R&D Toward Brighter X-ray FELs

Similar documents
Zhirong Huang. May 12, 2011

Seeding at LCLS FEL. J. Welch, (SLAC) J. Welch (SLAC), Joint DESY and University of Hamburg Accelerator Physics Seminar, Feb. 5, 2013, DESY Hamburg

Introduction to the Physics of Free-Electron Lasers

1-Å FEL Oscillator with ERL Beams

Demonstration of exponential growth and saturation at VUV wavelengths at the TESLA Test Facility Free-Electron Laser. P. Castro for the TTF-FEL team

Spectral characterization of the FERMI pulses in the presence of electron-beam phase-space modulations

Status, perspectives, and lessons from FLASH and European XFEL

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 6 Apr 2016

Outline of the proposed JLAMP VUV/soft X-ray FEL and the challenges for the photon beamlines and optics

TECHNICAL CHALLENGES OF THE LCLS-II CW X-RAY FEL *

X-ray FEL Oscillator (XFEL-O) Gun Requirements and R&D Overview FLS2010: WG5: High Brightness Guns March 1, 2010

FLASH at DESY. FLASH. Free-Electron Laser in Hamburg. The first soft X-ray FEL operating two undulator beamlines simultaneously

Mode-locked multichromatic x-rays in a seeded free-electron laser for single-shot x-ray spectroscopy

Extending the photon energy coverage of an x-ray self-seeding FEL. via the reverse taper enhanced harmonic generation technique

OVERVIEW OF SEEDING METHODS FOR FELS

Eliminating the microbunching-instabilityinduced sideband in a soft x-ray self-seeding free-electron laser

GRATING MONOCHROMATOR FOR SOFT X-RAY SELF-SEEDING THE EUROPEAN XFEL

Generation of Coherent X-Ray Radiation Through Modulation Compression

Wisconsin FEL Initiative

Evidence of High Harmonics from Echo-Enabled Harmonic Generation for Seeding X-ray Free Electron Lasers

Generating Isolated Terawatt-Attosecond X-ray Pulses via a Chirped. Laser Enhanced High-Gain Free-electron Laser

CLARA: A new particle accelerator test facility for the UK

X-ray Science at the Femtosecond to Attosecond Frontier Workshop Program Updated: 12MAY09

FLASH: Status and upgrade

Review of Coherent SASE Schemes

Review of Coherent SASE Schemes

Generating coherent soft x-ray pulses in the water window with a high-brightness seeded free-electron laser

SwissFEL Design and Status

Beam Diagnostics, Low Level RF and Feedback for Room Temperature FELs. Josef Frisch Pohang, March 14, 2011

ELECTRON BEAM DIAGNOSTICS AND FEEDBACK FOR THE LCLS-II*

FLASH Upgrade. Decrease wavelength and/or increase brilliance

FLASH performance after the upgrade. Josef Feldhaus

Note on the LCLS Laser Heater Review Report

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 20 Jan 2010

Commissioning the Echo-Seeding Experiment ECHO-7 at NLCTA

THz Pump Beam for LCLS. Henrik Loos. LCLS Hard X-Ray Upgrade Workshop July 29-31, 2009

Bioimaging of cells and tissues using accelerator-based sources

Nonintercepting Diagnostics for Transverse Beam Properties: from Rings to ERLs

Optimization of TW XFELs. C. Emma Physics and applications of high efficiency free electron lasers workshop April 11 UCLA

On-line spectrometer for FEL radiation at

C. Addi'onal FEL topics

BEAM DIAGNOSTICS AT THE VUV-FEL FACILITY

The Potential for the Development of the X-Ray Free Electron Laser

Does the short pulse mode need energy recovery?

FLASH II. FLASH II: a second undulator line and future test bed for FEL development.

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.acc-ph] 18 Jul 2003

12/08/2003 H. Schlarb, DESY, Hamburg

Status of the APEX Project at LBNL

Status of the Project

LCLS Injector Diagnostics. Henrik Loos. Diagnostics overview Transverse Beam Properties Longitudinal Beam Properties

LCLS project update. John Arthur. LCLS Photon Systems Manager

Mitigation Plans for the Microbunching-Instability-Related COTR at ASTA/FNAL

LCLS-II-HE Instrumentation

BEAM ECHO EFFECT FOR GENERATION OF SHORT-WAVELENGTH RADIATION

FLASH 2. FEL seminar. Charge: 0.5 nc. Juliane Rönsch-Schulenburg Overview of FLASH 2 Hamburg,

