Dynamic Optimization. Assignment 1. Sasanka Nagavalli January 29, 2013 Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University

Similar documents
To: Professor Avitabile Date: February 4, 2003 From: Mechanical Student Subject: Experiment #1 Numerical Methods Using Excel

NETWORK 2001 Transportation Planning Under Multiple Objectives

Calculation of the received voltage due to the radiation from multiple co-frequency sources

A Comparison of Two Equivalent Real Formulations for Complex-Valued Linear Systems Part 2: Results

Networks. Backpropagation. Backpropagation. Introduction to. Backpropagation Network training. Backpropagation Learning Details 1.04.

Fall 2018 #11 Games and Nimbers. A. Game. 0.5 seconds, 64 megabytes

Network Reconfiguration in Distribution Systems Using a Modified TS Algorithm

Priority based Dynamic Multiple Robot Path Planning

PRACTICAL, COMPUTATION EFFICIENT HIGH-ORDER NEURAL NETWORK FOR ROTATION AND SHIFT INVARIANT PATTERN RECOGNITION. Evgeny Artyomov and Orly Yadid-Pecht

A MODIFIED DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION ALGORITHM IN SPARSE LINEAR ANTENNA ARRAY SYNTHESIS

Joint Adaptive Modulation and Power Allocation in Cognitive Radio Networks

ANNUAL OF NAVIGATION 11/2006

PRO- CRIMPER* III Hand Crimping

Optimal Placement of PMU and RTU by Hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Simulated Annealing for Multiarea Power System State Estimation

PRO- CRIMPER* III Hand

PRO- CRIMPER* III Hand

PRO-CRIMPER* III Hand Tool Assembly with Die Assembly

PRO-CRIMPER* III Hand Crimping Tool Assembly with Die AssemblY

EE 508 Lecture 6. Degrees of Freedom The Approximation Problem

PRO- CRIMPER III Hand Crimping Tool Assembly DESCRIPTION (Figures 1 and 2)

onlinecomponents.com

PRO- CRIMPER* III Hand Crimping

PRO- CRIMPER* III Hand Crimping

DIRECT collocation methods for solving a continuous

Optimal Allocation of Static VAr Compensator for Active Power Loss Reduction by Different Decision Variables

A Simple Satellite Exclusion Algorithm for Advanced RAIM

PRO- CRIMPER III Hand Crimping Tool Assembly INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL OF DIE SET AND LOCATOR ASSEMBLY (Figure 2)

Optimal Sizing and Allocation of Residential Photovoltaic Panels in a Distribution Network for Ancillary Services Application

Industrial Robots used in Forges Applications

PRO- CRIMPER* III Hand

Investigation of Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization Methods for Solving Transient-Stability Constrained Optimal Power Flow Problems

The Spectrum Sharing in Cognitive Radio Networks Based on Competitive Price Game

PRO-CRIMPER* III Hand. with Die Assembly OCT 11 Rev C. Pivot Pin. Die Assembly Moving Jaw CONTACT FAMILY SIZE (AWG)

Define Y = # of mobiles from M total mobiles that have an adequate link. Measure of average portion of mobiles allocated a link of adequate quality.

Allocation of capacitor banks in distribution systems using multi-objective function

Queen Bee genetic optimization of an heuristic based fuzzy control scheme for a mobile robot 1

A study of turbo codes for multilevel modulations in Gaussian and mobile channels

Application of Intelligent Voltage Control System to Korean Power Systems

PRO-CRIMPER* III Hand Crimping Tool Assembly with Die Assembly

Th P5 13 Elastic Envelope Inversion SUMMARY. J.R. Luo* (Xi'an Jiaotong University), R.S. Wu (UC Santa Cruz) & J.H. Gao (Xi'an Jiaotong University)

aperture David Makovoz, 30/01/2006 Version 1.0 Table of Contents

INITIALIZATION OF ROBOTIC FORMATIONS USING DISCRETE PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION

Figure 1. DC-DC Boost Converter

A NSGA-II algorithm to solve a bi-objective optimization of the redundancy allocation problem for series-parallel systems

