Solutions for EMC Issues in Automotive System Transmission Lines

Similar documents
Solutions for EMC Issues in Automotive System Transmission Lines

Frequently Asked EMC Questions (and Answers)

Chapter 16 PCB Layout and Stackup

Design for Guaranteed EMC Compliance

Advanced Topics in EMC Design. Issue 1: The ground plane to split or not to split?

Todd H. Hubing Michelin Professor of Vehicular Electronics Clemson University

Understanding and Optimizing Electromagnetic Compatibility in Switchmode Power Supplies

EMC Design Guidelines C4ISR EQUIPMENT & SYSTEMS

BIRD 74 - recap. April 7, Minor revisions Jan. 22, 2009

Freescale Semiconductor, I

Todd Hubing. Clemson University. Cabin Environment Communication System. Controls Airbag Entertainment Systems Deployment

The Ground Myth IEEE. Bruce Archambeault, Ph.D. IBM Distinguished Engineer, IEEE Fellow 18 November 2008

11 Myths of EMI/EMC ORBEL.COM. Exploring common misconceptions and clarifying them. MYTH #1: EMI/EMC is black magic.

Top Ten EMC Problems

Class-D Audio Power Amplifiers: PCB Layout For Audio Quality, EMC & Thermal Success (Home Entertainment Devices)

EMI. Chris Herrick. Applications Engineer

Common myths, fallacies and misconceptions in Electromagnetic Compatibility and their correction.

10 Safety earthing/grounding does not help EMC at RF

PCB Design Guidelines for Reduced EMI

MINIMIZING EMI EFFECTS DURING PCB LAYOUT OF Z8/Z8PLUS CIRCUITS

AN IMPROVED MODEL FOR ESTIMATING RADIATED EMISSIONS FROM A PCB WITH ATTACHED CABLE

Power-Bus Decoupling With Embedded Capacitance in Printed Circuit Board Design

IC Decoupling and EMI Suppression using X2Y Technology

Design for EMI & ESD compliance DESIGN FOR EMI & ESD COMPLIANCE

Electro-Magnetic Interference and Electro-Magnetic Compatibility (EMI/EMC)

Non-Ideal Behavior of Components

Testing for EMC Compliance: Approaches and Techniques October 12, 2006

TECHNICAL REPORT: CVEL Investigation of the Imbalance Difference Model and its Application to Various Circuit Board and Cable Geometries

Modeling and Simulation of Powertrains for Electric and Hybrid Vehicles

3 GHz Wide Frequency Model of Surface Mount Technology (SMT) Ferrite Bead for Power/Ground and I/O Line Noise Simulation of High-speed PCB

Low Jitter, Low Emission Timing Solutions For High Speed Digital Systems. A Design Methodology

Technical Report Printed Circuit Board Decoupling Capacitor Performance For Optimum EMC Design

TECHNICAL REPORT: CVEL EMI Source Modeling of the John Deere CA6 Motor Driver. C. Zhu, A. McDowell and T. Hubing Clemson University

High Speed Clock Distribution Design Techniques for CDC 509/516/2509/2510/2516

COMPUTER modeling software based on electromagnetic

Chapter 12 Digital Circuit Radiation. Electromagnetic Compatibility Engineering. by Henry W. Ott

Antenna Matching Within an Enclosure Part II: Practical Techniques and Guidelines

EMC Design Guideline

PCB Design Guidelines for GPS chipset designs. Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5

The number of layers The number and types of planes (power and/or ground) The ordering or sequence of the layers The spacing between the layers

Decoupling capacitor placement

1. TABLE OF FIGURES APPLICATION NOTE OVERVIEW EMI...5

Investigation of Cavity Resonances in an Automobile

LVDS Owner s Manual. A General Design Guide for National s Low Voltage Differential Signaling (LVDS) Products. Moving Info with LVDS

Application Note # 5438

APPLICATION NOTE 735 Layout Considerations for Non-Isolated DC-DC Converters

Course Introduction. Content 16 pages. Learning Time 30 minutes

Automotive Systems Past and Present

MPC5606E: Design for Performance and Electromagnetic Compatibility

Designing for Board Level Electromagnetic Compatibility

Texas Instruments DisplayPort Design Guide

Unclassified Distribution A: Unlimited Public Release

Heat sink. Insulator. µp Package. Heatsink is shown with parasitic coupling.

