CRETE: Towards a RIS3 strategy. Heraklion, Crete, September 2013 ARTEMIS SAITAKIS DIRECTOR SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY PARK OF CRETE

Similar documents
Post : RIS 3 and evaluation

Developing Smart Specialisation through Targeted Support

Smart specialisation strategies what kind of strategy?

Burgundy : Towards a RIS3

Research and innovation strategies for smart specialization

EC proposal for the next MFF/smart specialisation

COST FP9 Position Paper

Smart specialisation interactions between the regional and the national

Support R&D and Innovation in Portugal 2020

Challenges for the New Cohesion Policy nd joint EU Cohesion Policy Conference

THE BLUEMED INITIATIVE AND ITS STRATEGIC RESEARCH AGENDA

Economic and Social Council

Water, Energy and Environment in the scope of the Circular Economy

Castilla y León: Towards a RIS3 strategy

Conclusions on the future of information and communication technologies research, innovation and infrastructures

TOWARD THE NEXT EUROPEAN RESEARCH PROGRAMME

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH & RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS. Dr. Agnes Spilioti Head of R&DI Policy Planning Directorate

OECD-INADEM Workshop on

Ministry of. Economic Development

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

Conclusions concerning various issues related to the development of the European Research Area

Research Infrastructures and Innovation

Research and Innovation Strategy for the Smart Specialisation of Catalonia. Brussels March 20th, 2014

Marie Skłodowska- Curie Actions under Horizon2020

Pacts for Europe 2020: Good Practices and Views from EU Cities and Regions

Horizon 2020 Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Consultancy on Technological Foresight

RIS3 as a tool for change. Alessandro Rainoldi JRC.IPTS 24 June 2013

MILAN DECLARATION Joining Forces for Investment in the Future of Europe

10246/10 EV/ek 1 DG C II

COSME Financial Perspectives European programmes and funds to foster growth Madrid 30 October/Seville 31 October 2013

SMART SPECIALIZATION PROCESS: THE CASE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA SERGIU PORCESCU JRC NCP KNOWLEDGE HUB MOLDOVA

demonstrator approach real market conditions would be useful to provide a unified partner search instrument for the CIP programme

Towards a new place-based approach & a smartly specialised, innovative Danube Region

SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE MACEDONIAN INNOVATION SYSTEM AND POLICY

Nektarios Tavernarakis Chairman of the Board, FORTH Professor, Medical School University of Crete

Seoul Initiative on the 4 th Industrial Revolution

Chapter 11 Cooperation, Promotion and Enhancement of Trade Relations

The Role Of Public Policy In Innovation Processes Brussels - May 4 th, 2011

Cyprus Presidency of the Council of the European Union

HORIZON Peter van der Hijden. ACA Seminar What s new in Brussels Policies and Programme 20 th January Research & Innovation.

Innovation support instruments a policy mix approach

Project Territorial Strategies for Innovation

Higher Education for Science, Technology and Innovation. Accelerating Africa s Aspirations. Communique. Kigali, Rwanda.

EU initiatives supporting universities

MEDLAB Mediterranean Living Lab for Territorial Innovation. Panagiotis Georgopoulos Region of Central Macedonia

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

Workshop on Enabling Technologies in CSF for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Werner Wobbe. Employed at the European Commission, Directorate General Research and Innovation

First "Digitising European Industry" Stakeholder Forum, 01 February 2017, Essen

Regional innovation strategies: the Apulian experience and the role of ARTI, the Regional Agency for Technology and Innovation

ASEAN: A Growth Centre in the Global Economy

Technology Foresight for the Region of Crete using the EASW methodology

RIS³ in the In the EU Policy Context

Brief to the. Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Dr. Eliot A. Phillipson President and CEO

BSSSC Annual Conference Resolution 2016

Funding opportunities for BigSkyEarth projects. Darko Jevremović Brno, April

Horizon Work Programme Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies - Introduction

Smart Specialisation in the Northern Netherlands

Building a shared vision: the path of Puglia Region towards a RIS3 strategy:

Linking Smart Specialization with Technology Transfer in Science and Technology Park Planning

Smart Specialisation for Regional Growth in all of the EU

Sicily towards a RIS 3 strategy. Faro, 4-5 July 2013 Giuseppe Polizzano, Sicily Region - Evaluation Unit

