Wallops CubeSat-SmallSat Ground Stations and Frequency Standardization

Similar documents
NASA Near Earth Network (NEN) Support for Lunar and L1/L2 CubeSats Scott Schaire April 2017

CUBESAT COMMUNICATION DIRECTION AND CAPABILITIES AT MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY AND NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, WALLOPS FLIGHT FACILITY

X-band CubeSat Communication System Demonstration

High Speed Data Downlink for NSF Space Weather CubeSats

CubeSat Communications Review and Concepts. Workshop, July 2, 2009

Expanding CubeSat Capabilities with a Low Cost Transceiver

Hawk Institute for Space Sciences. Firefly Comms Plan. November 30, 2009

DYNAMIC IONOSPHERE CUBESAT EXPERIMENT

RAX: The Radio Aurora explorer

1. Discuss in detail the Design Consideration of a Satellite Communication Systems. [16]

High Speed, Low Cost Telemetry Access from Space Development Update on Programmable Ultra Lightweight System Adaptable Radio (PULSAR)

Exploiting Link Dynamics in LEO-to-Ground Communications

Expanding CubeSat Capabilities with a Low Cost Transceiver

Improving CubeSat Communications

The FAST, Affordable, Science and Technology Satellite (FASTSAT) Mission

Technician Licensing Class

Interplanetary CubeSat Launch Opportunities and Payload Accommodations

DRONACHARYA GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS, GREATER NOIDA. SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (EEC 021) QUESTION BANK

RAX: Lessons Learned in Our Spaceflight Endeavor

New Small Satellite Capabilities for Microwave Atmospheric Remote Sensing: The Earth Observing Nanosatellite- Microwave (EON-MW)

Annex B: HEO Satellite Mission

Large, Deployable S-Band Antenna for a 6U Cubesat

DICE Telemetry Overview and Current Status

(SDR) Based Communication Downlinks for CubeSats

Update on MHz Band for CubeSat High Speed Data Downlink

Opportunistic Vehicular Networks by Satellite Links for Safety Applications

SATELLIT COMMUNICATION

A Feasibility Study of Techniques for Interplanetary Microspacecraft Communications

GeneSat-1 Quick Look Mission Report

A High-Speed Data Downlink for Wide-Bandwidth CubeSat Payloads

Lunar and Lagrangian Point L1/L2 CubeSat Communication and Navigation Considerations

W-Band Satellite Transmission in the WAVE Mission

High Speed, Low Cost Telemetry Access from Space Development Update on Programmable Ultra Lightweight System Adaptable Radio (PULSAR)

X band downlink for CubeSat

NASA ELaNa IV Launch

KySat-2: Status Report and Overview of C&DH and Communications Systems Design

The Future of CubeSat Communications: Transitioning Away from Amateur Radio Frequencies for High-speed Downlinks

Satellite Communications. Chapter 9

Satellite Communications. Chapter 9

Microwave Radiometers for Small Satellites

ECE 6390: Satellite Communications and Navigation Systems TEST 1 (Fall 2004)

MarCO: Ready for Launch Andrew Klesh, Joel Krajewski

SmallSat Access to Space

I SARA 08/10/13. Pre-Decisional Information -- For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only

Recommendation ITU-R M (09/2015)

Primary POC: Prof. Hyochoong Bang Organization: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology KAIST POC

Integration and Test of the Microwave Radiometer Technology Acceleration (MiRaTA) CubeSat

PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE. Inter-satellite omnidirectional optical communicator for remote sensing

SPACOMM 2009 PANEL. Challenges and Hopes in Space Navigation and Communication: From Nano- to Macro-satellites

Spacecraft Communications

HEMERA Constellation of passive SAR-based micro-satellites for a Master/Slave configuration

The Nemo Bus: A Third Generation Nanosatellite Bus for Earth Monitoring and Observation

Iridium NEXT SensorPODs: Global Access For Your Scientific Payloads

JPL Does Cubesats. Tony Freeman* Manager, Innova1on Foundry. April 2013

Figure 1. Proposed Mission Operations Functions. Key Performance Parameters Success criteria of an amateur communicator on board of Moon-exploration

2009 CubeSat Developer s Workshop San Luis Obispo, CA

CubeSat Proximity Operations Demonstration (CPOD) Vehicle Avionics and Design

A CubeSat Radio Beacon Experiment

A Scalable Deployable High Gain Reflectarray Antenna - DaHGR

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA (Question ITU-R 131/7) a) that telecommunications between the Earth and stations in deep space have unique requirements;

