Short Term Aircraft Noise Monitoring Pacifica

Similar documents
Portable Noise Monitoring Report March 5 - April 24, 2016 The Museum of Vancouver. Vancouver Airport Authority

DOWNWIND LEG NOISE MONITORING SUMMARY REPORT

Noise monitoring report

FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Contents

Technical Report NOISE MONITORING PROGRAM

A REPORT OF MONITORING OF AIRCRAFT NOISE FROM STANSTED AIRPORT AT HELIONS BUMPSTEAD, ESSEX BETWEEN SEPTEMBER AND DECEMBER 2008

City and Borough of Juneau

SUMMARY REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT FELBRIDGE NOVEMBER 2010 TO OCTOBER 2011

CHAPTER 3 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING OF TUTUR1C SID TRIAL AT EDINBURGH AIRPORT AUGUST TO NOVEMBER 2015 SITE 2: UPHALL

SUMMARY REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT MEATH GREEN OCTOBER 2010 TO SEPTEMBER 2011

PROPOSED MARYWOOD DEVELOPMENT

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT HEVER FEBRUARY 2011 TO JANUARY 2012

Welcome & Introductions

WesPac Pittsburg Energy Infrastructure Project. Noise Assessment Report

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT HAYWARDS HEATH OCTOBER 2011 TO NOVEMBER 2012

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DUBLIN AIRPORT NOISE AND FLIGHT TRACK MONITORING SYSTEM NOISE MONITORING SUMMARY REPORT JANUARY JUNE 2016

Aircraft Noise Monitoring Data from Noise Monitoring Terminals (NMTs)

Bancroft & Piedmont Cellular Facility

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Acoustics Unattended monitoring of aircraft sound in the vicinity of airports

UC Berkeley Northside Relocation Cellular Facility

Report on Some Quantitative Measurements of Aircraft Overflight Noise in Palo Alto

[MACNOMS VALIDATION STUDY] Metropolitan Airports Commission. Noise Program Office

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT LEIGH SEPTEMBER 2011 TO NOVEMBER 2012

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT DOMEWOOD DECEMBER 2012 TO DECEMBER 2013

Oakland International Airport Master Plan Update

NOISE MEASUREMENT RESULTS

2.0 AVIATION NOISE 2.1 MEASUREMENT OF SOUND

Appendix 8. Draft Post Construction Noise Monitoring Protocol

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT COWDEN JULY 2014 TO JUNE 2016

Appendix L Noise Technical Report. Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge

2.8 NOISE. Chapter IX 2. Comments and Responses CONSTRUCTION NOISE. Comment

Swan DH Noise Impact Assessment Report

Noise Monitoring 2009 Springbank Airport

Part 150 Presentation

APPENDIX G NOISE G.1 BACKGROUND AND CHARACTERISTICS OF NOISE

Terms of Reference of Aircraft Noise at IGI Airport, New Delhi

Black. LWECS Site Permit. Stearns County. Permit Section:

Cymbaluk Noise Complaints

Background Ambient Noise Study Rosemont Copper

RESULTS AND METHODOLOGIES OF AIRPORT NOISE STUDIES

MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT OF AIRCRAFT NOISE IN AN AIRPORT S NEIGHBORHOOD. M. K. Law, 1 and K. M. Li 2

Appendix F Noise and Vibration

Airport / Community Roundtable Meeting No. 266 Overview Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Noise Mitigation Study Pilot Program Summary Report Contract No

JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT ORANGE COUNTY AGENDA STAFF REPORT ATTACHMENT A RESULTS OF THE SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON OF NOISE MONITORING SYSTEMS

Problems with the INM: Part 1 Lateral Attenuation

Our noise modelling using INM. May 2015

Pre-Construction Sound Study. Velco Jay Substation DRAFT. January 2011 D A T A AN AL Y S IS S OL U T I ON S

BASELINE NOISE MONITORING SURVEY

Noise Impact Analysis

Memorandum 1.0 Highway Traffic Noise

Black Butte Copper Project Mine Operating Permit Application (Revision 3)

A comparing overview on ECAC Doc.29 3 rd Edition and the new German AzB

Preliminary Results of Noise Monitoring in 1995 in Bryce Canyon National Park

Fundamentals of Environmental Noise Monitoring CENAC

Assured Monitoring Group

Raging River Quarry. Environmental Noise Monitoring Protocol Provisional Operations 11/30/2016

TigerShark UAS Level Flyover Noise Measurements

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF APRIL 29, 2013 MAY 05, 2013)

06/25/13 CUP prepared for: June 20, prepared by: Earl Mullins, PE. architectural environmental and industrial noise control

NOISE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING. February 18, :00 pm 6:30 pm Portland Jetport Main Conference Room

Appendix B: Noise Study

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF NOVEMBER 25, 2013 DECEMBER 01, 2013)

Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. Assessment of Measured Aircraft Noise Levels

A method to calculate ambient aircraft background noise

NOISE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING. October 22, :00 pm 7:30 pm Portland Jetport Main Conference Room

CORRECTION NOTICE SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY CIVIL AVIATION ACT, 2009 (ACT NO. 13 OF 2009)

South Orange County Reliability Enhancement Project

Background Information on Noise and its Measurement

TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK.

