DoD Modeling and Simulation Support to Acquisition

Similar documents
A Case Study to Examine Technical Data Relationships to the System Model Concept

R&M: Critical to Success in a Technology Reliant World

DoDI and WSARA* Impacts on Early Systems Engineering

DoD Engineering and Better Buying Power 3.0

Digital Engineering and Engineered Resilient Systems (ERS)

OSD Engineering Enterprise: Digital Engineering Initiatives

WSARA Impacts on Early Acquisition

Digital Engineering (DE) and Computational Research and Engineering Acquisition Tools and Environments (CREATE)

Panel: Systems Engineering Considerations in Practicing Test & Evaluation A Perspective from DoD

Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) Chapter 4 Systems Engineering Update: Overview Briefing

An Element of Digital Engineering Practice in Systems Acquisition

Digital Engineering. Phoenix Integration Conference Ms. Philomena Zimmerman. Deputy Director, Engineering Tools and Environments.

Models, Simulations, and Digital Engineering in Systems Engineering Restructure (Defense Acquisition University CLE011)

Synopsis and Impact of DoDI

Closing the Knowledge-Deficit in the Defense Acquisition System: A Case Study

Our Acquisition Challenges Moving Forward

Program Success Through SE Discipline in Technology Maturity. Mr. Chris DiPetto Deputy Director Developmental Test & Evaluation October 24, 2006

Digital Engineering. Ms. Philomena Zimmerman. Deputy Director, Engineering Tools and Environments OUSD(R&E)/Systems Engineering

Advancing the Use of the Digital System Model Taxonomy

Open Systems Architecture in DoD Acquisition: Opportunities and Challenges

Digital Engineering Support to Mission Engineering

DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE SELF-ASSESSMENT. Outcomes and Enablers

Engineered Resilient Systems DoD Science and Technology Priority

Prototyping: Accelerating the Adoption of Transformative Capabilities

Michael Gaydar Deputy Director Air Platforms, Systems Engineering

Technology Transition Assessment in an Acquisition Risk Management Context

A Systems Engineering Perspective on Innovation

Jerome Tzau TARDEC System Engineering Group. UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release. 14 th Annual NDIA SE Conf Oct 2011

A New Way to Start Acquisition Programs

Technology & Manufacturing Readiness RMS

The Drive for Innovation in Systems Engineering

Reducing Manufacturing Risk Manufacturing Readiness Levels

Test & Evaluation Strategy for Technology Development Phase

Engineered Resilient Systems NDIA Systems Engineering Conference October 29, 2014

RAPID FIELDING A Path for Emerging Concept and Capability Prototyping

Engineering Autonomy

Challenges and Innovations in Digital Systems Engineering

Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Business Case Considerations An Enabler of Risk Reduction

Manufacturing Readiness Assessment (MRA) Deskbook

Dr. Cynthia Dion-Schwartz Acting Associate Director, SW and Embedded Systems, Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E)

Software-Intensive Systems Producibility

AAC/XR: Shaping Tomorrow

Manufacturing Readiness Level Deskbook

Challenges and Opportunities in the Changing Science & Technology Landscape

The Role of the Communities of Interest (COIs) March 25, Dr. John Stubstad Director, Space & Sensor Systems, OASD (Research & Engineering)

USAF Digital Thread Initiative Overview

Critical Role of Software Engineering in Development Planning and Sustainment

Analysis of Alternatives (AoAs) from a Cost Estimating Perspective

A Knowledge-Centric Approach for Complex Systems. Chris R. Powell 1/29/2015

INTRODUCTION TO JOINT CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS (JCTD) 11 JULY 2018

Fifteenth Annual INCOSE Region II Mini-Conference. 30 October 2010 San Diego

A Review Of Technical Performance and Technology Maturity Approaches for Improved Developmental Test and Evaluation Assessment

Strategic Guidance. Quest for agility, innovation, and affordability. Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release

Manufacturing Readiness Assessments of Technology Development Projects

Final Report of the Subcommittee on the Identification of Modeling and Simulation Capabilities by Acquisition Life Cycle Phase (IMSCALCP)

Defense Innovation Day Unmanned Systems

The Role of CREATE TM -AV in Realization of the Digital Thread

AIR FORCE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT CENTER

An Assessment of Acquisition Outcomes and Potential Impact of Legislative and Policy Changes

Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook Version 2016

DIGITAL ENGINEERING STRATEGY

Four Conference Breakout Sessions

An Industry Response to the Acquisition Changes

Administrative Change to AFRLI , Science and Technology (S&T) Systems Engineering (SE) and Technical Management

Air Force Research Laboratory

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Acquisition Reform Initiative #3: Improving the Integration and Synchronization of Science and Technology)

DoD Research and Engineering

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT IN DOD ACQUISITION

Department of Defense Independent Research & Development (IR&D) and the Defense Innovation Marketplace

Are Rapid Fielding and Good Systems Engineering Mutually Exclusive?

