: Different Countries, Common Approaches Bilal Succar, PhD Director, BIMexcellence.com Mohamad Kassem, PhD Senior Lecturer + Enterprise Fellow, Teesside University
2 this presentation is in Two Parts: 1 Understanding BIM Policy Challenges and how to address them (3 sections) 2 Developing a BIM Policy Roadmap case study and sample template (2 sections)
3 Part I BIM Policy Challenges what are they and how to address them (in 3 sections)
4 The main BIM Policy Challenges: Lack of Lack of Lack of Decision Support Methods and Tools to assist Policy Makers in policy development Benchmarks to assess and comparing whole markets Clarity of published BIM documents, their contents and current relevance
5 How to address these BIM Policy Challenges? Through Through Through (a) Identifying existing or generating new Models for policy development (b) Collecting Data to benchmark and compare markets (c) Organising Knowledge so it can be used more efficiently
6 Part I S e c t i o n A addressing Policy Development Challenges through conceptual Models for Policy Development Since there are no existing models that can be applied, we had to develop five new ones
7 Macro Adoption Models
8 Model A: the Diffusion Areas Model clarifies how to measure the Extent of BIM Diffusion across markets 9 metrics: achieved by overlaying BIM Fields (or topics) BIM Technologies BIM Processes BIM Policies with BIM Capability Stages Modelling collaboration integration Model available in other languages Video available on the BIM Framework Channel
9 Model B: the Macro Maturity Components clarifies how to measure BIM Maturity across markets model includes 8 components: Objectives, Stages & Milestones; Champions & Drivers; Regulatory Framework; Noteworthy Publications; Learning & Education; Measurements & Benchmarks Standardised Parts & Deliverables; and Technology Infrastructure Model available in other languages Video available on the BIM Framework Channel
10 Model C: The Diffusion Dynamics model clarifies How BIM Diffuses across markets it includes: 3 Diffusion Dynamics: Top-Down Middle-Out Bottom-Up 3 Pressure Mechanisms: Downwards Upwards Horizontal 3 Pressure Types: Coercive Normative Mimetic
11 Model D: The Policy Actions model clarifies how policy makers - in different markets - may have very different approaches to the same set of activities: The model identifies 9 Policy Actions by: overlaying Police Approaches Passive Active Assertive with Policy Activities Make Aware Encourage Observe
12 Model E: The Diffusion Responsibilities model clarifies the different BIM Diffusion Roles played by stakeholders 9 player groups: Policy Makers Educational Institutions Construction Organizations Individual Practitioners Technology Developers Technology Service Providers Industry Associations Communities of Practice Technology Advocates
13 Part I S e c t i o n B addressing Policy Development Challenges through collecting Data to benchmark and compare markets Since there are no research-based benchmarks that can be depended upon, we had to collect our own data
14 Data collection Sample Size 20 Countries 95 Experts Country No. Country No. Australia 4 Netherlands 4 China 3 Portugal 9 Finland 5 Qatar 6 Hong Kong 3 Russia 2 Malaysia 4 Spain 7 New Zealand 3 Switzerland 2 Brazil 4 UAE 3 Ireland 3 United Kingdom 16 Italy 5 USA 5 Mexico 3 South Korea 4 Data collected Nov -Dec 15
15 Diffusion Areas All 9 Metrics sample countries Model A
16 Macro Maturity All 8 Components sample countries Model B
17 Macro Maturity Objectives, Stages and Milestones Component 1 of 8 - sample countries Model B
18 Diffusion Dynamics Sample countries BY majority response Model C
19 Policy Actions sample countries Model D Policy Action types in 13 countries (65% - AU, MY, NZ, BR. IT, PT, QA, RU, ES, SZ, AE) is currently: Make Aware Encourage Observe Policy Action types in 1 country (Netherlands) is currently: Educate Incentivise Observe
20 Policy Actions sample countries Model D Policy action types in 5 countries (20% - China, Finland, Hong Kong, US, South Korea) is currently: Educate Encourage Observe Policy Action types in 1 country (United Kingdom) is currently: Educate Enforce Track
21 Stakeholder Responsibilities sample countries Model E
22 Stakeholder Responsibilities sample countries Model E
