EMMA Project Update + Operational Concept for a complete A-SMGCS

Similar documents
EMMA2 Operational Concept

Operational Concept for a complete A-SMGCS

ICAO AFI/MID ASBU IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP. Cairo, November 2015

ATM-ASDE System Cassiopeia-5

Intelligent Surveillance and Management Functions for Airfield Applications Based on Low Cost Magnetic Field Detectors. Publishable Executive Summary

SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS. Operational Improvement and Cost Savings, from Airport Surface to Airspace

Test Results PRAGUE. J. Jakobi, F. Morlang, A. Gilbert DLR, PAS. Document No: D6.3.1 Version No. 1.0 Classification: Public Number of pages: 120

BEYOND RADAR ERA ATM SOLUTIONS

Final Report for Publication (Deliverable D5.5)

SIMULATION AND FLIGHT TEST PLAN D32

Air Traffic Soft. Management. Ultimate System. Call Identifier : FP TREN-3 Thematic Priority 1.4 Aeronautics and Space

Surveillance Strategy

ICAO SARPS AND GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS ON SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS

Rockwell Collins ADS-B Perspective Bangkok March 2005

SURVEILLANCE & ATM SYSTEMS :

ANASTASIA. Presentation at Aeronautics Days 2006, Vienna June

Integration of surveillance in the ACC automation system

Informal paper. An Overview of ADS. - Principles, Drivers, Activities, Technology and Standards - 1 June 1999, v1.0 EUROCONTROL

2. Radar receives and processes this request, and forwards it to Ground Datalink Processor (in our case named GRATIS)

USE OF DISTRIBUTED REAL-TIME SIMULATIONS IN ATM VALIDATION: EXAMPLES BASED ON THE ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLER PILOT INTERACTION

ATC-Wake: Integrated Air Traffic Control Wake Vortex Safety and Capacity System

Ron Turner Technical Lead for Surface Systems. Syracuse, NY. Sensis Air Traffic Systems - 1

Preparatory paper: food for thought

COMPARISON OF SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGIES ICAO

Automatic Dependent Surveillance -ADS-B

ACAS Xu UAS Detect and Avoid Solution

Optimized LED Architecture based on a Parallel Circuit

Evaluation Results of Multilateration at Narita International Airport

ASSEMBLY 39TH SESSION

Performance Based Surveillance & New Sensors technology

ASSEMBLY 39TH SESSION

Final Project Report. Abstract. Document information

Human Integration in the Life-cycle of Aviation Systems HILAS

Preliminary Safety Case for Enhanced Air Traffic Services in Non-Radar Areas using ADS-B surveillance PSC ADS-B-NRA

[EN 105] Evaluation Results of Airport Surface Multilateration

ADS-B RELATED DEVELOPMENTS BY AN Conf/11 AND APANPIRG & OBJECTIVE OF AND PROGRESS BY ADS-B TASK FORCE

SESAR EXPLORATORY RESEARCH. Dr. Stella Tkatchova 21/07/2015

Automatic Dependent Surveillance. Requirements

Final Project Report. Abstract. Document information

Introduction to PBN and RNP

Systems for Green Operations ITD

Conflict Alerts in A-SMGCS

GA and NextGen How technologies like WAAS and ADS-B will change your flying! Presented By Claire Kultgen

International Programmes & GNSS Monitoring

INTEGRITY AND CONTINUITY ANALYSIS FROM GPS JANUARY TO MARCH 2017 QUARTERLY REPORT

INTEGRITY AND CONTINUITY ANALYSIS FROM GPS JULY TO SEPTEMBER 2016 QUARTERLY REPORT

CENA PD/3 FINAL REPORT Annex E: Airborne aspects

EVOLUTION OF AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE

ELSA Study and Recommendations. November 2016

Ground Based Augmentation Systems (GBAS) Introduction

Radar/Lidar Sensors SESAR XP1 Trials at CDG airport WakeNet-USA October 2012 Boeing, Seattle, USA

Civil Radar Systems.