Understanding, measuring, and reducing output noise in DC/DC switching regulators

FDTD and Experimental Investigation of EMI from Stacked-Card PCB Configurations

Decoupling capacitor uses and selection

X2Y versus CM Chokes and PI Filters. Content X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Electromagnetic Compatibility

Automotive EMC. IEEE EMC Society Melbourne Chapter October 13, 2010 By Mark Steffka IEEE EMCS Distinguished Lecturer

EMC Overview. What is EMC? Why is it Important? Case Studies. Examples of calculations used in EMC. EMC Overview 1

Microcircuit Electrical Issues

LVDS Flow Through Evaluation Boards. LVDS47/48EVK Revision 1.0

Suppression Techniques using X2Y as a Broadband EMI Filter IEEE International Symposium on EMC, Boston, MA

Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility

EUA W Mono Filterless Class-D Audio Power Amplifier DESCRIPTION FEATURES APPLICATIONS. Typical Application Circuit

Model for Estimating Radiated Emissions from a Printed Circuit Board with Attached Cables Due to Voltage-Driven Sources

PCB layout guidelines. From the IGBT team at IR September 2012

EUA2011A. Low EMI, Ultra-Low Distortion, 2.5-W Mono Filterless Class-D Audio Power Amplifier DESCRIPTION FEATURES APPLICATIONS

The theory of partial inductance is a powerful tool

EL7302. Hardware Design Guide

Top Ten EMC Problems & EMC Troubleshooting Techniques by Kenneth Wyatt, DVD, Colorado Springs Rev. 1, Feb 26, 2007

Signal integrity means clean

Differential-Mode Emissions

Verifying Simulation Results with Measurements. Scott Piper General Motors

TECHNICAL REPORT: CVEL Maximum Radiated Emission Calculator: Common-mode EMI Algorithm. Chentian Zhu and Dr. Todd Hubing. Clemson University

Signal and Noise Measurement Techniques Using Magnetic Field Probes

Techniques to reduce electromagnetic noise produced by wired electronic devices

Test and Measurement for EMC

Presented by Joanna Hill

PHY Layout APPLICATION REPORT: SLLA020. Ron Raybarman Burke S. Henehan 1394 Applications Group

Debugging EMI Using a Digital Oscilloscope. Dave Rishavy Product Manager - Oscilloscopes

PCI-EXPRESS CLOCK SOURCE. Features

EMC review for Belle II (Grounding & shielding plans) PXD DEPFET system

SN W Mono Filterless Class-D Audio Power Amplifier DESCRIPTION FEATURES APPLICATIONS. Typical Application Circuit

Using TEM Cell Measurements to Estimate the Maximum Radiation From PCBs With Cables Due to Magnetic Field Coupling

EMC Simulation of Consumer Electronic Devices

Comparison of IC Conducted Emission Measurement Methods

Analysis of a PCB-Chassis System Including Different Sizes of Multiple Planes Based on SPICE

Digital Systems Power, Speed and Packages II CMPE 650

TECHNICAL REPORT: CVEL Parasitic Inductance Cancellation for Filtering to Chassis Ground Using Surface Mount Capacitors

Course Introduction. Content: 19 pages 3 questions. Learning Time: 30 minutes

Signal Integrity, Part 1 of 3

150Hz to 1MHz magnetic field coupling to a typical shielded cable above a ground plane configuration

The Causes and Impact of EMI in Power Systems; Part 1. Chris Swartz

LM2462 Monolithic Triple 3 ns CRT Driver

Course Introduction Purpose Objectives Content Learning Time

Relationship Between Signal Integrity and EMC

ROD ANTENNA TESTING Complete article download from: EMI TESTING. Basic RE102 test (2-30 MHz)

VLSI is scaling faster than number of interface pins

Modeling of Power Planes for Improving EMC in High Speed Medical System

Transcription:

June 23, 2010 Solutions for EMC Issues in Automotive System Transmission Lines FTF-ENT-F0174 Todd Hubing Clemson University and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

