Transferring wavefront measurements to ablation profiles. Michael Mrochen PhD Swiss Federal Institut of Technology, Zurich IROC Zurich

Similar documents
Limits of Higher Order Correction based on Spot Size, Ablation Depth, and Tracker Responsiveness

Surgical data reveals that Q-Factor is important for good surgical outcome

Corporate Perspective Alcon Unanswered Technical Challenges that Still Need to be Overcome

The Aberration Structure of the Keratoconic Eye

Customized Correction of Wavefront Aberrations in Abnormal Human Eyes by Using a Phase Plate and a Customized Contact Lens

SCHWIND AMARIS. We have redefined perfection for you

Optical Engineering 421/521 Sample Questions for Midterm 1

Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics. Geometrical Approximation. Lenses. Mirrors. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Aberrations.

Optical Components for Laser Applications. Günter Toesko - Laserseminar BLZ im Dezember

What is Wavefront Aberration? Custom Contact Lenses For Vision Improvement Are They Feasible In A Disposable World?

MEL 80 Excimer Laser. When you want to see better performance

10/25/2017. Financial Disclosures. Do your patients complain of? Are you frustrated by remake after remake? What is wavefront error (WFE)?

4th International Congress of Wavefront Sensing and Aberration-free Refractive Correction ADAPTIVE OPTICS FOR VISION: THE EYE S ADAPTATION TO ITS

Lecture 4: Geometrical Optics 2. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Rays. Wavefronts. Aberrations. Outline

Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics. Geometrical Approximation. Lenses. Mirrors. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Aberrations.

Subjective Image Quality Metrics from The Wave Aberration

Normal Wavefront Error as a Function of Age and Pupil Size

VATT Optical Performance During 98 Oct as Measured with an Interferometric Hartmann Wavefront Sensor

Corneal Asphericity and Retinal Image Quality: A Case Study and Simulations

PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE. Measurement of low-order aberrations with an autostigmatic microscope

MicroSpot FOCUSING OBJECTIVES

Ron Liu OPTI521-Introductory Optomechanical Engineering December 7, 2009

Overview of Commercially Available Femtosecond Lasers in Refractive Surgery

THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS Dual-Scheimpflug and Placido Reaching a new level in refractive screening

Computer Generated Holograms for Optical Testing

Rediscover quality of life thanks to vision correction with technology from Carl Zeiss. Patient Information

WaveMaster IOL. Fast and Accurate Intraocular Lens Tester

WaveMaster IOL. Fast and accurate intraocular lens tester

3.0 Alignment Equipment and Diagnostic Tools:

Design of Large Working Area F-Theta Lens. Gong Chen

OPTICAL SYSTEMS OBJECTIVES

OPAL. SpotOptics. AUTOMATED WAVEFRONT SENSOR Single and double pass O P A L

HOYA aspherical IOL with ABC (Aspheric Balanced Curve) Design

EE119 Introduction to Optical Engineering Fall 2009 Final Exam. Name:

Chapters 1 & 2. Definitions and applications Conceptual basis of photogrammetric processing

Corneal refrac+ve surgery: Are we trea+ng the wrong loca+on with the wrong correc+on?

Geometric optics & aberrations

Testing Aspheric Lenses: New Approaches

Tutorial Zemax 8: Correction II

SpotOptics. The software people for optics OPAL O P A L


Optical Connection, Inc. and Ophthonix, Inc.

Difrotec Product & Services. Ultra high accuracy interferometry & custom optical solutions

CREATING ROUND AND SQUARE FLATTOP LASER SPOTS IN MICROPROCESSING SYSTEMS WITH SCANNING OPTICS Paper M305

USE OF COMPUTER- GENERATED HOLOGRAMS IN OPTICAL TESTING


Wavefront-Guided Programmable Spectacles Related Metrics

Lens Design I. Lecture 5: Advanced handling I Herbert Gross. Summer term

Why is There a Black Dot when Defocus = 1λ?