ADS-B Introduction / Tutorial

DLR Project ADVISE-PRO Advanced Visual System for Situation Awareness Enhancement Prototype Introduction The Project ADVISE-PRO

MIDANPIRG CNS SG/7 Meeting Cairo, Egypt, 31May - 2June 2016

ELEVENTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE. Montreal, 22 September to 3 October 2003 TOOLS AND FUNCTIONS FOR GNSS RAIM/FDE AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION

Second Iteration Baseline Report/Matrix

Final Project Report. Abstract. Document information

A EUROCONTROL View on the Research Needs & the Network of Centres of Excellence

Integrated CNS: Time for a conceptual change?

Flight Data Handling with Augmented Reality. Doctoral Symposium ICRAT 18, Castelldefels, Barcelona (Catalonia) June 25 th 29th 2018

ARTES 10 Phase 1 workplan of activities.

Organización de Aviación Civil Internacional. Международная организация гражданской авиации. Ref.: AN 7/ /78 27 November 2015

Comment Version:

Regional and Inter-Regional Seminar and Workshop on Search and Rescue

REMOTE TOWERS UK CAA PERSPECTIVE. Executive Digital Tower Symposium November 2018 Dave Drake UK CAA

Mode S Skills 101. OK, so you ve got four basic surveillance skills, you ve got the: ATCRBS Skills Mode S Skills TCAS Skills ADS-B skills

Bayesian Filter to accurately track airport moving objects

Naturalistic Flying Study as a Method of Collecting Pilot Communication Behavior Data

FOT-NET & TeleFOT. Petri Mononen VTT Large Scale Collaborative Project

Journée d Information sur les futurs appels à proposition, Lille, le 18 avril ème PCRD - Priorité Transports de Surface Durables

Newsletter No. 2 (July 2017)

PBN fleet equipage according to FPL content. Michel ROELANDT

An Introduction to Airline Communication Types

Regulations. Aeronautical Radio Service

Concertation Meeting Brussels, 24/3/2003

EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION EUROCONTROL EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE CDG REAL-TIME SIMULATION RESULTS

Partners. Mobility Schemes Ensuring ACCESSibility of Public Transport for ALL Users. all.eu

Human Factors lab. Office National d Études et de Recherches Aérospatiales

Small Airport Surveillance Sensor (SASS)

Exelis FIS-B: Status & Future Presentation for Friends & Partners in Aviation Weather 2014

Propagation of airborne spacing errors in merging traffic streams

GBAS FOR ATCO. June 2017

Airport Visual Aids. Illuminating Engineering Society Airport Lighting Committee. Trade Winds Island Grand Beach Resort St.

Investigation of Runway Incursion Prevention Systems

ESA Iris Programme Analysis & definition of the Satellite System Operations. Briefing 28 July

HAVEit Highly Automated Vehicles for Intelligent Transport

AeroMACS Verification Plan & Report - Phase 2

EC UA Aviation Conference, Windhoek, Namibia, April 2 & 3, 2009

Security Assessment for Prototype First Iteration

Operating on the Radio Frequency of 1090 Megahertz (MHz)

10 Secondary Surveillance Radar

ICAO policy on GNSS, GNSS SARPs and global GNSS developments. Jim Nagle Chief, Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Section ICAO

Generic Experimental Cockpit (GECO)

2 Flight Plans 1 Fill in the appropriate boxes 2 Find acceptable routes 3 Useful Newbie Comments

Evolution from 3D to 4D radar

An Interoperability Assessment Model for CNS/ATM Systems

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

GNSS for Landing Systems and Carrier Smoothing Techniques Christoph Günther, Patrick Henkel

New Markets Emerging from Aviation and Autonomy (M. Brancati CTO Telespazio)

Transcription:

