Work Plan for Pre-Construction Avian and Bat Surveys

Similar documents
Work Plan for Pre-Construction Avian and Bat Surveys

Work Plan for 2015 Pre- Construction Avian and Bat Surveys Swanton Wind Project

DRAFT Mad River Wind Project Avian and Bat Survey Work Plan:

Appendix G. Avian and Bat Work Plans

To: EverPower From: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. NYSDEC. 30 Park Drive Topsham, ME File: Date: February 11, 2014

Chokecherry and Sierra Madre Wind Energy Project

Working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people.

THE USE OF ACOUSTIC TRANSECTS TO DOCUMENT CHANGES IN BAT DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE. Eric R. Britzke & Carl Herzog

Deer River Wind Farm 16-F-0267 APPENDIX G

Eagle Observation Surveys Arkwright Summit Wind Project Chautauqua County, New York

Bald Eagle Annual Report February 1, 2016

Memorandum. To: Heritage Wind, LLC. From: Justin Zoladz. Date: October 30, Re: 2017 Spring Migratory Raptor Survey Results

GUIDELINES for CONDUCTING BIRD and BAT STUDIES at COMMERCIAL WIND ENERGY PROJECTS. Prepared by

Memorandum. Introduction

Below I will comment on the Stantec submission (quoted in dark blue) that illustrate this poorly planned research:

The USFWS is here to help you! An overview of the ESA process

Bat Distribution and Habitat Use

The following protocols should begin as soon as feasible after identification of a diurnal roost (ideally that night):

From: Cris Hein & Todd Mabee, ABR, Inc. Environmental Research & Services

Subject: Comments on FWS R5 ES , Environmental Impact Statement for Beech Ridge Energy s Habitat Conservation Plan

Step-by-Step Instructions for Documenting Compliance on the Bald Eagle Form For WSDOT s On-Call Consultants

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Waterbird Migration, Breeding, and Habitat Use Study Plan Section 10.15

United States Department of the Interior

Study Surveys of Eagles and Other Raptors

DRAFT. GUIDELINES for CONDUCTING BIRD and BAT STUDIES at COMMERCIAL WIND ENERGY PROJECTS. Prepared by

Summer and Early-Fall 2009 Peregrine Falcon Use Surveys

Pre and Post-Construction Monitoring of Bat Populations at Industrial Wind Turbines Sites

Bald Eagle and Osprey Nest Survey Study Plan for Energy Northwest's Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC No Lewis County, Washington

Rochester Birding Association, 55 Ontario St., Honeoye Falls NY 14472

Baseline Bat Acoustic Analysis for the Green River Proposed Wind Energy Site: Summary of 2011 Fall Field Season

For the identified species, each icon represents the detection of a single bat echolocation trigger. Confidence in species identification is high.

A large-scale, multispecies assessment of avian mortality rates at onshore wind turbines in northern Germany (PROGRESS) T.

Guidance note: Distribution of breeding birds in relation to upland wind farms

OHIO DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AND USFWS (OH FIELD OFFICE) GUIDANCE FOR BAT PERMITTED BIOLOGIST April 2015

Species Conclusions Table

INDIANA BAT SUMMER SURVEY GUIDANCE PART DEUX. Robyn Niver, Mike Armstrong, and Andrew King U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF SEA DUCKS AND DIVING DUCKS ON LAKE ST. CLAIR AND W. LAKE ERIE

Final Environmental Assessment

United States Department of the Interior

Grey County Natural Heritage System Study

Prepared For: Prepared by:

Hardrock Project GRT Terrestrial Working Group Environmental Baseline

Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project Field Studies Information Sheet

RECENT CHANGES TO THE ILLINOIS SMCRA THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES (T&E) REQUIREMENTS

APPENDIX E. Bat White Paper

2010 Frog & Toad Survey. CR 510-Red Road-Sleepy Hollow & CR 550. Marquette County, Michigan

Expansion Work Has Begun The perimeter dike for Cell 7 is now visible

Stillwater PGM-Cu Project Whip-poor-will and Common Nighthawk Survey 2013

BALD EAGLE MANAGEMENT 2014 ANNUAL REPORT

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document ARLIS Uniform Cover Page

