BUREAU INTERNATIONAL DES POIDS ET MESURES. Final report

Similar documents
REPORT. EUROMET project no EUROMET.EM-S18 supplementary comparison of 1Ω and 10 kω resistance standards. P.O.Hetland, T. Sørsdal (JV, pilot 1 Ω)

Uncertainty in measurements of power and energy on power networks

CCEM KEY COMPARISON CCEM.RF-K1d.W (GT-RF/97-3) Measurement Techniques and Results of an Intercomparison. for RF Power in R 900

NATIONAL RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY Green Bank, West Virginia SPECTRAL PROCESSOR MEMO NO. 25. MEMORANDUM February 13, 1985

Uncertainty Management in the Measurements Performed by means of Virtual Instruments

Guidelines for CCPR and RMO Bilateral Key Comparisons CCPR Working Group on Key Comparison CCPR-G5 October 10 th, 2014

PC-BASED MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: CHARACTERISATION

A New Approach towards Solving the Location Discovery Problem in Wireless Sensor Networks

Modeling of Swivel Joint in two Dimensional Beams Framework

To: Professor Avitabile Date: February 4, 2003 From: Mechanical Student Subject: Experiment #1 Numerical Methods Using Excel

Passive Filters. References: Barbow (pp ), Hayes & Horowitz (pp 32-60), Rizzoni (Chap. 6)

MTBF PREDICTION REPORT

Sensors for Motion and Position Measurement

Determination of Ultrasonic Parameters Based on Attenuation and Dispersion Measurements

Control Chart. Control Chart - history. Process in control. Developed in 1920 s. By Dr. Walter A. Shewhart

THE IMPACT OF A WIDEBAND CHANNEL ON UWB SYSTEM DESIGN

Walsh Function Based Synthesis Method of PWM Pattern for Full-Bridge Inverter

A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO STATE FEEDBACK CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR DC/DC LINE-SIDE TRACTION CONVERTERS

Evaluate the Effective of Annular Aperture on the OTF for Fractal Optical Modulator

Application of Intelligent Voltage Control System to Korean Power Systems

antenna antenna (4.139)

A Doppler Smoothing Filter using Carrier Phase and Application to RTK

MASTER TIMING AND TOF MODULE-

Figure 1. DC-DC Boost Converter

Impact of Interference Model on Capacity in CDMA Cellular Networks. Robert Akl, D.Sc. Asad Parvez University of North Texas

Calculation of the received voltage due to the radiation from multiple co-frequency sources

29. Network Functions for Circuits Containing Op Amps

IEE Electronics Letters, vol 34, no 17, August 1998, pp ESTIMATING STARTING POINT OF CONDUCTION OF CMOS GATES

Graph Method for Solving Switched Capacitors Circuits

Effect of Pulse Shaping on BER Performance of QAM Modulated OFDM Signal

N- and P-Channel 2.5-V (G-S) MOSFET

RC Filters TEP Related Topics Principle Equipment

Swiss Rectifier Output Voltage Control with Inner Loop Power Flow Programming (PFP)

Dynamic Optimization. Assignment 1. Sasanka Nagavalli January 29, 2013 Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS OF MEASURING SYSTEM FOR INSTANTANEOUS POWER RESEARCH

4.3- Modeling the Diode Forward Characteristic

Radar Cross Section of Modified Target using Gaussian Beam Methods: Experimental Validation

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION 2. I-V CURVE MEASUREMENTS. Rodrigo Moretón, Eduardo Lorenzo and Javier Muñoz

INFLUENCE OF AN ADVANCE CONTROL OF PHOTOVOLTAIC GENERATION SYSTEM ON FAULT RIDE THROUGH PERFORMANCE

AN ALTERNATE CUT-OFF FREQUENCY FOR THE RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD OF SEISMIC ANALYSIS

International Conference on Space Optics ICSO 2014 La Caleta, Tenerife, Canary Islands 7 10 October /cso _2014 ono ' r

Fiber length of pulp and paper by automated optical analyzer using polarized light (Five-year review of T 271 om-12) (no changes since Draft 1)

Shunt Active Filters (SAF)

Learning Ensembles of Convolutional Neural Networks

@IJMTER-2015, All rights Reserved 383

Keywords: Speed binning, delay measurement hardware, process variation.

