ARC FLASH PPE GUIDELINES FOR INDUSTRIAL POWER SYSTEMS

Similar documents
REDUCING ARC FLASH HAZARD BY REMOTE SWITCHING

AN EXAMPLE OF A STANDARD ARC FLASH PPE LABELING STRATEGY

AN EXAMPLE OF A STANDARD ARC FLASH PPE LABELING STRATEGY

STANDARDIZING ARC FLASH PPE LABELS

TRV OVERVIEW FOR REACTANCE LIMITED FAULTS

THE HISTORY OF FLICKER LIMITS

First Draft Language

{40C54206-A3BA D8-8D8CF }

Electrical Arc Hazards

SECTION OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE COORDINATION STUDY

SECTION SHORT CIRCUIT, COMPONENT PROTECTION, FLASH HAZARD AND SELECTIVE COORDINATION STUDY

2018 Consultant s Handbook Division 26 Electrical ARC Flash Hazard Analysis

THREE PHASE PAD MOUNTED DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMER ARC FLASH TESTING JUNE 23, 2009 FERRAZ SHAWMUT HIGH POWER LABORATORY NEWBURYPORT, MA

ADDENDUM NO. 2 PROJECT: COURTLAND PUMP STATION CONTRACT: IFB NO COM.00030

Arc Flash Analysis Training

Topic 6 Quiz, February 2017 Impedance and Fault Current Calculations For Radial Systems TLC ONLY!!!!! DUE DATE FOR TLC- February 14, 2017

Webinar: An Effective Arc Flash Safety Program

Arc Flash Analysis and Documentation SOP

Arc Flash Study Principles & Procedures for below 15 kv AC Systems. Xuan Wu, Dennis Hoffman, Ronald Wellman, and Manish Thakur

NOTICE ER Roland Flood Pumping Station Arc Flash Study

COMMON SOURCES OF ARC FLASH HAZARD IN INDUSTRIAL POWER SYSTEMS

MV ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARD. PART 1: GENERAL 1.01 Transformer

Arc Flash Calculation Methods

SECTION POWER SYSTEMS STUDIES

Selective Coordination for Emergency and Legally-Required Standby Power Distribution Systems

1960 Research Drive, Suite 100, Troy, Michigan with. REVISION: December 10, 2007 (Supersedes previous versions) Prepared by:

ABB AG - EPDS. I S -limiter The worldʼs fastest limiting and switching device

DESIGN STANDARD DS 29

A DUMMIES GUIDE TO GROUND FAULT PROTECTION

Cause, Effect & Mitigation Strategies

Numbering System for Protective Devices, Control and Indication Devices for Power Systems

Arc Flash Hazard and Mitigation 2 nd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle Accelerators June 14 16, 2010

Upgrading Your Electrical Distribution System To Resistance Grounding

3Ø Short-Circuit Calculations

Power System Study for the Pebble #2 Lift Station Las Vegas, Nevada

Protection Basics Presented by John S. Levine, P.E. Levine Lectronics and Lectric, Inc GE Consumer & Industrial Multilin

This document covers common questions concerning the design of an effectively grounded system.

U I. Time Overcurrent Relays. Basic equation. More or less approximates thermal fuse. » Allow coordination with fuses 9/24/2018 ECE525.

ADVANCES IN INDUSTRIAL SUBSTATION DESIGN USING THREE WINDING POWER TRANSFORMERS

Arc Flash Hazard. Can HRG Technology play a role in prevention?

Short Circuit Current Calculations

a) Determine the smallest, standard-sized circuit breaker that should be used to protect this branch circuit.

This section applies to the requirements for the performance of power system studies by both the Design Engineer and the Contractor.

GE Multilin technical note

Education & Training

Ft Worth IEEE-PES. Presented by: Doug Harris Specifications Engineer Dallas, TX. Arc-Flash Hazard Mitigation & Selectivity

ARC FLASH HAZARD ANALYSIS AND MITIGATION

Arc Flash Mitigation An Overview. Gus Nasrallah, P.E. Electroswitch May 30, 2013

IDAHO PURPA GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION REQUEST (Application Form)

thepower to protect the power to protect i-gard LITERATURE Low and medium voltage

Overview of Grounding for Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Presented By Robert Schuerger, P.E.