Further Investigations of Low-frequency Noise Problem Generated by Freight Trains

Techniques used by ERCD for the Measurement and Analysis of Aircraft Noise and Radar Data

The Six Ideas. A Quieter Operations Roadmap. Presented by NAV CANADA & GTAA to Transport Canada June 18, 2018

The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics community mechanical noise study for the City of St. Petersburg.

Liddell Coal Operations

Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. Assessment of Measured Aircraft Noise Levels [Appended] February 16, 2017

APPENDIX G-4 NOISE MONITORING REPORT

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF JANUARY 27, 2014 FEBRUARY 2, 2014)

Problems with the INM: Part 2 Atmospheric Attenuation

USER MANUAL VOLANS PUBLIC DISPLAY FOR JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT

Dallas Love Field Day-Night Average Sound Level Contours. HMMH Report No April Prepared for:

Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals

McGill Environmental Ltd.

Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria

Environmental Noise Assessment Pa ia Relief Route Project Pa ia, Maui County, Hawaii

Response to the London City Airport Noise Action Plan By Plane Hell Action

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF JUNE 30, 2014 JULY 06, 2014)

Appendix B. Airport Master Plan Update William R. Fairchild International Airport Port Angeles, Washington AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN CHECKLIST

AMERICAN UNIVERSITY EAST CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. Environmental Noise Study. Project Number

ABSTRACT. Noise Monitoring Results. from. The USAF atmospheric interceptor technology (ait) launch From the Kodiak Launch Complex (KLC)

Subject: Pappy s Grill and Sports Bar DJ System Acoustical Isolation Study

Noise Study Report. Addendum. Interstate 10 Corridor Project. In the Counties of San Bernardino and Los Angeles

3.3 NOISE Introduction Definition of Resource

Roof top of Ash Lagoon decantrate pump house Existing Ching Lam noise monitoring station

Verification of Heathrow Noise and Track keeping System Status update. Henk Veerbeek, January 25 th, 2016

NETWORK RAIL BORDERS RAILWAY OPERATIONAL NOISE AND VIBRATION (YEAR 1, ROUND 2) REP-003. September 2016

Bickerdike Allen Partners

CALGARY SOUTHEAST STONEY TRAIL Detailed Design 17th Avenue SE to Macleod Trail South (Hwy 2A) Calgary, Alberta

Transcription:

Short Term Aircraft Noise Monitoring Pacifica Prepared for the Vallemar Neighborhood Noise Abatement Office P.O. Box 8097 San Francisco, CA 94128 (650) 821 5100 Technical Report #032016 P51 981 February 2016

Page 1 Executive Summary The (SFO) Noise Abatement Office conducted short term noise monitoring in Pacifica, to determine the noise level within the Vallemar neighborhood from aircraft operations at SFO. One monitoring location was selected that is near the departure corridor with the assistance of a Pacifica resident. The overall average daily noise level from all aircraft was only 40dBA CNEL. The Community daily noise level was 51dBA CNEL. Noise from all aircraft over Pacifica did not increase the total average daily noise level at this monitoring site. Introduction The equipment used to measure the sound level was an Environmental Monitor Unit 2200 noise monitor and Type 41DM 2 microphone manufactured by Bruel & Kjaer. The measurements consisted of monitoring the A weighted decibels (dba) in accordance with procedures and equipment which comply with International Electrotechnical Commission, and measurement standards established by the American National Standards Institute for Type I instrumentation. The microphone was calibrated prior to the start of the measurement. The monitor was housed in a weatherproof case and powered by a standard exterior electrical wall outlet. The microphone was mounted on a tripod at a height of approximately 7 feet (see Figure 1). The sound levels at the site were continuously monitored and the results stored on the onboard memory and periodically transferred to a removable memory stick for decoding. The decoded noise data were then processed in the Airport Noise and Operations Management System (ANOMS) for identification, noise to flight track matching and Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) metric calculations. Aircraft Noise Analysis Noise measurements were taken at 100 block of Nataqua Avenue starting December 4, 2015 to December 15, 2015 using a sound level threshold of 55dBA from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and 50dBA from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. This report evaluates periods where full 24 hour days of data are available, from December 5 through December 14. There were 27 identified correlated aircraft noise events associated with other Bay Area airports and 279 identified correlated aircraft noise events associated with SFO operations over the 10 day period. Table 1 below lists these events, along with community noise events detected by date and events daily energy averages. Table 1 Noise Events by Date