EMMA Project Update + Operational Concept for a complete A-SMGCS Jörn Jakobi, DLR Internet: http://www.dlr.de/emma Integrated Project of the Sixth Framework Programme, Priority 1.4: Aeronautics and Space, sponsored by EC, DG TREN Contract FP6-503192

Why EMMA The European Commission funded systematically A-SMGCS implementation projects: FP4: DEFAMM (1996 1999) FP5: BETA (2000 2002) FP6: EMMA (2004 2006) which will pave the way forward to harmonise the implementation of A-SMGCS level 1&2 EMMA2 (2006 2008) will consider higher levels of A-SMGCS A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 2

Objectives Harmonisation and Consolidation of level 1&2 Concepts Implementation of a level 1&2 A-SMGCS Harmonised Implementation of A-SMGCS Innovative A-SMGCS-R&D and A-SMGCS-Spin-Offs Verification and Validation of a level 1&2 A-SMGCS A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 3

EMMA Consortium 24 Partner, 9 States 24 Months Duration Budget of 16 Mio. Total 3 Test Sites A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 4

EMMA Project Structure Contact to other Projects Exploitation Dissemination GP0 IP Management GP7 User Forum SP1 Operational Concept SP 4,5 & 6 Ground SP 4,5 & 6 Developments Ground SP3,4,5 Developments Ground Developments SP2 Airborne Developments A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 5 SP6 Validation Prague Toulouse Malpensa Airborne

Achievements so far (1) A harmonised definition of A-SMGCS levels I & II in partnership with Eurocontrol Development of algorithm and analysis tool (MOGADOR by CENA/DSNA) to assess surveillance and alerting performance Surveillance performance assessment at the biggest European Hub Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport Concept for higher-level services, equipment and procedures outlined Functional Hazard Assessment (FHA) and Preliminary System Safety Assessment (PSSA) conducted Verification and Validation Methodology harmonised with 3 test sites RWY-Incursion Scenarios tested in Real Time Simulation for Prague and Milan Malpensa and Systems tuned to operational needs A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 6

Achievements so far (2) Cockpit Real Time Simulation performed at Airbus and DLR Cockpit Simulator Three different MLAT Systems under development in Toulouse by Thales ATM and in Malpensa by SELEX (formerly Alenia Marconi Systems) In Prague by ERA under operational use ADS-B solutions using 1090ES integrated and under test Onboard Guidance planned to demonstrate in TUD Test Vehicles DLR Test Aircraft Revenue Aircraft A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 7

Dissemination of Results Consolidate with EUROCONTROL findings Consolidate with C-ATM (Co-operative Air Traffic Management) Promoted at different international events (FAA-EUROCONTROL ATM Seminar, ATM Symposium, JISSA, CAATS, A-SMGCS workshops) Feedback to ICAO to mature Manual on A-SMGCS in partnership with Eurocontrol Feed in EMMA2 (as a perfect starting point same test sites and nearly same partners) Feedback to EUROCAE to mature A-SMGCS MASPS Co-ordination with other projects (e.g. FLYSAFE, D-TAXI) A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 8

Ongoing Issues Focus in the remaining runtime of EMMA on Consolidation of concept documents (updates) Toulouse and Malpensa Installations Operational Tests at Prague and Malpensa Shadow Mode Trials at Toulouse D-MAN demonstrations at DLR simulator with Prague scenarios Analysis of Results Recommendation Report Consolidate and Disseminate actively the Findings (e.g. EMMA Demonstration Day [Prague, 21 st /22 nd March 2006], Eurocontrol A-SMGCS group) Disseminate flyers and a short video A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 9

EMMA Operational Concept for a complete A-SMGCS Internet: http://www.dlr.de/emma Integrated Project of the Sixth Framework Programme, Priority 1.4: Aeronautics and Space, sponsored by EC, DG TREN Contract FP6-503192

