Enclosed is the EMC test report for compliance testing of the Infinera, Cloud Xpress (CX-100E-1200F- C2/XTa33xx), tested to the requirements of:

MET Laboratories, Inc. Safety Certification - EMI - Telecom Environmental Simulation 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 PHONE (410) 354-3300 FAX (410) 354-3313 33439 WESTERN AVENUE UNION CITY, CALIFORNIA 94587 PHONE (510) 489-6300 FAX (510) 489-6372 3162 BELICK STREET SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA 95054 PHONE (408) 748-3585 FAX (510) 489-6372 13501 MCCALLEN PASS AUSTIN, TEXAS 78753 PHONE (512) 287-2500 FAX (512) 287-2513 April 6, 2017 Infinera 169 West Java Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Dear Wale Aderemi, Enclosed is the EMC test report for compliance testing of the Infinera, Cloud Xpress (CX-100E-1200F- C2/XTa33xx), tested to the requirements of: Emission Tests: EN 55032:2012/AC:2013; CISPR 32: 2012; Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013; FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014); Industry Canada ICES-003 Issue 6, January 2016; VCCI V-3/2015.04 and V-4/2012.04, A-0124 (for CE) & A-0125 (for RE); and ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) for a Class A Device Immunity Test: EN 55024: 2010; CISPR 24: 2010; and ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) Thank you for using the services of MET Laboratories, Inc. If you have any questions regarding these results or if MET can be of further service to you, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely yours, MET LABORATORIES, INC. Angelina Red Documentation Department Reference: (\Infinera\EMCU93869-Global) Certificates and reports shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of MET Laboratories, Inc. While use of the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) letters, the NVLAP Logo, or the A2LA logo in this report reflects MET accreditation under these programs, the report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or A2LA, or any agency of the Federal Government. This letter of transmittal is not a part of the attached report. The Nation s First Licensed Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory

MET Laboratories, Inc. Safety Certification - EMI - Telecom Environmental Simulation 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 PHONE (410) 354-3300 FAX (410) 354-3313 33439 WESTERN AVENUE UNION CITY, CALIFORNIA 94587 PHONE (510) 489-6300 FAX (510) 489-6372 3162 BELICK STREET SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA 95054 PHONE (408) 748-3585 FAX (510) 489-6372 13501 MCCALLEN PASS AUSTIN, TEXAS 78753 PHONE (512) 287-2500 FAX (512) 287-2513 for the Infinera Tested under EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014), Industry Canada ICES-003 Issue 6, January 2016, VCCI V-3/2015.04 and V-4/2012.04, A-0124 (for CE) & A-0125 (for RE), and ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) for a Class A Device and EN 55024: 2010, CISPR 24: 2010, and ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) MET Report: EMCU93869-Global April 6, 2017 Prepared for: Infinera 169 West Java Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Prepared by: MET Laboratories, Inc. 33439 Western Avenue Union City, CA 94587 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page i of vii

For the Infinera Tested under EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014), Industry Canada ICES-003 Issue 6, January 2016, VCCI V-3/2015.04 and V-4/2012.04, A-0124 (for CE) & A-0125 (for RE), and ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) for a Class A Device and EN 55024: 2010, CISPR 24: 2010, and ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) MET Report: EMCU93869-Global Joe Vang Project Engineer, Lab Angelina Red Documentation Department Engineering Statement: The measurements shown in this report were made in accordance with the procedures indicated, and the emissions from this equipment were found to be within the applicable limits. I assume full responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these measurements, and for the qualifications of all persons taking them. It is further stated that upon the basis of the measurements made, the equipment tested is capable of operation in accordance with the requirements per Test Summary (Section 1.0). Asad Bajwa Director, Lab MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page ii of vii

Report Status Sheet Report Status Revision Report Date Reason for Revision Ø April 6, 2017 Initial Issue. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page iii of vii

Table of Contents Table of Contents 1.0 Testing Summary... 1 1.1 Emissions Test Summary... 1 1.2 Immunity Test Summary... 3 2.0 Equipment Configuration... 6 2.1 Overview... 6 2.1.1 References for VCCI... 6 2.1.2 Test Site... 7 2.1.3 Measurement Uncertainty... 7 2.2 Detailed EUT Description and Test Setup... 8 2.2.1 Description of Test Sample... 8 2.2.2 Photograph(s) of Test Sample... 8 2.2.3 Block Diagram... 9 2.2.4 Equipment Configuration... 10 2.2.5 Support Equipment... 11 2.2.6 Ports and Cabling Information... 11 2.2.7 Mode of Operation & Method of Monitoring EUT Operation... 12 2.2.8 Overall Immunity Performance Criteria... 12 2.2.9 Modifications to EUT... 13 2.2.10 Test Software Used... 13 2.2.11 Disposition of EUT... 13 3.0 Emission Criteria... 14 3.1 Limits for Conducted Disturbance at (AC) Mains Terminals... 14 3.2 Limits for Conducted Disturbance at DC Power Port... 24 3.3 Limits for Conducted Disturbance at Telecommunication Ports... 30 3.4 Radiated Emission: Limits of Electromagnetic Radiation Disturbance... 36 3.5 Harmonic Current Emissions... 55 3.6 Voltage Fluctuations (Flicker)... 59 4.0 Immunity Criteria... 64 4.1 Electrostatic Discharge... 64 4.2 Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Field... 70 4.3 Electrical Fast Transient/Burst... 76 4.4 Surge... 84 4.5 Radio Frequency, Conducted Continuous... 92 4.6 Voltage Dips and Short Interruptions... 99 5.0 FCC Part 15 Subpart B Compliance Information... 104 5.1 Verification Information... 104 5.2 Label and User s Manual Information... 109 6.0 ICES-003 Procedural & Labeling Requirements... 111 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page iv of vii

List of Tables Table of Contents Table 1: Uncertainty Calculations Summary... 7 Table 2. Equipment Configuration... 10 Table 3. Support Equipment... 11 Table 4. Ports and Cabling Information... 11 Table 5. Conducted Emissions - AC Voltage (CE-V) limits Annex A of EN 55032... 14 Table 6. CE Voltage - (230 VAC, 50 Hz), Phase Line Test Results... 16 Table 7. CE Voltage - (230 VAC, 50 Hz), Neutral Line Test Results... 17 Table 8. CE AC Voltage - (120 VAC, 60 Hz), Phase Line Test Results... 18 Table 9. CE AC Voltage - (120 VAC, 60 Hz), Neutral Line Test Results... 19 Table 10. CE Voltage - (100 VAC, 50/60 Hz), Phase Line Test Results... 20 Table 11. CE Voltage - (110 VAC, 50/60 Hz), Neutral Line Test Results... 21 Table 12. CE Voltage Test Equipment List... 23 Table 13. Mains Terminal Disturbance Voltage limits Annex A of EN 55032... 24 Table 14. CE Voltage (-48 VDC), DC Power Test Results... 26 Table 15. CE Voltage (RTN), DC Power Test Results... 27 Table 16. CE Voltage DC Power Port Test Equipment List... 29 Table 17. Limits of Conducted Common Mode (Asymmetric Mode) Disturbance at Telecommunication Ports per Annex A of EN 55032 Class A... 30 Table 18. CE Telecom Ports (DCN 1000Mb) Test Results... 32 Table 19. CE Telecom Ports (NCT1 1000Mb) Test Results... 33 Table 20. CE Telecom Ports Test Equipment List... 35 Table 21. Electromagnetic Radiated Disturbance limits, Below 1 GHz... 37 Table 22. Electromagnetic Radiated Disturbance limits, Above 1 GHz... 37 Table 23. Radiated Emissions Limits calculated per FCC Part 15, 15.109 (a) (b) and ICES-003... 37 Table 24. RE AC Power- (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results... 41 Table 25. RE AC Power Peak - (1-6 GHz) Test Results... 42 Table 26. RE AC Power Average - (1-6 GHz) Test Results... 42 Table 27. RE DC Power- (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results... 43 Table 28. RE DC Power Peak - (1-6 GHz) Test Results... 44 Table 29. RE DC Power Average - (1-6 GHz) Test Results... 44 Table 30. RE AC Power - (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results... 45 Table 31. RE AC Power Peak - (1-18 GHz) Test Results... 46 Table 32. RE AC Power Peak - (18-40 GHz) Test Results... 47 Table 33. RE DC Power (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results... 48 Table 34. RE DC Power Average - (1-18 GHz) Test Results... 49 Table 35. RE DC Power Peak - (18-40 GHz) Test Results... 50 Table 36. RE Test Equipment List... 54 Table 37. Harmonic Current Emission Limits for Class A equipment per Section 7 of EN 61000-3-2... 55 Table 38. Harmonic Current Emissions Test Results... 56 Table 39. Harmonic Current Emissions Test Equipment List... 58 Table 40. VF (Flicker) Test Results... 61 Table 41. VF (Flicker) Test Equipment List... 63 Table 42. ESD Test Results... 65 Table 43. ESD Test Equipment List... 69 Table 44. RI Test Results... 72 Table 45. RI FOKI Test Results Update... 73 Table 46. RI EUT Clock Frequencies Test Results Update... 73 Table 47. RI Test Equipment List... 75 Table 48. EFT/B Test Results... 79 Table 49. EFT/B Test Equipment List... 83 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page v of vii

Table of Contents Table 50. Combination Wave Generator Test Parameters for Surge Immunity Testing... 86 Table 51. Surge Test Results... 88 Table 52. Surge Test Equipment List... 91 Table 53. CI Test Results... 94 Table 54. CI Test Equipment List... 98 Table 55. Voltage Dips and Short Interruptions Limits... 99 Table 56. Voltage Dips and Short Interruptions Limits... 100 Table 57. VDI Test Results... 101 Table 58. VDI Test Equipment List... 103 List of Figures Figure 1. Block Diagram of Test Configuration... 9 Figure 2. Test Circuit for EN 61000-3-3... 60 Figure 3. Fast Transient Test Waveform from EN 61000-4-4... 77 Figure 4. Surge Test Waveforms from EN 61000-4-5... 85 List of Photographs Photograph 1. Front of... 8 Photograph 2. Rear of... 8 Photograph 3. CE Voltage Test Setup... 22 Photograph 4. CE Voltage - DC Power Port Test Setup... 28 Photograph 5. CE Telecom Ports Test Setup... 34 Photograph 6. RE Test Setup... 51 Photograph 7. 1-18 GHz RE Test Setup... 52 Photograph 8. RE Test Setup... 53 Photograph 9. Harmonic Current Emissions Test Setup... 57 Photograph 10. VF (Flicker) Test Setup... 62 Photograph 11. ESD Test Points Front of EUT... 66 Photograph 12. ESD Test Points Rear of EUT... 66 Photograph 13. ESD Test Points Right of EUT... 67 Photograph 14. ESD Test Points Left of EUT... 67 Photograph 15. ESD Test Setup... 68 Photograph 16. RI Test Setup... 74 Photograph 17. EFT/B AC Power Test Setup... 80 Photograph 18. EFT/B DC Power Test Setup... 81 Photograph 19. EFT/B I/O Test Setup... 82 Photograph 20. AC Surge Test Setup... 89 Photograph 21. I/O Surge Test Setup... 90 Photograph 22. CI AC Power Test Setup... 95 Photograph 23. CI DC Power Test Setup... 96 Photograph 24. CI IO Test Setup... 97 Photograph 25. VDI Test Setup... 102 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page vi of vii

