Digital Hardcopy Xenon Light Stability. Test Report for. Mohawk Fine Papers, Inc.

Similar documents
Xenon Light Stabilty Testing MetalPrints vs. Long Lasting Photo Papers

Image Engineering printer and print life tests

Kodak Matchprint Inkjet Proofing Solution w/ Epson Stylus PRO 800 Printer for GRACoL Coated #1 Proofs

KODAK VISION Expression 500T Color Negative Film / 5284, 7284

How Long Will They Last? An Overview of the Light-Fading Stability of Inkjet Prints And Traditional Color Photographs

EASTMAN EXR 200T Film 5287, 7287

EASTMAN EXR 500T Film 5298

Improved Test Methods for Evaluating the Permanence of Digitally-Printed Photographs

Nekoosa Coated Products Carbonless Media Evaluation. 3 Part Carbonless Form Image Permanence Evaluation

Sony Digital Photography Paper. Paper makes the Picture.

Test of Inkjet Prints

EASTMAN EXR 200T Film / 5293, 7293

When color changes are evaluated by the human eye, all kinds of factors will affect the color perception:

KODAK PRIMETIME 640T Teleproduction Film / 5620,7620

The longevity of ink on paper for fine art prints. Carinna Parraman, Centre for Fine Print Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK

Image Permanence Comparing the Technologies

ChromaLife100+ Technology Guide

KODAK Panchromatic Separation Film 2238

Epson Stylus Pro 9600 Print Permanence Ratings

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Photography Processed photographic colour films and paper prints Methods for measuring image stability

FUJICOLOR CRYSTAL ARCHIVE PAPER SUPREME HIGH DEFINITION

The Influence of Relative Humidity on Short-Term Color Drift in Inkjet Prints

OPTICAL DENSITIES VS. GAMUT VOLUMES FOR IMAGE LIGHFASTNESS EVALUATION - AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

Accelerated Light Fading Test Results

The Determination of Humidity Limits to Prevent Colorant Bleed in Inkjet Prints

Yellowish Stain Formation in Inkjet Prints and Traditional Silver-Halide Color Photographs

Kodak Veris Digital Proofer for SWOP Coated #5

EASTMAN EKTACHROME High Speed Film (Tungsten) 7250

KODAK VERIS Digital Proofing System

Light Fastness of Epson UltraChrome HD versus Epson K3 inks: And the winner is

Kodak Approval Digital Color Imaging System For SWOP Coated #5 with 3333 Donors

A Survey of the Light Fading Stability of Digital Pictorial Reflection Prints

FUJIFLEX CRYSTAL ARCHIVE PRINTING MATERIAL

TECHNICAL DATA / COLOR REVERSAL FILM January 1998 E-154

Cost of Ink Per Page Analysis United States High Yield Cartridges. December 23, 2008

KODAK VISION 5263 / T Color Negative Film

TECHNICAL DATA / COLOR NEGATIVE FILM February 1998 E-44

Imaging materials Photographic reflection prints Methods for measuring indoor light stability

Selecting suitable enclosures for digitally printed materials

KODAK AEROCHROME III MS Film 2427

TECHNICAL DATA / COLOR PAPER July 2003 E-23

Colorimetry vs. Densitometry in the Selection of Ink-jet Colorants

Using KODAK Control Strips for Processes AR-5 and AN-6

KODAK EKTACHROME 64T Professional Film

EFI Fiery Printer Profiler The impact of the black separation settings. Oliver Schorn, Senior Color Management & Research Engineer

SNAP Certification. 1/013/14 Version 1

EPSON Color Proofer 9600

Epson SureColor P400 Printer Print Permanence Ratings 1

TECHNICAL DATA / COLOR PAPER July 2003 E-19

1 MPTVI DATA SHEET XXXXXXXXXXX

Kodak EasyShare 5300 Print Permanence Ratings 1

Substrate Correction in ISO

EASTMAN PLUS-X Reversal Film / 7276

Conforming to the ICH Guideline for the Photostability Testing of New Drug Substances and Drug Products (ICH Q1B) Using the Atlas SUNTEST CPS+

