Guide for Short Term Interoperability Revised June 24, 2009

Similar documents
Guide for Short Term Interoperability

Radio Communications Essentials. Module 5: Mutual Aid Agreements and Common Use Channels Mark Conrey

Background. IO-0060A CNTG Report of Committee

Report on the Use of Encryption on the Interoperability Channels

State Plan for Mutual Aid Communications Frequencies. Annex K Version 4.4

The Eleventh Canadian Public Safety Interoperability Workshop Delta Hotels Ottawa City Centre 101 Lyon Street North, Ottawa, ON December 5, 2017

Missouri State Interoperability Executive Committee 700 MHz Interoperable Channel Template

SAN DIEGO COUNTY MUTUAL AID RADIO PLAN

FIRESCOPE Radio Communications Guidelines MACS MULTI-AGENCY COORDINATION SYSTEM PUBLICATION

OREGON WIRELESS INTEROPERABILITY NETWORK (OWIN) PROJECT. Conceptual Design for Radio System, Revision 1 (November 30, 2006) (Deliverable 9-D)

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

LMR Encryption Navigating Recent FCC Rule Changes

FCC NARROWBANDING MANDATES. White Paper

MEMA Narrowbanding Planning Primer

Communications Interoperability- Current Status

March 2014 MACS FIRESCOPE Radio Communications Guidelines MACS 441-1

Arizona Interagency Radio System (AIRS) State Plan Standard Operating Procedures and National Interoperability Shared Channels

Radio Communications Essentials. Module 9: Narrowbanding Pete Peterson

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C

Radio Technology Overview. January 2011

Public Safety Radio Bands. VHF Low Band: 25 MHz to 50 MHz VHF High: 138 MHz to 174 MHz UHF: 408 MHz to 512 MHz 700 MHz (new) 800 MHz 4.

Allied Radio Matrix for Emergency Response (ARMER) Standards, Protocols, Procedures

APCO/NPSTC ANS

Technical Requirements for Land Mobile and Fixed Radio Services Operating in the Bands / MHz and / MHz

3 4 1: 2: SAFECOM : 4: 5: 6: 7: IP

Communications Interoperability is. the ability of public safety emergency. responders to communicate with. whom they need to, when they need

Rulemaking Hearing Rules of the Tennessee Department of Health Bureau of Health Licensure and Regulation Division of Emergency Medical Services

National Interoperability Field Operations Guide

Project 25 Mission Critical PTT

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

National Interoperability Field Operations Guide. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office of Emergency Communications Version 1.

Narrow-banding What It Means to Public Safety Webinar

Unit 5: Frequency Regulations and Usage STUDENT GUIDE

Cross-Border Communication for Public Safety Licensees

The Florida 700 MHz Public Safety Interoperability Channel Plan. Division of Telecommunications

Consultation Paper on Public Safety Radio Interoperability Guidelines

The Benefits of Project 25

Narrowbanding and Public Safety Communications

Wyoming s Statewide Public-Safety Interoperable Radio Communications System WyoLink Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

amplification: The process of increasing the strength of a radio signal.

Santa Barbara County Operational Area Interoperable Communications Study Final Report. June 25, 2012

Standard Operating Procedures

Terminology. 700 MHz: A radio, system or channel that operates within the range of the MHz. These systems may be conventional or trunked.

VHF/UHF Narrowbanding Information for Public Safety Licensees

LMCC Digital Working Group (DWG) Digital vs Analog Frequency Coordination Best Practices

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. ) ) ) ) )

Public Safety Interoperable Communications (PSIC)

System Overview 10/25/2010

MINNESOTA ARES SOG 6-C-001. Standard Operating Guide Simplex Frequency Pool. Jan. 14, 2016

SERS primary mission was to design, purchase, build and operate a county-wide 800 MHz radio system along with supporting infrastructure and

KING COUNTY FIRE RESOURCE PLAN Section 9 King County Radio Interoperability

APCO Emerging Technology Forum Toronto, Canada

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Current Systems. 1 of 6

Before INDUSTRY CANADA Ottawa, Canada

Missouri Statewide Interoperability Network. DNR Park Rangers Conference April 2018

Missouri ARES Interoperability Plan revised 2003 Aug Contributors. Reading this document. Why

1 Regional Committee Positions

NCSL Legislative Summit Improving Emergency Communications

Cross-Border Interoperability Report Overview CANUS CIWG Meeting

Basic Understanding of FCC 700 MHz Rules

July 31, 2007 Chelsea Fallon: (202) Robert Kenny: (202)

