Closed-loop MIMO performance with 8 Tx antennas

Similar documents
Proposal for Uplink MIMO Schemes in IEEE m

Physical Structure of UL Feedback Channels

Proposal for IEEE m Uplink Power Control

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Title Propose for Uplink Pilot Design in IEEE m

Proposal for Incorporating Single-carrier FDMA into m

Proposal for Constellation Re-arrangement in IR HARQ

Proposal for IEEE m Frame Structure for Single Band Operation

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16e-04/517 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Liaison Report from ARIB BWA Subcommittee

IEEE C802.16e-04/420. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

MU-MIMO with Fixed Beamforming for

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Comment on Unsolicited RNG-RSP in transparent RS System

Canadian Evaluation Group

Performance Studies on LTE Advanced in the Easy-C Project Andreas Weber, Alcatel Lucent Bell Labs

Effectiveness study on inter-system signaling/messaging

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Coverage/Capacity simulations for OFDMA PHY in with ITU-T channel model

Investigation on Multiple Antenna Transmission Techniques in Evolved UTRA. OFDM-Based Radio Access in Downlink. Features of Evolved UTRA and UTRAN

Unveiling Myths about SC-FDMA in TGm

Considerations on the Ranging Channels (AWD / )

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Per Stream Power Control in CQICH Enhanced Allocation IE

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Radio Interface and Radio Access Techniques for LTE-Advanced

PHY Proposal IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 8.2)

Analytical Evaluation of the Cell Spectral Efficiency of a Beamforming Enhanced IEEE m System

LTE-Advanced research in 3GPP

System Performance of Cooperative Massive MIMO Downlink 5G Cellular Systems

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

A Mixed OFDM Downlink and Single Carrier Uplink for the 2-11 GHz Licensed Bands

Zion Hadad Voice: RunCom Communitcations Ltd. Fax: Hachoma st. Rishon le-zion, Israel

Assignments of Pilots for 256 FFT OFDMA mode

WINNER+ IMT-Advanced Evaluation Group

IEEE Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access <

System-Level Performance of Downlink Non-orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) Under Various Environments

IEEE C802.16a-02/46. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Beamforming for 4.9G/5G Networks

802.11ax Design Challenges. Mani Krishnan Venkatachari

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Interpolation Effects For OFDM Preamble

Comments on IEEE j Path-loss Models in IEEE802.16j-06/013

IEEE C802.16a-02/94r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Massive MIMO a overview. Chandrasekaran CEWiT

5G New Radio Design. Fall VTC-2017, Panel September 25 th, Expanding the human possibilities of technology to make our lives better

IEEE C802.16e-04/515r3. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Relay Combining Hybrid ARQ for j

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Voice: Fax:

Spectral Mask and Field Trials of a COFDM Modem

IEEE abc-01/56r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE c-01/39. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

UCP simulation: Approach and Initial Results

Carrier Aggregation and MU-MIMO: outcomes from SAMURAI project

Cohere Technologies Performance evaluation of OTFS waveform in single user scenarios Agenda item: Document for: Discussion

IEEE C802.16e-04/518r1 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Extended IE format for concurrent transmission of bursts

3G/4G Mobile Communications Systems. Dr. Stefan Brück Qualcomm Corporate R&D Center Germany

IEEE C802.16d-04/40. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Analysis of RF requirements for Active Antenna System

Changes in ARQ IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 8.2)

Utilization of Channel Reciprocity in Advanced MIMO System

Project. Title. Submitted Sources: {se.park,

NR Physical Layer Design: NR MIMO

The Next Generation Broadband Wireless Communication Network 3GPP-LTE - (Advanced)

RF exposure impact on 5G rollout A technical overview

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Peer reviewed version. Link to published version (if available): /PIMRC.2009.

