Large Kool Mµ Core Shapes

Similar documents
Large Kool Mµ Core Shapes

Large Kool Mµ Core Shapes

LEAKAGE FLUX CONSIDERATIONS ON KOOL Mµ E CORES

Experience the Power of Confidence

POWDER CORES. Molypermalloy High Flux Kool Mµ XFlux Kool Mµ MAX

FERRITE CORES 2012 CATALOG

Technical Bulletin. Curve Fit Equations for Ferrite Materials. Curve Fit Formulae for Filtering Applications BULLETIN FC-S7

SMALLER-FASTER- OW R CO$T

SMALLER-FASTER- OW R CO$T

Powder Cores. Molypermalloy High Flux

Experience the Power of Confidence

Iron Powder Cores for High Q Inductors By: Jim Cox - Micrometals, Inc.

TAPE WOUND CORES. 48 Alloy Orthonol Magnesil Permalloy 80 Supermalloy

Gapped ferrite toroids for power inductors. Technical Note

HOME APPLICATION NOTES

MAGNETIC POWDER CORES

What is an Inductor? Token Electronics Industry Co., Ltd. Version: January 16, Web:

A Fresh Look at Design of Buck and Boost inductors for SMPS Converters

TRAFTOR WINDINGS CHANGING THE RULES TOROIDAL INDUCTORS & TRANSFORMERS SOLUTIONS PROVIDER AND MANUFACTURER

Iron Powder Core Selection For RF Power Applications. Jim Cox Micrometals, Inc. Anaheim, CA

Glossary of Common Magnetic Terms

Magnetics Product Roundup

Enhancing Induction Heating Processes by Applying Magnetic Flux Controllers

Looking for magnetic parts? Low Permeability Nanocrystalline Cores Nanophy. Material on design Permeability on demand

GeckoMAGNETICS Modeling Inductive Components

STUDY AND DESIGN ASPECTS OF INDUCTORS FOR DC-DC CONVERTER

Line Frequency Transformer

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

Soft Magnetics Application Guide

Outcomes from this session

Topic 4 Practical Magnetic Design: Inductors and Coupled Inductors

Switch Mode Power Supplies and their Magnetics

Published in: Proceedings of the 29th Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, APEC 2014.

Magnetics Design. Specification, Performance and Economics

FERRITE CORE INDUCTOR VALUE VARIATION WITH NUMBER OF TURNS AND DIAMETER OF COPPER WIRE,LENGTH AND DIAMETER OF CORE

Inductor and Transformer Design

LM78S40 Switching Voltage Regulator Applications

Induction heating of internal

Developing a Core Loss Model. Effect of Temperature on Core Loss Effect of Duty Cycle on Core Loss

Selecting Magnetics for High Frequency Converters Practical Hints and Suggestions for Getting Started. Industry Session on Magnetics APEC 2016

Design Considerations

Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9, 1060 Wien, Austria, 2

FAULT CURRENT LIMITER SURGE PROTECTION DEVICE FOR THE POWER GRID BASED UPON ZERO POWER CONSUMPTION CERAMIC FERRITE PERMANENT MAGNETS

(2) New Standard IEEE P (3) Core : (4) Windings :

TOROIDAL CORES : IRON POWDER CORES

Inductor Glossary. Token Electronics Industry Co., Ltd. Version: January 16, Web:

Impact of Fringing Effects on the Design of DC-DC Converters

University of Pittsburgh

INVESTIGATION OF TOROIDAL INDUCTORS BASED ON NON-GRAIN ORIENTED SILICON STEEL: COMPARATIVE STUDY

Powder Cores MPP / High Flux / High Flux Prime / Sendust / Power Flux / Ultra Flux / Special Shape Core / SMD Metal Core 东部电子材料有限公司

MAGNETIC PRODUCTS. SMD Beads and Chokes

DESIGNING COUPLED INDUCTORS

Minntronix Technical Note

THE UNDER HUNG VOICE COIL MOTOR ASSEMBLY REVISITED IN THE LARGE SIGNAL DOMAIN BY STEVE MOWRY

Walchand Institute of Technology. Basic Electrical and Electronics Engineering. Transformer

Vishay Siliconix AN724 Designing A High-Frequency, Self-Resonant Reset Forward DC/DC For Telecom Using Si9118/9 PWM/PSM Controller.

