Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) Chapter 4 Systems Engineering Update: Overview Briefing

Similar documents
DoD Modeling and Simulation Support to Acquisition

DoDI and WSARA* Impacts on Early Systems Engineering

DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE SELF-ASSESSMENT. Outcomes and Enablers

Advancing the Use of the Digital System Model Taxonomy

R&M: Critical to Success in a Technology Reliant World

DoD Engineering and Better Buying Power 3.0

Program Success Through SE Discipline in Technology Maturity. Mr. Chris DiPetto Deputy Director Developmental Test & Evaluation October 24, 2006

Models, Simulations, and Digital Engineering in Systems Engineering Restructure (Defense Acquisition University CLE011)

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Acquisition Reform Initiative #3: Improving the Integration and Synchronization of Science and Technology)

Administrative Change to AFRLI , Science and Technology (S&T) Systems Engineering (SE) and Technical Management

WSARA Impacts on Early Acquisition

OSD Engineering Enterprise: Digital Engineering Initiatives

Michael Gaydar Deputy Director Air Platforms, Systems Engineering

A New Way to Start Acquisition Programs

A Case Study to Examine Technical Data Relationships to the System Model Concept

Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA) Advanced Technology Support Program IV (ATSP4) Organizational Perspective and Technical Requirements

Update on R&M Engineering Activities: Rebuilding Military Readiness

Synopsis and Impact of DoDI

Digital Engineering. Phoenix Integration Conference Ms. Philomena Zimmerman. Deputy Director, Engineering Tools and Environments.

DOD Technology Innovation & Transition

Technology & Manufacturing Readiness RMS

Engineering Autonomy

NIMS UPDATE 2017 RUPERT DENNIS, FEMA REGION IV, NIMS COORDINATOR. National Preparedness Directorate / National Integration Center.

A Review Of Technical Performance and Technology Maturity Approaches for Improved Developmental Test and Evaluation Assessment

Digital Engineering. Ms. Philomena Zimmerman. Deputy Director, Engineering Tools and Environments OUSD(R&E)/Systems Engineering

Autonomy Test & Evaluation Verification & Validation (ATEVV) Challenge Area

Technology Transition Assessment in an Acquisition Risk Management Context

Digital Engineering (DE) and Computational Research and Engineering Acquisition Tools and Environments (CREATE)

Digital Engineering and Engineered Resilient Systems (ERS)

Reducing Manufacturing Risk Manufacturing Readiness Levels

An Assessment of Acquisition Outcomes and Potential Impact of Legislative and Policy Changes

Click to edit Master title style. Joint Service Small Arms Technology Plan

Digital Engineering Support to Mission Engineering

COMMERCIAL INDUSTRY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BEST PRACTICES Richard Van Atta

Open Systems Architecture in DoD Acquisition: Opportunities and Challenges

DoD Joint Federated Assurance Center (JFAC) Industry Outreach

DUSD (S&T) Software Intensive Systems

The Role of the Communities of Interest (COIs) March 25, Dr. John Stubstad Director, Space & Sensor Systems, OASD (Research & Engineering)

Jerome Tzau TARDEC System Engineering Group. UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release. 14 th Annual NDIA SE Conf Oct 2011

DoD Research and Engineering

Integrated Transition Solutions

Michael Coughenour Lockheed Martin Rotary & Mission Systems (RMS) System Engineering Technologist

Are Rapid Fielding and Good Systems Engineering Mutually Exclusive?