Design Approaches for Hospital Distribution Systems With Considerations for Future Expansion, Operator Safety, and Cost

The Importance of the Neutral-Grounding Resistor. Presented by: Jeff Glenney, P.Eng. and Don Selkirk, E.I.T.

UPGRADING SUBSTATION RELAYS TO DIGITAL RECLOSERS AND THEIR COORDINATION WITH SECTIONALIZERS

Grounding Recommendations for On Site Power Systems

Capstone Turbine Corporation Nordhoff Street Chatsworth CA USA Phone: (818) Fax: (818) Web:

A Guide to Establish an Arc Flash Safety Program for Electric Utilities

Distance Protection for Distribution Feeders. Presented By: Yordan Kyosev, P.Eng. & Curtis Ruff, P.Eng.

PRC Generator Relay Loadability. Guidelines and Technical Basis Draft 5: (August 2, 2013) Page 1 of 76

Table of Contents. Introduction... 1

Voltage Sag Mitigation by Neutral Grounding Resistance Application in Distribution System of Provincial Electricity Authority

Selection of PPE Practical experience of different arc assessment methods and their comparison

Section 6: System Grounding Bill Brown, P.E., Square D Engineering Services

Distribution System Development & Preliminary Studies

Overcurrent Elements

PRC Generator Relay Loadability. Guidelines and Technical Basis Draft 4: (June 10, 2013) Page 1 of 75

APPLYING LOW-VOLTAGE CIRCUIT BREAKERS TO LIMIT ARC FLASH ENERGY

PREFACE ********************************************************** IT IS NOT INTENDED THAT THESE STANDARDS BE COPIED AND USED AS A SPECIFICATION!

Texas Reliability Entity Event Analysis. Event: May 8, 2011 Loss of Multiple Elements Category 1a Event

Generator Protection GENERATOR CONTROL AND PROTECTION

Electrical PIP ELEGL03 Guidelines for Power Systems Analysis

CHANGEABILITY OF ARC FLASH PARAMETERS AND ITS IMPACT ON HAZARD MITIGATION IN LOW VOLTAGE POWER SYSTEMS

SECTION LOW-VOLTAGE ELECT. DIST. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS _ February 2015 PART I: GENERAL

Effective System Grounding

CHAPTER 2 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM OVERCURRENTS

Optimal neutral ground resistor rating of the medium voltage systems in power generating stations

NATIONAL ELECTRIC SAFETY CODE 2012 EDITION

TABLE OF CONTENT

Notes 1: Introduction to Distribution Systems

Ground Fault Isolation with Loads Fed from Separately Derived Grounded Sources

Reducing the Effects of Short Circuit Faults on Sensitive Loads in Distribution Systems

Bus Protection Fundamentals

The advantages of transformers. EMC-ESD in de praktijk Jan-Kees van der Ven

1

Protection Introduction

Adaptive Autoreclosure to Increase System Stability and Reduce Stress to Circuit Breakers

Thomas Wilkins Wilkins Consulting Henderson Nevada U.S.A.

Power Quality Basics. Presented by. Scott Peele PE

Optimizing HV Capacitor-Bank Design Protection & Testing

NORTH CAROLINA INTERCONNECTION REQUEST. Utility: Designated Contact Person: Address: Telephone Number: Address:

POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS TADP 641 SETTING OF OVERCURRENT RELAYS

Electrical Measurement Safety. Sponsored By:

CONTENTS. 1. Introduction Generating Stations 9 40

How to maximize reliability using an alternative distribution system for critical loads

Operation Analysis of Current Transformer with Transient Performance Analysis Using EMTP Software

Industrial Electrician Level 3

The InterNational Electrical Testing Association Journal. BY STEVE TURNER, Beckwith Electric Company, Inc.

