NASA s X2000 Program - an Institutional Approach to Enabling Smaller Spacecraft

Similar documents
Planetary CubeSats, nanosatellites and sub-spacecraft: are we all talking about the same thing?

Low-Cost Innovation in the U.S. Space Program: A Brief History

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Future Plans for the Deep Space Network (DSN)

NanoSwarm: CubeSats Enabling a Discovery Class Mission Jordi Puig-Suari Tyvak Nano-Satellite Systems

Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) Scout CubeSat Mission

Dan Dvorak and Lorraine Fesq Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. Jonathan Wilmot NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

DEEP SPACE TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Uranus Exploration Challenges

HEOMD Update NRC Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Oct. 16, 2014

MSL Lessons Learned Study. Presentation to NAC Planetary Protection Subcommittee April 29, 2013 Mark Saunders, Study Lead

The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)

On January 14, 2004, the President announced a new space exploration vision for NASA

Dr. Carl Brandon & Dr. Peter Chapin Vermont Technical College (Brandon),

In the summer of 2002, Sub-Orbital Technologies developed a low-altitude

The Use of SPARK in a Complex Spacecraft CubeSat Developer s Workshop - Copyright 2017 Carl Brandon & Peter Chapin

NASA Mars Exploration Program Update to the Planetary Science Subcommittee

A DEEP SPACE COMPANY BY A WORLD TEAM THE FED EXPRESS OF THE 21ST CENTURY TONY SPEAR OCTOBER 2007

Deep Space Communication The further you go, the harder it gets. D. Kanipe, Sept. 2013

Maturing Small Satellite Mission Capabilities at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Heading back to Mars with a thermal control system developed using NX

JPL. Heading back to Mars with thermal control system developed using NX. Aerospace. Product NX

Science Plenary II: Science Missions Enabled by Nuclear Power and Propulsion. Chair / Organizer: Steven D. Howe Center for Space Nuclear Research

Autonomous and Autonomic Systems: With Applications to NASA Intelligent Spacecraft Operations and Exploration Systems

Credits. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. United Space Alliance, LLC. John Frassanito and Associates Strategic Visualization

CubeSat Integration into the Space Situational Awareness Architecture

For Winter /12/2006

William B. Green, Danika Jensen, and Amy Culver California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109

Design and Operation of Micro-Gravity Dynamics and Controls Laboratories

The Future of the US Space Program and Educating the Next Generation Workforce. IEEE Rock River Valley Section

Technologies for Outer Solar System Exploration

Constellation Systems Division

LLCD Accomplishments No Issues with Atmospheric Effects like Fading and Turbulence. Transmitting Data at 77 Mbps < 5 above the horizon

Background for Lesson Discussion, page 122 Assembling a spacecraft model. Questions, page 127 Some familiarity with the Saturn

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

SPACOMM 2009 PANEL. Challenges and Hopes in Space Navigation and Communication: From Nano- to Macro-satellites

Tropnet: The First Large Small-Satellite Mission

Office of Chief Technologist - Space Technology Program Dr. Prasun Desai Office of the Chief Technologist May 1, 2012

Panel Session IV - Future Space Exploration

Satellite Testing. Prepared by. A.Kaviyarasu Assistant Professor Department of Aerospace Engineering Madras Institute Of Technology Chromepet, Chennai

NASA Mission Directorates

An insight in the evolution of GEO satellite technologies for broadband services

GAMMa - A modular ascender concept for sample return missions

Design of a Remote-Cockpit for small Aerospace Vehicles

Ground Systems Department

Miguel A. Aguirre. Introduction to Space. Systems. Design and Synthesis. ) Springer

The Decade of Light: Innovations in Space Communications and Navigation Technologies

A TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP TOWARDS MINERAL EXPLORATION FOR EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS IN SPACE

NASA Research Areas of Interest Released by NASA HQ February 2014

NASA TA-02 In-space Propulsion Roadmap Priorities

WHO WE ARE: Private U.S. citizens who advocate at our own expense for a bold and well-reasoned space agenda worthy of the U.S.