Background EMMA aims to prepare the concept for higher implementation levels of A-SMGCS that will be built up in EMMA2 Difficulties with existing ICAO, EUOCONTROL, and EUROCAE levels of implementation when describing new services: Currently, 4 A-SMGCS levels But with routing, guidance, and onboard services the system gets more complex (there are more than 2 evolution levels) 4 A-SMGCS functions can hardly be matched to the services received by ATCOs, Pilots, and Vehicles Drivers No care for technical enablers and procedures No evolutionary steps with ICAO requirments A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 11

Definition of Services proposed by EMMA Service Description is allocated to the user who receives it and not to a primary function 3 main users: ATCOs receive Surveillance Routing Control Guidance (ground based guidance) service Pilots receive an onboard service enabled by A-SMGCS Vehicle Drivers receive an onboard service enabled by A- SMGCS A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 12

EMMA Approach 4 Work Shops with Partners from Industry (Airbus, PAS, TATM, SELEX) R&D (DLR, NLR, EUROCONTROL) Users ANSPs Airlines Airports (ANS_CR, AENA, DSNA, ENAV, DFS) (DLH, CSA) (CSL, AENA) D131 EMMA OSED-update Document A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 13

Definition of Services proposed by EMMA When defining a service, technical functions and their technical enablers have to be regarded It is an iterative process Service technical Enablers A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 14

Definition of Steps of Implementation Different steps of implementation for each individual service that depends on following criteria: (1) Development status of the technical enabler (standardised, on the market or to be developed yet) (2) Development status of the service (already validated or only at the stage of a concept) (3) Degree of interrelations to other functions (complexity) (4) Quality of the enabling equipment (needed reliability, safety) (5) Impact on current operational procedures and size of the changes (6) Cost/benefit considerations A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 15

Definition of Functions and Technical Enablers ATCO - Surveillance Function On-board Enabler Ground Enabler Provide traffic information Provide traffic context Interface with ATCOs Mode S transponder ADS-out Cooperative sensors (SSR, Mode-S, ADS-B, GNSS) Non-cooperative sensors (SMR) Sensor data fusion Flight information Vehicle information Aeronautical info server Meteo data HMI component A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 16

EMMA Surveillance Service Step 1 Only Manoeuvring Area covered1 Transition Phase: Authorised Authorised but non-cooperative cooperative Movements (only pos) (e.g. GA) Movements (pos & id) Non-authorised Cooperative Movements (pos & id) Non-authorised non-cooperative movements (only pos) Intruders Obstacles (whether moving or stationary, having an equivalent radar cross section of 1 square meter or more) A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 17

Authorised cooperative Movements (aircarft and vehicles identified and authorised) Non-authorised Cooperative Movements (aircraft & vehicles identified but not authorised) Non-authorised non-cooperative movements (aircraft and vehicles detected but not authorised and not automatically identified) Obstacles (whether moving or stationary, having an equivalent radar cross section of 1 square meter or more) Transition Phase: Authorised but non-coperative Movements (e.g. VFR) [1] All movements on the manoeuvring have to be authorised by aerodrome controller (compare 7.5.3.2.1, doc4444). With EMMA all authoried movements shall be properly equipped to enable automatic identification. All other movements are intruders or obstacles. Intruders EMMA Surveillance Service Step 2 Manoeuvering + Apron area Authorised cooperative Aircraft (pos & id) Transition Phase: Authorised but non-cooperative Aircraft (only pos) (e.g. GA) A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 18