Network Theory. EC / EE / IN. for

Triferential Subtraction in Strain Gage Signal Conditioning. Introduction

Figure 1. DC-DC Boost Converter

Webinar Series TMIP VISION

A GBAS Testbed to Support New Monitoring Algorithms Development for CAT III Precision Approach

GLONASS Double Difference Ambiguity Resolution in Real-Time

DETERMINATION OF WIND SPEED PROFILE PARAMETERS IN THE SURFACE LAYER USING A MINI-SODAR

Digital Transmission

Networks. Backpropagation. Backpropagation. Introduction to. Backpropagation Network training. Backpropagation Learning Details 1.04.

Beam quality measurements with Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor and M2-sensor: comparison of two methods

ITU-T O.172. Amendment 1 (06/2008)

Analysis of Time Delays in Synchronous and. Asynchronous Control Loops. Bj rn Wittenmark, Ben Bastian, and Johan Nilsson

Microelectronic Circuits

Figure.1. Basic model of an impedance source converter JCHPS Special Issue 12: August Page 13

1 GSW Multipath Channel Models

Techniques for Graceful Reversion from Dual to Single Frequency WAAS

A Current Differential Line Protection Using a Synchronous Reference Frame Approach

POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY Electrical Engineering Department. EE SOPHOMORE LABORATORY Experiment 1 Laboratory Energy Sources

Control strategies for active power filters

TECHNICAL NOTE TERMINATION FOR POINT- TO-POINT SYSTEMS TN TERMINATON FOR POINT-TO-POINT SYSTEMS. Zo = L C. ω - angular frequency = 2πf

IIR Filters Using Stochastic Arithmetic

AC-DC CONVERTER FIRING ERROR DETECTION

A High-Sensitivity Oversampling Digital Signal Detection Technique for CMOS Image Sensors Using Non-destructive Intermediate High-Speed Readout Mode

aperture David Makovoz, 30/01/2006 Version 1.0 Table of Contents

Block-wise Extraction of Rent s Exponents for an Extensible Processor

PRACTICAL, COMPUTATION EFFICIENT HIGH-ORDER NEURAL NETWORK FOR ROTATION AND SHIFT INVARIANT PATTERN RECOGNITION. Evgeny Artyomov and Orly Yadid-Pecht

Network Reconfiguration in Distribution Systems Using a Modified TS Algorithm

Fine Time Aiding in Unsynchronised Cellular Systems: the Benefits for GPS Integration in Mobile Phones

Frequency Synchronization Analysis in Digital lock-in Methods for Bio-impedance Determination

A Simple Satellite Exclusion Algorithm for Advanced RAIM

Benchmark for PID control based on the Boiler Control Problem

Range-Based Localization in Wireless Networks Using Density-Based Outlier Detection

Biases in Earth radiation budget observations 2. Consistent scene identification and anisotropic factors

Network Application Engineering Laboratories Ltd., Japan

Comparison of Two Measurement Devices I. Fundamental Ideas.

Total Power Minimization in Glitch-Free CMOS Circuits Considering Process Variation

XII International PhD Workshop OWD 2010, October Modeling And Analysis Of Buck-Boost DC/DC Pulse Converter

High Speed ADC Sampling Transients

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology.

