OFDM and FFT. Cairo University Faculty of Engineering Department of Electronics and Electrical Communications Dr. Karim Ossama Abbas Fall 2010

Similar documents
Practical issue: Group definition. TSTE17 System Design, CDIO. Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) Components of a digital communication system

Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM)

Outline / Wireless Networks and Applications Lecture 7: Physical Layer OFDM. Frequency-Selective Radio Channel. How Do We Increase Rates?

Basic idea: divide spectrum into several 528 MHz bands.

Wireless Communication Systems: Implementation perspective

Lecture 13. Introduction to OFDM

TSTE17 System Design, CDIO. General project hints. Behavioral Model. General project hints, cont. Lecture 5. Required documents Modulation, cont.

Principles and Experiments of Communications

Performance Analysis of n Wireless LAN Physical Layer

Nutaq OFDM Reference

Lecture 3: Wireless Physical Layer: Modulation Techniques. Mythili Vutukuru CS 653 Spring 2014 Jan 13, Monday

Advanced 3G & 4G Wireless Communication Prof. Aditya K. Jagannatham Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Receiver Designs for the Radio Channel

Performance Evaluation of Wireless Communication System Employing DWT-OFDM using Simulink Model

Chapter 5 OFDM. Office Hours: BKD Tuesday 14:00-16:00 Thursday 9:30-11:30

Mohammad Hossein Manshaei 1393

EE6604 Personal & Mobile Communications. Week 16. Multi-carrier Multi-access Techniques

Chapter 0 Outline. NCCU Wireless Comm. Lab

Combined Phase Compensation and Power Allocation Scheme for OFDM Systems

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

2002 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference 2002 IEEE

BER Analysis for MC-CDMA

An Overview of PAPR Reduction Techniques In Concerned with OFDM

High Performance Fbmc/Oqam System for Next Generation Multicarrier Wireless Communication

Anju 1, Amit Ahlawat 2

Multipath can be described in two domains: time and frequency

Field Experiments of 2.5 Gbit/s High-Speed Packet Transmission Using MIMO OFDM Broadband Packet Radio Access

S.D.M COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

ICI Mitigation for Mobile OFDM with Application to DVB-H

UNIFIED DIGITAL AUDIO AND DIGITAL VIDEO BROADCASTING SYSTEM USING ORTHOGONAL FREQUENCY DIVISION MULTIPLEXING (OFDM) SYSTEM

A Research Concept on Bit Rate Detection using Carrier offset through Analysis of MC-CDMA SYSTEM

Multi-carrier Modulation and OFDM

EC 551 Telecommunication System Engineering. Mohamed Khedr

Analysis of Interference & BER with Simulation Concept for MC-CDMA

Performance Analysis of OFDM System in Multipath Fading Environment

OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) SIMULATION USING MATLAB Neha Pathak MTech Scholar, Shri am Institute of Technology

DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF OFDM TRANSCEIVER FOR ISI REDUCTION USING OQPSK MODULATION

OFDMA and MIMO Notes

Introduction to OFDM Systems

Technical Aspects of LTE Part I: OFDM

Publication of Little Lion Scientific R&D, Islamabad PAKISTAN

EE359 Lecture 18 Outline

Performance Analysis of OFDM for Different Digital Modulation Schemes using Matlab Simulation

Implementation of High-throughput Access Points for IEEE a/g Wireless Infrastructure LANs

With a lot of material from Rich Nicholls, CTL/RCL and Kurt Sundstrom, of unknown whereabouts

M.Tech Student, Asst Professor Department Of Eelectronics and Communications, SRKR Engineering College, Andhra Pradesh, India

Space Time Block Coding - Spatial Modulation for Multiple-Input Multiple-Output OFDM with Index Modulation System

Broadband OFDM-FDMA System for the Uplink of a Wireless LAN

OFDM AS AN ACCESS TECHNIQUE FOR NEXT GENERATION NETWORK

4x4 Time-Domain MIMO encoder with OFDM Scheme in WIMAX Context

Implementation and Comparative analysis of Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) Signaling Rashmi Choudhary

Internet Access to High Speed Trains using the IEEE a System

Implementation of OFDM System Using FFT and IFFT

An FPGA 1Gbps Wireless Baseband MIMO Transceiver

ENHANCING BER PERFORMANCE FOR OFDM

Performance Analysis of Ofdm Transceiver using Gmsk Modulation Technique

Performance Evaluation of OFDM System with Rayleigh, Rician and AWGN Channels

Performance analysis of OFDM with QPSK using AWGN and Rayleigh Fading Channel

MITIGATING CARRIER FREQUENCY OFFSET USING NULL SUBCARRIERS

Experimenting with Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing OFDM Modulation

