IEEE C802.16d-04/26

Similar documents
IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

AAS Maps Format for OFDM

Changes in ARQ IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 8.2)

IEEE C802.16d-04/40. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Extended IE format for concurrent transmission of bursts

IEEE d -04/35r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

John Liebetreu and Randall Scwartz

A Mixed OFDM Downlink and Single Carrier Uplink for the 2-11 GHz Licensed Bands

IEEE C802.16a-02/94r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/011. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Discuss the MAC messages supporting the CSI, such as DCD, DL-MAP etc.

IEEE C802.16d-04/88r2. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Additional comments to P802.16d/D2

Title: LE Task Group Report - Session #45

C802.16a-02/68. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Working Group Review of Working Document 802.

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Clarification of H-ARQ Operation with Reduced AAS Private Map

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Merging CXCC sub-channels 1-4 and CSI sub-channel into one figure

IEEE C802.16h-06/015. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16a-02/46. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-05/001. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Initial rangin clarifications for OFDMA PHY

IEEE C802.16h-07/013. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16e-04/518r1 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/109. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Interpolation Effects For OFDM Preamble

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < WirelessMAN coexistence function primitives consolidation

IEEE C802.16d-04/47. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Editorial correction to use of the Term-of-Art 'backbone network'

IEEE le-04/04. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/050

IEEE C802.16e-03/ Kwangjae Lim, Choongil Yeh, Hyungsoo Lim and Dongseung Kwon

IEEE C /07. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/050r2

IEEE C802.16e-04/517 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C /008. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/127. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-05/022r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16maint-07/033

Network Management Study Group Closing Plenary Report

IEEE C802.16e-05/039. Pilot carriers can be used as secondary Fast-feedback channel or secondary UL ACK channel in OFDMA

IEEE abc-01/56r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < The unified TLV encoding for DCD and UCD in OFDMA PHY mode

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16d-04/47r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Corrections and clarifications to the d OFDMA Channel Coding

IEEE C802.16h-06/071. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

C802.16g-05/039

IEEE abc-01/23. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

UCP simulation: Approach and Initial Results

IEEE C802.16e-04/403 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-07/012. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-07/054r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Show some simulation result for the energy pulse symbol duration

IEEE C802.16h-06/022r1

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/022

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/090

Assignments of Pilots for 256 FFT OFDMA mode

IEEE C802.16h-05/030r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Framework for Enabling Closed-loop MIMO for OFDMA

David Grandblaise Voice: +33 (0) Motorola Fax: +33 (0)

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Proposed PAR to convert P802.16d from Amendment to Revision

IEEE C802.16e-05/059r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/042

Simulating coexistence between y and h systems in the 3.65 GHz band Scenarios and assumptions

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Procedure in community Entry of new BS

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Action Item from Session #48: UTC time stamp text remedy

IEEE C802.16d-03/24r0. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < updating the text related to CSI under CX-Frame scheme

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Voice: Fax:

IEEE C802.16e-05/143r4. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-07/051. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-05/020. Proposal for credit tokens based co-existence resolution and negotiation protocol

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Channel estimation issues for TDD and FDD OFDM

C802.16a-02/76. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Coverage/Capacity simulations for OFDMA PHY in with ITU-T channel model

Common PHY & Messages for Neighbor Discovery Using CTS

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-07/003r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16e-04/420. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Per Stream Power Control in CQICH Enhanced Allocation IE

Zion Hadad Voice: RunCom Communitcations Ltd. Fax: Hachoma st. Rishon le-zion, Israel

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Interference Management Procedure in the Operating Stage

Switched beam antennas in millimeter-wave band broadband wireless access networks

Proposals for facilitating co-channel and adjacent channel coexistence in LE

IEEE C802.16h-06/038r2. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Mesh Networks in Fixed Broadband Wireless Access

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Working Group Review of Working Document IEEE 802.

IEEE C802.16d-03/23

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Transcription:

2004-03-11 IEEE C802.16d-04/26 Project Title Date Submitted IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <http://ieee802.org/16> Changes to Focused Contention in OFDM-256 Mode 2004-03-11 Source(s) Re: David A Castelow Airspan Communications, Cambridge House, Oxford Road, Uxbridge, UK Naftali Chayat, Alvarion, 21 A Habarzel St. Ramat Hahayal Tel - Aviv 69710 P.O. Box 13139, Tel-Aviv 61131, Israel Adam Kerr, ArrayComm. 2480 N. First Street, Suite #200, San Jose, CA 95131 Supporting document for Sponsor Ballot Voice: +44 1895 467281 Fax: +44 1895 467202 mailto:dcastelow@airspan.com Abstract Purpose Notice Release Patent Policy and Procedures Changes required in order to enable Focused Contention in sub-channel enabled BS. The document is intended for consideration within comments resolution process. This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.16. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16. The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802.16 Patent Policy and Procedures <http://ieee802.org/16/ipr/patents/policy.html>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <mailto:chair@wirelessman.org> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.16 Working Group. The Chair will disclose this notification via the IEEE 802.16 web site <http://ieee802.org/16/ipr/patents/notices>. 0