High Speed, Low Power And Area Efficient Carry-Select Adder

problems palette of David Rock and Mary K. Porter 6. A local musician comes to your school to give a performance

Autonomous Dynamic Spectrum Management for Coexistence of Multiple Cognitive Tactical Radio Networks

Ergodic Capacity of Block-Fading Gaussian Broadcast and Multi-access Channels for Single-User-Selection and Constant-Power

Piecewise Linear Approximation of Generators Cost Functions Using Max-Affine Functions

Walsh Function Based Synthesis Method of PWM Pattern for Full-Bridge Inverter

Target Response Adaptation for Correlation Filter Tracking

Figure 1. DC-DC Boost Converter

A GBAS Testbed to Support New Monitoring Algorithms Development for CAT III Precision Approach

RC Filters TEP Related Topics Principle Equipment

Comparative Analysis of Reuse 1 and 3 in Cellular Network Based On SIR Distribution and Rate

Cooperative perimeter surveillance with a team of mobile robots under communication constraints

A Preliminary Study on Targets Association Algorithm of Radar and AIS Using BP Neural Network

GP-based Design and Optimization of a Floating Voltage Source for Low-Power and Highly Tunable OTA Applications

Discussion on How to Express a Regional GPS Solution in the ITRF

Coverage Maximization in Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks Utilizing Immune Node Deployment Algorithm

Coordinating the Motions of Multiple Robots with Specified Trajectories

The Synthesis of Dependable Communication Networks for Automotive Systems

CS345a: Data Mining Jure Leskovec and Anand Rajaraman Stanford University

ADAPT: Design assistance for iterative analog synthesis

Mooring Cost Sensitivity Study Based on Cost-Optimum Mooring Design

Location of Rescue Helicopters in South Tyrol

Selective Harmonic Mitigation Technique for Cascaded H-Bridge Converters with Equal DC Link Voltages

Particle Filters. Ioannis Rekleitis

White Paper. OptiRamp Model-Based Multivariable Predictive Control. Advanced Methodology for Intelligent Control Actions

Kinematics of a dedicated 6DOF Robot for Tele-echography

Profile Optimization of Satellite Antenna for Angular Jerk Minimization

Cloud of Things for Sensing-as-a-Service: Architecture, Algorithms, and Use Case

MODEL ORDER REDUCTION AND CONTROLLER DESIGN OF DISCRETE SYSTEM EMPLOYING REAL CODED GENETIC ALGORITHM J. S. Yadav, N. P. Patidar, J.

Lifetime-Oriented Optimal Relay Deployment for Three-tier Wireless Sensor Networks

current activity shows on the top right corner in green. The steps appear in yellow

Research of Dispatching Method in Elevator Group Control System Based on Fuzzy Neural Network. Yufeng Dai a, Yun Du b

Instruction Sheet AMPMODU* MTE CONNECTORS Mar 11 Rev A

CHAPTER 29 AN EXAMPLE OF THE MONTECARLO SIMULATIONS: THE LANGEVIN DYNAMICS

Voronoi coverage of non-convex environments with a group of networked robots

ESTIMATION OF DIVERGENCES IN PRECAST CONSTRUCTIONS USING GEODETIC CONTROL NETWORKS

Decision aid methodologies in transportation

Chapter 2 Two-Degree-of-Freedom PID Controllers Structures

Multiband Jamming Strategies with Minimum Rate Constraints

PRO-CRIMPER* III Hand Crimping Tool Assembly and Die Assemblies [ ]

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Proprietary Page 1

antenna antenna (4.139)

Uncertainty in measurements of power and energy on power networks

A PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION FOR REACTIVE POWER AND VOLTAGE CONTROL CONSIDERING VOLTAGE SECURITY ASSESSMENT

FEATURE SELECTION FOR SMALL-SIGNAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

Inverse Halftoning Method Using Pattern Substitution Based Data Hiding Scheme

Adaptive Modulation for Multiple Antenna Channels

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF THREE ALGORITHMS FOR TWO-CHANNEL SINEWAVE PARAMETER ESTIMATION: SEVEN PARAMETER SINE FIT, ELLIPSE FIT, SPECTRAL SINC FIT

POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY Electrical Engineering Department. EE SOPHOMORE LABORATORY Experiment 1 Laboratory Energy Sources

sensors ISSN

Controlled Random Search Optimization For Linear Antenna Arrays

A MODIFIED DIRECTIONAL FREQUENCY REUSE PLAN BASED ON CHANNEL ALTERNATION AND ROTATION

Optimum Allocation of Distributed Generations Based on Evolutionary Programming for Loss Reduction and Voltage Profile Correction

MTBF PREDICTION REPORT

Decomposition Principles and Online Learning in Cross-Layer Optimization for Delay-Sensitive Applications

Customer witness testing guide

Transcription:

Dynamc Optmzaton Assgnment 1 Sasanka Nagavall snagaval@andrew.cmu.edu 16-745 January 29, 213 Robotcs Insttute Carnege Mellon Unversty

Table of Contents 1. Problem and Approach... 1 2. Optmzaton wthout Analytcal Dervatves... 1 3. Optmzaton wth Analytcal Dervatves... 6 4. References... 12

1. Problem and Approach Consder a stuaton where a humanod robot s requred to move one of ts jonts (e.g. ts hand) to a specfc locaton wthout fallng over or movng ts feet. If the model of the robot s known (.e. the knematc chan contanng the connectvty, ntal poses, and lmts of jonts and lnks s gven), ths problem can be formulated as the followng constraned nonlnear optmzaton problem. arg mn x f x subject to c eq x c x x f : c : c eq : n n n n p q The soluton to the problem above s the value of the vector varable x that mnmzes the objectve functon. In ths assgnment, the focus wll be on formulatng the problem by specfyng the approprate objectve functon f c x and the equalty constrant functon fmncon solver [1]. ceq 2. Optmzaton wthout Analytcal Dervatves x, the nequalty constrant functon x. The problem wll then be solved for x usng Matlab s Please see the provded drc.m scrpt for a tree structure defnng the knematc chan of the humanod robot. Snce the goal s to place the specfed jont at the specfed locaton, the objectve functon may be set to the Eucldean dstance between the jont s poston and the goal poston. The Eucldean dstance s a good choce for an objectve functon because t has a well-defned mnmum value (.e. ) and the goal s clearly acheved whenever the functon s mnmzed though addtonal effort may be requred to also satsfy the constrants. Whle the goal poston P goal s fxed, the jont poston P s a functon of the robot s jont angles,,, jont and t can be 1 2 28 determned by applyng forward knematcs to the robot s knematc chan. The vector of jont angles that mnmzes the value of the objectve functon s the soluton to the problem. f,,, P,,, P 1 2 28 jont 1 2 28 Snce the robot must not move ts feet, the equalty constrant may be smlarly defned n terms of the Eucldean dstance between each foot jont s poston and ts ntal poston. Ths equalty constrant s satsfed when both of these dstances are. goal 1

c,,, 1 2 28 P P,,, lfoot _ jont 1 2 28 lfoot _ ntal,,, rfoot _ jont 1 2 28 rfoot _ ntal P P The fnal condton that the robot must not fall over can be specfed n terms of the nequalty constrant usng the robot s center of mass. The robot has a base of support that can be estmated by the poston and sze of ts feet. The base of support defnes a two dmensonal regon on the ground beneath the robot such that f the robot s projected center of mass les wthn the regon, the robot wll not fall over. If the robot s projected center of mass les outsde the regon, the robot wll fall over. By crudely estmatng ths regon wth a rectangle of gven dmensons ( C lmt ) centered on the orgn, the nequalty constrant may be specfed by the followng functon. Crobot, x 1, 2,, 28 Clmt, x Crobot, y 1, 2,, 28 Clmt, y c1, 2,, 28 Crobot, x 1, 2,, 28 Clmt, x Crobot, y 1, 2,, 28 Clmt, y Please see sasanka_objectve.m for a Matlab functon that mplements the objectve functon f,,, defned above. 1 2 28 Please see sasanka_constrants.m for a Matlab functon that mplements both the nequalty constrant c,,, and equalty constrant c,,, functons defned above. 1 2 28 eq 1 2 28 Please see q1.m for a Matlab scrpt that uses fmncon to solve ths nonlnear optmzaton problem. Note that the scrpt also specfes upper and lower bounds on the jont angles as parameters to fmncon to lmt the angles to wthn the jont lmts. These jont lmts could also easly have been specfed as addtonal nonlnear constrants, but n mplementaton, t appears to be more effcent to specfy them separately to fmncon. The fgures below show the ntal pose and a varety of dfferent poses obtaned as solutons to the nonlnear optmzaton problem when the specfed jont s the rght hand and goal poston s as ndcated on the fgure. 2