Appointments are available the first two weeks of June 2001 (06/04/01 06/15/01) from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

The Professional Consulting Services Communications Consultant E-911. Design Alternatives

Writing Guide for Standard Operating Procedures

SUBJECT: MARIN EMERGENCY RADIO AUTHORITY (MERA) NEXT GENERATION

2 meter refarming proposal. Uniform 15 khz proposal

9-800 MHz Countywide Coordinated Communications System (CCCS) Upgrade

Butler County Department of Emergency Services. Butler County Radio Project Briefing

State of Kansas Field Operations Guide (KS-FOG)

2-800 MHz CCCS Sys Extension

Federal Communications Commission Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau. General Information on VHF/UHF Narrowbanding

INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES V.

Association of Public Safety Communications Officials Standard Committee Crystal McDuffie, Communications Center and 911 Services Manager

IFERN / IFERN 2 Radio Base Stations for all Wisconsin MABAS Divisions/Counties

Frequencies in the VHF and UHF Bands for Use as "Wide Area" Channels and "Common Use" Channels

APCO Technology Forum THE CONVERGENCE OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS IN PUBLIC SAFETY. Andrew M. Seybold

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER. Adopted: June 29, 2010 Released: June 30, 2010

P25 and Interoperability. RadioResource. User Benefits, Cautions and Case Studies. October 2013 MCCmag.com TM

INTEROPERABILITY PLANNING FOR PUBLIC SAFETY

T-Band (UHF MHz) Background, Future and Impacts on New York Revised: February 07, 2018

Amateur Radio Emergency Communications Interoperability Plan

42296 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 137 / Thursday, July 17, 2003 / Rules and Regulations

General Communications Rules of Use. VHF and UHF Conventional Interoperable Channels

Federal Communications Commission FCC Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) )

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MONITORING ASSOCIATION In God We Trust All Others We Monitor

GAO FIRST RESPONDERS. Much Work Remains to Improve Communications Interoperability. Report to Congressional Requesters

NW RAC/RECB Public Safety Communications System Standards, Protocols, Procedures

Project 25 with LTE: Mission Critical PTT Interworking Standards in Development

CIRCULAR NO. O-14. Q & As on the Conversion of Railway Radio Communication to Narrowband Technology

Regional Plan for the Public Safety 700 MHz Band in Region 43 (Washington)

Appendix E: Optimizing FCC Class A Channel Selective (channelized) Signal boosters

Response to Consultation Paper on Public Safety Radio Interoperability Guidelines Notice NO. SMSE

FDOT Upgrades for Interoperability

Summary of All Costs Table

Coordination Policy. Version 1.0 Approved: 18-November-2017

Federal Partnership for Interoperable Communications

MOTOBRIDGE IP Interoperable Solution

CONOPS Interoperability. Maine Emergency Management Agency & Maine Department of Public Safety State of Maine 7/6/2015

Training that is standardized and supports the effective operations of NIIMS.

Transcription:

Oregon State Interoperability Executive Council Guide for Short Term Interoperability Revised The Oregon State Interoperability Executive Council (SIEC) and the State of Oregon encourage Oregon s public safety agencies to develop interoperable communications systems that encompass all of the elements of public safety. To most, the issue of interoperability is a confusing maze of trade journal articles, technical mumbo jumbo, and vendor hype. The SIEC has assembled this guide to assist the non-technical, everyday public safety personnel in achieving simple, short-term interoperability solutions that enhance day-to-day operations and that afford preparation for major multijurisdictional events. These short-term efforts are leading to longer term and much more comprehensive solutions to wireless interoperability for public safety agencies throughout the entire State of Oregon. Note: This guide was initially developed and endorsed by the SIEC in December 2004. Due to changes in the public safety wireless communications marketplace and regulatory environment since that time, the SIEC Technical Committee has worked to revise this guide in several key areas. It is assumed this 2008 version will also need to be revised on at least a two-three year cycle. OWIN: The SIEC provides oversight and policy direction to the Oregon Wireless Interoperability Network (OWIN). At the state level, OWIN is implementing the SIEC s plans for statewide interoperability. In the near term, the SIEC/OWIN direction is to maximize use of nationwide interoperability channels in VHF, UHF, and 800 MHz (NPSPAC) frequency bands. The near term solution uses existing resources: nationwide interoperability frequencies and existing radios. In the longer term, the current OWIN conceptual design envisions implementation of a statewide Internet Protocol network on the state microwave system that addresses enhanced interoperability through the use of statewide programmed connection of systems to each other in a system of systems approach to interoperability. This guide sets recommendations for the near term development of statewide interoperability in Oregon while the longer term solutions are in development. Radio Programming: (Agency specific frequencies) The simplest means to gaining a measure of interoperability is programming existing, operational channels from agencies that are adjacent to each other geographically and that operate in the same frequency band, into your radio. Each county, state agency, municipal and special district radio manager should agree to allow other responders, on the same frequency band, to use their radio system on designated interoperable channels when necessary. Formal, model-agreement can be obtained from the SIEC. As an aside, it is highly recommended that adjacent agencies think about radio templates that follow some predictable rationale and that use common nomenclature for channel identification.