Session Introduction In automotive systems, the wiring harnesses play a key role in coupling electronic noise to and from the components. Shielding and filtering of the wiring harness and connector are not generally viable options; therefore it is important to address cable coupling issues with proper board-level design practices. This presentation reviews the various cable-coupling mechanisms and grounding strategies. It also discusses the options available at the board level for ensuring that automotive components do not put excessive amounts of noise on the harness and that noise on the harness does not affect the proper operation of the component circuitry. This session is intended to help the attendees learn to design electronic components that function properly in harsh electromagnetic environments. Todd Hubing is the Michelin Professor of Vehicle Electronics at the Clemson University International Center for Automotive Research. He has over 25 years experience designing products that meet electromagnetic compatibility requirements. This session is divided into four 40-minute presentations with 10 minutes allocated for questions and one 10-minute break each hour. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 2

After completing this session you will be able to: Anticipate possible Electro Magnetic Compatibility (EMC) problems with your product designs Make design decisions affecting the cost and performance of your products Session Objectives Specify grounding and shielding requirements for your products and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 3

Agenda 14:00 1. When is a wiring harness a transmission line, and when is it just a bundle of wires? 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 2. If it s just a bundle of wires, why do I care how it s configured or routed? 3. When do wiring harnesses look like antennas? 4. How do I design automotive components to prevent harnesses from radiating? 5. How do I protect automotive components from noise or transients on the wiring harness? and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 4

When is a wiring harness a transmission line? and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 5

When is a wiring harness a transmission line? Characteristic impedance: Z 0, the ratio of voltage to current in a forward traveling wave. For a pair of wires side-by-side: μ 1 d Z0 = cosh ohms ε 2a wire spacing wire radius For a pair of wires in the same bundle: Z 0 is 100 to 300 ohms. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 6

When is a wiring harness a transmission line? Steady state solution is always the wire-pair solution If we don t care about how we get to the steady state, then we don t need to worry about transmission line solutions. In most automotive applications, we don t care! and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 7

Signal Termination Eliminating ringing with a series resistor Matched terminations and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 8

If it s just a bundle of wires, why do I care how it s configured or routed? and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 9

Common Impedance Coupling and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 10

Where does the return current flow? and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 11

Where does the return current flow? and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 12

Identify Current Paths Current takes the path of least impedance! > 100 khz - This is generally the path of least inductance < 10 khz - This is generally the path(s) of least resistance and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 13

Identify Current Paths and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 14

Identify Current Paths and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 15

Identify Current Paths Where does the 10 khz return current flow? and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 16

Conducted Coupling I 1 aka: Common Impedance Coupling R S1 R S2 + + V S1 V R R S2 RET I RET R L2 V RL2 L1 V RL1 I 2 - - Requires 2 conductor connections between the source and victim. The only mechanism that couples DC level shifts. Most likely to be dominant at low frequencies, when source and victim share a current return path. Most likely to be dominant when sources are low impedance (high current) circuits. aka also known as and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 17

Conducted Coupling Examples Lights dim and radio dies when automobile engine is started. Power bus voltage spikes are heard as audible clicks on an AM radio using the same power source. An electrostatic discharge transient resets a microprocessor causing a system to shutdown. A lightning-induced transient destroys the electronic components in a computer with a wired connection to the internet. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 18

Electric Field Coupling V RL2 S2 L2 Crosstalk = 20 log = 20 log VRL1 R 1 S2 R L2 R R + jωc 12 and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 19

Electric Field Coupling aka: Capacitive Coupling Requires 0 conductor connections between the source and victim. Coupling proportional to dv/dt. Most likely to be dominant at higher frequencies. Most likely to be dominant when sources are high impedance (high voltage) circuits. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 20

Electric Field Coupling Examples Coupling from circuit board heatsinks to cables or enclosures. AM radio interference from overhead power lines. Automotive component noise picked up by the rod antenna in CISPR 25 radiated emissions tests. Microprocessor resets due to indirect electrostatic discharges. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 21

Magnetic Field Coupling Crosstalk =20 log VRL2 ωm 12 R L2 = 20 log V R R + R + jωl RL1 when V = 0 L1 L2 S2 22 S2 and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 22

Magnetic Field Coupling aka: Inductive Coupling Requires 0 conductor connections between the source and victim. Coupling proportional to di/dt. Most likely to be dominant at higher frequencies. Most likely to be dominant when sources are low impedance (high current) circuits. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 23

