THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM

Similar documents
GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEMS (GNSS) ECE 2526E Tuesday, 24 April 2018

Proceedings of Al-Azhar Engineering 7 th International Conference Cairo, April 7-10, 2003.

36. Global Positioning System

S a t e l l i t e T i m e a n d L o c a t i o n. N o v e m b e r John Fischer VP Advanced R&D

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS. Knowing where and when

PRINCIPLES AND FUNCTIONING OF GPS/ DGPS /ETS ER A. K. ATABUDHI, ORSAC

Lecture-1 CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION TO GPS

Introduction to NAVSTAR GPS

FieldGenius Technical Notes GPS Terminology

The GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM James R. Clynch February 2006

What is a GPS How does GPS work? GPS Segments GPS P osition Position Position Accuracy Accuracy Accuracy GPS A pplications Applications Applications

Principal Investigator Co-Principal Investigator Co-Principal Investigator Prof. Talat Ahmad Vice-Chancellor Jamia Millia Islamia Delhi

Introduction to the Global Positioning System

Experiences with Fugro's Real Time GPS/GLONASS Orbit/Clock Decimeter Level Precise Positioning System

GE 113 REMOTE SENSING

RESOLUTION MSC.233(82) (adopted on 5 December 2006) ADOPTION OF THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR SHIPBORNE GALILEO RECEIVER EQUIPMENT

Tracking New Signals from Space GPS Modernization and Trimble R-Track Technology

Lecture 04. Elements of Global Positioning Systems

Primer on GPS Operations

Problem Areas of DGPS

ORBITAL NAVIGATION SYSTEMS PRESENT AND FUTURE TENDS

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M *

Chapter 6 GPS Relative Positioning Determination Concepts

Introduction. Global Positioning System. GPS - Intro. Space Segment. GPS - Intro. Space Segment - Contd..

GNSS Signal Structures

DEFINING THE FUTURE OF SATELLITE SURVEYING WITH TRIMBLE R-TRACK TECHNOLOGY

RESOLUTION MSC.112(73) (adopted on 1 December 2000) ADOPTION OF THE REVISED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR SHIPBORNE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS)

King AbdulAziz University. Faculty of Environmental Design. Geomatics Department. Mobile GIS GEOM 427. Lecture 3

The Global Positioning System

Introduction to the Global Positioning System

UNIT 1 - introduction to GPS

Basics of Satellite Navigation an Elementary Introduction Prof. Dr. Bernhard Hofmann-Wellenhof Graz, University of Technology, Austria

UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY Institute for Environment & Human Security (UNU-EHS) Bonn, Germany

GPS Milestones, cont. GPS Milestones. The Global Positioning Sytem, Part 1 10/10/2017. M. Helper, GEO 327G/386G, UT Austin 1. US GPS Facts of Note

GPS and Recent Alternatives for Localisation. Dr. Thierry Peynot Australian Centre for Field Robotics The University of Sydney

GPS: The Basics. Darrell R. Dean, Jr. Civil and Environmental Engineering West Virginia University. Expected Learning Outcomes for GPS

Resection. We can measure direction in the real world! Lecture 10: Position Determination. Resection Example: Isola, Slovenia. Professor Keith Clarke

GPS Errors. Figure 1. Four satellites are required to determine a GPS position.

NAVIGATION USING THE ALTITUDE AND AZIMUTH OF AN ARTIFICIAL SATELLITE

UNIT 26 ELECTRONIC AIDS TO NAVIGATION

Chapter 4 DGPS REQUIREMENTS AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION

FOR THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS CIVIL WORKS(U) ARMY ENGINEER TOPOGRAPHIC LABS FORT BELVOIR VA K D ROBERTSON FEB 85 UNCLASSIFIED ETL-R-06B F.

Satellite Navigation (and positioning)

The Next Generation of Secure Position, Navigation and Timing Technology

USB GPS Dongle 65 channels With AGPS Function User s Manual

EGNOS status and performance in the context of marine navigation requirements

Using GPS in Embedded Applications Pascal Stang Stanford University - EE281 November 28, 2000

What is GPS? GPS Position Accuracy. GPS Applications. What is a GPS. How does GPS work? GPS Segments

NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources

Shared Use of DGPS for DP and Survey Operations

The topic we are going to see in this unit, the global positioning system, is not directly related with the computer networks we use everyday, but it

Performance Evaluation of Differential Global Navigation Satellite System with RTK Corrections

EUROPEAN GNSS (GALILEO) INITIAL SERVICES NAVIGATION SOLUTIONS POWERED BY E U R O P E OPEN SERVICE QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE REPORT

السلطة البحرية االردنية Jordan Maritime Authority

Stand Alone Rudder Angle Indicator System

Canadian Coast Guard Review to Implement a Resilient Position, Navigation and Timing Solution for Canada. Mariners Workshop January 31 st, 2018

Sperry Marine Northrop Grumman

GPS Case ESD.85. Angela Ho Alex Mozdzanowska Christine Ng. Illustration by Leo Cronin. October 31, ESD.85 GPS Case 1.