23 Part I S e c t i o n C addressing Policy Development Challenges through Organising Knowledge so it can be used more efficiently There are no existing taxonomies for organising BIM publications, identifying what s available and what needs to be developed, so we had to develop a new taxonomy
24 Noteworthy BIM Publications Knowledge Content Taxonomy http://www.bimframework.info/ papers.html#paperb1 G U I D E S P R OTO C O L S M A N DAT E S Best Practice Case Study Framework or Model Guideline Learning Module or Material Report Strategy or Vision Taxonomy or Classification Metric or Benchmark Manual Plan Procedure or workflow Protocol or Convention Specification or Prescription Standard or Code Contract or Agreement Programme or Schedule Requirement and Rules
25 Noteworthy BIM Publications Document Review & Analysis 2013 Data for reference only Guides Protocols Mandates United States 43% 24% 33% United Kingdom 53% 35% 12% Netherlands 57% 29% 14% Singapore 40% 40% 20% Norway 67% 17% 17% Finland 57% 29% 14% Denmark 43% 43% 14% Australia 64% 36% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
26 Noteworthy BIM Publications Identifying their current Relevance http://www.bimframework.info/20 15/01/relevance-metric.html
27 Part II Developing a BIM Policy Roadmap case study and sample template (in 2 sections)
28 Part II S e c t i o n A Brazil case study
29 Norway Finland Netherlands United Kingdom Brazil France
30 Norway Finland Netherlands United Kingdom Brazil France Model B Macro Maturity Components - Component IV: Noteworthy BIM Publications note: data from 2013 (for reference only)
31 Macro Maturity Components All components note: data from 2013 (for reference only)
32 Developing a BIM Diffusion Roadmap for Brazil FIESP, Sau Paulo Download report from: http://sectordialogues.org/sites/defa ult/files/acoes/documentos/bim.pdf
33 Part II S e c t i o n B a simple and generic roadmap based on Model B
34
35
Sample BIM Roadmap v0.2 2017 2018 2019 2020 20xx Objectives, Stages & Milestones Establish basic strategic objectives Define min capability requirements for projects of Type X Define minimum capability requirements and project deliverables for all other types and sizes of projects Champions & Drivers Establish a high-level task group to develop a national strategy Establish mid-level, regional or specialised satellite task groups to implement the national strategy and develop detailed protocols Dissolve all regional satellite groups and encourage the formation of specialised Communities of Practice (CoP)s Regulatory Framework Develop a framework that encourages process innovation, early involvement of contractors and integrated project delivery Conduct pilot projects using the new framework. Refine the framework and establish a strategy for its market-wide adoption Mandate the use of the new regulatory framework Noteworthy Publications Establish a list of noteworthy publications to be developed Develop the development of the first set of guides, protocols and mandates that facilitate BIM adoption across the market Develop or coordinate the development of a set of standards that regulate the quality of project deliverables across the supply chain Learning & Education Develop a competency inventory, educational framework, and learning modules. Conduct awareness sessions across the supply chain Develop learning modules for tertiary, vocational, and professional settings. Encourage the development of e-learning material covering all disciplines and roles. Educate the educators. Measurements & Benchmarks Develop metrics for assessing and prequalifying the capability of organizations and the competency of individuals Develop a market-wide benchmark for project performance. Develop a performance pre-qualification framework Establish a market pre-qualification register Standardised Parts & Deliverables Develop a protocol for standardized components Generate standardized components for most-used architectural, structural and mechanical elements. Technology Infrastructure Develop a protocol for min hardware specifications Develop a protocol for common data environments (for exchanging files and data) Develop a protocol for a whole life-cycle, integrated-data environment (covering all documents, models and data) 36 Bilal Succar & Mohamad Kassem 18-19 Feb, 2016 European BIM Summit Barcelona, Spain
37 Thank You!
Dr. Mohamad Kassem Enterprise Fellow, Teesside University email: m.kassem@tees.ac.uk Dr. Bilal Succar Director, BIMexcellence.com email: bsuccar@bimexcellence.com