C R I O P. a scenario based risk analysis of control centres.

Similar documents
Identification and Reduction of Risks in Remote Operations of Offshore Oil and Gas Installations

Are Cognitive and organizational human factors missing from the blunt end in the oil and gas industry?

IPTC PP. changes. A survey is planned to follow up on the results to elaborate the findings in the study.

Offshore Wind Risks - Issues and Mitigations

An expanded role. ABB s 800xA Simulator is now being used throughout the complete life cycle of an automation system

Keeping Your House in order?

Workshop. HF Guidelines for off-shore CCTV systems

Offshoredag Esbjerg, Elise Thorud, May 31st, 2012 Operator Training Simulator. ABB Group June 4, 2012 Slide 1

Technology keynote. A connected future? Arnstein Eknes, Segment dir. Offshore Service Vessels, DNV GL 27 June 2018 DNV GL

IFE/HR/E-2017/002. Human factors in the design of control rooms for ESS

The Norwegian Context PTIL/PSA 1

Risk regulatory regimes of the Norwegian Petroleum Sector and the Nordic model. Professor Ole Andreas Engen, University of Stavanger, Norway

afdruk: 17 oktober 2014 blz. 1

Republic of Moldova, Romania and Ukraine

National Academies Committee Performance-Based Regulation

TECHNOLOGY QUALIFICATION MANAGEMENT

Totally Integrated Power (TIP) for the Oil and Gas Industry

Real-Time Data-to-Information Systems for Improved Decison- Making in Production Optimization

What made Norway a deepwater hub

Virtual Reality Immersion: A Tool for Early Human Factors Intervention

The robotized field operator

Optimizing wind farms

Industry Response - Post Macondo

ESSENTIAL PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT FOR MANAGING MULTIPLE OIL AND GAS ASSETS

This is SINTEF May Technology for a better society

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Commercial Human Spaceflight: Self-regulation is the Future

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CMC SERVICES

New concepts are emerging frequently in various fields such as: microprocessor sensors,

Autonomous ships the end of human error?

Project BONUS ESABALT

7 Briefing. Responsible investor

NEBOSH INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CERTIFICATE IN OIL & GAS OPERATIONAL SAFETY BY DISTANCE LEARNING

Goals, progress and difficulties with regard to the development of German nuclear standards on the example of KTA 2000

Defining the New Normal for Offshore Drilling Copenhagen 16 June Alan Spackman Vice President, Offshore Regulatory & Technical Affairs

Author s Name Name of the Paper Session. DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE October 10-11, 2017 SENSORS SESSION. Sensing Autonomy.

Impact assessment of offshore oil activities in the Arctic

INTERNATIONAL. Medical device software Software life cycle processes

HSE and Quality. Sisimiut, 10th December FING: Arctic Region Oil & Gas Seminar in Training and Education

European Wind Energy Technology Roadmap

THE USE OF A SAFETY CASE APPROACH TO SUPPORT DECISION MAKING IN DESIGN

Onshore & Offshore Engineering and Management of Subsea Cables and Pipelines

Couplings used for torque transmission in propulsion or auxiliary plants

SMARTFISH H INNOVATION FOR SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES. Hanne Digre, PhD, Research Director, SINTEF Ocean Seminar, Brussel 9 th of October 2018

SUMMARY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE PREVENTION OF MARINE OIL POLLUTION IN THE ARCTIC.

Welcome to the PhD study at NTNU

4 Briefing. Responsible investor

Industry & Govt Changes Post Macondo

The EUR: a great achievement and still on its way Eric de FRAGUIER, EDF EUR Steering Committee Chairman

Using Norwegian competence from oil and gas subsea operations towards the development of ocean mining operations

CAN WE IDENTIFY POTENTIAL MAJOR HAZARDS?

DROPS Forum Perth, Australia - 3 November 2011 Innovative services aimed at People, Systems and Equipment

Foresight for aviation industry in Russia

DOC-CAREERS II Project, Final conference Brussels 2012 University-Industry Intellectual property rights: Balancing interests

Coiled-tubing operations and basic tools

Application of Remote Real-Time Monitoring to Offshore Oil and Gas Operations. Dissemination Workshop. September 22, 2016

IWCF Well Control Level 5. Celle Drilling Conference 2017

Systems. Professor Vaughan Pomeroy. The LRET Research Collegium Southampton, 11 July 2 September 2011

Applying systems thinking to safety assurance of Nuclear Power Plants

25 July 2017 Without prejudice [PROVISIONS IN RELATION TO TRADE IN GOODS ALREADY INCLUDED IN THE EU TEXT PROPOSAL FOR THE TRADE IN GOODS CHAPTER]