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS

GNSS in Maritime and Education in Egypt

Sources of Error in Satellite Navigation Positioning

Keywords. DECCA, OMEGA, VOR, INS, Integrated systems

Introduction to Geographic Information Science. Last Lecture. Today s Outline. Geography 4103 / GNSS/GPS Technology

Chapter 3 Solution to Problems

CARRIER PHASE VS. CODE PHASE

Skylark OSD V4.0 USER MANUAL

RESOLUTION MSC.401(95) (Adopted on 8 June 2015) PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR MULTI-SYSTEM SHIPBORNE RADIONAVIGATION RECEIVERS

Hydroacoustic Aided Inertial Navigation System - HAIN A New Reference for DP

How is GPS Used in Farming? Equipment Guidance Systems

POLISH MARITIME DGPS REFERENCE STATIONS COVERAGE AFTER THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW FREQUENCY NET PRELIMINARY RESULTS.

Introduction to Total Station and GPS

TEST YOUR SATELLITE NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE ON YOUR ANDROID DEVICE GLOSSARY

Integrating SAASM GPS and Inertial Navigation: What to Know

Sw earth Dw Direct wave GRw Ground reflected wave Sw Surface wave

NAVIGATION INSTRUMENTS - BASICS

The FEI-Zyfer Family of Modular, GPS-Aided Time & Frequency Systems

Protection Augmentation Toughness and Alternatives of GNSS. Melaha 2016 Concord Al-Salam Hotel Cairo, April 25,2016 Refaat Rashad

PHINS, An All-In-One Sensor for DP Applications

GPS (GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM)

Lecture 03. Introduction to Global Positioning Systems

What s up with WAAS?

Dimov Stojče Ilčev. CNS Systems

DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE October 7-8, Sensors II. Redundancy in Dynamic Positioning Systems Based on Satellite Navigation

GNSS 101 Bringing It Down To Earth

Arctic Navigation Issues. e-nav conference Nordic Institute of Navigation Bergen, March 5 th 2009

SENSORS SESSION. Operational GNSS Integrity. By Arne Rinnan, Nina Gundersen, Marit E. Sigmond, Jan K. Nilsen

IMO WORLD-WIDE RADIONAVIGATION SYSTEM (WWRNS) GALILEO receiver performance standards. Submitted by the European Commission

Swath Guidance Technology. Ron C. Johnson

Emerging Subsea Networks

STANDARD REPORT FORMAT FOR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) RECEIVERS AND SYSTEMS ACCURACY TESTS AND EVALUATIONS

Dynamic Positioning TCommittee

Entity Tracking and Surveillance using the Modified Biometric System, GPS-3

The transponder and emergency locator transmitter

Appendix D Brief GPS Overview

Sounding the Atmosphere Ground Support for GNSS Radio-Occultation Processing

Mobile Security Fall 2015

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA (Question ITU-R 210/7)

MARINE TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY. DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE, HOUSTON September 28-30, Advances in DGPS Systems

A GLONASS Observation Message Compatible With The Compact Measurement Record Format

Ian D Souza (1), David Martin (2)

Transcription:

