REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) United States Marine Corps Experimental Forward Operating Base (ExFOB) 2014

Similar documents
This announcement constitutes a Request for Information (RFI) notice for planning purposes.

Jerome Tzau TARDEC System Engineering Group. UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release. 14 th Annual NDIA SE Conf Oct 2011

U.S. ARMY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING COMMAND

Technology readiness applied to materials for fusion applications

Technology Readiness Assessment of Department of Energy Waste Processing Facilities: When is a Technology Ready for Insertion?

The use of technical readiness levels in planning the fusion energy development

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

DMTC Guideline - Technology Readiness Levels

Technology readiness evaluations for fusion materials science & technology

Application of computational M&S for product development in Systems Engineering Framework

Intermediate Systems Acquisition Course. Lesson 2.2 Selecting the Best Technical Alternative. Selecting the Best Technical Alternative

Office of Small and Medium Enterprises (OSME) Bureau des petites et moyennes entreprises (BPME)

Office of Technology Development (OTD) Gap Fund

Technology Development Stages and Market Readiness

Lesson 17: Science and Technology in the Acquisition Process

The Application of Technology Readiness Levels in Planning the Fusion Energy Sciences Program. M. S. Tillack. ARIES Project Meeting 4 5 September2008

Technology & Manufacturing Readiness RMS

UNCLASSIFIED FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2009 BUDGET ESTIMATES

Mid Term Exam SES 405 Exploration Systems Engineering 3 March Your Name

TRL Corollaries for Practice-Based Technologies

ARTES Competitiveness & Growth Full Proposal. Requirements for the Content of the Technical Proposal. Part 3B Product Development Plan

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT IN DOD ACQUISITION

Understand that technology has different levels of maturity and that lower maturity levels come with higher risks.

Technology Readiness for the Smart Grid

Air Force Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Technology and Manufacturing Readiness Levels [Draft]

Module 2 Lesson 201 Project Coordinator (PC) Duties

Technical Exploitation Support Request for Information (RFI)

Program Success Through SE Discipline in Technology Maturity. Mr. Chris DiPetto Deputy Director Developmental Test & Evaluation October 24, 2006

TRLs and MRLs: Supporting NextFlex PC 2.0

NAVY SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS

Demonstration System Development for Advanced Shipboard Desalination FNC

2016 Smart Cities Survey Summary Report of Survey Results

Incorporating a Test Flight into the Standard Development Cycle

ONR BAA Affordable Electronically Scanned Array Technology for Next Generation Naval Platforms. Questions & Answers 3/21/07

Development of a Manufacturability Assessment Methodology and Metric

Science & Technology for the Objective Force

Manufacturing Readiness Assessment Overview

Report to Congress regarding the Terrorism Information Awareness Program

Business Models Summary 12/12/2017 1

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Introduction to SECURE Program

A Translation of the Contracting Alphabet: From BAAs to OTAs

Physics-Based Modeling In Design & Development for U.S. Defense Virtual Prototyping & Product Development. Jennifer Batson Ab Hashemi

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Non-lethal Electromagnetic Stand-off Weapon

Expression Of Interest

Regulatory Science For Innovation

DoD Research and Engineering

In Space Propulsion Overview January Outline. Les Johnson Manager, In Space Propulsion Technology Projects Office

Hardware Modeling and Machining for UAV- Based Wideband Radar

Columbia Communications District Request for Information New Radio Communications System

AF Life Cycle Management Center

Fast Track to Innovation A 3 Million Opportunity

Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs) and Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs)

Readiness Assessment for Video Cell Phones SE 602

DoD Research and Engineering Enterprise

Prototyping: Accelerating the Adoption of Transformative Capabilities

The ESA A&R technology R&D

Air Force Research Laboratory

Technical Readiness Level For Plasma Control

Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs) Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs) In an S&T Environment

Building a Solar PV Roadmap The National Academies July 29, Ken Zweibel GW Solar Institute The George Washington University

Realization of Fusion Energy: How? When?

