July 11, If you have any questions or concerns with the enclosed, please do not hesitate to contact. Very truly yours,

Similar documents
Fraser Trebilcock Davis & Dunlap, P.C.

December 5, Dear Ms. Kale:

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Consumers Energy Company s response to discovery question MEI-CE-328; and Proof of service.

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *

2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

ATTACHMENT 8

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

September 22, Via U.S. and Electronic Mail

September 26, Dear Ms. Kale:

May 4, Attached is The Detroit Edison Company s response to the Attorney General s Sixth Discovery Request. Also attached is a Proof of Service.

Schedule B-5. Michigan Public Service Commission Case No.: U Consumers Energy Company

VIA HAND DELIVERY. Re: Joshua S. Foster v. Appalachian Power Company P.S.C. Case No E-C. Dear Ms. Ferrell: July 17,2015

March 17, Very truly yours, PLUNKETT COONEY A T T O R N E Y S & C O U N S E L O R S A T L A W

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

ANSWER WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

March 14, Dorothy Wideman Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 6545 Mercantile Way Lansing, MI

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U338-E) NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

JOSEPH A. KEOUGH JR.* JEROME V. SWEENEY III* SEAN P. KEOUGH* STACI L. KOLB JEROME V. SWEENEY II OF COUNSEL

mew Doc 2823 Filed 03/13/18 Entered 03/13/18 15:59:56 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

MICHIGAN REGIONAL OFFICE

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *

EVERS. October 12, 2017

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) )

SAMPLE. This document is presented for guidance only and does not completely state either Oklahoma law or OCC regulations.

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U338-E) NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION

September 21, Docket No. ER

fo~ GUNSTER May2, 2016 E-PORTAL/ELECTRONIC FILING

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE MATTER : BEFORE THE SCHOOL

THIRTEENTH MONTHLY FEE AND EXPENSE STATEMENT OF MICHELMAN & ROBINSON LLP, SPECIAL COUNSEL TO LLOYD T. WHITAKER, LIQUIDATING TRUSTEE

Mika Meyers Beckett & Jones PLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

August 6, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Petitioner. CHANBOND LLC Patent Owner

Case 1:13-cv ML Document 194 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 6

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) MOTION FOR PARTY STATUS

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

mew Doc 867 Filed 07/11/17 Entered 07/11/17 15:53:25 Main Document Pg 1 of 3

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION

March 13, Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-853

Application : Broadcasting licence renewal for Super Channel (formerly Allarco Entertainment) Second Phase

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ENTERED Office of Proceedings July 27, 2016 Part of Public Record

Re: Processing or Issuing Land Patent to Silver State Land, LLC

PLANNING BOARD CITY OF BAYONNE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING MARCH 10, 2015

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

Case 2:09-cv PJD-PJK Document 19 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 216 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF WYOMING

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF THE ENTERPRISE WIRELESS ALLIANCE

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) MOTION FOR PARTY STATUS

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION

March 5, Ladies and Gentlemen:

APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW Please Print or Type

mew Doc 3067 Filed 04/12/18 Entered 04/12/18 16:16:40 Main Document Pg 1 of 4

IN THE VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) AMENDED APPLICATION

Re: Ruby Pipeline Project; Docket No. CP ; Response to Comments from Mr. Randy Largent, Landman for Newmont Mining Corporation

Textron/Harman Fair Fund c/o Analytics Consulting LLC P.O. Box 2011 Chanhassen, MN PROOF OF CLAIM FORM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : JOINT WITNESS LIST

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 29 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2018

Case 1:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF FULCRUM EXPLORATION, L.L.C. POOLING REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) )

OPPOSITION TO MOTION AS TO HAMED CLAIMS NOS. H-11 AND H-12: TWO CONDENSERS AND 100 SHOPPING CARTS

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Via Hand Delivery T-C Mineral County 911 v. Frontier West Virginia Inc. co M MU N I c AT I o N s

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:14-cv PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 7

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Karlinsky LLC 570 Lexington Avenue, Suite 1600 New York, NY Tel / Fax

KATZ, KANTOR 8c PERKING, PLLC

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA ALBEMARLE COMMISSION HERTFORD, NORTH CAROLINA

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) )

