Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DELAWARE

Similar documents
Case 1:17-cv RGA Document 8 Filed 09/06/17 Page 1 of 90 PageID #: 546 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case5:13-cv HRL Document15 Filed01/22/13 Page1 of 8

Case 5:07-cv D Document 1 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. Nature of Action

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION : : Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, an Arizona limited liability partnership, d/b/a HBI International,

Case 4:14-cv BRW Document 58 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 13

Attorneys for Plaintiff XR Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 11/27/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1

Case 2:11-cv KHV-DJW Document 1 Filed 12/19/11 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/05/14 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 2:10-cv Document 1 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 19

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. E4X, Inc.; Fiftyone, Inc.; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 2:12-cv JCC Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO.

Case 2:08-cv DF-CE Document 1 Filed 07/29/08 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 11/29/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

~ft~... J _J ~ ' ;1 '::1st~ ::i<isi~1 110.J tn Dis~~d;e ~

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

PlainSite. Legal Document. Ohio Northern District Court Case No. 5:12-cv Sherwin-Williams Company v. Wooster Brush Company.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT

Case 3:14-cv AJB-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:16-cv TWP-MPB Document 1 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv KMT Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:10-cv D Document 119 Filed 10/07/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 1770

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

Case 1:18-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 21 : : : : : : : : : : : : :

KRYPTONITE AUTHORIZED ONLINE SELLER APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT Effective: January 1, 2018

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendant.

MEDICINE LICENSE TO PUBLISH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Case 3:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/05/15 Page 1 of 18

Case 6:15-cv RWS-CMC Document 78 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4503

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 1 of 17 : : Defendants. :

Case 3:14-cv PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:11-cv RBD-TEM Document 155 Filed 08/27/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID 3550

CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI AMENDED CLASS-ACTION PETITION

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/09/17 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

4. Jeffrey A. Goldberg and Andrew Federhar are attorneys who represented the Kingman Airport Authority with respect to the condemnation proceeding

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2016

Case 3:18-cv D Document 1 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23 PageID 1

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Cross-Complainant Western National Construction ("Western") in this action.

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC, Plaintiff. v. GATEWAY, INC. and Gateway Country Stores LLC; and, Microsoft Corporation; and, Dell, Inc, Defendants.

Case 3:16-cv JAM Document 1 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 1:12-cv CCC Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

defendants, including HSBC, Isaac Franco, Ken Cayre, Joseph Dwek and Yeshuah, LLC, filed

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 1 of 135 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Panel on IP Valuation: How Much is it Worth? How Much Can You Get? How Can You Protect It?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT NEW POST-ISSUANCE PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/13/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 5:16-cv HRL Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 10

Yee ) and A.V. Jewelry Export-Import, Ltd. ( AV Jewelry ) (collectively Plaintiffs ), for their

Case 1:11-cv JSR Document 33 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1082 Filed05/08/15 Page1 of 5

Intellectual Property. Rajkumar Lakshmanaswamy, PhD

Patenting Software Technology Experiences with India & US

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :38 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents

Case 2:18-cv NBF Document 1 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 11

CASE 0:18-cv PAM-HB Document 1 Filed 06/19/18 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

TEPZZ 879Z A_T EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (51) Int Cl.: G06F 3/0354 ( )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2013

Case 1:06-cv RWR Document t Filed 06/22/2006 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC d/b/a Mall of America for its Verified Complaint

SAN DIEGO CITY SCHOOLS

Measuring Wireless Power Charging Systems for Portable Electronics

China: Patent LAW. Randall Rader Tsinghua University Professor and Advisory Board Chair

Recent Changes to the Patent Litigation Landscape and Predictions for the Future. June 12, 2018

Transcription:

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DELAWARE MAGNACHARGE LLC v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., and SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA), INC. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Magnacharge LLC ( Magnacharge or Plaintiff ), for its Complaint against Defendants Sony Electronics, Inc. ( Sony US or Defendant ), and Sony Mobile Communications (USA), Inc. ( Sony Mobile or Defendant ), (collectively Sony or Defendants ), alleges the following: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq. THE PARTIES 2. Plaintiff Magnacharge is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Texas with a place of business at 10 Ballingomingo Road, Bldg. P., Conshohocken, Pennsylvania. 3. Upon information and belief, Sony US is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with a place of business at 16535 Via Esprillo, San Diego, CA 92127, and can be served through its registered agent, Corporation Service Company, 251 Little Page 1 of 16