Fgure 1 - Intal Robot Pose Fgure 2 - Robot Reaches for (,,) wth Rght Hand 3

Fgure 3 - Robot Reaches for (1,,.5) wth Rght Hand Fgure 4 - Robot Reaches for (1,1,) wth Rght Hand 4

Fgure 5 - Robot Reaches for (-.5,-.5,1) Fgure 6 - Robot Reaches for (,,1.5) wth Rght Hand 5

Please see Appendx A1 to Appendx A5 for the output correspondng to the above fgures. Of the postons tested, the only poston that the robot could not reach wth ts rght hand was (1,1,) whch s a pont on the ground one meter n front and one meter to the left of the robot. In ths stuaton, the solver found a local mnmum for the optmzaton functon that satsfed the constrants, but ths mnmum s far from the desred value of. 3. Optmzaton wth Analytcal Dervatves The optmzaton method descrbed above can be extended to nclude the computaton of exact gradents through the use of analytcal dervatves. Theoretcally, ths should result n faster convergence on the soluton to the optmzaton problem because there s no error n the computed gradent of the objectve functon or the constrant functons. These exact gradents can be provded to fmncon as extra output arguments n the objectve and constrant functons and by settng the GradObj and GradConstr optons to on [1]. The gradents of the objectve functon and constrant functons may be obtaned through applcaton of the chan rule. f,,, P,,, P c eq 1 2 28 jont 1 2 28 T 1, 2,, 28,,, P f Pjont Pgoal Pjont,,, P,,,,,, 1 2 28 jont 1 2 28 goal 1 2 28 1 2 28 c eq,,, 1 2 28 P P,,, goal lfoot _ jont 1 2 28 lfoot _ ntal,,, P P rfoot _ jont 1 2 28 rfoot _ ntal T Plfoot _ jont 1, 2,, 28 Plfoot _ ntal Plfoot _ jont Plfoot _ jont 1, 2,, 28 P lfoot _ ntal 1, 2,, 28 Prfoot _ jont 1 2 28 Prfoot _ ntal Prfoot _ jont Prfoot _ jont 1 2 28 rfoot _ ntal T,,,,,, P 1, 2,, 28 6

c,,, 1 2 28 c,,, 1 2 28 C,,, C,,, C,,, C,,, Crobot, x 1, 2,, 28 C robot, y 1, 2,, 28 C robot, x 1, 2,, 28 Crobot, y 1, 2,, 28 C robot, x 1 2 28 lmt, x C robot, y 1 2 28 lmt, y C robot, x 1 2 28 lmt, x C robot, y 1 2 28 lmt, y It s clear that n order to compute the dervatves of the objectve and constrant functons, one must frst compute the dervatves of the poston of every jont and the dervatves of the centerof-mass of the robot. In a robot wth 28 jonts and lnks, ths appears to be an enormous amount of computaton. However, the computaton may be sgnfcantly smplfed by consderng the followng. Gven a knematc chan wth n jonts and lnks, jont offsets d1, d2,, d n, lnk center-of-mass offsets 1, 2,, n compute the jont postons P, lnk orentatons followng recursve update rule. t t t and a vector of jont angles 1, 2,, n, t s possble to K, and lnk center-of-masses Q va the P P K d parent ( ) parent ( ) K K R parent () Q P K t The recursve update rule gven above captures the forward knematcs of the knematc chan and only requres that the root jont s poston P and the root lnk s orentaton K be specfed. By the takng the dervatves of the equatons above, a smlar update rule may be specfed to propagate the dervatves of the jont postons, lnk orentatons and lnk center-of-masses. Assume that the jonts and lnks are numbered such that parent (). 7