BIRDS AND BATS: Potential Impacts and Survey Techniques

Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus

AERIAL SURVEY OF BIRDS AT MONO LAKE ON AUGUST 24, 1973

APPENDIX A ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT CONDITION REQUIREMENTS CONDITION 4.0

Meenbog Wind Farm Development. Post-construction Bird Monitoring Programme

Update on Northern Long-eared Bat in Minnesota

Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Project, FERC Project No. 619 Revised Study Plan

Ecological Impacts of Wind Farms: Global Studies. Are Wind Farms Hazardous to Birds and Bats? Stephen J. Ambrose

2009 Spring, Summer, and Fall Avian and Bat Surveys for the Groton Wind Project in Groton, New Hampshire

Ladd Marsh Wildlife Area BCS number: 49-3

Summary of Acoustic Bat Surveys on the NorthMet Project Area October 3, 2014

Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) Management Indicator Species Assessment Ochoco National Forest

Avian Studies for the Sanilac County Michigan Wind Power Project: Summary of 2007 Field Seasons - Annual Report

Sandhill Cranes and Waterfowl of the North Platte River Valley: Evaluation of Habitat Selection to Guide Conservation Delivery

Watching for Whoopers in Wisconsin Wetlands

Recommended Protocols for Monitoring Impacts of Wind Turbines on Birds. April Environment Canada Canadian Wildlife Service

Groton Wind, LLC P.O. Box 326 Concord, NH Prepared for: Prepared by: Stantec Consulting 30 Park Drive Topsham, ME 04086

Biological Inventories

Transect Establishment and Survey Protocol Acoustic Bat Survey Driving Transects

POST-CONSTRUCTION WILDLIFE MONITORING AT THE ATLANTIC CITY UTILITIES AUTHORITY- JERSEY ATLANTIC WIND POWER FACILITY

Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project Field Studies Information Sheet

Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project Field Studies Information Sheet

Baseline Bat Acoustic Analysis for the Proposed Blissfield Wind Energy Project: Summary of 2011 Spring Migration Field Season

Wildlife Guidelines for Alberta Wind Energy Projects

Short-eared Owl. Title Short-eared Owl

IBA Monitoring Guide

Estimating Seasonal Avian Diversity in an Urban Wetland in Columbus, Ohio. Kaitlin Carr 20 April 2018

Recommended Protocols for Monitoring Impacts of Wind Turbines on Birds. Draft May Environment Canada Canadian Wildlife Service

McLane Center and Silk Farm Sanctuary Comprehensive Environmental Education Guide

Comment Set 1: California Department of Fish and Game

Tiered Species Habitats (Terrestrial and Aquatic)

44. MARINE WILDLIFE Introduction Results and Discussion. Marine Wildlife Cook Inlet

Title Marsh Bird Habitat Restoration and Management on Private and Public land in Arkansas Mississippi Alluvial Valley

1.1 Bat Survey Methods. Materials and Data Analysis

LOCATION OF SHARP-TAILED GROUSE AND GREATER PRAIRIE-CHICKEN DISPLAY GROUNDS IN RELATION TO NPPD AINSWORTH WIND ENERGY FACILITY

McKay Creek National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-19

WindWise Education. 2 nd. T ransforming the Energy of Wind into Powerful Minds. editi. A Curriculum for Grades 6 12

Assessing the Importance of Wetlands on DoD Installations for the Persistence of Wetland-Dependent Birds in North America (Legacy )

Mystic Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC Project Number Year Bald Eagle Monitoring Summary Report Public

Bat Habitat Conservation Priorities in Missouri Indiana Bat, Northern Long-Eared Bat, and Gray Bat

BV-24A DMMA Florida Scrub-Jay Survey Brevard County

Tualatin River NWR and Wapato Lake BCS number: 47-37

Fall 2001 Whooping Crane Migrational Survey Protocol Implementation Report

Measuring changes in a rapidly changing climate and landscape.

