EOSC Governance Development Forum 6 April 2017 Per Öster

Similar documents
A New Platform for escience and data research into the European Ecosystem.

The Research Infrastructures in FP7

Work Programme Fostering the innovation potential of RIs

Research Infrastructures in FP7

Conclusions on the future of information and communication technologies research, innovation and infrastructures

RECOMMENDATIONS. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (EU) 2018/790 of 25 April 2018 on access to and preservation of scientific information

DANUBE INNOVATION PARTNERSHIP

e-infrastructures for open science

Data Infrastructures for Science in the Digital Age

FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES

Research Infrastructures and Innovation

Research Data Alliance Austria

Overview of FP7 activities and perspectives for Horizon Wim Jansen DG CONNECT e-infrastructure

MILAN DECLARATION Joining Forces for Investment in the Future of Europe

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

10246/10 EV/ek 1 DG C II

Position Paper on Horizon ESFRI Biological and Medical Research Infrastructures

CO-ORDINATION MECHANISMS FOR DIGITISATION POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES:

Conclusions concerning various issues related to the development of the European Research Area

LTS of Ris - Action plan - prospects for the future programming period

CERN-PH-ADO-MN For Internal Discussion. ATTRACT Initiative. Markus Nordberg Marzio Nessi

Hamburg, 25 March nd International Science 2.0 Conference Keynote. (does not represent an official point of view of the EC)

Developing Research Infrastructures for 2020 and beyond

Roadmap for European Universities in Energy December 2016

Open access to research data in a European policy context

Scientific Data e-infrastructures in the European Capacities Programme

The PaNOSC Project. R. Dimper on behalf of the Consortium 30 January Photon and Neutron Open Science Cloud

Engaging Stakeholders

Citizens' Observatories & Crowdsourcing Novel ways to engage citizens in science and environmental policy-making

COST FP9 Position Paper

8365/18 CF/nj 1 DG G 3 C

Post : RIS 3 and evaluation

AAI for R&E policy framework

Developing Research Infrastructures for 2020 and beyond

At its meeting on 18 May 2016, the Permanent Representatives Committee noted the unanimous agreement on the above conclusions.

Research Infrastructure Programme

Smart Cities Member States Initiative

SMART DUBAI INSPIRING NEW REALITIES

e-infrastructures in FP7: Call 9 (WP 2011)

Research Infrastructures: Towards FP7

Synergies between the ESIFs and H Research Infrastructures

AI in Europe How could the EC help European society and economy to make the best of this revolution?

Open Science policy and infrastructure support in the European Commission. Joint COAR-SPARC Conference. Porto, 15 April 2015

The Biological and Medical Sciences Research Infrastructures on the ESFRI Roadmap

Mul6lingual Linked Data Technologies for the Single Digital Market

Water, Energy and Environment in the scope of the Circular Economy

Engaging UK Climate Service Providers a series of workshops in November 2014

European Research Infrastructures Framework Programme 7

Scientific information in the digital age: European Commission initiatives

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Digital Transformation Monitor - national initiatives on digitisation of industry

GO FAIR Initiative and GO-TRAIN

Media Convergence and Social Media update from the EC

einfracentral takes one the leading roles in the European Open Science Cloud

Europe s e-infrastructures: The starting blocks for Open Science & Innovation

Rethinking the role of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in Horizon 2020: toward a reflective and generative perspective

MERIL MAPPING OF THE EUROPEAN RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE LANDSCAPE

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. on the evaluation of Europeana and the way forward. {SWD(2018) 398 final}

7656/18 CF/MI/nj 1 DG G 3 C

The role of science, technology and innovation (STI) to foster the implementation of the SDGs

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

Mainstreaming PE in Horizon 2020: perspectives and ambitions

HORIZON Leadership in Enabling and Industrial Technologies (LEIT)

NATIONAL MINISTRIES. GSO Framework for Global Infrastructures G8 + 5

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

Introduction. digitalsupercluster.ca

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of on access to and preservation of scientific information. {SWD(2012) 221 final} {SWD(2012) 222 final}

OPEN SCIENCE & EOSC From Vision to Action Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van Belgie voor Kunsten en Wetenschappen Brussel