Changes to Support Focused Contention with Sub-channelized Modes David Castelow, Naftali Chayat, Adam Kerr Airspan, Alvarion, ArrayComm March 2004 References IEEE, Draft IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems, IEEE P802.16-REVd/D3-2004. 2. C802.16a-02/12, Contention Schemes For OFDM Mode A L,Revision 0 (Jerry Krinock, Manoneet Singh, Mike Paff, Arvind Lonkar, Lawrence Fung, 02/01/04) 3. C802.16a-02/14, Supplement to "Contention Schemes For OFDM Mode A L,Revision 0" (Jerry Krinock, Manoneet Singh, Mike Paff, Arvind Lonkar, Lawrence Fung, 02/01/16). 4. Naftali Chayat, Tal Kaitz, Vladimir Yanover (Alvarion Ltd.), Paul Petrus, Adam Kerr (ArrayComm Inc.) Maps Format in AAS, IEEE 802.16-04/???r0, March 2004. Introduction The changes proposed in this document are to modify the Focused Contention option for the OFDM Physical Layer of IEEE P802.16- REVd [1], originally proposed as part of 802.16a by the contributions [2,3]. The changes are proposed in order to simplify the implementation of focused contention within transmitters that support subchannelisation, by aligning the focused contention carriers with sub-sets of the subchannelisation carriers, and to allow Basestations that support both subchannelisation and focused contention to do so simultaneously. In 1/16 bandwidth sub-channels there are 12 carriers: 4 groups of 3 carriers, and the intention is that this provides 3 focused contention groups. A new UCD message is defined in order that the BS can signal to the SS the set of Contentions Codes to be used in the focused contention interval. This has been selected in preference to an additional field in the UL-MAP because the compressed UL-MAP [4] has no spare capacity, although it does means the UCD has an additional TLV of total length 3 bytes. Text Changes Page 145, Line 28: 6.4.6.4 Contention-based focused Bandwidth Requests for WirelessMAN-OFDM The WirelessMAN-OFDM PHY supports two contention-based Bandwidth Request mechanisms. The mandatory mechanism allows the SS to send the bandwidth request header as specified in 6.4.6.1 during a REQ Region-Full. Alternatively, the SS may send a Focused Contention Transmission during a REQ Region- Focused. This transmission consists of a Contention Code modulated on a, Contention Channel consisting of 4 carriers. The selection of the Contention Code is done with equal probability among amongst up to the 8 possible codes. 1

The selection of the Contention Channel is done with equal probability among the time/frequency transmit opportunities applicable to the SS. Upon detection, the BS shall provide a uplink allocation for the SS to transmit a Bandwidth Request MAC PDU and optionally additional data, but instead of indicating a Basic CID, the broadcast CID shall be sent in combination with an OFDM Focused_Contention_IE, which specifies the Contention Channel, Contention Code, and Transmit Opportunity that were used by the SS. This allows an SS to determine whether it has been given an allocation by matching these parameters with the parameters it used. See also 8.3.6.3.3. Page 440, Lines 1 to 19, change as marked: 8.3.6.3.1 Parameter selection The SS shall examine the UL_MAP message for a future frame and select (in accordance with 6.4.8) a future REQ Region during which to make its request. If Focused Contention Supported = 1 was returned by the BS in SBC-RSP message during SS initialization and if the SS is capable of focused contention, it may choose either a REQ Region-Full or REQ Region-Focused. Otherwise, it shall choose a REQ Region-Full. If the chosen REQ Region is a REQ Region-Focused, the SS shall also select, at random with equal probability, a contention code from Table 219 and a contention channel from Table 220. The contention code shall be selected at random with equal probability from the set of codes specified by the current Contention Code Selection (CCS). The and similarly a contention channel shall be selected from Table 220 based upon a random selection with equal probability amongst the group of contention channels that are compatible with the subchannel specified for the allocation. The indices { 100 to +100} in the body of Table 220 refer to the subcarrier indices as defined in 8.3.2.4. The Contention Code Selection is transmitted in the UCD channel encoding TLV messages. The default value of CCS is 15. If the BS supports subchannelization, the last C SE contention codes channels from those compatible with the allocation shall only be used by subchannelization enabled SSs that wish to receive a subchannelized allocation. In response, the BS may provide the requested allocation as a subchannelized allocation; and may provide the requested allocation as a full (default) allocation, or may provide no allocation at all. The value of C SE is transmitted in the UCD channel encoding TLV messages. The default value of C SE is 0. Page 440, Line 24: Replace Table 219 with: 15 Contention Code Selection 12 8 9 13 10 11 Contention bit 0 bit 1 bit 2 bit 3 code index 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 6 6 1 1 1 1 7 7 1 1 1 1 Replace, Page 440, Line 47 to Page 441, Line 12: Table 220 OFDM Contention channels 2

