Satellite Interference: an Operator s Perspective 10 June 2013 1
Why are we here? Addressing concerns of satellite industry, policymakers and citizens Satellite Operator Mission: provide customers access to working infrastructure Provide reliable access to ensure performance, availability, sustainability Interference of all natures threatens our missions and warrantees Targeted, or Intentional interference has grown significantly over the past years 2
The causes of Interference An overview There are a variety of causes of satellite interference For the majority of cases, human error - and a consequence of the increasing number of satellites and users sharing a limited resource Poor quality or malfunctioning equipment, cabling faults, etc. contribute as well. Operator response can vary greatly depending on the nature of the interference Generally operators know what is needed, and are working on effective tools and procedures However certain types of interference are more challenging 60% 9% 8% 2% 4% 7% 11% Error Planning Error Tech Equipment ASI Shared Band Pirate Intentional
When Interference happens What do we do? Identifying the problem of interference Assessing the likely cause of the interference; the nature and content of the interfering signals Look at content of the interfered signal as a target Origin of the interference Keeping the Services running Reduce sensitivity of the satellite Increasing power levels of the transmission to overcome the interference. Engage with the ITU process Broadcaster Viewers Interferer if solution cannot be found amongst operators and/or administrations Satellite Operator
Addressing day to day interference Forums and associations to address issues: SIRG Satellite Interference Reduction Group Promote improved practices and investigate new technologies Generalised implementation of Carrier ID ETSI DVB standard SDA Satellite Data Association Rapid sharing of information amongst satellite operators GVF Global VSAT Forum Training programs to reduce human error Antenna type approvals & ESVA testing to address equipment problems Communication: Operator to Operator / Admin to Admin dialogue Response & Mitigation procedures at the Satellite Control Station. Resolve errors in pointing / frequency / polarisation / power settings Adjust / adapt transmission parameters Coordinate scheduling conflicts and accessing at incorrect times 5
Intentional interference: Very different from accidental or unintentional Does not arise from station that are planned to operate with affected satellite: transmissions are therefore unnecessary in nature Interfering transmissions specifically target the affected satellite, and more precisely, specific transponders and their respective content. Usually presents as an unmodulated carrier, and therefore does carry any identification or transmit any information Interferer transmit parameters modified in real time to counter interference mitigation efforts employed by the Operator Deduced power / antenna characteristics, together with a typically recurring site location, suggest that the interfering station is a fixed, dedicated facility i.e. not easily hidden. 6
Quantifying the Problem Cases between 2010 and 2012 rose dramatically in quantity & duration From 1,975 mins in 2010 to 142,913 mins in 2011 (75 times increase) and 329,826 mins in 2012 (more than 150 % increase from previous year) Amount of deliberate interferences (in minutes/ month) 35 745 360 49 1 360 341 84 148 23580 18749 10000 45175 30080 350 482 6420 14 0 7915 4714 41971 210 79085 80000 75000 70000 9516 605 25455 32244 16845 20801 47470 50910 65000 60000 55000 50000 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 0 5000 jan. feb. march april may june july aug. sep. oct. nov. dec. Jan. Feb. March April May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. March April May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov.* Dec. 2010 2011 2012 7
What are we doing? Raising awareness about the issue Whenever available, consistently provide precise geolocalisation and interference data to the BR and concerned Administration Provision of a detailed dossier on the subject to the RRB (Nov 12, March 13) Engaging all stakeholders - Everyone has their part: Satellite operators, Regulators, Broadcasters UN/ITU, National governments, Institutions, and civil societies Regular meetings and discussion - such as today Essential to refine processes and follow through on progress Defining and executing actions and solutions to combat problem No single answer and no one solution Need to manage expectations However a common understanding of issues and possible paths to solutions begin to emerge 8
Going forward and next steps Continue raising awareness of problem and risks Refine mechanisms to address the problem Operational and technical and solutions to improve reactivity and resiliency Document what works, what doesn t Develop an ITU process to certify the geographical origin of intentional interference Establish historical records and statistics of interference events Consider means to enhance the Effectiveness of ITU and other institutional mechanisms And workshops such as today s for next steps and further ideas! 9
Thanks 10