ETSON: Role and activities for harmonizing safety assessment practices. Benoit De Boeck ETSON President. N2017 ETSON - Pitesti (May 2017) 1

Umbilicals and Subsea Power Cables Excellence in Connecting Subsea EWEA

PROPOSED DOCUMENT. Global Harmonization Task Force. Title: Medical Devices: Post Market Surveillance: Content of Field Safety Notices

MULTI-PURPOSE FLOATING STRUCTURES Øyvind Hellan Vice President Research, SINTEF Ocean

Trends that are shaping the future of process automation

Human Factors Engineering in FLNG Projects D. Chandrasegaran, H. Al Sharifi, M.H. Mohd Noor, and M.K. Abdullah, TechnipFMC

* Image courtesy of H-L-Andersen. Scanning in Explosive Environments Offshore

Petroleum Safety Levy Methodology. Decision Paper

Industry & Govt Changes Post Macondo. Charlie Williams Chief Scientist Shell Executive Director - Center for Offshore Safety

FINAL DOCUMENT. Title: Medical Devices Post Market Surveillance: Content of Field Safety Notices. Endorsed by: The Global Harmonization Task Force

MORE SUBSEA ULTRA LONGER REMOTE INCREASED HIGH TEMP & PROJECTS DEEP WATER STEP-OUTS LOCATIONS RECOVERY PRESSURE

DNVGL-CP-0212 Edition March 2016

Sensors, Tools and the Common Operating Picture. Sensors, Tools and the Common Operating Picture 14 th April Middleburg

Use of the Bowtie Methodology in the Generic Pre-Construction Safety Report (GDA PCSR) for Advanced Water Cooled NPPs

SPE A Systematic Approach to Well Integrity Management Alex Annandale, Marathon Oil UK; Simon Copping, Expro

Bruce L. Graves /01/$ IEEE. IEEE Industry Applications Magazine PhotoDisc, Inc.

Engineering and Design

Performance-Based Safety Regulation

Technology Challenges Offshore. Anna Aabø President IRIS research

Oil&Gas Subsea Production

Offshore wind. A new journey, a proven track record

ENGINEERING INNOVATION

SAFETY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES AND THEIR APPLICATION IN DEVELOPMENT OF NEAR SURFACE WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES ASAM PROJECT

The project. The implementation phase 17/10/2014. Effects of insufficient human factors focus in a design phase of new automated technology.

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Petroleum and natural gas industries Offshore production installations Basic surface process safety systems

Presentation. Professor II Jan Erik Vinnem University of Stavanger.

Wind Energy Technology Roadmap

Integrity Management of Offshore Assets

Air pollution control in a new oil and gas developments using best available techniques

OIL & GAS UPSTREAM SECTOR PRESENTATION NAMIBIA PETROLEUM OPERATOR ASSOCIATION. Mr Dennis Zekveld Vice Chair NAMPOA 25 April 2018

Petroleum Safety Authority Norway Trends in Risk Level Risk Level Measuring Scheme

33 rd International North Sea Flow Measurement Workshop October 2015

Tore Aarsland. Chairman of the Editorial Revision Committee / Senior Design C6 Technologies. 10-Jan-13

One-Stop Solution for Foundation Design

Deepwater Oil Exploration Drilling Safety: The Cuban Regulatory Approach Panel discussion: One Gulf - Drilling Offshore Cuba

Oil and Gas UK Well Integrity Guidelines

SUBSEA 7 AND GRANHERNE ALLIANCE. Engaging Early to Deliver Value

OCEAN SPACE CENTRE An evaluation of incentive effects

Self-Introduction and PhD Plan

NEBOSH TRAINING COURSES

Transcription:

C R I O P a scenario based risk analysis of control centres

CRIOP verification and validation of control centre CRIOP is a human factors (HF) based method to verify and validate the ability of a control centre to safely and efficiently handle all modes of operation. CRIOP is based on ISO 11064 Ergonomic design of control centres. CRIOP goes thru checklists, potential accident scenarios and identifies critical actions in a Human-factor perspective. CRIOP has been successfully applied to prevent accidents in the Norwegian oil industry for 15 years. CRIOP identifies need for change early in the design phase. This is far less expensive than changes made later in the process.

CRIOP interaction analysis CRIOP analyses the interaction between operators and technical system thru checklists and during selected critical scenarios. The aim is to prevent major accidents. CRIOP is suitable both for the design phase and operations of new control rooms or modifications. CRIOP is handling all modes of operations, including: - Start up - Normal operations - Maintenance - Revision maintenance - Process disturbances - Safety critical situations - Shut down CRIOP was originally made for offshore systems and offshore control-rooms. It may also be applied to other industries and other control-rooms systems such as nuclear power plants or control cabins in trains or boats.