Authorised cooperative Movements (aircarft and vehicles identified and authorised) Non-authorised Cooperative Movements (aircraft & vehicles identified but not authorised) Non-authorised non-cooperative movements (aircraft and vehicles detected but not authorised and not automatically identified) Obstacles (whether moving or stationary, having an equivalent radar cross section of 1 square meter or more) Transition Phase: Authorised but non-coperative Movements (e.g. VFR) [1] All movements on the manoeuvring have to be authorised by aerodrome controller (compare 7.5.3.2.1, doc4444). With EMMA all authoried movements shall be properly equipped to enable automatic identification. All other movements are intruders or obstacles. Intruders EMMA Surveillance Service Step 3 (+VIS3) Manoeuvering + Apron area Authorised cooperative Aircraft (pos & id) Authorised Cooperative Vehicles 2 ((pos & id) within designated areas where vehicles can conflict with aircraft Transition Phase: Authorised but non-cooperative Aircraft (e.g. GA) [2] In low visibility conditions, when movements are not able to avoid each other, parts of the apron area (taxi lanes, active stands) are used exclusively for authorised movements. In LVO Vehicles operating in these areas must be authorised and equipped. In good visibility conditions vehicles do not have to be controlled on the Apron (compare also ICAO doc 9830 3.5.16.3). Non-authorised Vehicles 2 Intruder Obstacles (whether moving or stationary, having an equivalent radar cross section of 1 square meter or more within designated area where obstacles can conflict aircraft movements [taxi lanes, active stands]) A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 19

Definition of Services Steps ATCO - Surveillance Service Steps Step 1 Description Detection and accurate position of all aircraft, all vehicles, and obstacles Identification of all cooperative aircraft and vehicles Comments Manoeuvring area Step 2 Step1 + Detection and identification of all aircrafts Movement area Step 3 Step2 + Detection and identification of all vehicles Detection of Obstacles Movement area Vis3 - where manoeuvring a/c may come into conflict with each other or with vehicles ICAO doc 9830 3.5.16.3 A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 20

Definition of Functions and Technical Enablers ATCO - Control Function On-board Enabler Ground Enabler Conflict and Incursion Detection and Alerting Surveillance function + alerting algorithm Conflict Resolution Resolution algorithm Support to Communication Support to coordination between ATCOs Data Link (point to point) Onboard HMI component Data Link Ground HMI component Flight Data Management Electronic Flight Strips A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 21

Service Step Step 1 Definition of Service Steps ATCO - Control Description Runway Conflict/Incursion detection and alerting Comments Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Taxiway Conflict/Incursion detection and alerting Detection of plan / route deviation Support to Communication (CPDLC) ATCO coordination (EFS) Conflict/Incursion detection and alerting of apron / stand / gate conflicts Implementation of conflict resolution advisory may be initiated at any step A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 22

Definition of Functions and Technical Enablers ATCO - Routing Function Manual Routing Semi-automatic Routing Automatic Routing None None None On-board Enabler Ground Enabler Input Devices + simple routing algorithm Routing algorithm + Interfaces to external data Routing algorithm + Interfaces to external data Planning algorithm (SUtime, DMAN) A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 23

Definition of Service Steps ATCO - Routing Service Steps Description Comments Step 1 Manual Routing Manual input of a route supported by the shortest taxi route w.r.t. to local standard routes Step 2 Semi-automatic Routing Routing service proposes a most suitable route, taking into account control and flight plan information. Step 3 Automatic Routing Routing service provides route (track) and time information by aid of a planning function. Step 4 A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 24

Definition of Service Steps ATCO Routing Efficient taxi route + Start-up time Source: BETA A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 25

Definition of Service Steps ATCO - Routing Service Steps Description Comments Step 1 Manual Routing Manual input of a route supported by the shortest taxi route w.r.t. to local standard routes Step 2 Semi-automatic Routing Routing service proposes a most suitable route, taking into account control and flight plan information. Step 3 Automatic Routing Routing service provides route (track) and time information by aid of a planning function. Step 4 Automatic Routing + ROP (DMAN) [1] Planning support is further increased by a departure manager providing optimal runway occupancy times. A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 26