Gaining Control and Predictability of Software-Intensive Systems Development and Sustainmen

The Drive for Innovation in Systems Engineering

DRAFT. February 2007 DRAFT. Prepared by the Joint Defense Manufacturing Technology Panel Manufacturing Readiness Level Working Group

Analysis of Alternatives (AoAs) from a Cost Estimating Perspective

Manufacturing Readiness Level Deskbook

Spiral Acquisition and the Integrated Command and Control System

Modeling & Simulation Roadmap for JSTO-CBD IS CAPO

GAO Technology Readiness Assessment Guide: Best Practices for Evaluating and Managing Technology Risk in Capital Acquisition Programs

Fifteenth Annual INCOSE Region II Mini-Conference. 30 October 2010 San Diego

Prototyping: Accelerating the Adoption of Transformative Capabilities

TECHNICAL RISK ASSESSMENT: INCREASING THE VALUE OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS ASSESSMENT (TRA)

Four Conference Breakout Sessions

Final Report of the Subcommittee on the Identification of Modeling and Simulation Capabilities by Acquisition Life Cycle Phase (IMSCALCP)

Policy Perspective: The Current and Proposed Security Framework

A Systems Engineering Perspective on Innovation

Module 1 - Lesson 102 RDT&E Activities

Cross-Service Collaboration Yields Management Efficiencies for Diminishing Resources

Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) requires the intelligence community. Threat Support Improvement. for DoD Acquisition Programs

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Shopping List Item No. 127 Page 1 of 1

Challenges and Opportunities in the Changing Science & Technology Landscape

Air Force Research Laboratory

RAPID FIELDING A Path for Emerging Concept and Capability Prototyping

Panel: Systems Engineering Considerations in Practicing Test & Evaluation A Perspective from DoD

An Industry Response to the Acquisition Changes

DMSMS Management: After Years of Evolution, There s Still Room for Improvement

Other Transaction Agreements. Chemical Biological Defense Acquisition Initiatives Forum

Agile Engineering of Scalable Enterprise-Level Capabilities

2 August 2017 Prof Jeff Craver So you are Conducting a Technology Readiness Assessment? What to Know

Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Business Case Considerations An Enabler of Risk Reduction

Test & Evaluation Strategy for Technology Development Phase

Manufacturing Readiness Assessments of Technology Development Projects

Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs) and Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs)

Modeling Enterprise Systems

INTRODUCTION TO JOINT CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS (JCTD) 11 JULY 2018

The US/UK Bilateral on improving software acquisition - a UK view

Our Acquisition Challenges Moving Forward

4 Briefing. Responsible investor

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Department of Energy Technology Readiness Assessments Process Guide and Training Plan

2017 AIR FORCE CORROSION CONFERENCE Corrosion Policy, Oversight, & Processes

2017 NIMS Update. John Ford, National Integration Center

Facilitating Human System Integration Methods within the Acquisition Process

Chemical-Biological Defense S&T For Homeland Security

Unit 2: Understanding NIMS

Technology Roadmapping. Lesson 3

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE S: Microelectronics Technology Development and Support (DMEA) FY 2013 OCO

Manufacturing Readiness Assessment (MRA) Deskbook

Gerald G. Boyd, Tom D. Anderson, David W. Geiser

Integrated Reporting WG

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT IN DOD ACQUISITION

EDUCATION AND TRAINING

An Element of Digital Engineering Practice in Systems Acquisition

Report to Congress regarding the Terrorism Information Awareness Program

Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook Version 2016

U.S. Combat Aircraft Industry, : Structure, Competition, Innovation

Closing the Knowledge-Deficit in the Defense Acquisition System: A Case Study

Transcription:

Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) Chapter 4 Systems Engineering Update: Overview Briefing Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering May 2013 https://acc.dau.mil/dag4 May 2013 Page-1

Why Update the DAG Chapter 4? Improve guidance to fully reflect current policy and DASD(SE) initiatives Define systems engineering activities to support the updated Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction (CJCSI) 3170.01H) Reflect Better Buying Power initiatives Respond to systems engineering systemic root cause analyses recommendations from program assessments Incorporate Department-wide best practices; avoiding Service and domainspecific implementations Improve currency, consistency, usability, and readability less theory, more utility Emphasize the role of Systems Engineering in providing balanced solutions (managing cost, schedule and risk) that deliver needed capability to the war fighter Make Chapter 4 a more effective tool for the Program Manager and the Systems Engineering Practitioner May 2013 Page-2