Fundamentals of OFDM Communication Technology

Chapter 6. Agile Transmission Techniques

CHAPTER 3 ADAPTIVE MODULATION TECHNIQUE WITH CFO CORRECTION FOR OFDM SYSTEMS

Principles of Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing and Multiple Input Multiple Output Communications Systems

IMPROVED CHANNEL ESTIMATION FOR OFDM BASED WLAN SYSTEMS. G.V.Rangaraj M.R.Raghavendra K.Giridhar

Researches in Broadband Single Carrier Multiple Access Techniques

Channel Estimation in Wireless OFDM Systems

WLAN a Spec. (Physical Layer) 2005/04/ /4/28. WLAN Group 1

FREQUENCY DOMAIN POWER ADAPTATION SCHEME FOR MULTI-CARRIER SYSTEMS

Iterative Detection and Decoding with PIC Algorithm for MIMO-OFDM Systems

OFDM system: Discrete model Spectral efficiency Characteristics. OFDM based multiple access schemes. OFDM sensitivity to synchronization errors

DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION AND OPTIMISATION OF 4X4 MIMO-OFDM TRANSMITTER FOR

Baseline Proposal for EPoC PHY Layer

SHIV SHAKTI International Journal of in Multidisciplinary and Academic Research (SSIJMAR) Vol. 3, No. 4, August-September (ISSN )

A SURVEY ON FFT/IFFT PROCESSOR FOR HIGH SPEED WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Advanced 3G & 4G Wireless Communication Prof. Aditya K. Jaganathan Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

802.11a Hardware Implementation of an a Transmitter

Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) based Uplink Multiple Access Method over AWGN and Fading Channels

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 11, November ISSN

One Cell Reuse OFDM/TDMA using. broadband wireless access systems

Evaluation of BER and PAPR by using Different Modulation Schemes in OFDM System

Channel Estimation by 2D-Enhanced DFT Interpolation Supporting High-speed Movement

2.

Bit Loading and Peak Average Power Reduction Techniques for Adaptive Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Systems

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Technology 17 (2014 )

Next Generation Wireless Communication System

Study of Turbo Coded OFDM over Fading Channel

Performance Analysis of OFDM System with QPSK for Wireless Communication

Optimized BPSK and QAM Techniques for OFDM Systems

Chapter 2 Overview - 1 -

Orthogonal Frequency Domain Multiplexing

The Optimal Employment of CSI in COFDM-Based Receivers

Part 3. Multiple Access Methods. p. 1 ELEC6040 Mobile Radio Communications, Dept. of E.E.E., HKU

IEEE P Wireless Personal Area Networks

EE678-Application Assignment Discrete Wavelet Multitone Modulation

Fundamentals of Digital Communication

Performance Analysis of LTE System in term of SC-FDMA & OFDMA Monika Sehrawat 1, Priyanka Sharma 2 1 M.Tech Scholar, SPGOI Rohtak

CE-OFDM with a Block Channel Estimator

Survey on Effective OFDM Technology for 4G

ANALYSIS AND STUDY OF MULTI-SYMBOL ENCAPSULATED ORTHOGONAL FREQUENCY DIVISION MULTIPLEXING

Transcription:

OFDM and FFT Cairo University Faculty of Engineering Department of Electronics and Electrical Communications Dr. Karim Ossama Abbas Fall 2010

Contents OFDM and wideband communication in time and frequency domain Implementation using FFT

Frequency selective wireless channel A wireless channel with multi-path is frequency selective This frequency selectivity must be corrected at the receiver Correction is through equalization, or inversion of the channel

Naïve equalization The simplest and most direct form of equalization is to use an FIR filter The number of taps in the filter grows quadratically with the bandwidth of the channel The FIR equalizer is thus too complex to implement if the channel is too selective or too wideband

OFDM and dividing the channel In OFDM Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing the channel is divided into multiple narrowband subchannels If the bandwidth of the subchannels is narrow enough, they will each be effectively flat Thus the task of equalizing one wideband channel is changed into equalizing a large number of narrowband channels

Questions about OFDM With so many narrow channels next to each other, how can you be sure they are not interfering with each other? How is this implemented? How do you combine so many subcarriers, do you have to use as many RF chains as there are subcarriers?