PLAN B Natural Heritage

A COMPUTER VISION AND MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM FOR BIRD AND BAT DETECTION AND FORECASTING

Note: Some squares have continued to be monitored each year since the 2013 survey.

Bat Surveys. Metro Parks, Serving Summit County

Sensitive Wildlife Species Surveys and Observations for the White Pines Wind Resource Area Field Season

1. Monitoring Breeding Colonial Waterbirds in the U.S. Great Lakes Francie Cuthbert, University of Minnesota

Transcription:

Work Plan for Pre-Construction Avian and Bat Surveys, Steuben County, New York Prepared For: EverPower Wind Holdings, Inc. 1251 Waterfront Place, 3rd Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Prepared By: Stantec Consulting 30 Park Drive Topsham, ME 04086 June 2013 REV September 2013

Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 BIRD AND BAT SURVEYS... 1 2.1 EAGLE POINT COUNT SURVEYS... 1 2.2 HABITAT ASSESSMENT... 3 2.3 ACOUSTIC BAT SURVEYS... 3 2.4 RAPTOR MIGRATION SURVEYS... 4 2.5 BREEDING AND MIGRATORY BIRD SURVEYS... 4 3.0 REPORTING... 5 June 2013 REV September 2013 i

1.0 Introduction EverPower Wind Holdings, Inc. (EverPower) is considering the construction of the Baron Wind Project (Project) located in Steuben County, New York. The proposed Project would include wind turbines located west of Interstate 390 and north and south of Route 85 in the towns of Canisteo, Hornell, and Cohocton (Figure 1). The Project is in the early phase of development and the approximate size of the area of interest is 60,000 acres. The number and locations of turbines, access roads, and electrical corridors are preliminary. As part of the planning phases of this Project, EverPower contracted Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) to prepare a work plan for pre-construction bird and bat studies. The survey methodologies and level of effort identified in this proposed work plan are based on Standard Pre-Construction Studies detailed in NYSDEC s Guidelines for Conducting Bird and Bat Studies at Commercial Wind Energy Projects (NYSDEC Guidelines; NYSDEC 2009) as well as the US Fish and Wildlife Service s (USFWS) Land-based Wind Energy Guidelines (2012) and Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance (ECP Guidance, 2013). However, the Project lies between 2 operational wind projects, the Cohocton and Dutch Hill Wind Project and the Howard Wind Project; both pre- and post-construction bird and bat studies have been conducted at these 2 projects, including pre-construction spring and fall raptor migration and nocturnal migration studies. Due to the proximity of the Project to these operational projects and the prior survey effort conducted at these projects, the effort for some pre-construction surveys at the Project can be eliminated or reduced. For example, surveys targeting bird and bat movements that are more regional rather than site-specifically based (i.e., raptor migration and bat migration) will not be repeated for this Project. A Draft version of this work plan (June 2013) was presented to biologists at the New York Regional Field Office of the USFWS in Cortland, NY on June 18, 2013 and to NYSDEC via conference call on June 27, 2013. EverPower and Stantec met with USFWS a second time on September 3, 2013 via conference call to discuss the proposed eagle point count locations, which EverPower provided to USFWS prior to the call. This work plan has been revised based on a preliminary Project layout and recommendations made by USFWS and NYSDEC during those meetings. For meeting summaries, please refer to the two sets of meeting minutes dated July 17 (detailing the June 18 and June 27 meetings) and meeting minutes dated September 13, 2013. 2.0 Bird and Bat Surveys 2.1 EAGLE POINT COUNT SURVEYS Stantec will conduct point count surveys for eagles for one full year consistent with the ECP Guidance. Point count surveys will consist of 1-hour visual surveys at plots within the Project area, each with an 800- meter radius and covering an area of 2 square kilometers. Stantec will survey 34 plots 1 within the Project area and 2 plots outside the Project area each survey cycle (approximately every 3 weeks, totaling 18 total surveys in 1 year). Stantec will complete each survey cycle in 5 to 6 days. Plots within the Project area will be distributed throughout the Project area, where the observer has a view of the sky; plots will not be conducted in forested areas unless suitable vantage points exist. The 2 plots outside the Project 1 Per the April 2013 ECP Guidelines, the total number of proposed point count locations was determined by calculating the entire turbine area including a 1-km buffer around turbines, calculating 30% of the area, and dividing by 2 (to account for the 2 squarekilometer plots). June 2013 REV September 2013 1

