Providing a Resilient Timing and UTC Service Using eloran in the United States. Charles Schue - ION PTTI Monterey, CA

Similar documents
Wide Area Time distribution Via eloran. NASPI WG Meeting

Providing a Resilient Timing and UTC Service Using eloran in the United States

Note that MIFD II will also be influencing standards in the US.

Implementing a Wide Area High Accuracy UTC Service via eloran

Resilience through co-primary PNT solutions: GPS and eloran. By Charles Schue September 4, 2014

Modernized LORAN-C Timing Test Bed Status and Results

On the Uses of High Accuracy eloran Time, Frequency, and Phase

U.S. Perspectives on eloran as a Timing Backup And Available Hardware. Charles Schue UrsaNav, Inc. KTN Trinity House October 8, 2012

Modernized LORAN-C Timing Test Bed Status and Results

Leadership in Resilient PNT

A Holistic Approach to Trusted, Resilient PNT: GNSS, STL and eloran

Navigati. GNSS Resilience. The Magazine of the Royal Institute of Navigation MAY/JUN Resilience Has A Name Its name is eloran

Black Swans, White Elephants and Delivering a New National Timescale with eloran

Canadian Coast Guard Review to Implement a Resilient Position, Navigation and Timing Solution for Canada. Mariners Workshop January 31 st, 2018

Design and Performance of a Low Frequency Time and Frequency Dissemination Service

Timing via the New LORAN-C System W H I T E PA P E R

GPS Interference Detection & Mitigation

Transmission and User Requirements Technology for eloran (eloran 의송신기술및수신기기술 ) - Public Version -

PTTI CAPABILITIES OF THE MODERNIZED LORAN SYSTEM

Enhanced Loran. Sherman Lo, Benjamin Peterson With contributions from the FAA Loran Evaluation Team

eloran Points of Light

GNSS VULNERABILITY AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

eloran Points of Light

An alternative way of WAM system time synchronization. Presented by Vojtěch Stejskal ATM Madrid 2015

The Effect of Radio Frequency Interference on GNSS Signals and Mitigation Techniques Presented by Dr. Tarek Attia

Differential and Rubidium-Disciplined Test Results from an Iridium-Based Secure Timing Solution

GPS & other Radio Time sources

Information Technology Sector. Use of Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Services

Civil GPS Service Interface Committee (CGSIC) International Committee on GNSS November 2016

Developing a GNSS resiliency framework for timing receivers. By Guy Buesnel and Adam Price Spirent Communications, October 2017

Ensuring Robust Precision Time: Hardened GNSS, Multiband, and Atomic Clocks. Lee Cosart WSTS 2018

Integrated Navigation System Eurofix Vision, Concept, Design, Implementation & Test

LOCALIZATION WITH GPS UNAVAILABLE

Communications Sector. Use of Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Services

Clock Synchronization of Pseudolite Using Time Transfer Technique Based on GPS Code Measurement

COMMON-VIEW LORAN-C AS A BACKUP TO GPS FOR PRECISE TIME RECOVERY

S a t e l l i t e T i m e a n d L o c a t i o n. N o v e m b e r John Fischer VP Advanced R&D

CAN LORAN MEET GPS BACKUP REQUIREMENTS?

Defining Primary, Secondary, Additional Secondary Factors for RTCM Minimum Performance Specifications (MPS)

POLISH MARITIME DGPS REFERENCE STATIONS COVERAGE AFTER THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW FREQUENCY NET PRELIMINARY RESULTS.

Alternative Positioning, Navigation, Timing, and Data for Korea and the World

Energy Sector. Use of Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Services

Protection Augmentation Toughness and Alternatives of GNSS. Melaha 2016 Concord Al-Salam Hotel Cairo, April 25,2016 Refaat Rashad

PRECISE TIME DISTRIBUTION THROUGH INMARSAT FOR USE IN POWER SYSTEM CONTROL. Alison Brown and Scott Morell, NAVSYS Corporation ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

An Experiment Study for Time Synchronization Utilizing USRP and GNU Radio

Extreme space weather: Geomagnetic storms, GNSS disruptions and the impact on vital functions in society

Synchrophasors Using eloran Timing Source

DARPA developing Very Low Frequency (VLF) systems to provide GPS like position and timing technologies