Light has some interesting properties, many of which are used in medicine:

PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE. Automated asphere centration testing with AspheroCheck UP

Digital Wavefront Sensors Measure Aberrations in Eyes

Explanation of Aberration and Wavefront

OpenStax-CNX module: m Vision Correction * OpenStax

In recent years there has been an explosion of

Design of a Test Bench for Intraocular Lens Optical Characterization

Focus on performance. The SCHWIND AMARIS product family TREAT

Causes of refractive error post premium IOL s 3/17/2015. Instruction course: Refining the Refractive Error After Premium IOL s.

Principles and clinical applications of ray-tracing aberrometry (Part II)

CHARA Collaboration Review New York 2007 CHARA Telescope Alignment

Testing an off-axis parabola with a CGH and a spherical mirror as null lens

A new approach to the study of ocular chromatic aberrations

AgilOptics mirrors increase coupling efficiency into a 4 µm diameter fiber by 750%.

Pablo Artal. collaborators. Adaptive Optics for Vision: The Eye's Adaptation to its Point Spread Function

Vision Research at. Validation of a Novel Hartmann-Moiré Wavefront Sensor with Large Dynamic Range. Wavefront Science Congress, Feb.

Collimation Tester Instructions

ADVANCED OPTICS LAB -ECEN 5606

Nmark AGV-HPO. High Accuracy, Open Frame, Thermally Stable Galvo Scanner. Highest accuracy scanner available attains singledigit,

OPTINO. SpotOptics VERSATILE WAVEFRONT SENSOR O P T I N O

Sequential Ray Tracing. Lecture 2

Paper Synopsis. Xiaoyin Zhu Nov 5, 2012 OPTI 521


Understanding Optical Specifications

Conformal optical system design with a single fixed conic corrector

Solution of Exercises Lecture Optical design with Zemax Part 6

OPTI-201/202 Geometrical and Instrumental Optics Copyright 2018 John E. Greivenkamp. Section 16. The Eye

Nmark AGV-HP. High Accuracy, Thermally Stable Galvo Scanner

GEOMETRICAL OPTICS AND OPTICAL DESIGN

Focus on performance. The SCHWIND AMARIS product family TREAT

The optical analysis of the proposed Schmidt camera design.

Development of a new multi-wavelength confocal surface profilometer for in-situ automatic optical inspection (AOI)

Fabrication of 6.5 m f/1.25 Mirrors for the MMT and Magellan Telescopes

Refractive Power / Corneal Analyzer. OPD-Scan III

ECEN 4606, UNDERGRADUATE OPTICS LAB

Choices and Vision. Jeffrey Koziol M.D. Thursday, December 6, 12

Adaptive Optics for Vision Science. Principles, Practices, Design, and Applications

ADVANCED OPTICS LAB -ECEN Basic Skills Lab

Wave Front Topography. ReSeeVit Evolution Topography Module for Modi Topographer

Trust your eyes. Presbyopic treatment methods on the cornea. PresbyMAX Decision criteria and patient s acceptance

Laboratory experiment aberrations

Adaptive optics two-photon fluorescence microscopy

Optimized Profiles for Astigmatic Refractive Surgery

Author Contact Information: Erik Gross VISX Incorporated 3400 Central Expressway Santa Clara, CA, 95051

CHAPTER 33 ABERRATION CURVES IN LENS DESIGN

OCULUS Keratograph 4. Topographer. We focus on progress

Basics Of Retinal Image Quality

Optical System Design

Using molded chalcogenide glass technology to reduce cost in a compact wide-angle thermal imaging lens

ECEG105/ECEU646 Optics for Engineers Course Notes Part 4: Apertures, Aberrations Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio Northeastern University Fall 2008

What s New in Ocular Biomechanics?

