PIERS ONLINE, VOL. 3, NO. 3, 27 29 A CRLH Microstrip Delay Line for High-speed Electronic Circuits S. Sebak, L. Zhu, V. K. Devabhaktuni, and C. Wang Department of ECE, Concordia University 14 de Maisonneuve West, Montreal, H3G 1M8, Canada Abstract In this paper, we present a composite right/left-handed microstrip delay line, which simultaneously exhibits negative refractive index and negative group-delay. The proposed structure shows advantages of compact dimensions, lower loss, and longer delay, when compared to traditional right-handed and other left-handed structures. Based on a simulation study, a design methodology that helps the users to tune the group-delay of a given circuit is developed. Delay minimization of an RF power amplifier circuit is presented as a potential application. DOI: 1.229/PIERS6172312 1. INTRODUCTION Research on radio-frequency (RF) delay lines for high-speed/wide-band applications is becoming important in the context of modern electronic-warfare systems, satellite-communication systems, and signal-processing systems, in which memory storage of signals is a necessity [1 3]. Delay lines based on microstrip transmission lines show lower loss and wider band-width, but fail to achieve longer delay, owing to high wave-velocity of RF/microwave signals traveling through such lines. About thirty years ago, Veselago predicted that electromagnetic (EM) plane waves, in a medium with negative permittivity (ε) and negative permeability (µ), propagate in a direction opposite to that of the energy-flow [4]. Recent studies have shown that left-handed (LH) structures exhibit both negative and positive group-delays in the negative refractive index (NRI) region. Group-delay is related to group-velocity (v) and length of the microstrip line (L), or to frequency derivative of the transmission phase (ϕ), as τ = L v = ϕ ω. (1) In this paper, we present a composite right/left-handed (CRLH) delay line utilizing interdigital capacitors, which offers longer delay compared to traditional right-handed (RH) and other LH microstrip delay lines. The proposed structure is compact, and its group-delay can be tuned by adjusting physical parameters of the interdigital capacitors. Based on a simulation study, a design methodology has been developed to help users easily tune the group-delay of the line/structure. One of the useful characteristics of the proposed structure (i. e., relatively longer negative group-delay) is exploited for reducing group-delay in an electronic circuit. Via to ground D M T Via to ground Figure 1: CRLH structure [6] with D =. mm, T = mm, M =.2 mm, N = 8, and ε = 12.9. 2. PROPOSED CRLH DELAY LINE Any left-handed transmission line (LH-TL) is a CRLH structure [], i. e., LH at low-frequencies and RH at high-frequencies, and exhibits band-pass characteristics. The CRLH structure [6] is shown in Fig. 1. By adjusting the physical dimensions including length of outer arms (D), length
PIERS ONLINE, VOL. 3, NO. 3, 27 26 of fingers (T ), width of fingers (M), and number of fingers (N), any given group-delay specification can be achieved. Using Zeland s IE3D software tool, we performed EM simulations for different geometries as shown in Table 1. Results of the simulations are shown in Figs. 2(a) (c). A close inspection of these results in the 1.. GHz range has resulted in the following observations. Table 1: Different combinations of physical parameters for which EM data is collected. (M, T and D are in mm). 1 2 3 4 M.4.2.2.2.2.2 N 6 6 8 8 8 8 T 4. 4. 4. D 1. 1. 1. 1..9.49 6 S21 Magnitude (db) 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 sim1 sim2 sim3 sim4 sim sim6 4 1. 2 2. 3 3. 4 4.. S21 Phase (degrees) 2 1 1 1 1 2 1. 2 2. 3 3. 4 4.. sim1 sim2 sim3 sim4 sim sim6 Group Delay (ns) 1.8.6.4.