JCG GMDSS Symposium NAVDAT : Navigational Data

Improving Loran Coverage with Low Power Transmitters

eloran The eloran Evaluation and Modernization Program --- Acknowledging the Past Looking to the Future Federal Aviation Administration

Analysis of the Effects of ASF Variations for Loran RNP 0.3

Experiences in. Flight Inspecting GBAS

Recommendations on Differential GNSS

Applying Defence-in-depth to counter RF interferences over GNSS

An Investigation into the Temporal Correlation at the ASF Monitor Sites

The Loran-C Resource in China and Its Potential Applications

DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE October 7-8, Sensors II. Redundancy in Dynamic Positioning Systems Based on Satellite Navigation

High power, digitally controlled, efficient, RF designs and solutions. Introduction to Nautel and NS Series LF High Power Amplifier

TIME DISTRIBUTION CAPABILITIES OF THE WIDE AREA AUGMENTATION SYSTEM (WAAS)

Update from the United States Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Advisory Board

Mobile Security Fall 2015

Does Anyone Really Know What Time It Is? Dr. Michael L. Cohen, MITRE October 15, 2013

Chapter 1: Telecommunication Fundamentals

Surviving and Operating Through GPS Denial and Deception Attack. Nathan Shults Kiewit Engineering Group Aaron Fansler AMPEX Intelligent Systems

Three Wishes. and an elaboration. For Reception of. Professor Bradford Parkinson Stanford University. (these are my personal views)

PROGRAM MANAGER S NOTE

Emergency Services Sector (Law Enforcement, EMS & Incident Management) Use of Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Services

PROTECTING GPS/GNSS-RELIANT MILITARY SYSTEMS

Airframe Effects on Loran H-field Antenna Performance

Chapter 1 Introduction

GPS and Recent Alternatives for Localisation. Dr. Thierry Peynot Australian Centre for Field Robotics The University of Sydney

GNSS MONITORING NETWORKS

Recent Calibrations of UTC(NIST) - UTC(USNO)

GPS Jamming and its impact on maritime navigation

Understanding GPS: Principles and Applications Second Edition

Robust Positioning for Urban Traffic

Proceedings of Al-Azhar Engineering 7 th International Conference Cairo, April 7-10, 2003.

COMMUNICATIONS FOR MARITIME SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY. Francis Zachariae, Secretary-General, IALA

GPS Time Synchronization with World-Class Accuracy using a Few Selected Satellites

Recommendation ITU-R M (09/2015)

Resilient Alternative PNT Capabilities for Aviation to Support Continued Performance Based Navigation

NMI's Role and Expertise in Synchronization Applications

MINOS Timing and GPS Precise Point Positioning

Working Party 5B DRAFT NEW RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.[500KHZ]

Establishing Traceability to UTC

Adaptive Array Technology for Navigation in Challenging Signal Environments

Development of Ultimate Seamless Positioning System for Global Cellular Phone Platform based on QZSS IMES

Performance of Loran-C 9 th Pulse Modulation Techniques

Digital GPS Repeaters for Wireless Network Timing

Low Frequency (LF) Solutions for Alternative Positioning, Navigation, Timing, and Data (APNT&D) and Associated Receiver Technology

Final Report for AOARD Grant FA Indoor Localization and Positioning through Signal of Opportunities. Date: 14 th June 2013

CHAPTER 24 LORAN NAVIGATION

Results from a GPS Timing Criticality Assessment

LC DELTA: Low Cost Digitally Enhanced Loran for Tactical Applications

USING GLONASS SIGNAL FOR CLOCK SYNCHRONIZATION

Single Frequency Network Structural Aspects & Practical Field Considerations

A Review of Vulnerabilities of ADS-B

Shared Use of DGPS for DP and Survey Operations

Boeing Timing & Location

Transcription:

Providing a Resilient Timing and UTC Service Using eloran in the United States Charles Schue - ION PTTI Monterey, CA January 27, 2016