International H ydrographie Review, M onaco, LXIII (2), July 1986 THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM by Thom as A. STANSELL, Jr. (*) Paper presented a t the Europort 85 Congress, A m sterdam, N etherlands, N ovem ber 1985, a n d reproduced with perm ission. SYNOPSIS GPS, the Global Positioning System, will rapidly becom e the most widely used radionavigation system in the world when it becomes operational later in this decade. The advantages of GPS (e.g., excellent accuracy, worldwide availability, all-w eather perform ance, and operational sim plicity) will assure its rapid acceptance, and the large m arket thus generated will assure many equipm ent choices and attractive prices. This paper describes the current GPS developm ent status, including an evaluation of the progress being made tow ard full deploym ent. The paper next explores the surprising num ber of interim GPS applications making use o f the present constellation of test and evaluation Navstar satellites. Differential GPS, which can provide navigational accuracy o f five meters in local areas, will be evaluated and progress toward standardization of signal form ats discussed. Finally, this paper looks toward the future, projecting when GPS will be ready for widespread use and predicting some of the types of equipm ent which will be available. GPS BACKGROUND (This p a p er originally was prepared f o r the E uroport Conference a n d was p re sen ted on 13 N ovem ber 1985 in A m sterdam. This was p rio r to the 28 January 1986 space shuttle disaster. A s o f this revision (April 1986) it is still not possible to predict the fu l l im pact o f th is tragedy on the sa tellite dep lo ym en t schedule. Therefore, the original artw ork has not been revised, b u t p arenthical co m m en ts have been a d d e d to the original text where appropriate). (*) M agnavox A dvanced P roducts an d System s C om pany, 2829 M a rico p a Street, T o rra n c e, C alifo rn ia 90503, USA.

PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III CONCEPT VALIDATION PROGRAM FULL SCALE DEVELOPMENT FULL OPERATIONAL AND SYSTEM TEST CAPABILITY F ig. 1. GPS program schedule.

GPS, the Global Positioning System, is being developed by the U.S. D epartm ent of Defense in order to enhance military effectiveness by providing precise, continuous, worldwide, all-weather, three-dim ensional navigation for land, sea, and air applications. As shown by Figure 1, we have entered Phase III of the three-phase effort to develop and deploy GPS. If all goes well, the system should be fully operational in 1989. (The Shuttle disaster will delay this date by a year or more). Although the system is being developed to serve m ilitary needs, civil users have been encouraged to consider system applications. Therefore, it is expected that, worldwide, there will be many times m ore civil than m ilitary users. Seven prototype satellites now are being employed to com plete the Phase II test program. Their orbits are designed to em ulate full system coverage for several hours each day, which permits testing without the expense o f having a full satellite constellation. As shown by Figure 2, we expect that four to seven of the prototype satellites will continue to be available for test purposes until the launch of production satellites begins late in 1986. Being larger and heavier than the prototype satellites, the production satellites will be launched from the Space Shuttle, and up to two may be launched on each flight. The curves of Figure 2 are an attem pt to predict the num ber of satellites available in future years, with the band ranging from pessimistic on the bottom to optimistic on the top. (Launches now cannot begin before mid-1987 and could well be later than the pessimistic curve). 0>------------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -------- 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1185 609«UNCLASSIFIED F ig. 2. G PS satellite a v ailab ility profile. The optimistic curve shows that by the end of 1987 there could be 12 operational satellites, providing continuous, two-dim ensional, worldwide navigation, which is sufficient for all marine applications. By the end o f 1988 there could be 18 operational satellites in the constellation illustrated by Figure 3, perm itting worldwide, continuous, three-dim ensional navigation. The altitude solution is needed for optim um aircraft and land vehicle applications. In addition, th e plan

I 185-5092 18 SHUTTLE-LAUNCHED NAVSTAR SATELLITES ~ 20,200 KM ABO VE THE EARTH F ig. 3. P lanned o perational G PS satellite constellation. is to place three active spare satellites in orbit, so that up to 21 satellites could be operational in the future. The pessim istic curve shows the same progression, but 12 m onths later. (An additional 12 to 24 month delay m ay be experienced). GPS satellites orbit about 20,200 kilometers above the earth. The orbit height is chosen so that it takes exactly h alf an earth rotation ( ~ 11 h58m02s) for a satellite to circle the earth. There will be a minimum of three satellites evenly spaced in each o f six orbit planes. With this constellation every user will be able to receive signals from four or m ore satellites sim ultaneously. By making tim e-of-am val m easurements on these signals, the user equipment will be able to determ ine four param eters: latitude, longitude, altitude, and time. The navigation signals provided by each GPS satellite are illustrated by Figure 4. GPS satellites transm it on two frequencies in order to perm it the m easurem ent and correction o f ionospheric refraction error. The two GPS frequencies are conveniently known as Li (1575.42 MHz) and Lj (1227.6 MHz). The Li signal carries two codes, whereas the L2 signal carries only one. The P code is a pseudorandom sequence of ones and zeros with a switching rate (how often a one can change to a zero or vice versa) of 10.23 MHz. The P codes run for 7 days

