SP 22.3: A 12mW Wide Dynamic Range CMOS Front-End for a Portable GPS Receiver

Similar documents
THERE is large enthusiasm in the consumer market for

CHAPTER 4 ULTRA WIDE BAND LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER DESIGN

Designing a 960 MHz CMOS LNA and Mixer using ADS. EE 5390 RFIC Design Michelle Montoya Alfredo Perez. April 15, 2004

Chapter 6. Case Study: 2.4-GHz Direct Conversion Receiver. 6.1 Receiver Front-End Design

CHAPTER 3 CMOS LOW NOISE AMPLIFIERS

Design of a Low Noise Amplifier using 0.18µm CMOS technology

A 900MHz / 1.8GHz CMOS Receiver for Dual Band Applications*

Fully integrated CMOS transmitter design considerations

Lecture 20: Passive Mixers

Design of a Low Power 5GHz CMOS Radio Frequency Low Noise Amplifier Rakshith Venkatesh

CMY210. Demonstration Board Documentation / Applications Note (V1.0) Ultra linear General purpose up/down mixer 1. DESCRIPTION

RF Integrated Circuits

THERE is currently a great deal of activity directed toward

Radio-Frequency Conversion and Synthesis (for a 115mW GPS Receiver)

Quadrature GPS Receiver Front-End in 0.13μm CMOS: The QLMV cell

760 IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS, VOL. 37, NO. 6, JUNE A 0.8-dB NF ESD-Protected 9-mW CMOS LNA Operating at 1.23 GHz

THE rapid growth of portable wireless communication

RFIC DESIGN EXAMPLE: MIXER

PART MAX2605EUT-T MAX2606EUT-T MAX2607EUT-T MAX2608EUT-T MAX2609EUT-T TOP VIEW IND GND. Maxim Integrated Products 1

An Asymmetrical Bulk CMOS Switch for 2.4 GHz Application

Low-Noise Amplifiers

433MHz front-end with the SA601 or SA620

RF CMOS 0.5 µm Low Noise Amplifier and Mixer Design

Design and Simulation Study of Active Balun Circuits for WiMAX Applications

Dual-band LNA Design for Wireless LAN Applications. 2.4 GHz LNA 5 GHz LNA Min Typ Max Min Typ Max

LF to 4 GHz High Linearity Y-Mixer ADL5350

DESIGN OF 3 TO 5 GHz CMOS LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER FOR ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) SYSTEM

EVALUATION KIT AVAILABLE 10MHz to 1050MHz Integrated RF Oscillator with Buffered Outputs. Typical Operating Circuit. 10nH 1000pF MAX2620 BIAS SUPPLY

RF9986. Micro-Cell PCS Base Stations Portable Battery Powered Equipment

DESCRIPTIO FEATURES APPLICATIO S. LT GHz to 2.7GHz Receiver Front End TYPICAL APPLICATIO

Evaluating and Optimizing Tradeoffs in CMOS RFIC Upconversion Mixer Design. by Dr. Stephen Long University of California, Santa Barbara

CMOS Dual Band Receiver GSM 900-Mhz / DSS-GSM1800-GHz

Narrowband CMOS RF Low-Noise Amplifiers

Highly linear common-gate mixer employing intrinsic second and third order distortion cancellation

Christopher J. Barnwell ECE Department U. N. Carolina at Charlotte Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA

Low-Power RF Integrated Circuit Design Techniques for Short-Range Wireless Connectivity

Document Version Publisher s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers)

A 2.4 GHZ RECEIVER IN SILICON-ON-SAPPHIRE MICHAEL PETERS. B.S., Kansas State University, 2009 A REPORT

A High Gain and Improved Linearity 5.7GHz CMOS LNA with Inductive Source Degeneration Topology

Design of a Broadband HEMT Mixer for UWB Applications

HIGH-GAIN CMOS LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER FOR ULTRA WIDE-BAND WIRELESS RECEIVER

Linearization Method Using Variable Capacitance in Inter-Stage Matching Networks for CMOS Power Amplifier

Course Project Topic: RF Down-Conversion Chain Due Dates: Mar. 24, Apr. 7 (Interim reports), Apr. 28 (Final report)

Quiz2: Mixer and VCO Design

i. At the start-up of oscillation there is an excess negative resistance (-R)

1-13GHz Wideband LNA utilizing a Transformer as a Compact Inter-stage Network in 65nm CMOS

ETI , Good luck! Written Exam Integrated Radio Electronics. Lund University Dept. of Electroscience

Designing a fully integrated low noise Tunable-Q Active Inductor for RF applications

Application Note 1299

DESIGN ANALYSIS AND COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RF RECEIVER FRONT-ENDS IN 0.18-µM CMOS

Low Noise Amplifier Design

6.776 High Speed Communication Circuits and Systems Lecture 14 Voltage Controlled Oscillators

A 900 MHz CMOS RF Receiver

Understanding VCO Concepts

2005 IEEE. Reprinted with permission.

ISSCC 2004 / SESSION 21/ 21.1

Aspemyr, Lars; Jacobsson, Harald; Bao, Mingquan; Sjöland, Henrik; Ferndal, Mattias; Carchon, G