List of Terms and Abbreviations List of Terms and Abbreviations AC Alternating Current FOKI Frequency of Key Interest µf microfarad GRP Ground Reference Plane µh microhenry H Magnetic Field µs microseconds HCP Horizontal Coupling Plane ACF Antenna Correction Factor Hz Hertz AV Average IEC International Electrotechnical Commission Cal Calibration khz kilohertz CE Conducted Emissions kpa kilopascal CI Conducted Immunity kv kilovolt CISPR Comite International Special des Perturbations Radioelectriques (International Special Committee on Radio LISN Line Impedance Stabilization Network Interference) d Measurement Distance MHz Megahertz db Decibels MI Magnetic Immunity dbµa Decibels above one microamp PRF Pulse Repetition Frequency dbµa/m Decibels above one microamp per meter QP Quasi Peak dbµv Decibels above one microvolt RE Radiated Emissions dbµv/m Decibels above one microvolt per meter RF Radio Frequency DC Direct Current RI Radiated Immunity E Electric Field RMS Root-Mean-Square EFT/B Electrical Fast Transient/Burst V/m Volts per meter ESD Electrostatic Discharge VCP Vertical Coupling Plane EUT Equipment Under Test VDI Voltage Dips Interruptions f Frequency VF Voltage Fluctuations MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page vii of vii

Testing Summary 1.0 Testing Summary 1.1. Emissions Test Summary The emissions tests specified below were performed with the following results: Frequency Range 0.15 30 MHz (230 VAC, 50 Hz) 0.15 30 MHz (120 VAC, 60 Hz) 0.15 30 MHz (100 VAC, 50/60 Hz) Specification EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014), ICES-003 Conducted Emissions (Mains) Measurement (MHz) Margin (dbµv) 0.18-18.7 Class Compliance Compliant A 0.18-17.33 Compliant VCCI 0.175-17.93 Compliant Conducted Emissions (DC Power) (48 VDC) ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) 29.93-33.7 A Compliant 0.15 30 MHz (DCN 1000Mb) 0.15 30 MHz (NCT1 1000Mb) 30 MHz 1 GHz 1-40 GHz 1-6 GHz 30 MHz 1 GHz 1-40 GHz 1-6 GHz Conducted Emissions (Telecommunication Ports) EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, VCCI, ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014), ICES-003, VCCI ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014), ICES-003 EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, VCCI, ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09 EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014), ICES-003, VCCI ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014), ICES-003 EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, VCCI, ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09 Radiated Emissions (AC Power) 25.47-31.08 Compliant A 20.665-34.32 Compliant 789.56-7.646 Radiated Emissions (DC Power) Compliant A 25781.55-2.957 Compliant 1253.667-4.887 Compliant 287.12-4.815 Compliant A 25781.55-2.957 Compliant 1253.667-4.887 Compliant MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 1 of 111

Testing Summary Test Description Harmonic Current Emissions Voltage Fluctuations/Flicker Specification Harmonic and Flicker Worst Case Measurement Margin Compliance EN 61000-3-2: 2014 0.5096-1.7904 Compliant EN 61000-3-3: 2013 Plt: 0.07 Pst: 0.07 Dmax: 0 Dc: 0 D(t): 0 Plt: -0.58 Pst: -0.93 Dmax: -4 Dc: -3 D(t): -0.2 Compliant MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 2 of 111

Testing Summary 1.2. Immunity Test Summary The immunity tests specified below were performed with the following results: EN 55024: 2010, CISPR 24: 2010 & TEC India No: TEC/EMI/TEL-001/01/FEB-09 Port Test Description Specification Enclosure Signal and Telecommunication DC Power AC Power Electrostatic Discharge Radiated Electromagnetic Field Magnetic Immunity EFT/B Surge Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio-Frequency Fields EFT/B Surge Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio-Frequency Fields EFT/B Surge Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio-Frequency Fields Voltage Dips, Interruptions and Variations EN 61000-4-2: 2009 EN 61000-4-3: 2006 +A1:2008 +A2:2010 EN 61000-4-8: 2010 EN 61000-4-4: 2004 EN 61000-4-5: 2006 EN 61000-4-6: 2009 EN 61000-4-4: 2004 EN 61000-4-5: 2006 EN 61000-4-6: 2009 EN 61000-4-4: 2004 EN 61000-4-5: 2006 EN 61000-4-6: 2009 EN 61000-4-11: 2004 Test Level Required ±4 kv Contact ±8 kv Air 80-1000 MHz at 3 V/m 1 A/m Test Level Achieved ±4 kv Contact ±8 kv Air 80-1000 MHz at 10 V/m Performance Criteria Achieved A A Compliance Compliant Compliant Not Applicable The EUT does not contain any magnetic sensitive components. ±0.5 kv ±0.5 kv A Compliant ±1 kv 1.2/50ms 0.15 80 MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz Not Applicable The EUT does not have indoor cables. 0.15 80 MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz A Compliant ±0.5 kv ±1 kv A Compliant ±0.5 kv 1.2/50ms 0.15 80 MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz ±0.5 kv 1.2/50ms 0.15 80 MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz A A Compliant Compliant ±1 kv ±1 kv A Compliant ±2 kv (line to earth) ±1 kv (line to line) 1.2/50ms 0.15 80 MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz >95% Reduction, 0.5 Period 30% Reduction 25 Period >95%, Reduction 250 Period ±2 kv (line to earth) ±1 kv (line to line) 1.2/50ms 0.15 80 MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz >95% Reduction, 0.5 Period 30% Reduction 25 Period >95%, Reduction 250 Period A A A A A Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 3 of 111

Testing Summary Port Test Description Specification Enclosure Outdoor Signal Lines Indoor Signal Lines AC Power DC Power Electrostatic Discharge Radiated Electromagnetic Field EFT/B Surge Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio- Frequency Fields EFT/B Surge Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio- Frequency Fields EFT/B Surge Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio- Frequency Fields Voltage Dips, Interruptions and Variations EFT/B EN 61000-4-2: 2009 EN 61000-4-3: 2006 +A1:2008 +A2:2010 EN 61000-4-4: 2004+A1:2 010 EN 61000-4-5: 2006 EN 61000-4-6: 2009 EN 61000-4-4: 2004+A1:2 010 EN 61000-4-5: 2006 EN 61000-4-6: 2009 EN 61000-4-4: 2004+A1:2 010 EN 61000-4-5: 2006 EN 61000-4-6: 2009 EN 61000-4-11: 2004 EN 61000-4-4: 2004+A1:2 010 ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) TC Test Level Required ±4 kv Contact ±4 kv Air OTC Test Level Required ±6 kv Contact ±8 kv Air 80-2700 MHz at 3 V/m 800-2000 MHz, at 10 V/m ±0.5 kv 5/50 ms ±1 kv (lines to ground) 1.2/50 ms 0.15 80 MHz at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz ±0.5 kv 5/50 ms ±0.5 kv (lines to ground) 1.2/50 ms 0.15 80 MHz at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz ±1 kv (line to ground) ±0.5 kv (line to line) 1.2/50 ms ±1 kv 5/50 ms ±2 kv (line to ground) ±1 kv (line to line) 1.2/50 ms 0.15 80 MHz at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz Not Applicable ±0.5 kv 5/50 ms 100% Reduction, 0.5 Period 100%, Reduction 1 Period 30% Reduction 25 Period 100%, Reduction 250 Period ±1 kv 5/50 ms Test Level Achieved ±4 kv Contact ±4 kv Air 80-2700 MHz at 10 V/m 800-2000 MHz, at 10 V/m ±0.5 kv 5/50 ms ±1 kv (line to ground) 1.2/50 ms 0.15 80 MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz ±0.5 kv 5/50 ms ±0.5 kv (line to ground) 1.2/50 ms 0.15 80 MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz ±1 kv 5/50 ms ±2 kv (line to ground) ±1 kv (line to line) 1.2/50 ms 0.15 80 MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz 100% Reduction, 0.5 Period 100%, Reduction 1 Period 30% Reduction 25 Period 100%, Reduction 250 Period ±1 kv 5/50 ms Performance Criteria Achieved A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Compliance Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 4 of 111

Testing Summary Port Test Description Specification Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio- Frequency Fields TC = Telecom Center OTC = Other Than Telecom Center EN 61000-4-6: 2009 ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) TC Test Level Required OTC Test Level Required 0.15 80 MHz at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz Test Level Achieved 0.15 80 MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz Performance Criteria Achieved A Compliance Compliant MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 5 of 111

Equipment Configuration 2.0 Equipment Configuration 2.1. Overview MET Laboratories, Inc. was contracted by Infinera to perform testing on the Cloud Xpress (CX-100E- 1200F-C2/XTa33xx), under Infinera, purchase order number 300026238. This document describes the test setups, test methods, required test equipment, and the test limit criteria used to perform compliance testing of the Infinera,. In accordance with 2.955(a) (3), the following data is presented in support of the verification of the Infinera,. Infinera should retain a copy of this document which should be kept on file for at least two years after the manufacturing of the Cloud Xpress (CX-100E- 1200F-C2/XTa33xx) has been permanently discontinued, as per 2.955(b). The results obtained relate only to the item(s) tested. Model(s) Tested: Model(s) Covered: Primary Power as Tested: Equipment Emissions Class: Highest frequency generated or used by the EUT: Evaluated by: 100~240 V, 48 Vdc A 100 GHz Joe Vang Report Date: April 6, 2017 2.1.1. References for VCCI VCCI V-3/2015.04 VCCI V-4/2012.04 A-0124 (for CE) & A-0125 (for RE) Technical Requirements Instructions for Test Conditions for Equipment under Test Laboratory Registration Number MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 6 of 111

Equipment Configuration 2.1.2. Test Site All testing was performed at MET Laboratories, Inc., 33439 Western Ave., Union City, CA 94587. All equipment used in making physical determinations is accurate and bears recent traceability to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. MET Laboratories is an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited site by A2LA, (California #0591.02) Radiated Emissions measurements were performed in a semi-anechoic chamber. In accordance with 2.948(a)(3), a complete site description is contained at MET Laboratories. 2.1.3. Measurement Uncertainty Test Method Typical Expanded Uncertainty (db) K Confidence Level Radiated Emissions, (30 MHz 1 GHz) ±3.54 2 95% Radiated Emissions, (1-6 GHz) ±4.09 2 95% Conducted Emission ±2.93 2 95% CEV Telecom Port ±2.73 2 95% Table 1: Uncertainty Calculations Summary MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 7 of 111

Equipment Configuration 2.2. Detailed EUT Description and Test Setup 2.2.1. Description of Test Sample The, Equipment Under Test (EUT), is a purposebuilt, optimized platform family for point-to-point hyper-scale bandwidth interconnect application across regional, metro and campus environments including data centers. It leverages the opic-500 optical engine, Infinera s unique metro-optimized photonic integrated circuit, to deliver DWDM datacenter interconnect services up to 500 gigabits per second (Gb/s) in a compact two rack unit chassis. 2.2.2. Photograph(s) of Test Sample Photograph 1. Front of Photograph 2. Rear of MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 8 of 111