Magnetic Field Coupling Examples Coupling from power transformers or fluorescent lighting ballasts. Jitter in CRT displays. 60 Hz hum in a handheld AM radio. Hard-drive corruption due to motor or transformer currents. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 24

When do wiring harnesses look like antennas? and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 25

Identifying Antennas What makes an efficient antenna? λ/2 Half-Wave Dipole Electrically Small Loop λ/4 Quarter-Wave Monopole Size Two Halves and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 26

Identifying Antennas Good Antenna Parts Poor Antenna Parts <100 MHz >100 MHz <100 MHz >100 MHz Cables Heatsinks Power planes Tall components Seams in shielding enclosures Microstrip or stripline traces Anything that is not big Microstrip or stripline traces Free-space wavelength at 100 MHz is 3 meters and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 27

Identifying Antennas Common-Mode vs. Differential Mode Δz E max = 1.26 10 6 I c fδz r s E max = 1.32 10 14 I d f 2 r sδz = 4 10 6 I d fδz s r λ and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 28

How are common-mode currents induced on cables? Voltage-Driven Mechanism Heatsink ~ VDM Noise voltage V CM ~ Cable Equivalent voltage V CM C V C board r = 0.2234 heatsin k = VDM DM max C C board heatsin k Fboard Fcable E and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 29

How are common-mode currents induced on cables? Current-Driven Mechanism Signal current loop induces a voltage between two good antenna parts. - Vcm + At 10 MHz and higher, milliamps of current flowing in a ground plane produces millivolts of voltage across the ground plane. A few millivolts driving a resonant antenna can result in radiated fields exceeding FCC limits. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 30

How are common-mode currents induced on cables? Direct-Coupling Mechanism Signals coupled to I/O lines can carry high frequency (HF) power off the board. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 31

How are common-mode currents induced on cables? DM-to-CM conversion due to cable and load imbalance and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 32

How do I design components to prevent harnesses from radiating? Don t rely on EMC Design Guidelines Be familiar with currents and current paths Learn to recognize good electromagnetic interference (EMI) sources Learn to recognize good antennas Be aware of fundamental EMI radiation mechanisms and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 33

Don t Rely on EMC Design Guidelines Board Level Trace routing No trace unrelated to I/O should be located between an I/O connector and the device(s) sending and receiving signals using that connector. All power planes and traces should be routed on the same layer. A trace with a propagation delay more than half the transition time of the signal it carries must have a matched termination. Capacitively-loaded nets must have a total source impedance equal to or greater than one-quarter of the line characteristic impedance or a series resistor must be added to meet this condition. Nets driven at faster than 1V/ns slew rate must have a discrete series resistor at the source. Guard traces should be used to isolate high-speed nets from I/O nets. Guard traces should be connected to the ground plane with vias located less than one-quarter wavelength apart at the highest frequency of interest. All power and ground traces must be at least three times the nominal signal line width. This does not include guard traces. If a ground or power separation is required, the gap must be at least 3 mm wide. Additional decoupling capacitors should be placed on both sides of a power or ground plane gap. Critical nets should be routed in a daisy chain fashion with no stubs or branches. Critical nets should be routed at least 2X from the board edge, where X is the distance between the trace and its return current path. Signals with high-frequency content should not be routed beneath components used for board I/O. Differential pairs radiate much less than single-ended signals even when the traces in the pair are separated by many times their distance above a ground plane. However, imbalance in the pair can result in radiation comparable to an equivalent single-ended signal. The length of high-frequency nets should be minimized. The number of vias in high-frequency nets should be minimized. On a board with power and ground planes, no traces should be used to connect to power or ground. Connections should be made using a via adjacent to the power or ground pad of the component. Gaps or slots in the ground plane should be avoided. They should ONLY be used in situations where it is necessary to control the flow of low-frequency (i.e. less than 100 khz) currents. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 34

EE371 Design Problem and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 35

EMC Design Guideline Collection http://www.cvel.clemson.edu/emc/tutorials/guidelines.html and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 36

Identify Current Paths Where does the 56 MHz return current flow? and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 37

Control Transition Times t f t f Control transition times of digital signals! and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 38

Control Transition Times CMOS Driver Model CMOS Input Model and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 39