An introduction to the 7 th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development. Gorgias Garofalakis

Horizon Europe. #HorizonEU THE NEXT EU RESEARCH & INNOVATION PROGRAMME ( ) DG Research and Innovation September Research and Innovation

CBSME-NSR. Priority. Priority 1 Thinking Growth: Supporting growth in North Sea Region economies

An Introduction to China s Science and Technology Policy

Education and Culture

Smart Specialisation and the Budapest Manifesto

Importance of SMEs in Greening the Economy in Georgia

Key features in innovation policycomparison. Dr Gudrun Rumpf Kyiv, 9 November, 2010

FP7 Funding Opportunities for the ICT Industry

Commission proposal for Horizon Europe. #HorizonEU THE NEXT EU RESEARCH & INNOVATION PROGRAMME ( )

Research Development Request - Profile Template. European Commission

Regional Innovation Policies: System Failures, Knowledge Bases and Construction Regional Advantage

Finnish STI Policy

Terms of Reference. Call for Experts in the field of Foresight and ICT

FINLAND. The use of different types of policy instruments; and/or Attention or support given to particular S&T policy areas.

SEAS-ERA STRATEGIC FORUM

An Integrated Industrial Policy for the Globalisation Era

CHALLENGES FOR INNOVATION- BASED COMPETITIVENESS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC. Anna Kaderabkova Centre for Economic Studies VŠEM

UNIVERSITY OF ALGARVE BRIDGING INNOVATION. wwwcria.pt

Smart Specialisation Strategies methodology and the role of SMEs

Inclusively Creative

Europäischer Forschungsraum und Foresight

Urban and Regional Innovation

Zeinab El-Sadr Ministry of Scientific Research, Egypt CAASTNet Stakeholders Meeting, Dakar Senegal 25 th April 2012

DIGITAL INNOVATION HUB The strategy for digital ecosystem development and relationship model. 24 april 2017

Skånes Agro-Food Platform Policy. Lars Coenen CIRCLE Lund University

Strategic Policy Forum: A Roadmap for Digital Entrepreneurship

The transfer of S3 from the EU to Ukraine challenges and recommendations*

Puglia Region: The path towards a RIS3 strategy. Matera, 8 June 2012 Adriana Agrimi

SME support under Horizon 2020 Diana GROZAV Horizon 2020 SME NCP Center of International Projects

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FOR A FUTURE SOCIETY FOR A FUTURE SOCIETY

Minister-President of the Flemish Government and Flemish Minister for Economy, Foreign Policy, Agriculture and Rural Policy

OECD s Innovation Strategy: Key Findings and Policy Messages

Lithuania: Pramonė 4.0

Mapping of Stakeholders, Identification of Good Practices, Policy Recommendations

MARITIME CLUSTERS SUPPORTING RESEARCH & INNOVATION TO ENHANCE BLUE ECONOMY ENTREPRENEURSHIP TRIPLE HELIX MATRIX

Framework Programme 7

Transcription:

CRETE: Towards a RIS3 strategy Heraklion, Crete, 26-27 September 2013 ARTEMIS SAITAKIS DIRECTOR SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY PARK OF CRETE

Crete at a glance INTERMEDIATE LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT IN EU The region of Crete is at an intermediate level of development in EU. The per capita GDP of Crete was 85% of the average EU 27 countries taking the 170 th position in EU. Crete is part of a group of 79 regions with a GDP ranging from 80% to 99% of EU average. The Region has considerable comparative advantages which have not been transformed through policy initiatives into dynamic competitive advantages. A DYNAMIC AND BALANCED REGIONAL ECONOMY The Region of Crete has exhibited an accelerated growth rate above national average. Was 5 th in Greece in 2009 in GDP per capita. The Region has developed a more balanced structure of economic activities with considerable export and extrovert orientation. 2

Crete before the economic crisis The Region of Crete has improved its economic position within Greece in the period 2005-2009. Economic activity and employment peaked in 2008. The main expanding sectors were trade, tourism, real estate, construction and manufacturing while agriculture contracted both in terms of production and employment. Despite the rapid growth over the last decade the structure of the regional economy and especially its low competitiveness made it more susceptible to the crisis. GDP (MILLION EUROS) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 GREECE 197.645 213.207 228.180 232.920 231.642 CRETE 9.504 10.157 11.054 12.854 12.753 CRETE % GREECE 4,8% 4,8% 4,8% 5,5% 5,5% EMPLOYMENT ('000) 279,2 275,5 275,9 273,0 271,0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 3