Areas of application The present CRIOP methodology is customized for offshore and onshore control centers. Areas of application are: - Central control rooms - Control centers (used in e-operations) e - Driller's cabins - Cranes - Emergency control-rooms rooms (onshore / offshore) - Integrated Operations (e-operations) The methodology can also be used for other purposes, e.g.: - The driving cabin of a train - The command bridge of a boat The "control room" can be a centralized room, a collection of distributed control rooms or a number of interconnected panels and cabins. The scope of a full CRIOP analysis is between 2 to 5 days of effort. A detailed description can be found free of charge on the CRIOP-web pages: Assistance for carrying out the CRIOP-analysis can be required see also.

CRIOP - a risk analysis method Risk analysis is a proactive approach that enables us to identify and assess accident risks before they cause major loss. CRIOP is a method for identification and evaluation of accident or risks in the control room. Performing risk analysis speeds up the learning process both for the operators and the managers of the system. Properly executed risk analysis of systems will reveal hazards corresponding to many years of accident experience from the same types of systems. CRIOP measures the risk in terms of consequences of human errors. SHE-legislation (Safety, Health and Environment) tends to replace prescriptive requirements with goaloriented requirements. Compliance with such requirements often has to be documented through risk analyses. CRIOP identifies missing compliance with these goal-oriented requirements already in the design phase of a project. This is done through the use of checklists and scenario analysis,

Minimizing the cost of changes and modifications The cost of changes increases significantly through the phases in the design process. Experience shows that the cost of a change increases exponentially between each phase, an example is: 1000-10 000 $ 10 000-100 000$ 100 000-1 000 000$ 1 000 000-10 000 000$ in the analysis phase in the design phase in the build phase in the operations phase The customer should decide which of the phases of the project they want to carry out a CRIOP analysis. The major operators in Norway have decided to use CRIOP in the design phase, the build phase and in the operations phase (after 1 years of operation experience). The CRIOP methodology identifies problems early in the design process and thus is reducing the risk for costly changes at a later stage in the project.

How to carry out a CRIOP analysis A Criop analysis consists of two main parts. The first part is a review of the plant s control centre. This includes a checklist review, based on best practices, standards and regulations. The second part of the CRIOP analysis is a scenario-based risk analysis. This allows us to investigate possible future accidents in detail. The scenario analysis starts by selecting key scenarios. Then studying the operators interventions to control disturbances that may lead to major hazards or accidents. The CRIOP process consists of four work tasks: Areas that are checked: Prepare and organize the CRIOP analysis General Analysis / Checklist review Scenario Analysis Implementation and follow up of actions Layout Working environment Control- and safety systems, man- machine interfaces Job Organisation Procedures and work description Training and competence e-operations, remote operations, Integrated Operations CRIOP is used in verification and validation of the controlroom. When used in the design phase the focus is on the controlroom arrangements and the man-machine interfaces. When used in preparing start-up the focus will be on emergency preparedness, organization, operators training and working procedures. When choosing a scenario for the CRIOP analysis, a relevant scenario is selected based on experience or future trends.

CRIOP developed by Hydro, Saga, Elf and SINTEF SINTEF is the largest independent research organization in Scandinavia (www.sintef.no). Turnover 2005 was USD 260 Mill. SINTEF generates new knowledge and solutions for our customers, based on research and development in technology, the natural sciences, medicine and the social sciences. The vision of SINTEF is: Technology for a better society The first version of the CRIOP method was published in 1990. The method has been developed based on experiences of accidents and best practices, for use during the design of new offshore installations. CRIOP was a result of a cooperation between SINTEF and the Norwegian oil and gas industry with special support from Norsk Hydro, Saga and Elf. CRIOP went trough a major revision in 2003 initiated by Norsk Hydro. This included new standards such as ISO 11064, new regulations, recent research, technical developments, remote operations/e-operations, and user experiences from the Norwegian oil and gas industry. SINTEF is a non-profit organization and wish to improve control room safety and plant safety through offering the CRIOP method free of charge from their web pages. Responsible at SINTEF are: Stig Ole Johnsen: Camilla Tveiten: Lars Bodsberg: Knut Øien: Stig.O.Johnsen@sintef.no Camilla.Tveiten@sintef.no Lars.Bodsberg@sintef.no Knut.Oien@sintef.no C R I O P