KODAK Matchprint M150DP KODAK Matchprint M120DP

EASTMAN TRI-X Reversal Film 7278

The New Standard in Lightfastness Testing. Q-Sun B02 Xenon Lightfastness Tester. The Lightfastness Specialists

Ink Tank Printers by HP, Epson, Canon, and Brother (with Dye-Based Color Inks) WIR Print Permanence Ratings 1

ST-53-X-ISO Dynamic Range Film Target Product Specifications

Kodak Approval Digital Color Imaging System for GRACoL Coated #1 Proofs

Remote Director. Sony 23 SDM-P232W. Collaborative Soft Proofing using the I. MANUFACTURER INTRODUCTION. SWOP Application Data Sheet

Image Quality. Stylus Pro 9890 Stylus Pro 7890

Accuracy in Photo Print Life Prediction

Cost of Ink Per Page Analysis United States

ELITE Chrome 400 Film

KODAK ROYAL Digital Paper

KODAK PROFESSIONAL ENDURA Transparency and Clear Display

Kodak ESP-9 Printer Print Permanence Ratings (preliminary 1 )

HP Photosmart Pro B8850 Print Permanence Ratings 1

KODAK EKTACHROME RADIANCE III Paper

Ink Tank Printers by HP, Epson, Canon, and Brother (with Dye-Based Color Inks) WIR Print Permanence Ratings 1

NIP24 IMAGE PERMANENCE Accuracy in Photo Print Life Prediction

PRODUCT INFORMATION BULLETIN

ELITE Chrome 100 Film

KODAK PROFESSIONAL EKTACHROME Films E100G and E100GX Grain as Fine as Your Art.

Epson SureColor P7000 and P9000 Print Permanence Ratings 1

10 ROTARY-TUBE PROCESSORS

Specifications for Epson Expression Premium XP-800

KODAK EKTACHROME 100 Plus Professional Film

The Technology of Duotone Color Transformations in a Color Managed Workflow

Remote Director Version 2.6 with the Apple 20 LCD Display

HP Designjet Z2100 and Z3100 Printers Deliver Professional Quality, Durable Prints

SURFACE VEHICLE STANDARD

Epson Stylus Pro 7700 Print Permanence Ratings (preliminary 1 )

HP Designjet Z6100 Printer Series

FUJICOLOR CRYSTAL ARCHIVE PAPER SUPREME <NEW>

KODAK PROFESSIONAL ELITE Chrome 200 Film

Epson SureColor P7000 and P9000 Print Permanence Ratings 1

Fig Color spectrum seen by passing white light through a prism.

KODAK High Definition 400 Film

DENSITOMETRY. By Awadhoot Shendye

Brother MFC-490cw Print Permanence Ratings (preliminary 1 )

FUJICOLOR CRYSTAL ARCHIVE PAPER TYPE CA

Permanence of Inkjet Prints in Relation to Typographic and Colorimetric Characteristics

Computer Output Microfilm Data Sheet

KODAK PROFESSIONAL ELITE COLOR Films / 200 and 400

CHAPTER-V SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Epson Stylus NX400 Print Permanence Ratings 1

Hewlett-Packard Photosmart 8450 Print Permanence Ratings

Epson Stylus Photo R2880 Print Permanence Ratings 1

Transcription:

Digital Hardcopy Xenon Light Stability Test Report for Mohawk Fine Papers, Inc. Andrea Venosa Image Permanence Institute Rochester Institute of Technology 7 Lomb Memorial Drive Rochester, NY 14623-564 (585) 475-5199 (585) 475-723 (Fax)