ISSCC 2003 / SESSION 10 / HIGH SPEED BUILDING BLOCKS / PAPER 10.8

Design and Simulation of Voltage-Mode and Current-Mode Class-D Power Amplifiers for 2.4 GHz Applications

A 2.4 GHZ CMOS LNA INPUT MATCHING DESIGN USING RESISTIVE FEEDBACK TOPOLOGY IN 0.13µm TECHNOLOGY

A 5-GHz CMOS Wireless LAN Receiver Front End

SP 23.6: A 1.8GHz CMOS Voltage-Controlled Oscillator

ABabcdfghiejklStanford University

ISSCC 2006 / SESSION 11 / RF BUILDING BLOCKS AND PLLS / 11.9

THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLEDGE

Performance Comparison of RF CMOS Low Noise Amplifiers in 0.18-µm technology scale

High Gain Low Noise Amplifier Design Using Active Feedback

ACMOS RF up/down converter would allow a considerable

A 2.6GHz/5.2GHz CMOS Voltage-Controlled Oscillator*

10MHz to 1050MHz Integrated RF Oscillator with Buffered Outputs

A 1-W GaAs Class-E Power Amplifier with an FBAR Filter Embedded in the Output Network

Design and optimization of a 2.4 GHz RF front-end with an on-chip balun

A 5GHz, 32mW CMOS Frequency Synthesizer with an Injection Locked Frequency Divider. Hamid Rategh, Hirad Samavati, Thomas Lee

THE rapid evolution of wireless communications has resulted

6.776 High Speed Communication Circuits Lecture 6 MOS Transistors, Passive Components, Gain- Bandwidth Issue for Broadband Amplifiers

1 MHz to 2.7 GHz RF Gain Block AD8354

A 5.2GHz RF Front-End

Rethinking The Role Of phemt Cascode Amplifiers In RF Design

1 MHz to 2.7 GHz RF Gain Block AD8354

Low Flicker Noise Current-Folded Mixer

A GSM Band Low-Power LNA 1. LNA Schematic

RF transmitter with Cartesian feedback

A 7-GHz 1.8-dB NF CMOS Low-Noise Amplifier

ISSCC 2006 / SESSION 33 / MOBILE TV / 33.4

An 8mA, 3.8dB NF, 40dB Gain CMOS Front-End for GPS Applications

Design of the Low Phase Noise Voltage Controlled Oscillator with On-Chip Vs Off- Chip Passive Components.

High-Linearity CMOS. RF Front-End Circuits

MP 4.3 Monolithic CMOS Distributed Amplifier and Oscillator

ISSCC 2002 / SESSION 17 / ADVANCED RF TECHNIQUES / 17.2

Application Note 5460

RF2334. Typical Applications. Final PA for Low Power Applications Broadband Test Equipment

A 3 5 GHz CMOS High Linearity Ultra Wideband Low Noise Amplifier in 0.18µ CMOS

Single-Ended to Differential Converter for Multiple-Stage Single-Ended Ring Oscillators

A 3 8 GHz Broadband Low Power Mixer

THE rapid growth of portable wireless communication

RADIO frequency designs are increasingly taking advantage

Design of a Magnetically Tunable Low Noise Amplifier in 0.13 um CMOS Technology

ISSCC 2006 / SESSION 20 / WLAN/WPAN / 20.5

A 2.4-GHz 24-dBm SOI CMOS Power Amplifier with Fully Integrated Output Balun and Switched Capacitors for Load Line Adaptation

RF2418 LOW CURRENT LNA/MIXER

Transcription:

SP 22.3: A 12mW Wide Dynamic Range CMOS Front-End for a Portable GPS Receiver Arvin R. Shahani, Derek K. Shaeffer, Thomas H. Lee Stanford University, Stanford, CA At submicron channel lengths, CMOS is an attractive alternative to silicon bipolar and GaAs MESFET technologies for use in wireless receivers. A 12mW global positioning system (GPS) receiver front-end, comprising a low noise amplifier (LNA) and mixer implemented in a standard 0.35µm digital CMOS process, demonstrates the aptitude of CMOS for portable wireless applications. A block diagram of the receiver front-end test is shown in Figure 1. The system consists of a LNA, mixer, buffer (for testing purposes only), and associated bias circuitry. Note that the LNA output and mixer input are taken off-chip to facilitate testing of each block individually. To achieve a wide dynamic range, the noise figure of the LNA and linearity of the mixer are of primary concern. Figure 2 shows the circuit schematic of the LNA. A differential architecture is chosen in anticipation of eventual integration of a complete GPS receiver. Its common mode rejection eases the task of rejecting interference from other on-chip elements, such as a DSP core. This choice results in increased amplifier noise for a given power dissipation compared to a single-ended implementation. This increase is mitigated by the high ω T of the process, that permits acceptable noise performance despite a differential implementation. The input stage, consisting of M 1,2 and L 1,2, uses inductive source degeneration to generate a real term in the differential input impedance equal to ω T (L 1 +L 2 ) that can be matched to the off-chip transmission lines from the image-reject filter. By resonating the input capacitance of the amplifier, the minimum possible noise figure can also be achieved [1]. A minimum exists due to the presence of induced gate noise in MOS devices, as described in Reference 2. The source degeneration inductors, L 1,2, are implemented as on-chip spiral inductors. The output signal from M 1,2 flows through cascoding devices M 3,4 and on to a parallel-tuned output stage formed by M 7,8. The tuning inductors, L 3,4, are 3nH on-chip spirals. They serve the additional purpose of sharing the bias current between the first and second stages, leading to reduced power consumption. M 5,6 are ac coupling capacitors, while R 6 and R 9 provide simple pull-up biasing for the gates of M 7,8. This arrangement allows signal voltages at the gates of the output stage to swing above the supply, which is advantageous for low-voltage operation. Note that resistors R 7,8 are off-chip 50Ω loads. To bias devices M 1 -M 4, an active common-mode feedback maximizes the use of limited supply headroom. Through the action of a simple operational amplifier, formed by M 12 -M 16, the V gs of the input devices is used as a reference for biasing the cascode stack. This permits the amplifier to operate reliably on a 1.5V supply, independent of process, supply, and temperature variations. The forward gain (S21) and noise figure of the LNA are plotted in Figure 3. The LNA exhibits an S21 of 17.7dB and a noise figure of 3.8dB at 1.575GHz. This is achieved with 12mW dissipation from a 1.5V supply. Note that a single-ended implementation of the amplifier would have a 2.3dB noise figure. Although suffering increased noise, the differential architecture permits a reverse isolation of -52dB, unattainable in a single-ended version. A simplified mixer schematic is shown in Figure 4. Note that some of the biasing details have been omitted. The local oscillator and its inverse, LO, control which pair of transistors M 1 -M 4 is on, and thus the polarity with which the load is presented to the RF port. It is this switching of polarity that establishes mixing. A unique feature of this mixer is the reactive termination of both the RF and IF ports. A capacitive IF termination offers the advantage that it contributes no noise to the mixing process. At the RF port, a reactive tank is used to filter broadband noise from the source resistance and parasitic tank resistance, as well as the switches. Bond wires are used to achieve a good Q in addition to an innovative capacitor layout described in the next paragraph. A further improvement is the addition of inductors in series with the input source resistance to form an L-match together with part of the tank capacitance. This boosts the signal voltage and enhances filtering by increasing the effective source resistance. Area-efficient linear capacitors are generally unavailable in standard digital process technologies (such as the one used here). However, deep submicron processes do allow small spacing between metal lines on any given interconnect layer, leading to high coupling capacitance. While this property is normally considered undesirable, it is exploited in this design to augment the ordinary parallel plate capacitance. By operating the transistors in the linear region, good mixer linearity is achieved. The high impedance at the mixer IF port afforded by the on-chip environment improves linearity by reducing the signal currents in the MOS switches. Additionally, a large linear tank capacitor dominates the transistor non-linear parasitic capacitances. The results of a two-tone IP3 measurement on the mixer are shown in Figure 5. Note that the impedance level at the mixer output is not 50Ω. Indeed, the impedance is complex, so the mixer output quantities are expressed in dbv rather than dbm. The mixer has a -3.6dB voltage conversion gain, with an inputreferred IP3 of +10dBm and an input 1dB compression point of -5dBm. Measured mixer SSB noise figure is 10dB. For these measurements, the LO drive amplitude is equivalent to the voltage swing associated with -3.5dBm into 100Ω. However, the LO port presents a nearly capacitive reactance, and hence actually dissipates little power. The results of experimental measurements are summarized in Table 1. The LNA-mixer combination exhibits the best performance achieved to date of any CMOS implementation in this frequency range at this power level. Acknowledgments: The authors thank D. Dobberpuhl and Digital Equipment Corporation for supporting this work, and Vitesse Semiconductor for providing high-frequency packaging. References: [1] Shaeffer, D. K., T. H. Lee, A 1.5V, 1.5GHz CMOS low noise amplifier, Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, 1996, pp. 32-33. [2] van der Ziel, A., Noise in Solid State Devices and Circuits, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986.

22-3-1: Block diagram of the GPS front-end test setup.

22-3-2: LNA circuit schematic.

22-3-3: LNA forward gain (S21) and noise figure.

22-3-4: Schematic of mixer circuit with test buffer.

22-3-5: Mixer two-tone IP3 measurement.

22-3-6: Chip micrograph.

Low-noise amplifier Frequency Noise figure S21 S12 IP3 (input) 1dB compression (input) Power dissipation 1.575GHz 3.8dB 17.7dB < -52dB -6dBm -20dBm 12mW Mixer LO frequency 1.4GHz LO amplitude 300mV ( 3.5dBm in 100Ω) Voltage conversion gain -3.6dB IP3 (input) 10dBm 1dB compression (input) -5dBm Noise figure (SSB) 10dB Supply voltage 1.5V Technology 0.35µm CMOS Die area 0.84mm² 22-3-Table 1: GPS front-end performance summary.