Transcription:

Transferring wavefront measurements to ablation profiles Michael Mrochen PhD Swiss Federal Institut of Technology, Zurich IROC Zurich

corneal ablation Calculation laser spot positions Centration Calculation ablation profile Eye Tracking Wavefront sensing Performance Laser Centration during measurement photoablation Patient Eye Biological response wound healing

corneal ablation Calculation laser spot positions Centration Calculation ablation profile Eye Tracking Wavefront sensing Predictability of the refractive outcome Performance Laser Centration during measurement photoablation Patient Eye Biological response wound healing

corneal ablation Calculation laser spot positions Centration Calculation ablation profile Wavefront sensing Centration during measurement Accommodation Tear Film Refractive errors Pupil Size Opacity of media Age Eye Tracking Performance Laser photoablation Patient Eye Biological response wound healing

Patients expectations Is it save and predictablil? Correction for far or near distance monovision / presbyopia high expectations on visual performance Cost / service ratio

corneal ablation

corneal ablation

Preview!!!! See also: Mirko Jankov (Poster session) Can dry eye influence the wavefront measurement Takashi Fujikado (Sunday) Wavefront sensing and the tear film

corneal ablation Calculation laser spot positions Centration Calculation ablation profile Eye Tracking Wavefront sensing Fixation Target line of sight pupil size Performance Laser Centration during measurement photoablation Patient Eye Biological response wound healing

corneal ablation Calculation laser spot positions Centration Calculation ablation profile Wavefront sensing Centration during measurement Optical Setup System calibration Wavelength Zernike calculation Dynamic range of sensor Eye Tracking Performance Laser photoablation Patient Eye Biological response wound healing

Chromatic aberrations Φ = 1D F 486 nm d 588 nm C 656 nm Wavefront sensors usually work in the near infrared wave length > 750 nm

Preview!!!! See also: Larry Thibos (Hot Topics) Does Chromatic Aberration Hinder or Help?

Wavefront sensing ~ 96 spots over a 7 mm pupil ~ 1100 spots over a 7 mm pupil

corneal ablation Calculation laser spot positions Centration Calculation ablation profile Eye Tracking Wavefront sensing Centration during measurement Optical eye model K-Readings Topography of the cornea Biometric data of the eye Performance Laser photoablation Patient Eye Biological response wound healing

Ablation profiles Ablation profile Subjective Refraction Pupil size corneal curvature age female / mail patien expectations y 2 2 1 ( r) = R1 ( r r0 ) y 2 2 2 ( r) = R2 ( r r0 ) Optical zone radius r 0 2 ( r0 ), 0 r 0 ( n 1) D r a( r) = r 2 D = D before D after = ( n 1) 1 R 1 1 R 2

Ablation profiles. the corneal topography information specifying corneal shape has very little effect on the desired ablation depth for an optimal refraction. Stanley Klein, J Opt. Soc. Am A (1999)

Ablation profiles Wavefront guided treatments. the first surface of the cornea and internal optics partially compensate for each other's aberrations and produce an improved retinal image. it shows the limitation of corneal topography as a guide for new refractive procedures and provides a strong endorsement of the value of ocular wave-front sensing for those applications.. Pablo Artal, J. Vis. (2001)

Ablation profiles wavefront aberrations of the internal structures Corneal wavefront aberrations Total wavefront aberrations

Ablation profiles Converting wavefronts into corrections 1st - order approximation! Wavefront inversion 2 µm 2 µm 2 µm 2 µm Pupil diameter 6 mm Pupil diameter 6 mm Ablations profile shift vertical axis [mm] 10 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 10 horizontal axis [mm] 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0 ablation depth [µm] 12 µm 6 µm Pupil diameter 6 mm Ablations profil conversion 6 µm W ( x, y) a( x, y) = n = 1.337 n 1 6 µm Pupil diameter 6 mm

Ablation profiles Total wavefront Wavefront of higher orders Pre-OP Post-OP 6 months vertical axis [mm] vertical axis [mm] Ablation profile used! 10 8 6 4 2 10 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 10 horizontal axis [mm] 2 4 6 8 10 horizontal axis [mm] 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0 ablation depth [µm] classical ablation profile ablation depth [µm]

Ablation profiles a ray that is less bent when it enters the eye is expected to intersect the lens much further away form the axis. the spherical aberration is expected to be much higher in the operated eye. Fabrice Manns, SPIE Ophthalmic Technologies XI (2001)

