Aquarius Project, Spacecraft, Instrument and Data Processing Status

Similar documents
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology

Autonomous and Autonomic Systems: With Applications to NASA Intelligent Spacecraft Operations and Exploration Systems

VBS - The Optical Rendezvous and Docking Sensor for PRISMA

QB50. Satellite Control Software (QB50 SCS) Muriel Richard Swiss Space Center. 6 th QB50 Workshop 6 June 2013 Rhode-Saint-Genèse, Belgium

Deep Space Communication The further you go, the harder it gets. D. Kanipe, Sept. 2013

Sentinel-2 Products and Algorithms

Proba-V QWG#7 Flight & GS status. 3 4 May 2018 ACRI, Sophia-Antipolis

Status of MODIS, VIIRS, and OLI Sensors

MODEL AND SIMULATION BASED SATELLITE ENGINEERING

Dave McGinnis Rich Kelley Jean Pla NESDIS spectrum manager Alion Science CNES Silver Spring, MD Suitland, MD Toulouse, FR

The M-Cubed/COVE Mission

MICROSCOPE Mission operational concept

Soil moisture retrieval using ALOS PALSAR

Software-Intensive Systems Producibility

Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Mission Simulators - Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

Model Based AOCS Design and Automatic Flight Code Generation: Experience and Future Development

I Need Your Cost Estimate for a 10 Year Project by Next Week

JWST Functional Flow Diagrams and Schematic Block Diagrams

CubeSat Integration into the Space Situational Awareness Architecture

Integral R. Southworth ESA/ESOC Integral Users Group Meeting, ESTEC, 19/1/2012 Mission Extension Operations Review, 2012

Use of the Deep Impact HRI Instrument to Observe Exoplanets Via Microlensing

Proximity Operations Nano-Satellite Flight Demonstration (PONSFD) Overview

NASA s X2000 Program - an Institutional Approach to Enabling Smaller Spacecraft

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Helioseismic Magnetic Imager Program at LMSAL

DISC Experiment Overview & On-Orbit Performance Results

The PTR Group Capabilities 2014

SURREY GSA CATALOG. Surrey Satellite Technology US LLC 8310 South Valley Highway, 3rd Floor, Englewood, CO

Ground Systems Department

End-to-End Simulation and Verification of Rendezvous and Docking/Berthing Systems using Robotics

IDEAS - RA2/MWR/DORIS instruments events during ENVISAT mission

APL s Reusable Flight Software Architecture and the Infusion of New Technology

2009 CubeSat Developer s Workshop San Luis Obispo, CA

Small Satellites: The Execution and Launch of a GPS Radio Occultation Instrument in a 6U Nanosatellite

Figure 1. Proposed Mission Operations Functions. Key Performance Parameters Success criteria of an amateur communicator on board of Moon-exploration

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

SwissCube Project. 3rd Annual Cubesat Workshop April 27, Prof. Herbert Shea EPFL Microsystems for Space Technologies Laboratory

The TEXAS Satellite Design Laboratory: An Overview of Our Current Projects FASTRAC, BEVO-2, & ARMADILLO

Dynamics and Operations of an Orbiting Satellite Simulation. Requirements Specification 13 May 2009

The Nemo Bus: A Third Generation Nanosatellite Bus for Earth Monitoring and Observation

Workshop on Intelligent System and Applications (ISA 17)

Ground Station Design for STSAT-3

Office of Chief Technologist - Space Technology Program Dr. Prasun Desai Office of the Chief Technologist May 1, 2012

CubeSat Developers Workshop 2014

16 Oct 2014, Estavayer-le-Lac, Switzerland. TW-1: A Cubesat constellation for space networking experiments

Update on Landsat Program and Landsat Data Continuity Mission

Unmanned on-orbit servicing (OOS), ROKVISS and the TECSAS mission

Kennedy Space Center. Connecting Space Grant with Spaceport and Range Technology and Science Thrust Areas

Management Operations Control Applications (MOCA) Mission Update

The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)

Phoenix. A 3U CubeSat to Study Urban Heat Islands. Sarah Rogers - Project Manager NASA Space Grant Symposium April 14, 2018

NASA Search and Rescue Cospas-Sarsat MEOSAR, Second Generation Beacons, and DF Receiver with UAS March 23, 2017

Computing IPT. B.E. Glendenning (NRAO) J. Ibsen (JAO) G. Kosugi (NAOJ) G. Raffi (ESO) Computing IPT ALMA Annual External Review October

Available Ocean Color Satellite Imagery

Solar Observing Low-frequency Array for Radio Astronomy (SOLARA)

A Lightweight Open Source Command and Control Center and its Interface to Cubesat Flight Software

"TELSIM: REAL-TIME DYNAMIC TELEMETRY SIMULATION ARCHITECTURE USING COTS COMMAND AND CONTROL MIDDLEWARE"

From Single to Formation Flying CubeSats: An Update of the Delfi Programme

Airborne Observation Platform (AOP)

Standardised Ground Data Systems Implementation: A Dream?