Application Note. StarMIMO. RX Diversity and MIMO OTA Test Range

IEEE c-23. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Coordinated Joint Transmission in WWAN

IEEE C /008. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Channel estimation issues for TDD and FDD OFDM

Next Generation Mobile Networks NGMN Liaison Statement to 5GAA

MIMO in 4G Wireless. Presenter: Iqbal Singh Josan, P.E., PMP Director & Consulting Engineer USPurtek LLC

Massive MIMO for the New Radio Overview and Performance

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Performance Evaluation of Uplink Closed Loop Power Control for LTE System

IEEE Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access <

AAS Maps Format for OFDM

LTE-Advanced and Release 10

3GPP TR V ( )

Simulating coexistence between y and h systems in the 3.65 GHz band Scenarios and assumptions

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Peer reviewed version

IEEE C /07. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Switched beam antennas in millimeter-wave band broadband wireless access networks

Comment Resolution related to 4x4 MIMO Practicality (CID 69)

Technical Aspects of LTE Part I: OFDM

Ten Things You Should Know About MIMO

DOWNLINK ADAPTIVE CLOSED LOOP MIMO RESEARCH FOR 2 ANTENNAS IN TD-LTE SYSTEM

Survey of Power Control Schemes for LTE Uplink E Tejaswi, Suresh B

5G - The multi antenna advantage. Bo Göransson, PhD Expert, Multi antenna systems Systems & Technology

LTE Aida Botonjić. Aida Botonjić Tieto 1

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Consolidation of Uncoordinated Coexistence Mechanisms

John Liebetreu and Randall Scwartz

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

MU-MIMO in LTE/LTE-A Performance Analysis. Rizwan GHAFFAR, Biljana BADIC

Enhancing Energy Efficiency in LTE with Antenna Muting

MIMO Systems and Applications

3G Evolution. Outline. Chapter: Multi-antenna configurations. Introduction. Introduction. Multi-antenna techniques. Multiple receiver antennas, SIMO

mm Wave Communications J Klutto Milleth CEWiT

Transcription:

Closed-loop MIMO performance with 8 Tx antennas Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/623 Date Submitted: 2008-07-14 Source: Jerry Pi, Jay Tsai Voice: +1-972-761-7944, +1-972-761-7424 Samsung Telecommunications America E-mail: <zpi, jtsai>@sta.samsung.com Bruno Clerckx, David Mazzarese E-mail: bruno.clerckx@samsung.com, d.mazzarese@samsung.com Samsung Electronics Venue: RE: Call for comments on DL MIMO SDD text (IEEE C80216m-08_657r2) Base Contribution: IEEE C802.16m-08/623 Purpose: Adoption of the proposed text for the 802.16m SDD. Notice: This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE 802.16 Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in the Source(s) field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16. Patent Policy: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures: <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6> and <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3>. Further information is located at <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html> and <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat >.

Background Antenna configurations in C80216m-DL_MIMO-08_008 2 2, 4 2, and 4 4 Support of 8Tx FFS IMT-Advanced peak rate requirement 100Mbps mobility 1Gbps nomadic The latest IMT-Advanced Evaluation Methodology (ITU-R WP 5D IMT.EVAL) proposes 8Tx antenna configuration LTE-Advanced is considering support of 8 4 and 8 8 antenna configuration

BS with 8Tx antennas (correlated deployment) Uniform linear array with ½λ spacing 3-bit DFT-based codebook for 3-sector cells

Multi-user beamforming (one layer per user) UE1 UE3 UE2 UE3 UE2 UE5 sub-frame 0 sub-band 0 sub-band 1 sub-band N-1 MU-MIMO is based on scheduling-directed beamfomring algorithm

Simulation configurations - macro cell Parameter Assumption Cellular Layout Inter-site distance Distance-dependent path loss Hexagonal grid, 19 cell sites, 3 sectors per site 500m L= 128.1 + 37.6log 10 (.R), R in kilometers Shadowing standard deviation Correlation distance of Shadowing Penetration Loss Antenna pattern 8 db 50 m 20dB = 70 degrees, A m = 20 db Carrier Frequency / Bandwidth Channel model 2GHz Spatial Channel Model (SCM) simulations UE speeds of interest Total BS TX power (Ptotal) 3km/h 46dBm - 10MHz carrier Users dropped uniformly in entire cell Minimum distance between UE and cell >= 35 meters