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 2 of 16 PageID #: 2 Falls Drive, Wilmington, Delaware 19808. Upon information and belief, Sony US sells and offers to sell products and services throughout the United States, including in this judicial district, and introduces products and services that into the stream of commerce and that incorporate infringing technology knowing that they would be sold in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States. 4. Upon information and belief, Sony Mobile is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with a place of business at 2207 Bridgepoint Parkway, San Mateo, California 94404, and can be served through its registered agent, Capitol Services, Inc., 1675 S. State Street, Suite B, Dover, Delaware 19901. Upon information and belief, Sony Mobile sells and offers to sell products and services throughout the United States, including in this judicial district, and introduces products and services that into the stream of commerce and that incorporate infringing technology knowing that they would be sold in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. 6. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 7. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. 1400(b). On information and belief, each Defendant is incorporated in the State of Delaware. 8. On information and belief, Defendants are subject to this Court s general and specific personal jurisdiction because Defendants have sufficient minimum contacts within the State of Delaware and this District, pursuant to due process and/or the Del. Code. Ann. Tit. 3, 3104, because Defendants purposefully availed themselves of the privileges of conducting business in the State of Delaware and in this District, because Defendants regularly conduct and solicit Page 2 of 16

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 3 of 16 PageID #: 3 business within the State of Delaware and within this District, and because Plaintiffs causes of action arise directly from each of Defendants business contacts and other activities in the State of Delaware and this District. Further, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because each Defendant is incorporated in Delaware and has purposely availed itself of the privileges and benefits of the laws of the State of Delaware. The Invention BACKGROUND 9. Jin-Sun Kim and Young-Jun Kim are the inventors (hereinafter the Inventors ) of U.S. Patent No. 7,417,402 ( the 402 patent ). A true and correct copy of the 402 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 10. The 402 patent resulted from the pioneering efforts of the Inventors in the area of non-contact, magnetic field battery charging. These efforts resulted in the development of a novel method and apparatus for non-contact type battery pack charging for which a patent application was originally filed in Korea in 2002. At the time of these pioneering efforts, the most widely implemented technology used to address battery charging for rechargeable electronic devices was a technology in which the charging terminals of a battery pack come in electrical contact with the charging terminals of a battery pack charging apparatus. In that type of system, as explained in the 402 patent:... the charging of the battery pack is possible only when the terminals of the battery pack and the battery pack charging apparatus come in correct electrical contact with each other, so that the use of the contact type battery pack charging apparatus is considerably inconvenient. Furthermore, the positions of the charging terminals of the battery pack and the battery pack charging apparatus must be changed according to the various designs of potable [sic] devices including potable [sic] terminals, so that a problem arises in that dedicated battery pack charging apparatuses corresponding to the locations of the charging terminals of the battery pack. Page 3 of 16

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 4 of 16 PageID #: 4 To solve the problems, a non-contact type battery pack charging apparatus using a magnetic field is provided, as disclosed in Korean Pat. Appl. No. 1999-53492 and Korean Utility Model No. 2001-27153. However, in Korean Pat. Appl. No. 1999-53492 and Korean Utility Model No. 2001-27153, a provision for satisfactorily charging battery packs having different charge capacities for a set time is not made, so that a problem arises in that the battery pack charging apparatuses corresponding to the charge capacities must be provided. Furthermore, even though an inductive load (conductive material) other than a capacitive load is installed on the battery pack charging apparatus, the conventional non-contact type battery pack charging apparatus regards the inductive load as a capacitive load and performs charging operations, so that a problem arises in that unnecessary power consumption is incurred.... Accordingly, the present invention has been made keeping in mind the above problems occurring in the prior art, and an object of the present invention is to provide a non-contact type battery pack charging apparatus, which is capable of satisfactorily charging various battery packs having different charge capacities for an appropriate time and preventing unnecessary power consumption incurred by an inductive load. (See Exhibit A, 402 patent at 1:23-50.) 11. The Inventors conceived of the inventions claimed in the 402 patent as a way to address the aforementioned drawbacks of the prior art. As explained in the 402 patent:... the present invention has been made keeping in mind the above problems occurring in the prior art, and an object of the present invention is to provide a non-contact type battery pack charging apparatus, which is capable of satisfactorily charging various battery packs having different charge capacities for an appropriate time and preventing unnecessary power consumption incurred by an inductive load. (See Exhibit A, 402 patent at 1:54:60.) Commercial Adoption 12. Because of the significant advantages that can be achieved through the use of the claimed innovations, the 402 patent presents significant commercial value for, and usage by, companies like Defendants. Page 4 of 16

