Evaluation Results of Airport Surface Multilateration. Hiromi Miyazaki Electronic Navigation Research Institute

Similar documents
[EN 105] Evaluation Results of Airport Surface Multilateration

Evaluation Results of Multilateration at Narita International Airport

Ron Turner Technical Lead for Surface Systems. Syracuse, NY. Sensis Air Traffic Systems - 1

SURVEILLANCE MONITORING OF PARALLEL PRECISION APPROACHES IN A FREE FLIGHT ENVIRONMENT. Carl Evers Dan Hicok Rannoch Corporation

ICAO AFI/MID ASBU IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP. Cairo, November 2015

Automatic Dependent Surveillance -ADS-B

SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS. Operational Improvement and Cost Savings, from Airport Surface to Airspace

ATM-ASDE System Cassiopeia-5

Introduction to: Radio Navigational Aids

DEVELOPMENT OF PASSIVE SURVEILLANCE RADAR

Exelis FIS-B: Status & Future Presentation for Friends & Partners in Aviation Weather 2014

Airmanship Knowledge Learning Outcome 1 Air Traffic Control

EVOLUTION OF AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE

BEYOND RADAR ERA ATM SOLUTIONS

Investigation of Runway Incursion Prevention Systems

EE Chapter 14 Communication and Navigation Systems

total airport solutions systemsinterface

10 Secondary Surveillance Radar

Regional and Inter-Regional Seminar and Workshop on Search and Rescue

Small Airport Surveillance Sensor (SASS)

Chapter Four AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN SET COMPONENTS

Modern surveillance system. Punctual and space distributed system. ADS-B and MLAT modern view & evolution

A Review of Vulnerabilities of ADS-B

Surveillance Strategy

APPENDIX C VISUAL AND NAVIGATIONAL AIDS

Guidance Material for ILS requirements in RSA

ATM INDRA ADS-B SYSTEM AUTOMATIC DEPENDANT SURVEILLANCE BROADCAST JULY -2014

ICAO SARPS AND GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS ON SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL (ASP) Working Group Meeting. Montreal, 15 to 19 October Draft Manual on Multilateration Surveillance

Next Generation Air. Surveillance Sector. Federal Aviation Administration Transportation. By: Rick Castaldo Date: June 19, 2007

INDRA SURVEILLANCE: ADS-B/MLAT. April 2015

Reducing Test Flights Using Simulated Targets and a Carefully Chosen Set-up

Airfield Obstruction and Navigational Aid Surveys

Performance Based Surveillance & New Sensors technology

Intelligent Surveillance and Management Functions for Airfield Applications Based on Low Cost Magnetic Field Detectors. Publishable Executive Summary

WRC-12 Implications for Terrestrial Services other than Mobile Broadband. John Mettrop BDT Expert. Scope

Regulations. Aeronautical Radio Service

Appendix B. Airport Master Plan Update William R. Fairchild International Airport Port Angeles, Washington AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN CHECKLIST

Alternate Position, Navigation & Time APNT for Civil Aviation

MARITIME, AIRBORNE AND LAND RADAR

Understanding ADS-B traffic

SURVEILLANCE DATA EXCHANGE. Part 18 : Category 019. Multilateration System Status Messages

GA and NextGen How technologies like WAAS and ADS-B will change your flying! Presented By Claire Kultgen

Alternative Positioning, Navigation & Timing (APNT) Study Update

WIDE AREA MULTILATERATION system

Advanced RADAR techniques

GBAS FOR ATCO. June 2017

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

Optimized LED Architecture based on a Parallel Circuit

LOCALIZATION WITH GPS UNAVAILABLE

NAVIGATION INSTRUMENTS - BASICS

DEVELOPMENT OF MOBILE PASSIVE SECONDARY SURVEILLANCE RADAR

The Impact of Choice of Roofing Material on Navaids Wave Polarization

Advisory Circular. Precision Approach Path Indicator Harmonization with Instrument Landing System

WIND FARMS IMPACT ON TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES. University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)

COMPARISON OF SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGIES ICAO

ADS-B Ruling and FreeFlight Systems new ADS-B solutions

Wide Area Surveillance using SSR Mode S Multilateration: advantages and limitations

Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches.