Motivation For a Resilient Timing and UTC Service GPS/GNSS Vulnerabilities Performance degradation Ionosphere & solar activities (natural) Unintentional & intentional (human factors) Signal blockage Spectrum competition Common signal use across GNSS Radio frequency interference System anomalies & failures Jamming Spoofing & Counterfeit Signals Proliferation of satellite systems Escalating costs Program funding delays Satellite launch problems Ground segment problems Of the 16 Critical Infrastructure / Key Resource sectors in the U.S., 15 use GPS for timing. GPS timing is deemed essential for 11 of the sectors. [Source: U.S. DHS] 2

Can we have complementary (PN)T via eloran? Source: 2014 Federal Radionavigation Plan CRADA Partners: DHS S&T; USCG; Harris; Evaluate eloran as a stable, wide area source of precise time for redundancy and resiliency in critical infrastructure. Determine coverage area and accuracy Test in areas where GPS is unavailable or significantly degraded Evaluate UTC TWSTT time synchronization with USNO 3

What is Loran-C and Enhanced Loran? Loran-C: Radio Frequency (RF) system 90 110 khz Ground wave signal Very high power Pulsed Stratum 1 frequency standard Positioning, Navigation, Timing Enhanced Loran: All the good stuff from Loran, plus: Time-of-Transmission control Differential corrections (dloran or DGPS) Receivers can use all-in-view signals Loran Data Channel (LDC) Additional integrity Transmissions synchronized to UTC New infrastructure & technology 21 st century solid state transmitters Three cesium PRS per station Precision time & frequency equipment Whole-station UPS Secure telecommunications New Operations Paradigms Unmanned and/or autonomous operation Sites v. Stations Time-of-Emission v. System Area Monitor ASF modeling and/or measurement 4

eloran Generation 21 Technology User Receivers Transmitting Site Remote Time Scale GNSS (GPS) TWSTT TWLFTT Microwave Dedicated fiber "Hot Clock" Differential Reference Site Local Time Scale 5071A Cesium PRS 5071A Cesium PRS 5071A Cesium PRS Can operate 70-90 days without remote reference. LCD, keyboard and mouse set per MCS Workstation Primary Workstation Secondary Workstation MCS Server Network switch with VPN support Control & Monitor Site Uninterruptible Power Supply - provided by GLAs 6 5 4 3 2 1 Workstation Workstation Server LAN UPS 230 V 5

Ground Wave: We Must Compensate for Propagation Delays An eloran receiver measures the Time-of- Arrival (TOA) of the signal. TOA = TTOR TTOT = PF + SF + ASF + Rx TOR TOT PF SF ASF Rx - Time of Reception, - Time of Transmission, - Primary Factor, - Secondary Factor, - Additional Secondary Factor, and - Receiver and cable delays. Source: electronics-radio.com PF accounts for propagation through air. SF accounts for propagation over sea water. ASF accounts for propagation over land and elevated terrain. PF and SF are well defined delays and can be calculated as a function of distance. ASF delays are typically unknown at the time of installation, but may be modeled and/or measured, or may be pre-loaded in a receiver database. 6

Correcting for Wide Area Delays Source: Swaszek, Lo, et al, ILA 2007 Distances (miles) Caribou, ME to URI: 430 Seneca, NY to URI: 300 Nantucket, MA to URI: 85 Carolina Beach, NC to URI: 600 ASFs are virtually constant over long periods! 7

Correcting for Local Variations Differential eloran RefSta: weather, seasonal conductivity changes, diurnal influences Positioning or Timing User User is equipped with a receiver that has a stored ASF map Corrections for the area of operation calculated at a fixed site Correction info sent to transmitter for broadcast via data channel Corrections can be applied by receiver and are monitored for integrity Note that multiple data channels are available to support various applications, including differential corrections, signal integrity, encrypted messaging, etc. 8

Evaluate: eloran as a Wide Area Timing Source Transmissions from former USCG Loran Support Unit site at Wildwood, NJ 360 KW Effective Radiated Power TWSTT UTC reference from the USNO Receivers Bangor, ME N. Billerica, MA Franklin, MA Washington, DC (USNO) Leesburg, VA Technology Outdoor E-Field antenna Loran Data Channel (LDC) demodulation available GPS and/or 5071A PRS used as timing comparison Without differential corrections Criteria Meet one microsecond 2014 FRP Timing User Requirement 9

eloran Timing Evaluation Technology Laydown LSU LSU, NJ to (miles) - Bangor, ME: 500 N. Billerica, MA: 310 Boston, MA: 305 Franklin, MA: 280 USNO, DC: 120 Leesburg, VA: 140 eloran transmitter at Wildwood, NJ Synchronized to UTC via Two Way Satellite Time Transfer (TWSTT) provided by US Naval Observatory 360KW of Effective Radiated Power Broadcasting dual rated as 8970 Master and Secondary Data sent via LDC only on Secondary rate at raw data rate of 56 bps and effective data rate of 21 bps Differential eloran Reference sites at: North Billerica, MA Leesburg, VA 10