FERRORESONANCE SIMULATION STUDIES USING EMTP

WHITE PAPER. Medium Voltage On-Site Generation Overview. BY MIKE KIRCHNER Technical Support Manager at Generac Power Systems

Transformer Protection

Transcription:

The Electrical Power Engineers Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc. 201 Johnson Road Building #1 Suite 203 Houston, PA 15342-1300 Phone 724-873-9275 Fax 724-873-8910 www.qualtecheng.com ARC FLASH PPE GUIDELINES FOR INDUSTRIAL POWER SYSTEMS For industrial applications in North America and many countries around the world, the key documents with regard to arc flash hazard protection are the following: NFPA 70E Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace 2015 Edition CSA Standard Z462-15 Workplace Electrical Safety IEEE Standard 1584-2002 IEEE Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations Typical PPE levels and the minimum cal/cm 2 rating for each are listed as follows: PPE Level = 0 (1.2 cal/cm 2 ) PPE Level = 3 (25 cal/cm 2 ) PPE Level = 1 PPE Level = 2 (4 cal/cm 2 ) (8 cal/cm 2 ) PPE Level = 4 (40 cal/cm 2 ) The heat produced by the arc is a key factor in determining the appropriate PPE level. The heat is determined predominantly by the magnitude of the fault current and the duration of the fault, as well as how near the person is to the arc. When an arc occurs, the current is less than the maximum possible fault current due to the impedance of the arc. This is illustrated in Figure 1 as calculated in IEEE Standard 1584. The lower the system voltage, the more significant the arc impedance is in reducing the arcing fault current. 120 Arc Fault Current vs Bolted Fault Current As Calculated In IEEE Standard 1584 Grounded or Ungrounded Systems 208V System 100 480V System 600V System 2.4 kv to 13.8 kv Systems Arc Fault Current (ka) 80 60 40 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Bolted Fault Current (ka) Figure 1 This document gives a practical overview of the personal protective equipment (PPE) levels that can be expected in an industrial plant. This analysis uses only the PPE levels of 0, 2, and 4, as is commonly done in many industrial facilities. Arc Flash PPE Guidelines Page 1 Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc.

12.47 KV TO 13.8 KV SYSTEMS Using the equations given in IEEE 1584, curves are given which define the maximum clearing time for a given bolted (or maximum) fault current that would correspond to a PPE level of 2 or 4 for 12.47 kv to 13.8 kv systems. A working distance of 36 is used. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the calculated limits for metal enclosed switchgear for solidly grounded and impedance grounded systems respectively. 12.47 kv to 13.8 kv PPE Requirements - 36" Working Distance - Wye-Grounded System Figure 2 12.47 kv to 13.8 kv PPE Requirements - 36" Working Distance - Ungrounded or Impedance Grounded System Figure 3 Arc Flash PPE Guidelines Page 2 Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc.

Figures 4 and 5 illustrate the calculated limits for open air switchgear for solidly grounded and impedance grounded systems, respectively. 12.47 kv to 13.8 kv PPE Requirements - 36" Working Distance -Open Air Class - Wye-Grounded System Figure 4 12.47 kv to 13.8 kv PPE Requirements - 36" Working Distance - Open Air Class - Ungrounded or Impedance Grounded System Figure 5 Arc Flash PPE Guidelines Page 3 Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc.

2.4 KV AND 4.16 KV SYSTEMS Using the equations given in IEEE 1584, curves are given which define the maximum clearing time for a given bolted (or maximum) fault current that would correspond to a PPE level of 2 or 4 for 2.4 kv and 4.16 kv systems. A working distance of 24 is used in Figures 6 and 7 to illustrate the calculated limits for metal enclosed switchgear for solidly grounded and impedance grounded systems respectively. 2.4 kv & 4.16 kv PPE Requirements - 24" Working Distance - Wye-Grounded System Figure 6 2.4 kv & 4.16 kv PPE Requirements - 24" Working Distance - Ungrounded or Impedance Grounded System Figure 7 Arc Flash PPE Guidelines Page 4 Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc.

Figures 8 and 9 illustrate the calculated limits for a working distance of 36 for 2.4 kv and 4.16 kv systems compared to 24 in Figures 6 and 7. 2.4 kv & 4.16 kv PPE Requirements - 36" Working Distance - Wye-grounded System Figure 8 2.4 kv & 4.16 kv PPE Requirements - 36" Working Distance - Ungrounded or Impedance Grounded System Figure 9 Arc Flash PPE Guidelines Page 5 Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc.