The New DoD Systems Acquisition Process

Manufacturing Readiness Assessment Overview

DoD Joint Federated Assurance Center (JFAC) Industry Outreach

Breakthroughs in Applying Systems Engineering to Technology Development

2 August 2017 Prof Jeff Craver So you are Conducting a Technology Readiness Assessment? What to Know

Stevens Institute of Technology & Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC)

Using MIL-STD-882D w/change 1 For Hazardous Materials Management

Policy Perspective: The Current and Proposed Security Framework

Lesson 17: Science and Technology in the Acquisition Process

Technology Program Management Model (TPMM) Overview

Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs) Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs) In an S&T Environment

Systems Engineering Overview. Axel Claudio Alex Gonzalez

TRLs and MRLs: Supporting NextFlex PC 2.0

DoD Research and Engineering Enterprise

An Architecture-Centric Approach for Acquiring Software-Reliant Systems

TECHNICAL RISK ASSESSMENT: INCREASING THE VALUE OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS ASSESSMENT (TRA)

Smart Grid Maturity Model: A Vision for the Future of Smart Grid

Autonomy Test & Evaluation Verification & Validation (ATEVV) Challenge Area

Moving from R&D to Manufacture

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

TECHNICAL REPORT NO. TR

Module 1 - Lesson 102 RDT&E Activities

Rapid Fielding A Path for Emerging Concept and Capability Prototyping

Systems Engineering for Military Ground Vehicle Systems

DRAFT. February 2007 DRAFT. Prepared by the Joint Defense Manufacturing Technology Panel Manufacturing Readiness Level Working Group

Achieving the Systems Engineering Vision 2025

DoD Research and Engineering Enterprise

System of Systems Software Assurance

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL THESIS

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Shopping List Item No. 127 Page 1 of 1

Transcription:

DoD Modeling and Simulation Support to Acquisition Ms. Philomena Phil Zimmerman ODASD(SE)/System Analysis NDIA Modeling & Simulation Committee February 21, 2013 2013/02/21 Page-1

Agenda Modeling and Simulation within ODASD(SE) Modeling and Simulation Observations Modeling and Simulation Fundamentals System Modeling and DoD Acquisition Engineered Resilient Systems 2013/02/21 Page-2

DASD, Systems Engineering Mission Systems Engineering focuses on engineering excellence the creative application of scientific principles: To design, develop, construct and operate complex systems To forecast their behavior under specific operating conditions To deliver their intended function while addressing economic efficiency, environmental stewardship and safety of life and property. DASD(SE) Mission: Develop and grow the Systems Engineering capability of the Department of Defense through engineering policy, continuous engagement with component Systems Engineering organizations and through substantive technical engagement throughout the acquisition life cycle with major and selected acquisition programs. A Robust Systems Engineering Capability Across the Department Requires Attention to Policy, People and Practice US Department of Defense is the World s Largest Engineering Organization Over 99,000 Uniformed and Civilian Engineers Over 39,000 Acquisition Corps Certified Systems Engineers (SPRDE) 2013/02/21 Page-3

DASD, Systems Engineering DASD, Systems Engineering Stephen Welby Principal Deputy Kristen Baldwin Systems Analysis Kristen Baldwin (Acting) Addressing Emerging Challenges on on the the Frontiers of of Systems Engineering Major Program Support James Thompson Supporting USD(AT&L) Decisions with Independent Engineering Expertise Mission Assurance Nicholas Torelli Leading Systems Engineering Practice in DoD and Industry Analysis of of Complex Systems/Systems of of Systems Program Protection/Acquisition Cyber Security University and Industry Engineering Research Modeling and Simulation Systems Engineering FFRDC Oversight Engineering Assessment / Mentoring of Major Defense Programs Program Support Reviews OIPT / DAB / ITAB Support Systems Engineering Plans Systemic Root Cause Analysis Systems Engineering Policy & Guidance Development Planning/Early SE Specialty Engineering (System Safety, Reliability and Maintainability Engineering, Quality, Manufacturing, Producibility, Human Systems Integration (HSI)) Technical Workforce Development Standardization Providing technical support and systems engineering leadership and oversight to USD(AT&L) in support of planned and ongoing acquisition programs 2013/02/21 Page-4

Observations: Call for Action Modeling and Simulation is not consistently applied in the acquisition lifecycle It is not consistently recognized as a component or enabler of Systems Engineering It is not consistently productive for the program management team It is inconsistently applied in phases of the acquisition lifecycle They are never used as a continuum of tools, or as a supplier of rationale and justification for analysis, evaluations, and assessments across the acquisition lifecycle It is not consistently represented in Service and component organizations It is not, as a community, organized to answer questions, fill SE gaps, or share best practices Modeling and simulation has a long-standing strategy, but it does not have a current roadmap for improvement in application Acquisition modeling and simulation needs, capabilities, messages from PEO, PM not reaching OSD; and vice versa Contemporary challenge: Mr. Kendall s remarks at CSIS, 6 Feb 2012 2013/02/21 Page-5

