General Briefing v.1.1 February 2016 GLOBAL INTERNET POLICY OBSERVATORY

Similar documents
Section 1: Internet Governance Principles

)XWXUH FKDOOHQJHV IRU WKH WRXULVP VHFWRU

Fourth Annual Multi-Stakeholder Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology CONCEPT NOTE

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

Second Annual Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals

OECD WORK ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Extract of Advance copy of the Report of the International Conference on Chemicals Management on the work of its second session

ERAC-SFIC 1353/15 AFG/nj 1 DG G 3 C

ANNEXES. to the. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

"How to ensure a secure supply of raw materials in the global economy"

RECOMMENDATIONS. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (EU) 2018/790 of 25 April 2018 on access to and preservation of scientific information

APEC Internet and Digital Economy Roadmap

Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) Common Implementation Strategy (CIS)

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Conclusions concerning various issues related to the development of the European Research Area

8365/18 CF/nj 1 DG G 3 C

Data users and data producers interaction: the Web-COSI project experience

10246/10 EV/ek 1 DG C II

IIED s Artisanal and Small-scale Mining (ASM) Knowledge Programme

Enabling ICT for. development

Report OIE Animal Welfare Global Forum Supporting implementation of OIE Standards Paris, France, March 2018

Current status and new developments in IG capacity building DiploFoundation s capacity building approach in Internet governance

UKRI research and innovation infrastructure roadmap: frequently asked questions

LIVING LAB OF GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

WFEO STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENGINEERING FOR INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY (WFEO-CEIT) STRATEGIC PLAN ( )

Summary Remarks By David A. Olive. WITSA Public Policy Chairman. November 3, 2009

II. The mandates, activities and outputs of the Technology Executive Committee

IEEE Internet Initiative

European Circular Economy Stakeholder Conference Brussels, February 2018 Civil Society Perspectives

Smart Management for Smart Cities. How to induce strategy building and implementation

Item 4.2 of the Draft Provisional Agenda COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

The Initiative of the Government of Portugal and the TaC-Together against Cybercrime International

IESI Research Design, Results Achieved, Workshop's Objectives & Work in Progress

Multi-level third space for systemic urban research and innovation

I. Introduction. Cover note. A. Mandate. B. Scope of the note. Technology Executive Committee. Fifteenth meeting. Bonn, Germany, September 2017

Our position. ICDPPC declaration on ethics and data protection in artificial intelligence

BSSSC Annual Conference Resolution 2016

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of on access to and preservation of scientific information. {SWD(2012) 221 final} {SWD(2012) 222 final}

Highlights. Make. the. right. connection CONNECT GLOBALLY.

Societal engagement in Horizon 2020

BOTSWANA INTERNET GOVERNANCE FORUM (IGF) DISCUSSION PAPER

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. on the evaluation of Europeana and the way forward. {SWD(2018) 398 final}

CO-ORDINATION MECHANISMS FOR DIGITISATION POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES:

COST FP9 Position Paper

Stakeholders Acting Together On the ethical impact assessment of Research and Innovation

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Dissemination and Exploitation under H2020

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Strategic Policy Forum: A Roadmap for Digital Entrepreneurship

Information points report

An ecosystem to accelerate the uptake of innovation in materials technology

Draft executive summaries to target groups on industrial energy efficiency and material substitution in carbonintensive

ITU Telecom World 2018 SMART ABC

IGF Policy Options for Connecting the Next Billion - A Synthesis -

At its meeting on 18 May 2016, the Permanent Representatives Committee noted the unanimous agreement on the above conclusions.

Foresight Impact on Policy making and Lessons for New Member States and Candidate Countries Insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process

Research Infrastructures and Innovation

A New Platform for escience and data research into the European Ecosystem.

Committee on Culture and Education. Rapporteur for the opinion (*): Marisa Matias, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy

Roadmap for European Universities in Energy December 2016

Burgundy : Towards a RIS3

Science with and for Society Project Partner Search Form

the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission of South Africa (CIPC)

UN-GGIM Future Trends in Geospatial Information Management 1

ESCWA Perspective On Capacity Building for Measuring the Information Society

ARTEMIS Industry Association

WSIS+10 REVIEW: NON-PAPER 1

PROGRAM CONCEPT NOTE Theme: Identity Ecosystems for Service Delivery

The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)