3.0 600 VOLT SYSTEMS Using the equations given in IEEE 1584, curves are given which define the maximum clearing time for a given bolted (or maximum) fault current that would correspond to a PPE level of 2 or 4 for 600 volt systems. A working distance of 18 is used in Figures 10 and 11 to illustrate the calculated limits for metal enclosed switchgear for solidly grounded and impedance grounded systems, respectively. 600 Volt PPE Requirements - 18" Working Distance - Wye-Grounded System 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Figure 10 600 Volt PPE Requirements - 18" Working Distance - Ungrounded or Impedance Grounded System 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Figure 11 Arc Flash PPE Guidelines Page 6 Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc.

4.0 480 VOLT SYSTEMS Using the equations given in IEEE 1584, curves are given which define the maximum clearing time for a given bolted (or maximum) fault current that would correspond to a PPE level of 2 or 4 for 480 volt systems. A working distance of 18 is used in Figures 12 and 13 to illustrate the calculated limits for metal enclosed switchgear for solidly grounded and impedance grounded systems, respectively. 480 Volt PPE Requirements - 18" Working Distance - Wye-Grounded System 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Figure 12 480 Volt PPE Requirements - 18" Working Distance - Ungrounded or Impedance Grounded System 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Figure 13 Arc Flash PPE Guidelines Page 7 Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc.

5.0 208 VOLT SYSTEMS Using the equations given in IEEE 1584, curves are given which define the maximum clearing time for a given bolted (or maximum) fault current that would correspond to a PPE level of 2 or 4 for 208 volt systems. A working distance of 18 is used in Figures 14 and 15 to illustrate the calculated limits for metal enclosed switchgear for solidly grounded and impedance grounded systems, respectively. 208 Volt PPE Requirements - 18" Working Distance - Wye-Grounded System 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Figure 14 208 Volt PPE Requirements - 18" Working Distance - Ungrounded or Impedance Grounded System 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Figure 15 Arc Flash PPE Guidelines Page 8 Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc.

6.0 DIFFERENTIAL AND INSTANTANEOUS RELAYS ON MEDIUM VOLTAGE SYSTEMS In 2.4 kv to 13.8 kv systems the fastest fault clearing times for circuit breakers with conventional relays will result from using differential or instantaneous relays. The arcing time of the fault current in these cases tends to be defined by the following items: Relay Response Time Lockout Relay Response Time (if used) Breaker Opening Time Total Time 1 to 3 cycles 0 to 1 cycle 3 to 5 cycles 4 to 9 cycles The total time could be as fast as 4 cycles and as long as 9 cycles. Using the 9 cycles as a worst case would give a clearing time of 0.15 seconds for a 60 Hz system. Based on the curves in Figures 2 through 9, it is possible to determine a conservative maximum current that would give a PPE = 2 for this voltage range and the 0.15 second clearing time. Some key values are summarized in Table 1. The key points are noted as follows: For a working distance of 36, a PPE = 2 is possible when using differential and instantaneous relays for fault currents up to 30 ka for 2.4 to 13.8 kv systems. For a working distance of 24, a PPE = 2 is possible when using differential and instantaneous relays for fault currents up to 20 ka for 2.4 to 4.16 kv systems. (A working distance of 24 is sometimes appropriate on these lower voltage systems.) With faster clearing times, a PPE = 2 can be achieved for higher fault currents. Table 1 Maximum Fault Currents to Achieve PPE = 2 For Medium Voltage Switchgear Maximum Maximum Bolted Clearing Time for Fault Current Working Arcing Current To Achieve See System kv Distance (Seconds) PPE = 2 (ka) Figures 12.47 to 13.8 36" 0.15 30 2, 3 2.4 to 4.16 24" 0.15 20 6, 7 36" 0.15 30 8, 9 Arc Flash PPE Guidelines Page 9 Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc.

7.0 LOW VOLTAGE BREAKERS When using low voltage breakers, the instantaneous trip on the feeder breakers is typically on the order of 5 seconds. The main breaker is often set with a delay on the order of 0.30 seconds. Based on these typical clearing times, the maximum bolted fault currents are estimated to give PPE = 2 and 4 values for low voltage systems in Table 2 based on the information given in Figures 10 to 15. For example: The main breaker on a 480V system with an arcing fault clearing time of 0.30 seconds can achieve a PPE = 4 for bolted fault currents up to 60 ka for a working distance of 18. If an instantaneous trip can be used with a clearing time of 5 seconds on a 480V system, a PPE = 2 can be achieved for bolted fault currents up to 70 ka. Table 2 Maximum Fault Currents to Achieve PPE = 2 & 4 For Low Voltage Circuit Breakers Maximum Clearing Time for Maximum Bolted Working Arcing Current Fault Current (ka) See System Volts Distance (Seconds) To Achieve PPE PPE Figures 600 18" 5 50 2 10, 11 0.30 40 4 10, 11 480 18" 5 70 2 12, 13 0.30 60 4 12, 13 208 18" 5 100 2 14, 15 0.30 100 4 14, 15 Arc Flash PPE Guidelines Page 10 Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc.

