Covert Tunnel Detection Technologies

Similar documents
TECHNOLOGY Keeping up with the requirements of Homeland Security & Homeland Defense

Adaptation and Application of Aerospace and Defense Industry Technologies to the Oil and Gas Industry

SmartSenseCom Introduces Next Generation Seismic Sensor Systems

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item #13 Page 1 of 11

Detection of Pipelines using Sub-Audio Magnetics (SAM)

Geophysical Survey Rock Hill Bleachery TBA Site Rock Hill, South Carolina EP-W EPA, START 3, Region 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Signature

Partnering: Labs and Small Businesses

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) By Dr. Eng. Zubair Ahmed

Ground Penetrating Radar

MR-i. Hyperspectral Imaging FT-Spectroradiometers Radiometric Accuracy for Infrared Signature Measurements

MR-i. Hyperspectral Imaging FT-Spectroradiometers Radiometric Accuracy for Infrared Signature Measurements

FLY EYE RADAR MINE DETECTION GROUND PENETRATING RADAR ON TETHERED DRONE PASSIVE RADAR FOR SMALL UAS PASSIVE SMALL PROJECTILE TRACKING RADAR

Module 3 Introduction to GIS. Lecture 8 GIS data acquisition

Accurate Automation Corporation. developing emerging technologies

Advanced Utility Locating Technologies (R01B)

Fiberoptic and Waveguide Sensors

Army Acoustics Needs

Mining Industry Engagement Workshop

Advanced Ground Investigation Techniques to Help Limit Risk or Examine Failure. Advanced Subsurface Investigations

April 10, Develop and demonstrate technologies needed to remotely detect the early stages of a proliferant nation=s nuclear weapons program.

Phase I: Evaluate existing and promising UXO technologies with emphasis on detection and removal of UXO.

SEISMIC, ACOUSTIC, AND MAGNETIC TEST RESULTS FROM US/GERMAN TESTING

Customer Showcase > Defense and Intelligence

Electromagnetic Induction

Australian Defence Science in the 21 st Century

CHC MINING DEFORMATION MONITORING SOLUTION

HELICOPTER-BORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY SYSTEMS

Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD) Capability Assessment Event (CAE)

Lessons Learned in Conducting Acoustic Leak Detection Surveys on Water Distribution Systems at 12 Military Installations

Phantom Dome - Advanced Drone Detection and jamming system

Report. Mearns Consulting LLC. Former Gas Station 237 E. Las Tunas Drive San Gabriel, California Project # E

Dr. Tony Tether Director

Ultra Electronics Integrated Sonar Suite

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

7. Consider the following common offset gather collected with GPR.

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

Traffic Solutions. How to Test FCD Monitoring Solutions: Performance of Cellular-Based Vs. GPS-based systems

MILITARY RADAR TRENDS AND ANALYSIS REPORT

P Forsmark site investigation. RAMAC and BIPS logging in borehole HFM11 and HFM12

1 Computer Engineering or Computer Science

Statement of Qualifications

Vaisala Radiotheodolite RT20

8 Anh Duong is head of our borders and maritime security. 9 division. She has years of experience with the U.S.

Trends in the Defense Industrial Base. Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy

HAZARDS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION TO ORDNANCE (HERO) CONCERNS DURING UXO LOCATION/REMEDIATION

Wide-Area Motion Imagery for Multi-INT Situational Awareness

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Company Profile Amertec Systems is a leading private manufacturer of electronic systems for the defense sector, having more than 20 years of experienc

The use of high frequency transducers, MHz, allowing the resolution to target a few cm thick in the first half meter suspect.

Guide to Inductive Moorings

EURONAVAL, 34 STARTUPS FOR THE SEANNOVATION SPACE

CUBESAT an OVERVIEW AEOLUS AERO TECH, Pvt. Ltd.

STARTRAK PIGGING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PIPELINE PIG MONITORING

ARCHIVED REPORT. Marine Technology - Archived 7/2005

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2002

Airborne Recording from a Ground Station Perspective

COMPANY RESTRICTED NOT EXPORT CONTROLLED NOT CLASSIFIED Your Name Document number Issue X FIGHTING THE BATTLE. Thomas Kloos, Björn Bengtsson

«Integrated Air Defence Systems - Countering Low Observable Airborne Threats»

MARINE GEOPHYSICAL PROVE-OUT AND SURVEY AT FLAG LAKE BOMBING RANGE BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, LOUISIANA

Microwave outdoor intrusion detection sensor

IONOSPHERE EFFECTS ON GPS/RF COMMUNICATION, ELECTRIC, METAL NETWORKS AND SPACECRAFTS OSMAN AKGÜN

DoD Research and Engineering Enterprise

FUGRO GROUP BUILDING AND INFRASTRUCTURE. TACKLING your complex challenges. UNDERSTANDING your operational objectives

DARPA developing Very Low Frequency (VLF) systems to provide GPS like position and timing technologies

Don t Let EMI/EMC Compliance Certification Slow You Down TUTORIAL

Introduction Objective and Scope p. 1 Generic Requirements p. 2 Basic Requirements p. 3 Surveillance System p. 3 Content of the Book p.

