Optically Pumped Quantum M X Magnetometers: Digital Measurement of the M X Resonance Frequency in a Rapidly Varying Field

Similar documents
Magnetometer Based on a Pair of Symmetric Transitions in the 87 Rb Hyperfine Structure

Optically Pumped Quantum Magnetometer with Combined Advantages of M X and M Z Devices

Quantum frequency standard Priority: Filing: Grant: Publication: Description

Chapter 1. Overview. 1.1 Introduction

레이저의주파수안정화방법및그응용 박상언 ( 한국표준과학연구원, 길이시간센터 )

Small, Low Power, High Performance Magnetometers

NMR Basics. Lecture 2

New Ideology of All-Optical Microwave Systems Based on the Use of Semiconductor Laser as a Down-Converter.

Application Note (A12)

Optical cesium beam clock for eprtc telecom applications

Photonic Magnetometry at a (Short) Distance

First results of a high performance optically-pumped cesium beam clock

EXP 9 ESR (Electron Spin Resonance)

Powerful Single-Frequency Laser System based on a Cu-laser pumped Dye Laser

Laser Locking with Doppler-free Saturated Absorption Spectroscopy

DETECTING THE RATIO OF I AC

Multi-photon Absorption in Optical Pumping of Rubidium

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE LASER DIODE PUMPED RUBIDIUM MASER

Performance of the Prototype NLC RF Phase and Timing Distribution System *

Advanced Optical Communications Prof. R. K. Shevgaonkar Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

OTHER FEI PRODUCTS. FE-102A - CRYSTAL OSCILLATOR MHz WITH LOW PHASE NOISE: -172 dbc

DIODE LASER SPECTROSCOPY (160309)

High-power semiconductor lasers for applications requiring GHz linewidth source

Optical phase-locked loop for coherent transmission over 500 km using heterodyne detection with fiber lasers

Spectrometer using a tunable diode laser

A Prototype Wire Position Monitoring System

Characteristics of absorption and dispersion for rubidium D 2 lines with the modulation transfer spectrum

Local Oscillator Phase Noise and its effect on Receiver Performance C. John Grebenkemper

14.2 Photodiodes 411

Notes on Optical Amplifiers

Chlorophyll a/b-chlorophyll a sensor for the Biophysical Oceanographic Sensor Array

TECHNICAL MANUAL TM0110-2

Figure 4.1 Vector representation of magnetic field.

Background (~EE369B)

Supplementary Figures

Biomedical Research 2017; Special Issue: ISSN X

THE BENEFITS OF DSP LOCK-IN AMPLIFIERS

USING LASER DIODE INSTABILITIES FOR CHIP- SCALE STABLE FREQUENCY REFERENCES

Development of a new Q-meter module

Optical Pumping Control Unit

Localization of microscale devices in vivo using addressable transmitters operated as magnetic spins

A HIGH PRECISION QUARTZ OSCILLATOR WITH PERFORMANCE COMPARABLE TO RUBIDIUM OSCILLATORS IN MANY RESPECTS

A COMPACT, AGILE, LOW-PHASE-NOISE FREQUENCY SOURCE WITH AM, FM AND PULSE MODULATION CAPABILITIES

R. J. Jones Optical Sciences OPTI 511L Fall 2017

Optical generation of frequency stable mm-wave radiation using diode laser pumped Nd:YAG lasers

Development of high-sensitivity magnetometer for EDM experiment with 129 Xe spin oscillator

Notes on Noise Reduction

Introduction. sig. ref. sig

Simple System for Active Frequency Stabilization of a Diode Laser in an External Cavity

Low-Level RF. S. Simrock, DESY. MAC mtg, May 05 Stefan Simrock DESY

Detecting the Ratio of I ac. /I ave. photoelastic modulators

Supplementary Discussion 1: NV center level diagram

Achieving accurate measurements of large DC currents

Solid-State Laser Engineering

Phase-Lock Techniques for Phase and Frequency Control of Semiconductor Lasers

FIBER OPTICS. Prof. R.K. Shevgaonkar. Department of Electrical Engineering. Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture: 20

Part 2: Second order systems: cantilever response

10. Phase Cycling and Pulsed Field Gradients Introduction to Phase Cycling - Quadrature images

ECEN620: Network Theory Broadband Circuit Design Fall 2014

Supplementary Materials for

An EPR Primer 2. Basic EPR Theory 2.1. Introduction to Spectroscopy 2.1.1

Zeeman Shifted Modulation Transfer Spectroscopy in Atomic Cesium

PHY3902 PHY3904. Nuclear magnetic resonance Laboratory Protocol

Chapter 3 Experimental study and optimization of OPLLs

Data Processing at the Flaw Detector with Combined Multisector Eddy-Current Transducer

Magnetic field modulation spectroscopy of rubidium atoms

PHASELOCK TECHNIQUES INTERSCIENCE. Third Edition. FLOYD M. GARDNER Consulting Engineer Palo Alto, California A JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.