Control Transition Times Digital Signal Currents in CMOS Circuits t f t f Control transition times of digital signals: Can use a series resistor or ferrite when load is capacitive. Use appropriate logic for fast signals with matched loads. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 40

Control Transition Times Reducing risetime with a series resistor Reducing risetime with a parallel capacitor Good idea Bad idea and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 41

Noise Sources and Coupling Mechanisms and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 42

Identify Sources Clocks Digital Data Analog signals Power supply switching Arcing Parasitic oscillations Narrow band, consistent Not as narrow as clocks, but clock frequency is usually identifiable. Bandwidth determined by signal source, consistent Appears broadband, but harmonics of switching frequency can be identified, consistent Broadband, intermittent Narrowband, possibly intermittent and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 43

Identify Sources Active Devices (Power Pins) For some ICs, the high-frequency currents drawn from the power pins can be much greater than the high-frequency currents in the signals! and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 44

Identify Sources Noise on the low-speed I/O For some ICs, significant high-frequency currents appear on low-speed I/O including outputs that never change state during normal operation! and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 45

Circuit Board Grounding, Filtering and Shielding and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 46

Ground vs. Signal Return AGND Whenever I see more than one of these symbols on the schematic, I know there is [EMC] work for us here. T. Van Doren DGND and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 47

Ground vs. Signal Return The purpose of a system ground is to provide a reference voltage and/or a safe path for fault currents. Signal currents flowing on a ground conductor can prevent a ground conductor from serving its intended purpose. Don t confuse ground conductors with signal return conductors. Rules for the routing of ground may conflict with the rules for routing signal or power returns. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 48

Ground vs. Signal Return Circuit boards should have high-frequency ground! Why? Conductors referenced to different grounds can be good antennas. Signals referenced to two different grounds will be noisy (i.e., include the noise voltage between the two grounds.) Layouts with more than one ground are more difficult, require more space, and present more opportunities for critical mistakes. Excuses for employing more than one ground are generally based on inaccurate or out-dated information. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 49

Ground vs. Signal Return If grounds are divided, it is generally to control the flow of lowfrequency (<100 khz) currents. For example, Isolating battery negative (i.e. chassis ground) from digital ground Isolating digital ground from analog ground in audio circuits. This can be necessary at times to prevent common impedance coupling between circuits with low-frequency high-current signals and other sensitive electronic circuits. HOWEVER, it is still necessary to ensure that there is only 1 highfrequency ground. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 50

Ground vs. Signal Return Exercise: Trace the path of the digital and analog return currents. D/A and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 51

Ground vs. Signal Return Exercise: Trace the path of the digital and analog return currents. D/A and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 52

Ground vs. Signal Return Exercise: Trace the path of the digital and analog return currents. D/A and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 53

Ground vs. Signal Return Design Exercise: What is wrong with this design and how would you improve it? and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 54

Lateral Isolation Chassis GND Rarely appropriate Analog GND Often the source of significant problems Digital GND and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 55

Vertical Isolation Digital GND Analog GND Chassis GND Only one plane usually needs to be full size. One or zero vias should connect planes with different labels. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 56

Ground vs. Signal Return You don t need to gap a plane to control the flow of high frequency (> 1 MHz) currents. If you provide a low-inductance path for these currents to take, they will confine themselves to this path very well. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 57

Ground vs. Signal Return Rules for gapping a ground plane: 1. Don t do it! 2. If you must do it, never ever allow a trace or another plane to cross over the gap. 3. If you must do it, never ever place a gap between two connectors. 4. Remember that the conductors on either side of the gap are at different potentials. 5. See Rule #1! and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 58

and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 59

Sensitive A/D Isolation ONE VIA Analog GND Digital GND Digital GND If you think you need two vias, then you shouldn t be isolating the analog and digital grounds. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 60

Provide a Good HF Chassis Ground at the Connector Cables and enclosures are both good antenna parts. If they are not held to the same potential, they are likely to create a radiation problem. Exceptions: When there is no chassis ground When there are no connectors with cables Note: Sometimes low-frequency isolation between chassis and digital ground is necessary control the flow of low-frequency currents. However, even in these situations it is usually important to provide a good high-frequency connection. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 61

Isolating Chassis and Digital Grounds and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 62

Better implementation Caps with traces and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 63

