How Industry Assesses Areas for R&D Investment

Similar documents
If you can t do it better, why do it? -- Herbert H. Dow

Universities as Drivers of Growth in the U.S. A Brief Introduction

Technology Transfer: Working with Industry at MIT. 10 February 2009 Kenneth A. Goldman Manager, Corporate Relations MIT Industrial Liaison Program

Addressing the Innovation Imperative

A View from the Academic Sector

Arshad Mansoor, Sr. Vice President, Research & Development INNOVATION SCOUTS: EXPANDING EPRI S TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION NETWORK

Beyond the Disruptive Innovation Trap

Organizing Homeland Security Science and Technology

The SEMATECH Model: Potential Applications to PV

Interagency Collaboration: Barriers / Solutions

New Approaches to Manufacturing Innovation in DOE

Service Science: A Key Driver of 21st Century Prosperity

An Introduction to China s Science and Technology Policy

Evolution of U.S. Innovation Policy

The Challenge of the Valley of Death

Data Sciences Entrepreneurship class

Patenting Strategies. The First Steps. Patenting Strategies / Bernhard Nussbaumer, 12/17/2009 1

CRS Report for Congress

WPI Intellectual Property A day in the life of the tech transfer office. Todd Keiller Director, Intellectual Property and Innovation

Innovation. Key to Strengthening U.S. Competitiveness. Dr. G. Wayne Clough President, Georgia Institute of Technology

Interplay of Intellectual Property Rights and Academic - Industry Collaboration to Foster Digital Inclusion

CEE Analytics Midstream. Initiation, Realizations RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

Promoting Foreign Direct Investment in The United States. Christopher Clement International Investment Specialist Invest in America

Science and Technology Policy

Prof. Steven S. Saliterman. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota

Technology Commercialization Primer: Understanding the Basics. Leza Besemann

TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Global Printing Summit Forum

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY

Government s Role in Promoting the Use of ICT

Emerging Transportation Technology Strategic Plan for the St. Louis Region Project Summary June 28, 2017

BASED ECONOMIES. Nicholas S. Vonortas

MIT Capital Renewal. Kevin Connolly Brian Healy Ken Packard Greg Raposa MIT DEPARTMENT OF FACILITIES

Guidelines to Promote National Integrated Circuit Industry Development : Unofficial Translation

Overview. How is technology transferred? What is technology transfer? What is Missouri S&T technology transfer?

Workshop on Enabling Technologies in CSF for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Early Stage Research and Technology at U.S. Federal Government Agencies

Are large firms withdrawing from investing in science?

The Evolution of Science and Technology: The Need for a New Policy Model. Jerald Hage, Director Center for Innovation,

Helping Businesses & Investors. Succeed Across Saudi Arabia

Investing in Regional Sustainability Norris Lozano, PDC

DoD Technology Transfer Program

THE INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS OF ECONOMIES IN TRANSITION THE UNTAPPED POTENTIAL: A CHALLENGE FOR BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT BELARUS

Annual Report 2010 COS T SME. over v i e w

Promoting Innovation in Healthcare through the Patent System: The Bayh-Dole Act and the Orphan Drug Act

CCR Phase II Study Measure for Measure: Chemical R&D Powers the U.S. Innovation Engine. Donald B. Anthony, Sc.D. President & Executive Director

Science Policy and Social Change. December 2003

Choosing the Right Partner for Global Expansion. Oded Shenkar & Lou Longo

University IP and Technology Management. University IP and Technology Management

Unleashing the Discovery and Innovation Ecosystem

International Cooperation in Horizon 2020

02 SQUARE ENIX To Our Shareholders. A Fundamental Industry Change from Evolution in Network Technology. Yoichi Wada

Connecting to Grow the Space Economy

executives are often viewed to better understand the merits of scientific over commercial solutions.

Evolution of U.S. Government Innovation Organization: From the Pipeline Model, to the Connected Model, to the Problem of Political Design

The Center for Emerging and Innovative Sciences University of Rochester September 5, 2013

Rising to the Innovation Challenge

Automotive Sector What is our interest in CAV & ITS and Why? Nigel J Francis

Realignment of Roles of Engineering and Science in a Changing Research Environment

WIPO ASIAN REGIONAL SEMINAR ON AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STRATEGY FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES (SMEs)

Technological Innovation In the 21st Century

University Tech Transfer

Course 1.1 Introduction to Innovation: Role of STI for Growth and Sustainable Development UN-Wide Capacity Building Workshop on Technology for

Science and Innovation Policies at the Digital Age. Dominique Guellec Science and Technology Policy OECD

Getting Started. This Lecture

Korean STI Policy: Evolution and Direction

AAAS Project on Science and Intellectual Property in the Public Interest

Domestic Reform and Global Integration: The Evolution of China s Innovation System and Innovation Policies

UHS Intellectual Property Policies and Procedures

Converting Research into Innovation & Growth: SBIR, the University, and the Park

Materials Science and Corporate Research

NASA s Down- To-Earth Principles Deliver Positive Strategic Outcomes

Kazakhstan Way of Innovation Clusterization K. Mukhtarova Al-Farabi Kazak National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

Commercialization Strategies that Work

Patent. Fish &Richardson

Climate Change Innovation and Technology Framework 2017

The Contribution of the Social Sciences to the Energy Challenge

Scott D. Rechtschaffen. Focus Areas. Overview

Voters Attitudes toward Science and Technology Research and the Role of the Federal Government

Administrative Policy at OSTP

The Evolution of Economies

Mergers and Acquisitions/ Private Equity. Providing In-Depth Deal Coverage for Buyers, Sellers, and Investors. Attorney Advertising

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE INNOVATION ENVIRONMENT

Science, Research and Information Technology

INDUSTRIAL RESARCH AND CONSULTANCY CENTRE

Shandong Government Suggestions on Implementing New Document 4 to Speed up IC Industry Development

Early-stage Capital in the United States:

Engineering Education: The Impact

Danish Technological Institute Soeren Stjernqvist, CEO. Introduction It s all about innovation Governance The weather forecast

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT Dr. Mohsen Mohammadi PO Box 4400, 15 Dineen Drive Fredericton, New Brunswick Canada E3B 5A3 506)

International Conference on Education, Management and Computer Science (ICEMC 2016)

The Sherwin-Williams Company

THIS IS RESEARCH. THIS IS AUBURN RESEARCH.