V I S H A y I n T E R T E C H n O l O G y, I n C. In D u C T O R S In S T R u C TIO n A l INDuCtOR 101 Gu ID E w w w. v i s h a y.

1 K Hinds 2012 TRANSFORMERS

800 W PFC evaluation board

West Coast Magnetics. Advancing Power Electronics FOIL WINDINGS FOR SMPS INDUCTORS AND TRANSFORMERS. Weyman Lundquist, CEO and Engineering Manager

-Thermo-set plastic coated parts can withstand a minimum breakdown voltage of 1000 Vrms, uniformly applied across the 'C' dimension of the toroid.

Solving Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) with Ferrites

MAGNETIC POWDER CORES

TRANSFORMERS PART A. 2. What is the turns ratio and transformer ratio of transformer? Turns ratio = N2/ N1 Transformer = E2/E1 = I1/ I2 =K

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

VDM Magnifer Material Data Sheet No August 2000 Edition

Magnetic Path Length. Outside Dimensions Outer Diameter mm

Optimizing Performance Using Slotless Motors. Mark Holcomb, Celera Motion

Design Considerations

GLOSSARY OF TERMS FLUX DENSITY:

SMD Pulse Transformer for Ethernet Applications. The New Reference LAN Pulse Transformer

Generator Advanced Concepts

Shielded Power Inductors

High-Efficiency Forward Transformer Reset Scheme Utilizes Integrated DC-DC Switcher IC Function

By Gill ( ) PDF created with FinePrint pdffactory trial version

Waveforms for Stimulating Magnetic Cores

SMD Pulse Transformer for Ethernet Applications. The New Reference LAN Pulse Transformer

INVESTIGATION AND DESIGN OF HIGH CURRENT SOURCES FOR B-H LOOP MEASUREMENTS

-Thermo-set plastic coated parts can withstand a minimum breakdown voltage of 1000 Vrms, uniformly applied across the 'C' dimension of the toroid.

Our Position on Quality and the Environment...I.F.C. Introduction...2 Magnetic Properties of Fair-Rite Materials...4 Fair-Rite Materials...

ECONO-PAC /OCTA-PAC OCTA-PAC PLUS Power Inductors and Transformers

Basics of electrical transformer

APPENDIX 4 TYPICAL LAYOUT, VALUES AND CONSTANTS

Properties of Inductor and Applications

High Current Inductor Design for MHz Switching

Lecture 16 Transformer Design

Switching Frequency and Efficiency: A Complex Relationship

Transformers. ELG3311: Habash,

Package and Integration Technology in Point-of-load Converters. Laili Wang Xi an Jiaotong University Sumida Technology

The Benefits of Planar Magnetics in OF Power Conversion

Improvements of LLC Resonant Converter

Solenoid Data Book 1425 Lake Avenue Woodstock, IL Phone: (815) Toll Free: Sales Fax: (815)

Overlooked Loss Mechanisms In Flyback Transformers. Isaac Cohen

EE2022 Electrical Energy Systems

The design of Ruthroff broadband voltage transformers M. Ehrenfried G8JNJ

Inductors & Resonance

eightolives.com QuickApp Toroid Design Copyright 2011 William Kaupinis All Rights Reserved

-Thermo-set plastic coated parts can withstand a minimum breakdown voltage of 1000 Vrms, uniformly applied across the 'C' dimension of the toroid.

Amveco Toroidal Solutions. Acme Electric s class leading toroidal magnetics is the perfect solution for the most challenging applications.