EOSC Governance Development Forum 6 April 2017 Per Öster

IP KEY SOUTH EAST ASIA ANNUAL WORK PLAN FOR 2018

Report on the linkage modalities and the rolling workplan of the Technology Executive Committee for

Statement by Ms. Shamika N. Sirimanne Director Division on Technology and Logistics and Head CSTD Secretariat

ACTIVITY REPORT OF THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVENESS COMMISSION PRAMONĖ 4.0 OF 2017

CAPACITIES. 7FRDP Specific Programme ECTRI INPUT. 14 June REPORT ECTRI number

Research and Academic Partner Constituent Group RAPCG of the General Assembly of Partners Statement at Panel 6 Follow-Up and Review,

Engaging UK Climate Service Providers a series of workshops in November 2014

Horizon 2020 and CAP towards 2020

April 2015 newsletter. Efficient Energy Planning #3

Mainstreaming PE in Horizon 2020: perspectives and ambitions

Comments from CEN CENELEC on COM(2010) 245 of 19 May 2010 on "A Digital Agenda for Europe"

Conclusions on the future of information and communication technologies research, innovation and infrastructures

Outline. IPTS and the Information Society Unit IPTS Research Agenda on ICT for Governance

Policy Partnership on Science, Technology and Innovation Strategic Plan ( ) (Endorsed)

MINERVA: IMPROVING THE PRODUCTION OF DIGITAL CULTURAL HERITAGE IN EUROPE. Rossella Caffo - Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali, Italia

Spurring Big Data-Driven Innovation and Promoting Responsible Data Governance in a Privacy-Centred Europe

Zeinab El-Sadr Ministry of Scientific Research, Egypt CAASTNet Stakeholders Meeting, Dakar Senegal 25 th April 2012

Development UNESCO s Perspective

ccess to Cultural Heritage Networks Across Europe

RIS3-MCAT Platform: Monitoring smart specialization through open data

Open access to research data in a European policy context

BUILDING CAPACITIES: ENTREPRENEURIAL LEARNING AND SME SKILLS

OECD-INADEM Workshop on

Scientific information in the digital age: European Commission initiatives

Promoting citizen-based services through local cultural partnerships

Indigenous and Public Engagement Working Group Revised Recommendations Submitted to the SMR Roadmap Steering Committee August 17, 2018

MERIL MAPPING OF THE EUROPEAN RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE LANDSCAPE

Transcription:

General Briefing v.1.1 February 2016 GLOBAL INTERNET POLICY OBSERVATORY

1. Introduction In 2014 1 the European Commission proposed the creation of a Global Internet Policy Observatory (GIPO) as a concrete way to enhance transparency on Internet Policy and Governance. Member States welcomed this initiative and encouraged the Commission to work on it 2. GIPO is an online tool that helps monitor developments on Internet policy around the world. Its purpose is to help increase expertise and understanding among all actors, particularly more disadvantaged stakeholders - including those in some countries, NGOs and interest groups which may feel somewhat marginalised in Internet Governance debates and decisions. Internet policy and governance is attracting increasing interest and political attention but it is an extremely complex policy area. This is due to the expanding number of players involved and of issues discussed, ranging from security and trust to innovative and disruptive business models; from net neutrality, access and digital literacy to the Internet of things; from the shared and accountable management of critical Internet technical resources to blockchain technology; and the list continues to grow. Thanks to the use of advanced IT technologies (data mining, semantic analysis and data visualisation techniques), GIPO will provide a practical tool (a sort of "compass") to navigate through the maze of Internet governance and policy. GIPO is currently being developed under a contract from the European Commission. However, the Commission does not wish to be the final or sole "owner or operator" of GIPO. Discussions are ongoing with a number of partners on a possible transfer of GIPO to an organisation or a group of organisations, reflecting the global character of the tool. The project was initiated in January 2015. A beta version of the GIPO tool was publicly launched in February 2016. The GIPO tool should be fully operational at the end of 2016. Different stakeholders are involved in all stages of the development of the tool through periodic webinars and live events, to make sure that its design carefully reflects the needs of its future users. The "GIPO website" www.giponet.org provides information on the advancement of the GIPO project, while the "GIPO tool" is the web-based software tool (http://observatory.giponet.org/ still under development) that can be embedded into any website. 1 Communication on Internet Policy and Governance: Europe's role in shaping the future of Internet Governance (COM (2014) 72 final) 2 Council Conclusions of 27 November 2014 1/10