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 5 of 16 PageID #: 5 13. Indeed, the claimed innovations are so substantial that these ideas were implemented through an industry standard that evolved and gained widespread commercial use over the last decade and was adopted by Defendants for certain of their devices. This industry standard, known as Qi ( ), is an open, universal wireless charging standard for interoperability across rechargeable electronic devices (hereinafter the Qi Standard ). (See Exhibit B, Wireless Power Consortium Press Release, WIRELESS POWER CONSORTIUM ADDS LEADING TECHNOLOGY BRANDS, SIGNALS FURTHER MOMENTUM FOR GLOBAL ADOPTION OF QI STANDARD, Published on Jul 16, 2010; also available online at: https://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/data/downloadables/1/7/9/ wpc_pr7_3dec09_english.pdf.) 14. The Qi Standard is the result of an effort by the Wireless Power Consortium ( WPC ), an open, collaborative standards development group of more than 570 company members around the globe, established in 2008. (See Exhibit C, Wireless Power Consortium Press Release, Consumer Adoption, Interest in Wireless Charging Continues to Surge, New International Survey Shows, Published on June 19, 2018; also available online at: https://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/data/downloadables/2/0/6/1/consumer-adoptioninterest-in-wireless-charging-continues-to-surge-new-international-survey-shows.pdf.) The WPC mission is to create and promote wide market adoption of the Qi Standard. (Exhibit B at p. 2.) 15. The Qi Standard parts applicable to this action are reflected in documents titled: (1) The Qi Wireless Power Transfer System - Power Class 0 Specification - Parts 1 and 2: Interface Definitions, as shown in Version 1.2.2, dated April 2016 (hereinafter Qi Parts 1 & 2 ; a PDF copy of which was available online at the time of filing at: http://www.zoop- Page 5 of 16

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 6 of 16 PageID #: 6 tech.com/download/info/31.html); and (2) The Qi Wireless Power Transfer System - Power Class 0 Specification Part 4: Reference Designs, as shown in Version 1.2.2, dated April 2016 (hereinafter Qi Part 4 ; a PDF copy of which was available online at the time of filing at: http://gbtp.or.kr/wireless/upload//20171110025634271.pdf). COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,417,402 16. The allegations set forth in the foregoing paragraphs 1 through 15 are incorporated into this First Claim for Relief. 17. On August 26, 2008, the 402 patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office under the title Non-contact type battery pack charging apparatus. 18. Magnacharge is the assignee and owner of the right, title and interest in and to the 402 patent, including the right to assert all causes of action arising under said patent and the right to any remedies for infringement of it. 19. Upon information and belief, Defendants have and continue to directly infringe one or more claims of the 402 patent by selling, offering to sell, making, and/or importing noncontact type battery pack charging products that operate according to the Qi Standard, which products by way of example include the Wireless Charging Dock WCH20 (https://www.sonymobile.com/us/products/accessories/wireless-charging-dock-wch20/), collectively referred to herein as the Accused Instrumentalities. 20. In view of the following, the Accused Instrumentalities infringed and continue to infringe claim 1 of the 402 patent during the pendency of the 402 patent. 21. Upon information and belief, the Accused Instrumentalities are non-contact type battery pack charging apparatuses. Page 6 of 16

