DRS Electronic Warfare Operational Awareness Simulation/Support and Diagnostics

Similar documents
Warfighter Information Network Solicitation #: W15P7T-13-R0059 DRS Network and Imaging Systems

Keysight Technologies Virtual Flight Testing of Radar System Performance Using SystemVue and STK

Leveraging Digital RF Memory Electronic Jammers for Modern Deceptive Electronic Attack Systems

Integrated Multi-Sensor Testing of EW/Radar Platforms Dr. Bob Andrews

Passive Radars as Sources of Information for Air Defence Systems

The Challenge: Increasing Accuracy and Decreasing Cost

AN/ALE-55 Fiber-Optic Towed Decoy ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS

Addressing the Challenges of Radar and EW System Design and Test using a Model-Based Platform

Simulation Techniques & Systems for EW Test & Evaluation

Spectrum Management. Justin Taylor ATS systems

3 Planning the Jamming Operation

Electronic Warfare (EW) Principles and Overview p. 1 Electronic Warfare Taxonomy p. 6 Electronic Warfare Definitions and Areas p.

ASM(AR) Demonstration Engagements Anti-Ship Missile Active Radar Homing

EW Self Protection Systems.

Lecture 3 SIGNAL PROCESSING

A MINI REVIEW ON RADAR FUNDAMENTALS AND CONCEPT OF JAMMING

Introduction to Electronic Defence EEE5106S

Automotive Radar Sensors and Congested Radio Spectrum: An Urban Electronic Battlefield?

A Review of Vulnerabilities of ADS-B

Broadband GPS Data Capture for Signal and Interference Analysis

The Importance of Bit Depth in GNSS Record and Playback Testing

TACOT Project. Trusted multi Application receiver for Trucks. Bordeaux, 4 June 2014

REMOTE SITE MONITORING

Radar Environment RF Generation. Dr. Steffen Heuel Technology Manager Aerospace & Defense Rohde & Schwarz Munich, Germany

WHY TOTAL CONTROL? Key features:

Larry E. Corey Program Manager

January 16, 2011 Scott Burgett, Bronson Hokuf Garmin International, Olathe, Kansas

CONVERGENCE BETWEEN SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SUPPORT MEASURES

Leadership built upon facts Cobham SATCOM Maritime communication solutions

Jamming Calculations

EC312 Lesson 20: Electronic Warfare (3/20/14)

Correlated, Real Time Multi-spectral Sensor Test and Evaluation (T&E) in an Installed Systems Test Facility (ISTF) Using High Performance Computing

Real-Time Spectrum Monitoring System Provides Superior Detection And Location Of Suspicious RF Traffic

Failing EMC testing? > 50% of products fail EMC testing first time around

2018 HSS Development

Aprisa XE Performance and Monitoring Data

SAfety VEhicles using adaptive Interface Technology (SAVE-IT): A Program Overview

Wind Turbine Analysis for. Cape Cod Air Force Station Early Warning Radar. and Beale Air Force Base Upgraded Early Warning Radar.

Explanation of Experiments and Need for Experimental License for use of Several Frequency Bands for Lab and Factory Missile Communications Testing

BEYOND RADAR ERA MILITARY SOLUTIONS. Surveillance Reconnaissance Military ATM Command&Control Systems

The Effect of Radio Frequency Interference on GNSS Signals and Mitigation Techniques Presented by Dr. Tarek Attia

iq.link Key Features Comsearch A CommScope Company

PETER CLARKE - EW ANALYSIS & INTEGRATION

Quick Site Testing with the 8800SX

Keysight EEsof EDA Generating Multi-Dimensional Signals to Test Radar/EW Systems. Application Note

Amendment 0002 Special Notice N SN-0006 Future X-Band Radar (FXR) Industry Day

3H Communication. Filters, Multiplexers, Switch Filter Banks and RF Front-End Assemblies. Relentless Innovations. Systems

ABBREVIATIONS. jammer-to-signal ratio

CHECK OUT OUR WEBSITE SOME TIME FOR PLENTY OF ARTICES ABOUT SELF DEFENSE, SURVIVAL, FIREARMS AND MILITARY MANUALS.

Wireless technologies Test systems

Contactless snooping: Assessing the real threats

Automatic Dependent Surveillance -ADS-B

By Gokula Krishnan S. Generated by Foxit PDF Creator Foxit Software For evaluation only.