Study of a 3kW High-Efficient Wide-Bandgap DC- DC Power Converter for Solar Power Integration in 400V DC Distribution Networks

Transcription:

Large Kool Mµ Core Shapes Technical Bulletin Ideal for high current inductors, large Kool Mµ geometries (E cores, Toroids, U Cores and Blocks) offer all the advantages of Kool Mµ material, low core loss, excellent performance over temperature, near zero magnetostriction and soft saturation. Typical applications of high current inductors are Uninterruptible Power Supplies (including transformerless UPS), large PFC chokes, traction and inverters for renewable energy (solar/wind/fuel cell conversion). Available in various sizes (see Table 1), Kool Mµ shapes compare favorably with gapped ferrites, powdered iron and silicon steel cores. In addition, for very large core requirements, these large shapes can be configured and bonded into a number of custom designs. Version 2016 Magnetics HEADQUARTERS 110 Delta Drive Pittsburgh PA 15238 USA (p) 1.412.696.1333 1.800.245.3984 magnetics@spang.com www.mag-inc.com MAGNETICS INTERNATIONAL 13/F 1-3 Chatham Road South Tsim Sha Tsui Kowloon, Hong Kong (p) +852.3102.9337 +86.13911471417 asiasales@spang.com www.mag-inc.com.cn

E CORES U CORES BLOCKS toroids TABLE 1 Dimensions (mm) TYPE A B C D E F L M E Cores E5528 DIN 55/21 54.9 27.6 20.6 18.5 37.5 16.8 8.4 10.2 E5530 DIN 55/25 54.9 27.6 24.6 18.5 37.5 16.8 8.4 10.2 E6527 Metric E65 65.2 32.5 27.0 22.1 44.2 19.7 10.0 12.0 E7228 F11 72.4 27.9 19.1 17.7 52.6 19.1 9.5 16.8 E8020 Metric E80 80.0 38.1 19.8 28.0 59.3 19.8 9.9 19.8 E8024 80.0 24.1 29.7 14.0 59.3 19.8 9.9 19.8 E8044 80.0 44.6 19.8 34.4 59.3 19.8 9.9 19.8 LE114 114.3 46.2 34.9 28.6 79.5 35.1 17.2 22.1 LE114HT26 114.3 46.2 26.2 28.6 79.5 35.1 17.2 22.1 See Figure 8 LE130 130.3 32.5 53.9 22.1 108.4 20.0 10.0 44.2 See Figure 8 LE160 160.0 38.1 39.6 28.1 138.2 19.8 9.9 59.3 U Cores U5527 54.9 27.6 16.3 16.7 33.8 10.5 U5529 54.9 27.6 23.2 16.5 33.0 10.5 U6527 65.2 32.5 27.0 22.1 44.2 10.0 U6533 65.2 32.5 20.0 19.6 39.2 12.5 U7236 72.4 35.6 20.9 21.3 43.7 13.9 U8020 80.0 38.1 19.8 28.1 59.3 9.9 U8038 80.0 38.1 23.0 22.4 49.3 15.4 BLOCKS B4741 47.5 41.0 27.5 B5030 50.5 30.3 15.0 B5528 54.9 27.6 20.6 B6030 60.0 30.0 15.0 B7030 70.5 30.3 20.0 B8030 80.5 30.3 20.0 TOROIDS 77191 58.0 25.6 16.2 77111 58.0 34.7 14.9 77615 62.9 31.7 25.9 77735 75.0 44.4 35.9 77868 78.9 48.2 13.9 77908 78.9 48.2 17.1 77102 103.0 55.7 17.9 77337 134.0 77.1 26.8 77165 166.5 101.0 33.2 TABLE 2 A L nh/turn 2 Magnetic Data (±8%) TYPE 26µ A e (mm 2 ) l e (mm) V e (mm 3 ) W A (mm 2 ). PART NUMBER E Cores E5528 116 350 123 43,100 381 00K5528E026 E5530 138 417 123 51,400 381 00K5530E026 E6527 162 540 147 79,400 537 00K6527E026 E7228 130 368 137 50,400 602 00K7228E026 E8020 103 389 185 72,000 1,110 00K8020E026 E8024 210 600 131 78,840 554 00K8024E026 E8044 91 389 208 80,900 1,362 00K8044E026 LE114 235 1220 215 262,000 1,300 00K114LE026 LE114HT26 182 914 215 197,000 1,300 00K114LE026HT26 See Figure 8 LE130 254 1080 219 237,000 1,960 00K130LE026 See Figure 8 LE160 180 778 273 212,000 3,330 00K160LE026 U Cores U5527 67 172 168 28,900 921 00K5527U026 U5529 85 244 168 41,000 921 00K5529U026 U6527 89 270 219 59,100 1,630 00K6527U026 U6533 82 250 199 49,800 1,284 00K6533U026 U7236 87 290 219 63,500 1,545 00K7236U026 U8020 64 195 273 53,200 2,740 00K8020U026 U8038 97 354 237 83,900 1,793 00K8038U026 BLOCKS B4741 N/A * * 53,600 * 00K4741B026 B5030 N/A * * 23,000 * 00K5030B026 B5528 N/A * * 31,200 * 00K5528B026 B6030 N/A * * 27,000 * 00K6030B026 B7030 N/A * * 42,800 * 00K7030B026 B8030 N/A * * 48,800 * 00K8030B026 TOROIDS 77191 60 229 125 28,600 514 0077191A7 77111 33 144 143 20,700 948 0077111A7 77615 82 360 144 51,800 789 0077615A7 77735 88 497 184 91,400 1,550 0077735A7 77868 30 176 196 34,500 1,820 0077868A7 77908 37 221 196 43,400 1,820 0077908A7 77102 48 358 243 86,900 2,470 0077102A7 77337 68 678 324 220,000 4,710 0077337A7 77165 78 987 412 407,000 8,030 0077165A7 2 MAGNETICS www.mag-inc.com *Dependent on design configurations. Contact Magnetics Sales Engineers for assistance.