7 kj!i 15 1 3 9 2 5 %[a 6 8 11 10 12 14 13 17 18 19 4 16 20 0 2 Kilometers 00885_01_Workplan.mxd 21 22 23 24 %[a%[a 26 25 27 29 30 28 31 32 33 35 36 34 0 2 Miles Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 30 Park Drive Topsham, ME USA 04086 Phone (207) 729-1199 Fax: (207) 729-2715 www.stantec.com Legend Eagle Point Count Location Breeding Bird Survey Location Breeding Bird Survey Control Location %[a MET Tower and Acoustic Bat Survey Location Proposed Turbine Layout kj Bald Eagle Nest Breeding Bird Survey Transect Breeding Bird Survey Control Transect General Project Area Canacadea State Forest Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Client/Project EverPower Wind Holdings, Inc. Baron Winds Project Steuben County, New York Figure No. 1 Title Bird and Bat Survey Locations 9/9/2013 195600885

area will be located in proximity to the nearest bald eagle nest. Stantec will survey from 2 locations with direct views of the nest, as possible. Data collected from these points will be qualitative and will help inform movement patterns (i.e., seasonal and directional) of the bald eagle pair occupying this nest, if the nest is active at the time of surveys. Proposed point count locations are shown in Figure 1; final locations will be determined after the first site visit and will consider viewsheds and access. Point count locations will be mapped using a Global Positioning Systems (GPS) unit. Surveys will occur in all weather conditions except when visibility is poor. Survey efforts will target the hours of 10 am to 4 pm, the midday hours in which eagles tend to be more active. The starting plot will change each survey cycle to enable sampling of each plot during a range of daylight hours. Though the species targeted during point count surveys is bald eagle, all raptors observed will be recorded. In addition, Stantec will record incidental observations of other species (i.e., waterbirds and songbirds) observed during surveys. Eagle point count surveys are planned to begin the week of September 9, 2013. After completion of the eagle point counts, data collected will be summarized and included in a memo report. The memo report will include the eagle exposure rate calculation, expressed as exposure minutes per daylight hour within the Project area, averaged over daylight hours. 2.2 HABITAT ASSESSMENT Stantec will conduct a habitat assessment during the first round of eagle point count surveys. Habitat data obtained at each point will include cover type, percent canopy cover, and notes of any current or previous disturbance. The habitat assessment will inform the Project of the presence of any habitat with potential to support state or federally listed species. Habitat of state or federally listed wildlife species known or expected to occur in the area will be compared to the habitats identified in the Project area. If such habitat is found in the Project area, we will contact the appropriate agencies (NYSDEC if habitat known to support a state-listed species if found, USFWS if habitat known to support a federally listed species is found) to assess the need for additional field surveys. According to the rare species records database by county maintained by the USFWS, no federally listed bird or bat species are known to occur in Steuben County 2. 2.3 ACOUSTIC BAT SURVEYS Stantec will conduct acoustic bat surveys to characterize activity, timing of activity, and when possible, species composition of bats in the area. As bat activity levels during spring and fall migration periods already have been studied at Cohocton and Howard, we expect that these surveys will not be repeated for the full period when bats are known to be active (spring, summer, and fall). However, to obtain data on the species composition (by guild 3 ) and activity of local bat populations during the summer residency and fall swarming period, the period in which bat fatalities have peaked at other operational projects in the East, passive acoustic echolocation monitoring surveys will be conducted from June 1 to September 30. Specific surveys targeting Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) will not be conducted as the Project is outside the known range of this species 4. At the Project site, 2 Anabat SD1 detectors (Titley Electronics Pty Ltd.) will be deployed in each of the 2 on-site meteorological (met) towers at approximately 45 m and 3 m in height, as recommended by NYSDEC Guidelines. Recording at the detectors will occur daily from one half hour prior to sunset until 2 Note that bald eagle has been delisted. http://www.fws.gov/northeast/nyfo/es/colistcurrent.pdf. REV. July 16, 2012. Accessed June 10, 2013.) 3 Bat call sequences will be identified to guild, although during analysis calls will be categorized by species when possible; no attempt will be made to differentiate call sequences within the Myotis genus. 4 http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/6972.html June 2013 REV September 2013 3