Committee on Astrobiology & Planetary Science (CAPS) Michael H. New, PhD Astrobiology Discipline Scientist

The ARTES Technologies and Products programme and the Megaconstellations opportunity

Disruptive Aerospace Innovation Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board National Academy of Engineering

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Guide to Preparing an Application for Permit under the Marine Renewable-energy Act

Distribution Statement A (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)

The MARS Helicopter and Lessons for SATCOM Testing

SIMULATION-BASED ACQUISITION: AN IMPETUS FOR CHANGE. Wayne J. Davis

Digital Engineering (DE) and Computational Research and Engineering Acquisition Tools and Environments (CREATE)

NASA Cost Symposium Multivariable Instrument Cost Model-TRL (MICM-TRL)

TRANSFORMING DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY INTO OPPORTUNITY MARKET PLACE CHANGE & THE COOPERATIVE

APPLICATION OF INTEGRATION READINESS LEVEL IN ASSESSING TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION RISKS IN A DOD ACQUISITION PROGRAM

Presented at the 2017 ICEAA Professional Development & Training Workshop. TRL vs Percent Dev Cost Final.pptx

BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT FY12 TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION MISSIONS PROGRAM OFFICE OF THE CHIEF TECHNOLOGIST PROPOSALS DUE.

ROI of Technology Readiness Assessments Using Real Options: An Analysis of GAO Data from 62 U.S. DoD Programs by David F. Rico

The LVCx Framework. The LVCx Framework An Advanced Framework for Live, Virtual and Constructive Experimentation

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2002

Impact of Technology Readiness Levels on Aerospace R&D

High Explosive Radio Telemetry System. Federal Manufacturing & Technologies. R. Johnson, FM&T; B. Mclaughlin, FM&T;

Technology readiness assessments: A retrospective

DoD Research and Engineering Enterprise

DARPA/DSO 101. Dr. Valerie Browning Director Defense Sciences Office. March 2018

Foundations Required for Novel Compute (FRANC) BAA Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Updated: October 24, 2017

National Shipbuilding Research Program

Founding Manifesto Friends of Floating Offshore Wind 18 May 2016


Post Sanction Guidelines for BIG Beneficiaries

PROGRAM UPDATEPDATE. Has anyone heard any good rumors lately? Steve Guilfoos AF SBIR/STTR Program Manager Spring 2007

Engineered Resilient Systems NDIA Systems Engineering Conference October 29, 2014

Manufacturing Readiness Assessments of Technology Development Projects

An Update on the Radiation Portal Monitor Program

ECSEL JU Update. Andreas Wild Executive Director

Basque Country. RIS3 EUSKADI & ADVANCED MANUFACTURING STRATEGY Basque Industry 4.0

H2020 Theme Oriented Training on ICT. H2020 Overview. Thies Wittig. Deputy Team Leader Project "Turkey in Horizon 2020"

Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA) Advanced Technology Support Program IV (ATSP4) Organizational Perspective and Technical Requirements

Transcription:

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) United States Marine Corps Experimental Forward Operating Base (ExFOB) 2014 OVERVIEW: This announcement constitutes a Request for Information (RFI) notice for planning purposes. The next Experimental Forward Operating Base demonstration (ExFOB 2014) will be held at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, from 12 16 May 2014. The focus of ExFOB 2014 is TACTICAL ENERGY HARVESTING. The due date for responses to this RFI is midnight EST on 21 February 2014. ABOUT EXFOB: Created by the Commandant in 2009, ExFOB brings together stakeholders from across the Marine Corps requirements, acquisition, and technology development communities in a dynamic process to quickly evaluate and deploy technologies that reduce battlefield energy and water requirements. Once per year, the Marine Corps invites select industry participants to ExFOB to demonstrate off-theshelf technologies with potential to address current Marine Corps capability gaps. ExFOB is not a tradeshow. During the week-long demonstration, a team of engineers will collect data on system performance and Marine operators will provide qualitative feedback on what they see. Following the demonstration, promising technologies will be evaluated in a controlled lab environment and then put into the hands of Marines for field testing in combat conditions. Lab and field evaluation results will inform requirements development and may ultimately lead to fielding of systems in support of a more combateffective fighting force. TACTICAL ENERGY HARVESTING: The Marine Corps is pursuing a range of material solutions to reduce battlefield energy and water requirements. In current operations, there are a number of untapped energy streams that, if harnessed, could enable Marines to get more out of every gallon of fuel they use. The Marine Corps ExFOB team is conducting market research on currently available technologies that can harvest energy from Marines on patrol and from generators, extending the operational reach of the Corps. Specific energy harvesting scenarios and examples of potential technologies of interest are as follows: 1. Marines on Patrol - Scenario: Harvest energy from a ~160 lb. Marine carrying a 50-90 lb. pack moving at a rate of 2-6 miles per hour. The harvested energy should flow back into a standard BB2590 battery (or similar). - Examples of Harvesting Technologies: o Kinetic energy (knee brace, backpack) o Energy from body heat o Nano technology in fabric o Vibration technology o Wearable solar

