Michel Callon: Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay INF 5011- Feb2011/ Beata, Ebenezer, Elise
Introduction Michel Callon and ANT o French sociologist founder of ANT together with Bruno Latour and John Law ANT o actor-networks o translation o Principle of generalized symmetry o [negotiation, alignment and inscription]
Motivation (main focus and argument) outline a new approach to the study of power - an analytic framework to the study of the role of science and technology in structuring power relationships The sociology of translation The principles (to avoid three major difficulties in STS): o Agnosticism o Generalized symmetry (all the actors have interests) o Free association
The actor-network The scallops The fishermen The research community The three marine biologists
The Four Moments of Translation Problematization -Building the Network Interessement - Building the Network Enrolment - Building the Network Mobilisation (Dissidence) - Changing and Rebuilding the Network
Problematization interdefinition and OPP (Obligatory Passage Point) DOES PECTEN ANCHOR? We want to restock the bay with scallops! We want to advance the knowledge about scallops! We want to survive!
Interessment Collectors ensure protection from predators and anchorage Representatives of the fisherman discuss the reasons of the extinction of the scallops with the researchers Lack of knowledge about scallops is professed during conferences and through publications
Enrolment system of alliances Inte rup tion!! The scallops anchor only in certain conditions. Sig nifi ca nce? The experiment is convincing, but previous work must be recognized. All conclusions are accepted (consent without discussion).
Mobilisation Fair Representation o Spokesmen-Who speak in the name of who o Representative-Who represents who o Transformation and Displacement Examples of Mobilisation o Few Larvae represents/speaks for anonymous mass o Few scientist speaks for masses-scientific Induction? That which is true a few is true for whole population Sociology of Induction!!-(induction is also true here) o Union Delegate Speaks in the name of all members o No one is sure the masses will follow their representative
Mobilisation Social, natural and scientific realties are similar o Counting larvae is similar to electing representative o The larvae authorize the researchers to speak on their just like social delegates o The three researcher are imposed spokesmen and representative for all Transformation and Displacement o Examples Scallops - Larvae - Numbers- Tables and Curves (Easily transportable) Fishermen - voting - ballots - delegates Discussion in the conference is a mobilization
Dissidence: Betrayal and Controversies The Dynamic interest and Identity o What happens when the role and the identity of the actors change in future Repeated experiment may show different results -Betrayal The belief can fluctuate with controversy - Betrayal Characteristics and identity of actors can change- Betrayal Will the negotiation that hold the first time hold in future?
Translation-ANT
Conclusion The article treats the uncertainty in the properties of nature and society and their interest in the same way. The researchers interest was not represented as an error of judgement The same terms are use to explained the behavior of all actors but not social norm or factors The discussion is based on dynamic role and identity of actors (dissidence) instead of static behavior. What is translation?!!!!!
Question? Is Scallop Social or Nature? Is Induction in Only Science or Sociology? Which Knowledge is Superior? (Comment on the picture) Is ANT the End of the Big Discussion?