8.0 TYPICAL PPE LEVELS Several examples are given here to illustrate typical PPE levels on industrial power systems due to different protection methods. There can be many variations in the parameters which can result in some variation of the PPE levels which are shown here. Example 1 Figure 16 illustrates a portion of a typical industrial plant configuration, where the incoming voltage is in the range of 1 to 15 kv. Key observations and characteristics are noted as follows: The overcurrent protection on the medium voltage system is coordinated time overcurrent, but there is no differential protection on the main transformer or main bus. The medium voltage main breaker coordinates with the feeder breaker. The feeder breaker has an instantaneous trip, but the main breaker does not. A fuse on the primary of the transformer typically does not limit the PPE to < 4 on the low voltage secondary (i.e. location 5) for transformers of > 1500 kva. For smaller transformers and/or tighter fusing, it is possible to achieve PPE = 4 at this location. A fuse on the main low voltage bus typically would not limit the PPE to < 4 on the main bus (i.e. location 6). If the conductor length from location 7 to location 8 is quite long, the PPE level at location 8 can exceed PPE = 2. Small down-line loads may achieve PPE = 0 (i.e. location 9). Figure 16 Arc Flash PPE Guidelines Page 11 Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc.

Example 2 Figure 17 illustrates a portion of a typical industrial plant configuration, where the incoming voltage is in the range of 1 to 15 kv. Compared to Example 1, low voltage breakers are illustrated instead of low voltage fuses. Key observations and characteristics are noted as follows: A main low voltage breaker can typically achieve PPE = 4 at location 6 if on the main breaker the short time pickup is < 3 and the short time delay is < 0.4 seconds. At location 6, typically PPE = 2, if on the main breaker the instantaneous pickup is < 3; however, this characteristic would not coordinate with the feeder breakers. This setting could be used as a temporary condition to allow some tasks to be done at this lower PPE level, At location 7, typically PPE = 2, if the feeder breaker is equipped with an instantaneous trip characteristic. If it does not have an instantaneous, typically PPE = 4. At location 8, typically PPE = 2, if the feeder breaker is equipped with an instantaneous trip characteristic. If it does not have an instantaneous and location 8 is relatively close to location 7, typically PPE = 4. Small down-line loads may achieve PPE = 0 (i.e. location 9). Figure 17 Arc Flash PPE Guidelines Page 12 Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc.

Example 3 Figure 18 illustrates a portion of a typical industrial plant configuration, where the incoming voltage is in the range of 1 to 15 kv. Compared to Example 2, differential protection is added to the medium voltage main transformer and the main bus. Key observations and characteristics are noted as follows: The faster differential protection, typically results in a PPE = 2 at locations 1 and 2. Figure 18 Arc Flash PPE Guidelines Page 13 Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc.

Example 4 Figure 19 illustrates a portion of a typical industrial plant configuration, where the incoming voltage is in the range of 1 to 15 kv. Compared to Example 3, a digital relay is used in the feeder breaker that has a definite time characteristic with a delay of 0.3 to seconds that would result in the breaker tripping for a fault on the low voltage side of the transformer. Key observations and characteristics are noted as follows: The faster feeder relay typically results in a PPE = 4 at location 5. However, if multiple transformers are fed from the same medium voltage feeder breaker, power would be lost for all of these transformers for a three-phase secondary fault on one of the transformers. Figure 19 Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc. QT-616-0816 201 Johnson Road Building #1 - Suite 203 Houston, PA 15342-1300 724-873-9275 FAX 724-873-8910 www.qualtecheng.com Arc Flash PPE Guidelines Page 14 Qual-Tech Engineers, Inc.