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 7 of 16 PageID #: 7 22. Upon information and belief, the Accused Instrumentalities include an apparatus with a power control unit for supplying Direct Current (DC) power to a main control unit and a variable-voltage frequency generation unit. 23. Specifically, Section 1.5 of Qi Parts 1 & 2 defines a Power Transmitter, as [t]he subsystem of a Base Station that generates near field inductive power and controls its transfer to a Power Receiver, as defined in The Qi Wireless Power Transfer System, Power Class 0 Specification. (Id. at p. 13.) Moreover, Section 8 of the Qi Parts 1 & 2 describes Figure 43 (reproduced below) as a schematic diagram of a wireless power transfer System, consisting of a Power Transmitter coupled to a Power Receiver. As illustrated, PPin represents the DC input power to the (inverter stage of the) Power Transmitter, and PPOL represents the amount of DC power that is consumed in the load that is connected to the output terminals of the Power Receiver. The system efficiency is defined as: 24. Upon information and belief, the Accused Instrumentalities include an apparatus wherein the variable-voltage frequency generation unit converts the DC power supplied from the Page 7 of 16

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 8 of 16 PageID #: 8 power control unit into a frequency having an arbitrary voltage value and outputs the frequency to a magnetic field generation unit under the control of the main control unit. 25. Specifically, Section 3.2.4 of Qi Parts 1 and 2 recites, that [t] The Power Transmitter consists of a power source (uuop, ffop), a capacitance CCp, an inductance LLp, and a resistance RRp. The power source supplies a sinusoidal voltage uuop at a frequency ffop. (See Qi Parts 1 and 2 at p. 36.) Section 3.2.4 also illustrates, through Figure 10 reproduced below, a simplified model of the system intended by the Qi Standard. (Id.) (Id.) As noted above, Section 1.5 of Qi Parts 1 & 2 defines a Power Transmitter, as [t]he subsystem of a Base Station that generates near field inductive power and controls its transfer to a Power Receiver... (Id. at p. 13.) 26. Upon information and belief, the Accused Instrumentalities include an apparatus wherein the magnetic field generation unit receives the frequency output from the variablevoltage frequency generation unit and radiates a magnetic force corresponding to the frequency to the outside. 27. Specifically, Section 1.3 of Qi Parts 1 and 2 describes among the Main Features, [a] method of contactless power transfer from a Base Station to a Mobile Device that is based Page 8 of 16

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 9 of 16 PageID #: 9 on near field magnetic induction between coils. (See Qi Parts 1 and 2 at p. 9.) Section 1.5 of Qi Parts 1 and 2 defines Active Area as [t]he part of the Interface Surface of a Base Station or Mobile Device through which a sufficiently high magnetic flux penetrates when the Base Station is providing power to the Mobile Device, and Primary Cell as [a] single Primary Coil or a combination of Primary Coils that are used to provide a sufficiently high magnetic flux through the Active Area and Primary Coil as [a] component of a Power Transmitter that converts electric current to magnetic flux.. (Id. at pp. 11 and 13.) 28. Upon information and belief, the Accused Instrumentalities include an apparatus wherein a voltage comparison unit detects a voltage value input to the magnetic field generation unit and a voltage value of the magnetic field generation unit, to compare the voltage values with each other, and outputs a voltage comparison value to the main control unit. 29. Specifically, Section 5.1.1 of Qi Parts 1 and 2 explains that: [u]sing the desired Control Point and actual Control Point, the Power Receiver calculates a Control Error Value for example, by simply taking the (relative) difference of the two output voltages or currents.... Subsequently, the Power Receiver transmits this Control Error Value to the Power Transmitter.... The Power Transmitter uses the Control Error Value and the actual Primary Cell current to determine a new Primary Cell current. After the system stabilizes from the communications of the Control Error Packet, the Power Transmitter has a short time window to control its actual Primary Cell current towards the new Primary Cell current. Within this window, the Power Transmitter reaches a new Operating Point: the amplitude, frequency, and duty cycle of the AC voltage that is applied to the Primary Cell. (Id at p. 45-46.) The voltage comparison unit concept is illustrated in the functional block diagrams for the Baseline and Extended Power Profile Power Receivers of Figures 4 and 5 in Qi Parts 1 and 2, reproduced below. Page 9 of 16

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 10 of 16 PageID #: 10 Page 10 of 16

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 11 of 16 PageID #: 11 (Qi Parts 1 and 2 at pp. 23, 25.) The voltage comparison unit is also illustrated through the power transfer loop of Figure 17 in Qi Parts 1 and 2, reproduced here: (Qi Parts 1 and 2 at p. 46.) 30. Upon information and belief, the Accused Instrumentalities include an apparatus wherein a current comparison unit detects the voltage value input to the magnetic field generation unit and the voltage value of the magnetic field generation unit, converts the voltage values into current values, compares the current values with each other, and outputs a current comparison value to the main control unit. 31. Specifically, as noted above, Section 3.1.4 of Qi Parts 1 and 2 explains the calculation of an Control Error Value for example, by simply taking the (relative) difference of the two output voltages or currents.... Subsequently, the Power Receiver transmits this Control Error Value to the Power Transmitter.... The Power Transmitter uses the Control Error Page 11 of 16