Jager UAVs to Locate GPS Interference

Platform Independent Launch Vehicle Avionics

GLAST Large Area Telescope:

NASA ELaNa IV Launch

The Use of SPARK in a Complex Spacecraft CubeSat Developer s Workshop - Copyright 2017 Carl Brandon & Peter Chapin

Thomas Meissner, Frank Wentz, Kyle Hilburn Remote Sensing Systems

PLATO Preliminary Requirements Review Technical Report

ARMADILLO: Subsystem Booklet

System Architecture Module Exploration Systems Engineering, version 1.0

Remote Director. Sony 23 SDM-P232W. Collaborative Soft Proofing using the I. MANUFACTURER INTRODUCTION. SWOP Application Data Sheet

Automation challenges of the Mission Planning System and the Ground Station Network within the TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X Ground Segment

Pre-Launch Radiometric Calibration of the S-NPP and JPSS-1 VIIRS Day/Night Bands

Miguel A. Aguirre. Introduction to Space. Systems. Design and Synthesis. ) Springer

OSTM/Jason-2 and AltiKa new tracking modes. J. Lambin, J.-D. Desjonquères, N. Steunou, CNES J. Helbert, NOVELTIS

DYNAMIC IONOSPHERE CUBESAT EXPERIMENT

Development of the Satellite Ground Control System for Multi-mission Geostationary Satellite COMS

Pathfinder Technology Demonstrator GlobalStar Testing and Results

The Role of the Communities of Interest (COIs) March 25, Dr. John Stubstad Director, Space & Sensor Systems, OASD (Research & Engineering)

Satellite Fleet Operations Using a Global Ground Station Network. Naomi Kurahara Infostellar

Phone Number: Postage Address: 300 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 2000, El Segundo, Ca.

CubeSats: From Launch to Deployment Necessity for a standard.

Earth Observations from Space U.S. Geological Survey

29 th Annual Louisiana RS/GIS Workshop April 23, 2013 Cajundome Convention Center Lafayette, Louisiana

MERLIN Mission Status

Space Systems Engineering

Airbus DS ESA Phase-0 L5 Spacecraft/Orbital Concept Overview. Emanuele Monchieri 6 th March 2017

Global Erratum for Kepler Q0-Q17 & K2 C0-C5 Short-Cadence Data

THEME MARINE LIFE MONITORING AND PRESENTATION.

Lessons Learned from the US Air Force SENSE CubeSat Mission

2009 Small Satellite Conference Logan, Utah

RAX: The Radio Aurora explorer

ABSTRACT. Keywords: ESSP, Earth Venture, program management, NASA Science Mission Directorate, Class-D mission, Instrument-first 1.

Systems Engineering Process

Instrumentation, Controls, and Automation - Program 68

Dynamic Data-Driven Adaptive Sampling and Monitoring of Big Spatial-Temporal Data Streams for Real-Time Solar Flare Detection

Preparations for NOAA-N

MEMS in Space A New Technology Advancing from Flight Experiment to Proven COTS Product

International Armaments Technology Symposium & Exhibition NDIA

Mid Term Exam SES 405 Exploration Systems Engineering 3 March Your Name

GEM - Generic Engineering Model Overview

Transcription:

Aquarius Project, Spacecraft, Instrument and Data Processing Status Gene Carl Feldman, Joel Gales, Liang Hong, Norman Kuring, Tommy Owens, Fred Patt, Alicia Scott, John Wilding Cal-Val Virtual Workshop WebMeeting 29-30 January /2013

Outline Instrument Status Spacecraft Status Star Tracker issue and status Ground System and Data Processing Status 29-30 January 2

Aquarius Instrument Summary provided by Simon Collins at CONAE PLAR Nov. 2012 1- Aquarius mission-mode operation exhibits excellent performance, meeting all L3 instrument requirements. 2- Observatory anomalies have not affected Aquarius instrument performance. 3- The Aquarius instrument team is supporting routine monitoring of the instrument performance and is involved in instrument calibration. 29-30 January 3

Aquarius Instrument Summary provided by Simon Collins at CONAE PLAR Nov. 2012 29-30 January 4

