Website Effectiveness Survey Review of Findings October 29, 2012

Similar documents
CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

STRATEGIC UX (STRUX) HOW TO DERIVE A PRODUCT USERS WILL LOVE WHILE KEEPING YOUR STAKEHOLDERS HAPPY. April 15, Strategic UX (STRUX)

Enfield CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Oxfordshire CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Southern Derbyshire CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

South Devon and Torbay CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report Version 1 Internal Use Only

Portsmouth CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Community Pharmacy Patient Questionnaire Results for Miltons Chemists

West Norfolk CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 7 Internal Use Only

Article. The Internet: A New Collection Method for the Census. by Anne-Marie Côté, Danielle Laroche

Sutton CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

An Exploration of How Technology Use Influences Outdoor Recreation Choices

REPORT ON THE EUROSTAT 2017 USER SATISFACTION SURVEY

2. Overall Use of Technology Survey Data Report

There are officially more mobile devices than people in the world

Customer Satisfaction Report

Seizing Opportunity In The Upturn: Will Emerging Trends Boost Your Business?

6,000+ ABI Community Survey Key Findings. For more information, visit: beltline.org/2018survey AUGUST satisfied

NHS NORTH & WEST READING CCG Latest survey results

Social Gaming Network. Software Engineering I Dr Mahmoud Elish Requirements Engineering Report

The State of Food Blogging March 2012 Part I: The Bloggers. How would you classify yourself as a Food Blogger?

Enfield CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Sutton CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

DoIT Computing Survey 2017 Main Report

GOVERNING BOARD. 360 Stakeholder Survey Report. Date of Meeting 17 May 2017 Agenda Item No 9. Title

Iowa Research Online. University of Iowa. Robert E. Llaneras Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Blacksburg. Jul 11th, 12:00 AM

THE STATE OF UC ADOPTION

AFRICAN UNION HARMONIZED FISHING VESSEL REGISTER AN INSTRUCTION MANUAL

U.S. Document Imaging Scanner Survey Report: 2007

Eastern Cheshire CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

Infographic: Google Search Prevalence by State

DIGITAL MARKETING CHECKLIST. for. Home Remodelers & Builders

Kernow CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

STAFF REPORT INFORMATION ONLY

EFFECTIVE WEBSITES WHAT IS AN EFFECTIVE WEBSITE?

MidtownCES. Occupant Survey Report. Survey Dates: 4/4/2011 through 5/10/2011. Center for the Built Environment University of California, Berkeley

Figure 1: When asked whether Mexico has the intellectual capacity to perform economic-environmental modeling, expert respondents said yes.

2012 IELTS test in Australia Writing part (General Training)

NHS SUTTON CCG Latest survey results

Online Marketing Analysis Prepared For:

Reality in Maps. Solutions for Innovative Destination Marketing

PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY ON METALS MINING IN GUATEMALA Executive Summary

Have Your Say. Key insights from public engagement in 2016

Subjective Evaluation Survey

SURVEY ON USE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT)

Focus Group Participants Understanding of Advance Warning Arrow Displays used in Short-Term and Moving Work Zones

WHAT IS FEATURED AUTHORS?

RISE OF THE HUDDLE SPACE

Final Report of the Subcommittee on the Identification of Modeling and Simulation Capabilities by Acquisition Life Cycle Phase (IMSCALCP)

NHS BATH AND NORTH EAST SOMERSET CCG Latest survey results

Digital Government Imperatives of the United Arab Emirates: 92% of Emirati Respondents Believe Online Government Services Have Improved Since 2014

WHAT CLICKS? THE MUSEUM DIRECTORY

Experiences from a Living Lab trialling a mobile participation platform

Introduction. Data Source

Heredis may assign any number of information sources to each event.

THE ATTITUDES OF ENTREPRENEURS AND MANAGERS REGARDING THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN ALBANIAN TOURISM ENTERPRISES ABSTRACT

Taylor & Francis journals Canadian researcher survey 2010

Swindon CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

Southwark CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

Chitika Insights The Value of Google Result Positioning

10 WAYS TO REACH BOOMERS ON FACEBOOK

Questionnaire Design with an HCI focus

Trafford CCG. CCG authorisation 360 o stakeholder survey report. Version 18 Internal Use Only Version 14 Internal Use Only

Service User Out Of Hours Satisfaction Survey Your views and suggestions are important and help us to improve our services!