H = 1575.42 MHz C/A CODE AT 1.023 MHz P-C0DE AT 10.23 MHz l 2 = 1227.6 MHz P-CODE AT 10.23 MHz 284-1110 F ig. 4. GPS navigation signals. before repeating. The C /A codes switch at 1.023 MHz and repeat every m illisecond (i.e. the codes are 1023 bits long). Both the Li P and C /A codes carry the satellite m essage with a data rate of 50 bits per second. It is expected that the least expensive navigation equipm ent will operate on the Li frequency and use only the C /A codes. More expensive receivers equipped to use the P codes have three advantages. The first is access to the L2 frequency for ionospheric refraction correction. Second is m uch better protection from jam m ing signals, which is especially im portant for m ilitary applications. Third is better range m easurem ent precision, by a factor o f 2.2. Until GPS production satellites are launched it is im portant to note that we will have a few hours of full GPS coverage per day in most parts of the world. Figure 5 illustrates the num ber of satellites visible in Rotterdam and in Los Angeles throughout the day of 13 November 1985, assuming that all seven prototype satellites are operational. The figure also shows Horizontal Dilution o f Precision, H DOP, which is the statistical horizontal position error in meters resulting from each meter of rms ranging error to the satellites. H D O P values of 2 to 5 are considered acceptable, but values above 10 represent quite poor satellite geometry. As you can see, there is a limited time each day during which three or four satellites are visible and the H D O P approxim ates what we expect to see 24 hours a day when the system becom es fully operational. There are two key policy issues which concern potential GPS users. The first, called Anti-Spoofing (AS), is illustrated by Figure 6. The U.S. D epartm ent of Defense has announced that it intends to encrypt the P codes transm itted by the production satellites. The resultant code to be transm itted is called the Y code. This often-confirm ed policy would deny P code access (and therefore L2 access) to all but a few civilian users who can m aintain crypto security and for whom use o f the Y code is deem ed to be in the national security interest. This policy w ould seem to be an incentive for most civilian users at this time to concentrate their attention on single-frequency, C /A code equipm ent. Figure 7 illustrates the second m ajor policy issue called selective access (SA). C urve A shows the accuracy perform ance obtained during Phase I testing w ith a

NUMBER OF SATELLITES VISIBLE NUMBER OF SATELLITES VISIBLE 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ROTTERDAM NOVEMBER 13,1985 LAT N 51 55 LON E 04 27 ------HDOP (4 SATELLITES) ----- SATELLITES VISIBLE 1U 11 14 lb TIM E (GMT+1) TORRANCE NOVEMBER 13,1985 LAT N 33 50 LON W 118 20 ------HDOP (4 SATELLITES) ----- SATELLITES VISIBLE 10 8 6 4 2 HDOP HDOP 1185-5088 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 TIM E (GMT-8) F ig. 5. Satellite visibility profile w ith three-satellite FIDOP. 1185-5087 F ig. 6. T he satellites w ill tran sm it a restricted V code.

284-1108 HORIZONTAL ERROR IN METERS F ig. 7. Accuracy perform ance. A = m ulti-channel, Y code, controlled access; B = single channel, C /A code, controlled access; C = reduced accuracy, civil access. multi-channel, two-frequency, P code receiver like the Magnavox X-Set. Curve B shows the results obtained with a single-channel, slow-sequencing, one-frequency, C /A code Magnavox Z-Set. The curve B results were surprisingly good, so a decision was reached to limit the accuracy made available to civilian users until there is no longer a national security threat. Curve C shows the planned level of SA accuracy denial of 100 meters 2 drms (95 % of the time), although future improvements could occur because of the planned annual review process. At this time, however, civilian users needing greater accuracy should direct their attention to differential GPS techniques as described later in this paper. It is clear that low-cost GPS equipment already is being planned. The fact that the M X-1100 GPS Upgrade Kit described in the next section of this report consists of just two electronic modules, an oscillator, and an antenna unit illustrates that GPS receivers can be quite simple. The trend toward low-cost electronic navigation equipment has been underway for many years, as illustrated by Figure 8. This shows that the minimum price of a Magnavox Transit Satellite Navigator has been declining at a compound rate of about 22 % per year since 1976. Even taking into account the relative complexity of GPS versus Transit, this trend implies that $500 GPS equipment will be available before 1995. We expect GPS prices to be competitive from the moment the system becomes operational and to fall rapidly during the first several years thereafter. Those companies who wish to participate in this market surely will be required to invest millions in sophisticated research and development, manufacturing capacity and technologies, and worldwide marketing and service capabilities.