Equipment Configuration 2.2.3. Block Diagram Figure 1. Block Diagram of Test Configuration MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 9 of 111

Equipment Configuration 2.2.4. Equipment Configuration The EUT was setup as outlined in Figure 1. All equipment incorporated as part of the EUT is included in the following list. Slot # Name / Description Model Number Part Number * Serial Number CX-1200F CX-100E-1200F- C2/XTa33xx 800-1122-201 MA9017075345 Control Module XMM2 132-0367-002 MA4717070010 AC Power Supply XP2-PEM-AC 132-0351-001 GA1649RE002A AC Power Supply XP2-PEM-AC 132-0351-001 GA1504R1008A 1 QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR4 130-0334-001 INFBG1500714 2 QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR4 130-0334-001 INFBF1500597 3 QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR4 130-0334-001 INFBF1500539 4 QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR4 130-0334-001 INFBH1500792 5 QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR4 130-0334-001 INFBF1500617 6 QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR4 130-0334-001 INFBF1500503 7 QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR4 130-0334-001 INFBG1500711 8 QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR4 130-0334-001 INFBF1500598 9 QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR4 130-0334-001 INFBF1500536 10 QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR4 130-0334-001 INFBH1500790 11 QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR4 130-0334-001 INFBF1500619 12 QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR4 130-0334-001 INFBF1500501 DC Power Supply XP2-PEM-DC 132-0352-001 W21624RE0014 DC Power Supply XP2-PEM-DC 132-0352-001 W21624RE0029 Alternate Modules using the same hardware Variants Description x=blank or B (represents instant bandwidth); y=blank, O (represents Facebook) CX-100E-1200Fx-y-Cz or FX (represents general availability); z= 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 13 or 14 and represents reach a=s (represents submarine application)or blank xx=03, 06, 09, 12, 18, 24 and represents the number of 100GE clients possible; b=n, B or P and represents XTa33xx-Yb-EmCnp instant bandwidth; m=b, Q, E, S, Z and represents modulation type; n=2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 13 or 14 and represents reach; p=a2+, D2+ or blank and represents the kit type AC/DC QSFP28 used in EUT TOM-100G-Q-LR4 TOM-100G-Q-CLR4 TOM-100G-Q-CWDM4 TOM-100G-LR4 TOM-100G-SR10 TOM-100GMR-LR4 *Serial Numbers are optional only if production cards for the EUT are to be manufactured at the same manufacturing facility. If cards are to be produced at multiple manufacturing facilities, then please provide the serial numbers. Table 2. Equipment Configuration MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 10 of 111

Equipment Configuration 2.2.5. Support Equipment Support equipment necessary for the operation and testing of the EUT is included in the following list. Name / Description Manufacturer Model Number * Customer Supplied Calibration Data Optical Network Tester JDSU ONT-603 Not Required Laptop Lenovo T60 Not Required Table 3. Support Equipment * All customer supplied support equipment will include the equipments calibration data. This column will be marked as either not applicable, not available, or will contain the calibration date supplied by the customer. 2.2.6. Ports and Cabling Information Port name on EUT Cable & Connector Description or reason for no cable Qty Length as tested (m) Max Length (m) Shielded (Y/N) Termination Box ID & Port Name TOM 1 MPO 1 15 100 N Tester Line In & Out LC 1 0.1 100 N Loopback Serial RJ45 1 15 100 N Laptop DCN RJ45 1 15 100 N Laptop NCT1 & NCT2 RJ45 1 15 100 N Unterminated Table 4. Ports and Cabling Information MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 11 of 111

Equipment Configuration 2.2.7. Mode of Operation & Method of Monitoring EUT Operation The EUT was operated in the following manner: The EUT port 1was connected to ONT-603 Optical Network Tester with MPO cable and the signal was running between the tester and the EUT. Performance of the EUT was monitored in the following manner: The Cloud Xpress was monitored through ONT-603 Optical Network Tester for signal degradation and Bit Error Rates. 2.2.8. Overall Immunity Performance Criteria In accordance with EN 55024, the EUT was evaluated according to the following performance criteria where specified: Performance Criterion A: The equipment shall continue to operate as intended without operator intervention. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer when the equipment is used as intended. The performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of performance. If the minimum performance level or the permissible performance loss is not specified by the manufacturer, then either of these may be derived from the product description and documentation, and by what the user may reasonably expect from the equipment if used as intended. Performance Criterion B: After the test, the equipment shall continue to operate as intended without operator intervention. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed, after the application of the phenomena below a performance level specified by the manufacturer, when the equipment is used as intended. The performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of performance. During the test, degradation of performance is allowed. However, no change of operating state or stored data is allowed to persist after the test. If the minimum performance level (or the permissible performance loss) is not specified by the manufacturer, then either of these may be derived from the product description and documentation, and by what the user may reasonably expect from the equipment if used as intended. Performance Criterion C: Loss of function is allowed, provided the function is self-recoverable, or can be restored by the operation of the controls by the user in accordance with the manufacturer s instructions. Functions, and/or information stored in non-volatile memory, or protected by a battery backup, shall not be lost. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 12 of 111

Equipment Configuration General Performance Criteria for ETSI EN 300 386 The general performance criteria apply for those ports for which no specific performance criteria are defined (e.g. auxiliary ports) in the present document. Performance Criterion A: The apparatus shall continue to operate as intended. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer when the apparatus is used as intended. In some cases the performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of performance. If the minimum performance level or the permissible performance loss is not specified by the manufacturer, then either of these may be deduced from the product description and documentation and what the user may reasonably expect from the apparatus if used as intended. Performance Criterion B: The apparatus shall continue to operate as intended after the test. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer, when the apparatus is used as intended. In some cases the performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of performance. During the exposure to an electromagnetic phenomenon, degradation of performance is, however, allowed. No change of actual operating state or stored data is allowed. If the minimum performance level or the permissible performance loss is not specified by the manufacturer, then either of these may be deduced from the product description and documentation and what the user may reasonably expect from the apparatus if used as intended. Performance Criterion C: Temporary loss of function is allowed, provided the function is self-recoverable or can be restored by the operation of the controls, or, in the case of switching equipment, by normal subsequent use. 2.2.9. Modifications to EUT No modifications were made to the EUT. 2.2.10. Test Software Used MET Labs uses software to gather information from test instrumentation. For Conducted Emissions, the current version is: PMM Emissions Suite Rev 2.04 and Jamila CE Rev 5.07. For Radiated Emissions testing, the current version is: Jamila UC 2.011. 2.2.11. Disposition of EUT The test sample including all support equipment (if any), submitted to the Electro-Magnetic Compatibility Lab for testing was returned to Infinera upon completion of testing. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 13 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.0 Emission Criteria 3.1. Limits for Conducted Disturbance at (AC) Mains Terminals 3.1.1. Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures 3.1.1.1. Test Method per EN 55032, CISPR 32 Electromagnetic compatibility of multimedia equipment Emission requirements The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, Annex A European CISPR 32: 2012, Annex A International AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, Annex A Australia / New Zealand FCC Part 15 Subpart B, Section 15.107(a) (b) (per ANSI C63.4: 2014) United States ICES-003 Issue 6, January 2016, per Clause 5.1 CAN/CSA-CISPR 22-10 Canada VCCI V-3/2015.04 and V-4/2012.04, Clause 4.1 Japan ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) Clause 6.1, per EN 55032 European 3.1.1.2. Test Requirements The EUT shall meet the Class A limits shown in Table 5: Frequency Range Class A Limits db(µv) Class B Limits db(µv) (MHz) Quasi-Peak Average Quasi- Peak Average 0.15-0.5 79 66 66 to 56 56 to 46 0.5-5 73 60 56 46 5-30 73 60 60 50 Note 1 The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. Note 2 The limit decreases linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 MHz to 0.5 MHz. Table 5. Conducted Emissions - AC Voltage (CE-V) limits Annex A of EN 55032 Sample Calculation: MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 14 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.1.1.3. Test Procedure The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack located in a semi-anechoic. The method of testing, test conditions, and test procedures of CISPR 32 were used. The EUT was powered through a 50Ω/50μH LISN. An EMI receiver, connected to the measurement port of the LISN, scanned the frequency range from 150 khz to 30 MHz in order to find the peak conducted emissions. All peak emissions within 6 db of the limit were remeasured using a quasi-peak and/or average detector as appropriate. 3.1.2. Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List 3.1.2.1. Test Results The EUT was compliant with the Class A requirement(s) of this section. Measured emissions were below applicable limits. Environmental Conditions for Conducted Emissions (AC) Ambient Temperature: 24 C Relative Humidity: 40% Atmospheric Pressure: 100 kpa Test Engineer(s): Joe Vang Test Date(s): 03/17/2017 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 15 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.1.2.2. Test Data Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results 0.165 52.64 79-26.36 Pass 39.65 66-26.35 Pass 0.18 52.6 79-26.4 Pass 47.3 66-18.7 Pass 0.195 45.15 79-33.85 Pass 38.5 66-27.5 Pass 0.205 32.4 79-46.6 Pass 18.15 66-47.85 Pass 0.25 32.4 79-46.6 Pass 17.9 66-48.1 Pass 0.28 27.7 79-51.3 Pass 17.1 66-48.9 Pass Table 6. CE Voltage - (230 VAC, 50 Hz), Phase Line Test Results Plot 1. CE Voltage, Phase Line Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 16 of 111

Emissions Criteria Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results 0.155 42.82 79-36.18 Pass 30.68 66-35.32 Pass 0.18 45.58 79-33.42 Pass 40.33 66-25.67 Pass 0.195 44.9 79-34.1 Pass 38.7 66-27.3 Pass 0.21 30.98 79-48.02 Pass 16.62 66-49.38 Pass 0.26 34.51 79-44.49 Pass 28.28 66-37.72 Pass 0.32 30.61 79-48.39 Pass 26.15 66-39.85 Pass Table 7. CE Voltage - (230 VAC, 50 Hz), Neutral Line Test Results Plot 2. CE Voltage, Neutral Line Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 17 of 111

Emissions Criteria Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results 0.18 53.23 79-25.77 Pass 48.67 66-17.33 Pass 0.255 37.51 79-41.49 Pass 30.72 66-35.28 Pass 0.535 49.43 73-23.57 Pass 35.76 60-24.24 Pass 0.895 49.5 73-23.5 Pass 32.5 60-27.5 Pass 1.245 49.17 73-23.83 Pass 30.81 60-29.19 Pass 1.61 48.4 73-24.6 Pass 29.74 60-30.26 Pass Table 8. CE AC Voltage - (120 VAC, 60 Hz), Phase Line Test Results Plot 3. CE Voltage, Phase Line Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 18 of 111