Update Approach and Participation Used a product-centered approach, where the product is the weapon system or capability under development Threaded policy, activities/processes, and product together Policy (Direction / Requirement) Process (How) Product (What) Did not restate policy, rather clarified intent of policy and identified expectations Avoided inventing policy and removed preferences Minimized number of links (improved information flow) Included DoD-wide participation in update 24 organizations (DoD Services/Agencies) 149 participants contributed as authors, collaborators, reviewers, and independent subject matter experts (includes ODASD(SE)) May 2013 Page-3

The New DAG Chapter 4 Message and Framework SE provides balanced approach in delivering a capability to the warfighter SE supports program success through systematically increasing maturity and reducing risk over the acquisition life cycle 4.1 Introduction Systems Engineering Definition Why it s important 4.2 Systems Engineering Activities in the Life Cycle Description of Technical Maturity Points By-phase description of key technical activities Technical Reviews and Audits 4.3 Systems Engineering Processes Description of technical and technical management processes Design Considerations (include Specialty Engineering) May 2013 Page-4

DAG Chapter 4 Outline https://acc.dau.mil/dag4 4.0 Overview 4.0.1 Purpose 4.0.2 Contents 4.1 Introduction 4.1.1 Systems Engineering Policy and Guidance 4.1.2 Systems Engineering Plan 4.1.3 Systems Level Considerations 4.1.4 Engineering Resources 4.1.5 Certifications 4.1.6 Systems Engineering Role in Contracting 4.2 Systems Engineering Activities in the Life Cycle 4.2.1 Life Cycle Expectations 4.2.2 4.2.7 Acquisition Phases 4.2.8 4.2.17 Technical Reviews and Audits 4.3 Systems Engineering Processes 4.3.1 Systems Engineering Processes Overview 4.3.2 4.3.9 Technical Management Processes 4.3.10 4.3.17 Technical Processes 4.3.18 Design Considerations (includes 24 subsections, one for each design consideration) 4.3.19 Tools, Techniques, and Lessons Learned May 2013 Page-5

New DAG Chapter 4 Major Content Changes Focused on target audience being Program Manager and Systems Engineering practitioners Consolidated and strengthened Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Outline content in 4.1.2 Added new content: 4.1.3 Systems Level Considerations (includes Software) 4.1.5 Certifications 4.1.6 Systems Engineering Role in Contracting 4.3.19 Sustainability Analysis Added detailed SE technical reviews and audits information (4.2.8-4.2.17) Enhanced Design Considerations section 4.3.18: Streamlined Parts Management and Standardization Added new subsections: Anti-Counterfeiting; Intelligence; Operational Energy; and Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation (PHS&T) Added guidance for Producibility (under Producibility, Quality, and Manufacturing Readiness) Removed/reduced topics covered in other DAG chapters Earned Value Management and Integrated Baseline Reviews (IBR) content removed, both found in Chapter 11 Program Management Test and Evaluation content reduced, found in Chapter 9 Test & Evaluation Removed phase-specific systems engineering V s May 2013 Page-6