Definition of Functions and Technical Enablers ATCO Ground Guidance Function On-board Enabler Ground Enabler Manual Operation None Controller HMI (Switchboard or Lighting Display), Airfield Lighting Control System, Selectively switchable Centre Line Lights and Stop Bars Automatic Operation None Same as above + Interfaces to Control and Surveillance Function Automatic Airfield Lighting Control System A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 27

Definition of Services Steps ATCO Ground Guidance Service Steps Step 1 Step 2 Description Manual Operation of Ground based Guidance Means Automatic Operation of Ground based Guidance Means Comments Equipment available on the market. Automatic generation of guidance information, based on the cleared route and the actual position of the aircraft. A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 28

Definition of Functions and Technical Enablers Pilot (Flight Crew) Function 1/2 On-board Enabler Ground Enabler Airport Moving Map Surface Movement Alerting Ground Traffic Display Traffic Conflict Detection Ground / Air Database Upload Own-ship position and state vector Aeronautical database (airport layout) AMM Conflict and Alerting algorithm ADS-B-in AMM Conflict and Alerting algorithm Aeronautical database TIS-B (to see non ADS-B aircraft, vehicles) TIS-B Airport Mapping Database server X-NOTAM D-ATIS A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 29

Function 2/2 On-board Enabler Ground Enabler CPDLC Ground Clearances and Taxi Route Uplink Braking and Steering Cues HUD Surface Guidance Automated Steering Definition of Functions and Technical Enablers Pilot (Flight Crew) CPDLC (DCL, D-Taxi) Airport Moving Map Taxi-Route (uplinked or not) Aeronautical database (airport layout) B&S algorithm Taxi Route (uplinked or not) Own-ship position and state vector Aeronautical database Taxi Route (uplinked or not) Own-ship position and state vector Auto-Pilot for taxiing CPDLC Routing service A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 30

Definition of Service Steps Pilot (Flight Crew) Service Steps Step 1 Step 2 Description Airport Moving Map Surface Movement Alerting Braking and Steering Cue (for landing roll) Ground-Air Database Upload Ground Traffic Display Traffic Conflict Detection CPDLC Ground Clearance and Taxi Route Uplink Braking and Steering Cue (landing roll and taxi) Comments Equipment already available Ground TIS-B + DL needed Step 3 HUD Surface Guidance HUD is already available for approach Step 4 Automated Steering Major changes in equipments and procedures A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 31

Definition of Functions and Technical Enablers Vehicle Drivers Function On-board Enabler Ground Enabler Airport Moving Map Surface Movement Alerting Ground Traffic Display Traffic Conflict Detection Support to Vehicles Operations via data link Own-ship position and state vector Aeronautical database (airport layout) AMM Conflict and Alerting algorithm ADS-B-in AMM Conflict and Alerting algorithm Ground/vehicle datalink TIS-B TIS-B Ground/vehicle datalink A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 32

Definition of Services Steps Vehicle Drivers Service Steps Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Description Airport Moving Map inlc. alerts Ground-Air Database Upload Ground Traffic Display incl. alerts Dispatch and Guidance via data link Comments No ground equipment Equipment already available Ground TIS-B + DL needed A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 33

Definition of Procedures Workshop with Users to discuss by which potential procedures the services should be applied Procedures defined for higher services but still very prematured But we need initial procedures to test them in validation activities (EMMA2) Procedures are the core to enable a service to bring benefit Initial procedures used to cluster service steps to A-SMGCS implementation packages EMMA doc D135 - Op. Requirements Doc A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 34

Logical Interdependencies between EMMA Service Steps automation - complexity new procedures Ground System Surveillance Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Control Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Routing Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Guidance Step 1 Step 2 Aircraft Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 enables A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 35