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 12 of 16 PageID #: 12 Value and the actual Primary Cell current to determine a new Primary Cell current. (Qi Parts 1 and 2 at pp. 45-46.) 32. Upon information and belief, the Accused Instrumentalities include an apparatus wherein a voltage detection unit detects a voltage value output from the variable-voltage frequency generation unit and outputs the voltage value to the main control unit. 33. Specifically, Section 5.1.1 of Qi Parts 1 and 2 explains that [t]he Power Transmitter uses the Control Error Value and the actual Primary Cell current to determine a new Primary Cell current. (Qi Parts 1 and 2 at p. 46.) Section 5.2.1 of Qi Parts 1 and 2 further explains that [t]he Power Transmitter detects this as a modulation of the current through and/or voltage across the Primary Cell. (Qi Parts 1 and 2 at p. 84.) 34. Upon information and belief, the Accused Instrumentalities include an apparatus wherein a current detection unit detects a voltage value of the magnetic field generation unit, converts the voltage value into a current value, and outputs the current value to the main control unit. 35. Specifically, as noted above, Section 5.1.1 of Qi Parts 1 and 2 explains that [t]he Power Transmitter uses the Control Error Value and the actual Primary Cell current to determine a new Primary Cell current. (Qi Parts 1 and 2 at p. 46.) Section 5.2.1 of Qi Parts 1 and 2 further explains that [t]he Power Transmitter detects this as a modulation of the current through and/or voltage across the Primary Cell. (Qi Parts 1 and 2 at p. 84.) 36. Upon information and belief, the Accused Instrumentalities include an apparatus wherein the main control unit receives signals output from the current comparison unit, the voltage comparison unit, the voltage detection unit and the current detection unit and controls the operations of the variable-voltage frequency generation unit. Page 12 of 16

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 13 of 16 PageID #: 13 37. Specifically, Section 1.5 (Definitions) of Qi Parts 1 and 2 defines the Communications and Control Unit as [t]he functional part of a Power Transmitter or Power Receiver that controls the power transfer, and the Power Transmitter as [t]he subsystem of a Base Station that generates near field inductive power and controls its transfer to a Power Receiver... (Qi Parts 1 and 2 at pp. 11, 13.) Moreover, Section 3.2.4 (Power Receiver overvoltage protection) explains that [t]he Power Transmitter controls the amount of power it transfers by adjusting the amplitude of its voltage and frequency in the ranges given in Table 7. (Qi Parts 1 and 2 at p. 35.) 38. In view of the following, the Accused Instrumentalities infringed and continue to infringe claim 2 of the 402 patent during the pendency of the 402 patent. 39. Upon information and belief, the Accused Instrumentalities include a non-contact type battery pack charging apparatus meeting the limitations of claim 1 as described above. 40. Upon information and belief, the Accused Instrumentalities include an apparatus wherein the main control unit is connected with a battery pack detection unit for detecting whether the battery pack is installed. 41. Specifically, Section 5.1.1 (Information interface - Overview) of Qi Parts 1 and 2 explains a selection phase in which the Power Transmitter typically monitors the Interface Surface for the placement and removal of objects. The Power Transmitter may use a variety of methods for this purpose. See Section 10, Object Detection (Informative) for some examples. If the Power Transmitter discovers one or more objects, it should attempt to locate those objects in particular if it supports Free Positioning. In addition, the Power Transmitter may attempt to differentiate between Power Receivers and Foreign Objects, such as keys, coins, etc. (See Qi Parts 1 and 2 at p. 44.) Page 13 of 16