Introduction Mohawk Fine Papers, Inc. contracted with the Image Permanence Institute (IPI) to run comparative xenon light stability tests on a target (ink/media combination) provided by them to be exposed in two independent arrangements: with UV glass or without glass. Procedure Light stability studies were conducted on one digital print (one ink/paper combination), simulating daylight through window glass for approximately 5 years. For this test, a Q-Sun Xenon Test Chamber with an illumination intensity of 5 kilolux was used. Window-Q filters were placed between the xenon lamps and the samples. The prints were exposed to the high-intensity xenon light for a total of 82 days in two different settings: with UV filtering framing glass or without framing glass. Eighty-two days of constant, high-intensity exposure is approximately equivalent to 5 years of display under daylight through a window, assuming a typical display intensity of 45 lux for 12 hours per day. Samples were placed on the specimen tray mounted in holders. The samples placement on the tray was rotated weekly to account for the asymmetry of the position of the light source with respect to each sample. The temperature and humidity across the specimen plane were 7 F ±5 F and 5% RH ±3% RH.. The following sample names were provided by Mohawk Fine Papers, Inc. and will be used throughout this report: Strathmore Pure Cotton Inkjet, Clean White Hot Press Smooth 3 gsm / 9-ink Epson Ultrachrome HD / No glass Strathmore Pure Cotton Inkjet, Clean White Hot Press Smooth 3 gsm / 9-ink Epson Ultrachrome HD / With UV glass Test targets consisting of cyan, magenta, yellow, red, green, and blue patches each at ten levels of darkness, and black patches at twenty levels of darkness in roughly equal increments, were provided by Mohawk Fine Papers, Inc.. All target patches were measured in Status A visual, red, green, and blue

density using a GretagMacbeth Spectrolino spectrophotometer before testing and at one week intervals during exposure. In density mode, this device conforms to ANSI/NAPM Standard IT2.17-1995, ANSI/NAPM Standard IT2.18-1996, ANSI/NAPM Standard IT2.19-1994, ISO Standard 5-4:1995, ISO Standard 5-3:1995, and ISO Standard 5-2:1991. Sample patches were read in ANSI/ISO Status A visual, red, green, and blue as specified in ANSI/NAPM Standard IT2.18-1996 and ISO Standard 5-3:1995. Results for each material are based on the averages of the two replicates corresponding to each sample. The calculations used to determine the amount of colorant fading suffered by the samples during testing (calculated as percentage of change from original density) are described below: Percent Density Change in Pure Primary Color Patches a) Pure cyan: %DdC(R) t = [(dc(r) t - dc(r) ) dc(r) ] 1 b) Pure magenta: %DdM(G) t = [(dm(g) t - dm(g) ) dm(g) ] 1 c) Pure yellow: %DdY(B) t = [(dy(b) t - dy(b) ) dy(b) ] 1 Percent Density Change in Secondary (Mixed) Color Patches d) Magenta in Red: %DdR(G) t = [(dr(g) t - dr(g) ) dr(g) ] 1 e) Yellow in Red: %DdR(B) t = [(dr(b) t - dr(b) ) dr(b) ] 1 f) Cyan in Green: %DdG(R) t = [(dg(r) t - dg(r) ) dg(r) ] 1 g) Yellow in Green: %DdG(B) t = [(dg(b) t - dg(b) ) dg(b) ] 1 h) Cyan in Blue: %DdB(R) t = [(db(r) t - db(r) ) db(r) ] 1 i) Magenta in Blue: %DdB(G) t = [(db(g) t - db(g) ) db(g) ] 1 Percent Density Change in Composite Neutral Patch j) Cyan in neutral: %DdN(R) t = [(dn(r) t - dn(r) ) dn(r) ] 1 k) Magenta in neutral: %DdN(G) t = [(dn(g) t - dn(g) ) dn(g) ] 1 l) Yellow in neutral: %DdN(B) t = [(dn(b) t - dn(b) ) dn(b) ] 1 The calculations used to determine the color balance in neutral (composite neutral, gray) density patch (calculated as the percent of average density) are described below:

Percent Color Shift in Composite Neutral Patch a) Cyan-magenta shift: % dn(r-g) t = % dn(r) t - % dn(g) t b) Magenta-yellow shift: % dn(g-b) t = % dn(g) t - % dn(b) t c) Yellow-cyan shift: % dn(b-r) t = % dn(b) t - % dn(r) t The calculations used to determine the changes in d min are described below: Changes in d min a) Red density change: Dd min (R) t = d min (R) t d min (R) b) Green density change: D d min (G) t = d min (G) t d min (G) c) Blue density change: D d min (B) t = d min (B) t d min (B) Other than d min stain, all parameter calculations were performed for an initial density of.5 and 1.. The Standard does not specify applicable acceptable endpoints because the amount of image change that can be tolerated is subjective, and will vary with the product type and specific consumer or institutional requirements. The endpoints selected by IPI agree with the illustrative endpoints chosen by the ISO 1899:26. The overall predicted display life is based on the time to reach the first of the endpoints given below. Parameter Patch Endpoint Cyan fade Pure cyan 3% loss Magenta fade Pure magenta 3% loss Yellow fade Pure yellow 3% loss Black fade Pure black 3% loss Magenta fade Red 3% loss Yellow fade Red 3% loss Cyan fade Green 3% loss