The time domain equivalent problem The problem of a frequency selective channel has a timespreading analog in time-domain Thus frequency selectivity is equal to spreading of the timedomain signal waveforms This can lead to ISI

The time-domain solution OFDM divides a wideband channel into parallel narrowband ones What this means is that the symbol waveform will be wider than the original waveform (by a factor of the total bandwidth to subchannel bandwidth) Thus the effect of the same time-shift on the signal is much smaller (and can be effectively removed)

Subcarrier orthogonality The subcarriers of an OFDM system are chosen to be orthogonal What this means is that the waveforms have zero crossings at each other s maxima This leads to zero intercarrier interference!

Condition for subcarrier orthogonality Each subcarrier with information is a sinc with the first zero crossing at 1/T (symbol duration) Thus the minimum spacing between subcarriers is 1/T Thus the carrier frequencies are: fi=fc+i/t i=0,1,.,n-1

Orthogonal subcarriers On each subcarrier, a baseband modulated data stream is sent The streams are sent in parallel Another way to look at orthogonality is that any two subcarriers form an orthogonal sinusoid pair over a symbol period

Choosing subchannel bandwidth How many subcarriers should we have? Depends on: Channel bandwidth Channel selectivity Now assume that Bc (coherence bandwidth)=200khz, how many subcarriers will you use in 20MHz? 5*20e6/(200e3)=500 -> 512 Thus we assume the channel is flat only over Bc/5, this is a rule of thumb

Fighting ISI Now assume we have a delay spread of 10msec, how long as a ratio of the symbol does a guard interval need to be to remove ISI in: Single carrier 20MHz OFDM 20MHz with 512 subcarriers In single carrier -> Symbol time = 1/20e6=50nsec, guard interval is 2000% the symbol duration In OFDM the ratio is 2000/512=3.9% Thus using a guard interval to combat ISI is reasonable in OFDM

What is in the guard interval? The guard interval contains a repetition of the beginning of the OFDM symbol, called a cyclic prefix This allows a linear convolution to be equivalent to a circular convolution, the latter is much simpler in DFT

Implementation One question remaining is if we need as many RF chains as there are subcarriers The answer is of course not, examine what we do a the transmitter: We encode and baseband modulate on each subcarrier Then we have all the subcarriers in frequency domain How do you take that and transform it into one time-domain signal?

Taking the subcarriers from frequency domain to time domain What takes a sequence from f-domain to t-domain? Inverse Fourier Transform Inverse Discrete Time Fourier Transform (IDTFT) for discrete time sampled systems Inverse Discrete Fourier Transform (IDFT) deals with finite samples both in time and frequency) Inverse Fast Fourier Transform (IFFT) is an efficient implementation of IDFT Thus OFDM and FFT/IFFT always come together

Complexity of implementation At the receiver, each subcarrier will need to be inverted, this is equivalent to one complex multiplication We also need to perform the FFT, this grows in a semilog fashion The overall complexity thus grows nearly linearly For N-subcarriers the complexity is: N+Nlog2(N) complex multiplications N from equalization NlogN from the FFT

Advantages of OFDM Simple implementation using DSP FFT allows much easier equalization than a straight filter Ability to deal with bad wideband channels Allows better spectral efficiency and better overall throughput Combats delay spread The time-domain counterpart of frequency selectivity Insensitive to symbol timing errors Due to the guard interval it doesn t matter if the receiver sampling is a little off

Weak points of OFDM - PAPR OFDM has very bad Peak to average power ratio (PAPR) PAPR is defined as: Peak power in the time domain symbol / Average power of the symbol OFDM looks rather white in frequency domain due to presence of closely packed subcarriers In time-domain this leads to noise-like waveforms with high peaks relative to the mean

Sensitivity to frequency offsets OFDM s greatest strength is its immunity to timing problems However, it is extremely sensitive to offsets in frequency and phase between the transmitter and the receiver If the receiver makes an error about the center frequency, even if small, then the FFT sees all subcarrier frequencies offset Any small offset in the subcarrier frequencies leads to loss of orthogonality This is a major issue leading to severe loss in performance

Review of the 802.11n transceiver At the transmitter: Encode, puncture, parse, and interleave bits -> Move to symbol domain through constellation mapper -> Move to time domain by IFFT -> insert GI and send At the receiver: FFT to go to f-domain -> invert channel -> demap -> depuncture and deinterleave -> channel decode (recovery and synch functions additional)