3-sector Antenna 120 90 15 60 10 150 5 30 180 0 210 330 240 270 300

SCM-Urban Macro- #of Beam Isolation=2 9 8 System Throughput (bps/hz) 7 6 5 4 3 2 Baseline-1x2 MUBF8x2-1Stream MUBF8x2-2Stream MUBF8x2-3Stream MUBF8x2-4Stream 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 # of UEs

SCM-Urban Macro- #of Beam Isolation=2 2 5% User Throughput (bps/hz) 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Baseline-1x2 MUBF8x2-1Stream MUBF8x2-2Stream MUBF8x2-3Stream MUBF8x2-4Stream 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 # of UEs

SU CL MIMO 8 Tx at the BS leverages the benefits of high rank transmissions (up to 4) with a much higher occurrence than with 4 Tx. The transmission format for rank 4 will be defined in 16m: we might as well exploit it properly on the DL.

Transmission bandwidth Centre frequency Subframe duration Subcarrier spacing Simulation Conditions - SU MIMO 20 MHz 2.5 GHz FFT size 1024 Number of occupied subcarriers 1008 Number of OFDM symbols per subframe 6 Number of subcarriers per Resource Unit 18 Spatial channel environment CQI feedback Uplink sounding Feedback load 0.6171 ms 10. 938 khz Modified PedB channel, 3 km.h, uncorrelated at MS - Uncorrelated case: 4 wavelengths spacing and 15 degree angular spread at the base - Correlated case: ½ wavelength spacing and 3 degree angular spread at the base - Dual polarized case: +/-45 V-H, ½ wavelength spacing and 3 degree angular spread at the base 6 subframes delay, error-free 18 db power difference between DL and UL Full feedback (for every resource unit), 10 users Downlink pilot overhead 2 Tx: 11.11%, 4 Tx: 22.22% Channel estimation MIMO detection method Modulation and coding HARQ Ideal Linear MMSE 10 MCS levels Chase Combining, non-adaptive, 8 subframes retransmission delay, maximum 4 retransmissions

16 x 107 CL SU MIMO 8x4 vs. 4x4 PedB uncorrelated, MCW 8x4 vs. 4x4 CL SU MIMO, PedB uncorrelated, MCW 14 12 Goodput [bits/s/hz] 10 8 6 8x4 DFT based CB (3bits) 4 4x4 16e (6bits) 4x4 16e (3bits) 4x4 DFT based CB (4bits) 2 0 5 10 15 20 SNR [db] (DFT_8x4-16e_4x4_3bits)/16e_4x4_3bits=16.6577 11.8568 7.9602 0.8347 7.6875

10 x 107 9 8 CL SU MIMO 8x4 vs. 4x4 PedB correlated, MCW 8x4 vs. 4x4 CL SU MIMO, PedB correlated, MCW 8x4 DFT based CB (3bits) 4x4 16e (6bits) 4x4 16e (3bits) 4x4 DFT based CB (4bits) Goodput [bits/s] 7 6 5 4 3 0 5 10 15 20 SNR [db] (DFT_8x4-16e_4x4_3bits)/16e_4x4_3bits=50.0323 6.2152 30.0978 49.9343 33.2179

Conclusion 8 4 antenna configuration significant increases average and cell-edge spectral efficiency Proposed SDD text In section 11.x.1.1. Antenna Configuration The BS employs a minimum of two transmit antennas. The MS employs a minimum of two receive antennas. The antenna configurations are (N T, N R ) = (2, 2), (4, 2), (4, 4), (8, 2), and (8, 4), where N T denotes the number of BS transmit antennas and N R denotes the number of MS receive antennas. In section 11.x.1.2. Codeword to Layer Mapping The number of spatial streams, M, for SU-MIMO is M min(n T,N R ), where M is no more than 4. MU-MIMO can have up to 2 streams with 2 Tx antennas, and up to 4 streams for 4 Tx and 8 Tx antennas.