Nd:YSO resonator array Transmission spectrum (a. u.) Supplementary Figure 1. An array of nano-beam resonators fabricated in Nd:YSO.

JEDI. Status of the commissioning of the waveguide RF Wien Filter

The steeper the phase shift as a function of frequency φ(ω) the more stable the frequency of oscillation

Design considerations for the RF phase reference distribution system for X-ray FEL and TESLA

Fringe Parameter Estimation and Fringe Tracking. Mark Colavita 7/8/2003

Spectral Phase Modulation and chirped pulse amplification in High Gain Harmonic Generation

Electron Spin Resonance v2.0

Installation and Characterization of the Advanced LIGO 200 Watt PSL

CCTF 2012 Report on Time & Frequency activities at National Physical Laboratory, India (NPLI)

STABILITY CONSIDERATIONS

Enhancing FPGA-based Systems with Programmable Oscillators

DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW OPTICALLY PUMPED POTASIUM MAGNETOMETER

Direct frequency comb saturation spectroscopy with an ultradense tooth spacing of 100 Hz D. A. Long, 1,* A. J. Fleisher, 1 and J. T.

A new picosecond Laser pulse generation method.

Diode Laser Control Electronics. Diode Laser Locking and Linewidth Narrowing. Rudolf Neuhaus, Ph.D. TOPTICA Photonics AG

Spurious-Mode Suppression in Optoelectronic Oscillators

Linear Time-Invariant Systems

A review of Pound-Drever-Hall laser frequency locking

Investigation of Detection of Microwave Radiation in Ferromagnetic YIG

Phase Noise Modeling of Opto-Mechanical Oscillators

Energy Transfer and Message Filtering in Chaos Communications Using Injection locked Laser Diodes

FIBER OPTICS. Prof. R.K. Shevgaonkar. Department of Electrical Engineering. Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture: 18.

Sources classification

Understanding the Magnetic Resonance Spectrum of Nitrogen Vacancy Centers in an Ensemble of Randomly-Oriented Nanodiamonds, Supporting Information

In a typical biological sample the concentration of the solute is 1 mm or less. In many situations,

8.5 Modulation of Signals

Magnetic characterization of CoFe-based glass covered amorphous wires at high frequency. G. Ababei 1,2, H. Chiriac 1

Optical Phase Lock Loop (OPLL) with Tunable Frequency Offset for Distributed Optical Sensing Applications

Digital Dual Mixer Time Difference for Sub-Nanosecond Time Synchronization in Ethernet

Nonlinear Optics (WiSe 2015/16) Lecture 9: December 11, 2015

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

INF4420 Phase locked loops

ELEC3242 Communications Engineering Laboratory Frequency Shift Keying (FSK)

Transcription:

ISSN 1063-7842 Technical Physics 2006 Vol. 51 No. 7 pp. 924 928. Pleiades Publishing Inc. 2006. Original Russian Text A.K. Vershovskiœ A.S. Pazgalev 2006 published in Zhurnal Tekhnicheskoœ Fiziki 2006 Vol. 76 No. 7 pp. 108 112. Optically Pumped Quantum M X Magnetometers: Digital Measurement of the M X Resonance Frequency in a Rapidly Varying Field A. K. Vershovskiœ and A. S. Pazgalev Ioffe Physicotechnical Institute Russian Academy of Sciences Politekhnicheskaya ul. 26 St. Petersburg 194021 Russia e-mail: antver@mail.ioffer.ru Received December 28 2005 Abstract A new way of digitally constructing a phase-locked loop for an optically pumped quantum M X magnetometer is suggested. It provides a high accuracy and speed of magnetic resonance frequency tracking in a rapidly varying field. PACS numbers: 07.55.Ge DOI: 10.1134/S1063784206070188 EXPERIMENTAL INSTRUMENTS AND TECHNIQUES PROBLEM DEFINITION Optically pumped quantum M X magnetometers (OPQMs) measure the frequency of forced oscillations of the total atomic magnetic moment transverse component [1]. In the OPQM the atomic resonance signal arises when the frequency of a microwave field applied to a cell with alkali metal atoms coincides with the frequency of an atomic transition. In this case the pumping radiation intensity transmitted through the cell becomes modulated with the modulation frequency being equal to the applied microwave field and the phase of modulation being dependent on the offset of the microwave frequency from the atomic resonance frequency. This effect is central for detecting atomic resonances with optically pumped magnetometers which offer a much higher sensitivity than their proton counterparts: one quantum of the atom-absorbed microwave field yields one photon having a 10 9 times higher energy. OPQMs of the highest sensitivity use alkali metal (cesium rubidium or potassium) atoms as a working substance. Isotopes 133 Cs and 87 Rb used in cesium and rubidium magnetometers exhibit a small quadratic Zeeman splitting; therefore in typical terrestrial fields the resonance lines of the atom merge into one broad (about 20 nt wide) symmetric band whose shape and position depend on the pumping parameters orientation of the device in the magnetic field etc. Isotope 39 K and especially isotope 41 K exhibit a much larger quadratic Zeeman splitting. In the terrestrial magnetic field the resonance lines of the K atoms are well resolved and the linewidth may be decreased to 0.2 nt. That is why the absolute accuracy and long-term stability of potassium magnetometers are much higher than those of cesium and rubidium ones. The price for the improved characteristics is a complex resonance pattern consisting of several lines which makes it necessary to apply computer-aided techniques of signal analysis and microwave resonance field frequency synthesis. In this work we suggest a digital way of constructing a phase-locked loop for optically pumped quantum M X magnetometers that provides a high accuracy and speed of identification both of a single line (cesium magnetometer in the terrestrial magnetic field) and of a complex structure consisting of very narrow lines (potassium magnetometer). In terms of magnetic resonance excitation OPQMs are categorized as self-excited devices where the photocurrent amplifier is directly connected to the rf field coil by a feedback loop and devices where the phaselocked loop (PLL) is directly tuned to the resonance. Magnetometers of either type are characterized by errors including parameter-drift-related shifts of the resonance itself and inaccuracies in measuring the position of the resonance line center. The basic source of inaccuracies in both types of M X magnetometers is mistuning of the PLL which causes a frequency offset of the output signal. Therefore the phase of the applied microwave field and the phase of the magnetic moment precession signal recorded by the photodetector must be accurately matched. Self-excited magnetometers though simple in design need a frequency meter capable of rapidly measuring the frequency of the inevitably noisy signal with an extremely high accuracy (for potassium OPQMs the requirements are as follows: the frequency range 100 700 khz and an accuracy of (2 5) 10 9 for a measure- 924