DFT The Fourier Transform takes a signal from time domain to frequency domain Both signals are continuous and infinite in width 2 jft X ( f ) x( t) e dt The discrete-time Fourier transform converts a discrete time signal into a continuous frequency domain. Note that both signals are still infinitely wide j n X ( ) x( n) e n The Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) converts a finite discrete time signal into a finite discrete frequency domain. This is done by sampling frequency on the unit circle. This is very suitable for DSP since the signals are discretised and finite length N 1 2 jkn / N X k xne k N n0 0,1,..., 1

DFT complexity In DFT we compute N frequency domain points Each frequency point is calculated by performing N complex multiplications then N complex additions Thus we need N^2 complex multiplies and N^2 complex adds N 1 n 2 jkn / N n0 X x e k 0,1,..., N 1 k

FFT FFT is mathematically identical to DFT in floating point The FFT, however, is faster The complexity of FFT is O(NlogN) instead of O(N^2) This saving can vary between FFT algorithms and a solid bound is very hard to define, but the log limit is good

Cooley-Tukey The Cooley-Tukey algorithm is the most commonly used FFT algorithm Cooley-Tukey uses a divide and conquer approach towards the FFT, breaking it down into successively smaller FFT s We are going to consider the radix-2 algorithm, but higher radix algorithms are also commonly used in practice (particularly radix 4)

FFT decimation in time Step 1 Begin with normal FFT N 1 2 jkn / N X k xne k N n0 0,1,..., 1 Now divide the N-point FFT into two N/2 point FFTs One for the even and one for the odd indices (summation is linear, so there is no effect) k N/ 21 N/ 21 2 jk (2 m)/ N 2 jk (2m1)/ N 2m 2m1 m0 m0 X x e x e k 0,1,..., N 1

FFT decimation in time Step 1 Define the following: W lk N e 2 jkl / N The equations then become: N/ 21 N/ 21 2 mk (2m1) k k 2m N 2m1 N m0 m0 X x W x W k 0,1,..., N 1 N/ 21 N/ 21 2mk k 2mk k 2m N N 2m1 N m0 m0 X x W W x W k 0,1,..., N 1 k X E W O k 0,1,..., N 1 k k N k

FFT decimation in time Step 1 Each of E and O is length N/2, DFT is cyclic, thus we only calculate N/2 points each and calculate the remaining N/2 points from the first N/2 E O E k k N /2 O k k N /2 W e e e W k N / 2 2 j( k N / 2)/ N 2 jk / N jn / N N k X E W O, k 0,1,..., N / 2 1 k k N k E W O, k N / 2,..., N k k N / 2 N k N / 2 k N

What happened to complexity so far k X E W O, k 0,1,..., N / 2 1 k k N k E W O, k N / 2,..., N k kn / 2 N k N / 2 A straight DFT requires N^2 operations Here we will calculate 2 sets of N/2 point DFTs then add an additional N multiplications for the twiddle factor Complexity becomes 2(N/2)^2+N=(N^2)/2+N Projecting further, the two N/2 FFTs will be further broken into N/4 FFTs and so on leading to the logarithmic complexity

Step 1 example Consider application to an 8-point FFT

FFT decimation in time step 2 N/ 21 N/ 21 2mk k 2mk k 2m N N 2m1 N m0 m0 X x W W x W k 0,1,..., N 1 N/ 41 N/ 41 2(2 m) k 2k 2(2 m) k k 2(2 m) N N 2m1 N m0 m0 X x W W x W N/ 41 N/ 41 k 2(2 m) k 2k 2(2 m) k N 2(2m1) N N 2(2m1) 1 N m0 m0 W { x W W x W }, k 0,1,..., N 1 If the two FFT sequences are further divided into even and odd parts, then we end up with four smaller FFTs combined together in a certain order

FFT decimation in time final In its final form, the FFT is calculated from 2-point FFTs (radix 2) Further 2 point combinations yield the final 8-points

Bit-reversal Note in the full butterfly that the inputs are not in order This is necessary since the successive division into odd and even requires this

Bit reversal If the inputs are in order, the outputs will not be Choose one or the other depending on: Application Memory arrangement Connection with following and previous stages The order of the inputs is obtained by reversing the Endianess of the index 001->100 (1->4) 010->010 (2->2) 011->110 (3->6) 100->001 (4->1) 101->101 (5->5) 110->011 (6->3) 111->111 (7->7)