Feedback Requirements for SASE FELS. Henrik Loos, SLAC IPAC 2010, Kyoto, Japan

High Repetition Rate Inverse Compton Scattering Source

Infrared Single Shot Diagnostics for the Longitudinal. Profile of the Electron Bunches at FLASH. Disputation

ERLP Status. Mike Dykes

H. Weise, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg, Germany for the XFEL Group

Using Higher Order Modes in the Superconducting TESLA Cavities for Diagnostics at DESY

Undulator K-Parameter Measurements at LCLS

Several Issues and Questions for Discussion Related to HGHG cascade

FLASH Operation at DESY From a Test Accelerator to a User Facility

Attosecond Diagnostics of Muti GeV Electron Beams Using W Band Deflectors

Beam Arrival Time Monitors. Josef Frisch, IBIC Sept. 15, 2015

COTR Diagnostics and Sources of Microbunching. Alex Lumpkin, Fermilab Presented at Microbunching Instability Workshop College Park, MD April 13, 2012

ERL based FELs. Todd I Smith Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratories (HEPL) Stanford University Stanford, CA

Advanced Beam Instrumentation and Diagnostics for FELs

Dinner at 6.30 pm Napa Valley Grille Glendon Ave Ste 100, Los Angeles

2 TTF/FLASH in the XFEL context

Synchronization Overview

BEAM ARRIVAL TIME MONITORS

LUCX - THZ PROGRAM: OVERVIEW AND PROSPECTS

RF-based Synchronization of the Seed and Pump-Probe Lasers to the Optical Synchronization System at FLASH

3 General layout of the XFEL Facility

TECHNIQUES FOR PUMP-PROBE SYNCHRONISATION OF FSEC RADIATION PULSES

TIME-PRESERVING MONOCHROMATORS FOR ULTRASHORT EXTREME-ULTRAVIOLET PULSES

Wir schaffen Wissen heute für morgen

Performance study of a soft X-ray harmonic generation FEL seeded with an EUV laser pulse

Terawatt-Isolated Attosecond X-ray Pulse Using a Tapered X-ray Free Electron Laser

VELA PHOTOINJECTOR LASER. E.W. Snedden, Lasers and Diagnostics Group

Femtosecond Synchronization of Laser Systems for the LCLS

Photon Beamlines and Diagnostics at LCLS

Seeding, Controlling and Benefiting from Microbunching Instability

Diagnostics for Free Electron Lasers. Josef Frisch

Conceptual Design Report. 11 Electron Beam Diagnostics. Synopsis. Chapter 11 - Beam Instrumentation

UPGRADE PLANS FOR THE SHORT-PULSE FACILITY AT DELTA

Photon Diagnostics. FLASH User Workshop 08.

Short-Pulse X-ray at the Advanced Photon Source Overview

FLASH II: an Overview

Physics Requirements Document Document Title: SCRF 1.3 GHz Cryomodule Document Number: LCLSII-4.1-PR-0146-R0 Page 1 of 7

SCS Optical Laser Delivery

Status on Pulsed Timing Distribution Systems and Implementations at DESY, FERMI and XFEL

ALICE SRF SYSTEM COMMISSIONING EXPERIENCE A. Wheelhouse ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory

THz meets X-rays: Matthias C. Hoffmann, LCLS Laser Science & Technology Division SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, 94025

Drive Laser State-of-the-art: Performance, Stability and Programmable Repetition Rate The Jefferson Lab Experience

A novel High Average Power High Brightness Soft X-ray Source using a Thin Disk Laser System for optimized Laser Produced Plasma Generation

New generation Laser amplifier system for FEL applications at DESY.

Transcription:

Some R&D Toward Brighter X-ray FELs Zhirong Huang (SLAC) March 6, 2012 FLS2012 Workshop, Jefferson Lab

Outline Introduction Seeding for temporal coherence Hard x-rays Soft x-rays Push for higher power High peak power High average power Control of x-ray properties Temporal shape Polarization Summary

Where are we now (hard x-rays) SASE wavelength range: 25 1.2 Å Photon energy range: 0.5-10 kev Pulse length (5-100 fs FWHM) Pulse energy up to 4 mj ~95% accelerator availability Spring-8 SACLA 2011 SASE Wavelength range: 3 0.6 Å Photon energy range: 4-20 kev Pulse length (10 fs FWHM) Pulse energy up to 1 mj more XFELs to come 3

Where are we now (soft x-rays) FLASH 2011 SASE wavelength range 4.1 45 nm Average single pulse energy 10 400 µj Pulse duration (FWHM) 50 200 fs Peak power (from av.) 1 3 GW Average power (example for 3000 pulses/sec) ~ 300 mw Spectral width (FWHM) ~ 0.7-2 % Average Brilliance 10 17 10 21 * Peak Brilliance 10 29 10 31 *

