Process. Controller. Output. Measurement. Comparison FIGURE 4.1. A closed-loop system. Dorf/Bishop Modern Control Systems 9/E

Similar documents
R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

Reduction of Multiple Subsystems

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

Bode and Log Magnitude Plots

Motor Control. Suppose we wish to use a microprocessor to control a motor - (or to control the load attached to the motor!) Power supply.

Lab 11. Speed Control of a D.C. motor. Motor Characterization

LESSON 21: METHODS OF SYSTEM ANALYSIS

Lecture 9. Lab 16 System Identification (2 nd or 2 sessions) Lab 17 Proportional Control

ME 375 System Modeling and Analysis

Lecture 10. Lab next week: Agenda: Control design fundamentals. Proportional Control Proportional-Integral Control

Chapter 1: Introduction

Power Management for Computer Systems. Prof. C Wang

MEM01: DC-Motor Servomechanism

ECE317 : Feedback and Control

EC CONTROL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING

High Performance Robust Control of Magnetic Suspension Systems Using GIMC Structure

Boise State University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 212L Circuit Analysis and Design Lab

DC motor control using arduino

Closed-loop System, PID Controller

Readings: FC: p : lead compensation. 9/9/2011 Classical Control 1

Frequency Response Analysis and Design Tutorial

Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester Amme 3500 : Root Locus Design

ANNA UNIVERSITY :: CHENNAI MODEL QUESTION PAPER(V-SEMESTER) B.E. ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING EC334 - CONTROL SYSTEMS

MTE 360 Automatic Control Systems University of Waterloo, Department of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering

MM7 Practical Issues Using PID Controllers

Cleveland State University MCE441: Intr. Linear Control Systems. Lecture 12: Frequency Response Concepts Bode Diagrams. Prof.

110A SERIES REPAIR PARTS INDEX

California University of Pennsylvania Department of Applied Engineering & Technology Electrical Engineering Technology

EE233 Autumn 2016 Electrical Engineering University of Washington. EE233 HW7 Solution. Nov. 16 th. Due Date: Nov. 23 rd

6.002 Circuits and Electronics Final Exam Practice Set 1

Automatic Control Systems 2017 Spring Semester

FET Biasing. Electronic Circuit Design ME /8/2013. Spring Chapter 2. Chapter Contents. Course Support

NOISE IN SC CIRCUITS

Attia, John Okyere. Plotting Commands. Electronics and Circuit Analysis using MATLAB. Ed. John Okyere Attia Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC, 1999

ME 5281 Fall Homework 8 Due: Wed. Nov. 4th; start of class.

4 Experiment 4: DC Motor Voltage to Speed Transfer Function Estimation by Step Response and Frequency Response (Part 2)

Comparative Study of PID and Fuzzy Controllers for Speed Control of DC Motor

An Overview of Linear Systems

Chapter 10: Operational Amplifiers

EE 482 : CONTROL SYSTEMS Lab Manual

Electrical Engineering / Electromagnetics

Välkomna till TSRT15 Reglerteknik Föreläsning 8

Electromagnetic Induction. Transformer 5/16/11

UNIT 2: DC MOTOR POSITION CONTROL

Chapter 4 Single-stage MOS amplifiers

DOING PHYSICS WITH MATLAB RESONANCE CIRCUITS RLC PARALLEL VOLTAGE DIVIDER

An Introduction to Proportional- Integral-Derivative (PID) Controllers

EE 370/L Feedback and Control Systems Lab Section Post-Lab Report. EE 370L Feedback and Control Systems Lab

PI Tuning via Extremum Seeking Methods for Cruise Control

NPTEL Online Course: Control Engineering

PID-control and open-loop control

Rotary Motion Servo Plant: SRV02. Rotary Experiment #02: Position Control. SRV02 Position Control using QuaRC. Student Manual

ISSN: (Online) Volume 2, Issue 1, January 2014 International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies

Intelligent Learning Control Strategies for Position Tracking of AC Servomotor

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Lab 2: Characterization of Lab System Components

Complex Numbers in Electronics

Lecture 5 Introduction to control

PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

Open Loop Frequency Response

Unit 4: Block Diagram Reduction. Block Diagram Reduction. Cascade Form Parallel Form Feedback Form Moving Blocks Example

MSK4310 Demonstration

The University of Texas at Austin Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Midterm #2

Introduction to MOSFET MOSFET (Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor)

Phys Lecture 5. Motors

ME 144L Prof. R.G. Longoria Dynamic Systems and Controls Laboratory. Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin

Dr Ian R. Manchester

Introduction. A Simple Example. 3. fo = 4; %frequency of the sine wave. 4. Fs = 100; %sampling rate. 5. Ts = 1/Fs; %sampling time interval

Feedback Systems. Many embedded system applications involve the concept of feedback. Sometimes feedback is designed into systems: Actuator

Root Locus Design. by Martin Hagan revised by Trevor Eckert 1 OBJECTIVE

SKEE 3732 BASIC CONTROL LABORATORY (Experiment 1) ANGULAR SPEED CONTROL

Motomatic Servo Control

ROBONAUT 2: FIRST HUMANOID ROBOT IN SPACE

JUNE 2014 Solved Question Paper

Matched N-Channel JFET Pairs

EES42042 Fundamental of Control Systems Bode Plots

FET, BJT, OpAmp Guide

Matched N-Channel JFET Pairs

Industrial Control Equipment. ACS-1000 Analog Control System

AP Physics Electricity and Magnetism #7 Inductance

A NEW EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE TOOL FOR ROBUST CONTROL DESIGN USING THE QFT METHOD

MEM380 Applied Autonomous Robots I Winter Feedback Control USARSim

A PID Controller for Real-Time DC Motor Speed Control using the C505C Microcontroller

Sfwr Eng/TRON 3DX4, Lab 4 Introduction to Computer Based Control

Lecture 48 Review of Feedback HW # 4 Erickson Problems Ch. 9 # s 7 &9 and questions in lectures I. Review of Negative Feedback

Electrical Engineering. Control Systems. Comprehensive Theory with Solved Examples and Practice Questions. Publications

, answer the next six questions.

Outline. Digital Control. Lecture 3

Rotary Motion Servo Plant: SRV02. Rotary Experiment #03: Speed Control. SRV02 Speed Control using QuaRC. Student Manual

PYKC 13 Feb 2017 EA2.3 Electronics 2 Lecture 8-1

Homework 2 Solutions. Perform.op analysis, the small-signal parameters of M1 and M2 are shown below.

Designing Information Devices and Systems I Fall 2018 Homework 10

DOING PHYSICS WITH MATLAB RESONANCE CIRCUITS SERIES RLC CIRCUITS

CHAPTER 1 Introduction of Control System

Chapter 5 Frequency-domain design

LabVIEW and MatLab. E80 Teaching Team. February 5, 2008

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design. Frequency Domain Performance Specifications

Tracking Position Control of AC Servo Motor Using Enhanced Iterative Learning Control Strategy

BSNL TTA Question Paper Control Systems Specialization 2007

(1) Identify individual entries in a Control Loop Diagram. (2) Sketch Bode Plots by hand (when we could have used a computer

HD25. Industrial Rugged Metal Optical Encoder Page 1 of 6. Description. Mechanical Drawing. Features

Transcription:

Controller Process Output Comparison Measurement FIGURE 4. A closed-loop system.

R(s) E a (s) G(s) Y(s) R(s) E a (s) G(s) Y(s) H(s) H(s) FIGURE 4.3 A closed-loop control system (a feedback system).

v in v 0 Gain v in v K 0 a R Gain R K p a R 2 (a) (b) FIGURE 4.4 (a) Open loop amplifier. (b) Amplifier with feedback.

v in K a v 0 b FIGURE 4.5 Block diagram model of feedback amplifier assuming R p W R 0 of the amplifier.

R a I a i f constant field current E k 2 V a Speed v(t) J, b Load FIGURE 4.7 Open-loop speed control system (without feedback).

R(s) k 2 E s Amplifier K a V a (s) Motor G(s) Speed v(s) V t (s) Tachometer K t (a) Tachometer Motor (b) FIGURE 4.8 (a) Closed-loop speed control system. (b) Transistorized closed-loop speed control system.

.0 0.9 0.8 Closed-loop 0.7 v(t) K k 2 E 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 Open-loop (without feedback) 0.2 0. 0 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 2 3 4 5 Time (seconds) FIGURE 4.9 The response of the open-loop and closed-loop speed control system whent 5 0 and K K a K t 00. The time to reach 98% of the final value for the open-loop and closedloop system is 40 seconds and 0.4 second, respectively.

Rolls Steel bar Conveyor FIGURE 4.0 Steel rolling mill.

Disturbance T d (s) V a (s) R a I a (s) K m T m (s) T L (s) Js b v(s) Speed Motor back emf K b FIGURE 4. Open-loop speed control system (without external feedback).