Materials and DC Bias Large Kool Mµ cores are available in four permeabilities, 14µ, 26µ, 40µ, and 60µ. The magnetic data for each 26µ core is shown on Table 2, page 2. The most critical parameter of a switching regulator inductor material is its ability to provide inductance, or permeability, under DC bias. The chart below (Figure 1) shows the reduction of permeability as a function of DC bias. The distributed air gap of Kool Mµ results in a soft inductance versus DC bias curve. In most applications, this swinging inductance is desirable since it improves efficiency, decreases the volume needed and accommodates a wide operating range. With a fixed current requirement, the soft inductance versus DC bias curve provides added protection against overload conditions. PERMEABILITY VS. DC BIAS Per Unit of initial Permeability DC MAGNETIZING Force (A T/cm) Figure 1 Leakage FLUX Leakage Flux occurs when some of the magnetic field is not contained within the core structure. All transformers and inductors have some amount of leakage flux. In low permeability material the effect is that measured inductance is higher than the inductance calculated using the core parameters (see the equation below). The increase in measured inductance compared with calculated inductance, due to leakage, is strongly affected by the number of turns and the coil design. L =.4 p µ N 2 A e 10-6 I e L = inductance in mh µ = core permeability N = number of turns A e = effective cross section in mm 2 l e = core magnetic path length in mm Core dimensions also affect leakage flux. In the case of an E core, a core with a longer winding length will have less leakage than a core with a shorter winding length. Also, a core with less winding build will have more leakage than a core with more winding build. Magnetics Kool Mµ E cores are tested for inductance factor (A L ) with full, 100 turn coils. External Leakage Field Core shape affects the external leakage field. The E core shape, where most of the core surrounds the winding, has a greater external leakage field than the toroidal shape, where the winding surrounds the core. The external leakage field of the E core shape must be considered when using Kool Mµ E cores or an E core assembly. Kool Mµ E cores should not be assembled with metallic brackets since the leakage flux may cause eddy current heating in the brackets. The leakage field must be considered when laying out the circuit board. Components susceptible to a stray magnetic field should be spaced away from the Kool Mµ E core. For more information on this subject visit Magnetics website to download the white paper, Leakage Flux Considerations on Kool Mμ E Cores. www.mag-inc.com 3