Emissions Criteria Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results 0.16 53.2 79-25.8 Pass 29.6 66-36.4 Pass 0.175 47.42 79-31.58 Pass 43.34 66-22.66 Pass 0.195 40.74 79-38.26 Pass 36.8 66-29.2 Pass 3.255 50.32 73-22.68 Pass 30.8 60-29.2 Pass 3.63 48.6 73-24.4 Pass 27.6 60-32.4 Pass 3.925 50.2 73-22.8 Pass 32.5 60-27.5 Pass Table 9. CE AC Voltage - (120 VAC, 60 Hz), Neutral Line Test Results Plot 4. CE Voltage, Neutral Line Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 19 of 111

Emissions Criteria Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results 0.15 45.34 79-33.66 Pass 32.13 66-33.87 Pass 0.165 53.25 79-25.75 Pass 31.3 66-34.7 Pass 0.175 52.3 79-26.7 Pass 48.07 66-17.93 Pass 0.195 40.35 79-38.65 Pass 36.5 66-29.5 Pass 0.225 22.98 79-56.02 Pass 14.95 66-51.05 Pass 4.05 51.9 73-21.1 Pass 31.87 60-28.13 Pass Table 10. CE Voltage - (100 VAC, 50/60 Hz), Phase Line Test Results Plot 5. CE Voltage, Phase Line Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 20 of 111

Emissions Criteria Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results 0.17 42.87 79-36.13 Pass 24.01 66-41.99 Pass 3.375 53.28 73-19.72 Pass 35.6 60-24.4 Pass 3.725 52.2 73-20.8 Pass 33.9 60-26.1 Pass 4.05 55.04 73-17.96 Pass 36.8 60-23.2 Pass 4.39 53.27 73-19.73 Pass 32.47 60-27.53 Pass 4.81 52.1 73-20.9 Pass 32.5 60-27.5 Pass Table 11. CE Voltage - (110 VAC, 50/60 Hz), Neutral Line Test Results Plot 6. CE Voltage, Neutral Line Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 21 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.1.2.3. Test Setup Photograph Photograph 3. CE Voltage Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 22 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.1.2.4. Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Conducted Disturbance at (AC) Mains Terminals Test Date(s): 03/03/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Cal Due Date Date 1S2676 PMM Receiver Narda 9010 11/11/2016 11/11/2017 1U0336 LISN Com Power LI-215A 05/31/2016 05/31/2017 1U0034 Shield Room # 3 Universal Shielding EMI Shielded Corp. Enclosure Not Required Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 12. CE Voltage Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 23 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.2. Limits for Conducted Disturbance at DC Power Port 3.2.1. Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures 3.2.1.1. Test Method per EN 55032, CISPR 32 Electromagnetic compatibility of multimedia equipment Emission requirements The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) Clause 6.2, per EN 55032 European 3.2.1.2. Test Requirements The EUT shall meet the Class A limits shown in Table 13: Frequency Range Class A Limits db(µv) Class B Limits db(µv) (MHz) Quasi-Peak Average Quasi- Peak Average 0.15-0.5 79 66 66 to 56 56 to 46 0.5-5 73 60 56 46 5-30 73 60 60 50 Note: The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. The limits decrease linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15 MHz to 0.5 MHz. Table 13. Mains Terminal Disturbance Voltage limits Annex A of EN 55032 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 24 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.2.1.3. Test Procedure The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack located in a semi-anechoic chamber. The method of testing, test conditions, and test procedures of CISPR 32 were used. The EUT was powered through a 50Ω/50μH LISN. An EMI receiver, connected to the measurement port of the LISN, scanned the frequency range from 150 khz to 30 MHz in order to find the peak conducted emissions. All peak emissions within 6 db of the limit were remeasured using a quasi-peak and/or average detector as appropriate. 3.2.2. Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List 3.2.2.1. Test Result The EUT was compliant with the Class A requirement(s) of this section. Measured emissions were below applicable limits. Environmental Conditions for Conducted Emissions (DC) Ambient Temperature: 24 C Relative Humidity: 40% Atmospheric Pressure: 100 kpa Test Engineer(s): Joe Vang Test Date(s): 03/17/2017 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 25 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.2.2.2. Test Data Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results 0.22 36.9 79-42.1 Pass 22.6 66-43.4 Pass 0.23 37.6 79-41.4 Pass 30.9 66-35.1 Pass 0.34 36.2 79-42.8 Pass 30.13 66-35.87 Pass 2.645 31.34 73-41.66 Pass 15.7 60-44.3 Pass 6.2 32.4 73-40.6 Pass 17.4 60-42.6 Pass 17.08 31.23 73-41.77 Pass 25.4 60-34.6 Pass Table 14. CE Voltage (-48 VDC), DC Power Test Results Plot 7. CE Voltage (-48 VDC), DC Power Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 26 of 111

Emissions Criteria Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results 0.22 31.32 79-47.68 Pass 21.79 66-44.21 Pass 0.33 30.89 79-48.11 Pass 20.83 66-45.17 Pass 0.35 32.6 79-46.4 Pass 25.56 66-40.44 Pass 14.08 28.25 73-44.75 Pass 22.88 60-37.12 Pass 16.29 31.6 73-41.4 Pass 25.56 60-34.44 Pass 29.93 27.92 73-45.08 Pass 26.3 60-33.7 Pass Table 15. CE Voltage (RTN), DC Power Test Results Plot 8. CE Voltage (RTN), DC Power Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 27 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.2.2.3. Test Setup Photograph Photograph 4. CE Voltage - DC Power Port Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 28 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.2.2.4. Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Conducted Disturbance at DC Power Port Test Date(s): 03/17/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1S3988 LISN COM Power LI -1100 07/15/2016 07/15/2017 1S3989 LISN COM Power LI -1100 07/15/2016 07/15/2017 1S2676 PMM Receiver Narda 9010 11/11/2016 11/11/2017 1U0034 Shield Room # 3 Universal Shielding Corp. Table 16. CE Voltage DC Power Port Test Equipment List EMI Shielded Enclosure Not Required MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 29 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.3. Limits for Conducted Disturbance at Telecommunication Ports 3.3.1. Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures 3.3.1.1. Test Method per EN 55032, CISPR 32 Electromagnetic compatibility of multimedia equipment Emission requirements The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, Annex A European CISPR 32: 2012, Annex A International AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, Annex A Australia / New Zealand VCCI V-3/2015.04 and V-4/2012.04, Clause 4.2 Japan ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09), Clause 6.3 per EN 55032 European 3.3.1.2. Test Requirements The EUT shall meet the Conducted Common Mode Class A limits shown in Table 17: Frequency Range Voltage Limits db(µv) Current Limits db(µa) (MHz) Quasi-Peak Average Quasi- Peak Average 0.15-0.5 97 to 87 84 to 74 53 to 43 40 to 30 0.5-30 87 74 43 30 Note: The limits decrease linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15 MHz to 0.5 MHz. The current and voltage disturbnace limits are derived for use with an ISN which presents a common mode (asymetric mode) impedance of 150 W to the telecommunication port under test (conversion factor is 20 Log 10 150/1 = 44 db). Table 17. Limits of Conducted Common Mode (Asymmetric Mode) Disturbance at Telecommunication Ports per Annex A of EN 55032 Class A MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 30 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.3.1.3. Test Procedure The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack located in a shielded enclosure. The measurements were performed using normal operation of the equipment. The method of testing, test conditions, and test procedures of Clause 9 of EN 55032 were used. The EMI receiver scanned the frequency range from 150 khz to 30 MHz. The measurements were performed over the frequency range of 0.15 MHz to 30 MHz using an ISN or Current Probe and Capacitive Voltage Probe as the input transducer to an EMC field intensity meter. For shielded signal lines, the insulation was broken 30 cm to 80 cm away from the EUT to reach the outside metallic surface of the shield to connect a 150 Ω resistor from the outside surface of the shield to ground. Measurements were taken with a Current Probe placed 10 cm away from the 150 Ω resistor towards the EUT. 3.3.2. Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List 3.3.2.1. Test Result The EUT was compliant with the Class A requirement(s) of this section. Measured emissions were below applicable limits. Environmental Conditions for Conducted Emissions (Telecom Ports) Ambient Temperature: 24 C Relative Humidity: 40% Atmospheric Pressure: 100 kpa Test Engineer(s): Joe Vang Test Date(s): 03/17/2017 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 31 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.3.2.2. Test Data Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results 5.215 41.34 87-45.66 Pass 31.87 74-42.13 Pass 5.51 43.47 87-43.53 Pass 33.88 74-40.12 Pass 8.74 40.12 87-46.88 Pass 34.28 74-39.72 Pass 11.82 43.82 87-43.18 Pass 37.97 74-36.03 Pass 14.15 45.48 87-41.52 Pass 39.6 74-34.4 Pass 25.47 48.64 87-38.36 Pass 42.92 74-31.08 Pass Table 18. CE Telecom Ports (DCN 1000Mb) Test Results Plot 9. CE Telecom Ports (DCN 1000Mb) Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 32 of 111

Emissions Criteria Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results 3.96 36.8 87-50.2 Pass 29.55 74-44.45 Pass 5.195 38.13 87-48.87 Pass 31.84 74-42.16 Pass 5.5 39.65 87-47.35 Pass 32.9 74-41.1 Pass 8.275 40.58 87-46.42 Pass 34.64 74-39.36 Pass 10.925 42.65 87-44.35 Pass 36.83 74-37.17 Pass 20.665 45.4 87-41.6 Pass 39.68 74-34.32 Pass Table 19. CE Telecom Ports (NCT1 1000Mb) Test Results Plot 10. CE Telecom Ports (NCT1 1000Mb) Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 33 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.3.2.3. Test Setup Photograph Photograph 5. CE Telecom Ports Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 34 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.3.2.4. Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Conducted Disturbance at Telecommunication Ports Test Date(s): 03/17/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1S3988 LISN COM Power LI -1100 07/15/2016 07/15/2017 1S3989 LISN COM Power LI -1100 07/15/2016 07/15/2017 1S2676 PMM Receiver Narda 9010 11/11/2016 11/11/2017 1U0336 LISN Com Power LI-215A 05/31/2016 05/31/2017 1U0034 Shield Room # 3 1U0255 Impedance Stabilization Network Universal Shielding Corp. Table 20. CE Telecom Ports Test Equipment List EMI Shielded Enclosure Not Required Not Required TESEQ GMBH ISN T8 05/26/2016 05/26/2017 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 35 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.4. Radiated Emission: Limits of Electromagnetic Radiation Disturbance 3.4.1. Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures 3.4.1.1. Test Method EN 55032, CISPR 32 Electromagnetic compatibility of multimedia equipment Emission requirements FCC Part 15 Section 15.109(a) (b) (per ANSI C63.4: 2014) The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Applicability Standard Region 30-1000 MHz Semi-anechoic test environment > 1 GHz Free-Space test environment EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, Annex A European Yes Yes CISPR 32: 2012, Annex A International Yes Yes AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, Annex A Australia / New Zealand Yes Yes FCC Part 15 Subpart B, Section 15.109(a) (b) (per ANSI C63.4: 2014) United States Yes Yes ICES-003 Issue 6, January 2016, CAN/CSA-CISPR 22-10 Canada Yes Yes VCCI V-3/2015.04 and V-4/2012.04, Section 4.3 Japan Yes Yes ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09) Clause 7.1.1, per EN 55032 European Yes Yes MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 36 of 111