one half hour after sunrise during the survey period. Periodic visits will be conducted to download data and maintain the detectors. Following completion of the acoustic survey, data will be compiled and evaluated. Once downloaded, each data file will be either visually inspected or filtered using appropriate filtering program software to screen out bat calls. Each call file will be qualitatively identified to guild and when possible, to species. A second biologist will visually inspect each call to ensure accuracy. The final report will summarize calls from each detector for each night (i.e., number of calls by species or guild per hour) during the survey period. Wind speed, wind direction, and temperature data from the met tower will be compiled to assess if these weather variables are correlated with bat activity levels. Weather data from the met tower for each survey period will be used in the analysis. Results will be incorporated into a comprehensive report to be drafted following completion of the bird and bat surveys. 2.4 RAPTOR MIGRATION SURVEYS Raptor migration surveys will not be conducted at the Project for reasons mentioned previously. Though fixed-location raptor migration surveys will not be conducted, observers will record any raptors seen during the eagle point count surveys conducted once every 3 weeks for a full year. 2.5 BREEDING AND MIGRATORY BIRD SURVEYS Breeding and migratory bird surveys will be conducted once each week in May and June (for migratory and breeding birds) and September (for migratory birds), consistent with recommendations during the call with NYSDEC, EverPower and Stantec on June 27, 2013. As suggested in the ECP Guidance, point count surveys for migratory and breeding birds will be accomplished in conjunction with the eagle point counts during the months of May, June, and September prior to or following the 1-hour eagle point count survey. Surveys will be conducted from sunrise until no later than approximately 10:00 a.m., in weather conditions conducive to hearing birdsong and seeing birds move about in vegetation and in flight. All birds identified by sight or sound, including soaring raptors, waterfowl and other fly-overs, will be recorded at each survey point. Weather information will be recorded at each survey location. Locations of September migratory bird survey points will be the same as the eagle point count locations within the Project area (i.e., not including points 7 and 15) (Figure 1). Breeding bird surveys in May and June will be conducted at a total of 160 points distributed along 32 separate transects; 105 points will be distributed evenly across 21 linear transects perpendicular to approximate turbine locations and 55 control points will be distributed across 11 transects in control sites where no impacts are expected to occur (Figure 1). Survey points will be spaced at 125-m intervals along transects to help reduce the likelihood of double-counting individuals, and transects will be 500 meters long. Stantec will survey each transect once in May and again in June, with a different set of transects searched during each week in May and June. If landowner permissions or site conditions prevent access to any points or transects as currently mapped, or if proposed points are not within representative habitat types, survey locations may be shifted slightly during the first survey. The final location of each survey point will be recorded with a Global Positioning System. The September migratory bird surveys commenced the week of September 2, 2013. Species richness, relative abundance, species frequency, and community diversity will be determined. Results will be incorporated into a comprehensive report to be drafted following completion of the bird and bat surveys. June 2013 REV September 2013 4

3.0 Reporting Stantec will draft a single comprehensive report discussing results of the bird and bat surveys described above (acoustic bat and migratory and breeding bird surveys). Stantec will draft a separate memo report providing results of the eagle point count surveys. Reports will follow typical scientific reporting standards and will include Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion sections. Reports will include appropriate photographs, tables, and figures. Draft reports will be submitted to EverPower and to NYSDEC and USFWS for review and comment. June 2013 REV September 2013 5