Europäischer Forschungsraum und Foresight

Outline. IPTS and the Information Society Unit IPTS Research Agenda on ICT for Governance

Reaction of the European Alliance for Culture and the Arts to the European Commission s proposal for the EU future budget

Roadmap Pitch: Road2CPS - Roadmapping Project Platforms4CPS Roadmap Workshop

Open Science for the 21 st century. A declaration of ALL European Academies

LIVING LAB OF GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH

Access to Research Infrastructures under Horizon 2020 and beyond

The European Commission: Strategies for STI in Europe

The BLUEMED Initiative: RESEARCH AND INNOVATION INITIATIVE FOR BLUE JOBS AND GROWTH IN THE MEDITERRANEAN

IMI Revolutionising Europe s Pharmaceutical Industry. IMI Matters!

Brief presentation of the results Ioana ISPAS ERA NET COFUND Expert Group

ClusterNanoRoad

An ecosystem to accelerate the uptake of innovation in materials technology

Digital Innovation Hubs & Smart Specialisation

Multi-level third space for systemic urban research and innovation

Access to scientific information in the digital age: European Commission initiatives

Experiences from the Social Sciences - possible links to Health Data?

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the

University-University and University-Industry alliances and networks promoting European integration and growth

Developing Research Infrastructures for 2020 and beyond

Interim Evaluation of the European Research Infrastructures including e- Infrastructures in Horizon Report of the Expert Group

FP7 ICT Work Programme

The Value of Membership.

Pan-Canadian Trust Framework Overview

THE ROLE OF TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS IN FOSTERING EXPLOITATION. Josef Mikulík Transport Research Centre - CDV

BSSSC Annual Conference Resolution 2016

SCAR response to the 2 nd Foresight Expert Group Report

Terms of Reference. Call for Experts in the field of Foresight and ICT

International Conference on Research Infrastructures 2014

Research Infrastructures from FP7 to Horizon 2020

Space in the next MFF Commision proposals

" ANNEX 4 HORIZON 2020 WORK PROGRAMME European research infrastructures (including e-infrastructures).."

Transcription:

EOSC Governance Development Forum 6 April 2017 Per Öster per.oster@csc.fi

Governance Development Forum EOSCpilot Governance Development Forum Enable stakeholders to contribute to the governance development A platform for information, dialogue, and development Version 1.1 (EOSCpilot letterhead and formatting) Version 1.0 ( Agreed in WP2 meeting 23 Feb 2017) Background EOSCpilot - European Open Science Cloud for Research Pilot project supports the first phase in the development of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) that the European Commission has launched as stated in their communication of April 19, 2016 to offer Europe's 1.7 million researchers and 70 million science and technology professionals a virtual environment to store, share and re-use their data across disciplines and borders. Once in operation EOSC will make it easier for researchers and innovators to access and re-use data, and will reduce the cost of data storage and high-performance analysis. Making research data openly available can help boost Europe's competitiveness by benefitting startups, SMEs and data-driven innovation, including in the fields of medicine and public health. EOSCpilot is a two-year EC funded project that will establish the governance framework for the EOSC and contribute to the development of European open science policy and best practice. It will develop a number of demonstrators functioning as high-profile pilots that integrate services and infrastructures to show interoperability and its benefits in a number of scientific domains. EOSCpilot will engage with a broad range of stakeholders, crossing borders and communities, to build the trust and skills required for adoption of an open approach to scientific research. These actions will build on and leverage already available resources and capabilities from research infrastructure and e-infrastructure organisations to maximise their use across the research community. Governance Development Forum The main governance challenge of establishing the EOSC is how to construct a framework allowing strong and disparate stakeholders to work together. This framework also needs to address cultural challenges, encouraging the adoption of new ways of working and scientific practices. EOSC pilot will design and trial a stakeholder-driven governance framework with the involvement of all stakeholders including: research communities, research institutions, research infrastructures including e-infrastructures, commercial and non-commercial service providers and research funding bodies. This will then shape and oversee future development of the European Open Science Cloud. The objective of governing the development of EOSC reaches beyond the limits of a project structure. Any approach also needs to take into account the various and specific needs that those scientific communities not yielding the benefits of open science and stakeholders not resourced on the EOSCpilot grant. Only through an inclusive practice the ultimate aim of an EOSC that provides benefits for all scientific communities within the European Research Area can be realised. In order to overcome this challenge EOSC pilot will establish a Governance Development Forum to enable all different stakeholders to contribute to the development of the EOSC governance framework, a work steered by WP2 Governance of the project. The Governance Development Forum is not static, but will grow as the project moves along and the circle of stakeholders widens. The European Open Science Cloud for Research Pilot Project https://b2drop.eudat.eu/s/h9fmylyznhpau7s 2