P P K j j j K j K j parent ( ) parent ( ) K parent () j j parent () Q P K t j j j R j d j j R j Please see drc_forward_knematcs2.m for a modfed verson of the forward knematcs functon that also computes the gradents usng the update rules above. The dervatve of the robot s center-of-mass s also easly computed once the dervatves of every lnk s center-of-mass have been computed. mq C m C j Q m Please see sasanka_objectve2.m for a Matlab functon that mplements the objectve functon f f 1, 2,, 28 and ts gradent.,,, 1 2 28 Please see sasanka_constrants2.m for a Matlab functon that mplements both the nequalty constrant c1, 2,, 28 and equalty constrant ceq 1, 2,, 28 functons and ther gradents c c eq and. A sngle modfcaton was made to the equatons above n,,,,,, 1 2 28 1 2 28 mplementaton and that was to modfy the equalty constrants to avod dvson, whch was causng a dvson-by-zero error when the jont angles dd not cause any movement n the feet of the robot. m j 8

Fgure 7 - Intal Robot Pose Fgure 8 - Robot Reaches for (,,) wth Rght Hand - Analytcal Gradent 9

Fgure 9 - Robot Reaches for (1,,.5) wth Rght Hand - Analytcal Gradent Fgure 1 - Robot Reaches for (1,1,) wth Rght Hand - Analytcal Gradent 1

Fgure 11 - Robot Reaches for (-.5,.5,1) wth Rght Hand - Analytcal Gradent Fgure 12 - Robot Reaches for (,,1.5) wth Rght Hand - Analytcal Gradent 11

Please see Appendx B1 to Appendx B5 for the output correspondng to the above fgures. The results appear to place the robot n more convoluted poses than those obtaned wthout the analytcal gradents. In most cases, the fnal poston of the jont was closer to the goal poston than wthout analytcal gradents. 4. References [1] MathWorks, "Fnd mnmum of constraned nonlnear multvarable functon - MATLAB," 212. [Onlne]. Avalable: http://www.mathworks.com/help/optm/ug/fmncon.html. [Accessed 26 January 213]. 12

Appendx A1 Robot Reaches for (,,) wth Rght Hand Local mnmum possble. Constrants satsfed. fmncon stopped because the sze of the current step s less than the default value of the step sze tolerance and constrants are satsfed to wthn the default value of the constrant tolerance. <stoppng crtera detals> Jont angles, lower lmts, upper lmts (radans): -.1553 -.436.436.545 -.698.698.218 2.45-1.6342-1.75.524 -.2174 -.47.495.1755 -.32 1.14.3389 -.619.619 1.2211-1.2 1.28 -.3967 -.798.798.2493 -.619 1.1345.1236-1.14.32.243 -.495.47-1.658-1.745.524.1496 2.45.26 -.698.698 -.14 -.436.436 -.145-1.9635 1.9635 -.222-1.3963 1.7453 1.7129 3.1416 1.2118 2.3562.16-1.571 1.571.5732 -.436 1.571 1.2532-1.9635 1.9635 -.1953-1.7453 1.3963 1.549 3.1416 -.4241-2.3562.125-1.571 1.571 -.5725-1.571.436 Fnal postons of statonary jonts and goal jont (xyz, meters): -.484.89.811 -.484 -.89.811 Jont 29: 1.e-8 * -.2253 -.1794 -.6632 Center of mass of robot (xyz, meters):.1.35.6647 Dsplacement of statonary jonts (meters): 3.6379e-8 Dstance from goal poston (meters): 7.231e-9 13

