Common Pools in Aquaculture Sui Generis and Other Options for Benefit Sharing

Common Pools in Aquaculture Sui Generis and Other Options for Benefit Sharing Senior research fellow, lawyer, and researcher Fridtjof Nansen Institute Seminar on Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity beyond National Jurisdiction, Bonn, 1.-3. December 2011

FNI s ABS Project Team FNI political science and law Studied biological diversity policy and law for almost 20 years Private independent Norwegian research institute Competence centre on biodiversity policy and law Capacity builiding and implementation consultations for countries: latest Bhutan 2011 and portugues-speaking African counties Looking at international law in a high number og foras: Patent law, IPR, WIPO, FAO, ITPGRFA, CGR etc Team of 7 researchers: Peter Johan Schei, Regine Andersen, Kristin Rosendal, Ole Kristian Fauchald, Morten Walløe Tvedt, Tone Winge, Ane Jørem

FNI s ABS Project Team FNI s role in ABS: reseach in political science and law Studied biological diversity policy and law for almost 20 years Private independent Norwegian research institute Competence centre on biodiversity policy and law Capacity builiding and implementation consultations for countries: latest Bhutan 2011 Looking at international law in a high number og foras: Patent law, IPR, WIPO, FAO, ITPGRFA, CGR etc Team of 7 researchers: Peter Johan Schei, Regine Andersen, Kristin Rosendal, Ole Kristian Fauchald, Morten Walløe Tvedt, Tone Winge, Ane Jørem

Components of the project: The first research area is international regulation of bioprospecting: What are the options for regulating rights and access to genetic material from the high seas, which is the area beyond national jurisdiction, the exclusive economic zone and in Antarctica, south of 60 degrees South. The second research area for this project is open source for marine-based innovation: the research question is how innovation may be stimulated and balanced in the marine sector by the use of an open source-based legal system for innovation. The third research area is to look at potential regulations of collections of marine genetic resources by discussing the particular situation of Marbank and research projects in bioprospecting: How to regulate access to and use of marine genetic resources from such collections in a manner that stimulates research, innovation and investment in this field?

Topic for today: Concept of common pools The multilateral approach of the ITPGRFA Concept of farmers rights under the ITPGRFA ABS licensing

Topic for today: Applicability of ABS as we know it from the CBD Concept of common pools The multilateral approach of the ITPGRFA Concept of farmers rights under the ITPGRFA ABS licensing Some ideas on institutions

Applicability of ABS as we know it from the CBD: Rational for ABS: Counter-balance the IPR/ privatisation tendency of plant sector Create a revenue for conservation and sustainable use Stop privatisation from the global common of PGR Developing countries quid pro quo for conservation Searching a rational for ABS in the ABNJ: Need for a revenue? Fairness? Equitable? Formally open to all de facto possible to the few ones

Applicability of ABS as known from CBD: Character of ABS in CBD and NP Sovereign rights Access legislation Contracts Genetic resources as an undefined object Freedom and flag state Open access No obvious contracting partner Activity rather than object Regulatory freedom learning from others Scope of activity and Clear trigger points Developed rational (convince counties that status quo should be altered) for A and/or BSh

Patent system: Invention eligible for patent protection Novel in the technical sense Inventiveness Technical effect Cover the same use by others even found in nature Relevant to establish private exclusive rights to objects found in the oceans

Concept of common pools: Theoretical explainations

common pool:

The multilateral approach of the ITPGRFA: The MLS applies to a group of genetic resources The MLS applies to material in the public domain and under the control of the parties The MLS applies for specific uses. The MLS applies in a group of countries.

The multilateral approach of the ITPGRFA: The MLS applies to a group of genetic resources Specified to be certain defined species of food and feed The MLS applies to material in the public domain and under the control of the parties Public collections and what is brought thereto The MLS applies for specific uses. Food and agriculture not other uses The MLS applies in a group of countries. Should a national from a non-member country access?

Concept of farmers rights under the ITPGRFA: Not very suited for securing the rights of an inventor Lack of legal certainty Lack of exclusivity

ABS licensing: Who shall issue the ABS license? Incentives to get a license Certification of equity or sustainability

NP ART 10 GLOBAL MULTILATERAL BENEFIT-SHARING MECHANISM: Parties shall consider the need for and modalities of a global multilateral benefit-sharing mechanism to address the fair and equitable sharing of benefits derived from the utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources that occur in transboundary situations or for which it is not possible to grant or obtain prior informed consent. The benefits shared by users of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources through this mechanism shall be used to support the conservation of biological diversity and the sustainable use of its components globally. (FNI Report 10/2011 http://www.fni.no/doc&pdf/fni-r1011.pdf)

sui generis: How can access to marine GR be secured also for the future? How can the investments put into products from marine bioprospecting be secured in a fair manner?

open source system: Learning from software (huge differences as number of developers larger than in GRresearch discussion) The previous contributors to the state What should be subject to openness) Genetic material, knowledge and innovation How to capture relative contribution IP: the patentee takes it all is it possible to establish a system being fair and equitable based on caculating contributions

open source system: Clear copying high degree of payment back Technological difficulties in assessing dependence Factual problems Legal challenges International aspects Challenge to all open source systems: the chance of free riders and even more severe persons appropriating from the pool Who will control?

Some ideas - Challenges in ABNJ:

Some ideas on institutions: ABNJ challenges: Freedom of the high seas quite difficult to amend Introduce jurisdiction at a level above flag state jurisdiction There are a some challenges which requires global solutions Bioprospecting Protect particular areas Pollution A non-binding safeguarder of the common interest (ombundsmann or learning from the Brazilian system of procurador ) Recommendations biology, law and sustainability Non-binding but autonomous outside the scope of nations Initiative: own, by others (states, privates and organisations)