Total Power Minimization in Glitch-Free CMOS Circuits Considering Process Variation

Boise State University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 212L Circuit Analysis and Design Lab

Review: Our Approach 2. CSC310 Information Theory

Rejection of PSK Interference in DS-SS/PSK System Using Adaptive Transversal Filter with Conditional Response Recalculation

Efficient Large Integers Arithmetic by Adopting Squaring and Complement Recoding Techniques

N( E) ( ) That is, if the outcomes in sample space S are equally likely, then ( )

Generalized Incomplete Trojan-Type Designs with Unequal Cell Sizes

White Paper. OptiRamp Model-Based Multivariable Predictive Control. Advanced Methodology for Intelligent Control Actions

Cod and climate: effect of the North Atlantic Oscillation on recruitment in the North Atlantic

New Approach to Achieving Stand Alone GPS Attitude Determination using Dual Short Baselines for Small-Satellite

HIGH ACCURACY FILTER TRANSMISSION MEASUREMENT FOR DETERMINATION OF THE DETECTION EFFICIENCY CALIBRATION OF Si-SPAD DETECTORS

Strain Gauge Measuring Amplifier BA 660

Instruction Sheet AMPMODU* MTE CONNECTORS Mar 11 Rev A

ATBD for EUMETSAT Pre- Operational GSICS Inter-Calibration of Meteosat-IASI

Understanding the Spike Algorithm

Transcription:

BUREAU INTERNATIONAL DES POIDS ET MESURES Blateral Comparson of Ω standards (ongong BIPM key comparson BIPM.EM-K.a) between the NIST (USA) and the BIPM. R. Goebel *, R. Elmqst **, N. Fletcher * and M. Stock *. * Brea Internatonal des Pods et Mesres, Sèvres, France. ** Natonal Insttte of Standards and Technology, Gathersbrg, USA. Fnal report December 007 Page

Introdcton A comparson of vales assgned to Ω resstance standards was carred ot between the BIPM and the NIST (USA) n the perod Aprl 007 to October 007. Three Ω BIPM travellng standards of CSIRO type were calbrated frst at the BIPM, then at the NIST and agan at the BIPM after ther retrn. The measrement perods are referred to as: 'Before' measrements at the BIPM: Aprl and Jne-Jly 007 NIST measrements: Agst-September 007 'After' measrements at the BIPM: September-October 007 The BIPM calbratons are corrected to the reference temperatre.000 C and the reference pressre 0.5 hpa. Accordng to the protocol, the NIST does not apply pressre and temperatre correctons to ts reslts. The correctons are made by the BIPM, sng the temperatre and pressre coeffcents of the standards together wth the temperatre and pressre measrements provded by the NIST. There s no clear evdence of a sngle lnear drft of each standard over the whole perod of the comparson (three measrement perods, 'Before', 'NIST' and 'After': see Fgres, and ). Drng each perod, the resstance of each standard s therefore assmed to be constant, wth spermposton of a random nose. For each perod, the calbraton vale assgned to each standard s the mean vale of the measrements performed drng ths perod, wth an assocated standard ncertanty. The dfference between the NIST and the BIPM calbratons of a gven standard R can be wrtten as: = R R NIST, BIPM, If three standards are sed, the mean of the dfferences s: NIST BIPM = ( R NIST, = RBIPM, ) () Ths expresson can also be wrtten as: NIST BIPM = R NIST, RBIPM, = = () whch s the dfference of the means. Measrements at the BIPM. BIPM calbratons The BIPM measrements were carred ot by comparson wth a 00 Ω reference resstor (referred to as BI00-) whose vale s known wth respect to the BIPM qantzed Hall resstance (QHR) standard. The comparson s performed sng a DC cryogenc crrent comparator operatng wth a 50 ma crrent n the Ω resstors. In order to mnmze the nterpolaton ncertanty, the 00 Ω reference resstor was calbrated for tmes aganst the QHR n the perod Aprl 007 to October 007. Page

