COVER PAGE. Home address 5875 Brasstown Creek Road, Young Harris GA 30582

Similar documents
2006 OKLAHOMA BLUEBIRD NEST BOX RESULTS

2005 OKLAHOMA BLUEBIRD NEST BOX RESULTS

. Summary of nest box monitoring at Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve

NEST BOX TRAIL HISTORY

2016 AND 2017 BLUEBIRD NESTBOX SURVEY RESULTS

BRAS Bluebird Newsletter July 2017

NATIONAL PHENOLOGY NETWORK DATA INSTRUCTIONS

GENERAL PROTOCOL CONTENTS

Birdify Your Yard: Habitat Landscaping for Birds. Melissa Pitkin Klamath Bird Observatory

2003 OKLAHOMA BLUEBIRD NEST BOX RESULTS

NEST BOX USE BY AMERICAN KESTRELS IN THE WESTERN PIEDMONT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Barn Owl and Screech Owl Research and Management

Effectiveness of Predator Guards on Nest Boxes for House Wrens (Troglodytes aedon) A Senior Thesis

The effects of nest box location on Tree Swallow ( Tachycineta bicolor ) productivity and nest. success at Beaverhill Bird Observatory, Alberta

Building A Wood Duck Nest Box

OKLAHOMA NESTBOX PROJECT

Narrative for NABS Bluebird PowerPoint Presentation

Kittitas County Bluebird Trails Jan Demorest & Steve Moore

Birding at a Slower Pace - An Holistic Approach to Observing Birds: Why atlasing will improve your field skills AND your birding experience

OKLAHOMA NESTBOX PROJECT

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior. Haleakala National Park Makawao, Maui, Hawai'i

USE OF BLUEBIRD NEST BOXES IN COASTAL SOUTH CAROLINA

Project Barn Owl. Title Project Barn Owl

Florida Field Naturalist

Earth Sanctuary. Breeding Bird Survey May 5-July 19, Compiled by Yvonne Palka and Frances Wood

Integrating a Kestrel Nest Box Program in Undergraduate Biology Courses Joseph Gubanyi, PhD Concordia University, Seward, Nebraska

PLAN B Natural Heritage

The Florida Bluebird. Louis Nipper A Passion For Giving Bluebirds Nest Boxes to Call Home

BRAS Bluebird Newsletter May 2017

Response of Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis) to Artificial Nesting Boxes in Montgomery Bell State Park, Tennessee

SIERRA NEVADA ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN

J A N U A R Y. Bird Calendar

Volume Nine September Publication

Nest site selection criteria of House Wrens (Troglodytes aedon) at the Beaverhill Bird. Observatory. Cala Jorgensen & Danielle Simard.

Bolinas Lagoon Heron and Egret Nesting Summary 2014

Project Title: Barn owl nesting structures at Chichaqua Bottoms Greenbelt

PART FIVE: Grassland and Field Habitat Management

NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY REPORT ON PEAK DISTRICT BIRD OF PREY INITIATIVE

A survey of Birds of Forest Park in Everett, Washington

A Pilot Study Examining the Avian Diversity on a Managed Prairie Fragment By Colleen M. Crank and Lyndell M. Bade

Bolinas Lagoon Heron and Egret Nesting Summary 2015

Abstract The American Redstart is a wood warbler that is in population decline in northern Michigan.

A Proposed Integrated Wildlife Research and Conservation Strategy at the Jackson Fork Ranch, Wyoming: Workplan for Sagebrush Songbirds and Wyoming

Wood Stork Aerial Survey Trip Report. Lake Murray and Saluda River August 27, Aircraft: Fixed-Wing Cessna 210 Survey Duration: hrs

Long-term nest-box study of breeding Tree Swallows

Bald Eagle Annual Report February 1, 2016

Guidelines for Placement and Management of Wood Duck Nest Boxes in Wetland Habitats

Estimating Seasonal Avian Diversity in an Urban Wetland in Columbus, Ohio. Kaitlin Carr 20 April 2018