The regional economy under strong pressure from the crisis 4

Labour Market under stress 5

Intra-regional disparities 6

Our expectations from the Peer Review Workshop Our region can benefit from the workshop by: Sharing experiences with other regions and learn from their success Refining regional innovation strategy Benchmark our approach with other successful regions How can local enterprises and other participants in the entrepreneurial process of discovery be effectively engaged in the process How SFs can be used in order to link with Horizon2020 and the innovation process 7

What other peer-regions can learn from Cretan experience Development of a strong Academic & Research landscape and infrastructures Local cuisine (Cretan diet), connection with agro-food and tourism Development of Regional Transportation Companies (maritime, airlines) 8

Questions we would like peers to discuss Within a S3 context, what particular policy actions should the Region of Crete undertake to manage the risk of weakening strategic advantage through excessive narrowing of R&D specialisation? What pre-conditions are necessary for S3 entrepreneurial activity to take place, considering also the regional cohesion goals as identified within the European context? e.g. : How do such pre-conditions differentiate themselves when applied at regions which represent different structural traits and R&D routines? (For example the case of Crete) 9

Questions we would like peers to discuss How can be achieved an effective regulation in order to ensure the correctness and legitimacy of the S3 outcome. How to avoid power interests and conflicts among different local players? Crete has a strong research capacity but the links within triple helix are very weak. ("Cretan innovation paradox"). What kind of policies and framework conditions are necessary to strengthen the links and enhance knowledge (generation, diffusion and exploitation)? How can we ensure the effectiveness of KETs (ICT etc) within a horizontal strategic context 10

Strategic vision CRETE: A DYNAMIC AND SUSTAINABLE REGION Dynamic: With an integrated exit strategy from economic crisis through investment and support of the most dynamic sectors (agro-food, tourism & culture, environment & quality of life and knowledge economy Sustainable: Environmental (protection and push forward of natural and cultural beauties) & social (inclusive growth) 11

Crete has long experience in designing and managing innovation projects Innovative Actions 2000-2006 10 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH REGIONAL INNOVATION Innovation Pole (2007-08) REGIONAL NETWORK OF TECHNOLOGY SUPPLY R&D CLUSTERS IN ICT, BIO/HEALTH RITTS (1997-2000) INNOVATION STRATEGY INNOVATION OBSERVATORY REGIONAL VC FUND FOR SPIN OFF CREATION REGIONAL TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS SPIN OFF CREATION INNOVATION MANAGEMENT INNOVATION IN TOURISM AND ICT ECO INNOVATION STUDENT ENTREPRENEURSHIP GROWTH AND JOBS CRETE: REGION OF KNOWLEDGE RESEARCH IN AGROFOOD BIO HEALTH INNOVATION POLE RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES STRUCTURAL FUNDS (2000-2006) Vorwettbewerbliche Forschung BUSINESS & Entwicklung SUPPORT ICT AND TELEMATICS REGION OF ECONOMIC CHANGE TOURISM AND SERVICES INTERNATIONAL FOCUS BUSINESS SUPPORT RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES

Governance: Role of partners MINISTRY OF DEVELOPMENT, GSRT: FRAMEWORK, MONITORING REGION OF CRETE Working Group for the preparation of S3 Regional Council approval Region of Crete: Implementation REGIONAL INNOVATION COUNCIL OF CRETE Active Participation in the process Proposals through its WGs Consultation and evaluation ACADEMIC & RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY PARK Active participation in the process Most important knowledge creator Diffusion of innovation PRODUCTION SYSTEM, BUSINESS, SOCIAL PARTNERS Active participation in the process Design of investment initiatives Proposals for improvement 13

Governance Other Ministries Ministry of Development Ministry of Education GSRT Regional Innovation Council Region of Crete Task Force on S3 Regional Council Financial Institutions Chamber of Commerce Academic & Research Inst. Public Sector Professional Associations S3 DESIGN PROCESS 14