Bit reversal Bit reversal is useful in software implementations where sorting output vectors could be an issue In principle, hardware applications incur no additional cost to rearrange either inputs or outputs (hardwiring) However, most modern FFT circuits must support multiple subcarrier lengths, thus requiring complicated sorting circuits, this is where bit reversal could be useful

FFT and latency In an N-point FFT N samples are termed an OFDM symbol To calculate any output of the FFT we need to have all inputs N 1 2 jkn / N X k xne k N n0 0,1,..., 1 This introduces an inevitable latency to FFT = symbol duration = 4msec in 802.11n This latency is often used by later stages to buffer their own startup times If a later stage can absorb the latency by operating faster than necessary for a short period, the FFT latency effect can be removed for packets of reasonable length

FFT or IFFT From the computational point of view the two are basically the same It is thus not hard and very common (basic requirement) to find them implemented using the same circuit FFT/IFFT FFT N 1 2 jkn / N X k xne k N n0 IFFT 0,1,..., 1 1 0,1,..., 1 N 1 2 jkn / N x n X ke n N N k 0

FFT/IFFT There are two differences between the two: IFFT is scaled by N (extremely minor, constant scaling) There is a phase difference in the exponentials (major) FFT N 1 2 jkn / N X k xne k N n0 IFFT 0,1,..., 1 1 0,1,..., 1 N 1 2 jkn / N x n X ke n N N k 0

FFT/IFFT The (scaled) IFFT can be calculated by first conjugating inputs to FFT and then conjugating the outputs again Conjugate is a relatively cheap operation (sign inversion) IFFT 1 0,1,..., 1 N 1 2 jkn / N x n X ke n N N k 0 IFFT N 1 2 jkn / N X k xne k N n0 n ( FFT ( x*))* 0,1,..., 1 N 1 * ( k 2 jkn / N * ), 0,1,..., 1 k 0 Nx X e n N

n N 1 k 0 FFT/IFFT N 1 * ( k 2 jkn / N * ), 0,1,..., 1 k 0 Nx X e n N ( ( X jx )(cos(2 jkn / N) j sin(2 jkn / N))) 2 jkn / N N 1 Nx ( ( X jx )(cos j sin )) n kr ki k 0 N 1 ( X cos X sin j( X cos X sin ))* k 0 kr ki kr ki ki kr N1 N1 X cos X sin j( X kr ki ki kr k k0 k0 * cos X sin ) * X e

Linking FFT to OFDM again In OFDM, there are a number of subcarriers between which the channel is divided This is then equivalent to the symbol length which is N in FFT Standards do not specify the kind of algorithm through which DFT is implemented, only the number of subcarriers and the bandwidth

The 802.11n transceiver revisited

Receiver I Two data streams from RF (assume 2x2 MIMO) CCA: Clear channel assessment: Figure if the channel is busy and inform MAC (if not busy maybe we can send), can be on one or multiple streams AGC: Automatic gain control according to nearness of transmitter to prevent amplifier saturation (maybe only on one stream) Packet edge detection: A coarse estimate of when a packet is detected (maybe on one stream)

Receiver 2 Next the start of an OFDM packet is detected, the frequency offset of the carrier is also corrected. This is critical in OFDM (can be in time or frequency or both) To do this, the offsets are estimated from header AND pilots in frequency, time or both FFT converts to frequency domain Channel estimtation guesses H and the noise in time or frequency domain

Receiver 3 The channel estimates are used to invert the channel At this point we still have two spatial streams (Nrx=2) After channel inversion, you should be able to observe a proper constellation and see only white noise (no rotation), we have proper modulated symbols Deparsing combines the streams into one symbol stream. We are in symbol frequency domain operating at Nrx*CLK

Receiver 4 The demapper converts symbols to bits, thus operating at MNrxCLK MHz This is then dinterleaved, depunctured, and decoded into an information bitstream sent to higher layers

Assignment Assume you are working with an FPGA with complex multipliers that can be operated at 200MHz You are designing an FFT/IFFT circuit to support the 802.11n basic mode (64 subcarriers in 20MHz) Count the number of complex multipliers necessary in the circuit Draw a block diagram of the circuit implementation Briefly describe the operation of the circuit s state machine Bonus: Write a VHDL description of the circuit