X-ray FEL Parameters Now and Future (C. Pellegrini et al) Parameter Now Future Photon energy, kev Up to 20 Up to 100 Pulse repetition rate, Hz 120 10 2-10 6 Pulse duration, fs ~2-300 <1-1000 Coherence, transverse Coherence, longitudinal diffraction limited not transform limited diffraction limited transform limited Coherent photons/pulse 2x10 12-3x10 13 10 9-10 14 Peak brightness, ph/s mm 2 mrad 2 0.1% bandwidth Average Brightness, ph/s mm 2 mrad 2 0.1% bandwidth Polarization 10 33 10 30-10 34 4x10 22 10 18-10 27 linear variable, linear to circular red: parameter space to be developed

Outline Introduction Seeding for temporal coherence Hard x-rays Soft x-rays Push for higher power High peak power High average power Control of x-ray properties Temporal structure Polarization Summary

Self-Seeding Originally proposed at DESY (J. Feldhaus et al, NIMA, 1997) First undulator generates SASE X-ray monochromator filters SASE and generates seed Second undulator amplifies seed to saturation chicane 1 st undulator 2 nd undulator grazing mirrors FEL SASE FEL slit Seeded FEL grating Chicane delays electrons and washes out SASE microbunching Long x-ray path delay (~10 ps) requires large chicane that take space and may degrade beam quality

Hard x-ray self-seeding 1 GW 25 GW 15 51 16 17 31 Geloni, Kocharyan, Saldin (DESY) FEL spectrum after diamond crystal 10 5 Power dist. after diamond crystal Monochromatic seed power 5 MW Wide-band power Self-seeding of 1- m e pulse at 1.5 Å yields 10 4 BW with low charge mode 6 m 20 fs 8

HXRSS at LCLS (replacing U16) Bragg diagnostic with camera Chicane magnet X-rays P. Emma (SLAC/LBL) A. Zholents (ANL) Diamond mono chamber 9

Self-Seeding works! Single shot SASE and Seeded FEL spectra Single shot pulse energy from the gas detectors

https://sites.google.com/a/lbl.gov/realizing-the-potential-of-seeded-fels-in-the-softx-ray-regime-workshop/agenda/home

Soft X-Ray Self-Seeding LCLS is developing a compact grating monochromator and chicane that is similar to HXRSS unit in size 1.2 m Grating Mirror 3 Mirror 1 Slit Mirror 2 Fit within the length of one undulator module 4 m. Photon energy range 400-1000 ev. X-ray and electron delay varies from 660-850 fs. Resolving power from 7800 (400 ev) to 4800 (1000 ev). P. Heimann s talk at FEL working group

Echo-Enabled Harmonic Generation G. Stupakov, PRL 2009 One optical cycle Separated energy bands Separated current spikes Very high harmonic bunching may be produced from external laser Demonstration experiments at SLAC and SINAP look promising High harmonic bunching may seed a soft x-ray FELs (a few nm wavelength) 13

Laser modulation ~ 15 kev Fit to decay of HGHG bunching ~ 4 kev Echo-7 at NLCTA (intensity at 227 nm) HGHG suppressed by E TCAV1 Echo-7 signal when laser-2 on Future Plans (Echo-75): Demonstrate technology for direct laser seeding at 3nm (from 200 nm) T. Raubenheimer, D. Xiang, et al.,

Another seeding route: short-wavelength HHG Peak power (W) 1.E+09 1.E+08 1.E+07 1.E+06 1.E+05 Aim to develop a well controlled HHG seed in this region Required peak power 800nm, 50mJ, Ne (Takahashi, APL 2004) 800nm + 400nm, 2.8mJ (Kim, APL 2008) 400nm, 1mJ, Ar (Falcao-Filho, APL 2011)) 400nm, 1mJ, Ne (Falcao-Filho, APL 2011) 400nm, 1mJ, He (Falcao-Filho, APL 2011) 800nm, 0.6mJ, Ar (Falcao-Filho, APL 2011) 800nm, 2mJ, Ne (Falcao-Filho, APL 2011) 800nm, 2mJ, He (Falcao-Filho, APL 2011) 800nm, 1.5mJ, Xe (Constant, PRL 1999) 800nm, 1.5mJ, Ar (Constant, PRL 1999) 1.55um, 2.2mJ, Ne (Takahashi, PRL 2008) 1.65um, 200mJ, Ne,ESTIMATED (Takahashi, APB 2010) 1.E+04 1.E+03 10 100 Energy (ev) 15 J. Robinson, W. White

