Summary

Implementation of Safe Geological Disposal in Japan

IGD-TP Newsletter Issue #5, July 2016

TECHNOLOGY WITH A HUMAN TOUCH

Enhancing and focusing EU international cooperation in research and innovation: A strategic approach. Policy Research and Innovation

2. At its meeting on 3 November 2008, the Working Party reached agreement on the attached draft conclusions.

European-South African Cooperation in Scientific and Technical Research

Strengthening the knowledge base and reducing fragmentation

Communication and Dissemination in HORIZON 2020 European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation

Final Report. MAASiFiE. Report Nr 1.2 May 2017

The ETV pilot programme: State of play, standardisation issues

Brainstorming on IPR, use and dissemination issues in the FP7 Future Internet Public Private Partnership. Workshop Report Brussels, 8 July 2010

Presentation of the results. Niels Gøtke, Chair of the expert group and Effie Amanatidou, Rapporteur

I. Introduction. Cover note. A. Mandate. B. Scope of the note. Technology Executive Committee. Fifteenth meeting. Bonn, Germany, September 2017

SAFETY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES AND THEIR APPLICATION IN DEVELOPMENT OF NEAR SURFACE WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES ASAM PROJECT

The Role of the EU Regions in Supporting Robotics

Terms of Reference. Call for Experts in the field of Foresight and ICT

Education and Training in Nuclear Decommissioning

WM2015 Conference, March 15 19, 2015, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Co-operative Programme on Decommissioning Projects CPD. Jean-Guy Nokhamzon CEA/DEN/DPA

DoReMi-MELODI Training and Education Forum Introduction and background

Presentation of the SME Performance Review 2015/2016

Framework Programme 7 and SMEs. Amaury NEVE European Commission DG Research - Unit T4: SMEs

April 2015 newsletter. Efficient Energy Planning #3

Score grid for SBO projects with an economic finality version January 2019

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

Dissemination, Exploitation & Communication

GENEVA COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (CDIP) Fifth Session Geneva, April 26 to 30, 2010

FP7 Cooperation Programme - Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Tentative Work Programme 2011

Principle Administrator: Claudio PESCATORE

Arbeitsbericht NAB 16-20

Office for Nuclear Regulation

Roadmap for European Universities in Energy December 2016

Welcome! Vanesa Gil, PhD. R&D Manager at FHA / ARAID* Senior Researcher Fundación Hidrógeno Aragón

Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

Information Sheet. A. Background. IAEA Headquarters Vienna, Austria. 3 7 September Ref. No: EVT

Building the ERA of Knowledge for Growth. Proposals for the 7 th Research Framework Programme

Score grid for SBO projects with a societal finality version January 2018

IGD-TP's Eighth Exchange Forum

Radiological Protection: Old Questions Needing New Answers

HORIZON Leadership in Enabling and Industrial Technologies (LEIT)

Belgian Position Paper

Whole of Society Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the

Engaging Stakeholders

DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY PRINCIPLES FOR IN- VEHICLE INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

Robotics: from FP7 to Horizon Libor Král, Head of Unit Unit A2 - Robotics DG Communication Networks, Content and Technology European Commission

eafip Workshop fo Public Procurers in th Security Secto 9 th June 2016 in Riga Latvi Astrid De Nev Flanders Innovation and Entrepreneursh

Christophe DESSAUX Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication Association MICHAEL Culture

Communicating Framework Programme 7. European Commission Research DG Pablo AMOR

Ambrosini, W.; Cizelj, L.; Dieguez Porras, P.; Jaspers, R.J.E.; Noterdaeme, J.; Scheffer, M.; Schoenfelder, C.