NOTE: It is not the intent of this RFI to identify solar technologies that would compete with on-going efforts such as the Improved Solar Panel program. Any solar technology submitted in response to this RFI must be lightweight, wearable, and generate a minimum of 20 Watts per lb. We will not accept ground-deployed systems. 2. Generators - Scenario: Harvest energy from USMC tactical quiet generators (TQGs) (size: 10/30/60kW) operating for 8 hours per day at pre-determined loads. Participants should expect generator waste heat temperatures of approximately 500 degrees Fahrenheit or below and flow rates of approximately 50 standard cubic feet per minute (scfm). Exact generator waste heat temperatures and flow rates will be provided prior to the event. Generators may be provided for companies demonstrating generator waste heat recovery technologies. However, permanent modifications to Government Furnished Equipment WILL NOT be permitted. - Examples of Harvesting Technologies: o Waste heat recovery & conversion to power/water o Waste heat recovery for climate control 3. Other - While the ExFOB team is primarily interested in technologies that harvest energy from Marines on the move and from standard issue generators, we are open to other energy harvesting technologies for specific applications. SUBMISSION PROCESS AND DUE DATE: To respond to this RFI, please complete the attached ExFOB Submission Form and send via e-mail to: energy@usmc.mil. Please do not attach marketing brochures, test reports, or other extraneous materials to your Submission Form as they will not be reviewed. The due date for responses to this RFI is midnight EST on 21 February 2014. If your technology is of interest, the ExFOB Team will contact you with an invitation to participate in ExFOB 2014 at Marine Corp Base Camp Pendleton, CA, from 12 through 16 May 2014. All companies will be notified of invitation/non-invitation decisions in mid-march. NOTE: This RFI is issued for the purpose of determining market capability of sources and does not constitute an Invitation for Bid (IFB), a Request for Proposal (RFP), a Request for Quote (RFQ) or an indication that the Government will contract for any of the items and/or services contained in this notice. No solicitation document exists at this time. All information received in response to this notice that is marked Proprietary will be handled accordingly. Responses may not include Classified material. Responses to this notice will not be returned. No reimbursement will be made for any costs to provide information in response to this announcement or any follow-up information requests. Information contained herein is based on the best information available at the time for publication, is subject to revision, and is not binding upon the Government.

Experimental Forward Operating Base (ExFOB) 2014 Submission Form Submission Instructions: Complete the ExFOB 2014 Submission Form and save as a Microsoft Word document. Send the.doc and a.jpg photo of your technology to energy@usmc.mil. The completed Submission Form must be received by midnight EST on 21 February 2014. PART A - Name and Contact Information 1. Technology Name: 2. Company Name: 3. Company Address: 4. POC Name: 5. POC E-mail: 6. POC Phone: 7. Company Website: PART B - Energy Harvesting Category Energy Harvesting from Marines on Patrol Energy Harvesting from Generators Other PART C - Technology Description 8. Describe your technology and how it can reduce Marine Corps battlefield energy, water, and battery requirements. 9. Provide a physical description of your technology (size, weight, cube).

10. Summarize the technical specifications of your technology (power, voltage, efficiency). 11. Indicate the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of your technology. Department of Defense TRL definitions are included below as reference. Note: You must have a working prototype. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12. Have you shown/discussed your technology with anyone in federal/state government or the military services? If yes, provide POC name/phone/e-mail. 13. Has your technology been tested in a military operational environment (training or deployment)? If yes, describe the nature of the test, date, location, military office(s) involved, and military POC name/phone/e-mail. 14. Do you foresee any issues integrating your technology into military platforms and/or an operational environment (i.e. extreme temperatures, water, sand etc.)?