Frequency Diversity Radar

The Next Generation of Secure Position, Navigation and Timing Technology

EMIT. RF Cosite and Coexistence RFI Modeling and Mitigation

RPAS & MANNED AIRCRAFT

GIRAFFE 8A AESA 3D LONG RANGE RADAR

Reducing Test Flights Using Simulated Targets and a Carefully Chosen Set-up

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Valadez, (703) or Pamela

vstasker 6 A COMPLETE MULTI-PURPOSE SOFTWARE TO SPEED UP YOUR SIMULATION PROJECT, FROM DESIGN TIME TO DEPLOYMENT REAL-TIME SIMULATION TOOLKIT FEATURES

Fundamental Concepts of Radar

palm-size radio planning

ICO S-BAND ANTENNAS TEST PROGRAM

Chapter 4. Meaconing, Intrusion, Jamming, and Interference Reporting

Countering Capability A Model Driven Approach

TReX Questions (dlvc) 1. Will the dlvc Prototype have to broadcast on all 64 specified channels simultaneously or is the intent to provide a

CELL PHONE JAMMERS. By Priyanjali (472) A.Divya (466) SPHOORTHY ENGINEERING COLLEGE

Advanced geolocation capabilities

Adaptable C5ISR Instrumentation

GNSS Threats at Airports and detecting them

Principles of Pulse-Doppler Radar p. 1 Types of Doppler Radar p. 1 Definitions p. 5 Doppler Shift p. 5 Translation to Zero Intermediate Frequency p.

What is New in Wireless System Design

MULTI-CHANNEL SAR EXPERIMENTS FROM THE SPACE AND FROM GROUND: POTENTIAL EVOLUTION OF PRESENT GENERATION SPACEBORNE SAR

Copyright 2016 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved. Customer Success Is Our Mission is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.

Framework and the Live, Virtual, and Constructive Continuum. Paul Lawrence Hamilton Director, Modeling and Simulation

Radio Frequency Interference Detection to Support the Use of GNSS in ITS

RECEIVER TYPES AND CHARACTERISTICS

Air Force Flight Test Center. Defending Our Spectrum: What Do You Mean When You Say You ve Used Spectrum

A Novel Technique or Blind Bandwidth Estimation of the Radio Communication Signal

Using A Virtual BAF in EW Testing

National Data Links: Waveform Design and its role in Modern Electronic Warfare operations

Flight Data Systems Pathfinder Remote ADS-B Receiver Equipment Supplement

AAAA Aircraft Survivability Equipment Symposium

Evolution of the Modern Receiver in a Crowded Spectrum Environment White Paper

Phantom Dome - Advanced Drone Detection and jamming system

39N6E KASTA-2E2 Low-Altitude 3D All-Round Surveillance Radar

ELECTRONIC WARFARE. Robert Inkol. Defence Research and Development Canada

The Swedish Armed Forces Sensor Study

Operation Blue Metal Event Outline. Participant Requirements. Patronage Card

Navigation für herausfordernde Anwendungen Robuste Satellitennavigation für sicherheitskritische Anwendungen

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL & INFORMATION ENGINEERING PROJECT PRESENTATION

RF 1090 MHZ BAND LOAD MODEL

Tailored Tactical Surveillance

C3i Magazine Nr.1 (1992) A Hornet Leader TDA Jeff Petraska

Digital Sounder: HF Diagnostics Module:Ionosonde Dual Channel ( ) Eight Channel ( )

FAQs on AESAs and Highly-Integrated Silicon ICs page 1

DEFENSE and SECURITY RIGEL ES AND. Defense and security in five continents. indracompany.com

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F.1097 * (Question ITU-R 159/9)

Transcription:

DRS Electronic Warfare Operational Awareness Mission Scenario Generation and Simulation Author: Dr. Bruce Holley BSc MSc PhD CEng CPhys MInstP MIET Eur Ing Head of Air Systems LOB, DRS (UK)

DRS ELECTRONIC WARFARE OPERATIONAL AWARENESS SIMULATION/SUPPORT AND DIAGNOSTICS Mission Scenario Generation and Simulation DRS is currently working on a new concept which will enhance the effectiveness of its successful in service Electronic Warfare (EW) Tiered Testing Capability. This new development is termed Operator Awareness. In simple terms, it utilizes the test program data used to stimulate EW systems and uses it to demonstrate an operational EW scenario which can be used in a classroom environment or on a platform to enhance EW Operational Awareness. This paper outlines the details of this new concept. The principles of Operator Awareness are to provide operators with a last minute awareness of threat signals which might be encountered during an in-flight operational mission. These Operator Awareness sessions would essentially take place during the pre-flight briefing sessions to aircrew prior to operations, and would provide them with a last minute reminder of the various threat signals that might be encountered on their mission. The benefits of this pre-flight awareness is that it would provide aircrew with a last minute EW situational awareness update, thereby reinforcing the EW training they will have received during their routine Full Mission Simulator Training sessions performed on the platform simulators. This last minute situational awareness is considered to be extremely beneficial as routine Simulator Training sessions are normally scheduled weeks in advance and only routinely performed as part of compulsory scheduled training flight training. Therefore, the DRS Operator Awareness sessions will provide a significant enhancement to this routine simulator training. It should also prove to be extremely cost effective as additional simulator sessions are very expensive and difficult to schedule as platform simulators tend to be in high demand. The main benefits of the DRS pre-flight awareness are as follows: Set up a Mission Scenario by programming a selection of EW Warning Signals which may be encountered during a proposed Mission. Run a Mission to enable Operator Awareness of EW Warning Tones/Threat TAGS under conditions which may be encountered during the Mission. Increase Operational Awareness of signals outside the Missile Engagement Zone: Mobile phone signals, domestic air Traffic control RADARs, friendly RADARS etc. Increase Operational Awareness of the effect/impact of EW System Counter Measures on a particular threat scenario. Indications of when countermeasures are deployed. New emerging threat scenarios can be quickly programmed and demonstrated to operational crews. New threat scenarios could be demonstrated in a very short time frame prior to an operational mission. Operator Awareness can be of significant value if used during aircrew de-briefing sessions to re-run a mission in order to assess the functionality of a platforms EW System during a Mission. 1