OPTICALLY PUMPED QUANTUM M X MAGNETOMETERS 925 ment time of 0.1 s). The signal to be measured from PLL OPQMs is much less noisy. Moreover if a digital frequency synthesizer is used as an oscillator in the PLL a precision frequency meter becomes unneeded: in this case measurement of the oscillator frequency is replaced by digitization of control sequences at the inputs of the synthesizer. Below we will concentrate on PLL magnetometers. Here the error signal controlling a tunable oscillator (a voltage-controlled oscillator in analog schemes or a digital frequency synthesizer in digital schemes) is separated out with a phase detector in which the reference voltage phase is set using a phase shifter so as to compensate for all phase shifts due to delays in the measuring channel and detector geometry (namely the orientation of the pumping beam and rf field coil). In this work we describe an approach to constructing a digital phase-pocked loop that makes it possible to compensate for all the shifts mentioned above. For the theory of digital PLL construction which is today well developed see [2]. DIGITAL PHASE SHIFTER OPERATION Let us estimate a desired accuracy of tuning the phase signal. Signal S(t) due to a transition between magnetic sublevels in a microwave field of amplitude H 1 and frequency ω superposed on uniform magnetic field H 0 is described by the Bloch equation [3] the stationary solution to which in the complex form is given by St () Aω = --------- 1 i ------------- + δz e i( ωt + ϕ) = S 0 e iωt. (1) Here S 0 is the complex amplitude of the M X resonance signal δ = (ω ω 0 )/ΓZ is the reduced offset of microwave frequency ω from resonance frequency ω 0 = γh 0 ϕ is an extra shift of the resonance phase associated with phase shifts in the measuring channel and with the geometry of the experiment A is the resonance signal amplitude 2Γ = 2/T 2 is the resonance width Z = (1 + ω 1 2 T 1 T 2 ) is the resonance saturation factor ω 1 = 1/2γH 1 is the Rabi frequency γ is the gyromagnetic ratio for the working substance and T 1 and T 2 are the times of longitudinal and transverse magnetic moment relaxation. Suppose that we detect the signal with two identical phase detectors one of which (let it be detector x) is in phase with the microwave field and the other (detector y) is out of phase by 90. Then the output signals of phase detectors x and y averaged over characteristic time τ (τ 1/ω) are expressed as = k Aω 1 --------- x( δϕ ) = k ReS 0 1 δz ------------- sinϕ + ------------- cosϕ (2a) = k Aω 1 --------- where f '(t) = f(t)e iα and in reverse sequence. This is true if after initial function f(t) has been detected by square-law synchronous detectors x and y phase rotay( δϕ ) = k ImS 0 δz 1 ------------- sinϕ + ------------- cosϕ (2b) where k is the transfer coefficient common to both detectors. At ϕ = 0 components x(δ 0) and y(δ 0) represent respectively a Lorentz dispersion contour with a zero value at a zero offset and a Lorentz absorption contour with a maximum at a zero offset. Signal component x(δ 0) is used as an error signal which the PLL tends to nullify. Component y(δ 0) can be used as a signal amplitude indicator at a zero offset. To establish a correspondence between the frequency shift and phase shift in the closed PLL we equate the right of (2a) to zero to obtain tanϕ = δz. In other words a phase shift by 45 introduces an error of about a half-linewidth. Typically the half-linewidth in potassium OPQMs is 1 nt and their ultimate accuracy which is limited by the parametric-drift-related instability of M X resonance is on the order of 10 pt. Therefore for the potential of the potassium OPQM to be realized completely the phase offset must not exceed arctan(1/100) = 0.6. However the phase shift to be compensated for by the phase shifter may vary from 0 to 180 or more depending on the signal frequency signal channel length time delay of the signal in the photodetector etc. Thus the problem of constructing a controlled analog phase shifter capable of providing such parameters for the flat amplitude frequency response in the frequency range 100 700 khz is practically unsolvable. Basically a signal with any reference phase can be detected by digital methods provided that the rate of digital data processing is sufficiently high. Specifically for a potassium OPQM in the terrestrial magnetic field this means real-time signal digitization and processing with a rate of 10 7 10 8 cps which also seems problematic even if high-end signal processors are applied. We suggest a digital way of signal phase rotation (in synchronous detection schemes) through arbitrary angle α. It is based on the fact that for any harmonic function f() t = ( a+ ib)e iωt se i ωt + ϕ ( ) phase rotation through angle α and phase detection by square-law synchronous detectors x' and y' at frequency ω show the commutative property; i.e. these operations may be accomplished both in direct sequence x' = k f' () t cosωt y' = k f' () t sinωt (3)