The Ω resstors were kept n a temperatre controlled ol bath at a temperatre whch s close (wthn a few mk) to the reference temperatre. The temperatre of the standards s determned by means of a calbrated SPRT, n conjncton wth thermocoples. Drng the frst perod of measrements at the BIPM, the medm-term dsperson was larger than sal (standard devaton n the range 5 to 7 parts n 0-9 nstead of to 4 parts n 0-9 ). Ths cold be attrbted to the pertrbatons prodced by the refrbshment works n other laboratory rooms n the same bldng. The BIPM measrements are smmarzed n Table and the ncertanty bdget n Table. BIPM Relatve dfference from nomnal Ω vale / 0-6 Std. dev. Std. dev. Standard # BEFORE AFTER B A 649 5.65 0.007 5.88 0.0040 6400 0.76 0.0054 0.795 0.00 6407 0.58 0.0064 0.58 0.0044 Mean vale of 'Before' and 'After' Standard # mean Dsperson / 0-6 / 0-9 Systematc / 0-9 649 5.77 4. 6 6400 0.778. 6 6407 0.58.9 6 Table : Smmary of the BIPM calbratons. The dsperson s estmated by the standard devatons, and 'systematc' refers to the sorces of ncertanty that do not contrbte to the varablty of the reslts. Sorce of ncertanty relatve standard ncertanty Imperfect realsaton of R K-90 x 0-9 Calbraton of the BIPM 00 Ω reference (BI00-) aganst R K-90 x 0-9 Interpolaton / extrapolaton of the vale of BI00- x 0-9 Measrement of the ( Ω / BI00-) rato 8 x 0-9 Temperatre correcton for the Ω standard x 0-9 Pressre correcton for the Ω standard x 0-9 Combned ncertanty 6 x 0-9 Table : BIPM ncertanty bdget for the calbraton of the Ω travellng standards. The vale attrbted to -th standard s the arthmetc mean of the "Before" and "After" vales. R = R + R ) / BIPM, ( Before, After, Page

For each standard, the ncertanty assocated wth the dsperson s the qadratc mean of the standard devatons "Before" and "After". = + ) / (, Before, After, s the ncertanty arsng from the combned contrbtons assocated wth the BIPM measrement faclty and the traceablty, as descrbed n Table. Ths component s assmed to be strongly correlated between calbratons performed n the same perod. For a sngle standard, the BIPM ncertanty BIPM, s obtaned from: The, are assmed to be correlated, nlke,. = + BIPM,,, Usng expresson (), when the mean (for three standards) of the NIST-BIPM relatve dfference s calclated, the BIPM contrbton to the ncertanty s: BIPM = =, + () Usng the vales shown n Table, the relatve standard ncertanty BIPM s BIPM = 6. X 0-9.. Uncertanty assocated wth the transfer d s the ncertanty assocated wth the drft (or the step changes) of the travellng standards observed after ther retrn at the BIPM. The fnal resstance vale attrbted by the BIPM (the mean of the 'Before' and 'After' measrements) s n the mddle of the step d: d = ( R After RBefore) As we have no clear knowledge abot the behavor of the standards drng the perod between 'Before' and 'After', t s assmed that the actal resstance cold have had any vale n the range d, wth eqal probablty. Assmng a rectanglar probablty dstrbton, d = d Another sorce of ncertanty assocated wth the transfer s the dfference n the operatng crrents sed by the two laboratores: 50 ma at the BIPM and 00 ma at the NIST. Ths mght nflence the resstance of the standards throgh ther power coeffcents. A seres of measrements were performed at the BIPM to determne these power coeffcents. Unfortnately, or crrent sorce does not allow crrents as large as 00 ma, and smlarly the NIST faclty can not easly be modfed to operate at 50 ma. The BIPM seres of measrements were therefore carred ot sng alternately I = 50 ma and I /, bt no sgnfcant change cold be observed wthn the nose of the measrements, that s abot part n 0 9. A conservatve vale of the relatve standard ncertanty P assocated wth possble power effects n the range 50 ma 00 ma was estmated to be: P = X 0-9. For a sngle standard, the transfer ncertanty T, s obtaned from: T, = d, + P, The P, are assmed to be correlated, nlke d,. Page 4