84 1106 YEAR F ig. 8. The price of Transit satellite navigation equipment has been falling faster than 22 percent per year. Finally, it is important to mention operational simplicity, which I believe is critical to civil acceptance. GPS is easier to use and to understand than Loran-C, Transit, Omega, or any other navigation system available today. There are no concerns with calibration, lane slips, skywave interference, or notching local interfering signals. The user can turn the set on and without further adjustment begin to navigate accurately and continuously. Of course there are limitations. Terrain, including tall buildings, can obscure the signals. But wherever GPS signals are available, its operation will be truly simple. Therefore, combining the characteristics of 24-hour, worldwide, all-weather navigation with adequate accuracy, with low cost, and with operational simplicity assures a vast potential market. Ultimately, it is reasonable to assume that there will be millions of users, so that electronic navigation by satellite will become a common experience.

INTERIM APPLICATIONS Although GPS is not yet operational, the coverage available today permits many practical applications. As a result, several com panies, including M agnavox, are selling commercial GPS navigation and positioning products. Figures 9, 10, 11 and 12 illustrate four products available from M agnavox. Figure 9 shows the T-Set which has been available since September 1984. It has been used by the U.S. Coast Guard for aircraft navigation, it is being used to evaluate land vehicle navigation, and it has been used for a wide variety of marine survey and navigation applications, including the successful search for the Titanic by the W oods Hole Oceanographic Institution, the navigation and positioning o f several offshore drill rigs, and recovery o f the Challenger wreckage o ff Cape Canaveral. In other words, many people are putting GPS to practical use in spite o f its limited coverage and in spite o f its developm ental status. F ig. 9. T-Set G P S N avigator. Since 1976 Magnavox has delivered nearly 6,000 o f the M X -1100 navigators shown in Figure 10. Different configurations have provided both Transit and com bined Transit plus Omega navigation for surface ships and for submarines. In September o f 1985 Magnavox began delivery o f GPS Upgrade Kits which add GPS to existing M X-1100 Transit Navigators. The kit consists o f the GPS antenna unit (or the com bined GPS and Transit antenna replacement shown in Figure 10, which avoids running an additional cable), two GPS modules which plug into available slots within the M X -1100 chassis, and another oscillator. The kit permits

F ig. 11. The WM-101 satellite surveying set.

GPS plus Transit plus dead reckoning navigation, and very soon it will be possible to include Omega navigation as well. Thus, a navigator is able to use GPS whenever it is available, but continue to operate with Transit an d /or Omega when GPS is not available. Each system provides a check on the other, thus reducing risk in the event o f a GPS ground control problem. The user experiences the benefits o f GPS at the earliest possible date, and the equipment configuration allows an automatic and graceful transition from interim to full GPS availability. Figure 11 shows the WM-101 satellite surveying equipment being developed in a joint venture with Wild Heerbrugg o f Switzerland. Deliveries began in March o f 1986, permitting surveyors to obtain 1 centimeter relative positioning results with this field-worthy and portable survey instrument. F ig. 12. MX-4400 G PS positioning and navigation system. Figure 12 shows the M X-4400 GPS Navigator which is being introduced in May o f 1986 and which will be delivered before the fourth quarter. It is a compact, low power, fully sealed product com patible with a wide range o f land, sea, and air applications. DIFFERENTIAL GPS Differential GPS is implemented by placing a GPS monitor receiver at a precisely known location. Instead o f computing a navigation fix, the monitor determines the range error to every GPS satellite it can track. These ranging errors are then transmitted to local users where they are applied as corrections before com puting the navigation result. With appropriate equipment, the user can expect a real-time accuracy of 2-3 meters (5 meters at 95 % confidence) at distances o f 200 kilometers or more from the monitor station. Therefore, differential techniques can be used to provide excellent accuracy in local areas whether or not the absolute navigation accuracy is being degraded as shown by Figure 7.