MS&A Fundamentals Purpose: One page that conveys a high-level, concise, and comprehensive set of truths for Mod/Sim usage in Systems Engineering support to programs Key Areas Emphasized: Program Systems Engineer is responsible for Mod/Sim planning and coordination Mod/Sim is included in key schedule and programmatic plans SE uses models to define, understand, and communicate technical artifacts Models are continually updated throughout program life-cycle Project success is dependent on appropriate Mod/Sim training of team http://www.acq.osd.mil/se/docs/se-msa-fundamentals.pdf 2013/02/21 Page-6

Using the Modeling and Simulation Fundamentals DoDD 5000.1 Defense Acquisition System Operation Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) Systems Engineering Plan, etc. The M&S Fundamentals support the consideration of modeling and simulation as a tool for systems engineers to use in support to Acquisition activities M&S Fundamentals Service/Agency Specific Mod/Sim Guidance Modeling and Simulation Support Documentation (MSMP, SSP, ETC) The Fundamentals connect the M&S community to the acquisition use of M&S The Fundamentals suggest how M&S should be incorporated into the SE position on the program, but do not dictate how The Fundamentals assist both OSD and the programs maintain a common understanding of M&S use for acquisition program support Acquisition Program Support The M&S Fundamentals provide the modeling and simulation basis of support for programs, posturing modeling and simulation as a part of systems engineering, not separate from it. 2013/02/21 Page-7

AMSWG in 2012 Cost Modeling MORS Affordability Workshop Service Mod/Sim in Acquisition and SE Services and System Engineering Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) Chapter 4 (Systems Engineering) Defense Acquisition University (DAU) Activities within Lifecycle Supported by Mod/Sim Materiel Solutions Analysis NDIA Interim Results Manufacturing The Case for Model-based x System Model Development 2013/02/21 Page-8

Systems Modeling Use in Acquisition A 10,000 Ft View of the Practice The use of models and the insights gained from their use, aid in the conceptualization, resource estimation, design, deployment and sustainment of systems It is not limited to engineering; it enables engineering rigor across all acquisition functions The tools and processes for systems modeling use enable acquisition functions to be more efficient Modeling refers to a wide range of artifacts, to include physical and computer based Application of models supports reduction of program uncertainties, at any point in time, in cost, schedule, and performance The concept is still maturing In far more use that often recognized Has proven to be powerful when used Is not perfected, and requires intelligent use Adoption has been uneven across DoD to date Model-based acquisition does not diminish the importance of simulations; it increases the relevance of simulation output through consistent use of complete models. 2013/02/21 Page-9

Acquisition Life Cycle Framework Weapon System Development Enabling S&T Pre acquisition Concepts, Experimentation and Prototyping ICD MDD A B Materiel Solution Analysis AOA Pre EMD Review Technology Development SE Tradeoff Analyses Pre EMD CDD Engineering and Manufacturing Development CPD C Production and Deployment FRP DR IOC FOC Operations and Support Disposal PDR CDR TDS AS TRA AS AS SEP SEP SEP TEMP TEMP TEMP TEMP PPP PPP PPP PPP LCSP LCSP LCSP LCSP = Additional documentation requirements, may be approved below MDA Post PDR Assessment Post CDR Assessment 2013/02/21 Page-10

Systems Representation and Modeling Physical, logical structure, behavior, interactions, interoperability Data-driven Tradespace Exploration and Analysis Multi-dimensional generation/evaluation of alternative designs Why? Engineered Resilient Systems Key Technical Areas Cross-Domain Coupling Model interchange & composition across scales, disciplines Characterizing Changing Operational Contexts Deep understanding of warfighter needs, impacts of alternative designs Collaborative Design and Decision Support Enabling well-informed, low-overhead discussion, analysis, and assessment among engineers and decision-makers 2013/02/21 Page-11

Summary The Modeling & Simulation Fundamentals are one of the Keystones (NOT POLICY) of consistent modeling and simulation support to programs Established by the Acquisition Modeling and Simulation Working Group as a simple way to bridge the M&S community with the acquisition community. Prove the best practices (real and expected) before applying the System Model Discover/Identify best practices based on examples from the Services/Agencies Develop definition, build business case by studying elements in existence today Develop the System Model from elements and artifacts of acquisition activities which already exist Do not invent anything new; instead, use aim points from that which already exists Population of the system model should not require separate contract clauses 2013/02/21 Page-12

Questions? Phil Zimmerman Dep Dir, Modeling, Simulation, and Analysis ODASD(SE)/SA Philomena.zimmerman@osd.mil 2013/02/21 Page-13