Yellow fade Green 3% loss Cyan fade Blue 3% loss Magenta fade Blue 3% loss Cyan fade Composite neutral 3% loss Magenta fade Composite neutral 3% loss Yellow fade Composite neutral 3% loss Red-green color balance Composite neutral 15% change Red-blue color balance Composite neutral 15% change Green-blue color balance Composite neutral 15% change Parameter Patch Endpoint Cyan stain White +.1 Magenta stain White +.1 Yellow stain White +.1 Note that all the predictions are based on the following assumptions: 1. Only photochemical reactions are responsible for optical changes in the colorants. 2. The reaction rates are governed only by the amount of light. In other words, the rate-determining step depends only on the rate that photons are delivered to the reaction. 3. Light fading obeys reciprocity law. Reciprocity law says that the total chemical change is constant for a given constant exposure, independent of the intensity, where exposure equals intensity multiplied by time. 4. Only daylight used for typical display. 5. The intensity of the typical display condition is 45 lux. 6. The exposure time for typical display is 12 hours per day.

Results Predicted years to reach endpoints in the.5 density patches are given in the table below: Predicted Years to Endpoint.5 density patches Strathmore Pure Cotton Inkjet, Clean White Hot Press Smooth 3 gsm / 9-ink Epson Ultrachrome HD Sample Without glass With UV glass Cyan fade 21 47 Magenta fade 38 Yellow fade 13 33 Black fade 37 Magenta fade (Red) 38 Yellow fade (Red) 16 35 Cyan fade (Green) 24 Yellow fade (Green) 15 34 Cyan fade (Blue) 27 Magenta fade (Blue) 42 Cyan fade (neutral patch) 31 Magenta fade (neutral patch) 47 Yellow fade (neutral patch) Red-green color balance Red-blue color balance Green-blue color balance Predicted years to reach endpoints in the 1. density patches are given in the table below:

Predicted Years to Endpoint 1. density patches Strathmore Pure Cotton Inkjet, Clean White Hot Press Smooth 3 gsm / 9-ink Epson Ultrachrome HD Sample Without glass With UV glass Cyan fade 24 Magenta fade Yellow fade 2 Black fade Magenta fade (Red) Yellow fade (Red) 37 Cyan fade (Green) 46 Yellow fade (Green) 25 Cyan fade (Blue) Magenta fade (Blue) Cyan fade (neutral patch) Magenta fade (neutral patch) Yellow fade (neutral patch) Red-green color balance Red-blue color balance Green-blue color balance None of the materials reached endpoint criteria for d min density gain. Discussion and Conclusions Measurements Colorant Fade. The sample tested, Strathmore Pure Cotton Inkjet, Clean White Hot Press Smooth 3 gsm / 9-ink Epson Ultrachrome HD, reached its endpoint due to colorant fade in both exposure configurations (without glass and

with UV glass). Although UV glass mitigated the effect of light considerably, it was not enough to prevent the sample from reaching the endpoint. See Appendixes A and B for graphs. Stain. Th sample did not show significant signs of staining (discoloration of the media) during the light exposure. See Appendix C for graphs. Color Balance. This parameter is analyzed with the purpose of determining the degree to which image neutrality has been affected due to light fading. There should be a relatively equal colorant loss (cyan, magenta and yellow) for the image to remain neutral. When this loss is unequal (crosses the ±15% limit), the image will exhibit a specific color cast, and original colors may show shift in hue. The sample did not reach an endpoint for color balance during the exposure. See Appendixes A and B for graphs. Visual Observations The visual assessment of all the samples matched the numerical interpretations for the color patches. Overall Life Expectancy The following table indicates simulated years of exposure to reach the first endpoint. Predicted Years to Reach First Endpoint Sample Image area (.5 density) Image area (1. density) Without glass 13 24 With UV glass 33 >5 It must be understood that these results pertain exclusively to the particular array of materials tested including printer, colorant, and media.