Case GLT Doc 747 Filed 07/20/17 Entered 07/20/17 14:44:10 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. SC VERIFIED MOTION FOR DAN K. WEBB TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE

BEFORE THE MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. SC VERIFIED MOTION FOR STUART ALTSCHULER TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE

NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS

Intrepid Energy Corporation

Attorneys for Applicant Insurance Commissioner of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

(A Sample Letter of Agreement for manuscript preparation) (Sample) Letter of Agreement

Phase 2 of 2009 General Rate Case Witness Qualifications

BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL BY THE COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES DECISION

STATE CONTRACTORS BOARD

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. Application Filed: July 29, Notice of Hearing: September 6, Hearing Held: September 27, 1996

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM AND ELECTRONIC MAIL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE OF NEVADA STATE CONTRACTORS BOARD. MINUTES OF THE MEETING November 16, 2011

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

Case 2:11-cv BSJ Document 2203 Filed 11/20/14 Page 1 of 5

Transcription:

124 West Allegan Street, Suite 1000 Lansing, Michigan 48933 T (517) 482-5800 F (517) 482-0887 www.fraserlawfirm.com Thomas J. Waters twaters@fraserlawfirm.com (517) 377-0811 July 11, 2017 Via Electronic Filing Ms. Kavita Kale, Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 W. Saginaw Hwy. Lansing, MI 48917 RE: MPSC Docket No. U-17678-R Reply Brief Dear Ms. Kale: Enclosed for filing in the above-referenced matter, please find the Reply Brief of Cadillac Renewable Energy, LLC, Genesee Power Station Limited Partnership, Grayling Generating Station Limited Partnership, Hillman Power Company, LLC, TES Filer City Station Limited Partnership, Viking Energy of Lincoln, Inc., and Viking Energy of McBain, Inc., along with Proof of Service of same. me. If you have any questions or concerns with the enclosed, please do not hesitate to contact Very truly yours, Fraser Trebilcock Davis & Dunlap, P.C. Thomas J. Waters sjo Enclosures FRASER TREBILCOCK DAVIS & DUNLAP PC LANSING DETROIT GRAND RAPIDS

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter of the application of ) CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY ) for the Reconciliation of Power Supply ) Cost Recovery (PSCR) Costs and ) Case No. U-17678-R Revenues for the Calendar Year 2015. ) ) REPLY BRIEF OF CADILLAC RENEWABLE ENERGY, LLC, GENESEE POWER STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, GRAYLING GENERATING STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, HILLMAN POWER COMPANY, LLC, TES FILER CITY STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, VIKING ENERGY OF LINCOLN, INC., AND VIKING ENERGY OF MCBAIN, INC. Dated: July 11, 2017 FRASER TREBILCOCK DAVIS & DUNLAP, P.C. Thomas J. Waters (P37829) David E. S. Marvin (P26564) Aaron L. Davis (P77406) Fraser Trebilcock Davis & Dunlap, P.C. 124 W. Allegan, Suite 1000 Lansing, MI 48933 Telephone: (517) 482-5800 E-mail addresses: twaters@fraserlawfirm.com adavis@fraserlawfirm.com

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. REPLY TO CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY... 1 II. CONCLUSION AND PRAYER FOR RELIEF... 3 i