T d (s) R(s) E a (s) Amplifier K a K m R a T m (s) T L (s) Js b v(s) K b V t (s) Tachometer K t FIGURE 4.3 Closed-loop speed tachometer control system.

T d (s) R(s) E a (s) G (s) G 2 (s) v(s) H(s) (a) T d (s) R(s) E a (s) G (s) G 2 (s) v(s) H(s) (b) FIGURE 4.4 Closed-loop system. (a) Block diagram model. (b) Signal-flow graph model.

R(s) G (s) G 2 (s) Y(s) H 2 (s) H (s) Sensor N(s) Noise FIGURE 4.6 Closed-loop control system with measurement noise.

R(s) Desired angle E(s) K s D(s) G(s) Boring machine s(s ) Y(s) Angle FIGURE 4.2 A block diagram model of a boring machine control system.

.4.2 y(t) (deg) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.5.5 2 2.5 3 Time (sec) (a) 0.02 0.0 0.008 y(t) (deg) 0.006 0.004 0.002 0 0 0.5.5 2 2.5 3 FIGURE 4.22 The response y(t) to (a) a unit input step r(t) and (b) a unit disturbance step input D(s) 5 /s for K 00.

.2 0.8 y(t) (deg) 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.5.5 2 2.5 3 Time (sec) FIGURE 4.23 The response y(t) for a unit step input (solid line) and for a unit step disturbance (dashed line) for K 20.

FIGURE 4.24 The solar-powered Mars rover, named Sojourner, landed on Mars on July 4, 997 and was deployed on its journey on July 5, 997. The 23-pound rover is controlled by an operator on Earth using controls on the rover [2, 22]. (Photo courtesy of NASA.)

R(s) Controller K(s )(s 3) s 2 4s 5 D(s) Rover (s )(s 3) Y(s) Vehicle position (a) R(s) r(t) t, t 0 K D(s) Rover (s )(s 3) Y(s) Vehicle position (b) FIGURE 4.25 Control system for rover; (a) open-loop (without feedback) and (b) closed-loop with feedback. The input is R(s) /s.

.0 Magnitude of sensitivity vs. frequency.05.00 Magnitude of sensitivity 0.95 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.60 0 0 0 0 0 2 Frequency (rad/s) FIGURE 4.26 The magnitude of the sensitivity of the closed-loop system for the Mars rover vehicle.

R(s) Desired head position Error Disturbance D(s) Amplifier Coil Load V(s) K m K a R + L s s(js + b) Sensor Y (s) Actual position H(s) = FIGURE 4.32 Control system for disk drive head reader.

R(s) Disturbance D(s) Coil Load E(s) 5000 K a G (s) = G (s + 000) 2 (s) = s(s + 20) Y (s) FIGURE 4.33 Disk drive head control system with the typical parameters of Table 2..

(a) Ka=0; nf=[5000]; df=[ 000]; sysf=tf(nf,df); ng=[]; dg=[ 20 0]; sysg=tf(ng,dg); sysa=series(ka*sysf,sysg); sys=feedback(sysa,[]); t=[0:0.0:2]; step(sys,t); ylabel('y(t)'), xlabel('time (sec)'), grid Select K a. (b) y(t) y(t).0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0. 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8.0.2.4.6.8 2.0 Time (sec).2.0 0.8 0.6 K a = 0. 0.4 0.2 K a = 80. 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8.0.2.4.6.8 2.0 Time (sec) FIGURE 4.34 Closed-loop response. (a) MATLAB script. (b) Step response for Ka 0 and Ka 80.

(a) Ka=80; nf=[5000]; df=[ 000]; sysf=tf(nf,df); ng=[]; dg=[ 20 0]; sysg=tf(ng,dg); sys=feedback(sysg,ka*sysf); sys= sys; t=[0:0.0:2]; step(sys,t); plot(t,y), grid ylabel('y(t)'), xlabel('time (sec)'), grid Select K a. Disturbance enters summer with a negative sign. 0 x 0-3 -0.5 (b) y(t) - -.5 K a = 80. -2-2.5-3 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8.0.2.4.6.8 2.0 Time (sec) FIGURE 4.35 Disturbance step response. (a) MATLAB script. (b) Disturbance response for K a 80.

D(s) R(s) K (s ) 2 Y(s) (a).40.00 0.70 e(t) 0.50 0.08 0 K.0 K 0 0.70 0 2 3 4 5 Time (b) FIGURE 4.36 (a) A single-loop feedback control system. (b) The error response for a unit step disturbance when R(s) 0.