Filtering Low-Pass Filters and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 64

Filtering Design Exercise: Which low-pass filter is most appropriate in each case? and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 65

Filtering Parasitics and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 66

Filtering with Two Capacitors Two capacitors more than twice as good as one. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 67

Shielding Electric Field Shielding and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 68

Shielding Magnetic Field Shielding (at low frequencies) and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 69

Shielding Magnetic Field Shielding (at high frequencies) and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 70

Shielding Enclosure Shielding and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 71

DC Power Distribution and Decoupling and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 72

The Concept of Power Bus Decoupling L P V board V supply L G Power Supply Printed Circuit Board and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 73

The Concept of Power Bus Decoupling L P V board V inductance V inductance V supply L G Power Supply Printed Circuit Board and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 74

The Concept of Power Bus Decoupling L trace L trace C d C d L d L d C b L trace L trace and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 75

Effective Strategies for Choosing and Locating Printed Circuit Board Decoupling Capacitors and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 76

Rules for PCB Decoupling? Use small-valued capacitors for high-frequency decoupling. Locate capacitors near the power pins of active devices. Avoid capacitors with a low ESR! Run traces from device to capacitor, then to power planes. Location of decoupling capacitors is not relevant. Use the largest valued capacitors you can find in a given package size. Use 0.01 μf for local decoupling! Use capacitors with a low ESR! Use 0.001 μf for local decoupling! Locate capacitors near the ground pins of active devices. Never put traces on decoupling capacitors. Local decoupling capacitors should have a range of values from 100 pf to 1 μf! and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 77

How much capacitance do you need? Impedance approach L trace L trace Z max ( f ) V = I NOISEMAX DEVICEMAX ( f ) ( f ) Ltrace C b Ltrace Z max 1 2 π 1 f C 2πfL trace 1 = Z 2πf C C 0 min max = 1 2πf Z 0 0 max = 1 (2πf ) 2 L source f0 f 1 and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 78

Capacitance Ratio Approach How much capacitance do you need? Recognizing that CMOS loads are capacitances, we are simply using decoupling capacitors to charge load capacitances. Total decoupling capacitance is set to a value that is equal to the total device capacitance times the power bus voltage divided by the maximum power bus noise. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 79

How much capacitance do you need? Guidelines approach Let s do it the way that worked for somebody at sometime in the past. include one 0.01 uf local decoupling capacitor for each VCC pin of every active component on the board plus 1 bulk decoupling capacitor with a value equal to 5 times the sum of the local decoupling capacitance.. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 80

Printed Circuit Board Decoupling Strategies and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 81

Boards with Closely Spaced Power Planes C b C d C d Power Distribution Model ~ (5-500 MHz) Board with power and ground planes and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 82

Boards with Closely Spaced Power Planes C = 3.4 nf B L = 5 nh BULK L = 2nH D C BULK = 1 μ F C = 10nF D Bare Board 100. 10. 1. Board with decoupling 0.1 0.1 MHz 1 MHz 10 MHz 100 MHz 1 GHz and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 83

For Boards with Closely-Spaced Planes The location of the decoupling capacitors is not critical. The value of the local decoupling capacitors is not critical, but it must be greater than the interplane capacitance. The inductance of the connection is the most important parameter of a local decoupling capacitor. None of the local decoupling capacitors are effective above a couple hundred megahertz. None of the local decoupling capacitors are supplying significant charge in the first few nanoseconds of a transition. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 84

and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 85

Inductance of Connections to Planes On boards with closely spaced power and ground planes: Generally speaking, 100 decoupling capacitors connected through 1 nh of inductance will be as effective as 500 decoupling capacitors connected through 5 nh of inductance. 5 nh 0.5 nh and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 86

Power Bus Decoupling Strategy With closely spaced (<.25 mm) planes Size bulk decoupling to meet board requirements Size local decoupling to meet board requirements Mount local decoupling in most convenient locations Don t put traces on capacitor pads Too much capacitance is ok Too much inductance is not ok References: T. H. Hubing, J. L. Drewniak, T. P. Van Doren, and D. Hockanson, Power Bus Decoupling on Multilayer Printed Circuit Boards, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. EMC-37, no. 2, May 1995, pp. 155-166. T. Zeeff and T. Hubing, Reducing power bus impedance at resonance with lossy components, IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging, vol. 25, no. 2, May 2002, pp. 307-310. M. Xu, T. Hubing, J. Chen, T. Van Doren, J. Drewniak and R. DuBroff, Power bus decoupling with embedded capacitance in printed circuit board design, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 45, no. 1, Feb. 2003, pp. 22-30. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 87