NOW COME Cadillac Renewable Energy, LLC, Genesee Power Station Limited Partnership, Grayling Generating Station Limited Partnership, Hillman Power Company, LLC, TES Filer City Station Limited Partnership, Viking Energy of Lincoln, Inc., and Viking Energy of McBain, Inc. (collectively as the Biomass Merchant Plants or BMPs ), by and through their attorneys, Fraser Trebilcock Davis & Dunlap, P.C., and, pursuant to the schedule established by Administrative Law Judge Sharon L. Feldman ( ALJ ), submit this Reply Brief in support of the BMPs request for recovery of a portion of their fuel, variable operation and maintenance ( O&M ) and environmental costs pursuant to Sections 6a(7)-(9) of Public Act 286 of 2008, MCL 460.6a(7)-(9) ( Act 286 ). I. REPLY TO CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY The BMPs wish to address only a limited portion of Consumers' Initial Brief. Specifically, the BMPs wish to address statements on pages 8 and 12 of Consumers' Initial Brief where it states that: FRASER TREBILCOCK DAVIS & DUNLAP, P.C. LAWYERS LANSING, MICHIGAN 48933 In her direct testimony, Company witness Jenny L. Rickard addressed settlements with the Biomass Merchant Plants ( BMPs ) in accordance with the Commission s Order in MPSC Case No. U-16048 and pursuant to MCL 460.6a(7) and (8). 2 TR 225-226. The Company has Power Purchase Agreements ( PPAs ) with seven wood waste fueled BMPs. 2 TR 225. In 2015, the BMPs performed in accordance with their respective PPAs and were paid according to their terms. Based on invoices received, the Company believes that the BMPs incurred expense of approximately $11.6 million in 2015, which is subject to adjustment due to the limitation in monthly recoverable expense. 2 TR 226. As indicated on line 50, column (h) of Exhibit A-3 (MTD-3), based on invoices received, the Company believes that BMPs incurred a recoverable expense of $11,630,451 in 2015. (Consumers' Initial Brief, p 8) 1

Read in isolation, the last sentence of the foregoing might give rise to a potential ambiguity. Company witness Rickard's proposed recoverable expense of $11,630,451 is significantly less than the BMPs' requested recovery of $13,197,742. As Consumers' witness Hunley testified, however, Company witness Rickard's testimony should be disregarded for purposes of calculating the BMPs' 2015 cost adjustment: "As the adjustments in the testimony of Company witness Rickard do not relate to 2015 BMP costs, they should be disregarded for purposes of calculating the adjustment." 2 Tr 216. In its Initial Brief, Consumers further addresses the BMPs' costs as follows: Staff witness Gretchen M. Wagner presented a summary of Staff s adjustments to the Company s 2015 PSCR Reconciliation. 3 TR 676-679. Ms. Wagner alleged that the Company s overrecovery amount for the 2015 PSCR year was $19,753,728, which is inclusive of interest. 3 TR 679. Staff proposed five adjustments: (1) an increase of $50,010 to the Company s beginning balance as the result of the Commission s Final Order in MPSC Case No. U-17317-R; (2) the removal of the CSX Transportation, Inc. ( CSXT ) litigation costs that was included in fuel expense;... and (5) an increase in the December Purchased, Interchange & Renewable Power costs 3 TR 676-679. As indicated by Company witness Hunley, the Company adopted Staff s adjustments to the beginning overrecovery balance, the removal of the CSXT litigation costs, and the increase in the total Purchased and Interchange Power costs as it relates to the BMPs. 2 TR 214-215. (Consumers' Initial Brief, p 12) (emphasis added) The Staff's Initial Brief accepts the BMPs' requested cost recovery as follows: "Lastly, Staff did not propose any adjustment to the Biomass Merchant Plants' ("BMPs") costs." FRASER TREBILCOCK DAVIS & DUNLAP, P.C. LAWYERS LANSING, MICHIGAN 48933 (Staff's Initial Brief, p. 2) Thus, both the MPSC Staff and Consumers accepted the BMPs' claimed fuel and O&M costs of $13,197,742. 1 Moreover, neither the Staff nor Consumers, or any other party, 1 Exhibits BMP-1, line 27 and BMP-2, column E. 2