COMPARISON OF WOOD DUCK NEST BOX SUCCESS

Black River Audubon Society Bluebird Newsletter March 2018

PROJECT WILDBIRD Food and Feeder Preferences of Wild Birds in the United States and Canada

American Kestrel. Appendix A: Birds. Falco sparverius. New Hampshire Wildlife Action Plan Appendix A Birds-183

Prothonotary Warbler Minnesota Conservation Summary

A Practical Challenge for Atlasers: Identifying Juvenile Birds

Ulster Wildlife Barn Owl Survey Report 2014

Coquet Island Sponsor a Rosy box Update 3. The 2018 Season

Nest Box Cleaning Report September 2017 Friends of City Gardens

CORE *REQUIRED OF ALL COMMUNITIES* CIIY TOWN COUNIY YES YES YES YES YES

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Waterbird Migration, Breeding, and Habitat Use Study Plan Section 10.15

Conserving Purple Martins on McDonald-Dunn Forest, Benton County, Oregon

Volunteer Training Breeding Surveys

Massachusetts Grassland Bird Conservation. Intro to the problem What s known Your ideas

Purple Martin Project launched in Essex

Ferruginous Hawk Buteo regalis

Bolinas Lagoon Heron and Egret Nesting Summary 2017

ROSEATE SPOONBILL NESTING IN FLORIDA BAY ANNUAL REPORT

Sea Duck Joint Venture Annual Project Summary for Endorsed Projects FY08 (October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2008)

WILDLIFE MONITORING FOR THE COLLABORATIVE FOREST RESTORATION PROGRAM Protocols for Monitoring Birds, Turkey, Deer and Elk

Bolinas Lagoon Heron and Egret Nesting Summary 2016

The Prothonotary Warbler Recovery Team s Nest Box Program in Canada

Bird Watching and Identification Grades: 1-4.

A Study to Determine the Preference of Nesting Box Entrance Hole Size of Sialia sialis (Eastern Bluebird)

HERON AND EGRET MONITORING RESULTS AT WEST MARIN ISLAND: 2003 NESTING SEASON

Mitigating potential impacts to Brolga at proposed Victorian Wind Energy Facilities. Mark Venosta, Biosis NZWEA 2014

Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Project, FERC Project No. 619 Revised Study Plan

David Allen Manuwal papers, circa

Come one! Come All! Join the Fun! It is the season for The National Audubon Society 116th Annual Christmas Count.

STATUS OF SEABIRDS ON SOUTHEAST FARALLON ISLAND DURING THE 2010 BREEDING SEASON

Rocky Reach Wildlife Forum 2017 Wildlife Monitoring Proposal FINAL

British Birds. Laying dates of four species of tits in Wytham Wood, Oxfordshire E. K. Dunn

Greg Johnson and Chad LeBeau, WEST, Inc., Matt Holloran, Wyoming Wildlife Consultants

Edgar Pérez LUREC Data Final Report Summer 2013

LCCC ecology students work to improve bluebird conservation efforts

The status of the European Roller in Lithuania

REPORT Conservation biology of the endangered Madagascar plover Charadrius thoracicus,

PHENOLOGY LESSON TEACHER GUIDE

Bye Bye Birdie? Part II Featured scientist: Richard Holmes from the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest

Effect of laying date on chick production in Oyster catcher s and Herring Gulls

Mt. Mansfield Amphibian Monitoring. Update. For the Vermont Monitoring Cooperative

Lesser Sandhill Cranes, Annual Summary Homer, Alaska, Summer By Kachemak Crane Watch

Kestrels in Gloucestershire a factsheet (to be periodically updated as more records are received)

Recreational Trails and Bird Communities

Tree Swallow (Tachycineta bicolour)

Downy Woodpeckers Downies drill into soft, dead wood in a tree making a circular hole and egg chamber. The male does much of the excavation.