Spacecraft Status Outline Autonomous Star Tracker (ASTR) 1 and 2 29-30 January 5

OBSERVABLES FOR THE ASTR AND AOCS BEHAVIOR (CONTINUED) 29-30 January 6

OBSERVABLES FOR THE ASTR AND AOCS BEHAVIOR (CONTINUED) 29-30 January 7

OBSERVABLES FOR ASTR1 (CONTINUED) 29-30 January 8

DISTRIBUTION OF QUALITY INDEX FOR ASTR1 AND ASTR2 29-30 January 9

LIMITATIONS AND CONSTRAINTS Sub-sampled HKT data: By default, the AOCS data is decimated to one sample every 8 seconds. It is possible to decimate some variables to one sample per second. Full ASTR telemetry not available: Only SENSOR STATUS and TELEMETRY STATUS data blocks are included in the AOCS HKT. Adding additional datawords would require an AOCS software patch. ASTR CCD map download not available: This would also require an AOCS software patch. Telemetry allocation for one ASTR: Telemetry can be obtained for only one ASTR at a time. AOCS Source Code: INVAP currently has the only copy of the source code and is the only organization that can develop flight software patches. Flight Software Testing: The SAC-D EM does not include EMs of the ASTRs to support patch validation. 29-30 January 10

OPERATIONAL MITIGATION STRATEGIES Mitigation Plan Rev. A: Disable automatic re-promotion of ASTR AAD mode by FDIR for 20 minutes starting just before Moon intrusion (recommended by NASA SME M. Vess). Implemented starting 9 August 2012. Mitigation Plan Rev B: Command ASTR to STB mode for 20 minutes starting just before Moon intrusion. Implemented starting 7 October 2012. Mitigation Plan Rev C: Disable use of ASTR1 by AOCS for 49 minutes starting just before Moon intrusion. Implemented starting 19 November 2012. Mitigation Plan D: INVAP delivered an analysis of the ASTR-driven AOCS SHO transitions and a proposed solution.this proposal is currently under discussion between CONAE, INVAP and NASA and may be implemented next week. 29-30 January 11

Aquarius Project Status Path Forward on ASTR situation As a result of consultations with the Project Office and the recommendations of the Standing Review Board at the SAC-D PLAR, CONAE has requested that NASA convene a group of experts from all organizations involved in the Project to achieve the following objectives: 1- A near-term operational strategy for CONAE to implement in order to mitigate the impact of the performance issues, specifically to minimize the degradation of the Aquarius and SAC-D instrument science data. 2- An understanding of the apparent change in the performance of ASTR1 since the start of the mission. 3- An understanding of the as-launched AOCS software, specifically in the implementation and quality control of the ASTR data; 4- An understanding of the performance of ASTR2 during the period when it was powered on, which was observed to be significantly worse than ASTR1. 5- A long-term resolution, e.g., AOCS parameter changes or software patches, to address the ASTR and/or AOCS issues. The focus of the Team will be on objectives 2 through 5. 29-30 January 12

Status Summary The Aquarius Ground Segment -- both systems and personnel -- are working well, and there are no significant issues. The end-to-end process of Aquarius data collection -- planning, scheduling, downlink, acquisition -- has worked as designed since launch. Not a single minute of Aquarius data has been lost since power-on due to either spacecra', instrument or ground system anomalies demonstrating robustness of the downlink strategy. At this time, no spacecra'-related maneuver or issue has made Aquarius exceed its data loss requirement (8% per month) The operations interfaces with CONAE have matured significantly since Aquarius PLAR. All planning product deliveries, verifications and CUSS/CODS products are now routine with only occasional issues - all of which have been quickly and effectively resolved. 29-30 January 13

Status Summary The Aquarius and SAC-D Status and Housekeeping Telemetry web-based analysis pages are widely used by all teams and have provided comprehensive, critical and timely information to help identify many issues that have arisen since launch. As our understanding of the instrument and spacecra' has improved, the capabilities of these tools have been expanded. GS team holds quarterly telemetry workshops with the instrument team. CONAE FOT and ACCS are joint participants in the weekly issue/anomaly review process. Other teams (e.g., Aquarius instrument, SDI) invited to participate. FOT and ACCS function as a unified team in this area. All documents are under CM. Aquarius GS documents are signed off. Joint CONAE/Aquarius operations documents are complete. Multiple algorithm updates (V1.2 to 2.0) have been implemented and algorithm update verification process has been refined since launch. Complete mission reprocessing takes less than 1 day and products are immediately available to the science team and PO.DAAC. 29-30 January 14

Aquarius Websites 29-30 January 15

Outline 29-30 January 16

Outline 29-30 January 17

29-30 January 18

29-30 January 19

Outline 29-30 January 20

Outline 29-30 January 21

Outline 29-30 January 22

Outline 29-30 January 23

Outline 29-30 January 24

Outline 29-30 January 25

Aquarius Level-1-2 Data Browser http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi/aquarius 29-30 January 26

Aquarius Level-1-2 Data Browser http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi/aquarius 29-30 January 27

Aquarius Level-1-2 Data Browser http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi/aquarius 29-30 January 28

Outline 29-30 January 29

Aquarius Seasonal Sea Surface Salinity (V1.3.9) Summer 2011 Autumn 2011 Winter 2011/2012 Spring 2012 Summer 2012 Autumn 2012 29-30 January 30

Aquarius One Year Sea Surface Salinity 29-30 January 31