Ablation profiles f 1

Ablation profiles f f 1 2 2 f

Ablation profiles because of individual interactions of the aberrations in the ocular components, a combination of corneal and total aberration measurements is critical to understand the individual outcomes, and by extension, to designing customized ablation algorithms. Susana Marcos, IOVS (2001)

Preview!!!! See also: Susana Marcos (Sunday) From theoretical laser ablation profile design ro real outcomes: implications for optimized corneal refractive correction Steve Burns (Hot topics) What s better than a perfect optical correction?

corneal ablation Calculation laser spot positions Centration Calculation ablation profile Eye Tracking Wavefront sensing Centration during measurement Overlapping of spots assumed ablation depth per pulse corneal shape factors thermal heating Performance Laser photoablation Patient Eye Biological response wound healing

Ablation depth [µm] Principles of of laser-tissue interaction 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Tissue removal Threshold process Ablation threshold @ 193 nm 50-60 mj/cm 2 0.0 10 100 1000 Radiant exposure [mj/cm²) Planned ablation profile Ablation threshold ~ 50 mj/cm 2 Central ablation depth of a single laser spot ~ 0.5 microns Ablation diameter of a single spot 0.5-1.0 mm Ablation diameter of a single spot 0.5-1.0 mm

corneal ablation Treatment zone Optical zone Spot overlapping Laser pulses

corneal ablation Small laser beam Pulse ablation profile Large laser beam Pulse ablation profile Achieved profile Attempted profile on the cornea Achieved profile

Example Coma-like Aberration Ablation depth 0.5µm 0.25µm 0.125µm C7 = 0.5µm Pulse diameter 1.5mm 1.0mm 0.5mm

Example Example 6th 6th order order astigmatism astigmatism 1.5mm Pulse diameter 1.0mm C23 = 0.25µm 0.5mm 0.5µm Ablation depth 0.25µm 0.125µm

Treatment time!! Reducing the spot diameter by a factor of 2 results in an increase of the treatment time by a factor of 4. treatment time ~ ( spot diameter 2 )

corneal ablation Calculation laser spot positions Centration Calculation ablation profile Eye Tracking Wavefront sensing Centration during measurement Fixation Target line of sight pupil size rough corneal surface Performance Laser photoablation Patient Eye Biological response wound healing

Centration Difficulty 2 Centration: A task with 6 degrees of freedom Horizontal shifts Vertical shifts Rotation around longitudinal axis (cyclotorsion) Rotation around horizontal axis Rotation around vertical axis Z - distance The coordinate systems used in the measurement (M) and the treatment (T) have to coincide exactly!

Centration 2 Types of centration errors: Systematic centration errors causing constant decentration Random (dynamic) centration errors causing the ablation to be smeared

Centration Systematic centration errors avoid with precise alignment techniques Random (dynamic) centration errors avoid with active eye tracking

Centration Required Accuracy Treat 95% of normal eyes to: Diffraction limit 10 th percentile of rms of normal eyes Same image quality Torsional 3 mm 3 deg 6 deg 29 deg alignment 7 mm 1 deg 4 deg 21 deg Lateral 3 mm 0.21 mm 0.41 mm 0.85 mm centration 7 mm 0.07 mm 0.22 mm 0.62 mm

corneal ablation Calculation laser spot positions Centration Calculation ablation profile Eye Tracking Wavefront sensing Centration during measurement Sapling rate / Latency Resolution Pupil Size Paraxial errors of entrance pupil Performance Laser photoablation Patient Eye Biological response wound healing

Eye - tracking The eye moves during treatment

Eye - tracking How does latency cause positioning errors? Latency Image Acquisition Image Transfer Image Processing Position Control Ablation image Eye Tracker x/y Scanner Device beamsplitter α/β Camer a Scanner mirror ablation beam Laser infrared illumination Eye

Eye - tracking Image Acquisition Image Transfer Image Processing Position Control Ablation Eye Tracker Scanner Device Camera Laser

Eye - tracking Image Acquisition Image Transfer Image Processing Position Control Ablation image Eye Tracker Scanner Device Camera Laser