Followng the same reasonng as n expresson (), the ncertanty T assocated wth the transfer (for the mean of three standards) s: T = = d, + P TRANSFER Drft Power Standard # d / 0-9 P / 0-9 649 6.7 6400 9.6 6407 0. Combned.9 Total T 4.4 Table : Uncertanty assocated wth the drft and the power coeffcent of the standards. Usng the vales of Table, the relatve standard ncertanty T s: T = 4.4 X 0-9 Page 5

NIST reslts Seral No. of tem(s): 649, 6400, 6407 Manfactrer: CSIRO Standard ncertanty Dstrbton /method of evalaton Senstvty coeffcent Uncertanty contrbton Degrees of freedom Inflence factor y (y ) Method/(A, B) c (R ) (Ω) ν Scalng / traceablty.00e-08 Normal/B Ω.00E-08 00 Reference standards 6.50E-09 Normal/B Ω 6.50E-09 Measrng apparats 4.00E-09 Rectanglar/B Ω 4.00E-09 Ambent condtons: Temperatre.00E-0 C Normal/B Pressre.00E-0 kpa Normal/B Standard devaton.90e-09 Normal/A Ω.90E-09 Table 4: NIST ncertanty bdget (typcal vales; the standard devaton vale s gven as an example). Method: The NIST qantm Hall effect standard was compared twce each year to fve 00 Ω standards sng a cryogenc crrent comparator brdge. For tmes each year, these fve standards were compared to two or three Ω standards of the CSIRO desgn, sng a second cryogenc crrent comparator. These CSIRO-type standards were then sed as transfer standards to mantan the mean reference vale of a grop of fve Thomas-type Ω standards n an atomated potentometer measrement system based on a commercal crrent comparator brdge (Gldlne 990). The Ω comparson standards were compared to ths reference grop sng the same potentometrc system. Measrements were repeated on days n the NIST segment of the comparson. All measrements were sed to determne the average resstance vale relatve to the NIST measrement standards. Measrement temperatre control: The reference standards were mantaned n a mneral ol bath mantaned at 5.000 C as measred by a calbrated SPRT and thermometer brdge (Hart 575). The BIPM comparson standards were measred n a mneral ol bath mantaned at nomnal.00 C as measred by a calbrated thermstor probe (Flke 5640). The thermstor measrements were corrected sng a calbrated SPRT and thermometer brdge (Hart 575). Test crrent: Drect crrent wth reversal, measred at 00 ma. Hmdty: Relatve hmdty n the laboratory averaged 40%. Seral No. of tem: Average measrement date, tme Resstance vale (Ω) Standard devaton vale (Ω) Temperatre Barometrc pressre ncldng mneral ol 649 5-Ag-007, 0:00 0.999 994 88.6 x 0-9.9984 C 0.05 kpa 6400 5-Ag-007, 0:00 0.999 999 0.9 x 0-9.9984 C 0.05 kpa 6407 5-Ag-007, 0:00 0.999 999 40.8 x 0-9.9984 C 0.05 kpa Table 5: Smmary of the NIST calbratons. The NIST reslts are corrected to the reference temperatre and the reference pressre sng the coeffcents shown n Table 6. Page 6