advantages of Kool Mµ compared with gapped ferrite Solutions Are: Soft Saturation: Ferrite must be designed in the safe flat area of the rolloff curve. Powder cores like Kool Mµ are designed to exploit the controlled, partial roll-off in the material (Figure 3). Flux Capacity: With more than twice the flux capacity of ferrite, at a typical 50% roll-off design point, this can result in a 35% reduction in core size. Temperature: Flux capacity of ferrites decreases with temperature while Kool Mµ stays relatively constant. Comparison to Gapped Ferrite Although high grade ferrite core losses are lower than Kool Mµ core losses, ferrite often requires low effective permeability to prevent saturation at high current levels. Ferrite, with its high initial permeability, requires a relatively large air gap to get a low effective permeability. This large air gap results in gap loss, a complex problem which is often overlooked when comparing material loss curves. Simply put, gap loss can drastically increase total losses due to fringing flux around the air gap (Figure 2). The fringing flux intersects the copper windings, creating excessive eddy currents in the wire. The benefits of Kool Mμ include soft saturation, Kool Mμ are designed to exploit the controlled, partial roll-off in the material; they have more than twice the capacity of ferrite; flux capacity stays relatively constant with temperature; Kool Mμ is inherently fault-tolerant and fringing losses do not occur with Kool Mμ (refer to side bar). Gapped ferrite cores do have advantages over Kool Mµ cores. Gapped ferrites typically have a ±3% tolerance on inductance compared to Kool Mµ s ±8%. Gapped ferrites are available in a wider selection of sizes and shapes. Since ferrite material can have a higher gapped effective permeability it is well suited for relatively low bias applications, such as feed forward transformers and low biased inductors. Fault-tolerance: The soft saturation curve makes the Kool Mµ design inherently fault-tolerant, whereas gapped ferrite is not. Fringing Losses: Do not occur with Kool Mµ: can be excessive with gapped ferrites. Kool Mµ Gapped Ferrite Figure 2 PERMEABILITY VS. DC BIAS Per Unit of initial Permeability DC Magnetizing Force (A T/cm) Figure 3 4 MAGNETICS www.mag-inc.com

advantages of Kool Mµ compared WITH POWDERED IRON SOLUTIONS ARE: Core Losses: Kool Mμ offers lower core losses than powdered iron (Figure 4). Near Zero Magnetostriction: Kool Mμ is ideal for eliminating audible frequency noise in filter inductors. Comparison to Powdered Iron Kool Mμ advantages include core losses lower than powdered iron (Figure 4), near zero magnetostriction, and no thermal aging (see sidebar). Kool Mµ, (Al, Si, Fe composition) offers similar DC bias characteristics when compared to powdered iron (pure Fe composition), see Figure 5. In addition to withstanding a DC bias, switching regulator inductors see some AC current, typically at 10 khz to 300 khz. This AC current produces a high frequency magnetic field, which creates core losses and causes the core to heat up. This effect is lessened with Kool Mµ; therefore inductors are more efficient and run cooler. No Thermal Aging: Kool Mμ is manufactured without the use of organic binders. There is no thermal aging whatsoever in Kool Mμ. All coated Kool Mμ toroids are rated for 200 C continuous operation. Uncoated Kool Mμ geometries can theoretically be used up to the Curie temperature of the Kool Mμ material, which is 500 C. CORE LOSS (mw/cm 3 ) Typical core losses (100 khz) FLUX DENSITY (mt) Figure 4 PERMEABILITY VS. DC BIAS Per Unit of initial Permeability DC Magnetizing Force (A T/cm) Figure 5 MAGNETICS www.mag-inc.com 5

Advantages of Kool Mµ compared with silicon STEEL solutions are: Soft Saturation: Silicon blocks have discrete gaps, unlike the distributed gaps of Kool Mµ, so the onset of saturation with increasing current is much sharper. Kool Mµ can be designed deep into the saturation curve, resulting in smaller inductors. Core Losses: Kool Mµ is much lower in core losses than the silicon steel laminations. The difference generally becomes more dramatic as the frequency increases (Figure 7). Comparison to Silicon Steel Kool Mμ offers the benefits of soft saturation, significantly lower core losses, good temperature stability and a lower cost than similar size silicon steel blocks (refer to side bar). Kool Mμ shapes (E cores, U cores and blocks) can be configured for large inductor applications. See Special Designs section on page 8. In comparison, the silicon steel has the advantage of high saturation flux density. Using special grades of silicon steel laminations, in a block or bar geometry, is one approach to realizing large inductors, see Figure 6. Silicon steel block configuration Cost: Kool Mµ cores have a lower cost than similar size silicon steel blocks. Figure 6 Core Loss Comparison 26 permeability kool Mµ vs. silicon steel lamination FIGURE 7 6 MAGNETICS www.mag-inc.com