16 A. Fry, LBL seeding workshop

Outline Introduction Seeding for temporal coherence Hard x-rays Soft x-rays Push for higher power High peak power High average power Control of x-ray properties Temporal structure Polarization Summary 17

Taper to enhance FEL efficiency FEL saturates due to significant E-loss Tapered undulator keeps FEL resonance and increase power e-beam x-rays Taper works much better for a seeded FEL than SASE Taper seeded Taper SASE Notaper SASE 400 GW LLNL microwave FEL T. Orzechowski et al. PRL (1986) W. Fawley, Z. Huang et al. NIMA (2002)

Self-seeding + Tapered undulator TW FEL 8.3 kev -- 1.5 Å (13.64 GeV) 200 m LCLS-II undulator LCLS low charge parameters Optimized tapering starts at 16 m with 13 % K decreasing to 200 m 1.3 TW over 10 fs ~10 13 photons 1.0 x 10 4 FWHMBW After self-seeding crystal W. Fawley, J. Frisch, Z. Huang, Y. Jiao, H.-D. Nuhn, C. Pellegrini, S. Reiche, J. Wu (FEL2011)

Similar approach to enhance LCLS power Enhanced taper + adding 5-7 existing LCLS undulators (20-30 m) can boost the LCLS power by a factor of 10 U17-33 U 34-40? After seeding crystal 20 J. Wu

High-average power XFEL High average power electron beam distributed to an array of FELs from high reprate injector and CW SCRF linac (e.g., NGLS, J. Corlett s talk) Beam spreader High-brightness, high rep-rate gun and injector CW superconducting linac, laser heater, bunch compressor Array of independent FELs LBL APEX gun JLAB CW SCRF cavity and cryomodule 21

Reaching High-average x-ray power For a 1-2 GeV linac, FEL saturation power at ~1 GW level, or 100 uj pulse energy for a 100-fs x-ray pulse High-rep. rate (1 MHz) operation yields 100 W average x-ray power Combine self-seeding (works at full rate) and tapered undulator 1 kw average x-ray power Chicane SASE section Grating mono Seeded section Tapered section 22

Outline Introduction Seeding for temporal coherence Hard x-rays Soft x-rays Push for higher power High peak power High average power Control of x-ray properties Temporal structure Polarization Summary 23

Smaller charge, shorter x-rays gun heater TCAV0 L0 L1S L1X 3 wires 2 OTR 3 OTR 3 wires z 1 L2-linac z 2 3 OTR DL1 BC1 stopper TCAV3 4 wire scanners L3-linac old screen BSY wall 4 wire scanners + 4 collimators vert. dump DL2 undulator BL signal FEL signal 20 pc FEL measured 20 pc bunch length

Ultra-low charge for attosecond pulses C. Pellegrini, S. Reiche, J. Rosenzweig, FLS2010

Slotted foil for x-ray pulse length control 2-Pulse Production with 2 slots 0.25 mm 0-6 mm P. Emma et al., PRL 2004 26 Power (GW) 10 5 0 pulses not coherent 0-150 fs 2 fs time (fs)

Cross-correlation with e and x-ray pulses Chicane FEL signal e- 1 st undulator x-ray 2 nd undulator 23 fs 15 fs Cross-correlation technique suggested By Geloni, Kachayan, Saldin 27 Y. Ding, P. Emma

Two-color, two attosecond pulse generation 28

Polarization control Key technology is undulator with switchable polarization Cost and tolerance for long FEL undulator line lead to considerations of polarization afterburner Planar + Helical Stable >90% polarization Slow switching Planar (x) operate near saturation ~4 or 5 L G helical Pol. Und. Planar + Crossed Planar ~80% polarization May have fluctuations Fast switching Planar (x) planar mode (y ) operate near saturation ~1.3L G for P x = P y fast polarization control with pulsed phase shifter

DELTA undulator Delta undulator is a novel, compact design that fits to existing LCLS girder LCLS plans to build and test a 3.2-m Delta @ U33 in two years Degree of circular polarization for 1 DELTA ~70% at soft x-rays. Adding 1 or 2 more DELTA in future provides >90% polarization Vacuum chamber Controls & Software Driver Driver Support Support Existing Girder (U33) Cornell Delta undulator (A. Temnykh) H.-D. Nuhn, E. Kraft

Summary XFELs represent a revolution in light source development. Seeding will bring radial improvements to such revolutionary machines. Tapered undulator after a seeded FEL has the potential of generating very high FEL power. Techniques to control x-ray pulse shapes and polarization states should be fully developed.