15. Is your technology currently being used in the private sector? If yes, describe. 16. Summarize relevant test data for your technology, emphasizing projected fuel/water/battery reduction and/or efficiency improvement over existing USMC technology. DO NOT ATTACH COPIES OF TEST REPORTS. 17. Describe how you will demonstrate your technology at ExFOB 2014. A dynamic demonstration is required. Include information regarding space (sq. ft.) and equipment required. NOTE: The ExFOB location is remote and shore power may not be available. Generators may be provided for companies demonstrating generator waste heat recovery technologies. However, permanent modifications to Government Furnished Equipment WILL NOT be permitted. 18. Attach a.jpg photo of your technology. (CAD drawings and computer simulations are not sufficient).

Department of Defense Technology Readiness Levels, Defined* Technology Readiness Level Description 1. Basic principles observed and reported. Lowest level of technology readiness. Scientific research begins to be translated into applied research and development. Examples might include paper studies of a technology s basic properties. 2. Technology concept and/or application Invention begins. Once basic principles are formulated. observed, practical applications can be invented. Applications are speculative and there may be no proof or detailed analysis to support the assumptions. Examples are limited to analytic 3. Analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof of concept. 4. Component and/or breadboard validation in laboratory environment. 5. Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment. 6. System/subsystem model or prototype demonstration in a relevant environment. studies. Active research and development is initiated. This includes analytical studies and laboratory studies to physically validate analytical predictions of separate elements of the technology. Examples include components that are not yet integrated or representative. Basic technological components are integrated to establish that they will work together. This is relatively low fidelity compared to the eventual system. Examples include integration of ad hoc hardware in the laboratory. Fidelity of breadboard technology increases significantly. The basic technological components are integrated with reasonably realistic supporting elements so it can be tested in a simulated environment. Examples include high fidelity laboratory integration of components. Representative model or prototype system, which is well beyond that of TRL 5, is tested in a relevant environment. Represents a major step up in a technology s demonstrated readiness. Examples include testing a prototype in a highfidelity laboratory environment or in simulated operational environment. 7. System prototype demonstration in an Prototype near, or at, planned operational operational environment. system. Represents a major step up from TRL 6, requiring demonstration of an actual system prototype in an operational environment such as an aircraft, vehicle, or space. Examples include testing the prototype in a test bed aircraft. 8. Actual system completed and qualified Technology has been proven to work in its final

through test and demonstration. 9. Actual system proven through successful mission operations. form and under expected conditions. In almost all cases, this TRL represents the end of true system development. Examples include developmental test and evaluation of the system in its intended weapon system to determine if it meets design specifications. Actual application of the technology in its final form and under mission conditions, such as those encountered in operational test and evaluation. Examples include using the system under operational mission conditions. DEFINITIONS: BREADBOARD: Integrated components that provide a representation of a system/subsystem and which can be used to determine concept feasibility and to develop technical data. Typically configured for laboratory use to demonstrate the technical principles of immediate interest. May resemble final system/subsystem in function only. HIGH FIDELITY : Addresses form, fit and function. High-fidelity laboratory environment would involve testing with equipment that can simulate and validate all system specifications within a laboratory setting. LOW FIDELITY : A representative of the component or system that has limited ability to provide anything but first order information about the end product. Low-fidelity assessments are used to provide trend analysis. MODEL: A functional form of a system, generally reduced in scale, near or at operational specification. Models will be sufficiently hardened to allow demonstration of the technical and operational capabilities required of the final system. OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT: Environment that addresses all of the operational requirements and specifications required of the final system to include platform/packaging. PROTOTYPE: A physical or virtual model used to evaluate the technical or manufacturing feasibility or military utility of a particular technology or process, concept, end item or system. RELEVANT ENVIRONMENT: Testing environment that simulates the key aspects of the operational environment. SIMULATED OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL: Either 1) a real environment that can simulate all of the operational requirements and specifications required of the final system, or 2) a simulated environment that allows for testing of a virtual prototype; used in either case to determine whether a developmental system meets the operational requirements and specifications of the final system. *Source: DoD Deskbook 5000.2-R, Appendix 6, Technology Readiness Levels and Their Definitions.