2009 Small Satellite Conference Logan, Utah

Low-Profile Antenna Package for Efficient Inter-CubeSat Communication in S- and V-band. C. Vourch & T. Drysdale

IAC-11.B FASTSAT Mission Results from the Space Test Program S26 Mission. Steve Cook Dynetics, USA,

Protection criteria for Cospas-Sarsat local user terminals in the band MHz

DLR s Optical Communications Program for 2018 and beyond. Dr. Sandro Scalise Institute of Communications and Navigation

K/Ka Band for Space Operation Services, Pros and Cons. ITU International Satellite Symposium 2017 Ing. Hernan Sineiro

High Data Rate Communications in CubeSat Swarms C. Vourch & T. Drysdale. Electronics and Nanoscale Engineering Research Division

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

Earth Station and Flyaway

GSAW 2014 Session 11C Current and Future Ground Systems for CubeSats Working Group

Lunar Exploration Communications Relay Microsatellite

Digital Communications Theory. Phil Horkin/AF7GY Satellite Communications Consultant

The Colorado Student Space Weather Experiment (CSSWE) On-Orbit Performance

Antennas Orbits Modulation Noise Link Budgets U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Spacecraft Communications MARYLAND. Principles of Space Systems Design

Geoff Crowley, Chad Fish, Charles Swenson, Gary Bust, Aroh Barjatya, Miguel Larsen, and USU Student Team

Characteristics, definitions and spectrum requirements of nanosatellites and picosatellites, as well as systems composed of such satellites

Future DSN Capabilities

SATELLITE SUBSYSTEMS. Networks and Communication Department. Dr. Marwah Ahmed

UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI Radio Frequency Interference in Satellite Communications Systems

Future DSN Capabilities

Solar Observing Low-frequency Array for Radio Astronomy (SOLARA)

AMSAT Fox Satellite Program

THE OPS-SAT NANOSATELLITE MISSION

The NSF Cubesat Program

A Technical Background of the ZACUBE-i Satellite Mission Series. Francois Visser

Outernet: Development of a 1U Platform to Enable Low Cost Global Data Provision

B ==================================== C

Incorporating a Test Flight into the Standard Development Cycle

Design of a Free Space Optical Communication Module for Small Satellites

Chapter 3 Solution to Problems

ECE 6390: Satellite Communications and Navigation Systems TEST 1 (Fall 2010)

BENEFITS FOR DEPLOYABLE QUADRIFILAR HELICAL ANTENNA MODULES FOR SMALL SATELLITES

Deep Space Communication The further you go, the harder it gets. D. Kanipe, Sept. 2013

Keeping Amateur Radio in Space 21st Century Challenges and. Opportunities for AMSAT

MISSION OPERATION FOR THE KUMU A`O CUBESAT. Zachary K. Lee-Ho Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Hawai i at Mānoa Honolulu, HI 96822

ISIS Innovative Solutions In Space B.V.

Amateur Radio Satellites

Satellite Sub-systems

AMSAT Fox-1 CubeSat Series JERRY BUXTON VICE PRESIDENT - ENGINEERING

Transcription:

Wallops CubeSat-SmallSat Ground Stations and Frequency Standardization Scott Schaire with contributions from Serhat Altunc, Wayne Powell, Ben Malphrus August, 2013 Wallops UHF on left, S-Band on right NASA/GSFC/Wallops Flight Facility Scott.h.schaire@Nasa.gov Morehead State University b.malphrus@morehead-st.edu

Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) GSFC is the largest combined organization of scientists and engineers in the United States dedicated to increasing knowledge of the Earth, the Solar System, and the Universe via observations from space Identify and aggressively pursue technology advancements that enable science breakthroughs Wallops is a Part of Goddard 2

GSFC/Wallops Small Satellite Mission Mission: GSFC/WFF enables new and exciting science, technology, and educational Small Satellite missions, by providing low-cost value- added services and technologies at the request of the Principal Investigator GSFC/WFF Services and Facilities Mission Planning Engineering Mechanical Thermal Guidance, Navigation & Control Command & Data Handling Communication Power Systems Propulsion Project Management Integration and Test Mission Operations Frequency Policy Communication Solutions Groundstations Range Ground Network TRL Advancement on suborbital carriers Science Collaboration GSFC/WFF Technologies Deployers Transporters Ground stations Tools/Processes Miniaturized Instruments Radios Attitude Determination and Control Antennas Propulsion Increased Reliability Command & Data Handling 3