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 Frequnecy (GHz) Figure 2: Comparison of (a) S 21 magnitude, (b) S 21 phase, and (c) group-delay for different geometries shown in Table 1. Case 1 (simulations 1 and 2): When M is decreased from.4 mm to.2 mm, group-delay decreases while both centre frequency and bandwidth increase considerably. It is to be noted that group-delay M. Case 2 (simulations 2 and 3): When M is kept constant and N is increased from 6 to 8, group-delay increases significantly. Once again, it is to be noted that group-delay N. Case 3 (simulations 3 and 4): When M and N are kept constant, and T is increased from 4. mm to mm, both group-delay and pass-band increase marginally. Case 4 (simulations 4 and ): When D is decreased from 1. mm to.9 mm, both magnitude and phase of S 21 change marginally. As such, D can be used to adjust/fine-tune impedance matching. Case (simulations and 6): Keeping all other design parameters constant, D alone is adjusted to.49 mm resulting in a perfect matching. This adjustment does not affect group-delay. 3. COMPARISON OF VARIOUS STRUCTURES Compared to traditional RH delay lines, the proposed CRLH delay line is relatively more compact, while offering a much longer group-delay as can be inferred from the sharper slope of ϕ(s 21 ) throughout the frequency range of interest (see Fig. 3(a)). Simulations using Zeland s MDSPICE software show that both negative and positive group-velocities can be achieved within the NRI band. As can be seen in Fig. 3(b), positive group-delay of the RH delay line is almost zero (.3 ns) over the entire frequency range, whereas that of the CRLH delay line is.9 ns ( 27 times longer). In the frequency ranges 2.2 2.4 GHz and 4.1 4.2 GHz, negative group-delay is observed to be 19.4 ns and 6. ns respectively for the proposed structure, both of which are longer than other LH structures, e. g., [7]. The time-domain response of the proposed structure in Fig. 3(c) shows that the output waveform leads the input waveform indicating a negative time-delay (approx.. ns). sim1 sim2 sim3 sim4 sim sim6
PIERS ONLINE, VOL. 3, NO. 3, 27 261 S21 Phase (degrees) 1 1 1 1 CRLH Structure RH Structure 1 1. 2 2. 3 3. 4 4. Group Delay (ns) 1 1 2 CRLH Structure RH Structure 2. 3 3. 4 4. Voltage (V).3.3.2.2.1.1.. 1 Time (ps) Input Output (a) (b) (c) Figure 3: Comparison of (a) S 21 phase and (b) group-delay for the CRLH and the traditional right-handed structures, and (c) schematic showing input/output voltage waveforms for the CRLH structure. 4. APPLICATION EXAMPLE In essence, the proposed CRLH structure provides the user with certain degrees of freedom (i. e., physical parameters) to achieve a given group-delay. In the design/optimization of high-speed/highfrequency circuits, controlling the group-delay of output waveforms is critical [8]. As an application of this work, we advocate cascading of the proposed CRLH delay line with a given electronic circuit, without considerably altering the circuit responses other than group-delay. As can be seen in the example that follows, the design methodology developed based on the simulation study becomes useful. Port 1 Port 2 Proposed CRLH Structure Power Amplifier Figure 4: Circuit schematic showing the proposed CRLH structure cascaded with the given power amplifier circuit. In this application example, a power amplifier (PA) circuit operating in the 1 4 GHz range is considered. As can be seen in Fig. (a) and Fig. (b), the gain of the amplifier is 14.3 db at the centre frequency 2.6 GHz, and its return loss is greater than 1 db in the 2.6 3. GHz range. Frequency-domain simulations of the PA circuit in Agilent s Advanced Design System (ADS) indicate a positive group-delay of.3.4 ns in the 2.2 3. GHz range (see Fig. (c)). The objective here is to reduce this delay using the proposed CRLH delay line. We start the process of investigating group-delay by studying the behavior of the CRLH structure exclusively in the 1 4 GHz range. Conceptually, the (modified) objective is to achieve a negative group-delay by tweaking its physical parameters. Initial values of the parameters are set to be M =.4 mm, N = 6, T = mm, and D = 1. mm. First, M is decreased to.1 mm in order to achieve