STATUS OF SEABIRDS ON SOUTHEAST FARALLON ISLAND DURING THE 2009 BREEDING SEASON

THE STATUS OF THE HAWAIIAN DARK-RUMPED PETREL AT HALEAKALA. John I. Kjargaard Haleakala National Park Maui, Hawaii 96768

Life cycle of the Eastern Bluebird (Sialia sialis) by Patrick Ready.

Subject: Pre-clearing Nest Survey Report for German Auto Import Network Track Near Duncan, B.C.

INSTRUCTION MANUAL Sparrow-Free Magic Halo. Keep sparrows away from your birdfeeder

1. Report No. FHWA/TX-12/ Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No.

Transcription:

COVER PAGE Name Dr. Olga Milenkaya (Olya) Title Assistant Professor of Biology Institution Young Harris College Division Math & Sciences Work address 1 College Street, Young Harris GA 30582 Home address 5875 Brasstown Creek Road, Young Harris GA 30582 Email olmilenkaya@yhc.edu, olm@vt.edu Cell (956) 606-7434 Office (706) 379-5153 Page 1 of 8

SUMMARY OF PILOT FIELD SEASON (WINTER 2015 SUMMER 2016) Based on my Research Proposal submitted in 2015 to HPAS, I had the following objectives for the 2015 2016 field season: Objective # Timeframe Objective 1 Winter 2015 2016 Begin mist-netting and banding birds. 2 Winter 2015 2016 Purchase Carolina chickadee boxes. 3 Winter 2015 2016 Build Carolina wren boxes. 4 Winter 2015 2016 Install both types of boxes. 5 March 2016 Begin nests for correlational study. 6 Spring 2016 Monitor nest boxes for occupancy and clutch and brood size for correlational study. Objective # 1 was attempted but quickly abandoned as I realized that I did not have the time to succeed with this objective. This means that I need to redesign my research program to exclude the need to individually identifying adult birds. Objective # 2 6 were successfully accomplished. Box set-up Lindley McKay, the facilities crew at Young Harris College and I set up 99 new bird boxes of three different styles: A small entry hole, B larger entry hole, and W Carolina wren style box. Of these 99 boxes, 75 boxes were set up as 25 triads where each triad included one of each style box. An additional 24 W boxes were set up as singles (not part of a triad). Boxes were set up in Young Harris, Georgia at Young Harris College, Brasstown Valley Resort, and nearby private, residential properties. Box monitoring Lindley McKay and I monitored the above mentioned 99 boxes, as well as 7 additional boxes that had been set-up by others in previous years but were no longer being monitored. These boxes are of various designs, but area all Eastern Bluebird style boxes and although I did not measure the size of their entrance hole, is probably a B-sized hole. Therefore, a total of 106 boxes were monitored in this year s pilot study. Monitoring began in mid-march and was suspended in late June due to time constraints (Lindley and I had a wedding!). At that time, only house wrens and a couple of Eastern bluebirds were still nesting and therefore their occupancy and nesting statistics are likely to be underestimated in this report. However, Carolina chickadees had completed their nesting season and their corresponding statistics should therefore be accurate. Overall conclusions Nest boxes had high occupancy rates and therefore serve as a great resource for research on Carolina chickadees and/or Eastern bluebirds. I will continue to utilize these boxes in my research but will have to change the research objectives because individual monitoring of adult birds is no longer realistic given the challenges of banding adults. Page 2 of 8