Emissions Criteria Frequency Band (MHz) 3.4.1.2. Test Requirements For radiated emission, the EUT shall meet the Class A radiated emission limits shown in Table 21, Table 22, and Table 23. 3 m measurement distance db(μv/m) Class A Quasi-Peak limits 10 m measurement distance db(μv/m) 3 m measurement distance db(μv/m) Class B Quasi-Peak limits 10 m measurement distance db(μv/m) 30 to 230 50 1 50.5 2 40 40 1 40.5 2 30 230 to 1000 57 1 57.5 2 47 47 1 47.5 2 37 1 VCCI Limits 2 TEC India Limits Table 21. Electromagnetic Radiated Disturbance limits, Below 1 GHz Frequency (GHz) Average limits 3 m measurement distance db(μv/m) Class A Peak limits 3 m measurement distance db(μv/m) Average limits 3 m measurement distance db(μv/m) Class B Peak limits 3 m measurement distance db(μv/m) 1 to 3 56 76 50 70 3 to 6 60 80 54 74 Table 22. Electromagnetic Radiated Disturbance limits, Above 1 GHz Frequency (MHz) 15.109 (b), Class A Limit db(μv/m) @ 10m Field Strength db(μv/m) 15.109 (a),class B Limit db(μv/m) @ 3m 30 88 39.00 40.00 88 216 43.50 43.50 216 230 46.40 46.00 230 960 46.40 46.00 960 1000 49.50 54.00 Above 1 GHz 1000 3000 49.50 54.00 3000 6000 49.50 54.00 6000 40000 49.50 54.00 If the highest frequency generated or used in the device or on which the device operates or tunes is: less than 108 MHz, the upper frequency of measurement range is 1000 MHz between 108 MHz 500 MHz, the upper frequency of measurement range in 2000 MHz between 500 1000 MHz, the upper frequency of measurement range is 5000 MHz above 1000 MHz, the upper frequency of measurement range is the 5 th harmonic of the highest frequency or 40 GHz, whichever is lower Table 23. Radiated Emissions Limits calculated per FCC Part 15, 15.109 (a) (b) and ICES-003 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 37 of 111

Emissions Criteria Sample Calculation for Distance Correction factor (DCF) measurement: Sample formula for calculating the Corrected Data for the Radiated Emissions Measurements: Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) (+) Pre Amp Gain (db)(-) CBL (db) (+) DCF (db) (+) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv/m) Limit (dbuv/m) Margin (db) 249.99 V 359.9 240.7 55.46 11.4 28.335 0 0 38.525 47-8.475 Corrected Amplitude (dbµv/m) = Uncorrected Amplitude (dbµv) +ACF (db) - Preamp Gain (db) + CBL (db) +DCF (db) ** = 55.46 + 11.4-28.355 + 0 + 0 = 38.525 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 38 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.4.1.3. Test Procedure The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack located inside a semi-anechoic chamber. Various antennas were placed near the EUT and measurements were taken of the field strengths and frequencies. For final radiated measurements, the EUT was placed in semianechoic chamber, and located 3 m away from an adjustable antenna mast. For pre-scanning, the spectrum analyzer scanned the frequency range from 30 MHz to 1 GHz to obtain an emission profile of the EUT. For each point of measurement, the turntable was rotated, and the antenna height was varied between 1 m and 4 m, in order to find the maximum radiated emissions. Measurements above 30 MHz were taken using this technique with the antenna in two polarizations: horizontal and vertical. Unless otherwise specified, measurements were made using a peak detector with a 120 khz bandwidth (30 MHz 1 GHz) and 1 MHz bandwidth (1-6 GHz). For emission between 1 GHz and 18 GHz, a double ridged guide horn was located 3 m from the EUT on an adjustable mast. A pre-scan was performed and used to find prominent radiated emissions. The pre-scan method includes investigation of the cone(s) of radiation output from the EUT using a boresighting antenna or with manual investigation by hand. For final emissions measurements at each frequency of interest, the EUT was rotated and the antenna height was varied depending on the geometry of the EUT and previously investigated cone(s) of radiation. In order to ensure maximized emissions, the horn antenna was positioned both vertically and horizontally. Measurements in both horizontal and vertical polarities were made and the data was recorded. Unless otherwise specified, measurements were made using an average detector with a 1 MHz resolution bandwidth. For emission between 18 GHz and 40 GHz, a horn antenna was located 3 m from the EUT on an adjustable mast for class A device and 1m distance for class B device. A prescan was performed and used to find prominent radiated emissions. The pre-scan method includes investigation of the cone(s) of radiation output from the EUT using a boresighting antenna or with manual investigation by hand. For final emissions measurements at each frequency of interest, the EUT was rotated and the antenna height was varied depending on the geometry of the EUT and previously investigated cone(s) of radiation. In order to ensure maximized emissions, the horn antenna was positioned both vertically and horizontally. Measurements in both horizontal and vertical polarities were made and the data was recorded. Unless otherwise specified, measurements were made using an average detector with a 1 MHz resolution bandwidth. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 39 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.4.2. Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List 3.4.2.1. Test Result The EUT was compliant with the Class A requirement(s) of this section. Measured emissions were below applicable limits. Environmental Conditions for Radiated Emission Ambient Temperature: 26.9 C Relative Humidity: 33% Atmospheric Pressure: 101.6 kpa Test Engineer(s): Bao Nguyen Test Date(s): 03/03/2017 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 40 of 111

Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) 3.4.2.2. Test Data Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) 287.09 V 146.4 400 48.76 13.384 28.733 0 0 33.411 47-13.589 287.09 H 21.6 335.5 53.96 13.358 28.733 0 0 38.585 47-8.415 789.56 H 35.3 113.4 44.74 21.1 27.086 0 0 38.754 47-8.246 789.56 V 184.5 199.3 44.11 21.3 27.086 0 0 38.324 47-8.676 861.32 V 185.5 196.9 41.15 22.1 26.472 0 0 36.778 47-10.222 861.32 H 36.4 100.3 41.77 22 26.472 0 0 37.298 47-9.702 Table 24. RE AC Power- (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results Plot 11. RE AC Power - (30 MHz 1 GHz), Plot = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 41 of 111

Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) 1253.667 V 221.1 137.7 64.05 25.147 37.224 0 0 51.973 76-24.027 1253.55 H 124 100 52.48 25.147 37.224 0 0 40.403 76-35.597 1004.759 V 17.6 132.3 59.59 24.863 37.132 0 0 47.321 76-28.679 1004.82 H 16.5 100 54.21 24.863 37.132 0 0 41.941 76-34.059 1186.25 V 224.5 100 56.07 24.914 37.199 0 0 43.785 76-32.215 1186.25 H 341.6 100 54.83 24.914 37.199 0 0 42.545 76-33.455 Table 25. RE AC Power Peak - (1-6 GHz) Test Results Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) 1004.759 V 17.6 132.3 57.24 24.863 37.132 0 0 44.971 56-11.029 1004.82 H 16.5 100 54.21 24.863 37.132 0 0 41.941 56-14.059 1186.25 V 224.5 100 54.94 24.914 37.199 0 0 42.655 56-13.345 1186.25 H 341.6 100 54.48 24.914 37.199 0 0 42.195 56-13.805 1253.55 H 124 100 50.39 25.147 37.224 0 0 38.313 56-17.687 1253.667 V 221.1 137.7 63.2 25.147 37.224 0 0 51.123 56-4.877 Table 26. RE AC Power Average - (1-6 GHz) Test Results = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization Plot 12. RE AC Power (1-6 GHz), Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 42 of 111

Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) 287.12 V 116.5 100 53.61 13.385 28.733 0 0 38.262 47-8.738 287.12 H 250.1 254.1 56.96 13.358 28.733 0 0 41.585 47-5.415 742.4 H 116.6 131.8 42.86 20.6 27.286 0 0 36.174 47-10.826 742.4 V 156.9 100 36.4 20.848 27.286 0 0 29.962 47-17.038 875.04 V 179.5 157.8 39.93 22.001 26.425 0 0 35.506 47-11.494 875.04 H 292 282.9 39.18 22.001 26.425 0 0 34.756 47-12.244 Table 27. RE DC Power- (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results Plot 13. RE DC Power - (30 MHz 1 GHz), Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 43 of 111

Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) 1004.759 V 17.6 132.3 59.59 24.863 37.132 0 0 47.321 76-28.679 1004.82 H 16.5 100 54.21 24.863 37.132 0 0 41.941 76-34.059 1186.25 V 224.5 100 56.07 24.914 37.199 0 0 43.785 76-32.215 1186.25 H 341.6 100 54.83 24.914 37.199 0 0 42.545 76-33.455 1253.55 H 124 100 52.48 25.147 37.224 0 0 40.403 76-35.597 1253.667 V 221.1 137.7 64.05 25.147 37.224 0 0 51.973 76-24.027 Table 28. RE DC Power Peak - (1-6 GHz) Test Results Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) 1004.759 V 17.6 132.3 57.24 24.863 37.132 0 0 44.971 56-11.029 1004.82 H 16.5 100 54.21 24.863 37.132 0 0 41.941 56-14.059 1186.25 V 224.5 100 54.94 24.914 37.199 0 0 42.655 56-13.345 1186.25 H 341.6 100 54.48 24.914 37.199 0 0 42.195 56-13.805 1253.55 H 124 100 50.39 25.147 37.224 0 0 38.313 56-17.687 1253.667 V 221.1 137.7 63.2 25.147 37.224 0 0 51.123 56-4.877 Table 29. RE DC Power Average - (1-6 GHz) Test Results MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 44 of 111 = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization Plot 14. RE DC Power (1-6 GHz), Plot

Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) 287.09 V 146.4 400 48.76 13.384 28.733 0 0 33.411 46.4-12.989 287.09 H 21.6 335.5 53.96 13.358 28.733 0 0 38.585 46.4-7.815 789.56 H 35.3 113.4 44.74 21.1 27.086 0 0 38.754 46.4-7.646 789.56 V 184.5 199.3 44.11 21.3 27.086 0 0 38.324 46.4-8.076 861.32 V 185.5 196.9 41.15 22.1 26.472 0 0 36.778 46.4-9.622 861.32 H 36.4 100.3 41.77 22 26.472 0 0 37.298 46.4-9.102 Table 30. RE AC Power - (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results Plot 15. RE AC Power - (30 MHz 1 GHz), Plot = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 45 of 111

Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) 1004.759 V 17.6 132.3 57.24 24.863 37.132 0-10.46 34.511 49.5-14.989 1004.82 H 16.5 100 54.21 24.863 37.132 0-10.46 31.481 49.5-18.019 1186.25 V 224.5 100 54.94 24.914 37.199 0-10.46 32.195 49.5-17.305 1186.25 H 341.6 100 54.48 24.914 37.199 0-10.46 31.735 49.5-17.765 1253.55 H 124 100 50.39 25.147 37.224 0-10.46 27.853 49.5-21.647 1253.667 V 221.1 137.7 63.2 25.147 37.224 0-10.46 40.663 49.5-8.837 15031.667 V 86.9 100 29.25 41.342 27.899 0-10.46 32.233 49.5-17.267 17395 V 0 100 26.9 43.384 26.694 0-10.46 33.13 49.5-16.37 Table 31. RE AC Power Peak - (1-18 GHz) Test Results The EUT was tested at 3 m. The data has been corrected for comparison with the 10 m limit using the formula: 20log (3 m/10 m) as expressed in the 'Distance Correction' column. Plot 16. RE AC Power Peak - (1-18 GHz), Plot = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 46 of 111

Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) *25781.55 V 65.1 100 56.86 40.396 40.253 0-10.46 46.543 49.5-2.957 25781.55 H 51.8 100 53.7 40.396 40.253 0-10.46 43.383 49.5-6.117 Table 32. RE AC Power Peak - (18-40 GHz) Test Results Note(s): * - At this frequency, the measured electric-field strength exhibits a margin of compliance that is less than 3 db below the specification limit. We recommend that every emission measured, have at least a 3 db margin to allow for deviations in the emission characteristics that may occur during the production process. The EUT was tested at 3 m. The data has been corrected for comparison with the 10 m limit using the formula: 20log (3 m/10 m) as expressed in the 'Distance Correction' column. Plot 17. RE AC Power Peak - (18-40 GHz), Plot = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 47 of 111

Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) 287.12 V 116.5 100 53.61 13.385 28.733 0 0 38.262 46.4-8.138 287.12 H 250.1 254.1 56.96 13.358 28.733 0 0 41.585 46.4-4.815 742.4 H 116.6 131.8 42.86 20.6 27.286 0 0 36.174 46.4-10.226 742.4 V 156.9 100 36.4 20.848 27.286 0 0 29.962 46.4-16.438 875.04 V 179.5 157.8 39.93 22.001 26.425 0 0 35.506 46.4-10.894 875.04 H 292 282.9 39.18 22.001 26.425 0 0 34.756 46.4-11.644 Table 33. RE DC Power (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results Plot 18. RE DC Power (30 MHz 1 GHz), Plot = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 48 of 111

Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) 1004.759 V 17.6 132.3 57.24 24.863 37.132 0-10.46 34.511 49.5-14.989 1004.82 H 16.5 100 54.21 24.863 37.132 0-10.46 31.481 49.5-18.019 1186.25 V 224.5 100 54.94 24.914 37.199 0-10.46 32.195 49.5-17.305 1186.25 H 341.6 100 54.48 24.914 37.199 0-10.46 31.735 49.5-17.765 1253.55 H 124 100 50.39 25.147 37.224 0-10.46 27.853 49.5-21.647 1253.667 V 221.1 137.7 63.2 25.147 37.224 0-10.46 40.663 49.5-8.837 15031.667 V 86.9 100 29.25 41.342 27.899 0-10.46 32.233 49.5-17.267 17395 V 0 100 26.9 43.384 26.694 0-10.46 33.13 49.5-16.37 Table 34. RE DC Power Average - (1-18 GHz) Test Results Note: The EUT was tested at 3 m. The data has been corrected for comparison with the 10 m limit using the formula: 20log (3 m/10 m) as expressed in the 'Distance Correction' column. Plot 19. RE DC Power Average - (1-18 GHz), Plot = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 49 of 111

Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) *25781.55 V 65.1 100 56.86 40.396 40.253 0-10.46 46.543 49.5-2.957 25781.55 H 51.8 100 53.7 40.396 40.253 0-10.46 43.383 49.5-6.117 Table 35. RE DC Power Peak - (18-40 GHz) Test Results Note(s): * - At this frequency, the measured electric-field strength exhibits a margin of compliance that is less than 3 db below the specification limit. We recommend that every emission measured, have at least a 3 db margin to allow for deviations in the emission characteristics that may occur during the production process. The EUT was tested at 3 m. The data has been corrected for comparison with the 10 m limit using the formula: 20log (3 m/10 m) as expressed in the 'Distance Correction' column. Plot 20. RE DC Power Peak - (18-40 GHz), Plot = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 50 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.4.2.3. Test Setup Photograph Photograph 6. RE Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 51 of 111

Emissions Criteria Photograph 7. 1-18 GHz RE Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 52 of 111

Emissions Criteria Photograph 8. RE Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 53 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.4.2.4. Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Radiated Emissions Electric Field Test Date(s): 03/03/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1S3830 Biconilog Antenna Sunol Sciences Corporation JB3 08/03/2016 08/03/2018 1S2501 EMI Test Receiver 20 Hz-40 GHz Rohde & Schwarz ESU40 01/11/2017 01/11/2018 1S2668 Amplifier Sonoma Instruments 310 N See Note 1S2499 Multi Device Controller ETS EMCO 2090 Not Required 1S2617 Active Horn Antenna Com-Power AHA-118 09/12/2016 09/12/2018 1S2583 Spectrum Analyzer Agilent/Hewlett Packard E4447A 10/31/2016 10/31/2017 1S2635 Preamplifier (1 GHz-27 AML Communications GHz) AML0126L3801 See Note 1S2495 Multi Device Controller ETS EMCO 2090 Not Required 1S3866 Table Top Amplifier MITEQ TTA1840-35-HG See Note 1S2698 Double Ridge Guide Horn Antenna A.H. Systems, Inc. SAS-574 09/27/2016 09/27/2018 1S2481 10 Meter Chamber (NSA) ETS-Lingren DKE- 8X8 DBL See Note Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 36. RE Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 54 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.5. Harmonic Current Emissions 3.5.1. Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures 3.5.1.1. Test Method EN 61000-3-2: 2014 - Limits of Harmonic Current Emissions (Equipment Input Current < 16 A per Phase) The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09), Clause 7.1.2.2 EN 61000-3-2: 2014 Region European European 3.5.1.2. Test Requirements EN 61000-3-2, Section 7 - The EUT must not produce harmonic currents, which exceed the limits expressed in Table 37. Maximum Permissible Harmonic Current Harmonic Order (in Amperes) Odd Harmonics 3 2.30 5 1.14 7 0.77 9 0.40 11 0.33 13 0.21 15 < n < 39 0.15-15/n Maximum Permissible Harmonic Current Harmonic Order (in Amperes) Even Harmonics 2 1.08 4 0.43 6 0.30 8< n <40 0.23-8/n Table 37. Harmonic Current Emission Limits for Class A equipment per Section 7 of EN 61000-3-2 3.5.1.3. Test Procedure The measurement was performed using normal operation of the equipment. The method of testing, test conditions, and test procedures of EN 61000-3-2. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 55 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.5.2. Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List 3.5.2.1. Test Results The EUT was compliant with the requirement(s) of this section. Measured emissions were below applicable limits. Environmental Conditions for Harmonic Current Emission Ambient Temperature: 22 C Relative Humidity: 40% Atmospheric Pressure: 101.9 kpa Test Engineer(s): Joe Vang Test Date(s): 03/24/2017 3.5.2.2. Test Data Class (A, B, C, D) Voltage (V) Current (A) Frequency (Hz) Total Harmonic Distortion (%) A 230 2.83 49.99 0.16 Harmonic # Measured (A) Class A Limit (A) Results Notes 3 0.5096 2.300 Pass None 5 0.1365 1.140 Pass None 7 0.1523 0.770 Pass None 9 0.1094 0.400 Pass None 11 0.0313 0.330 Pass None 13 0.0605 0.21 Pass None 15-39 0.0522 0.0096 0.0136-0.0028 Pass None 2 0.0040 1.080 Pass None 4 0.0046 0.430 Pass None 6 0.0053 0.300 Pass None 8-40 0.0048 0.0034 0.230-0.046 Pass None Table 38. Harmonic Current Emissions Test Results MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 56 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.5.2.3. Test Setup Photograph Photograph 9. Harmonic Current Emissions Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 57 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.5.2.4. Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Harmonic Current Emissions Test Date(s): 03/24/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1T4849 Power Analyzer Yokogawa WT3000 03/22/2017 09/22/2018 4U1646 Elgar DC Power test system Ametek SW21000-1-3-1-149 See Note Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 39. Harmonic Current Emissions Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 58 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.6. Voltage Fluctuations (Flicker) 3.6.1. Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures 3.6.1.1. Test Method EN 61000-3-3: 2013 - Limitation of Voltage Changes, Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker in Public Low-Voltage Supply Systems, for Equipment with Rated Current 16 A per Phase and Not Subject to Conditional Connection The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09), Clause 7.1.2.3 European EN 61000-3-3: 2013 European 3.6.1.2. Test Requirements EN 61000-3-3, Section 5 - The EUT must not produce voltage fluctuations and/or flicker at the supply terminals as measured or calculated according to clause 4, according to limits expressed in Section 5, under test conditions described in Clause 6 and Annex A of EN 61000-3-3. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 59 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.6.1.3. Test Procedure The EUT was operated with an AC main source at 230 VAC, 50 Hz. Tests to prove the compliance of the EUT with the limits of EN 61000-3-3, Clause 5 were made using the test circuit provided in Figure 2 of EN 61000-3-3. The test circuit consisted of the test power supply, the reference impedance, the EUT, and a Power Analyzer. The test supply voltage (open-circuit voltage) was the rated voltage of the equipment. The test voltage was maintained within 2 % of the nominal value. The frequency was 50 Hz ± 0.5%. The total harmonic distortion of the supply voltage was less than 3%. The limits applicable to voltage fluctuations and flicker at the supply terminals of the EUT were automatically measured with the analyzer. Figure 2. Test Circuit for EN 61000-3-3 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 60 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.6.2. Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List 3.6.2.1. Test Results The EUT was compliant with the requirement(s) of this section. Measured emissions were below applicable limits. Environmental Conditions for Voltage Fluctuation (Flicker) Ambient Temperature: 22 C Relative Humidity: 40% Atmospheric Pressure: 101.9 kpa Test Engineer(s): Joe Vang Test Date(s): 03/24/2017 3.6.2.2. Test Data Voltage (V) Current (A) Frequency (Hz) Power Factor 230 2.8304 49.99 0.9745 Average (Is) relative voltage Drop d(t) 0 Relative voltage fluctuation (3s) Dpp 0 d(t) at steady - state level YES /NO yes Last relative steady - state level change Dc 0 Last transition swing Dmax -- Normalized peak flicker (3s) Pp 0 Parameter Observation Period Short Long Limit Observation Time Tp 10 min 120 min Maximum relative voltage change dmax 0 0 4 Max rel. steady-state voltage change dc 0 0 3 Duration of d(t) > 3 % t 0 0 0.2 Short term flicker severity Pst 0.07 0.07 1.0 Long term flicker severity Plt NA 0.07 0.65 Table 40. VF (Flicker) Test Results MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 61 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.6.2.3. Test Setup Photograph Photograph 10. VF (Flicker) Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 62 of 111