Logical Interdependencies between EMMA Service Steps Surveillance Control Guidance Routing Aircraft Vehicles S1 id/pos everything manoeuvering C1 Conflict Rwy Expected Steps to each Service S2 Step 1 + id/pos a/c in the movement area C2 Conflict Twy C3 Plan / Route Deviation G1 Manual switched ground guidance (e.g. Heathrow) R1 Manual V1 AMM A1 AMM R2 Semi-auto V2 Ground Traffic R3 Auto (planning) A2 Ground traffic + CPDLC S3 S2 + id/pos vehicles movement area C4 Conflict Apron G2 Auto switch A3 HUD R4 ROP V3 Data link A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 36 A4 Auto steerin g

ICAO A-SMGCS Categorisation 1. Visibility Conditions Vis 1 no impact Vis 2 ATCO cannot see Vis 3 Pilots cannot see and avoid (400m < Vis 3 < 75m) Vis 4 Pilots cannot taxi (< 75m) 2. Traffic Density Light (L): 0 < movements < 20 Medium (M): 20 < movements < 35 Heavy (H): 35 < movements 3. Aerodrome Layout Basic (B): = 1 RWY = 1 TWY = 1 Apron Simple (S): = 1 RWY > 1 TWY > 1 Apron Complex (C): > 1 RWY > 1 TWY > 1 Apron A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 37

ICAO implementation levels A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 38

ICAO A-SMGCS Categorisation T1 T36 Level I Level II Level III Level IV Level V A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 39

ICAO A-SMGCS Categorisation T1 T36 + EMMA View Level I Level II Level III Level IV Level V A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 40

EMMA Matrix for Implementation Packages L A Y O U T TRAFFIC DENSITY VISIBILITY Vis 1 Vis 2 Vis 3 Vis 4 C O M P L E X Medium Implementati on Package (IP) 1 IP2 IP3 IP4 Heavy IP5 IP6 IP7 IP8 A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 41

ICAO A-SMGCS Definition A system providing routing, guidance and surveillance for the control of aircraft and vehicles in order to maintain the declared surface movement rate under all weather conditions within the aerodrome visibility operational level (AVOL) while maintaining the required level of safety. SAFETY THROUGHPUT A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 42

EMMA Matrix for Implementation Packages Traffic Density Vis 1 Vis 2 Vis 3 Vis 4 Medium optional Heavy Optional A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 43

Logical Interdependencies between EMMA Service Steps Surveillance Control Guidance Routing Airborne Vehicles S1 id/pos everything manoeuvering C1 Conflict Rwy Expected Steps to each Service S2 Step 1 + id/pos a/c in the movement area C2 Conflict Twy C3 Plan / Route Deviation G1 Manual switched ground guidance (e.g. Heathrow) R1 Manual V1 AMM A1 AMM R2 Semi-auto V2 Ground Traffic R3 Auto (planning) A2 Ground traffic + CPDLC S3 S2 + id/pos vehicles movement area C4 Conflict Apron G2 Auto switch A3 HUD R4 ROP V3 Data link A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 44 A4 Auto steerin g

Proposed Initial Implementation Packages Traffic Density Vis 1 Vis 2 Vis 3 Vis 4 Medium S1 + C1 optional Heavy Optional A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 45

Proposed Initial Implementation Packages Traffic Density Vis 1 Vis 2 Vis 3 Vis 4 Medium S1 + C1 S2 + C1 optional Heavy Optional A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 46

Proposed Initial Implementation Packages Traffic Density Vis 1 Vis 2 Vis 3 Vis 4 Medium S1 + C1 S2 + C1 S2 + C1 + A2 + V2 optional Heavy Optional A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 47

A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 48

Proposed Initial Implementation Packages Traffic Density Vis 1 Vis 2 Vis 3 Vis 4 S2 + C1 + A2 + V2 Medium S1 + C1 S2 + C1 S3 + C4 + R3 optional Heavy Optional A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 49

Seperation in Vis 3 Today DLH 1354 31 B737 BWA 1245 31 A340 A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 50

Seperation in Vis 3 Today with A-SMGCS 257 72 DLH 1354 31 B737 BWA 1245 31 A340 A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 51