Some Cool Technologies for Small Satellites Testing a CubeSat (A) on a balloon Fraction of the cost of a satellite mission Payload is recovered Up to 120,000 for hours/days Wallops arc-second pointer (L) (WASP) successfully demonstrated pointing balloon-borne telescopes at inertial targets with arc-second accuracy Wallops Small Satellite Transporter Mounts to an ESPA ring Vehicle to transport small satellites, primarily CubeSats, to destinations currently not practical through means of standard delivery via ejection from launch vehicles Removes propulsion burden from the small satellite and helps them retain the smaller form factor 6U CubeSat on a Balloon Gondola Wallops Small Satellite Transporter Mounted to an ESPA Ring 4

Wallops /Morehead CubeSat Groundstation Network Wallops UHF Groundstation Specifications Built 1959 by MIT Lincoln Labs Valued at $20M Beamwidth: 2.9 degrees Frequency Range: 380 to 480 MHz Frequency Band: UHF-Band Secondary Frequency Band: X-Band available for future high data rate CubeSat communication Antenna Main Beam Gain: 35 dbi Diameter: 18.3 meters (60 ) Wallops UHF CubeSat Groundstation Use Cutting-Edge CubeSat communication over a government-licensed UHF frequency allocation that enables high data rates (3.0 Mbit/Sec) Currently communicating with DICE spacecraft Slated for use for Firefly, MicroMAS, MiRaTA, CeREs and many proposed CubeSats Future Capability at Morehead State NSF funding a backup UHF capability with around 37 dbi gain at UHF-band at Morehead State University using their 21 meter X, S-band dish. Morehead State University 21 Meter antenna Wallops UHF on left, S-Band on right 5

Wallops-Morehead Ground Network (NWMGN) Two large-aperture Earth Stations: o Wallops UHF Radar CubeSat Ground Station o Morehead State University 21-Meter Ground Station NWMGN can provide services to a wide variety of mission customers at multiple frequency bands through all phases of a mission s lifetime o Low-earth orbits (LEO) o Geosynchronous orbits (GEO) o Lagrange point orbits o Lunar o Inner solar system missions Morehead State University 21 Meter antenna NWMGN services are contracted through the NASA Wallops Flight Facility Wallops UHF on left, S-Band on right 6

UHF for LunarCube Communication Data Rate S/C Antenna Downlink-kbps Low Gain Dipole(dBi)-Linear Polarization 1.5 Medium Gain(dBi)-Linear Polarization 6 High Gain Deployable(dBi)-Circular Polarization 50 Uplink Data Rate is a function of the ground amplifier 19.2 Kbits/sec Uplink with a 100W amplifier Downlink with a 2W satellite transmitter ranges from 1.5 to 50 Kbits/sec depending on the satellite antenna Calculation assumptions Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) maximum slant range of 406,094 km Wallops UHF CubeSat Groundstation G/T of 10.6 db/k L-3 Cadet UHF CubeSat Radio 7

Standardization of CubeSat Frequency Authorization and Recommendations Preparing a White Paper focused on establishment of a blanket authorization policy for allocating a band segment for Government CubeSats similar to that allocated to amateurs Precursor to advancing radios and antennas for CubeSats and small satellites Minimize the time required to obtain an authorization and to establish the availability of existing NASA ground resources for support of Government CubeSats Coordinating with NASA HQ SCaN Space Communications and Navigation (SCaN) X-band communication system is being considered to increase the data rate for CubeSats/small satellites In discussions with University of Colorado Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (LASP) regarding development of a X- band radio for CubeSats, small satellites, and sounding rockets Also in discussion with MSFC on a X-band radio can support up to 150 Mbps Working with University of Michigan and JEM engineering on CubeSat antennas 8