Rushcliffe CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

1997 Annual Surveys of Journalism & Mass Communication Survey of Enrollments Survey of Graduates

Norfolk State University

01. , 02. letter, 03. essay, 04. article, 05. leaflet, 06. review, 07. report, 08. story

Computer programs for genealogy- a comparison of useful and frequently used features- presented by Gary Warner, SGGEE database manager.

Rubber Hand. Joyce Ma. July 2006

C 2 A L L Y O U R P A R T N E R I N U S E R E X P E R I E N C E

CCG 360 stakeholder survey 2017/18 National report NHS England Publications Gateway Reference: 08192

9 th World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Meeting (WTIM-11) Mauritius, 7-9 December 2011

Public Perceptions Survey on. Extractive Industries

A Step by Step guide to making and maintaining a Universal Credit claim online

THE REAL PANDORA STORY. Liz\Internet & Satellite Radio\Pandora\Radio and Pandora R LA

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

Executive Summary. Questions and requests for deeper analysis can be submitted at

Collaborative Research and Mapping for Public Transit Anywhere

DIGITAL GOVERNMENT TRANSFORMATION

Phase Shifters and DC ties in the IDC

FOOD LITERACY ATTITUDE AND AWARENESS RESEARCH REPORT

Why Google Result Positioning Matters

Requests for Reconsideration of Library Materials 2011 Annual Report

Science Impact Enhancing the Use of USGS Science

The Morton Arboretum Photographic Society

Introducing the Calgary Public Library Foundation

End User Awareness Towards GNSS Positioning Performance and Testing

CAS Section 7 Facilities/Technology/Equipment Team member comments and recommendation

STUDY OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC S PERCEPTION OF MATERIALS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER. A study commissioned by the Initiative Pro Recyclingpapier

Resource Review. In press 2018, the Journal of the Medical Library Association

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Should privacy impact assessments be mandatory? David Wright Trilateral Research & Consulting 17 Sept 2009

Intel Research: Global Innovation Barometer

Flexibility in Use. Fiskars Considers Variety of Customer Ages and Abilities. Case Studies on Universal Design Case 2/Principle Two

Vermont Bar Association Seminar Materials

Laser App Integration User Guide

A survey of cultural impacts that invasive species have on people in the St. Lawrence and Eastern Lake Ontario region of New York State

How To Set Up Scoring In Salsa

Are you ready for a new website?

Transcription:

Website Effectiveness Survey 2012 Review of Findings October 29, 2012

Table of Contents Objectives & Methodology Executive Summary Detailed Findings: Visitors Detailed Findings: Non-Visitors

Objectives To support its mission of raising awareness of recreational fishing and boating and increasing participation in these activities, the Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation (RBFF) developed the Take Me Fishing campaign. A key element of the campaign is the website, www.takemefishing.org. RBFF partnered with Strategic Marketing & Research, Inc. (SMARI) to conduct research to evaluate the site s effectiveness. The primary goals of the research were to: Gauge the website s impact on visitors behavior did the site influence visitors to begin fishing or boating? Did it prompt them to increase their engagement in these activities? Understand how and why people accessed the site when planning a trip or while already on the water? To research regulations or find out where the fish are biting? Measure the differences between those who use the site and those who do not, in order to expand the site s visibility and satisfaction among a broader scope of users. 3

Methodology Visitors Website visitors / Fishington members: online surveys were conducted with members of the RBFF database of those who are enrolled in the Fishington online fishing/boating community, and prior visitors to the TakeMeFishing.org site who were captured while on the RBFF website (meaning that they responded to an invitation to participate in the survey; the invitation appeared on the site itself). These individuals were asked about their outdoor activities and about their experiences with the website. Visitors Surveys Fishington database 956 Captured website visitors 324 Total 1,280 4