Brief presentation of the results Ioana ISPAS ERA NET COFUND Expert Group

Spatial Deployment of Offshore Wind Energy in Europe

Centralised Impact Assessment of EU Co-Funded Projects. Angus Hunter Annual Joint Programming Conference November 2016 (Session 2)

Item 4.2 of the Draft Provisional Agenda COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

1. Introduction. defining and producing new materials with advanced properties, or optimizing industrial processes.

An introduction to the 7 th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development. Gorgias Garofalakis

FP7 PEOPLE PROGRAMME. Update FP7. Programme Committee Meeting 12 March 2015

Introduction to the OPERRA Project. Jean-René Jourdain (IRSN, France) OPERRA Project Coordinator

4th BioHorizon International Brokerage Event 26 th of June Fare clic per modificare lo stile del titolo

Science For Clean Energy

Fact Sheet IP specificities in research for the benefit of SMEs

Towards new Icing Protection in Aviation

POLICY SIMULATION AND E-GOVERNANCE

FINAL PUBLISHABLE REPORT

Open Science policy and infrastructure support in the European Commission. Joint COAR-SPARC Conference. Porto, 15 April 2015

Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions

EU Project MORE. Reduction of the environmental footprint of industrial processes by resource-aware operation

1 st EU Dialogue on Ecodesign and New Business Models for a Circular Economy. Introduction to the COBALT project

New societal challenges for the European Union New challenges for social sciences and the humanities

COST Open Call and COST New Action Proposal Submission, Evaluation, Selection and Approval Procedure

Transcription:

PROJECT PRESENTATION (PP) Monitoring Developments for safe Repository operation and staged closure MoDeRn Contract (grant agreement) number: 232598 Author(s): Andra Date of issue of this report: 27/01/2010

Nature, scope and potential impact of the MoDeRn project Spent nuclear fuel and long-lived radioactive waste must be contained and isolated for very long periods, and current schemes for its long-term management involve disposal in deep geologic repositories. The successful implementation of a repository programme for radioactive waste relies on both the technical aspects of a sound safety strategy and scientific and engineering excellence as well as on societal aspects such as stakeholder acceptance and confidence. Monitoring is considered key in serving both ends. It underpins the technical safety strategy and quality of the engineering, and can be an important tool for public communication, contributing to public understanding of and confidence in repository behaviour. The main goal of MoDeRn (Monitoring Developments for safe Repository operation and staged closure), a four year Collaborative Project funded under the 7th Framework Program for Nuclear Research and Training (EURATOM) is to establish a roadmap for developing and implementing various monitoring activities for deep geological repositories. This 'reference framework' will draw on experiences and lessons learned from waste-management programmes in different countries and will integrate new information from various stakeholder-engagement activities. It will cover all stages of the disposal process, and will suggest ways of integrating monitoring results in the decision-making process. To achieve this, MoDeRn is reviewing broadly accepted monitoring objectives and elaborating them to better reflect the actual implementation of disposal monitoring activities. The project also aims to verify whether these objectives are likely to address both expert and non-expert stakeholder expectations. To this end, MoDeRn project partners seek to better understand repository monitoring activities and technologies and to provide recommendations for stakeholder-engagement activities. As a core part of its proposed activities, MoDeRn will provide a clear description of monitoring objectives and strategies, taking into account a variety of physical and societal contexts, available monitoring technology, and feedback from both expert and non-expert stakeholder interactions. In relation to this, the project has defined the technical requirements of monitoring activities and has begun to assess the latest relevant technology. A technical workshop involving other monitoring Research and Technology Development (RTD) projects was hosted to identify RTD techniques that enhance our ability to monitor deep geological repositories. In particular, innovative monitoring approaches specific to repository design requirements are being tested within underground research laboratories. In addition, a case study was initiated to illustrate the process of mapping objectives and strategies onto the processes and parameters that need to be monitored in a given context, with a further aim to illustrate the potential design of corresponding monitoring systems and possible approaches to prevent and detect measurement errors. The case study will also show how unexpected repository evolutions may be handled. Interaction with stakeholders is at the heart of the MoDeRn project. Workshops and conferences will provide opportunities to report and discuss results with the research community, experts (e.g. from technical safety organisations) and non-experts (e.g. from civil society) and to collect feedback. A website (www.modern-fp7.eu) will provide updated information about progress (e.g. via project Deliverables) and events (e.g. workshops) as well as access to relevant publications. 2