Page 2 Table 2 below provides the resulting CNELs for this measurement period, while Tables 3, 4 and 5 provides details of SFO Events by Daytime, Evening and Nighttime hours. For the 306 aircraft noise events, the average aircraft generated Maximum Noise Level (Lmax) was 60dBA, the average Sound Exposure Level (SEL) was 71dBA, and the average aircraft noise event duration was 23 seconds. The computed levels for the average Aircraft CNEL was 40dBA, the average Community CNEL was 51dBA, and the Total CNEL was 51dBA. For comparison purposes, the cumulative aircraft noise level at permanent noise monitor #19 (Fairmont) located approximately 3.2 miles northwest was 62dBA for the same period. Table 2 Community Noise Equivalent Level over 10 Days Community Noise Equivalent Level Lowest Level (dba) Highest Level (dba) Average Level (dba) Aircraft (All) 29 43 40 Community 43 54 51 Total 43 55 51 Table 3 SFO Aircraft Noise Data (Single Events) Day (7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.) 184 Correlated Noise Events Lowest Level (dba) Highest Level (dba) Average Level (dba) Aircraft Lmax 56 72 61 Aircraft SEL 64 83 71 Noise Event Duration (in seconds) 8 seconds 55 seconds 21 seconds Table 4 SFO Aircraft Noise Data (Single Events) Evening (7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.) 37 Correlated Noise Events Lowest Level (dba) Highest Level (dba) Average Level (dba) Aircraft Lmax 56 66 60 Aircraft SEL 63 76 70 Noise Event Duration (in seconds) 8 seconds 37 seconds 19 seconds Table 5 SFO Aircraft Noise Data (Single Events) Night (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) 58 Correlated Noise Events Lowest Level (dba) Highest Level (dba) Average Level (dba) Aircraft Lmax 51 67 59 Aircraft SEL 59 76 70 Noise Event Duration (in seconds) 8 seconds 120 seconds 32 seconds

Page 3 All aircraft overflights, which flew within a cylindrical airspace of 2 miles in radius and 15,000 feet in height; centered on the measurement location were evaluated for this measurement period. A daily average of 144 overflights penetrated this airspace. An average of 22% (or 31 noise events per day) exceeded the two thresholds used to detect aircraft noise, and registered events on the noise monitor. Table 6 below details the amount of daily overflights versus aircraft noise events. Appendix 2 lists these events by Aircraft Type and their Maximum Noise Level. Table 6 Aircraft Overflights versus Noise Events

Page 4 Conclusion Aircraft noise levels in the Vallemar neighborhood of Pacifica are at levels expected in a community that is approximately 4.3 miles away from a large hub airport, but below several departure corridors serving four main commercial use runways (28L, 28R, 1L, 1R) at SFO. Aircraft noise measurements contribute 0.9dBA additional noise to the total cumulative average noise levels. The average Aircraft CNEL was 40dBA and the average Community CNEL was 51dBA. When Aircraft noise is added to the Community noise the Total CNEL does not increase and remains the same as Community CNEL. Aircraft CNEL Community CNEL CNEL (dba) 70 60 50 40 30 20 65dBA CNEL Noise Standard 10 0 The California Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Division 2.5, Chapter 6, paragraph 5012 states, The standard for the acceptable level of aircraft noise for persons living in the vicinity of airports is hereby established to be a community noise equivalent level of 65 decibels. Since the average Aircraft CNEL was measured at 40dBA for the Vallemar neighborhood, this residential area has an acceptable level of aircraft noise as defined by state law. The extent of the 65dBA CNEL noise impact contour at SFO is shown on page 4. This noise contour was generated using Federal Aviation Administration s Integrated Noise Model (version 7.0d). The Federal Aviation Administration accepted this map as part of the Noise Exposure Map update under Federal Aviation Regulations Part 150 on January 29, 2016. The results of the field monitoring validates the extent of the 65dBA CNEL noise impact boundary confirming Aircraft CNEL is less than 65dBA CNEL for this location.

Page 5 2014 Noise Exposure Map 65dB CNEL Noise Contour 981 Vallemar

Page 6 Figure 1 Microphone and Tripod (main) and Monitor (bottom right)

Page 7 Figure 2 Monitoring Location #981 (red circle 2 mile radius) and Permanent Noise Monitor Sites (blue circles)

Page 8 Appendix 1 San Francisco Bay Area Major Jet Arrival and Departure Routes West Flow Plan

Page 9 Southeast Flow Plan

Page 10 Appendix 2 Noise Measurement Data Results

Page 11

Page 12

Page 13

Page 14

Page 15

Page 16

Page 17

Page 18

Page 19

Page 20

Page 21