EOSC Governance EC communication on EOSC governance structure (COM(2016) 178 final): Create a fit-for-purpose pan-european governance structure to federate scientific data infrastructures and overcome fragmentation. The institutional setup will oversee long-term funding, sustainability, data preservation and stewardship. It will build on existing structures to involve scientific users, research funders and implementers* * Such as ESFRI, INSPIRE, eirg, GEANT, PRACE, ELIXIR, the Belmont Forum and similar federating initiatives European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563 3

EOSC Governance Example of basic notion of stakeholder engagement Those groups who can affect or are affected by the achievements of an organization's purpose should be given the opportunity to comment and input into the development of decisions that affect them (Stakeholder Engagement: A Road Map to Meaningful Engagement, Doughty Centre, Cranfield School of Management) European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563 4

EOSCpilot project will establish the governance framework for the EOSC and contribute to the development of European open science policy and best practice; develop a number of pilots that integrate services and infrastructures to demonstrate interoperability in a number of scientific domains; and engage with a broad range of stakeholders, crossing borders and communities, to build the trust and skills required for adoption of an open approach to scientific research The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563 5

WP Governance Objectives To design and trial a stakeholder driven governance framework with the involvement of research communities, research institutions, research infrastructures including e-infrastructures, and research funding bodies, to shape and oversee future development of the European Open Science Cloud. To identify appropriate federated governance model(s) and decision making structure for the EOSC. WP Outputs: D2.4 EOSC as a sustainable ecosystem D2.5 EOSC Rules of Engagement D2.6 Governance framework D2.7 Stakeholder map D2.8 Governance piloting D2.9 Governance Development Board D2.10 Alignment of national investments 6

T2.5 Governance framework piloting process T2.2 Federated governance framework for the EOSC T2.1 Stakeholder Scoping T2.3 Preparatory work for business models to underpin EOSC sustainability T2.4 Leverage of member states investments T2.1.1 Secure active stakeholder engagement for the Governance WP T2.3.1 Investigation and analysis of organisational Rules of Engagement for the EOSC T2.4.1 Creation of an EOSC Funders Summit 0 24 7

How to work with the EOSC Governance Development Forum 8

EOSCpilot Facilitators EOSCpilot Pilots\Exemplars a EOSCpilot Engagement EOSC Implementations b EOSC Engagement Need to distinguish between: a) Stakeholder engagement in the EOSCpilot b) Stakeholder engagement as a driver of the overall governance framework of the EOSC EOSCpilot EOSC

EOSC Governance Development Forum Direct input from stakeholders/members Dialogue, meetings, statements, whitepapers Surveys 10

EOSC impact: How do you foresee EOSC being related to your work? Most respondents foresee big impact for EOSC. Answers mainly highlight a) opportunities, b) gaps/warnings and c) EOSC influence on other initiatives. Some examples: -EOSC will most likely be a strong policy body through its governance framework. Data is central in all research infrastructures but it is not yet clear how EOSC and RDA will collaborate. -EOSC will provide the larger (but hopefully light-weight) governance context for (GO)FAIR initiative. (GO)FAIR implementations intend to follow EOSC recommendations -Bringing the existing European e-infrastructures at the centre of the evolution of the ecosystem and of the future governance of EOSC will not correspond to the expectations by the largest scientific communities for the future. 11