2. Rationale The EU is clearly in favour of an open, un-fragmented Internet and of a multistakeholder model for Internet governance. Given the transnational and multidimensional nature of the Internet, this approach (as opposed to a government-led approach) has allowed the Internet to flourish, triggering innovation and bringing about the benefits of the digital revolution as we know it today. However, the current multistakeholder model should be further strengthened and improved in order to address legitimacy, transparency, accountability and inclusiveness concerns. This requires a more inclusive dialogue with all players, including those with very different ideas from ours, and more capacity and confidence building to ensure everyone sees the benefits of a bottom-up, multi-stakeholder and inclusive approach to the governance of the Internet. However the complexity of the governance framework and of the huge range of policy areas impacted by the Internet makes it difficult for all to follow and contribute fully. GIPO is the European contribution to create a tool for on-going monitoring, analysis and information-sharing functions, as a resource for the global community. GIPO could play a triple function of (1) building "goodwill" among undecided actors; (2) raising the level of expertise and understanding among all actors, including those that have been marginal actors in Internet governance to date; (3) facilitating the identification and consolidation of a Federation of Internet governance Observatories. GIPO will not replace existing mechanisms and fora where global Internet governance is discussed, such as the Internet Governance Forum. To the contrary, its objective is to be a tool-box for stakeholders and an instrument to strengthen existing Internet policy-making processes, making full use of modern technology. 2/10

3. What is the "GIPO tool" GIPO is not a website in the classical sense where information is posted and edited by owners of the website. It is an automated tool that compiles and analyses information on Internet policy developments, from online sources (including social media) and makes it available to the community for further use. http://observatory.giponet.org/ The Tool is able to perform: Content analysis: 1) Automated keyword extraction from text (semantic tagging). 2) Automated classification (faceted). 3) Filtering and weighting of content Information can be reviewed and classified under predefined themes, including geographical, region, aspect, type of content etc. Machine-readable content for re-use (including an API): GIPO content can be automatically consumed by other IT systems (web content managers, email marketing platforms, desktop & mobile apps, etc.). 3/10

4. GIPO Advisory Group The project has an independent Advisory Group (AG) to provide guidance on all aspects of its evolution and promotion and to ensure that objective assessments are made of progress and needs and that the most up to date issues are addressed. The Advisory Group's main tasks are to: Provide guidance on all aspects of the evolution of GIPO, including - but not limited to - new technological solutions for the tool. Publicise GIPO through their own institutions and networks. Ensure that GIPO remains abreast of topics and that the challenge of 'selectivity' or 'bias' in source selection is minimised. Contribute to the steering of GIPO's development, for instance by highlighting content for the tool's homepage. The mandate of the AG is flexible, and based upon the tasks described above. Each AG member will provide input based on their area of expertise. In establishing the Advisory Group, consideration has been given to ensuring a good balance of Members in terms of diversity of gender, expertise and region List of Members of the Advisory Group as well as working documents can be found at: http://giponet.org/en/advisory-group 5. GIPO Target Groups GIPO target groups can be divided into: 1) Other Internet policy observatories and initiatives GIPO Tool can be used as an automatic information provider for further curation and use by other observatories/initiatives. The overarching goal is to overcome the fragmentation and complexity of information, so we want to avoid creating yet another observatory in competition with existing ones. There are already many online spaces to find information and discuss Internet governance: GIPO does not aim to centralize all this information by replacing the existing spaces. Instead, it should be complementary and federate them. (more details under point 6, "GIPO as a hub for collaboration") 2) Internet governance actors /main events & processes (i.e. national and global Internet Governance Forums) GIPO can be used as a content classification and management tool for documents and communication created pre-, during and post-events/conferences. 4/10

3) Policy-makers, organizations, general public interested in Internet Governance GIPO as an easy-to-use system for obtaining up-to-date information that can be further shaped and ranked in terms of relevance by its users. Universities with Internet governance programmes/curricula are a specific subgroup which might be particularly interested in the tool. 6. GIPO as a hub for collaboration - Federation Roadmap The collaboration with other similar or related initiatives looks promising as the GIPO Tool is the only platform, at least in the current landscape of Internet Governance, that considers other observatories as one of its main target groups. This derives from the core concept that GIPO should be an automated service tool for both final users and other observatories/repositories, most of which are new, small and in fast evolution. They face specific obstacles that GIPO could help address. By relying on GIPO, these platforms will be able to use their often limited financial and human resources more efficiently, shifting focus from investment in technology and content search to content curation and analysis. Over 35 such initiatives have been identified and contacted. (more Info) 7. Future Governance and GIPO Transfer The Commission launched GIPO to get it off and running but was never intended to be the final or sole "owner or operator" once it became operational. The intention was to provide a useful tool for the global Internet community. Discussions are ongoing with organisations interested in collaborating with GIPO and seeing it through to the next phases. This year will be crucial to start considering the possibilities for a transfer of GIPO to other organisations. Contacts will be made with the Internet Governance Forum and possibly other similar or appropriate organisations. 5/10