Boards with Power Planes Spaced >0.5 mm C b C d C d and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 88

Boards with Power Planes Spaced >0.5 mm M L TRACE L VIA L VIA L TRACE PORT 1 PORT 2 C BOARD ACTIVE DEVICE DECOUPLING CAPACITOR LOOP A LOOP A and LOOP B SIGNAL PLANE POWER PLANE GROUND PLANE SIGNAL PLANE On boards with a spacing between power and ground planes of ~30 mils (0.75 mm) or more, the inductance of the planes can no longer be neglected. In particular, the mutual inductance between the vias of the active device and the vias of the decoupling capacitor is important. The mutual inductance will tend to cause the majority of the current to be drawn from the nearest decoupling capacitor and not from the planes. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 89

Where do I mount the capacitor? Here? V CC GND Here? POWER GND and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 90

and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 91

For Boards with Widely-Spaced Planes Local decoupling capacitors should be located as close to the active device as possible (near pin attached to most distant plane). The value of the local decoupling capacitors should be 10,000 pf or greater. The inductance of the connection is the most important parameter of a local decoupling capacitor. Local decoupling capacitors can be effective up to 1 GHz or higher if they are connected properly. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 92

and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 93

Power Bus Decoupling Strategy With Widely Spaced (>.5 mm) Planes: Size bulk decoupling to meet board requirements Size local decoupling to meet device requirements Mount local decoupling near pin connected to furthest plane Don t put traces on capacitor pads Too much capacitance is ok Too much inductance is not ok References: J. Chen, M. Xu, T. Hubing, J. Drewniak, T. Van Doren, and R. DuBroff, Experimental evaluation of power bus decoupling on a 4-layer printed circuit board, Proc. of the 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Washington D.C., August 2000, pp. 335-338. T. H. Hubing, T. P. Van Doren, F. Sha, J. L. Drewniak, and M. Wilhelm, An Experimental Investigation of 4-Layer Printed Circuit Board Decoupling, Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Atlanta, GA, August 1995, pp. 308-312. J. Fan, J. Drewniak, J. Knighten, N. Smith, A. Orlandi, T. Van Doren, T. Hubing and R. DuBroff, Quantifying SMT Decoupling Capacitor Placement in DC Power-Bus Design for Multilayer PCBs, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. EMC-43, no. 4, Nov. 2001, pp. 588-599. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 94

Power Bus Decoupling Strategy With No Power Plane: Layout low-inductance power distribution Size bulk decoupling to meet board requirements Size local decoupling to meet device requirements Two caps can be much better than one Avoid resonances by minimizing inductance References: T. Hubing, Printed Circuit Board Power Bus Decoupling, LG Journal of Production Engineering, vol. 3, no. 12, December 2000, pp. 17-20. (Korean language publication). T. Zeeff, T. Hubing, T. Van Doren and D. Pommerenke, Analysis of simple two-capacitor low-pass filters, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 45, no. 4, Nov. 2003, pp. 595-601. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 95

Power Bus Decoupling Strategy Low-impedance Planes or Traces? Choice is based on bandwidth and board complexity Planes are not always the best choice It is possible to achieve good decoupling either way Trace inductance may limit current to active devices Planes Widely Spaced or Closely Spaced? Want local or global decoupling? Want stripline traces? Lower impedances are obtainable with closely spaced planes. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 96

Embedded Capacitance Input impedance of a populated 2 x 3 board with a plane separation of about 5 microns: and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 97

Decoupling Myth In order to be effective, capacitors must be located within a radius of the active device equal to the distance a wave can travel in the transition time of the circuitry. On boards with closely spaced planes (where this rule is normally applied) none of the capacitors on the board can typically respond within the transition time of the circuitry no matter where they are located. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 98

Decoupling Myth Smaller valued capacitors (i.e. 10 pf) respond faster than higher valued capacitors. The ability of a capacitor to supply current quickly is determined by its mounted inductance. The value of the capacitance only affects its ability to respond over longer periods of time. For a given value of inductance, higher valued capacitors are more effective for decoupling. and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 99