EOSCpilot WP2 & EC plans European Commission statements for summit EOSC summit June 9 /12 2017 Outco mes EOSC roadmap Oct / Dec 2017 Roadmap to MS discussion, council & parliament review M1 M6 M8 M10 M13 M15 M22 EOSCpilot 1 st Gov Dev Forum (WP2 July 2017 First EOSCpilot Funders Summit (WP2 Feb 2018) 2nd Gov Dev Forum (WP2 Nov 2017 3rd Gov Dev Forum (WP2 May 2018 Second EOSCpilot Funders Summit (WP2 Oct 2018) M24 First Funder Institutions & Intermediaries Workshop (WP8 Aug 2017) EOSCpilot First Stakeholder Engagement Event (WP8 Nov 2017) Second Funder Institutions & Intermediaries Workshop (WP8 Apr 2018) EOSCpilot Second Stakeholder Engagement Event (WP8 - Oct 2018) 2 EOSCpilot Service Provider Workshops (WP5 -???) 4 Skills Workshops (training & requirements) (WP7 -???) 4 Industry Stakeholder Workshops (WP8 -???) 2 Scientific Community Workshops (WP8 -???) 12

Results of the questionnaire - Ways to engage stakeholders in the development of the EOSC governance framework

Target group of the questionnaire Participants from three EOSC stakeholder workshops in 2015 and 2016: - 30 November 2015, Brussels: organised by HLEG EOSC to discuss the challenges and possible solutions for EOSC. - 5 Feb 2016, Rome: organised by EUDAT, EGI, OpenAIRE, GÉANT, and LIBER to understand the roles of e-infrastructures and RIs in EOSC. - 29 June 2016, Brussels: organised by EC for Member State representatives to discuss preparation of a roadmap outlining the governance and funding of EOSC. Questionnaire sent to 68 respondents - 21 responses. Respondents mainly represented RIs followed by e- Infrastructures. Funding Bodies the least represented. 14

Main objective of the questionnaire Get a head start of the Governance Development Forum by building on thoughts and views from people already involved in the planning and development of EOSC Find out efficient ways to involve stakeholders in the EOSC governance framework development Learn about the participants thoughts on the workshop topics 15

Participants thoughts on workshop topics: - most useful topic for the development of EOSC Answers indicate quite different drivers and motivations for different stakeholders. Some examples of most useful workshop topics: -The importance and the role of the RIs was more clearly understood and stated -Sensitive data management and sharing, stakeholder engagement when dealing with sensitive data -Issues related to the procurement. Synergies between RIs and e- Infrastructures -The workshop highlighted quite a diversity in perception on the actual scope of EOSC, in particular between e-infrastructures and other research infrastructures -In order to turn the EOSC vision into a working implementation, we need to embed the practical advice of repository managers, IT service operators and researchers in the governance and operation 16

Ways to involve stakeholders in EOSC governance development Answers indicate similar main steps for stakeholder involvement: a) identify key stakeholder groups b) engage in targeted dialogue c) give clear and specific roles to each stakeholder on issues that concern them Example of answers: -The different stakeholder groups need to be clearly identified and engaged with agreed commitments and incentives for participation. Regular EOSC focused meetings between the stakeholders and DGs RTD, CNECT and GROW should be organised. -It will never be possible to get all different kind of stakeholder under the same "umbrella". Enable a working relation and communication channel between the different stakeholder layers, as it will never be possible to have one governance body consisting of researchers and funders! 17

EOSC impact: How do you foresee EOSC being related to your work? Most respondents foresee big impact for EOSC and highlight: a) opportunities b) gaps/warnings c) EOSC influence on other initiatives. Examples of answers: -EOSC will most likely be a strong policy body through its governance framework. Data is central in all RIs but it is not yet clear how EOSC and RDA will collaborate. -Bringing the existing European e-infrastructures at the centre of the evolution of the ecosystem and of the future governance of EOSC will not correspond to the expectations by the largest scientific communities for the future. - EOSC will provide the larger (but hopefully light-weight) governance context for (GO)FAIR initiative. (GO)FAIR implementations intend to follow EOSC recommendations 18

Open questions Is there (still) a big diversity in perception on the actual scope of EOSC? Can a common understanding of EOSC still embrace different and even conflicting expectations about EOSC among stakeholders? What level of engagement from different stakeholders should be considered good enough for EOSC governance development? Is it enough to be given the opportunity to influence? 19

Next steps Surveys Monthly web meetings Website Collect statements and whitepapapers EGDF Meetings The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & 20

Thanks! Next EGDF webinar 4 May 14:00 CEST 21