Wildwood, NJ to Bangor, ME User Receiver Bangor, ME 2014 FRP +/- one microsecond as Y-Axis December 2015 Distance to XMTR: 500 miles Mean: 49.7 ns STD: 68.6 ns Max: 216.0 ns Min: -91.0 ns 11

Wildwood, NJ to N. Billerica, MA User Receiver N. Billerica, MA 2014 FRP +/- one microsecond as Y-Axis January 2016 Distance to XMTR: 310 miles Mean: 291.7 ns STD: 96.3 ns Max: 474.0 ns Min: 47.0 ns 12

Wildwood, NJ to Franklin, MA User Receiver Franklin, MA 2014 FRP +/- one microsecond as Y-Axis January 2016 Distance to XMTR: 280 miles Mean: 4.2 ns STD: 109.3 ns Max: 205.8 ns Min: -301.3 ns 13

Wildwood, NJ to Washington, DC (USNO) User Receiver Washington, DC 2014 FRP +/- one microsecond as Y-Axis December 2015 Distance to XMTR: 120 miles Mean: 22.9 ns STD: 26.1 ns Max: 147.0 ns Min: -90.0 ns 14

Wildwood, NJ to Leesburg, VA User Receiver Leesburg, VA 2014 FRP +/- one microsecond as Y-Axis January 2016 Distance to XMTR: 140 miles Mean: 153.6 ns STD: 79.9 ns Max: 358.0 ns Min: -16.0 ns 15

Postulate: Wide Area Basic eloran Timing Service (BeTS) CONUS 4 transmitting stations Former Loran Support Unit site at Wildwood, NJ Former Loran-C transmitting station sites: Dana, IN; Boise City, OK; Fallon, NV 1 MW ERP Loran Data Channel demodulation coverage No differential reference stations Meets, or exceeds, 2014 FRP one microsecond timing accuracy requirement 16

BeTS Coverage From Former Wildwood, NJ Transmitting Site 500 Mile Timing Test Site 2014 FRP Coverage Area. 360 KW transmissions. 1 MW transmissions. 17

BeTS Coverage From Initial Four CONUS eloran Transmitting Sites 2014 FRP Coverage Area With 1 MW Transmitting Stations 18

Evaluate: eloran as a Higher Accuracy Timing Source Transmissions from former USCG Loran Support Unit site at Wildwood, NJ 360 KW Effective Radiated Power TWSTT UTC reference from the USNO Reference Stations / User Receivers N. Billerica, MA RefSta Franklin, MA Leesburg, VA RefSta Washington, DC (USNO) Technology Outdoor E-Field antenna Loran Data Channel (LDC) demodulation available GPS and/or 5071A PRS used as timing comparison With differential corrections Goal Timing accuracy of +/- 100 nanoseconds WRT UTC (USNO) Initial differential coverage of 35 miles radius 19

Wildwood, NJ to N. Billerica, MA RefSta N. Billerica, MA 2014 FRP +/- one microsecond as Y-Axis Black Basic Distance to XMTR: 310 miles Mean: 166.7 ns STD: 53.6 ns Max: 299.0 ns Min: 56.0 ns December 2015 Blue Precision Distance to XMTR: 310 miles Mean: 5.0 ns STD: 4.4 ns Max: 36.0 ns Min: -31.0 ns 20

Wildwood, NJ to N. Billerica, MA RefSta N. Billerica, N. Billerica, MA MA 2014 FRP +/- one microsecond as X-Axis Y-Axis Black/Blue Basic Distance to XMTR: 310 miles Mean: 303.0 ns STD: 98.5 ns Max: 500.0 ns Min: 46.0 ns January 2016 Green Precision Distance to XMTR: 310 miles Mean: 11.8 ns STD: 6.8 ns Max: 48.3 ns Min: -20.9 ns 21