Core Selection In core selection, the following procedure can be used to determine the core size and number of turns. Only two parameters of the design application must be known: inductance required with DC bias, and the DC current. 1. Compute the product of LI 2, where: L = inductance required with DC bias (mh), I = DC current (amperes). 2. Locate the LI 2 value on the Core Selector Table (Table 3). 3. Inductance and core size are now known. Calculate the number of turns by using the following procedure: TABLE 3 a) The nominal inductance (A L in nh/t 2 ) for the core is obtained from Table 2. Determine the minimum nominal inductance by using the worst-case negative tolerance (-8%). With this information, calculate the number of turns needed to obtain the required inductance in mh by using: N = (L x 10 6 / A L ) 1/2. b) Calculate the bias in A T/cm from: H = NI (with l e in cm). l e c) From the Permeability vs. DC bias curve (Figure 1), determine the roll-off in per unit of initial permeability for the calculated bias level. d) Increase the number of turns by dividing the initial number of turns (from step 3a) by the per unit value of initial permeability. This will yield an inductance close to the required value. A final iteration of turns may be necessary. 4. Choose a wire or foil size and verify that the window fill that results is manufacturable. Duty cycles below 100% allow smaller wire sizes and lower winding factors, but do not allow smaller core sizes. E Cores LI 2 E5528 50-150 E5530 75-150 E6527 150-350 E7228 100-250 E8020 300-500 E8024 400-800 E8044 100-200 LE114 500-1600 LE114HT26 350-1300 LE130 1150-3500 LE160 1500-4500 U Cores LI 2 U5527 150-450 U5529 225-550 U6527 400-1200 U6533 300-850 U7236 350-1100 U8020 450-1500 U8038 500-1600 TOroids LI 2 77191 50-100 77111 50-100 77615 150-225 77735 250-550 77868 100-250 77908 125-325 77102 250-650 77337 650-2250 77165 1250-4250 BLOCKS #BLOCKS LI 2 4741B 8 1225-3000 4741B 16 1450-6000 4741B 24 3670-9000 8030B 4 940-1110 8030B 6 1450-4080 The above table is based on a winding factor of 60% (40% for toroids) and an AC current which is small relative to the DC current. The table is based on the nominal inductance of the chosen core size and a permeability of 26. The current carrying capacity of the wire is 600 A/cm 2. If a core is chosen for use with a large AC current relative to any DC current, such as a flyback inductor, a slightly larger size may be necessary. This will assist in reducing the operating flux density of the AC current that generates core losses. LI 2 values only apply when the blocks are assembled into a structure. For additional assistance refer to the inductor design software on Magnetics website. MAGNETICS www.mag-inc.com 7

Special Designs Many applications require a custom assembly or even a custom core. The material properties of Kool Mµ, and the flexibility of these geometries make the core ideal for custom assembly. Quantity of 8 U6527 cores stacked to make (1) LE130 set A L = 254±8% (26μ) FIGURE 8 Quantity of 4 U8020 cores configured to make (1) LE160 piece A L = 180±8% (26μ) Quantity of 20 b4741 Blocks A L =189±8% (26μ) QuantiTy of 8 B6030 Blocks A L =32±8% (26μ) Assembly ConsiderationS Discrete air gaps between Kool Mµ blocks are not generally needed because the air gap is inherent in the material. At the same time, extremely smooth mating surfaces (such as are employed with ferrites) are not required because the small incidental gap between blocks does not add appreciable extra gap and does not reduce inductance significantly. The adhesives used for assembling blocks generally need to be thicker than those commonly used for ferrite assemblies, since the Kool Mµ surface is rougher and more porous. Magnetics has seen good results with Loctite ESP-109. Cores may require a double application of adhesive to allow for the porosity in the surface of the Kool Mµ blocks. 8 MAGNETICS www.mag-inc.com