Boxes by the numbers 3 Styles of boxes 25 Boxes of size A 25 Boxes of size B 49 Boxes of style W 7 Old boxes that were monitored 106 Total boxes monitored Timing January 11-March 16-March 28-March 29-March 3-April 16-April 25-April 11-June 24-June Triads of boxes were set-up at Young Harris College and other private properties Single W boxes were set up at Brasstown Valley Resort Box monitoring began First nests found: Carolina wren, Carolina chickadee, brown-headed nuthatch First eggs were laid (by Carolina wren) First Carolina chickadee eggs were laid First Eastern bluebird eggs were laid First house wren nest found First house wren eggs were laid Last Carolina chickadee young fledged End of nest monitoring Carolina chickadees, Carolina wrens, and brown-headed nuthatches are the earliest to nest, followed shortly by Eastern bluebirds. House wrens begin to build nests about one week before the earliest Carolina chickadee young fledge. Carolina chickadees appear to be single-brooded, ending their breeding season by early June. In future field seasons, nest monitoring of Carolina chickadees should begin in early March to be conservative. Among other possible reasons, Carolina chickadees may breed early in the spring in order to avoid nest-site competition with house wrens. This interspecific interaction may be particularly fruitful for future research. Among other reasons, W-style boxes may have been poorly used because many were not set-up until March. Page 3 of 8

Occupancy by the numbers 64 Boxes were occupied Out of 106 total boxes = 60% occupancy rate 18 A boxes were occupied Out of 25 A boxes = 72% occupancy rate 26 B boxes were occupied Out of (25 B boxes + 7 Old boxes) = 81% occupancy rate 20 W boxes were occupied Out of 49 W boxes = 41% occupancy rate Although all styles of boxes were used by breeding birds, the A and B boxes were much more used than the W-style boxes. Although I originally proposed to pursue a research program with Carolina Wrens by using the W-style boxes, the low occupancy rate of these boxes suggests that I should reconsider. Nests by the numbers Note that here, I consider a nest to be any nesting attempt which includes any nesting material that was placed into a box, regardless of whether or not any eggs were laid. 84 Nests found Out of 64 occupied boxes Out of 106 available boxes 24 Nests in A boxes Out of 18 occupied A boxes Out of 25 available A boxes 37 Nests in B or Old boxes Out of 26 occupied B+Old boxes Out of 32 available B+Old boxes 23 Nests in W boxes Out of 20 occupied A boxes Out of 49 available A boxes = 1.3 nests per occupied box = 0.8 nests per available box = 1.3 nests per occupied A box = 0.96 nests per available A box = 1.4 nests per occupied B+Old boxes = 1.2 nests per available B+Old boxes = 1.2 nests per occupied W box = 0.47 nests per available W box & As above Page 4 of 8

Species by the numbers 32 Nests of Carolina chickadee 16 nests in A boxes 10 nests in B boxes 6 nests in W boxes 21 Nests of Eastern bluebird 16 nests in B+Old boxes 5 nests in W boxes 16 Nests of house wren 7 nests in A boxes 7 nests in B boxes 2 nests in W boxes 8 Nests of Carolina wren All in W boxes 3 Nests of tree swallow All in Old boxes 2 Nests of unknown species 1 Nest of tufted titmouse In B box 1 Nest of brown-headed nuthatch In A box Eastern bluebirds do not nest in A boxes, Carolina wrens do not nest in cavity boxes, Carolina chickadees and House wrens nest in any style of box. Most parsimonious explanation for Eastern bluebird nests being in B and W boxes is that they simply do not fit into A boxes. W boxes were never preferentially chosen by Eastern bluebirds, but were instead used after a failure in the nearby B box. Carolina wrens only chose W boxes as they are known to not be cavity nesters. Carolina chickadees nested in W boxes only in areas that did not have either A or B boxes. House wrens are able to fit into A boxes, and therefore utilized all styles of boxes. Tree swallows used only Old boxes, presumably because these happened to all be located in suitable habitat (open fields near standing water). Page 5 of 8