Emissions Criteria 3.6.2.4. Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Voltage Fluctuations (Flicker) Test Date(s): 03/24/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1T4849 Power Analyzer Yokogawa WT3000 03/22/2017 09/22/2018 4U1646 Elgar DC Power test system Ametek SW21000-1-3-1-149 See Note Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 41. VF (Flicker) Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 63 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.0 Immunity Criteria 4.1. Electrostatic Discharge 4.1.1. Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures 4.1.1.1. Test Method EN 61000-4-2: 2009 - Electromagnetic Discharge Immunity Test The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region EN 55024: 2010, Clause 4.2.1 European CISPR 24: 2010, Clause 4.2.1 International ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09), Clause 5.1 European 4.1.1.2. Test Requirements EN 55024 The EUT shall be tested with air discharges of up to ±8 kv applied to non-conductive surfaces, and to contact discharges of up to ±4 kv, applied to conductive surfaces of the EUT, HCP and the VCP. ETSI EN 300 386 The immunity test method and laboratory conditions are described in EN 61000-4-2 [9], and as specified in EN 300 386 Clause 5.1 and 7.2.2.1.1. The EUT must not be susceptible to the test levels of Table 1 or Table 6 per section 7.2 of ETSI EN 300 386. Performance Criterion B applies, as specified in EN 300386 Clause 7.2.1.1 [For Telecom Centres, Clause 7.2.1.1] and Clause 7.2.2.1 [For Other Than Telecom Centres, Clause 7.2.2.1]. The EUT shall be connected to the grounding system in accordance with its installation specifications. No additional grounding connections are allowed. 4.1.1.3. Test Procedure The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack in accordance with IEC 61000-4-2. Air discharges of up to ±8 kv were applied to non-conductive surfaces. Contact discharges of up to ±4 kv were applied to conductive surfaces of the EUT and the VCP. Discharges were applied at least ten times to each selected discharge point at each polarity with a minimum time between discharges of 1s. The functionality of the EUT was determined during and after each discharge. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 64 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.1.2. Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List 4.1.2.1. Test Results The EUT was compliant with the requirement(s) of this section. No anomalies observed. Environmental Conditions for Electrostatic Discharge Ambient Temperature: 25 C Relative Humidity: 45.6% Atmospheric Pressure: 101.9 kpa Test Engineer(s): Juy Yang Test Date(s): 03/27/2017 4.1.2.2. Test Data Discharge Test Voltage Results Type (±kv) Front Back Left Right Anomalies EN 55024 VCP 4 Pass Pass Pass Pass No anomalies observed. Contact 2 Pass Pass Pass Pass No anomalies observed. Discharge 4 Pass Pass Pass Pass No anomalies observed. 2 Pass Pass N/A N/A No anomalies observed. Air Discharge 4 Pass Pass N/A N/A No anomalies observed. 6 Pass Pass N/A N/A No anomalies observed. 8 Pass Pass N/A N/A No anomalies observed. ETSI 300 386 Discharge Test Voltage Results Type (±kv) Front Back Left Right Anomalies VCP 4 Pass Pass Pass Pass No anomalies observed Contact 2 Pass Pass Pass Pass No anomalies observed Discharge 4 Pass Pass Pass Pass No anomalies observed Air Discharge 2 Pass Pass N/A N/A No anomalies observed 4 Pass Pass N/A N/A No anomalies observed Table 42. ESD Test Results MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 65 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.1.2.3. ESD Test Point Photographs Photograph 11. ESD Test Points Front of EUT Photograph 12. ESD Test Points Rear of EUT X = Contact Discharge Test Points O = Air Discharge Test Points MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 66 of 111

Immunity Criteria Photograph 13. ESD Test Points Right of EUT Photograph 14. ESD Test Points Left of EUT X = Contact Discharge Test Points MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 67 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.1.2.4. Test Setup Photograph Photograph 15. ESD Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 68 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.1.2.5. Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Electrostatic Discharge Test Date(s): 03/27/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1U175 Electrostatic Discharge Simulator Noise Laboratory ESS-2000 09/29/2016 09/29/2017 1U176 Electrostatic Discharge Gun Noise Laboratory TC-815R 09/29/2016 09/29/2017 1U076 Test Area Ground Plane 1 MET Laboratories N/A Functional Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 43. ESD Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 69 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.2. Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Field 4.2.1. Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures 4.2.1.1. Test Method EN 61000-4-3: 2006 +A1:2008 +A2:2010 Radiated, Radio-Frequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region EN 55024: 2010, Clause 4.2.3 European CISPR 24: 2010, Clause 4.2.3 International ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09), Clause 5.5 European 4.2.1.2. Test Requirements EN 55024 The frequency ranges below were performed per Performance Criterion A: Frequency Range Modulation Test Level 80 MHz 1000 MHz 80% AM, 1 khz 3 V/m ETSI EN 300 386 The EUT must not be susceptible to electromagnetic field in the frequency range of: Frequency Range Modulation Test Level 80 MHz 800 MHz 3 V/m 800 960 MHz 10 V/m 960 1000 MHz 80% AM, 1 khz 3 V/m 1400 2000 MHz 10 V/m 2000 2700 MHz 3 V/m Performance Criterion A applies, as specified in EN 300 386 Clause 7.2.1.1 [For Telecom Centres, Clause 7.2.1.1.2] and Clause 7.2.2.1 [For Other Than Telecom Centres, Clause 7.2.2.1.2]. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 70 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.2.1.3. Test Procedure Testing was performed in a semi-anechoic chamber as recommended by IEC 61000-4-3. The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack located in the area of field uniformity. The radiating antenna was placed 2.2 m in front of the EUT. Support equipment for the EUT was located outside of the test room. The amplitude, frequency, and dwell time of the radiated interference was controlled by an automated, computer-controlled system. The signal source was stepped through the applicable frequency range at a rate no faster than 1% of the fundamental. The signal was 80% amplitude modulated with 1 khz over the frequency range: The dwell time was set at 1 s. Field presence was monitored during testing via a field probe placed in close proximity to the EUT. Throughout testing, the EUT was closely monitored for signs of susceptibility. The test was performed with the antennae oriented in both a horizontal and vertical polarization. 4.2.2. Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List 4.2.2.1. Test Result The EUT was compliant with the requirement(s) of this section. No anomalies observed. Environmental Conditions for Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Field Ambient Temperature: 21 C Relative Humidity: 49% Atmospheric Pressure: 101.4 kpa Test Engineer(s): Bao Nguyen Test Date(s): 03/19/2017 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 71 of 111

Immunity Criteria Start Frequency (MHz) 4.2.2.2. Test Data Stop Frequency (MHz) Severity (V/m) Polarity (H/V) Modulation (Freq & Type) Results Front Back Left Right EN 550254 80 1000 10 V 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 80 1000 10 H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass ETSI 300 386 80 800 10 V 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 80 800 10 H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 800 960 10 V 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 800 960 10 H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 960 1000 10 V 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 960 1000 10 H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 1400 2000 10 V 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 1400 2000 10 H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 2000 2700 10 V 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 2000 2700 10 H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass Table 44. RI Test Results Frequency (MHz) Severity (V/m) Polarity (V/H) Modulation (Freq & Type) Results Front Back Left Right EN 550254 80 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 120 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 160 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 230 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 434 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 460 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 600 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 863 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 900 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass ETSI 300 386 434 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 450 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 850 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 900 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 1800 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 72 of 111

Immunity Criteria Frequency (MHz) Severity (V/m) Polarity (V/H) Modulation (Freq & Type) Results Front Back Left Right 1950 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 2100 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass 2400 10 V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass Table 45. RI FOKI Test Results Update EUT Clocks (MHz) Polarity Results Anomalies R3-18: Field Strength 10 V/m 12.8 V&H Pass No anomalies observed. 32.768 V&H Pass No anomalies observed. 48 V&H Pass No anomalies observed. 50 V&H Pass No anomalies observed. 125 V&H Pass No anomalies observed. Table 46. RI EUT Clock Frequencies Test Results Update MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 73 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.2.2.3. Test Setup Photograph Photograph 16. RI Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 74 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.2.2.4. Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Field Test Date(s): 03/18/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1S3927 Microwave Signal Generator Rohde & Schwarz SMF100A 11/02/2016 05/02/2018 1U0227 Signal Generator Gigatronics 6061A 12/03/2015 06/03/2017 1U0261 TWT Amplifier CPI VKV2776K4 See Note 1U0109 Wide Band Amp IFI SMX201 See Note 1U0025 Wideband System Amplifier IFI CMX5001 See Note 1U0257 Amplifier Amplifier Research 25S1G4A See Note 1U0303 E-field Probe Narda PMM EP601 01/21/2016 07/21/2017 1U0022 Parallel Element Antenna EMCO 3107B See Note 1U0115 Antenna, Horn EMCO 3115 See Note 1U0040 Antenna, Biconilog Schaffner CBL6140A See Note 1U0033 Immunity Chamber Lindgren Enclosures FACT 3 See Note Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 47. RI Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 75 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.3. Electrical Fast Transient/Burst 4.3.1. Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures 4.3.1.1. Test Method EN 61000-4-4: 2004 - Electrical Fast Transient/Burst Immunity Test The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region EN 55024: 2010, Clause 4.2.2 European CISPR 24: 2010, Clause 4.2.2 International ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09), Clause 5.2 European 4.3.1.2. Test Requirements EN 55024 The EUT shall be tested with the electrical fast transients shown in Figure 3, having an amplitude of up to ±1 kv applied to AC power ports and ±0.5 kv applied to DC power ports and signal ports. This is applicable to signal ports interfacing with cables whose total length according to the manufacturer s functional specification may exceed 3 m. The test setup, test methods, required test equipment, and the test limits of EN 61000-4-4 are to be used. ETSI EN 300 386, Applicable Clauses Electrical Fast Transients/Bursts on Equipment for Use in Telecom Centres, Port Type Requirements Enclosure Ports Outdoor Signal Ports Indoor Signal Ports AC Power Ports DC Power Ports N/A 7.2.1.2.1 7.2.1.3.1* 7.2.1.4.1 7.2.1.5.1* * Note 1: Only applies when cables longer than 3 m are connected. Electrical Fast Transients/Bursts on Equipment for Use in Other than Telecom Centres, Port Type Requirements Enclosure Ports Outdoor Signal Ports Indoor Signal Ports AC Power Ports DC Power Ports N/A 7.2.2.2.1 7.2.2.3.1* 7.2.2.4.1 7.2.2.5.1* * Note 1: Only applies when cables longer than 3 m are connected. The EUT was tested with the electrical fast transients shown in Figure 3, having an amplitude of ±1 kv applied to the AC and DC power cables; ±0.5 kv applied to I/O and data lines. Only cables that could potentially exceed 3 m in length in real-world application of the EUT need to be tested. Performance Criterion B applies for all tests. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 76 of 111