DAG Chapter 4 Version Comparison Content DAG Chapter 4 (October 2012) DAG Chapter 4 (February 2013) Major Sections 7 (4.0 to 4.6) SEP Outline Technical Reviews and Audits Design Considerations Added content Note: 4.0 included SE definition and SE Policy and Guidance Content split between two locations: 4.1 SE Overview 4.5 SE Execution: Key SE Tools and Techniques Missing guidance on mandatory table for Certifications Embedded in phases throughout 4.3 Summary in 4.5.9 4 (4.0 to 4.3) Expanded 4.1 Intro to include SE definition and SE Policy and Guidance Removed 2 sections related to tools (embedded content into 4.1 Intro and 4.3 SE Processes) Moved 1 section on Design Considerations (embedded into 4.3 SE Processes) Consolidated into one section, 4.1.2 Systems Engineering Plan Strengthened content supporting SEP Outline (e.g., Technical Performance Measures, Design Considerations) Added new section 4.1.5 Certifications Detailed information on SE Technical Reviews and Audits, 4.2.8-17 Separated out from phases, focused on technical maturity and risk Changed ASR based on CJCSI 3170.01H demand signal Removed ITR, IBRs, TRR 22 in section 4.4 24 in section 4.3.18 Combined Parts Management and Standardization Moved Software to 4.1.3 Systems Level Considerations 4 New: Anti-Counterfeiting, Intelligence, Operational Energy, PHS&T Added guidance for Producibility (under PQM) Added 4.1.3 Systems Level Considerations Added 4.1.6 SE Role in Contracting Added 4.3.19. Sustainability Analysis Non-SE content Earned Value Management (EVM) Integrated Baseline Reviews (IBR) (one per each acquisition life cycle phase) Test and Evaluation (T&E) content Removed EVM, covered in DAG Chapter 11 PM Activities Removed IBRs, covered in DAG Chapter 11 PM Activities T&E content reduced, linked to DAG Chapter 9 Test & Evaluation May 2013 Page-7

Other Changes Between DAG Chapter 4 Versions Metric DAG Chapter 4 (October 2012) DAG Chapter 4 (February 2013) Page Count 197 250 (minus table of contents) Links 825 (478 external, 347 internal to DAG Chapter 4) Sections 7 (4.0 4.6) Diagrams 14 (includes 5 different V diagrams) 359 (external only) 4 (4.0 4.3) 34 (includes life cycle diagram depicted 17 times; removed phase specific V diagrams) Design Considerations 22 24 SE Processes 16 16 (Implementation Process includes design and realization) May 2013 Page-8

Updated DAG Chapter 4 posted to DAU website in May 2013 https://acc.dau.mil/dag4 For additional information, contact dasd-se@osd.mil May 2013 Page-9

Backup May 2013 Page-10

DAG Chapter 4 October 2012 Outline 4.0 Overview 4.0.1 Contents 4.0.2 Definition of Systems Engineering 4.0.3 DoD Policy and Guidance on Systems Engineering 4.1 Systems Engineering Overview 4.1.1 Systems Engineering in DoD Acquisition 4.1.2 Participants in Systems Engineering 4.1.3 Systems Engineering Throughout Life-cycle Management 4.1.4 System of Systems (SoS) Engineering 4.1.5 Systems Engineering Within the Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD) Framework 4.1.6 Systems Engineering Leadership 4.2 Systems Engineering Processes: How systems Engineering is Conducted 4.2.1 Process Standards and Capability Models to Accomplish Systems Engineering 4.2.2 The Contractor s Systems Engineering Processes 4.2.3 Standardization Process Terminology 4.2.4 Application of Systems Engineering Processes 4.3 Systems Engineering Activities in the System Life Cycle 4.3.1 4.3.5 Acquisition Phases 4.3.6 Evolutionary Acquisition Programs 4.4 Systems Engineering Design Considerations 4.4.1 4.4.22 (22 subsections on design considerations) 4.5 Systems Engineering Execution: Key Systems Engineering Tools and Techniques 4.5.1 Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) 4.5.2 Integrated Master Plan (IMP) 4.5.3 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) 4.5.4 Earned Value Management (EVM) and Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) 4.5.5 Value Engineering (VE) 4.5.6 Types of Technical Assessments 4.5.7 Trade Studies 4.5.8 Modeling and Simulations (M&S) 4.5.9 Summary of Technical Reviews 4.6 Systems Engineering Resources and Tools 4.6.1 Best Practices 4.6.2 Case Studies 4.6.3 Lessons Learned 4.6.4 Standards and Models 4.6.5 Handbooks and Guides May 2013 Page-11