Printed Circuit Board Layout Guidelines Design rules won t make you a good circuit board designer: Use common sense! Visualize signal current paths Locate antennas and crosstalk paths Be aware of potential EMI sources and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 100

Example Design Example: How would you modify this design? and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 101

Example Design Example: A much better design and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 102

Example Design Example: How would you modify this design? and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 103

Design Review Keep signal loop areas small Don t locate circuitry between connectors Control transition times in digital signals Never cut gaps in a solid return plane and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 104

Avoid right angle corners on traces. 20-H rule Multiple decoupling cap values or traces on caps Maximum trace lengths on striplines or microstrip traces Other design rules you may have heard of, but shouldn t be too concerned with and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 105

Design Example and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 106

Design Example and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 107

Design Example 2 and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 108

Design Examples and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 109

Summary Don t rely on design guidelines! Use common sense Visualize signal current paths Locate antennas and crosstalk paths Be aware of potential EMI sources Ask other engineers to review your designs and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 110

How do I protect components from transients on the harness? Design Exercise: Where should the transient protection be grounded? OR Digital GND Chassis GND and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 111

Diodes 0.5 volts to ~10 volts Lowest Energy High Capacitance (10 s of pf) Usually fail short Voltage limiting device and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 112

Varistors 0.5 volts to 10 s of volts Low Energy Higher Capacitance (10 s of pf) Usually fail short Voltage limiting device and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 113

Thyristors 0.5 volts to 10 s of volts Medium Energy Higher Capacitance (10 s of pf) Fail open or short Crowbar device and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 114

Gas Discharge Tubes 10 s of volts to 1000 s of volts High Energy Low Capacitance (< 1 pf) Fail open Crowbar device and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 115

Session Review 1. When is a wiring harness a transmission line, and when is it just a bundle of wires? 2. If it s just a bundle of wires, why do I care how it s configured or routed? 3. When do wiring harnesses look like antennas? 4. How do I design automotive components to prevent harnesses from radiating? 5. How do I protect automotive components from noise or transients on the wiring harness? and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 116

For Further Information Cited Referenfces regarding Power Bus Decoupling Strategy: T. H. Hubing, J. L. Drewniak, T. P. Van Doren, and D. Hockanson, Power Bus Decoupling on Multilayer Printed Circuit Boards, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. EMC-37, no. 2, May 1995, pp. 155-166. T. Zeeff and T. Hubing, Reducing power bus impedance at resonance with lossy components, IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging, vol. 25, no. 2, May 2002, pp. 307-310. M. Xu, T. Hubing, J. Chen, T. Van Doren, J. Drewniak and R. DuBroff, Power bus decoupling with embedded capacitance in printed circuit board design, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 45, no. 1, Feb. 2003, pp. 22-30. J. Chen, M. Xu, T. Hubing, J. Drewniak, T. Van Doren, and R. DuBroff, Experimental evaluation of power bus decoupling on a 4- layer printed circuit board, Proc. of the 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Washington D.C., August 2000, pp. 335-338. T. H. Hubing, T. P. Van Doren, F. Sha, J. L. Drewniak, and M. Wilhelm, An Experimental Investigation of 4-Layer Printed Circuit Board Decoupling, Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Atlanta, GA, August 1995, pp. 308-312. J. Fan, J. Drewniak, J. Knighten, N. Smith, A. Orlandi, T. Van Doren, T. Hubing and R. DuBroff, Quantifying SMT Decoupling Capacitor Placement in DC Power-Bus Design for Multilayer PCBs, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. EMC-43, no. 4, Nov. 2001, pp. 588-599. T. Hubing, Printed Circuit Board Power Bus Decoupling, LG Journal of Production Engineering, vol. 3, no. 12, December 2000, pp. 17-20. (Korean language publication). T. Zeeff, T. Hubing, T. Van Doren and D. Pommerenke, Analysis of simple two-capacitor low-pass filters, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 45, no. 4, Nov. 2003, pp. 595-601. EMC Guideline Collection: http://www.cvel.clemson.edu/emc/tutorials/guidelines.html and VortiQa are trademarks of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 117