Differential GPS is of great interest to offshore oil industries. It provides needed accuracy over acceptable distances, and it protects the user from system errors introduced either accidentally during this test and evaluation phase of GPS or intentionally when the system becomes operational. Magnavox is preparing the equipment and the software needed to deploy operational differential GPS networks by m id-1986. Governments also are interested in differential GPS for similar reasons. The excellent accuracy can be used effectively in harbor, harbor entrance, and river navigation applications. With differential GPS the national or local government is able to assure navigational accuracy and reliability within its own territorial waters. It is interesting to note that the U.S. Coast Guard is planning a series of differential GPS experiments beginning in 1986. The concept being explored would add a differential GPS signal to existing marine radiobeacons operating in the 283.5 to 335 khz band. Thus, coastal and inland users able to receive these signals also would be able to obtain the benefits of differential GPS. Fortunately, it was recognized a few years ago that differential GPS signal standards would be needed in order to permit widespread use. In response, the RTCM (Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services) formed Special Committee 104 to study Differential Navstar/GPS service. Participation in Special Committee 104 was extensive. Users, manufacturers, and government representatives from the United States, Canada, France, and Great Britain were involved. The work continued for over two years, and the final report will be issued by mid-1986. The RTCM 104 report recommends transmission frequencies for various services, but more important it recommends a specific message format. The minimum data rate requirement is 50 bits per second. The hope is that this document will become a standard for all differential GPS services, permitting inter-operability with equipment from all manufacturers and signals from all shores. FUTURE TRENDS As shown by Figure 2, 12 GPS satellites should be operational at some point in 1988. (Now this will be 1989 or 1990). It is expected that 12 satellites, if properly spaced, could provide nearly continuous two-dimensional (latitude and longitude) navigation, thus satisfying most marine user requirements. Factors which will depress the expected enthusiasm for universal marine use at that time are : (1) the system probably will not be declared fully operational by the U.S. Government until 18 satellites can be fully assured, (2) the 12-satellite constellation probably will continue to have some coverage gaps, depending on location and time of day, and (3) many less progressive users will take a wait and see attitude. Nevertheless, 1988 (now 1989 or 1990) is the year when massive use of GPS is expected to begin. Although there will be many variations, it is expected that there will be four general categories of GPS marine navigation equipment. First is the very low-cost, battery powered, hand-held set which will be used not only by hikers and explorers but also by small boat operators. The second category is a low-cost product designed for perm anent installation aboard pleasure boats, but it will also be used

for many light commercial applications. This equipment must be designed for continuous exposure to the marine environment and connection to existing power sources. The third category will be designed for heavy commercial applications requiring many years of continuous, failure-free operation. Also, the user must be able to find trained personnel and spare parts in many ports worldwide. Finally, the fourth category is the GPS sensor which forms part of an integrated navigation or positioning system. Each manufacturer will seek to provide special features in order to increase market share. There will be interfaces to an external compass, the autopilot, and to advanced radars for map matching. Because every GPS set contains a powerful computer, computational features will abound, probably to the point of confusion. Every indication is that a very large number of companies around the world are planning to enter the GPS user equipment market. Eventually the user will benefit from the lower prices and improved performance caused by the intense international competition. In the short run, however, we expect to see many companies enter the market only to drop out when competitive pressure becomes too intense and profit margins shrink or disappear. This certainly has been the case when one reviews the history of TRANSIT satellite navigation products, and the number of entries into and departures from the market place will be many times greater with GPS. As with all new technologies some users will rush to employ GPS as soon as possible, and others, more conservative, will hold back. In the long term, however, the clear advantages of accuracy, reliability, coverage, and simplicity will cause even the most conservative to embrace the new system. Not even severe political differences with the United States are likely to dampen user enthusiasm for GPS, because, regardless of its source, these signals will be seen to serve the purpose of navigation and positioning better than any presently available system. Government regulations will affect the use of GPS. It is certain that, when GPS becomes operational, the U.S. Coast Guard will accept it for navigation within U.S. waters, just as Loran-C and TRANSIT have been accepted. Eventually, international regulations may require the use of GPS or its equivalent. The Soviet Union has announced that it is implementing a global positioning system called GLONASS. If the two superpowers vie with each other in providing the best navigation services, the user community presumably will benefit from increased accuracy and signal availability. In fact, instead of having to decide which system to use, equipment may be built to use the signals from both systems simultaneously. CONCLUSION GPS will be fully implemented, and it will be used extensively. Some of the remaining questions are : (1) When will it become operational? (2) Will accuracy actually be degraded to 100 meters 2drms? Part time or full time?

(3) Will accuracy be improved in the future? When? (4) Will differential GPS be needed, and will it be used extensively? (5) How many companies will offer a product? What features? What price? It will be interesting, even exciting, to see how these questions are answered over the next few years. Whatever the outcome, it is clear that anyone needing navigation should remain aware of the system status and be prepared to take maximum advantage of what is sure to become the universal radionavigation system.