Overview: National AI R&D Strategic Plan

Other Transaction Agreements. Chemical Biological Defense Acquisition Initiatives Forum

How to Establish and Manage a Technology Transfer Office

Discovery: From Concept to the Patient - The Business of Medical Discovery. Todd Sherer, Ph.D.

IP and Technology Management for Universities

Role of Knowledge Economics as a Driving Force in Global World

University industry research relations and intellectual property: Some insights from the United States

Transcription:

How Industry Assesses Areas for R&D Investment Susan B. Butts, PhD Sr. Director, External Science & Technology Programs The Dow Chemical Company AAAS Forum on Science & Technology Policy

Topics Relative R&D Investments Evolution of R&D in the US Leveraging the Federal Investment Why Companies Do R&D The Need for Competitive Advantage Balancing Risk and Reward Industry Variants Where Companies Do R&D SBButts 2

US R&D Funding: Government vs. Industry SBButts 3

How Much Is Spent on R&D? Figures for 2006: Funding / Performing World ~$1T (estimated from 2002 data) US-Located Companies (primarily from product sales) $192B / $209B US Federal Government (tax dollars) $81B / $32B US Universities (primarily from Federal Government) $8B / $40B SBButts 4

Government University Time/ Event Evolution of R&D in the US Derived From: C.T. Hill, "Partnerships in Research: The Evolution of Expectations," in Research Teams and Partnerships: Trends in the Chemical Sciences, Board on Chemical Sciences, National Research Council, 1999, pp 21-27. Disseminate knowledge University Industry Relationship Gov t funds corrupt Create knowledge Disseminate knowledge Provides funds for defense research Weapons labs Supply Workers Pre-1900 WWII 1945 1950 1957 Sputnik Individual inventors Industry Defense industry R&D departments created Vannevar Bush Science: The Endless Frontier NIH AEC ONR NSF Linear Model NASA DARPA Intensive funding from gov t for basic research Independence Gov t funding shrinks Corporate Self-Sufficiency 1973 Arab Oil Embargo Cooperation 1980 Bayh-Dole Act NIST ATP Engine for economic development Create knowledge Disseminate knowledge Vertical Collaboration Competition? Strategic Alliances Restructuring Globalization Central research labs created for fundamental R&D downsized & research decentralized SEMATECH SBButts (horizontal collaboration) 5

Growth from Chemical Sciences R&D CCR $1 B/yr Federal R&D Funding In Chemical Sciences $5 B/yr Chemical Industry R&D Funding Basis: *estimated from CCR study **extrapolated from LANL study by Thayer, et al., April 2005 using REMI economic model $8 B/yr Growth in Taxes** $10 B/yr Growth in Chemical Industry Operating Income* 0.6 M New Jobs/yr** $40 B/yr GDP** Growth The Council for Chemical Research 6

Overarching Mission For Industry What: Maximize Long-Term Shareholder Return How: Invest to create most value through making/selling products or services Balance short-term viability against long-term value Avoid destroying value SBButts 7

Balancing Risk & Reward Minimize Risk Technical risk Financial risk Commercial risk Legal risk/liability Maximize Reward Competitive advantage Sales & profits Market position Product performance SBButts 8

Why and How Companies Do R&D Do R&D to create a competitive advantage in the market Try to place smart bets - invest R&D and capital dollars (manufacturing assets) on those technologies that have The best chance of success in the market The greatest return - sales volume/profit margin The winners have to cover the cost of the losers SBButts 9

R&D Investment Choices Trade offs in R&D investment decisions balancing upfront costs against potential returns Create new value (long term, high risk, high return) Discover and develop new products Preserve existing value (short term, low risk, moderate return) Extend or expand current products Avoid destroying value (long term, variable risk, negative return; also cost of not doing R&D) Loss of competition advantage Replacement or disruptive technology SBButts 10

Why Good Science May Not Successfully Commercialize Technology is not reproducible Technology does not scale up from lab to plant Cost or quality problems in manufacturing Insufficient market demand Consumers don t want/need the product Poor timing Poor path to market SBButts 11

Why a Good Product May Fail Even if There is Market Demand Probability of Commercial Success Depends on Characteristics of New Product Lower Cost Marginal High Higher Cost Low Marginal Poorer Performance Better Performance SBButts 12

Industry Variants Impact R&D Decisions Large company vs. small company Multiple products vs. single product R&D intensive vs. technology insensitive Differing business models for competitive advantage in the market (e.g., Pharmaceutical industry vs. Information Technology industry) Nature of products Time to commercialization Product lifetime Use of intellectual property Profit margins SBButts 13

Promoting Industry R&D Investments Federal funding for high risk breakthrough research and demonstrations in areas of national interest Consortia for development of pre- competitive technology R&D tax credits SBButts 14

Where in the World to Invest in R&D Deciding where to locate R&D is quite complex and influenced by many factors, most importantly: Access to product markets Quality of R&D personnel University collaboration Intellectual property protection Thursby & Thursby, Here or There? A Survey of Factors Multinational R&D Location, National Academies Press, 2006 SBButts 15