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

Brainstorm. In addition to cameras / Kinect, what other kinds of sensors would be useful?

Intelligent Robotics Sensors and Actuators

Proceedings of Al-Azhar Engineering 7 th International Conference Cairo, April 7-10, 2003.

DARPA Perspective on Space

On-line Partial Discharge Assessment and Monitoring of MV to EHV Cables

KNOWLEDGE BASE ARTICLE Coil Selection Guide

Photonic Power. Application Overview

Industrial-University Collaboration: A Long-Term, High-Value Example

Inductive Sensors. Fig. 1: Geophone

Ship Signatures Department (Code 70) Paul Luehr, Acting Department Head

STRIKE3 Standardization of GNSS Threat reporting and Receiver testing through International Knowledge Exchange, Experimentation and Exploitation

Special Projects Office. Mr. Lee R. Moyer Special Projects Office. DARPATech September 2000

WE SPECIALIZE IN MILITARY PNT Research Education Engineering

Exit point. Can you do it?

GeoRadar Division. Geosystems BU A HISTORY OF PROVIDING HIGH TECHNOLOGY. IDS s Pisa Headquarters

Subsea Wireless Communication Real World Considerations in an Offshore Environment

ABB FOCS Fiber-Optic Current Sensors. Make light work of dc current measurement

OFFSHORE ANALYSIS & RESEARCH SOLUTIONS HOUSTON PETROLEUM SURVEYORS GROUP PERSONNEL DATA PROCESSING PARTNERSHIPS

November 13, Hindu Temple, LTD Arbor Street Omaha, Nebraska Attn: Subject:

POWERING AMERICA S AND NEVADA S ADVANCED INDUSTRIES

Engineering Project Proposals

Teledyne Marine Oil and Gas.

SURVEYING THE UNDERGROUND

Old & New? INTRODUCTION. The Best Proximal Geophysical Detector Ever!

AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICS FOR SHALLOW OBJECT DETECTION: TECHNOLOGY UPDATE , (865) ,

Space and Missile Systems Center

2018 HSS Development

Autonomous Tactical Communications

Keysight Technologies A Flexible Testbed to Evaluate Potential Co-Existence Issues Between Radar and Wireless

GEOPHYSICAL ARCHAEOLOGY One Stop Shop We make it Visible for You!

MIL-STD June 1956 SUPERSEDING MIL-A-18123(SHIPS) 1 August 1954 MILITARY STANDARD

Investigation of Bridge Decks Utilizing Ground Penetrating Radar

ECEN 5004 (5014) Research like papers, proposal like presentations, conference like reviews

Transcription:

2015 Covert Tunnel Detection Technologies Homeland Security Research Corp.

Covert Tunnel Detection Technologies 2015 August 2015 Homeland Security Research Corp. (HSRC) is an international market and technology research firm specializing in the Homeland Security (HLS) & Public Safety (PS) Industry. HSRC provides premium market reports on present and emerging technologies and industry expertise, enabling global clients to gain time-critical insight into business opportunities. HSRC s clients include U.S. Congress, DHS, U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, NATO, DOD, DOT, GAO, and EU, among others; as well as HLS & PS government agencies in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Israel, Canada, UK, Germany, Australia, Sweden, Finland, Singapore. With over 750 private sector clients (72% repeat customers), including major defense and security contractors, and Fortune 500 companies, HSRC earned the reputation as the industry s Gold Standard for HLS & PS market reports. Washington D.C. 20004, 601 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Suite 900, Tel: 202-455-0966, info@hsrc.biz, www.homelandsecurityresearch.com Copyright 2015 HSRC. All rights reserved Copy #2015-081015-2 2

Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary... 4 1.1 Subterranean Warfare Technologies... 4 1.2 Tunnels & Underground Structures Detection: Technological Requirements... 7 1.2.1 Geophysical Information... 7 1.2.2 Geotechnical and other Challenges... 7 1.2.3 Key Geophysical Sensing Requirements... 8 List of Tables Table 1 - Subterranean Warfare Technologies: Advantages & Limitations... 5 Copyright 2015 HSRC. All rights reserved Copy #2015-081015-2 3

1 Executive Summary 1.1 Subterranean Warfare Technologies Subterranean Warfare Technologies includes many different sciences and technologies (see the table below) Semi-autonomous detect & attack robots can navigate and map tunnels and provide explosives chemical readings and provide the operators with video data and more. Another published technology used to detect both tunnels and human beings inside the tunnel uses analysis of surface seismic waves generated by movement of persons, existence of human electromagnetic emissions in the EL band, and measurements of changes in the geomagnetic field. Pipeline research on electro-optic technology can be used as part of a border wall to locate tunnels. Each technology, including positive and false error rates, would be included in the transnational analysis. However, reliance on hard science and technology is not enough. For example, the DHS reported that initially the agency explored the possibility of an unmanned aircraft equipped with radar technology that would fly along the border searching for tunnels. However, the scientists and border agents both realized that most of the existing tunnels are concentrated in large urban centers where they are difficult to spot with satellite images. Most traditional detection technologies are based on geophysical technology and they have had either little or no consistent or reliable success as a result of various limitations. The key technologies are shown below: Copyright 2015 HSRC. All rights reserved Copy #2015-081015-2 4