Appendx A2 Robot Reaches for (1,,.5) wth Rght Hand Local mnmum possble. Constrants satsfed. fmncon stopped because the sze of the current step s less than the default value of the step sze tolerance and constrants are satsfed to wthn the default value of the constrant tolerance. <stoppng crtera detals> Jont angles, lower lmts, upper lmts (radans): -.1371 -.436.436 -.884 -.698.698.2751 2.45-1.4185-1.75.524.186 -.47.495.423 -.32 1.14.123 -.619.619.847-1.2 1.28 -.686 -.798.798.2459 -.619 1.1345 -.66-1.14.32.3866 -.495.47-1.4297-1.745.524.4217 2.45.348 -.698.698 -.32 -.436.436 -.2615-1.9635 1.9635 -.5679-1.3963 1.7453 1.818 3.1416.748 2.3562.293-1.571 1.571.4363 -.436 1.571 -.4118-1.9635 1.9635 -.6149-1.7453 1.3963 1.638 3.1416 -.2724-2.3562.59-1.571 1.571 -.7594-1.571.436 Fnal postons of statonary jonts and goal jont (xyz, meters): -.484.89.811 -.484 -.89.811 Jont 29: 1. -..5 Center of mass of robot (xyz, meters):.144.269.7378 Dsplacement of statonary jonts (meters): 1.4334e-8 Dstance from goal poston (meters): 3.257e-7 14

Appendx A3 Robot Reaches for (1,1,) wth Rght Hand Local mnmum possble. Constrants satsfed. fmncon stopped because the sze of the current step s less than the default value of the step sze tolerance and constrants are satsfed to wthn the default value of the constrant tolerance. <stoppng crtera detals> Jont angles, lower lmts, upper lmts (radans): -.831 -.436.436 -.398 -.698.698.6782 2.45-1.4945-1.75.524.4479 -.47.495 -.185 -.32 1.14.3886 -.619.619 1.1321-1.2 1.28 -.722 -.798.798.2599 -.619 1.1345 -.124-1.14.32.327 -.495.47-1.427-1.745.524.695 2.45.534 -.698.698 -.175 -.436.436 -.5246-1.9635 1.9635 -.7265-1.3963 1.7453 1.835 3.1416.5634 2.3562.128-1.571 1.571.3745 -.436 1.571 -.4251-1.9635 1.9635 -.7481-1.7453 1.3963 1.437 3.1416 -.1794-2.3562.249-1.571 1.571 -.873-1.571.436 Fnal postons of statonary jonts and goal jont (xyz, meters): -.484.89.811 -.484 -.89.811 Jont 29:.6884.6355.382 Center of mass of robot (xyz, meters):.1461.1258.7125 Dsplacement of statonary jonts (meters): 1.9854e-8 Dstance from goal poston (meters):.571 15

Appendx A4 Robot Reaches for (-.5,-.5,1) wth Rght Hand Local mnmum possble. Constrants satsfed. fmncon stopped because the sze of the current step s less than the default value of the step sze tolerance and constrants are satsfed to wthn the default value of the constrant tolerance. <stoppng crtera detals> Jont angles, lower lmts, upper lmts (radans):.851 -.436.436 -.421 -.698.698.8644 2.45 -.4951-1.75.524 -.167 -.47.495.4623 -.32 1.14 -.166 -.619.619.385-1.2 1.28.166 -.798.798.2628 -.619 1.1345 -.3744-1.14.32.171 -.495.47 -.6625-1.745.524.8753 2.45 -.6 -.698.698.6 -.436.436 -.664-1.9635 1.9635.1567-1.3963 1.7453 1.5776 3.1416 1.1467 2.3562.7-1.571 1.571.5613 -.436 1.571 -.5167-1.9635 1.9635.3749-1.7453 1.3963 1.8985 3.1416-1.487-2.3562.16-1.571 1.571 -.5739-1.571.436 Fnal postons of statonary jonts and goal jont (xyz, meters): -.484.89.811 -.484 -.89.811 Jont 29: -.5 -.5 1. Center of mass of robot (xyz, meters): -. -..936 Dsplacement of statonary jonts (meters): 3.2679e-8 Dstance from goal poston (meters): 3.126e-9 16