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F.1097 * (Question ITU-R 159/9)

North Winnipeg Antenna System Project. February 2018

EMMA2 Operational Concept

Communication and Navigation Systems for Aviation

Navy Landing System Overview

AIREON SPACE-BASED ADS-B

RFeye Arrays. Direction finding and geolocation systems

Copyrighted Material - Taylor & Francis

ICAO Handbook on Radio Frequency Spectrum Requirements for Civil Aviation Vol. I - ICAO Spectrum Strategy Vol. II - Frequency Planning

BEYOND RADAR ERA MILITARY SOLUTIONS. Surveillance Reconnaissance Military ATM Command&Control Systems

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Arqiva DAB Car receiver tests in the UK

AE4-393: Avionics Exam Solutions

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Operational Concept for a complete A-SMGCS

Impact of ATC transponder transmission to onboard GPS-L5 signal environment

2. Radar receives and processes this request, and forwards it to Ground Datalink Processor (in our case named GRATIS)

ATC-Wake: Integrated Air Traffic Control Wake Vortex Safety and Capacity System

MIDANPIRG CNS SG/7 Meeting Cairo, Egypt, 31May - 2June 2016

Technical Provisions for Mode S Services and Extended Squitter

Bayesian Filter to accurately track airport moving objects

Lincoln Laboratory. art 3 0^ Quarterly Technical Summary. Air Traffic Control 15 August 1971 ESD ESD RECORD C^PY^" RETURN TO. of.cys.

Mode 4A Unsafe terrain clearance with landing gear not down and flaps not in landing position

Keysight Technologies VOR and ILS Radio Navigation Receiver Test Using Option 302 for Keysight Signal Sources. Application Note

Two efficient localization algorithms for multilateration

P/N 135A FAA Approved: 7/26/2005 Section 9 Initial Release Page 1 of 10

Use of Satellite-based Technologies to Enhance safety and efficiency in ATC and Airport Operation

Current stage of bird radar systems Felix Liechti, Swiss Ornithological Institute Hans van Gasteren, Royal Airforce of The Netherlands

GPS-Squitter Channel Access Analysis

The ADS-B Receiver Pack from Flightradar24.com

IMPULSE ADVANCED ALGOTRITHMS TO ASSESS THE IMPACT OF OBSTACLES ON PULSED CNS SYSTEMS

FieldFox Handheld Education Series Part 7: Precision Validation of Radar System Performance in the Field

O T & E for ESM Systems and the use of simulation for system performance clarification

Precision Validation of Radar System Performance in the Field

MMW sensors for Industrial, safety, Traffic and security applications

Presentation to CDW Niels Jernes Vej Aalborg E - Denmark - Phone:

Improving Airport Planning & Development and Operations & Maintenance via Skyline 3D Software

Dimov Stojče Ilčev. CNS Systems

Japan-US Aviation Environmental Workshop Fukutake Hall University of Tokyo 29 November 2017

Evaluation of ADS-B at Heathrow for EUROCONTROL ADS Programme Report

Runway Incursion Prevention System ADS-B and DGPS Data Link Analysis Dallas Ft. Worth International Airport

Transcription:

Evaluation Results of Airport Surface Multilateration Hiromi Miyazaki Electronic Navigation Research Institute 1

Contents Introduction Background, Purposes Overview of Multilateration (MLAT) Advantages, How to get high performance Evaluation Tests Method, Evaluation system, Results Conclusion 2

Contents Introduction Background, Purposes Overview of Multilateration (MLAT) Advantages, How to get high performance Evaluation Tests Method, Evaluation system, Results Conclusion 3

What is the Multilateration? Multilateration is a new surveillance system which detects signals of aircraft transponders and measures the aircraft positions by TDOA technique. Receiver A Receiver C Receiver B TDOA: Time Difference of Arrival 4

Back Ground (Why do we introduce MLAT) Increasing aviation demands have brought expansions of major airports Layouts and operations in the airports have become more complex To ensure safe and smooth operation in this situation, an essential requirement is to provide accurate and highly reliable surveillance information to controllers Need to Introduce MLAT!! 5

Purposes of Evaluation (Why do we evaluate MLAT) ENRI has conducted evaluation tests of MLAT by using an evaluation system at major airports. Main purposes are; To verify performance at each airport To propose optimal receiver antenna layout based on the test results 6

In This Presentation Evaluation results at Kansai international air port (A/P) Kansai A/P has specific restrictions for antenna layout Surrounded on all four sides by sea Not install antennas on the top of the terminal building To overcome above restrictions Provide our lessons learned from evaluations 7