Carolina chickadee preferences To assess preference for box-style, I considered only nesting attempts of Carolina chickadees that were either the first or only nesting attempt in their triad of boxes. In this way, we are considering only those nesting attempts for which the chickadees had the full spectrum of options between A, B and W-style boxes. 17 Carolina chickadee nesting attempts fit this criteria for a comparison between A and B style boxes. Of these 17 nesting attempts, 13 were placed in A-style boxes compared to 4 in B-style boxes. 16 Carolina chickadee nesting attempts fit this criteria for a comparison between all three styles of boxes. Of these 16 nesting attempts, 13 were placed in A-style boxes compared to 3 in B- style boxes and 0 in W-style boxes. When given the option of A, B and W-style boxes, Carolina chickadees overwhelmingly chose A-style boxes for their nesting attempts. Carolina chickadees prefer A-style boxes over B and W-style boxes. That they did not nest in W-style boxes is unsurprising since they are known cavity-nesters. That they prefer A over B-style boxes contradicts Dr. Ballentine s suggestion that they may prefer B over A-style boxes. An analysis of the Highlands and Franklin data would be informative here as to whether there are site differences in chickadee preference. It is important to highlight here that these results are for nesting attempts and therefore include all cases of nesting material being placed into a box, regardless of whether or not that nest was subsequently used for egg-laying. Page 6 of 8

Nest outcomes by the numbers 33% of all nests found were abandoned (mostly during nest building stage). 27% of all nests found were successfully in fledging at least one young (based on feeding observation within 2 days of expected fledging and/or fledgling re-sighting). 19% of all nests found were depredated (e.g., snakes, feral cats, house wrens, etc.). Some house wren nests were found within days or 1 2 weeks after predation on the previous occupant, suggesting that some predation events may have been predation/usurpation by house wrens. The extent of this is unclear. 17% of all nests found had an unknown outcome (primarily because our monitoring of house wren nests was lacking, and because we suspended nest monitoring while some birds were still nesting in late June). 3.6% of all nests found failed due to brown-headed cowbird brood parasitism. Two of these nests were of Carolina chickadees and one of Carolina wren, and all were in W-style boxes which have openings large enough for cowbirds to access. Approximately 1/3 of all nesting attempts are abandoned (mostly during building), 1/3 are successful, and 1/3 fail for other reasons, including brood parasitism, predation and possibly house wren activity. The relatively high failure rate may be caused by edge-effects because all boxes were placed near edge habitat to facilitate accessibility for researchers. I should consider predator guards for nest year (however, these are unlikely to be approved at Young Harris College for aesthetic reasons). The house wren observations warrant further research on interspecific interactions. That 1/3 of nests were abandoned is consistent with my previous experience with other passerine species, but I do not know if this is normal for these species, or in this area. Although anecdotal, I noticed many nesting attempts being abandoned after finding wasp nests in the bird boxes. Next year, I will apply soap to the inside of the boxes to discourage wasps from using/usurping the boxes. Page 7 of 8

Banding by the numbers 44 Eastern bluebird nestlings banded. Of these, 11 individuals were later re-sighted as fledglings and sub-adults on 15 separate, opportunistic occasions. 44 Carolina chickadee nestlings banded. Of these, 1 individual was re-sighted (opportunistically, ~ 1 mile away). 4 Brown-headed nuthatch nestlings banded. None were re-sighted. 4 Carolina wren nestlings banded. All four were re-sighted shortly after fledging in the vicinity around the nest. This re-sighting effort was strategic, not opportunistic. 4 Tufted titmouse adults were banded during mist-netting. None were re-sighted. 100 Total passerine individuals that were banded during winter 2015 summer 2016 field season. More Eastern bluebirds were re-sighed than any other species, including Carolina chickadees despite the same number of individual nestlings being banded. Eastern bluebirds were easy to opportunistically re-sight, presumably because the fledglings stay near their nest boxes for at least several weeks. They also occupy open habitats that makes them more conspicuous and easier to see. By contrast, Carolina chickadee fledglings seem to leave their area shortly after fledging and presumably occupy denser forest and are higher in the canopy, making re-sighting very challenging. Mist-netting and banding of adult birds was a failure that required a lot of time, and yielded too few captures of target species. In the future, adult banding is ill-advised given my time constraints and low success rate, and nestling banding is only meaningful among Eastern bluebirds. If my future research is with Carolina chickadees, I will likely abandon all banding. Page 8 of 8