Appendx A5 Robot Reaches for (,,1.5) wth Rght Hand Local mnmum possble. Constrants satsfed. fmncon stopped because the sze of the current step s less than the default value of the step sze tolerance and constrants are satsfed to wthn the default value of the constrant tolerance. <stoppng crtera detals> Jont angles, lower lmts, upper lmts (radans): -.86 -.436.436 -.4594 -.698.698 1.3397 2.45 -.6616-1.75.524.826 -.47.495.2841 -.32 1.14.142 -.619.619.4792-1.2 1.28 -.4128 -.798.798.2652 -.619 1.1345 -.4188-1.14.32.815 -.495.47 -.6835-1.745.524 1.343 2.45 -.39 -.698.698. -.436.436 -.625-1.9635 1.9635.859-1.3963 1.7453 1.635 3.1416 1.258 2.3562.32-1.571 1.571.5639 -.436 1.571.6768-1.9635 1.9635-1.3779-1.7453 1.3963.7764 3.1416-1.8811-2.3562.176-1.571 1.571 -.575-1.571.436 Fnal postons of statonary jonts and goal jont (xyz, meters): -.484.89.811 -.484 -.89.811 Jont 29:. -. 1.5 Center of mass of robot (xyz, meters): -.479.19.8738 Dsplacement of statonary jonts (meters): 6.177e-9 Dstance from goal poston (meters): 5.1267e-8 17

Appendx B1 Robot Reaches for (,,) wth Rght Hand Solver stopped prematurely. fmncon stopped because t exceeded the teraton lmt, optons.maxiter = 1 (the default value). Jont angles, lower lmts, upper lmts (radans): -.828 -.436.436 -.5568 -.698.698 2.745 2.45-1.691-1.75.524 -.369 -.47.495 -.263 -.32 1.14.3899 -.619.619 1.2172-1.2 1.28.7282 -.798.798.2411 -.619 1.1345 -.93-1.14.32 -.4489 -.495.47-1.6921-1.745.524 2.3192 2.45.5 -.698.698.1 -.436.436 -.357-1.9635 1.9635.1668-1.3963 1.7453 1.548 3.1416 1.1769 2.3562 -.1-1.571 1.571.5453 -.436 1.571 1.1525-1.9635 1.9635.8176-1.7453 1.3963 1.7354 3.1416 -.2918-2.3562.2-1.571 1.571 -.5449-1.571.436 Fnal postons of statonary jonts and goal jont (xyz, meters): -.484.89.811 -.485 -.888.89 Jont 29: 1.e-5 *.318 -.785.1123 Center of mass of robot (xyz, meters):.187 -.56.533 Dsplacement of statonary jonts (meters): 2.645e-4 Dstance from goal poston (meters): 1.467e-6 18

Appendx B2 Robot Reaches for (1,,.5) wth Rght Hand Local mnmum possble. Constrants satsfed. fmncon stopped because the sze of the current step s less than the default value of the step sze tolerance and constrants are satsfed to wthn the default value of the constrant tolerance. <stoppng crtera detals> Jont angles, lower lmts, upper lmts (radans): -.1372 -.436.436 -.914 -.698.698.3117 2.45-1.4673-1.75.524.2838 -.47.495.37 -.32 1.14.37 -.619.619.837-1.2 1.28 -.628 -.798.798.252 -.619 1.1345.244-1.14.32.2233 -.495.47-1.4771-1.745.524.4329 2.45.451 -.698.698 -.1 -.436.436 -.3125-1.9635 1.9635 -.4198-1.3963 1.7453 1.7599 3.1416.7771 2.3562.238-1.571 1.571.4663 -.436 1.571 -.4495-1.9635 1.9635 -.68-1.7453 1.3963 1.51 3.1416 -.2871-2.3562 -.24-1.571 1.571 -.6929-1.571.436 Fnal postons of statonary jonts and goal jont (xyz, meters): -.484.89.811 -.485 -.89.89 Jont 29: 1. -..5 Center of mass of robot (xyz, meters):.1413.366.7219 Dsplacement of statonary jonts (meters): 2.1883e-4 Dstance from goal poston (meters): 7.5372e-6 19