8. Timeline for the technical development of the GIPO tool June 2015 February 2016 July 2016 December 2016 (closed) beta version 1 st public release (limited functionalities and social media sources) 2 nd public release (incl. dashboard with map & timeline) Final release One year after final release is estimated to be needed for testing the functioning of the tool and to introduce necessary improvements. 9. Outreach and Dissemination A series of webinars and workshops has been organised since the start of the project to update and engage the community in the development of the tool. External speakers and experts are regularly invited according to the topic. Videos and presentations of each session are available on www.giponet.org. List of past and currently planned events: 30.04.2015 1st webinar 04.06.2015 Live event 01.07.2015 2 nd webinar 15.09.2015 3 rd webinar 26.10.2015 4 th webinar Introduction to Global Internet Policy Observatory online platform Co-designing the GIPO platform - 1st live workshop on Global Internet Policy Observatory Open discussion on Key findings from working sessions of Codesigning Global Internet Policy Observatory platform GIPO and taxonomies of the internet governance open collaboration Interactive visualisations for making Internet Governance topics more engaging and explorable 6/10

13.11.2015 Live event 13.11.2015 Roundtable on Building Internet Observatories during IGF2015 GIPO Open Forum during IGF Live Workshop 21.01.2016 5 th webinar 23.02.2016 Towards a federation roadmap of the Internet Governance repositories A guided tour through our GIPO tool! 6 th webinar 20.04.2016 GIPO approach to text analytics and multilingualism 7 th webinar 08.06.2016 Workshop during EuroDIG meeting in Brussels Live event Tbc Workshop during African IGF Live event 10. Background material On the Digital Agenda website: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/news/how-can-we-help-youget-more-involved-internet-governance https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/global-internet-policyobservatory-gipo https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/blog/global-internet-policyobservatory-release-public-beta-version Line up of GIPO webinars and physical events Video of Principal Advisor, Megan Richards, head of the Internet Governance Task Force Blogs http://giponet.org/en/content/line-gipo-events https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jmmvidajia http://giponet.org/en/blogs 7/10

[For additional details or to get the available materials in different format, please contact the responsible official: C. Monti (IGTF) 69467 cristina.monti@ec.europa.eu ] 8/10

FAQs What is the difference between GIPO and a search engine? The Observatory Tool automatically discards undesired non-relevant content and collects only the interesting ones. It assigns scores to the allowed content in order to prioritize and list it as ordered in the Analysis interface. It enriches the content metadata by automatically assigning appropriate tags to every item of content. Is GIPO basically an RSS-feeder? No, GIPO is much more than a simple RSS-feeder. It automatically collects, analyse and process information coming from webpages and social media platforms, including documents, spreadsheets, videos, tweets. It ANALYSES and CLASSIFIES the information for a maximum RELEVANCY and gives it back for FURTHER REUSE. How does GIPO filter the large amount of results? We expect that filtering will be based on user-driven requirements, i.e. GIPO should be tailored to the needs of each particular user. Who is responsible for the content included in GIPO? GIPO is meant to rely as much as feasible on automated collection and processing of data and information from other sources. Therefore, the "raw information" will be the responsibility of the party which has produced it. The team working on GIPO is also assessing the legal implications of hosting information on GIPO and, as necessary, the best procedures to ensure correction and/or removal of wrong / illegal information. Collaboration with other platforms might be useful to exchange best practices in this complex area. What is GIPO approach to multilingualism? Multilingulism is certainly an important aspect of the project. GIPO interface (texts in menus, buttons, messages) is multilingual, meaning that it provides the capability to be extended to any desired language. The taxonomy terms used by the GIPO tool (tags/keywords) will be translated into at least all the official languages of the United Nations (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, Spanish). To do this GIPO Tool performs language substitution of Wikidata labels (using the MediaWiki API). The contents gathered from sources remain in their original language. As the Tool links to the original content at their source, any user can use online translation tools to translate to their preferred language. 9/10