Seperation in Vis 3 - Ground STCA or - Aircraft approaching stationary traffic (ICAO doc 9830, 3.4.5.7 b) 2)) 257 72 DLH 1354 31 B737 BWA 1245 31 A340 A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 52

Seperation in Vis 3 CSA 257 31 AT72 DLH 1354 31 B737 BWA 1245 31 A340 A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 53

Seperation in Vis 3 CSA 257 31 AT72 DLH 1354 31 B737 BWA 1245 31 A340 A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 54

Seperation in Vis 3 CSA 257 31 AT72 DLH 1354 31 B737 BWA 1245 31 A340 A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 55

Proposed Initial Implementation Packages Traffic Density Vis 1 Vis 2 Vis 3 Vis 4 S2 + C1 + A2 + V2 Medium S1 + C1 S2 + C1 S3 + C4 + R3 optional Heavy Optional A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 56

Proposed Initial Implementation Packages Traffic Density Vis 1 Vis 2 Vis 3 Vis 4 S2 + C1 + A2 + V2 Medium S1 + C1 S2 + C1 S3 + C4 + R3 S2 + C4+ V2+ R3 optional Heavy Optional A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 57

Proposed Initial Implementation Packages Traffic Density Vis 1 Vis 2 Vis 3 Vis 4 Medium S1 + C1 S2 + C1 S2 + C4+ V2+ R3 S2 + C2 + A3 + V2 optional Heavy Optional A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 58

Proposed Initial Implementation Packages Traffic Density Vis 1 Vis 2 Vis 3 Vis 4 Medium S1 + C1 S2 + C1 S2 + C4+ V2+ R3 S2 + C2 + A3 + V2 optional A1 + V1 R3/R4 +A2 +V1 A2 + V2 C2+R3/R4+A2+V1 R4 + A2 C4 + A4 + R3/R4 Heavy Optional A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 59

Proposed Initial Implementation Packages Traffic Density Vis 1 Vis 2 Vis 3 Vis 4 Medium S1 + C1 S2 + C1 S2 + C4+ V2+ R3 S2 + C2 + A3 + V2 optional A1 + V1 R3/R4 +A2 +V1 A2 + V2 C2+R3/R4+A2+V1 R4 + A2 C4 + A4 + R3/R4 Heavy S2 + C3 + R4 S2 + C3 + R4 S2 + C4 + V2 + R4 S2 + C3 + A3 + V2 + R4 Optional A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 60

Proposed Initial Implementation Packages Traffic Density Vis 1 Vis 2 Vis 3 Vis 4 Medium S1 + C1 S2 + C1 S2 + C4+ V2+ R3 S2 + C2 + A3 + V2 optional A1 + V1 R3/R4 +A2 +V1 A2 + V2 C2+R3/R4+A2+V1 R4 + A2 C4 + A4 + R3/R4 Heavy S2 + C3 + R4 S2 + C3 + R4 S2 + C4 + V2 + R4 S2 + C3 + A3 + V2 + R4 Optional A2 + V2 A2 + V2 A2 + V3 A4 + V3 A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 61

Proposed Initial Implementation Packages Traffic Density Vis 1 Vis 2 Vis 3 Vis 4 Medium S1 + C1 S2 + C1 S2 + C4+ V2+ R3 S2 + C2 + A3 + V2 Eurocontrol EMMA optional A1 + V1 R3/R4 +A2 +V1 A2 + V2 C2+R3/R4+A2+V1 R4 + A2 C4 + A4 + R3/R4 Heavy S2 + C3 + R4 S2 + C3 + R4 S2 + C4 + V2 + R4 S2 + C3 + A3 + V2 + R4 Optional A2 + V2 A2 + V2 A2 + V3 A4 + V3 A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 62

What did he say? www.dlr.de/emma joern.jakobi@dlr.de Questions? A-SMGCS Work Shop, Luxembourg, 2005 63