The PTR Group Capabilities 2014

NASA s Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Programs. May 2, 2007

The Emergence. The Strategic Importance of Spacecraft Autonomy

Cyber-Physical Systems

Key Areas for Collaboration

KNOWLEDGE ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL

The Aerospace Corporation s Concept Design Center

Overview of the Tracking and Control Center at the Tsukuba Space Center

Experiment of 348 Mbps downlink from 50-kg class satellite

JHU/APL CubeSat Initiatives. Andy Lewin 19 April 2007

Human Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity

Astronaut Edwin Buzz Aldrin climbing down the ladder of Apollo 11 and onto the surface of the Moon on July 20, (National Aeronautics

Automated Planning for Spacecraft and Mission Design

Ultra Reliability at NASA

Exploration Systems Mission Directorate: New Opportunities in the President s FY2011 Budget

AstroBus S, the high performance and competitive Small Satellites platform for Earth Observation

The Lunar Exploration Campaign

University of Kentucky Space Systems Laboratory. Jason Rexroat Space Systems Laboratory University of Kentucky

Space Systems Engineering

Benefiting government, industry and the public through innovative science and technology

On July 8th, 2011, STS 135, the final space shuttle mission, launched from the

The MARS Helicopter and Lessons for SATCOM Testing

Exploration Partnership Strategy. Marguerite Broadwell Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

Commission for Moon, Mars and Beyond

NASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report

Future DSN Capabilities

THE UW SPACE ENGINEERING & EXPLORATION PROGRAM: INVESTING IN THE FUTURE OF AERONAUTICS & ASTRONAUTICS EDUCATION AND RESEARCH

CUBESAT an OVERVIEW AEOLUS AERO TECH, Pvt. Ltd.

ESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference September Toronto, Canada

Status of Free-Space Optical Communications Program at JPL

Automation & Robotics (A&R) for Space Applications in the German Space Program

The Evolution of Nano-Satellite Proximity Operations In-Space Inspection Workshop 2017

Low-Cost Simulation and Verification Environment for Micro-Satellites

Deep Space cubesats a nanosats at JPL. Tony Freeman Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

Space Situational Awareness 2015: GPS Applications in Space

Communications in Space: A Deep Subject

SSC03-III-5. JPL University Microsatellite Program. Robert Shotwell. Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Exploration Systems Research & Technology

Achieving Science with CubeSats: Thinking Inside the Box

WHAT WILL AMERICA DO IN SPACE NOW?

Italian Space Agency perspective on Small Satellites

Space Communication and Navigation Testbed: Communications Technology for Exploration

16 Oct 2014, Estavayer-le-Lac, Switzerland. TW-1: A Cubesat constellation for space networking experiments

Small Satellites: The Execution and Launch of a GPS Radio Occultation Instrument in a 6U Nanosatellite

SPACE. (Some space topics are also listed under Mechatronic topics)

The JPL A-Team and Mission Formulation Process

Living With a Star Space Environment Testbeds

Robotics in Space. Ian Taylor MP. Co-Chair, UK Parliamentary Space Committee VIIIth European Interparliamentary Space Conference

Transcription:

NASA s X2000 Program - an Institutional Approach to Enabling Smaller Spacecraft Dr. Leslie J. Deutsch and Chris Salvo Advanced Flight Systems Program Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology David Woerner X2000 First Delivery Project Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Abstract The number of NASA science missions per year is increasing from less than one to more than six. At the same time, individual mission budgets are smaller and cannot afford their own dedicated technology developments. In response to this, NASA has formed the X2000 Program. This program, which is divided into a set of subsequent deliveries will provide the basic avionics, power, communications, and software capability for future science missions. X2000 First Delivery, which will be completed in early 2001, will provide a full-functioned one MRAD tolerant flight computer, power switching electronics, a highly efficient radioisotope power source, and a transponder that provides high-level services at both 8.4 GHz and 32 GHz bands. The X2000 Second Delivery, which will be completed in the 2003 time frame, will enable complete spacecraft in the 10-50 kg class. All capabilities delivered by the X2000 program will be commercialized within the US and therefore will be available for others to use. Although the immediate customers for these technologies are deep space missions, most of the capabilities being delivered are generic in nature and will be equally applicable to Earth Observation missions. 1. Introduction Since the robotic exploration of deep space began in the 1960s, it has been characterized by a space mission every three to five years. These were major endeavors, each with a budget of about one billion 1998 US dollars. This era gave us Voyager, Galileo, and Cassini, for example. Each of these missions had sufficient funding to develop and infuse whatever new technology was required to achieve the mission s objectives. However, because these missions came infrequently, there was little inheritance of technology from one to the next. NASA has recently embarked on an era offaster-better-cheaper missions. These missions occur much more frequently. There have been six deep space launches in the last The work described in this paper was performed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