PIERS ONLINE, VOL. 3, NO. 3, 27 262 a wider pass-band, similar to that of the PA circuit. Second, N is increased to 8 so as to adjust the centre frequency of the CRLH structure to 2.7 GHz (which is closer to the center frequency of the PA), while maintaining an average group-delay of.6 ns in the 2.2 3. GHz range. Third, a fine-adjustment is performed by increasing T to.14 mm such that group-delay of the CRLH delay line increases to.4 ns and its centre frequency reaches 2.6 GHz. Finally, parameter D is adjusted to.73 mm in order to lower the return loss. As a result of this systematic/step-by-step design process, the optimized CRLH delay line is seen to have an insertion loss <.1 db in the 2.2 3. GHz range and a return loss > 2 db in the 2. 2.8 GHz range. To summarize, the most important result here is that the optimized CRLH delay line shows an average group-delay of.39 ns in the frequency range of interest. The optimized CRLH structure is cascaded with the PA circuit as shown in Fig. 4. Simulation results of the overall circuit in ADS are presented in Figs. 6(a) (c). A comparison of Figs. 6(a) (c) with Figs. (a) (c) shows that cascading the CRLH delay line has not affected the amplifier response considerably. For instance, gain of the overall circuit is greater than 13 db in the frequency range 2.4 2.9 GHz and its return loss is lower than 2 db at 3.1 GHz. The group-delay of the overall circuit is reduced to <.3 ps as can be seen in Fig. 6(c), and this reduction is significant considering the original group-delay of the given PA circuit. Figure : Power amplifier simulations showing (a) magnitude of S 21, (b) magnitude of S 11, and (c) groupdelay. Figure 6: Combined EM-circuit responses showing (a) magnitude of S 21, (b) magnitude of S 11, and (c) group-delay.. CONCLUSIONS In this paper, a new CRLH delay line has been presented. EM simulations of the proposed line indicate not only NRI, but also negative and positive group-delays much longer than traditional RH and LH structures. The CRLH delay line can be cascaded with a PA circuit to minimize its group-delay. It has been shown that such an approach does not alter/affect the original PA
PIERS ONLINE, VOL. 3, NO. 3, 27 263 circuit characteristics such as gain and return loss. Dispersive properties of LH materials make LH structures (e. g., the proposed delay line) suitable for efficiently controlling dispersive effects in electronic circuits and dispersion management in high-speed interconnects. This work can be useful for high-speed/wide-band system optimization. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors acknowledge useful discussions with Dr. R. Raut of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada. REFERENCES 1. Toughlian, E. N. and H. Zmuda, A photonic variable RF delay line for phased array antennas, J. Lightwave Tech., Vol. 8, 1824 1828, 199. 2. Tantawi, S. G., R. D. Ruth, A. E. Vlieks, and M. Zolotorev, Active high-power RF pulse compression using optically switched resonant delay lines, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Vol. 4, 1486 1492, 1997. 3. Su, H. T., Y. Wang, F. Huang, and F. Lancaster, Characterizing a double-spiraled meander superconducting microstrip delay line using a resonator technique, Proc. IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp., 13 138, Fort Worth, TX, June 24. 4. Veselago, V. G., The electrodynamics of substance with simultaneously negative values of ε and µ, Soviet Physics Uspekhi, Vol. 1, 9 14, 1968.. Caloz, C. and T. Itoh, Transmission line approach of left-handed (LH) materials and microstrip implementation of an artificial LH transmission line, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 2, 119 1166, 24. 6. Zhu, L., V. K. Devabhaktuni, and C. Wang, CAD of left-handed transmission line bandpass filters, Proc. Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symp., Accepted, Beijing, China, April 27. 7. Siddiqui, O., M. Mojahedi, and G. Eleftheriades, Periodically loaded transmission line with effective refractive index and negative group velocity, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 1, 2619 262, 23. 8. Kim, S., N. Gopal, and L. Pillage, Time-domain macromodels for VLSI interconnect analysis, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 13, 127 127, 1994.