SWOT ANALYSIS STRENGHTS Environmental conditions: Excellent climate and impressive natural beauties Cradle of an old civilization with monuments scattered around the island Internationally recognised cultural presence (El Greco, Nikos Kazantzakis, etc) Safe and established tourism destination Adequate air and sea connection with many destinations all over year Presence of large tourism and transport enterprises Emerging new economic sectors (e.g. Renewable Energies) Long term and established interregional collaborations Quality agricultural products - well known traditional Cretan diet Extrovert businesses Mature environment for the exploitation of innovative technologies Important infrastructures in the area of information/knowledge society High level academic and research infrastructures with capabilities to develop and diffuse innovation internationally 15

SWOT ANALYSIS WEAKNESSES Small number of spin-offs and start ups, seed capital mechanisms Family based, low innovative enterprises, in traditional sectors Complicated legal framework and bureaucracy Limited power of the regional government. Concentrated and bureaucratic state. Very low industrial and productive activity, focused only in traditional sectors High transportation cost as an insular region Very limited investments in generic infrastructures during the last 35 years Inadequate environmental conscience and lack of effective planning Lack of specialisation strategies Failure of systematic collaboration and coordination between academia and local industry Low demand in innovative technologies particularly from the agricultural and tourism sectors Limited use of e-services High dependency of entrepreneurs on state grants 16

SWOT ANALYSIS OPPORTUNITIES Development of new infrastructures with regional added value (new airport in Kastelli, national road, infrastructures for environmental protection) New business activities based on the rich natural environment, sustainable development and support for the enhancement and promotion of cultural heritage (world reference centre for the Minoan civilization) Opportunities for the development of alternative tourism (medical, conference etc). Opportunities from the new programming period programmes 2014-2020 and Horizon 2020. Collaboration of local businesses with research and academic institutions, introduction of innovative ICT technologies with strong impact on the emerging economic sectors in the region. Exploitation of ICT technologies for upgrading of local businesses and diffusion of new innovative management practices (Primary and Tertiary sectors) Development of stronger linkages between the primary and the tertiary sectors through information society Collaboration of regional stakeholders through the Regional Innovation Council 17

SWOT ANALYSIS THREATS Long and ongoing financial crisis Delays in administrative & civil service reform Increased researchers disappointment within the research community Strong competition in the research area Interconnectedness and continuity with R&TD projects and programmes Low investment in hi-tech from local SMEs Limited/untargeted training in human resources Low entrepreneurial activity 18

Specialization of Crete 12,00 VEGETABLES; 9,78 10,00 8,00 CAR RENTAL; 7,12 6,00 4,00 2,00 0,00 0 5 10 15 20-2,00 19

Specialization of Crete 20

Scientific publications in international journals: Crete 21

Looking beyond the region s boundaries A long mutual learning process During the last 20 years the region participated in a high number of RTDI projects with other European regions (Framework programmes for research, interregional and international cooperation, Regions of Knowledge etc) Border regions Other Greek regions Regions from other EU Member States Strong cooperation with other insular regions in traditional as well as new and emerging sectors 22

Entrepreneurial dynamics Assessing entrepreneurial dynamics in the region: «Entrepreneurial dynamics» is understood as a creative combination of knowledge to generate new market activity contributing to a specialized diversification Strong potentials for entrepreneurial discovery in several sectors plus «hidden innovators» Involvement of entrepreneurial actors in the region: Participation of the business and academic/research community in the development of the region s RIS3 is very active The most relevant bottlenecks to participation and collaboration are potential conflicts of interest as well as limited intersectoral cooperation 23

Main objectives of RIS3 Objectives are based on Analytical evidence (regional studies, regional, national statistics Support by clear stakeholder/societal needs (through consultation and long-term collaboration with the regional authorities in innovation projects) 24

Main objectives of RIS3 Elimination of the factors that make agricultural products vulnerable (packaging, quality, organic, creation of brand names) and control of factors which influence their competitiveness in the international markets Improvement of tourism services, integration with tradition and culture, use of new technologies for the augmentation of the tourism product More friendly use of energy, energy saving and elimination or energy consuming systems, exploitation of renewable energies, improvement of environmental parameters Exploitation of KETs and innovation developed by the HEIs through new investment initiatives Creation of a favourable environment for dynamic and constant collaboration among key regional players 25

Regional priorities RIS3 priorities have been chosen using the region s experience from the implementation of similar strategies, regional competitive advantages and specialization through a participatory process The priorities are based on the analysis of the region s strengths and weaknesses as well as on the potential for developing new products and services using new technologies 26