Methodology Non-visitors Non-visitors / Target segments: online surveys were conducted with people who had not visited TakeMeFishing.org before. This group was asked about outdoor activities, and then directed to the website and asked to explore it. They were then asked to evaluate that initial experience with TakeMeFishing.org. Non-visitor Sample Surveys Family Outdoors 373 Outdoor Enthusiasts 196 Total 569 This year s methodology represents a departure from previous years in that this non-visitor sample was screened to ensure that it included only the two segments shown above. By contrast, previous non-visitor samples were only limited to those with an interest in fishing and boating, and included others outside of these segments. This change in methodology should be considered in evaluating the results. We would expect the change in methodology to result in more favorable findings, or at least findings more consistent with those of the Visitor group. 5

Methodology Verbatim responses One function of asking respondents to give their opinions in open-ended questions is to gather nuanced information that helps flesh out the story we find in the data. Oftentimes when asked to share their opinions in an open-ended format, consumers give a mix of positive and negative feedback. Coding such responses as a single entry can be misleading, because a portion of the information gets left out. Therefore, we coded verbatim responses individually counting each portion of the response as a separate entry to enable analysis of the often complex statements that can include both praise and constructive criticism. As a result, even among those who are satisfied with the site and its elements, some comments may seem more negative. However, in our experience, this approach is the best way to gain the richest possible understanding of the verbatim comments. 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The website is reaching the target segments. One overwhelmingly positive take-away from this research is that the website is already capturing the target segments. The graphs below illustrate that while these segments represent less than 20% of the general population, they make up 70% of the population of TakeMeFishing.org users. General Population Visitors Family Outdoors 11% Outdoor Enthusiasts 8% Outdoor Excitement 8% Family Outdoors 41% Outdoor Excitement 3% Dabblers 25% Non-Target 39% Outdoor Enthusiasts 38% Non-Target 5% Affable Adventurers 6% Affable Adventurers 9% Dabblers 7% 8

Overall satisfaction improved this year among visitors; non-visitors this year were also more satisfied than last year s visitors. Experience and content metrics improved over 2011 as well. Experience How would you rate your overall satisfaction with TakeMeFishing.org? (Very satisfied and somewhat satisfied shown) How would you rate your experience with TakeMeFishing.org? (Excellent and good shown) Was not reported for non-visitors in 2011 75% 78% 82% 83% 83% 86% How satisfied were you with the site's USEFULNESS? (Very and somewhat satisfied shown) 78% 84% 82% Content How satisfied were you with the site being EASY TO UNDERSTAND? (Very and somewhat satisfied shown) 84% 83% 86% 86% How satisfied were you with the site's UP-TO-DATE/CURRENT CONTENT? (Very and somewhat satisfied shown) 75% 78% 78% 81% How satisfied were you with the site MEETING YOUR INFORMATION NEED? (Very and somewhat satisfied shown) 76% 77% 79% How satisfied were you with the site being CREDIBLE? (Very and somewhat satisfied shown) 78% 78% 82% 85% Visitors 2011 Visitors 2012 Non 2011 Non 2012 9

Visitors and non were very positive about the site s functionality and layout, with most measures either improving or remaining constant from 2011. There may have been an issue with broken links for visitors, however. Functionality How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the site's PAGE LOAD SPEED? (Very satisfied and somewhat satisfied shown) 81% 83% How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the site's SEARCH RESULT SPEED? (Very satisfied and somewhat satisfied shown) 74% 81% 82% How would you rate your overall satisfaction with who well the site's LINKS WORKED? (Very satisfied and somewhat satisfied shown) 79% 82% 81% 83% How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the site's AVAILABILITY? (Very satisfied and somewhat satisfied shown) 81% 82% 84% 84% How would you rate the site's SEARCH FUNCTION? (Excellent and good shown) 75% 78% Layout How would you rate the site's NAVIGATION OR MENU STRUCTURE? (Excellent and good shown) 78% 82% 83% How difficult was it to find the items and information of most interest to you on TakeMeFishing.org? (Very and somewhat easy shown) Visitors 2011 74% 81% Visitors 2012 Non 2011 Non 2012 10