Contents Introduction Background, Purposes Overview of Multilateration Advantages, How to get high performance Evaluation Tests Method, Evaluation system, Results Conclusion 8

View from ATC tower 9

Conventional Surface Surveillance System (SMR: Surface Movement Radar) SMR has some problems such as; No identification information on the controller screen Performance degradation in the bad weather condition Blind area blocked by large airport buildings Blind SMR Display 10

Advantages of MLAT Call sign display on a controller screen Good Performance in all weather conditions No blind area by adapting the antenna layout No additional avionics equipment to aircraft 11

Principle of Positioning a b Hyperbolic lines: a b = Constant 12

Principle of Positioning Hyperbolic lines calculated by TDOA between Receiver A and Receiver B Receiver A Receiver B 13

Principle of Positioning Hyperbolic lines calculated by TDOA between Receiver B and Receiver C Receiver C Receiver B 14

Principle of Positioning The aircraft position is fixed as Intersection of two hyperbolic lines Receiver A Receiver C Receiver B 15

How to Get High Performance Positional relationship between aircraft and receivers Good relation bad relation Small error Large error 16

How to Get High Performance To avoid signal interference by reflection of buildings No detection Not positioning Direct signal Multipath signal Difficult to decode 17

Contents Introduction Background, Purposes Overview of Multilateration Advantages, How to get high performance Evaluation Tests Method, Evaluation system, Results Conclusion 18

Evaluation Method Evaluation items: Detection rate, Position Accuracy European standard: Performance requirement Detection Rate Position Accuracy Runway/Taxiway More than 99.9% (2s) Less than 7.5m Gate (Spot) More than 99.9% (5s) Less than 20m Evaluation by a Test vehicle equipped with a transponder To collect data efficiently to large evaluation areas Transponder Antenna 19

Evaluation System 1m 50cm Antenna Receiver unit Target processor 20

Antenna Layout (Our Concept) Our experiences from past evaluations Performance degradation: Signal interference Big problem: Huge installation cost Large number of RUs: Bring overload of the processor To avoid above problems To locate antennas as high as possible To install antennas in existing facilities as much as possible To keep the number of RUs as low as possible 21

Antenna Layout (Restricted Conditions) Surrounded on all four sides by sea Difficult to install antennas widely around the airport Antenna height is restricted by transition surface Strong restriction for MLAT to get high performance at runway/taxiway area 22

Antenna Layout (Restricted Conditions) Sophisticated terminal building in Kansa A/P To install antennas on the top of the terminal building is restricted due to a standpoint of the design Strong restriction for MLAT to get high performance at apron area 23

Layout of RU antennas ATC tower A/G tower ILS ILS Middle Glide Roof Slope Marker of cargo building 24

Layout of RU antennas 2 RUs were installed on top of ATC tower ATC tower Installation cost is cheaper than Haneda, Narita Number of RUs: 18 units is smaller than Haneda, Narita 25

Test Results (Runway/Taxiway Area) B runway area Accuracy:6.5m Detectin:100% J3 taxiway area Accuracy:6.8m Detectin:100% Accuracy:6.3m Detectin:100% A runway area Requirements Detection: 99.9% Accuracy: 7.5m 26

Accuracy: 11m Detection: 100% Test Results (Apron Area) Accuracy: 57m Detection: 41% Accuracy: 15m Detection: 100% Accuracy: 13m Detection: 100% Accuracy: 17m Detection: 100% Accuracy: 9.6m Detection: 100% Requirements Detection: 99.9% Accuracy: 20m 27

Accuracy: 11m Detection: 100% Test Results (Apron Area) Accuracy: 57m 57m Detection: 41% Accuracy: 15m Detection: 100% Surrounded all four side by building Accuracy: 13m Detection: 100% Most difficult area Accuracy: 17m Detection: 100% Accuracy: 9.6m Detection: 100% Requirements Detection: 99.9% Accuracy: 20m 28

Most Difficult Area 29

Lessons learned from the Evaluation An apron area where is surrounded on all four sides by building is most difficult area to get good performance To improve performance in such area, it is considered that some advanced techniques are required for signal detection and processing 30

Conclusion MLAT is a new surface surveillance system to be able to improve functions and performance Performance values satisfied requirements to almost area Restrictions to install antennas exist in airports Our lessons learned from the evaluation are effective The operation at Kansai A/P will start next year 31

Thank you for your attention!! Any questions? 32