Collectively, these activities will form the basis for a 'roadmap for repository monitoring' and may have a significant societal impact. The project also aims to propose an approach to enhancing confidence in the disposal process by describing feasible monitoring activities, highlighting remaining technological obstacles, illustrating the possible uses of monitoring results and suggesting ways to involve stakeholders in the process of identifying monitoring objectives The resulting roadmap will then enable radioactive waste management organisations in Europe and beyond to further progress towards implementing deep geological repositories that are safe and acceptable for all. MoDeRn project partners (in Table 1 below) committed to providing these expected results represent organisations responsible for radioactive waste management in the EU, Switzerland, the US and Japan as well as organisations having relevant monitoring expertise. Other partners offer substantial experience in researching how people interact with technology and finding ways to engage all stakeholders (e.g. civil society, experts, technical safety organisations, industry) in highly technical issues. Table 1.1: List of MoDeRn Project Partners Partner number Partner full name Short name Country code (2-letter ISO code) 1 Agence nationale pour la gestion des déchets radioactifs Andra FR 2 Asociación para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Industrial de los Recursos Naturales Aitemin ES 3 DBE Technology GmbH DBE TEC DE 4 Empresa Nacional de Residuos Radioactivos S.A. Enresa ES 5 European Underground Research Infrastructure for Disposal of Nuclear Waste in Clay Environments Euridice BE 6 Nationale Genossenschaft für die Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle Nagra CH 7 Nuclear Decommissioning Authority NDA UK 8 Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group v.o.f. NRG NL 9 Posiva Oy Posiva FI 10 Radioactive Waste Repository Authority RAWRA CZ 11 Radioactive Waste Management Funding and Research Center RWMC JP 12 Sandia National Laboratories Sandia US 13 Universiteit Antwerpen UA BE 14 University of East Anglia UEA UK 15 University of Gothenburg UGOT SE 16 Galson Sciences ltd. GSL UK 17 Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich ETH Zurich CH 18 Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB SKB SE Current status on work performed and main results obtained during the first period The project objectives are achieved through a comprehensive and coherent program of research structured along five interrelated RTD and demonstration work packages. 3

The first work package aims to provide guidance to advance the development of monitoring high-level principles forward to a level of detail for monitoring objectives and strategies that appear viable and can be readily linked to monitoring implementation in the different national programmes across all phases of the repository development. Work has progressed, first (Task 1.1) by providing an overview of the various national contexts that would condition choices on repository monitoring and by summarizing key commonalities and differences, as well as the status of existing developments production of a National context summary report with country annexes. In parallel to this, (Task 1.2) first developments of monitoring objectives and a first attempt to structure the approach of developing a monitoring programme were provided production of a first version Objectives and Strategies report with country annexes. National stakeholder engagement experiments (Task 1.4) were prepared by providing a thorough analysis of the understanding and aims of the scientific and technical community on what monitoring may and should contribute to geological disposal (Task 1.3) partial production of an Understanding the Experts report. The second work package aims to provide a realistic assessment of the specific technical requirements for needed monitoring equipment, an overview of the state-of-the-art in monitoring approaches and technologies available and potentially useful for repository monitoring, highlighting those remaining technological shortcomings that may still represent an obstacle in meeting monitoring objectives as described under WP1, and improving on what is currently available by conducting several focused RTDs. Work has progressed (Task 2.1) by providing a first description of technical requirements which will likely need to be addressed when developing, selecting and implementing monitoring technologies suitable to be used for the geologic disposal of radioactive waste production of a Technical requirements report (Deliverable 2.1.1). It then proceeded (Task 2.2) by organizing and reporting on a workshop on monitoring technologies hosting the monitoring RTD workshop and production of the corresponding workshop report (Deliverable 2.2.1) and by presenting an initial overview of available project knowledge in monitoring technologies state-of-the-art in the production of a first draft State-of-the-art monitoring technologies report. In parallel, (Task 2.3) several focused monitoring technology RTDs aimed at enhancing the available toolbox for repository monitoring were initiated and a draft intermediate progress report was prepared on: Wireless network techniques and adequate power sources, Wireless through-rock transmission, Geophysical monitoring techniques, Fibre optic sensors. The third work package aims to develop in-situ demonstration of innovative monitoring techniques and provide a description of innovative monitoring approaches specifically responding to some of the design requirements of a repository. Work has progressed (Task 3.1) by developing plans for the proposed demonstration programmes production of a Demonstrator monitoring programmes report (Deliverable 3.1.1) and through initial installation and begin of the four corresponding monitoring experiments (Tasks 3.2 3.5): Testing and Evaluation of Monitoring Systems (TEM) to be undertaken at the Grimsel Test Site (GTS) Underground Rock Laboratory (URL) in Switzerland, Application of wireless data transmission monitoring technology in the GTS URL, Monitoring of the PRACLAY large-scale heating experiment in the HADES URL in Belgium, using micro seismic and fibre-optic based sensing techniques. In addition, 4