926 VERSHOVSKIŒ PAZGALEV tion through angle α can be accomplished by calculating the linear combination x' = xcosα ysinα (4) y' = xsinα + ycos α where x = k f(t)cosωt and y = k f(t)sinωt. It is easy to check that transformations (3) and (4) yield the same result x' = ka [ cosα bsinα] = kscos( ϕ+ α) (5) y' = ka [ sinα + bcosα] = kssin ( ϕ+ α) but transformation (4) does not require the phase rotation of the signal at frequency ω. Let us clarify this point by the example of the magnetic resonance signal. Expressions (2) describe the output voltages of two phase detectors in the absence of phase shifters. If these voltages were integrated with time constant τ they are free of components at frequencies higher than 1/τ and so can be digitized with a measurement period ~τ. For τ = 5 10 ms digitization can be made with a rate of (5 10) 10 3 cps using e.g. a 10-bit ADC built in an 8-bit general-purpose microcontroller. Having digitized voltages x(δ ϕ) and y(δ ϕ) we in accordance with (4) make up (now using digital means of the microcontroller) their linear combinations introducing a new parameter virtual phase angle ψ x' ( δϕψ ) = x( δϕ ) cosψ y' ( δϕψ ) = x( δϕ ) sinψ + y( δϕ ) sinψ y( δϕ ) cos ψ. (6) We obtain two new virtual signals which can be conveniently assigned to the outputs of two virtual detectors x' an y'. As follows from (2) and (6) x' ( δϕψ ) = x( δϕ + ψ) (7) y' ( δϕψ ) = y( δϕ + ψ). Thus we realized digitally (by software) an additional rotation of the signal phase through angle ψ. With phase ψ such that ψ = ϕ the output of virtual detector x' can be used as an error signal and that of detector y' has then the meaning of the signal amplitude. Thus our next goal is to set phase ψ = ϕ equal to ϕ i.e. to tune the virtual phase shifter. If phase shift ϕ is not known in advance it can be estimated by the method of invariant mapping of the spin precession signal [4]. After the coarse adjustment of the phase the system locks in resonance and then the phase shift is accurately measured by the modulation method. A change in the phase shift in response to a change in resonance frequency ω is taken into account in the form ϕ(ω) = ω 0 + ωt d where ϕ 0 is the phase shift due to the field coil configuration and T d is the effective delay of the signal in the signal channel. The amount of error involved in such a method of phase shift compensation depends on the shift measurement inaccuracy (which in turn wholly depends on the magnetic field variation at the time of measurement) and the instability of the digital phase shifter. The latter depends on the instability of the phase relation between two outputs of the digital frequency synthesizer and on the (e.g. temperature-induced) instability of the relation between the transfer coefficients of detectors x and y. The absolute error of the digital phase shifter fabricated using advanced technologies can be reduced down to 0.1. EXPERIMENT Following the concepts stated in the previous section we fabricated and tested a potassium OPQM with a digitally controlled PLL shown in Fig. 1. The PLL is free of analog tuning units: the functions of M X resonance recognition and locking are performed by a microprocessor-controlled frequency synthesizer. The basic components of the PLL are a signal amplifier phase detectors x and y (implemented as analog multipliers with low-pass second-order filters) a microcontroller with ADCs at the inputs that is clocked by a stable quartz oscillator and a digital frequency synthesizer with two square-law outputs phase-shifted strictly by 90. The voltages from the square-law outputs are applied to the phase detectors as reference signals. Initially the synthesizer generates a microwave field at a far-from-resonance frequency. The variable component of the signal picked up from the detector is used to calibrate the zeros of the phase detectors. After calibration (lasting about 0.8 s) the processor starts searching for the resonance i.e. scans the frequency of the synthesizer. The scan direction is selected such that the strongest (for a given configuration of the device) lowfrequency resonance in the potassium atomic structure (F = 2 m F = 1 2) is excited first. Scanning is continued until the variable component of the signal from the detector becomes appreciable. Then the processor locks the frequency of the synthesizer. If the signal is lost the processor searches for the resonance and locks it again. The input signal is sampled with a rate of 5120 Hz. After each sampling the frequency of the synthesizer is adjusted at the same rate with the step proportional to the error signal at the output of virtual detector x'. The minimal step of the synthesizer in terms of the magnetic field strength is H = 0.17 pt. Significantly the digital frequency synthesizer used in our work allows for continuous time variation of the phase of the generated voltage as the synthesized frequency varies. Over one measurement cycle T = 0.1 s the registers of the processor accumulate and average 512 counts of the synthesizer frequency. The result of averaging is converted to a serial code and transmitted to the user computer along with data for the output voltages of the phase detectors feedback state etc.