Table 1 - Subterranean Warfare Technologies: Advantages & Limitations Technology Advantages Limitations Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Low Cost Off the shelf technology Detects both active and silent tunnels Passive Seismic Off the shelf technology Detects active tunnels Fast acquisition Good lateral and vertical resolution Can resolve very small anomalies Continuous profiling Electrical Resistivity Tomography Off the shelf technology Detects both active and silent tunnels Good Vertical and lateral resolution Simple interpretation Microgravity Detects both active and silent tunnels Passive technology Very accurate Interpretation can give depth, size and type of anomaly Can be used on any terrain Cosmic-Muon Detectors Detects both active and silent tunnels GPR does not work well in moist mediums like clay or below the water table Depth limitation approximately 10-20 meter False alarms even at shallow depths are not uncommon the local geology and ecosystem Requires real-time detectors Expensive Requires powerful imaging software to filter out the waves' reactions to natural and manmade noises (e.g., highway traffic) Requires a wide-ranging network Needs to be permanently installed High Cost Interference from any conductor Not as effective in very conductive regions Requires very high precision (the gravity differential for smuggling tunnels is > 10 microgals, vs. the Earth's field of 800 gals) Expensive Technology Must be held at perfectly level at a constant temperature Requires a fence of Muon detectors Needs to be permanently installed Cost is developer dependent the local geology Copyright 2015 HSRC. All rights reserved Copy #2015-081015-2 5

Technology Advantages Limitations Electro- Magnetic Good lateral resolution Fast acquisition, no ground contact Magnetics Fast measurement Very sensitive to conductors Non-intrusive Seismic Reflection/ Diffraction Gives information of depth and composition Good lateral resolution Seismic Refraction Good lateral resolution Can resolve multiple layers Multichannel Analysis Of Surface Waves Not as sensitive to acoustic noise Fast acquisition Borehole Seismic Gives ground truth Very accurate Limited processing Fiber-Optic Cable Detects digging Low cost Fused Multi-Modal, Multi-Sensors System Subterrain Detect & Attack Robots Low error rate Hard to defeat High 3D Resolution Detect passive and Active Tunnels, etc. Stealth detection Can attack tunnels etc Subterranean Warfare game changer Force the rival to be use defensive measures Provide a symmetric sub terrain warfare Limited vertical resolution Tough to use in urban environments If no conductors is useless Sensitive to any surface conductor Sensitive to acoustic noise Extensive processing Sensitive to acoustic noise Needs large spread lengths Very Frequency dependent Low resolution Site needs boreholes Impracticable to drill at test sites Does not detect silent tunnels High cost Each system should be tailored to Require RDT&E investments Need to adapt to local eco-system and rival tactics Copyright 2015 HSRC. All rights reserved Copy #2015-081015-2 6

1.2 Tunnels & Underground Structures Detection: Technological Requirements 1.2.1 Geophysical Information Geophysical Analysis must be performed for each and every Tunnels & Underground Structures Detection project, Including: Depth of seismic sources Integrated infrasound ( Low Frequency sound) and meteorological data Rapid computation, interpretation of local & regional synthetics Workflow optimized analytical environment Cross-domain data fusion (no single geophysical method is applicable everywhere) Seismic (active and passive) Acoustic, Infrasound Electromagnetic Induction Resistivity Ground penetrating radar Local database of future sensor deployments 1.2.2 Geotechnical and other Challenges Geophysical and other Challenges must be studied for each and every Tunnels & Underground Structures Detection project, Including: Local sub terrain material (e.g. clays, magnetite, salt) Local sub terrain faults, fractures, joints, bedding, paleo-channels Local groundwater level Local seismic velocity Local sub terrain ground conductivity Vegetative cover Terrain Rain Space available Urban structures Underground Utilities Copyright 2015 HSRC. All rights reserved Copy #2015-081015-2 7

Utilities Power, Telephone, Cable Water, Sewer, Gas Utilities Overhead Power lines Vehicle traffic Manmade Structures, Fences Animal life Self-interference & friendly fire 1.2.3 Key Geophysical Sensing Requirements Sensing in a non-lab environment Sensor networks Common communications Pre-processing on node prior to exploration Size and power matter Trade-offs (minimize reduction in sensitivity or bandwidth) More robust and resilient sensors No reduction in sensitivity (e.g. sensitivity locked until sensor is in place) Stability Sensors that do not require frequent or lengthy calibrations No soaker hoses Noise cancellation versus isolation Advanced sensor concepts for noise reduction Common GPS time for all More information can be found at: Subterranean Warfare (Tunnels & Underground Structures Detection and Subterranean Robots) Technologies: Global Market 2015-2020 Copyright 2015 HSRC. All rights reserved Copy #2015-081015-2 8