N. Billerica, MA RefSta to Franklin, MA User Receiver Differential corrections were disabled at the Franklin site, but the receiver continues to use the last correction it received. Franklin, MA 2014 FRP +/- one microsecond as Y-Axis Black Basic Distance to XMTR: 280 miles Distance to REFSTA: 35 miles Mean: 166.9 ns STD: 53.6 ns Max: 299.0 ns Min: 56.0 ns December 2015 Blue Precision Distance to XMTR: 280 miles Distance to REFSTA: 35 miles Mean: 1.2 ns STD: 45.2 ns Max: 96.1 ns Min: -106.4 ns 22

Wildwood, NJ to Leesburg, VA RefSta Leesburg, VA 2014 FRP +/- one microsecond as Y-Axis January 2016 Black/Blue Basic Distance to XMTR: 140 miles Mean: 153.6 ns STD: 79.9 ns Max: 358.0 ns Min: -16.0 ns Green Precision Distance to XMTR: 140 miles Mean: 0.0 ns STD: 7.8 ns Max: 66.2 ns Min: -88.8 ns 23

Leesburg, VA RefSta to Washington, DC (USNO) User Receiver Washington, DC Franklin, (USNO) MA 2014 FRP +/- one microsecond as Y-Axis Blue Basic Distance to XMTR: 120 miles Distance to REFSTA: 25 miles Mean: 110.0 ns STD: 46.2 ns Max: 224.0 ns Min: 23.0 ns January 2016 Green Precision Distance to XMTR: 120 miles Distance to REFSTA: 25 miles Mean: 2.5 ns STD: 16.8 ns Max: 103.3 ns Min: -66.2 ns 24

Postulate: Local Area Precision eloran Timing Service (PeTS) CONUS metropolitan or other high priority locations Coverage and accuracy Expected differential timing coverage of 35 miles radius Expected accuracy of +/- 100 nanoseconds WRT UTC (USNO) Representative Differential Reference Station laydown consists of 71 locations Covers top 50 major metropolitan areas Covers top 50 ports/harbors Covers top 50 airports 25

Representative Higher Accuracy Locations Within CONUS Location of Differential eloran Reference Station Site 26

Indoor H-Field Test: Metropolitan Boston, MA Westin Hotel 36 th (top) floor N Copley Square 305 miles NE of transmitter N Room Prototype H-Field Antenna Direction of eloran signal (i.e., from the SW) 27

Metropolitan Area Indoor H-Field Test: Boston, MA 2014 FRP +/- one microsecond as Y-Axis January 2016 Distance to XMTR: 305 miles Without differential corrections. Mean: 0.0 ns STD: 83.2 ns Max: 139.9 ns Min: -126.1 ns 28

Commercial Area Indoor H-Field Test: N. Billerica, MA Playing with receiver software! 2014 FRP +/- one microsecond as X-Axis Y-Axis January 2016 Distance to XMTR: 310 miles Without differential corrections. Mean: 0.0 ns STD: 178.6 ns Max: 514.4 ns Min: -412.6 ns 29

Residential Area Indoor H-Field Test: Bedford, MA 2014 FRP +/- one microsecond as Y-Axis January 2016 Distance to XMTR: 303 miles Without differential corrections. Mean: 0.0 ns STD: 66.5 ns Max: 162.6 ns Min: -91.4 ns 30

Take Aways 1. eloran is a stable, wide area source of PNT for redundancy and resiliency in critical infrastructure and key resource sectors B. Without differential corrections, eloran is capable of meeting 2014 FRP timing user requirements over very wide areas III. With the application of differential corrections, eloran is capable of meeting the needs of higher accuracy timing users over a local area Δ. With an initial four transmitting stations, eloran can provide resilient and complimentary timing, frequency, and data over the CONUS 5. With additional transmitting stations, eloran can provide additional resilience and complimentary positioning over the CONUS Contact Us for Collaborative Efforts, Inc. 85 Rangeway Road Building 3, Suite 110 North Billerica, MA 01862 +1.781.538.5299 www.ursanav.com 31