Relatve temperatre coeffcents Relatve pressre coeffcents. Standard # Alpha / (0-6 /K) Beta / (0-6 /K²) / (0-9 /hpa) 649 0.004 0.00 0.7 6400 0.007 0.000 0. 6407 0.009 0.000 0.5 Table 6: Temperatre and pressre coeffcents of the travellng standards. Reference temperatre =.000 C Reference pressre = 0.5 hpa Relatve correctons appled to the NIST reslts Standard # For temperatre For pressre 649 6.4 x 0-4.7 x 0-0 6400. x 0-6. x 0-0 6407.4 x 0-6.9 x 0-0 Table 7: Correctons for temperatre and pressre appled to the NIST reslts. There s no addtonal ncertanty assocated wth these correctons. The contrbtons arsng from the ncertantes assocated wth the temperatre and pressre measrements at NIST are neglgble de to the very small sze of the correctons. In Table 8, s the ncertanty assocated wth the dsperson (see Table 5, colmn 4) and combnes the other contrbtons (frst three lnes n Table 4). NIST After correctons Resstance / Ω Relatve dfference from Relatve standard ncertantes nomnal. Dsperson Others / 0-6 / 0-9 / 0-9 649 0.99999488 5.85.6.6 6400 0.9999999 0.7806.9.6 6407 0.99999949 0.5707.8.6 Table 8: Smmary of the NIST reslts, after correctons for temperatre and pressre. For a sngle standard, the NIST ncertanty NIST, s obtaned from: NIST, =, +, The, are assmed to be correlated, nlke the,. Usng expresson (), when the mean (for three standards) of the NIST-BIPM relatve dfference s calclated, the NIST contrbton to the ncertanty s:, NIST = + (5) = Usng the vales shown n Table 8, the relatve standard ncertanty NIST s NIST =.7 X 0-9. Page 7

4 Comparson NIST BIPM The dfferences between the vales assgned by the NIST at the NIST, R NIST, and those assgned by the BIPM at the BIPM, R BIPM, to each of the three travellng standards drng the perod of the comparson are shown n Table 9. Standard # NIST - BIPM (R NIST R BIPM ) / ( Ω) / 0-6 649 0.006 6400 0.00 6407 0.0 mean 0.04 Table 9: Dfferences between the vales assgned by the NIST (R NIST ) and by the BIPM (R BIPM ) to the three travellng standards. The mean dfference between the NIST and the BIPM calbratons s: (R NIST R BIPM ) / ( Ω) = 0.04 0 6 The relatve combned standard ncertanty of the comparson, C, s: = + + C BIPM NIST where BIPM = 6. X 0-9, NIST =.7 X 0-9, T = 4.4 X 0-9 as calclated n sectons and : C = 0.0 X 0-6 T The NIST and the BIPM calbratons are n good agreement, wth a dfference smaller than one standard ncertanty. The fnal reslt of the comparson s presented as the degree of eqvalence D between the NIST and the BIPM for vales assgned to Ω resstance standards, and ts expanded relatve ncertanty (expanson factor k = ), U C D = [(R NIST R BIPM ) / Ω] = 0.04 0 6 U C = 0.04 0 6 Page 8

-5.5 Standard # 649-5.6 Dfference from nomnal / 0-6 -5.7-5.8-5.9 BIPM 'Before' x 0-8 - NIST - -5.0 BIPM 'After' -5. 5/04/007 5/05/007 4/06/007 4/07/007 /08/007 /09/007 /0/007 Date Fgre : Calbratons at the BIPM (sqares) and at the NIST (crcles) of the travellng standard ref. 649, expressed as the relatve devaton from the nomnal Ω vale. -0.75 Standard # 6400-0.76 Dfference from nomnal / 0-6 -0.77-0.78-0.79 BIPM 'Before' x 0-8 - NIST - -0.80 BIPM 'After' -0.8 5/04/007 5/05/007 4/06/007 4/07/007 /08/007 /09/007 /0/007 Date Fgre : Calbratons at the BIPM (sqares) and at the NIST (crcles) of the travellng standard ref. 6400, expressed as the relatve devaton from the nomnal Ω vale. Page 9

-0.5 Standard # 6407-0.5 Dfference from nomnal / 0-6 -0.54-0.55-0.56-0.57 BIPM 'Before' BIPM 'After' x 0-8 -0.58 - NIST - -0.59 5/04/007 5/05/007 4/06/007 4/07/007 /08/007 /09/007 /0/007 Date Fgre : Calbratons at the BIPM (sqares) and at the NIST (crcles) of the travellng standard ref. 6407, expressed as the relatve devaton from the nomnal Ω vale. Page 0