Appendx B3 Robot Reaches for (1,1,) wth Rght Hand Local mnmum possble. Constrants satsfed. fmncon stopped because the sze of the current step s less than the default value of the step sze tolerance and constrants are satsfed to wthn the default value of the constrant tolerance. <stoppng crtera detals> Jont angles, lower lmts, upper lmts (radans): -.747 -.436.436 -.6968 -.698.698 1.3189 2.45-1.7473-1.75.524.4913 -.47.495 -.3157 -.32 1.14.233 -.619.619 1.1382-1.2 1.28 -.7857 -.798.798 -.4597 -.619 1.1345 -.3438-1.14.32.466 -.495.47-1.5976-1.745.524 1.3492 2.45.4418 -.698.698 -.2598 -.436.436 -.5993-1.9635 1.9635 -.975-1.3963 1.7453 1.7355 3.1416.1869 2.3562.178-1.571 1.571 -.141 -.436 1.571 -.3924-1.9635 1.9635 -.7351-1.7453 1.3963 1.5113 3.1416 -.714-2.3562.882-1.571 1.571-1.4929-1.571.436 Fnal postons of statonary jonts and goal jont (xyz, meters): -.484.89.811 -.486 -.892.81 Jont 29:.777.67.2523 Center of mass of robot (xyz, meters):.157.138.6185 Dsplacement of statonary jonts (meters): 2.9485e-4 Dstance from goal poston (meters):.579 2

Appendx B4 Robot Reaches for (-.5,-.5,1) wth Rght Hand Local mnmum possble. Constrants satsfed. fmncon stopped because the sze of the current step s less than the default value of the step sze tolerance and constrants are satsfed to wthn the default value of the constrant tolerance. <stoppng crtera detals> Jont angles, lower lmts, upper lmts (radans):.66 -.436.436 -.3899 -.698.698.8888 2.45 -.565-1.75.524 -.874 -.47.495.4528 -.32 1.14 -.898 -.619.619.255-1.2 1.28.115 -.798.798.2628 -.619 1.1345 -.3811-1.14.32.275 -.495.47 -.665-1.745.524.965 2.45 -.6 -.698.698.3 -.436.436 -.93-1.9635 1.9635.1717-1.3963 1.7453 1.5729 3.1416 1.1645 2.3562.1-1.571 1.571.5654 -.436 1.571 -.5676-1.9635 1.9635.416-1.7453 1.3963 1.9839 3.1416-1.1862-2.3562 -.1-1.571 1.571 -.576-1.571.436 Fnal postons of statonary jonts and goal jont (xyz, meters): -.484.89.811 -.484 -.89.811 Jont 29: -.5 -.5 1. Center of mass of robot (xyz, meters): -.356 -.41.9392 Dsplacement of statonary jonts (meters): 3.84e-5 Dstance from goal poston (meters): 2.9162e-1 21

Appendx B5 Robot Reaches for (,,1.5) wth Rght Hand Local mnmum possble. Constrants satsfed. fmncon stopped because the sze of the current step s less than the default value of the step sze tolerance and constrants are satsfed to wthn the default value of the constrant tolerance. <stoppng crtera detals> Jont angles, lower lmts, upper lmts (radans):.671 -.436.436 -.3298 -.698.698.9892 2.45-1.1542-1.75.524 -.251 -.47.495.27 -.32 1.14 -.2332 -.619.619.867-1.2 1.28 -.327 -.798.798.2598 -.619 1.1345 -.941-1.14.32.2271 -.495.47-1.374-1.745.524.748 2.45.12 -.698.698 -.14 -.436.436 -.3252-1.9635 1.9635 -.181-1.3963 1.7453 1.715 3.1416 1.2536 2.3562.133-1.571 1.571.5748 -.436 1.571-1.6894-1.9635 1.9635.3756-1.7453 1.3963 2.6991 3.1416-1.3436-2.3562 -.155-1.571 1.571 -.5687-1.571.436 Fnal postons of statonary jonts and goal jont (xyz, meters): -.484.89.811 -.484 -.89.811 Jont 29: -. -. 1.5 Center of mass of robot (xyz, meters):.71.621.8334 Dsplacement of statonary jonts (meters): 2.117e-5 Dstance from goal poston (meters): 4.5383e-11 22