Short Term Interoperability Guide Page 2 (Nationwide Interoperability frequencies) The second simplest means to another level of interoperability is found in the FCC s newly established nationwide interoperability channels. Every portable and mobile radio in Oregon should include all of these interoperable channels that are within the same band of operation as the basic radio. Interoperability Channels are available in all of the public safety bands and are designed to allow folks to communicate anywhere in the country, within each frequency band. Make sure new radios you purchase have adequate channel capacity to accommodate all of the additional interoperability channels. It is the SIEC s recommendation for both interoperability and for the receipt of federal funds based upon interoperable communications that these nationwide interoperability channels shall be programmed into every Oregon public safety subscriber radio. In VHF subscriber radios, the other channels that should be in every radio are the State Fire Net (154.280 MHz) and the State Police Net OPEN, (155.475 MHz). VHF Interoperability channels can be utilized on a secondary basis to interoperable communications for day-to-day tactical needs as well, so that personnel are accustomed to utilizing them. OWIN is working in a partnership with the Federal Partnership for Interoperable Communications (FPIC) on improving nationwide interoperable frequency utility. The most notable enhancement is expected to involve adding federal radio frequencies to the FCC s VHF nationwide interoperability channels to make repeater operation possible in the VHF band. Repeater operation is already possible in the UHF, 700 MHz, and 800 MHz bands. At the present time only simplex (car-to-car) tactical use of the VHF frequencies is possible. In accordance with SEIC policy, the FPIC/OWIN partnership is aimed at extending unencumbered access to all levels of government to the type of interoperability network OWIN may install under the SIEC s guidance. As federal frequencies may be added in the Oregon system, this Short Term Guide will be revised. 800 MHZ (NPSPAC) frequencies are currently in a rebanding process in order to remove commercial system interference to public safety systems. This rebanding process will result in a need to reprogram in nationwide, 800 MHz interoperability channels in the near future. As the rebanding process is finalized, this Short Term Guide will be revised. The following is the SIEC s guide for programming the FCC designated interoperability (I/O) channels into existing radios and all new radios that are added to any system. Due to space limitations in some radios, it may not be possible to program all of the I/O channels into all radios. In that case, the calling channel and the first tactical channel should be programmed at a minimum. The frequencies listed are in each of the three bands and are listed by order of priority, with highest priority shown at the top of the list. They are to be programmed into the radios with the highest priority first, as space permits. Note: As of January 1, 2005, existing systems on these channels and those existing systems on the adjacent channels become secondary to these interoperability channels. In the event of interference, existing systems must cease use when interference occurs to interoperability channels.