Website visitors / Fishington members Among visitors, fishing tops boating for topics researched, but this year saw increased activity in all areas, suggesting that website users rely on TakeMeFishing.org for a variety of outdoor sporting inquiries. Website visitors are looking for specific ways to make their fishing outings more successful where to go, what gear to use, what the regs are. Evaluation of the changes should also be considered in light of changes that were made to the site that may have promoted usage. Q6. What were you looking for on TakeMeFishing.org? Where to fish General interest What bait/tackle to use State fishing regulations and rules New equipment or tackle How to fish State fishing license Child friendly fishing/boating info Boating regulations and rules Fishing/boating charters Conservation Where to boat Boating safety Boat registration How to boat 20% 14% 21% 11% 20% 7% 17% 11% 16% 10% 15% 8% 14% 7% 7% 21% 17% Was not reported in 2011 as it was less than 6% Was not reported in 2011 as it was less than 6% 25% 26% 29% 29% 38% 43% 48% 54% 47% 45% 2011 2012 64% 11

Website visitors / Fishington members Internet search, which was already the main traffic driver, saw a 60% increase over 2011. The other driver that increased significantly this year is the Anglers Legacy program. How did you first learn about TakeMeFishing.org? 37% Internet search Clicked through from another website Online ad or web banner 23% 20% 19% 19% 19% 19% 18% 18% 17% 17% 15% 15% 13% 13% 13% 12% 11% 11% 11% 10% 9% 9% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 5% 3% 2% 2% Email Anglers' Legacy Magazine Friends and/or family Television Mailing/something I received in the mail Radio Newspaper 2009 2010 2011 2012 12

Website visitors / Fishington members As in previous measures, visitors are generally very positive about the site. Overall satisfaction and overall experience are positive. Very few have negative reactions to key measures. Two-thirds found what they were looking for easily, but the other one-third who either had to search more or never found everything they wanted may account for the more neutral responses to How well did TakeMeFishing.org measure up to your expectations? Key Measures 2% 1% 1% 3% 3% 14% 12% 16% 27% Did you find what you were looking for on TakeMeFishing.org? 33% 55% 50% 38% Yes, but it took some time 19% 51% 31% Overall satisfaction Overall experience Expectations Ease of finding info *Very satisfied *Excellent *Exceeded expectations *Very easy Somewhat satisfied Good 2 Somewhat easy Neither satisfied, nor dissatisfied Neutral 3 Neutral Somewhat dissatisfied Poor 4 Somewhat difficult Very dissatisfied Very Poor Failed to meet expectations Very difficult 20% 43% Yes, easily 63% I found some of what I was looking for, but not everything 16% No, not at all 2% 13

Non-visitors / Target segments After being provided with the TakeMeFishing.org url and asked to explore the site, non-visitors were asked what they looked at. Non-visitors mainly look for info on where to fish and boat, and general interest information to get a feel for what is available. Q8. What information did you wind up looking at during your visit? Where to fish General interest Where to boat State fishing regulations and rules State fishing license What bait/tackle to use Boating regulations and rules How to fish Conservation Boat registration Child friendly fishing/boating info New equipment or tackle Boating Safety Fishing/boating charters How to boat 25% 25% 22% 19% 15% 15% 13% 13% 13% 12% 10% 8% 36% 46% 59% 14

Non-visitors / Target segments After exploring the site, non-visitors were asked to give their initial impressions of the website. 15

Non-visitors / Target segments Although fewer non-visitors gave top-box* positive responses than visitors did, their top-two-box feedback on key measures was still overwhelmingly positive. More nonvisitors this year have fishing licenses, likely a function of the targeted methodology. Perhaps because of their lack of experience with the website and therefore lack of expectations, non-visitors report the site did a better job of meeting/exceeding their expectations than visitors did. Each of these measures Key Measures is on par with last year. Initial experience is 2% 5% 1% 4% 3% 5% 1% 6% 11% 12% 13% actually even more 17% positive this year than 21% in 2011, climbing 23% 39% from to 83%. 37% Non-visitors with current fishing license 37% 49% 60% 61% 44% 39% 57% 2010 2011 2012 Top 2 box Overall satisfaction Initial experience Expectations Ease of finding info *Very satisfied *Excellent *Exceeded expectations *Very easy Somewhat satisfied Good 2 Somewhat easy Neither satisfied, nor dissatisfied Neutral 3 Neutral Somewhat dissatisfied Poor 4 Somewhat difficult Very dissatisfied Very Poor Failed to meet expectations Very difficult 16