Immunity Criteria Figure 3. Fast Transient Test Waveform from EN 61000-4-4 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 77 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.3.1.3. Test Procedure The Electrical Fast Transient/Burst (EFT/B) generator and the coupling clamp (if used) were mounted to the ground plane. The EFT/B generator was operated to couple the required transient bursts to each line of the AC power input in common mode through its internal coupling/decoupling network. Transient bursts were applied for a period not less than one minute with both positive transients and negative transients. The EFT/B generator was operated to directly couple the required transient bursts to each line of the DC power input in common mode through an inline 33nF capacitor in series via the direct output of the generator. Transient bursts were applied for a period not less than one minute with both positive and negative transients. The EFT/B generator was operated to couple the required transient bursts to each I/O, data, or control lines through the capacitive coupling clamp if applicable. Transient bursts were applied for a period not less than one minute with both positive transients and negative transients. Throughout testing, the EUT was monitored closely for signs of susceptibility. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 78 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.3.2. Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List 4.3.2.1. Test Result The EUT was compliant with the requirement(s) of this section. No anomalies observed. Environmental Conditions for Fast Transients Ambient Temperature: 21 C Relative Humidity: 49% Atmospheric Pressure: 101.4 kpa Test Engineer(s): Joe Vang Test Date(s): 03/21/2017 4.3.2.2. Test Data Port Name Test Level Coupling Method Result Anomalies DC Power DC ±1 kv CCC Pass None AC ±1 kv CDN Pass None I/O Cables NCT1 ±0.5 kv CCC Pass None DCN ±0.5 kv CCC Pass None Table 48. EFT/B Test Results MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 79 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.3.2.3. Test Setup Photograph Photograph 17. EFT/B AC Power Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 80 of 111

Immunity Criteria Photograph 18. EFT/B DC Power Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 81 of 111

Immunity Criteria Photograph 19. EFT/B I/O Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 82 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.3.2.4. Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Electrical Fast Transients/Bursts Test Date(s): 03/18/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1U262 UCS 500 M EM Test UCS500M6B 08/16/2016 08/16/2017 1U263 Capacitive Coupling Clamp EM Test HFK Functional 1U085 Test Area Ground Plane 2 MET Laboratories N/A Functional Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 49. EFT/B Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 83 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.4. Surge 4.4.1. Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures 4.4.1.1. Test Method EN 61000-4-5: 2006 - Surge Immunity Test The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region EN 55024: 2010, Clause 4.2.5 European CISPR 24: 2010, Clause 4.2.5 International ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09), Clause 5.3 European 4.4.1.2. Test Requirements EN 55024 The EUT shall be tested with the surge test waveforms shown in Figure 4. AC Power Ports shall be tested to surges having an open circuit amplitude of ±1 kv (differential mode), and ±2 kv (common mode). DC Power Ports shall be tested to surges having an open circuit amplitude of ±0.5 kv. This is applicable to ports interfacing with cables which according to manufacturer s specification may connect directly to outdoor cables. The test setup, test methods, required test equipment, and the test limits of EN 61000-4-5 shall be used. ETSI EN 300 386, Applicable Clauses: The required test levels are compiled in the following table outlining the applicable Clauses: Surges on Equipment for Use in Telecom Centers, Port Type Requirements Outdoor Signal Indoor Signal Enclosure Ports AC Power Ports DC Power Ports Ports Ports N/A 7.2.1.2.2 7.2.1.3.2* 7.2.1.4.2 N/A Surges on Equipment for Use in Other than Telecom Centers, Port Type Requirements Outdoor Signal Indoor Signal Enclosure Ports AC Power Ports DC Power Ports Ports Ports N/A 7.2.2.2.2 7.2.2.3.2* 7.2.2.4.2 N/A * Note: Only applies when cables longer than 10 m are connected. Ella, update notes The EUT was tested with the surge waveforms shown on the following page, having an open circuit amplitude of ±2 kv applied to phase to ground and neutral to ground, ±1 kv applied to phase to neutral and ±0.5 kv applied to the I/O indoor signal lines and ±1 kv applied to outdoor signal lines. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 84 of 111

Immunity Criteria Figure 4. Surge Test Waveforms from EN 61000-4-5 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 85 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.4.1.3. Test Procedure The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack. EUT, power was supplied to the EUT through the coupling/decoupling section of the surge generator. For AC power lines, surge waveforms were coupled by the internal coupling/decoupling network of the surge generator. Each power line under test (if applicable) was subjected to at least five positive and five negative surges at the appropriate voltage and phase angle, at a maximum repetition rate of 1/min. Throughout testing, the EUT was monitored for signs of susceptibility. For DC power lines, surge waveforms were directly injected using the direct output of the surge generator. Each power line under test (if applicable) was subjected to at least five positive and five negative surges at the appropriate voltage at a maximum repetition rate of 1/min. Throughout testing, the EUT was monitored for signs of susceptibility. Open Circuit Voltage: Short Circuit Current: Telecom wave parameters: Front Time = 1.2 µs Time to Half = 50 µs Front Time = 8 µs Time to Half = 20 µs Front Time = 10 µs Time to Half = 700 µs Table 50. Combination Wave Generator Test Parameters for Surge Immunity Testing For AC power lines, the Combination Wave Generator was operated to couple the required surges between each EUT input power phase and ground, and from line to line. These three tests were performed with positive surges and negative surges, synchronized with the power input phase at 0, 90, and 270. Throughout testing, the EUT was monitored closely for signs of susceptibility. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 86 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.4.2. Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List 4.4.2.1. Test Result The EUT was compliant with the requirement(s) of this section. No anomalies were observed. Environmental Conditions for Surge Ambient Temperature: 25 C Relative Humidity: 46.5% Atmospheric Pressure: 101.9 kpa Test Engineer(s): Juy Yang Test Date(s): 03/28/2017 4.4.2.2. Test Data Port Name Coupling Phase Test Level Coupling Method Results Anomalies EN 55024 AC, Differential Mode AC AC AC DC Power Supply Phase to Neutral Phase to Ground Neutral to Ground Line to Ground 0 ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 90 ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 180 ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 270 ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None AC, Common Mode 0 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 90 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 180 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 270 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 0 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 90 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 180 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 270 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None DC Power NA ±500 V Direct Injection Pass No anomalies observed IO Cables (Outdoor Only) N/A Line to Ground NA ±1.0 kv Direct Injection N/A N/A ETSI 300 386 0 ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None AC Phase to 90 ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None Neutral 180 ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 270 ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None AC Phase to 0 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 87 of 111

Immunity Criteria Port Name Coupling Phase Test Level Coupling Method Results Anomalies Ground 90 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 180 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 270 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None AC DCN NCT1 N/A Neutral to Ground Line to Ground Line to Ground Line to Ground Table 51. Surge Test Results 0 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 90 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 180 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 270 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None IO Cables (Indoor) NA ±0.5 kv Direct Injection Pass None NA ±0.5 kv Direct Injection Pass None IO Cables (Indoor) NA ±1.0 kv Direct Injection N/A N/A MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 88 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.4.2.3. Test Setup Photograph Photograph 20. AC Surge Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 89 of 111

Immunity Criteria Photograph 21. I/O Surge Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 90 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.4.2.4. Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Surge Test Date(s): 03/28/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1U262 UCS 500 M EM Test UCS 500M6B 08/16/2016 08/16/2017 1U076 Test Area Ground Plane 1 MET Laboratories N/A Functional Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 52. Surge Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 91 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.5. Radio Frequency, Conducted Continuous 4.5.1. Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures 4.5.1.1. Test Method EN 61000-4-6: 2009 - Immunity to Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio- Frequency Fields The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region EN 55024: 2010, Clause 4.2.4.2 European CISPR 24: 2010, Clause 4.2.4.2 International ETSI EN 300 386 V1.6.1 (2012-09), Clause 5.4 European 4.5.1.2. Test Requirements EN 55024 This test is applicable for AC and DC power lines connected directly to mains supply and Signal Ports interfacing with cables whose total length according to the manufacturer s functional specification may exceed 3 m. The AC and DC power lines and applicable Signal Ports shall be tested to an injected level of 3 Vrms. The injection voltage shall be amplitude modulated 80% by a 1 khz tone over the frequency range of 150 khz to 80 MHz. ETSI EN 300 386 The required test levels are compiled in the following table outlining the applicable Clauses: Radio Frequency, Conducted Continuous on Equipment for Use in Telecom Centres, Port Type Requirements Enclosure Ports Outdoor Signal Ports Indoor Signal Ports AC Power Ports DC Power Ports N/A 7.2.1.2.3 7.2.1.3.3* 7.2.1.4.3 7.2.1.5.2* * Note 1: Only applies when cables longer than 3 m are connected Radio Frequency, Conducted Continuous on Equipment for Use in Other than Telecom Centres, Port Type Requirements Enclosure Ports Outdoor Signal Ports Indoor Signal Ports AC Power Ports DC Power Ports N/A 7.2.2.2.3 7.2.2.3.3 * 7.2.2.4.3 7.2.2.5.2* * Note 1: Only applies when cables longer than 3 m are connected MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 92 of 111

Immunity Criteria All interconnecting cables on the EUT including AC and DC power lines, data and control lines shall be tested for immunity to conducted radio frequencies in the range 0.15 MHz - 80 MHz. Using the bulk current injection method, DC Cables, I/O and data cables must be tested to a level of 3 Vrms. The injection voltage shall be amplitude modulated at 80% by a 1 khz sine wave. 4.5.1.3. Test Procedures The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack. For power AC and DC line cables, a Coupling Decoupling Network (CDN) was used for injection. The CDN was initially calibrated in a calibration jig with a 50 W RF load and a 100 W matching resistor on one side, and a 100 W matching resistor and the receiver (spectrum analyzer) on the other. The injection voltage level was adjusted to maintain a monitored voltage of 3 Vrms across the frequency range 0.15 MHz to 80 MHz. For USB cables other than the power line, the direct injection method was used for injection. The insulation of the cable under test was removed, and the output of the injecting equipment was applied to the exposed screen via a 100 ohm resistor. For all other cables other than the power line, coupling and decoupling disturbing signals to an unscreened cable with CDN-T2, CDN-T4 or CDN-T8 shall be used as coupling and decoupling network (CDN) for injection. The CDN was initially calibrated in a calibration jig with a 50 Ω RF load and a 100 Ω matching resistor on one side, and a 100 Ω matching resistor and the receiver (spectrum analyzer) on the other. The injection voltage level was adjusted to maintain a monitored voltage of 3 Vrms across the frequency range 0.15 MHz to 80 MHz. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 93 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.5.2. Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List 4.5.2.1. Test Result The EUT was compliant with the requirement(s) of this section. No anomalies observed. Environmental Conditions for Radio Frequency, Conducted Continuous Ambient Temperature: 22 C Relative Humidity: 41% Atmospheric Pressure: 101.9 kpa Test Engineer(s): Joe Vang Test Date(s): 03/21/2017 4.5.2.2. Test Data Port Name On Modulation Coupling Severity (Vrms) EUT (Freq & Type) Method Results Anomalies DC 3 1 khz, 80%AM CDN Pass None AC 3 1 khz, 80%AM CDN Pass None NCT1 3 1 khz, 80%AM CDN Pass None DCN 3 1 khz, 80%AM CDN Pass None USB 3 1 khz, 80%AM Direct Pass None Table 53. CI Test Results MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 94 of 111

Immunity Criteria 4.5.2.3. Test Setup Photograph Photograph 22. CI AC Power Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 95 of 111

Immunity Criteria Photograph 23. CI DC Power Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 96 of 111

Immunity Criteria Photograph 24. CI IO Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 97 of 111