Short Term Interoperability Guide Page 3 VHF Radios Channel (MHz) NPSTC Name Short Name Description 155.7525 base/mobile VCALL10* VCAL10* National Calling 151.1375 base/mobile VTAC11* VTAC11* National Tactical 154.4525 base/mobile VTAC12* VTAC12* National Tactical 158.7375 base/mobile VTAC13* VTAC13* National Tactical 159.4725 base/mobile VTAC14* VTAC14* National Tactical UHF Radios Channel (MHz) NPSTC Name Short Name Description 458.2125 mobile UCAL40 UCAL41 National Calling 453.2125 base/mobile UCAL40D CAL40D National Calling 458.4625 mobile UTAC41 UTAC42 National Tactical 453.4625 base/mobile UTAC41D TAC41D National Tactical 458.7125 mobile UTAC42 UTAC43 National Tactical 453.7125 base/mobile UTAC42D TAC42D National Tactical 458.8625 mobile UTAC43 UTAC44 National Tactical 453.8625 base/mobile UTAC43D TAC43D National Tactical 800 MHz Radios PRE Rebanding** Channel (MHz) NPSTC Name Description 821.0125 Mobile ICALL National Calling 866.0125 Base/mobile ICALL National Calling 821.5125 Mobile ITAC-1 National Tactical 866.5125 Base/mobile ITAC-1 National Tactical 822.0125 Mobile ITAC-2 National Tactical 867.0125 Base/mobile ITAC-2 National Tactical 822.5125 Mobile ITAC-3 National Tactical 867.5125 Base/mobile ITAC-3 National Tactical 823.0125 Mobile ITAC-4 National Tactical 868.0125 Base/mobile ITAC-4 National Tactical 821.3250 Mobile OROPS1 Oregon Tactical 866.3250 Base/mobile OROPS1D Oregon Tactical 821.3875 Mobile OROPS2 Oregon Tactical 866.3875 Base/mobile OROPS2D Oregon Tactical 821.7500 Mobile OROPS3 Oregon Tactical 866.7500 Base/mobile OROPS3D Oregon Tactical 821.7750 Mobile OROPS4 Oregon Tactical 866.7750 Base/mobile OROPS4D Oregon Tactical

Short Term Interoperability Guide Page 4 821.8000 Mobile OROPS5 Oregon Tactical 866.8000 Base/mobile OROPS5D Oregon Tactical 867.5375 Base/mobile WAOPS1 Washington Tactical 867.5625 Base/mobile WAOPS2 Washington Tactical 867.5875 Base/mobile WAOPS3 Washington Tactical 867.6125 Base/mobile WAOPS4 Washington Tactical 867.6375 Base/mobile WAOPS5 Washington Tactical 800 MHz Radios POST Rebanding** Channel (MHz) NPSTC Name Short Name Description 806.0125 Mobile 8CAL90 CAL91 National Calling 851.0125 Base/mobile 8CAL90D CAL90D National Calling 806.5125 Mobile 8TAC91 TAC92 National Tactical 851.5125 Base/mobile 8TAC91D TAC91D National Tactical 807.0125 Mobile 8TAC92 TAC93 National Tactical 852.0125 Base/mobile 8TAC92D TAC92D National Tactical 807.5125 Mobile 8TAC93 TAC94 National Tactical 852.5125 Base/mobile 8TAC93D TAC93D National Tactical 808.0125 Mobile 8TAC94 TAC95 National Tactical 853.0125 Base/mobile 8TAC94D TAC94D National Tactical 806.3250 Mobile OROPS1 Oregon Tactical 851.3250 Base/mobile OROPS1D Oregon Tactical 806.3875 Mobile OROPS2 Oregon Tactical 851.3875 Base/mobile OROPS2D Oregon Tactical 806.7500 Mobile OROPS3 Oregon Tactical 851.7500 Base/mobile OROPS3D Oregon Tactical 806.7750 Mobile OROPS4 Oregon Tactical 851.7750 Base/mobile OROPS4D Oregon Tactical 806.8000 Mobile OROPS5 Oregon Tactical 851.8000 Base/mobile OROPS5D Oregon Tactical 852.5375 Base/mobile WAOPS1 Washington Tactical 852.5625 Base/mobile WAOPS2 Washington Tactical 852.5875 Base/mobile WAOPS3 Washington Tactical 852.6125 Base/mobile WAOPS4 Washington Tactical 852.6375 Base/mobile WAOPS5 Washington Tactical * Note: In the future, these channels will change from simplex analog to repeater analog and digital channels ** Rebanding: FCC mandated reconfiguration of 800MHz band (a.k.a. Nextel Rebanding or Consensus Plan)