Contention channel index index 0 index 1 index 2 index 3 0 100-50 1 51 1 99 49 2 52 2-98 48 3 53............... K k-100 k-50 k+1 k+51............... 48-52 -2 49 99 49-51 -1 50 100 With index 0 index 1 index 2 index 3 Contention channel index 0-100 -37 1 64 00001 1-99 -36 2 65 00001 2-98 -35 3 66 00001 3-97 -34 4 67 00011 4-96 -33 5 68 00011 5-95 -32 6 69 00011 6-94 -31 7 70 00101 7-93 -30 8 71 00101 8-92 -29 9 72 00101 9-91 -28 10 73 00111 10-90 -27 11 74 00111 11-89 -26 12 75 00111 12-87 -50 14 51 01001 13-86 -49 15 52 01001 14-85 -48 16 53 01001 15-84 -47 17 54 01011 16-83 -46 18 55 01011 17-82 -45 19 56 01011 18-81 -44 20 57 01101 19-80 -43 21 58 01101 20-79 -42 22 59 01101 Contention Channel belongs to subchannel (See Table 185) 3

21-78 -41 23 60 01111 22-77 -40 24 61 01111 23-76 -39 25 62 01111 24-75 -12 26 89 10001 25-74 -11 27 90 10001 26-73 -10 28 91 10001 27-72 -9 29 92 10011 28-71 -8 30 93 10011 29-70 -7 31 94 10011 30-69 -6 32 95 10101 31-68 -5 33 96 10101 32-67 -4 34 97 10101 33-66 -3 35 98 10111 34-65 -2 36 99 10111 35-64 -1 37 100 10111 36-62 -25 39 76 11001 37-61 -24 40 77 11001 38-60 -23 41 78 11001 39-59 -22 42 79 11011 40-58 -21 43 80 11011 41-57 -20 44 81 11011 42-56 -19 45 82 11101 43-55 -18 46 83 11101 44-54 -17 47 84 11101 45-53 -16 48 85 11111 46-52 -15 49 86 11111 47-51 -14 50 87 11111 8.3.6.3.3 Focused Contention transmission The REQ Region-Focused bandwidth requesting mechanism consists of two phases. The Phase-1 is that an SS requesting bandwidth sends a signal to the BS in the uplink TO of REQ Region Focused identified by UIUC=3. One REQ Region Focused uplink interval with UIUC=3 shall be 4 subcarriers by two OFDM symbols. The Phase-1 bandwidth requesting signal transmission is described in this section. Following the Phase-1, the BS may include in its UL-MAP an allocation for the SS using UIUC=4 and the Focused_Contention_IE as defined in Table 210. The SS is identified in this Focused_Contention_IE by the 4

Frame Number index, Transmit Opportunity index, Contention Channel index, and Contention Code index whichwhich that the SS used to send the Phase-1 bandwidth requesting signal. The Phase-2 is that the SS requesting bandwidth responds to this UL-MAP allocation with a bandwidth request MAC header as defined in 6.4.2.1.2. The Phase-2 uplink interval with UIUC=4 shall consist of a short preamble and shall have the duration indicated by the relevant field of the UL-MAP_IE() and shall use the most robust mandatory burst profile. If the chosen REQ Region is a REQ Region-Focused, after choosing its four parameters, the SS shall transmit, during the chosen Transmit Opportunity in the chosen frame, four subcarriers that comprise the chosen contention channel. The amplitude of all other subcarriers shall be zero. During both OFDM symbols, the amplitude of each of the four subcarriers shall be boosted somewhat above its normal amplitude, i.e., the amplitude used during a noncontention OFDM symbol, including the current power-control correction. The boost in db shall equal the value of the Focused Contention Power Boost parameter in the current UCD. During the first OFDM symbol of the Transmit Opportunity, the phase of the four subcarriers is not specified. During the second OFDM symbol of the Transmit Opportunity, the phases shall depend on the corresponding bit in the chosen contention code, and the phase transmitted during the first OFDM symbol on the same subcarrier. If the code bit is +1, the phase shall be the same as that transmitted during the first OFDM symbol. If the code bit is 1, the phase shall be inverted, 180 degrees with respect to the phase transmitted during the first OFDM symbol. Page 607, Table 279, Line 52, add additional row to table: Contention Code Selection (CCS) 152 Index of the contention codes to use. Default value 15. 5