year, for example. NASA s goal is to have an average of one launch each month. These missions, however, have much less funding - about $200M each in 1998 US dollars. The spacecraft are much smaller and carry fewer science instruments. One consequence of this is that individual missions can no longer afford large investments in technology development. Since it is exactly these new technologies that enable such missions to be accomplished at low cost, another way had to be found to infuse technology. This has led to the establishment of NASA institutional technology development programs, including the X2000 Program. 2. The X2000 Program NASA s X2000 Program was created in 1997 by the NASA Office of Space Science and is managed at NASA s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL.) The program was chartered to infuse new technologies that will enable new, lower-cost and higher performance spacecraft, particularly for the exploration of the outer planets. The X2000 program consists of two major parts: a long-term technology development effort in specific areas not covered by other NASA technology programs, and a set of deliveries of flight-qualified new technology capabilities that are ready to be used by flight missions. The long-term technology developments include the Center for Integrated Space Microsystems (CISM) [l] and the Advanced Radioisotope Power Source (ARPS) [2]. The CISM is responsible for advances in space microelectronics and advanced computing methodologies. The ARPS effort develops new power sources for deep space to replace the current Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators that are used on today s outer planet missions. The deliveries are formed approximately every three years. The output of a delivery is a set of integrated, flight-qualified, capabilities that have been commercialized. Deliveries are managed as flight projects. This means they have a well-defined set of requirements, a fixed budget, and a schedule for completion. This allows any future mission to use these capabilities in their planning and execution. 3. X2000 First Delivery Project In 1998, the X2000 Program formed its first delivery, called the First Delivery Project (FDP) [3]. FDP capabilities will be delivered in 2000. Many deep space missions that will launch in 2003 or later are planning to use capabilities from FDP. These missions include Europa Orbiter, Pluto/Kuiper Express, Solar Probe, Champollion (DS-4,) Mars Sample Return, and several Discovery class missions. Europa Orbiter and Champollion have a special relationship with X2000 FDP. Because they launch before the others, X2000 capabilities are in their critical path for development. FDP is developing an integrated set of flight avionics that will be radiation hardened to the one MRAD level. This level of radiation-hardening is required to achieve the goals of the Europa Orbiter mission [4]. A new avionics architecture has been developed that extends the personal computer revolution into space. FDP is developing a plug-and-play set of avionics slices. Each Compact Peripheral Computer Interconnect (CPCI) 160 x 100 mm slice provides some basic functionality. A spacecraft designer can mix and

match slices to provide desired system capabilities. There are slices for computer systems, long and short term memory, power management, and interfaces to spacecraft instruments. The slices can communicate with each other via standard networking protocols using either a Computer Peripheral Interconnect (PCI) or IEEE 1394 bus. As part of the FDP, a 100 million instruction-per-second (MIPS) flight computer will be developed. This will allow substantial computational capabilities in deep space for the first time. A new software architecture, called the Mission Data System (MDS) is being developed by FDP to support the new avionics [5]. The MDS will include both flight and ground software in a seamless suite. The MDS will manage spacecraft and ground systems by controlling their state. Goal-oriented commands will be sent to systems, which will be capable of determining how to modify their state to achieve these goals. Currently, in order to have a spacecraft take a picture of a target, a large set of low-level commands is communicated to the spacecraft to execute a turn, point in a given direction, open a camera lens, acquire data, format the data, and send it back to Earth. Using the MDS, there will be a single goal-oriented command to take a picture of a target. The various spacecraft systems, including the attitude system, the camera, and the telemetry system, will know how to achieve these goals, without disturbing other goals that may also have been requested. The MDS and the flight avionics will provide the basic capabilities for spacecraft automation, science data processing, and autonomous navigation. Individual flight missions will then build upon this capability to achieve their specific objectives. In order to achieve a smooth transition, many mission engineers also work with the X2000 FDP team. In addition, FDP will provide a generic communications transponding capability at both the current 8.4 GHz deep space band and the future 32 GHz band. Only the transponder will be provided by FDP. The front-end communication systems (which tend to differ from mission to mission) will be added by the individual missions. Although FDP capabilities were chosen to enable outer planets missions, many of these capabilities will also be suitable for use on Earth-orbiters. These include the entire avionics package and the Mission Data System. JPL has begun working with NASA s Goddard Space Flight Center to understand how these capabilities (and those in future deliveries) can be applied to near-earth spacecraft. 4. Second Delivery Last summer, the X2000 program began making choices concerning X2000 Second Delivery. Considerable effort was spent examining technologies that might mature in the 2003 time frame. Since there are few missions that launch after 2005 that are well defined, several possible mission scenarios were studied using JPL s Team-X [6] activity. Team-X consists of a group of experts in various spacecraft capabilities, a facility for collaborative engineering studies, and a database of possible future capabilities and costs. Team-X is usually used to prepare mission proposals. Here Team-X was used to study the impact of new technologies on possible future missions.