How Does it Work? The DRS stimulation/test system transmits simulated signal data into an EW systems antennas via small anechoic chambers called hoods. It should be noted that these hoods can be used on Rx and Tx systems e.g. ESM, MAWs jammers etc. The Maintainer/Operator can then verify if the simulated threat is being displayed on the platforms displays by comparing the platforms displays with a hand held tablet display showing the output from the DRS stimulator and thereby determine the functionality of the EW equipment. In consequence, the DRS concept of operational awareness is to use the DRS stimulator in a classroom environment with the stimulation being displayed on a large monitor. Figure 1 shows a typical display that might be used. Fig 1. This display indicates the type of signal that might be received by the platforms EW system. The position of the TAG represents the signal position relative to platform and its signal strength. Mission Scenario Generation Having the ability to stimulate signals the platform might encounter on a mission, the next stage is to put the stimulated signals into a mission scenario that a platform might encounter. The DRS stimulator is programmed to run a sequential signal generation program consisting of different threat signals: Threatening, friendly and at varying signal levels to represent different ranges. It should be noted that it is not the intention of DRS to stimulate a multi threat environment as there are other far more capable stimulators to carry out these type of scenarios. The purpose of the DRS concept is to ensure there is a very good operator awareness of signals that are related to real threats that could seriously damage or destroy a platform. Figure 2. Shows how a typical mission scenario might be developed. Using Figure 2, The following mission scenario can be generated: The mission scenario is overlaid on a map/grid system. This can be in any elevation such that terrain masking can be simulated by varying received signal power. 2

Figure 2. Mission Scenario Generation. Signal Generation Type Point 1. Start Mission: ATC RADARS, mobile phones etc. Point 2. Early Warning RADARS. Small amount of jamming. Point 3. Early Warning RADARS, Fire Control RADAR weak signal no threat. Point 4. Fire Control RADAR strong signal countermeasures activated - Alarms. Point 5. RPG type threat. RF MAWS activated. Fire Control RADAR No alarm Point 6. Airborne missile tracking RADAR strong signal countermeasures activated Alarms. The Mission Dependent Data (MDD) used to generate the previously described scenario can be either actual signal data or made up training signal data. However, as the simulation data is being generated by the DRS simulation system it can be programmed to the same sensitivity levels the actual platform will detect and display. In other words, the display simulation will replicate a received signal TAG in the same relative position in the simulation as will be seen on the actual platform display. This level of sensitivity accuracy is due to the sensitivity of each EW equipped platform being known because it is stimulated/tested using the DRS hoods and stimulator which provide accurate Rx and Tx parameters sensitivity, TAG, Power, Modulation etc. Moreover, the mission scenario described above could replicate, a greater level of received signal authenticity by simulating signals at varying power levels, superimposing noise and spurious signals depending on the complexity of the scenario being generated. 3

One of the major advantages of using this concept is that the theory in the classroom can then be replicated on an operational platform to ensure the platform systems are capable of detecting and countering the mission scenario generated threats. Summary DRS is currently developing a new concept using their highly regarded in service EW stimulation equipment. This new concept is called Operational Awareness and is designed to enhance full mission simulator training. This is achieved by providing a quick and simple classroom stimulation utilizing the signal generation capability from the DRS stimulation equipment and modifying it to replicate an EW mission scenario using either real or training signal data, to demonstrate typical threats or friendly signals at different power levels. These signals therefore correlate to near or far signal sources which can also include terrain masking etc. In addition, the fidelity of the signal data can be degraded using noise or interference to replicate jamming etc. The data being displayed in the classroom environment exactly replicates the signal data seen on the platform displays as the DRS stimulation/test equipment is designed to evaluate the signal sensitivity of an EW system. Therefore, the scenario generation is simply a replay of the platforms EW sensitivity across its complete frequency range. Moreover, the stimulation equipment can be quickly programmed to take into account any new and emerging threat generation signal systems and demonstrate how an EW system will react to them. DRS believe this new Operational Awareness concept using the DRS stimulator and hoods is a unique and an extremely cost effective method of demonstrating how EW systems will react in an actual operational signal environment and thereby providing operators with a better understanding of how to interpret EW displays and performance prior to an operational or EW training mission. 4