wireless techniques for the transmission of data from HADES to the surface will be tested, Integrated internal monitoring of inside of a disposal cell demonstrator, on its liner and its near-field in the Bure URL in France. The fourth work package, consisting of a case study activity, aims at tackling all relevant monitoring aspects by considering a system design based on different monitoring concepts and adapted to different specific host rocks and engineered barriers. The cases to be studied in this work package should take the main objective and sub-objectives defined in work package 1 as a starting level and then address the sub-objectives to link them to monitoring relevant physical processes to the point of parameters actually be monitored by corresponding measurement systems. Work has progressed (Task 4.1) by defining the cases to be studied as focused on the three most commonly considered host rocks i.e. salt, clay and granite, as well as three different disposal concepts ( the German, French, Finnish concepts), in order to cover the most relevant monitoring issues for final repositories of high-level heat generating radioactive waste. An initial draft developing possible monitoring processes and parameters for all three cases (Task 4.2) was developed as a basis for further discussions. The fifth work package, aims at providing key dissemination activities towards the general public, stakeholders interested in certain technical/scientific aspects of repository monitoring. Work has progressed (Task 5.1) by designing a project website for communication of project internal and general public information production and restricted/public access to the project website; (Task 5.2) by providing an initial project presentation and a communication action plan; (Task5.3) by planning and initial preparation for an expert stakeholder workshop to interact with a broader community expert in repository developments production of a workshop brief; (Task 5.4) by developing first plans for an international repository monitoring conference. A final work package will consolidate results from the previous work packages and provide a shared international view on how monitoring may be conducted at the various phases of the disposal process. This activity will start during the last period of the project. Contact details Coordinator, WP1, WP5, WP6 leader Stefan Mayer Andra, 1-7 rue Jean Monnet 92 298 Châtenay-Malabry cedex France Email : stefan.mayer@andra.fr WP2 Leader José-Luis Garcia Siñeriz AITEMIN Margarita Salas, 14 Parque Leganés Tecnológico 28919 Leganés, Madrid Spain Email : jlg.sineriz@aitemin.es WP3 Leader Brendan Breen NDA Westlakes Science Park, Herdus House CA24 3HU Moor Row UK Email : brendan.breen@nda.gov.uk WP4 Leader Michael Jobmann DBE TEC Eschenstraße 55 D-31224 Peine Germany Email : jobmann@dbe.de EC project officer Christophe Davies European Commission - Directorate-General for Research Directorate Energy (Euratom) Unit J.2 Fission CDMA 1/61 B-1049 Brussels Email: Christophe.davies@ec.europa.eu 5

Project Website : www.modern-fp7.eu Project information Project type (funding instrument): Collaborative project Medium-scale focused research project Project start date: 01/05/2009 Duration: 48 months Total budget: EUR 5 111 484 EC contribution: EUR 2 800 000 Picture of MoDeRn partners, at the First MoDeRn Workshop, 23-24 June 2009, Le Plessis- Robinson (France) 6