Transceiver Candidates Board TRL Flight Heritage Frequency Bands Data Rate Mass (g) Output Power(watt) Volume(cm^3) Modulation/FEC Tethers Unlimited TRL5 No S-band- 2450MHz 400 kbps 380 1 10X10X3.5 BPSK/FEC can be added MHX-2420 TRL9 RAX, DOVE S-band 230 kbps Downlink/11 5 kbps Uplink 75 1 8.9X5.3X1.8 FSK/FSK AstroDev Lithium Radio TRL9 RAX, Firefly, CXBN, CSSWE, CINEMA UHF S-band being developed 9.6 kbps, 38.4 kbps, 76.8 kbps 52 250 mw 4 W 10X6.5X3.3 FSK/GMSK TRL9 DICE, MicroMAS, MiRaTA, CeREs UHF 24Mbps downlink/25 0 kbps uplink 215 2 6.9X6.9X1.3 OPSK/FSK,GMSK : TurboFEC/Convol utionalcoding L3 Cadet TRL4 No S-band 24Mbps downlink/uhf downlink/25 uplink 0 kbps uplink 215 2 6.9X6.9X1.3 OPSK/FSK,GMSK : TurboFEC/Convol utionalcoding Nimitz Radio TRL3 No S-band 50 Downlink/UHF kbps/1mbps uplinlk 500 1 9X9.6X1.4 Uplink FSK, GFSK Downlink BPSK MSFC TRL 7 FASTSat2 S and X-band downlink/sband Uplink 150 mbps/50kbps uplink <1kg 2 10.8X10.8X7.6 BPSK/OQPSK - LDPC 7/8 9

NASA Ground Stations Options Exist in the Following Frequency Ranges and G/T performances X Band downlink via Ground Network and Poker Flat 8200-8500 MHz G/T= 34.5 db/k S Band via the ground network 2200-2400 MHz Cost of using NASA s GN and S band may be prohibitive for low budget satellites Wallops Range 2200-2400 MHz Downlink and 2025-2120 MHz uplink Range resources G/T= 23 db/k Upper S band 2700-2900MHz Wallops SPANDAR S-band Radar dish G/T= 29 db/k UHF 380 to 480 MHz Wallops UHF CubeSat groundstation Morehead UHF, X, S band CubeSat groundstation Government Frequency licenses are secondary G/T=10.6 db/k 10

Interference Concern Prior to requesting a specific downlink frequency the spectrum must be monitored at that frequency at all the sites where that frequency is to be received to assure that no R.F. interference will exist within that bandwidth to be received and sufficient guard band exists from adjacent emissions. 11

Additional Considerations and Recommendations Recommend avoiding the use of S band for SmallSat and CubeSat downlinks and instead designing to use the NASA Ground Network (GN) (X-band down, S-band up). NASA GN antennas provide S band command uplink and X band telemetry downlink support from the same antenna and provide existing world wide connectivity generally required for NASA missions NASA GN supports equatorial thru polar orbital inclinations Consideration should be given to development of a transponder for CubeSats capable of S band command reception and X band downlink telemetry at power levels needed to support anticipated link margins Recommended X band downlink modulation is OQPSK and uplink should be compatible with the NASA GN X band downlink use Low Density Parity Coding 7/8 and uplink should adapt standards compatible with NASA GN command modulation formats Standardized flight communications hardware should be developed and adapted to enable a one time NTIA Spectrum Certification for all Government funded CubeSat missions thereby eliminating the time required for the first step of the two-step process. The GN ground systems already have NTIA Spectrum Certification for the first step of the process. 12

Questions Scott Schaire (WFF): 757-824-1120 scott.h.schaire@nasa.gov Ben Malphrus: 606-783-2212 b.malphrus@moreheadstate.edu 13

Backup 14

UHF-, S- and X-band Performance Comparison UHF band : 10.6 db/k S-Band: 23 db/k Delta : 12.4 db/k versus UHF-band X-band: 34.5 db/k- Delta : 23.9 db/k versus UHF, 11.5 db/k versus S-band X-band antennas/communication systems are compact UHF-band has significant Interference Performance enhancement by utilizing higher gain compact X-band communication systems instead of UHF or S-band communication systems. Using antennas gain delta 5-10 db comparing UHF with X-band X-band systems can support 150 Mbps: FastSat2 and LCT2 X-band communication system offers real science missions with Cube/Small Satellites However one should also consider increase in free space loss associated with higher frequencies 15

Collaborated with Univ. Of Mich. on on Electrically Small Printed Helical Antennas to compensate slant range differences [1] C. Pfeiffer, A. Grbic, X. Xu, and S. R. Forrest, New methods to analyze and fabricate electrically small antennas, in Proc. IEEE Antennas Propag. Int. Symp., 2011, pp. 761 764. 16