Appendix A Graphs of Densitometry-based Changes in Samples during Exposure in Patches.5 Density Units

Percent Cyan Colorant Retention in.5 Density Pure Cyan Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Cyan Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Magenta Colorant Retention in.5 Density Pure Magenta Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Magenta Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Yellow Colorant Retention in.5 Density Pure Yellow Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Yellow Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Black Colorant Retention in.5 Density Pure Black Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Black Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Magenta Colorant Retention in.5 Density Red Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Magenta Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Yellow Colorant Retention in.5 Density Red Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Yellow Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Cyan Colorant Retention in.5 Density Green Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Cyan Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Yellow Colorant Retention in.5 Density Green Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Yellow Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Cyan Colorant Retention in.5 Density Blue Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Cyan Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Magenta Colorant Retention in.5 Density Blue Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Magenta Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Cyan Colorant Retention in.5 Density Neutral Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Cyan Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Magenta Colorant Retention in.5 Density Neutral Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Magenta Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Yellow Colorant Retention in.5 Density Neutral Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Yellow Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Red Green Color Imbalance in.5 Density Neutral Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 1 8 6 Percent Red Green Color Imbalance 4 2-2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Endpoint +15% Endpoint -15% -4-6 -8-1

Percent Red Blue Color Imbalance in.5 Density Neutral Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 1 8 6 Percent Red Blue Color Imbalance 4 2-2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Endpoint +15% Endpoint -15% -4-6 -8-1

Percent Green Blue Color Imbalance in.5 Density Neutral Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 1 8 6 Percent Green Blue Color Imbalance 4 2-2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Endpoint +15% Endpoint -15% -4-6 -8-1

Appendix B Graphs of Densitometry-based Changes in Samples during Exposure in Patches 1. Density Units

Percent Cyan Colorant Retention in 1. Density Pure Cyan Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Cyan Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Magenta Colorant Retention in 1. Density Pure Magenta Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Magenta Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Yellow Colorant Retention in 1. Density Pure Yellow Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Yellow Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Black Colorant Retention in 1. Density Pure Black Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Black Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Magenta Colorant Retention in 1. Density Red Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Magenta Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Yellow Colorant Retention in 1. Density Red Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Yellow Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Cyan Colorant Retention in 1. Density Green Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Cyan Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Yellow Colorant Retention in 1. Density Green Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Yellow Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Cyan Colorant Retention in 1. Density Blue Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Cyan Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Magenta Colorant Retention in 1. Density Blue Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Magenta Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Cyan Colorant Retention in 1. Density Neutral Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Cyan Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Magenta Colorant Retention in 1. Density Neutral Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Magenta Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Yellow Colorant Retention in 1. Density Neutral Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 12 1 Percent Yellow Colorant Retention 8 6 4 Endpoint 7% 2 1 2 3 4 5 6

Percent Red Green Color Imbalance in 1. Density Neutral Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 1 8 6 Percent Red Green Color Imbalance 4 2-2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Endpoint +15% Endpoint -15% -4-6 -8-1

Percent Red Blue Color Imbalance in 1. Density Neutral Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 1 8 6 Percent Red Blue Color Imbalance 4 2-2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Endpoint +15% Endpoint -15% -4-6 -8-1

Percent Green Blue Color Imbalance in 1. Density Neutral Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH) 1 8 6 Percent Green Blue Color Imbalance 4 2-2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Endpoint +15% Endpoint -15% -4-6 -8-1

Appendix C Graphs of Densitometry-based Changes in Samples during Exposure in d min

Cyan Stain in Dmin Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH).2.16 Red Density Change.12.8 Endpoint.1.4 1 2 3 4 5 6 -.4

Magenta Stain in Dmin Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH).2.16 Green Density Change.12.8 Endpoint.1.4 1 2 3 4 5 6 -.4

Yellow Stain in Dmin Patch During Exposure to 5 Kilolux Filtered Xenon Arc Light (25ºC and 5%RH).2.16 Blue Density Change.12.8 Endpoint.1.4 1 2 3 4 5 6 -.4