Short Term Interoperability Guide Page 5 Use of interoperability channels General SIEC statement. The SIEC has adopted a policy that is aimed at allowing both operability and interoperability of nationwide interoperability channels. Through allowing a controlled and monitored level of operability on these channels, the SIEC expects to assure that the channels are implemented, are normally tested through day-to-day use, are maintained, and are available when needed for interoperability purposes. The SIEC has also endorsed, unencumbered access by federal, state, local, and tribal entities to the use of these channels. This policy foresees that these channels can have controlled and monitored use between agencies and jurisdictions and solely by those agencies and jurisdictions as well. Calling channel: The calling channel shall be used to contact other users in the Region for the purpose of requesting incident related information and assistance and for setting up tactical communications for specific events. In most cases, the calling party will be asked to move from the Calling Channel to one of the TAC channels for continuing incident operations or other interoperability communication needs. This channel can be implemented in full repeat mode in 450 MHz or 800 MHz systems. In the 150 MHz, 450 MHz, and 800 MHz bands, direct, or a talk around/simplex mode can be used. Note: WAOPS is simplex only as per the Region 43 Regional Plan for 800 MHz. Tactical channel: By FCC rules, the tactical channels are to be used for coordination activity between different agencies in a mutual aid situation, but in non-interference instances, they may be used on a case-by-case basis for emergency activities of a single agency. Incidents requiring multi-agency participation will be coordinated over these channels by the agency controlling the incident. These channels can be implemented in full repeat mode in 450 MHz or 800 MHz or they may be used on a direct (talk-around/simplex) mode in 150 MHz, 450 MHz or 800. Dispatch Centers and Interoperability: The SIEC endorsed a SIEC Policy Action 09-2007 on March 13, 2007. That policy action concerned a Memorandum of Understanding calling for potential licensees of the VHF, UHF and 700/800 MHz nationwide interoperability channels to voluntarily refrain from installing or requesting Fixed Base Station licenses until a coordinated effort to limit interference and monitor those channels is put in place by the SIEC. The SIEC is working on longer term methods of coordination of interoperability channels on a statewide basis. Gateways, Interoperability Switches, or console patching, are strongly encouraged at 9-1-1 dispatch centers in the short term to allow connection of interoperable VHF, UHF, and NPSPAC channels to the operating channels within the center s range. Purchasing New Radios and Systems: If your agency is in the market to purchase new subscriber radios or a new radio system, you may choose to utilize the SIEC Technical Committee as a sounding board to help clear the confusion and provide guidance and suggestions to assure maximum interoperability in the most effective manner. By FCC rules, all new VHF and/or UHF systems (meaning below 512 MHz) shall be implemented using narrowband (12.5 khz bandwidth) technology.

Short Term Interoperability Guide Page 6 Note: As of January 1, 2011, FCC rules will no longer allow manufacture or importation of any radio that has a mode in it that works on existing wide band systems. Short_Term_Interoperability_Guidelines_Adopted_5-08-07 Note: If your agency intends to remain on VHF and/or UHF public safety radio frequencies, it is important to start the migration to meet FCC timelines for conversion to narrowband operation. The mandate for a complete conversion to narrowband operation is January 1, 2013 When purchasing new VHF and/or UHF portable or mobile radios make sure they are narrowband compatible. This is consistent with FCC requirements. All VHF radios must be capable of adhering to FCC channel bandwidth, efficiency and frequency channelization rules. Note: The I/O frequencies will operate in the analog narrowband mode. If a CTCSS (Continuous Tone Coded Squelch System) tone is needed, it will be 156.7 Hz. Normally it would be recommended that all receivers and all transmitters use CTCSS. The SIEC s recommendation for priority in receipt of federal funding for interoperable communications is to strongly encourage conversion to digital technologies. The primary reason is that digital technologies operate in only 72% of the band occupied by narrowband analog technologies, and they suffer no reduction in voice quality or in system range with this added efficiency. The SIEC recommends that all radios procured under interoperability shall be, at a minimum, capable of programmable conversion from analog to digital operation. The only acceptable digital operation is in compliance with the Project 25 standards. The applicable standards are within the ANSI/TIA/EIA 102 series. All portions of that standard that define the common air interface and the vocoder are to be complied with. Whenever encryption is also used, the Project 25 encryption documents must be complied with as well. It is suggested that you consider the use of multimode (digital and analog) technologies, and multi-band operation as these features might become available. You may choose to not implement Project 25 technologies while you are continuing to operate or are building an analog system. All Homeland Security grant funding promotes interoperable communications and recommends adherence to open architecture technologies and Project 25 standards. Note: If you build a new system or convert an existing one to narrowband it is likely that some of your older mobile and portable radios will not work on the narrowband frequencies, however, you ll need to verify with your vendor. The newer radios will work in both modes.

Short Term Interoperability Guide Page 7 Reference documents: National Public Safety Telecommunications Council s Channel Naming Report, June 2007. 23 June 2009 <http://www.npstc.org/documents/io-0060b- 20070612%20Standard%20Channel%20Nomenclature%20Final.pdf> NPSTC Channel Naming Plan- Short Name Supplemental Addendum, May 2008. 23 June 2009 <http://www.npstc.org/documents/npstc%20channel%20naming%20plan- %20Short%20Name%20Supplemental%20Addendum.doc>