Eye - tracking Image Acquisition Image Transfer Image Processing Position Control Ablation image Eye Tracker x/y Scanner Device Camera Laser

Eye - tracking Image Acquisition Image Transfer Image Processing Position Control Ablation image Eye Tracker x/y Scanner Device α/β Camera Laser

Eye - tracking Image Acquisition Image Transfer Image Processing Position Control Ablation image Eye Tracker x/y Scanner Device α/β Camera Laser

Eye - tracking Eye motion Positioning Error Latency Eye Motion during Latency => Positioning Error

Eye - tracking Vertical deviation [µm] 400 Vertical deviation [µm] 400 0 ms latency 4 ms latency 200 200 0 0-200 -200-400 -400-200 0 200 400 Horizontal deviation [µm] Vertical deviation [µm] 400 200 8 ms latency -400-400 -200 0 200 400 Horizontal deviation [µm] Vertical deviation [µm] 400 200 No tracking Positioning errors increase with increasing latency 0 0-200 -200-400 -400-200 0 200 400 Horizontal deviation [µm] SMI -400-400 -200 0 200 400 Horizontal deviation [µm]

Preview!!!! More detailed information on the assumptions, stability, and outcomes of different scanning - spot laser parameters such as ablation depth, spot diameter, and eye-tracking latency treatments are presented tomorrow by Michael Bueeler

corneal ablation Calculation laser spot positions Centration Calculation ablation profile Eye Tracking Wavefront sensing Centration during measurement Energy stability Beam profile Scanning technology Wavelength Performance Laser photoablation Patient Eye Biological response wound healing

Excimer laser corneal ablation Beam profiling / shaping Beam delivery Imaging / focusing optics

corneal ablation

corneal ablation Calculation laser spot positions Centration Calculation ablation profile Eye Tracking Wavefront sensing Centration during measurement Tissue absorption Laser pulse duration Tissue properties Biomechanical properties of tissue Performance Laser photoablation Patient Eye Biological response wound healing

Principles of of laser-tissue interaction Dissoziation and vaporisation Vaporisation Ft h F0 Dissoziation da b l - α z ~e Tissue z

Principles of of laser-tissue interaction Radiant exposure (fluence) Absorption Breaking of molecular bonds Increase of temperature Breaking of hydrogen bonds Dissociation and vaporization Tissue removal Stress waves Ablation plume dynamics

Ablation depth [µm] Principles of of laser-tissue interaction 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Tissue removal Threshold process Ablation threshold @ 193 nm 50-60 mj/cm 2 0.0 10 100 1000 Radiant exposure [mj/cm²)

Spot cross-section The illumination problem

The illumination problem 1.00 Fluence losses z α 0.95 Ae ff y kor(r) 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.75 F = 150mJ/cm²; R = 6.5 mm F = 150mJ/cm²; R = 7.0 mm F = 150mJ/cm²; R = 7.8 mm F = 150mJ/cm²; R = 8.3 mm r x 0.70 0 1 2 3 4 5 radius r[mm]

corneal ablation Calculation laser spot positions Centration Calculation ablation profile Eye Tracking Wavefront sensing Centration during measurement Epithelium smoothing Flap / Hinge Biomechanical changes DLK Performance Laser photoablation Patient Eye Biological response wound healing

Biomechanical effect IOP

Biomechanical effect IOP

Biomechanical effect IOP

Biomechanical effect myopic shift! IOP

Biomechanical effect Do we have a method for stiffening the cornea?

Biomechanical effect Cross-linking by UV - light and riboflavin is able to increase Young s module of the cornea by a factor of 5

SUMMARY Transfering wavefronts onto the cornea includes complex physical, optical, and biological assumtions that are not fully understood or studied

corneal ablation Calculation laser spot positions Centration Calculation ablation profile Eye Tracking Wavefront sensing Further research is required to increase Performance Laser Centration during measurement photoablation Patient Eye Biological response wound healing

corneal ablation Calculation laser spot positions Centration Calculation ablation profile Eye Tracking Wavefront sensing Centration during measurement the predictability of the refractive outcomes Performance Laser photoablation Patient Eye Biological response wound healing