Among the mission scenarios that were studied in Team-X were a Europa lander, a Pluto lander, a Neptune orbiter, and aerobots (devices that maneuver in planetary atmospheres.) Other design work was conducted outside of Team-X (within the X2000 Future Deliveries Design Team) to further understand the possibilities for Second Delivery. When these studies were completed, NASA and JPL decided to focus the Second Delivery on enabling a generic micro spacecraft capability. These micro spacecraft could be as small as 10-50 kg. They could be fully functional spacecraft, daughter spacecraft (that would be deployed from larger vehicles for special purposes,) aerobot gondolas, or rover systems. There are four major new technology capabilities that are being considered for Second Delivery. First, there will be a further reduction in mass, power, and volume of the basic avionics capability. In particular, an order of magnitude reduction in mass beyond FDP is expected without any degradation in performance. In fact, an increase in performance of the system is likely. The architecture will build upon the plug-and-play architecture of FDP. Second, a micro propulsion capability for attitude and control of these micro spacecraft will be developed. The standard propulsion techniques available today are too large and too powerful for such small spacecraft. Third, a moderate to high bandwidth (from deep space) optical communications terminal will be developed. Analyses performed by JPL s Telecommunication and Mission Operations Directorate have shown a good business case for operational optical communications in the 2010 time frame [7]. In order to enable these cost savings, the first terminals must be developed in the Second Delivery era. The optical terminal will double as a high-resolution, narrow-field spacecraft imager. This dual-use technology will reduce the effective mass of the communication to close to zero. In a similar way, we will investigate using a star-tracker to double as a wide-field imager. Fourth, a communications relay capability will be studied. The trend in deep space exploration (and in many near-earth applications) is toward systems of spacecraft that work, together to achieve their goals. This relay capability will provide communication between spacecraft in a constellation, between landed elements and orbiters, between rovers and base stations, and between aerobots and other devices. JPL and GSFC have begun working together, even before these decisions were made, to allow as much of the Second Delivery capability as possible to be used by near-earth spacecraft. 5. Conclusion New technology is critical to the future of space exploration, but individual missions can no longer afford large individual technology programs. The X2000 Program is therefore extremely important to achieving NASA s goal of a dozen faster-better-cheaper missions to deep space each year. Most of the capabilities being developed in X2000 deliveries

are equally applicable to near-earth spacecraft. By working together with the near-earth spacecraft community, we can insure the maximum use of these new technologies. [I] "Advanced Microelectronics Technologies for future Small Satellite Systems," Leon Alkalai, IAA 2nd Annual Symposium on Small Satellites for Earth Observation, April 12-16, 1998, Berlin, Germany [2] "Space Radiosiotope Power Source Requirements Update and Technology Status," Mondt, Jack F., Proceedings of the 33rd Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Colorado Springs, Colorado, August 2-6, 1998 [3] "X2000 Systems and Technologies for Missions to the Outer Planets," Dave Woerner, International Astronautical Federation Congress, September 30, 1998, Melbourne, Australia. [4] Radiation at Europa [51 MDS [6] Team-X [7] "NASA's Deep Space Telecommunications Roadmap," Charles D. Edwards, Jr., Charles T. Stelzried, Leslie J. Deutsch, and Laif Swanson, Paper 1B029, Proceedings of SpaceOps98, Fifth International Symposium on Space Mission Operations and Ground Data Systems, June 1-5, 1998, Tokyo, Japan.