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 14 of 16 PageID #: 14 42. In view of the following, the Accused Instrumentalities infringed and continue to infringe claim 4 of the 402 patent during the pendency of the 402 patent. 43. Upon information and belief, the Accused Instrumentalities include a non-contact type battery pack charging apparatus meeting the limitations of claim 1 as described above. 44. Upon information and belief, the Accused Instrumentalities include an apparatus wherein the main control unit is connected with an operational status display unit for allowing a user to be aware of operational status of the battery pack charging apparatus. 45. Specifically, Section 5.2.3.5 (Charge Status Packet) of Qi Parts 1 and 2 explains a Charge Status Value wherein, [i]f the Mobile Device contains a rechargeable energy storage device, the unsigned integer contained in this field indicates the charging level of that energy storage device as a percentage of the fully charged level. (See Qi Parts 1 and 2 at p. 93.) 46. In view of the following, the Accused Instrumentalities infringed and continue to infringe claim 5 of the 402 patent during the pendency of the 402 patent. 47. Upon information and belief, the Accused Instrumentalities include a non-contact type battery pack charging apparatus meeting the limitations of claim 4 as described above. 48. Upon information and belief, the Accused Instrumentalities include an apparatus wherein the operational status display unit includes an abnormal status display unit for displaying operating errors of the battery pack charging apparatus and a charging status display unit for displaying whether charging of the battery pack is being performed or is complete when the battery pack charging apparatus is normally performed. 49. Specifically, Section 5.2.3.5 (Charge Status Packet) of Qi Parts 1 and 2 further clarifies, with respect to a Charge Status Value, that the value 0 means an empty energy storage device and the value 100 means a fully charged energy storage device. (See Qi Parts 1 Page 14 of 16

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 15 of 16 PageID #: 15 and 2 at p. 93.) Qi Parts 1 and 2 further explains, in Section 5.1.2.3, that if the Power Transmitter does not receive a Packet correctly (see Section 5.2.2.4, Packet structure), the Power Transmitter shall remove the Power Signal within ttterminate after detecting the error. (Qi Parts 1 and 2 at p. 53.) In addition, Section 5.2.3.2 of Qi Parts 1 and 2 provides Table 29 End Power Transfer values, wherein the Charge Complete reason is recommended for usage with Value 0x01 if it determines that the battery of the Mobile Device is fully charged. On receipt of an End Power Transfer Packet containing this value, the Transmitter should set any charged indication on its user interface that is associated with the Receiver. (Qi Parts 1 and 2 at p. 91.) 50. Upon information and belief, since at least the time of receiving this Complaint, Defendants have been aware of the 402 patent and these claims of infringement with respect to wireless charging pursuant to the Qi Standard and have induced and continue to induce others to infringe at least claims 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the 402 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(b) by, among other things, and with specific intent or willful blindness, actively aiding and abetting others to infringe, including but not limited to purchasers of Defendants devices chargeable using the Qi Standard, for example Defendants Xperia XZ3, Xperia XZ2 Premium, Xperia XZ2 model phones (https://www.sonymobile.com/us/products/phones/xperia-xz3/specifications/; https://www.sonymobile.com/us/products/phones/xperia-xz2-premium/specifications/; https://www.sonymobile.com/us/products/phones/xperia-xz2/specifications/), which purchasers use of the Accused Instrumentalities constitutes direct infringement of at least claims 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the 402 patent. 51. Magnacharge has been harmed by the Defendants infringing activities. JURY DEMAND Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Magnacharge demands a trial by jury on all issues triable as such. Page 15 of 16

Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 16 of 16 PageID #: 16 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Magnacharge demands judgment for itself and against Defendants as follows: A. An adjudication that the Defendants have infringed the 402 patent; B. An award of damages to be paid by Defendants adequate to compensate Magnacharge for Defendants past infringement of the 402 patent, and any continuing or future infringement through the date such judgment is entered, including interest, costs, expenses and an accounting of all infringing acts including, but not limited to, those acts not presented at trial; C. A declaration that this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. 285, and an award of Magnacharge s reasonable attorneys fees; and D. An award to Magnacharge of such further relief at law or in equity as the Court deems just and proper. Dated: October 17, 2018 DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC /s/timothy Devlin Timothy Devlin (DE #4241) tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com James M. Lennon (DE #4570) jlennon@devlinlawfirm.com 1306 N. Broom St., 1st Floor Wilmington, Delaware 19806 Telephone: (302) 449-9010 Facsimile: (302) 353-4251 Attorneys for Plaintiff Magnacharge LLC Page 16 of 16