OPTICALLY PUMPED QUANTUM M X MAGNETOMETERS 927 Signal Amplifier Phase detector x Phase detector y Microcontroller ADC ADC Reference quartz oscillator 90 0 Control Algorithm: scan control lock control etc. x' Digital phase shifter y' Integrating amplifier Digital frequency synthesizer Microwave field 0.1 s averaging Output data Fig. 1. Functional diagram of the digital phase-locked loop. Sensitivity δh of the magnetometer for time t is basically limited by photocurrent shot noise intensity N recorded by the photodetector δh ~ N(t)/(AγT 2 ). The effective resolving power of the system depends only on the shot noise intensity and remains independent of the step of the synthesizer for as long as the contribution of photocurrent short noise intensity δh measured for one measurement cycle exceeds step H of the synthesizer. Under this condition averaging of a discrete data array measured over time period T improves the resolving power in proportion to T/t. Thus the ultimate resolving power of the recording system related to the discreteness of the synthesizer s step equals H/ 512 = 7 ft for a measurement time of 0.1 s and does not limit the sensitivity of the magnetometer. If necessary the microcontroller slowly scans the synthesizer frequency about the resonance center to digitize the resonance line shape (Fig. 2) and then finely tune the phase. The curves in Fig. 2 are the outputs of virtual detectors x' and y' after tuning phase shift ψ as a result of scanning the microwave frequency in the stabilized field. A way of representing the resonance in the form of an ellipse on plane x'y' is given in [3]. Such a representation makes it possible to measure the shift of the resonance phase in a rapidly varying field. The PLL itself was implemented by software using the scheme of a proportional integrating amplifier. In the feedback loop the amplification coefficients of the amplifier operating in the proportional and integrating modes are specified by software. For given signal parameters these coefficients control the speed and intrinsic noise of the PLL. The digital PLL was tested using an M X resonance signal electronic simulator (a series circuit consisting of a quartz cavity and a controllable white noise generator) in a three-layer magnetic screen and in a magnetic field stabilizer. The tests with the signal simulator where the white noise level was varied with the resonance parameters fixed showed that the noise of the digital PLL depends on the input signal noise until the sensitivity becomes equal to 0.3 pt in terms of the variance for a measurement time of 0.1 s. The speed of the magnetometer with the digital PLL was tested in the magnetic screen. To this end a variable magnetic field of amplitude 45 nt and frequency ranging from 0 to 100 Hz was imposed on the uniform magnetic field. At a count rate of 10 cps the frequency band was tracked accurate to 3.5 Hz and the detectable magnetic field variation was 5000 nt/s or less. In searching for the resonance the magnetic field scan rate was also equal to 5000 nt/s: it was shown that even such a scan rate provides resonance locking. The resolving power of the potassium OPQM with the digital PLL was tested in the magnetic field stabilizer. Figure 3 presents the Allan diagram of the magnetic field in the stabilizer. The variation is minimal H min = 4 x' 3 2 S 3 2 1 1 1 2 3 4 1 y' 2 3 4 H nt Fig. 2. M X resonance line in the magnetic screen.

928 Allan variance pt 10 1 VERSHOVSKIŒ PAZGALEV might well contribute to the Allan variation over short measurement times. 10 0 10 1 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 T s Fig. 3. Allan diagram of the magnetic field in the stabilizer. 0.23 pt in terms of the variance for a measurement time of 5 s; for a measurement time of 0.1 s H = 3.3 pt (in terms of the variance). Of course these values include the field variation in the stabilizer. Attention should be paid to the slope of the Allan diagram: it corresponds to the case when the amount of variation is in inverse proportion to the averaging time (rather than being in direct proportion to the square root of the averaging time as it must be for Gaussian-type shot noise). This indicates the presence either of extra high-frequency noise in the PLL or of separate high-frequency components in the magnetic field spectrum. Specifically the amplitude of the magnetic field variable component of frequency 50 Hz ranged from 200 to 250 pt (in terms of the variance) during the experiment and so CONCLUSIONS The most attractive feature of digitally constructed schemes intended for M X resonance frequency measurement in a variable field is that they are totally free of analog phase shifters and therefore offer a several orders of magnitude higher accuracy and long-term stability of the magnetometer. In addition with such schemes a high sensitivity and speed peculiar to the optically pumped quantum magnetometer may be shown in full measure. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank E.B. Aleksandrov for interest shown in this work and also V.Ya. Shifrin and E.N. Choporova for assistance in conducting the experiments. REFERENCES 1. N. M. Pomerantsev V. M. Ryzhkov G. V. Skrotskiœ Physical Principles of Quantum Magnetometry (Nauka Moscow 1972) [in Russian]. 2. Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing (Prentice Hall New Jersey 1993). 3. F. Bloch Phys. Rev. 70 460 (1946). 4. A. K. Vershovskiœ and E. B. Aleksandrov Opt. Spektrosk. 100 23 (2006) [Opt. Spectrosc. 100 (2006) (in press)]. Translated by V. Isaakyan