Regional priorities 27

Regional priorities SmSp sectors C ULTURAL-TOURISM COMPLEX Use of multimedia Make known & conservation of archaeological places Upgrading of services offered Development / exploitation of ICT tools High value alternative tourism ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEX Sustainable constructions Energy saving Renewable energies Smart water and wastewater management AGROFOOD COMPLEX KNOWLEDGE COMPLEX Upgrading of basic products New product development Food technology SMART SPECIALIZATION New educational services Production and promotion of exploitable knowledge Innovative entrepreneurial support HUMAN RESOURCES + COOPERATION + ENTREPRENEURSHIP + PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION + R&D + DEVELOPMENT & DIFFUCION OF ICT

Regional SmSp sectors 29

Digital Growth priorities A strategic policy framework for digital growth is planned. ICT is a horizontal priority embracing all specialization sectors Priorities are linked to the specific objectives 30

Implementation and budget Action plans are in preparation Tools for the implementation exist, but budgets are not yet finalized The strategy and its implementation will integrate and exploit the synergies between different policies and funding sources and mechanisms (national funds, ERSF, private etc) Discussion with regional stakeholders and partners involved in the implementation stage of RIS3 RIS3 will stimulate private R&D+I investments through the entrepreneurial process of discovery Responsibility for the implementation is still under question 31

Measuring progress Mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating the implementation of the strategy are still under question, depending on the schedule (decision by the central government) Ongoing work regarding performance and impact indicators Evaluation outcomes will be the basis for re-designing the strategy 32

Crete self-assessment wheel Driving economic change through smart specialisation/ris3 Informal assessment - Region of CRETE 5 4 3 2 1 0 33 Source: S3 Platform/EURADA

Summary and next steps Main challenges and success criteria Development of new jobs, retain of graduates and brain gain Development of new quality products /new brand names, further exploitation of accumulated knowledge towards a knowledge based economy Exploitation of the competitive advantages of the local cuisine and agro-food sector and integration of local products with tourism Enhance intersectoral collaboration 34

Summary and next steps Awareness of regional stakeholders Ongoing process Creating awareness is a time consuming process Need to persuade the central administration in order to trust the regional government s ability to undertake and implement the regional innovation strategy 35

Next steps: Conditions for successful implementation of S3 36

Questions to discuss with the peers QUESTION 1 Within a S3 context, what particular policy actions should the Region of Crete undertake to manage the risk of weakening strategic advantage through excessive narrowing of R&D specialisation? Sustain a certain level of related variety, in order to avoid lockin situations and ensure that new industries can be created Do not restrict the creation and distribution of multidisciplinary knowledge S3 caries policy risks from a strictly narrow specialisation and outlines the danger of leading to suboptimal policy implications and outcomes. Necessary actions and measures to avoid weakening of strategic advantage 37

Questions to discuss with the peers QUESTION 2 What pre-conditions are necessary for S3 entrepreneurial activity to take place, considering also the regional cohesion goals as identified within the European context? e.g.: How do such pre-conditions differentiate themselves when applied at regions which represent different structural traits and R&D routines? (For example the case of Crete) Pre-conditions for S3 in moderate regions Cohesion policy in line with regional innovation policy, link with Horizon2020 Role of enterprises and professional associations 38

Questions to discuss with the peers QUESTION 3 How can be achieved an effective regulation in order to ensure the correctness and legitimacy of the S3 outcome. How to avoid power interests and conflicts among different local players? Mechanisms to be placed to avoid picking winners/regional champions How to improve collaboration and develop new schemes Monitoring mechanisms Impact assessment justification 39

Questions to discuss with the peers QUESTION 4 Crete has a strong research capacity but the links within triple helix are very weak. ("Cretan innovation paradox"). What kind of policies and framework conditions are necessary to strengthen the links and enhance knowledge generation, diffusion and exploitation? Strong research capabilities, top level HEIs, very weak links with the productive system, how to improve the regional absorptive capacity Framework not friendly How to build and foster international collaborations within S3 context 40

Questions to discuss with the peers QUESTION 5 How can we ensure the effectiveness of KETs (ICT etc) within a horizontal strategic context ICT is a horizontal priority how to ensure the diffusion in the selected priority sectors How to exploit and diffuse KETs to provide Crete with an interregional comparative advantage No experience on KETs, associated risk, management of generated potential 41