objected to TES Filer City's request for an additional $82,125 in CSAPR seasonal NOx allowance costs that are not subject to the statutory cap. Given the foregoing, the BMPs, Consumers, and the MPSC Staff all agree on the cost recovery to which the BMPs are entitled, $13,279,867. II. CONCLUSION AND PRAYER FOR RELIEF The BMPs respectfully request that the ALJ issue a PFD recommending the following findings and conclusions: 1. The BMPs are eligible, under MCL 460.6a(7), to recover, subject to the statutory cap, the amount of their actual reasonably and prudently incurred fuel and variable O&M costs that exceeded the amount that the BMPs were paid for those costs pursuant to their contracts with Consumers Energy Company. 2. A CPI adjustment, under MCL 460.6a(8), of 10.478379% is reasonable and appropriate. 3. The Commission should approve as the capped statutory amount to be paid to the BMPs by Consumers Energy for costs incurred by the BMPs during 2015. 4. The method for allocating the $13,197,742 in capped statutory payments to the BMPs reflected in Exhibits BMP-1 and BMP-2 should be approved. 5. In addition to the monthly capped statutory payments, $82,125 in CSAPR NOx allowance costs should be approved for uncapped recovery by TES as costs incurred due to changes in federal or state environmental laws or regulations implemented after October 6, 2008. FRASER TREBILCOCK DAVIS & DUNLAP, P.C. LAWYERS LANSING, MICHIGAN 48933 6. In total, $13,279,867 in statutory payments to the BMPs should be approved in this proceeding. 7. Consumers Energy should release the 20% hold-back, plus interest, to the BMPs within five business days of a final order issued in this proceeding, consistent with the procedures approved in MPSC Case No. U-16048. 3

Respectfully submitted, FRASER TREBILCOCK DAVIS & DUNLAP, P.C. Attorneys for Cadillac Renewable Energy, LLC, Genesee Power Station Limited Partnership, Grayling Generating Station Limited Partnership, Hillman Power Company, LLC, TES Filer City Station Limited Partnership, Viking Energy of Lincoln, Inc., and Viking Energy of McBain, Inc. Date: July 11, 2017 By: Thomas J. Waters (P37829) Business Address: 124 W. Allegan, Suite 1000 Lansing, MI 48933 Telephone: (517) 482-5800 E-mail:twaters@fraserlawfirm.com FRASER TREBILCOCK DAVIS & DUNLAP, P.C. LAWYERS LANSING, MICHIGAN 48933 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter of the application of ) CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY ) for the Reconciliation of Power Supply ) Case No. U-17678-R Cost Recovery (PSCR) Costs and ) Revenues for the Calendar Year 2015 ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Susan J. Oberlin certifies that on the 11 th day of July, 2017, she served a copy of the Reply Brief of Cadillac Renewable Energy, LLC, Genesee Power Station Limited Partnership, Grayling Generating Station Limited Partnership, Hillman Power Company, LLC, TES Filer City Station Limited Partnership, Viking Energy Of Lincoln, Inc., and Viking Energy Of McBain, Inc., upon the parties identified on the attached service list via e-mail.

Administrative Law Judge Hon. Sharon Feldman Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 W. Saginaw Hwy. Lansing, MI 48917 feldmans@michigan.gov Counsel for Consumers Energy Company Robert W. Beach Anne M. Uitvlugt Gary A. Gensch, Jr. Consumers Energy Company One Energy Plaza Jackson, MI 489201 mpscfilings@cmsenergy.com Robert.beach@cmsenergy.com Anne.uitvlugt@cmsenergy.com Gary.gensch@cmsenergy.com Counsel for Michigan Public Service Commission Staff Lauren Donofrio Bryan Brandenburg Assistant Attorney General 7109 W. Saginaw Hwy. Lansing, MI 48917 donofriol@michigan.gov brandenburgb@michigan.gov Counsel for Michigan Environmental Council (MEC) / Sierra Club Christopher Bzdok Tracy Jane Andrews Olson Bzdok & Howard 420 E. Front Street Traverse City, MI 49686 chris@envlaw.com tjandrews@envlaw.com Kimberley@envlaw.com karla@envlaw.com SERVICE LIST Case No. U-17678-R 2

Michael Soules 1625 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Ste. 702 Washington, DC 20036 msoules@earthjustice.org Counsel for AG Bill Schuette John A. Janiszewski Michael E. Moody 525 W. Ottawa St., 6 th Floor PO Box 30755 Lansing, MI 48909 JaniszewskiJ2@michigan.gov Moodym2@michigan.gov Joel King Michigan Department of Attorney General ENRA Division PO Box 30755 Lansing, MI 48909 Kingj38@michigan.gov Counsel for Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership David R. Whitfield Warner Norcross & Judd LLP 900 Fifth Third Center 111 Lyon Street, NW Grand Rapids, MI 49503 dwhitfield@wnj.com 3